Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hossein Rahnama, Ryerson University Dr.Alireza Sadeghian, Ryerson University Dr.William Melek, University of Waterloo
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
Difficulty of the General practitioners to remain up to date
Introduction
Difficulty of the General practitioners to remain up to date
Introduction
Difficulty of the General practitioners to remain up to date
Intolerant patients
Introduction
Difficulty of the General practitioners to remain up to date
Intolerant patients
Introduction
Difficulty of the General practitioners to remain up to date
Intolerant patients
Misdiagnosis
Previous work
Previous work
Non-Generic/Specific expert systems
Previous work
Non-Generic/Specific expert systems
Previous work
Non-Generic/Specific expert systems
Objective
Develop a framework that mimics the reasoning methods of a physician.
Diagnosis Treatment
Target Users:
Physicians and General Practitioner
Rudiments
Understanding the diagnosis Researching the patient encounter Creating a logic from the patients encounter
Patient Encounter:
Patients Demography
Patient
History
Symptoms
Subjective Analysis
Subjective Analysis
Symptoms
History
Simple scoring system can effectively represent this stage Ability to capture required information without complicating the process
Subjective Analysis
The presence of absence of any symptom is presented by one or zero in a ones-row symptom matrix:
Where X1 is the finding or symptom that can be either Absent or Present The Weight vector of n symptoms is given by a onecolumn matrix as follows:
Subjective Analysis
The multiplication of the one-row symptom matrix of every disease Ds by a one-column weight matrix yields the result of the symptoms scoring of this disease as follows:
Similar forms of equation can be used to asses the history array H with a similar weighting system WH for every history finding:
DH = H.WH
Simple Rule to every disease rule-base: IF Symptom-Score >50 AND History-Score >30 Then disease will be in the Probable_Diagnosis_List Upon obtainment of Ws and Wh the subjective rule base is complete
Classification
Classification
Unclassified diseases
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Objective Analysis
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Objective Analysis
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Objective Analysis
Classification
Unclassified diseases Subjective Analysis Hypothesis reduction
Hypotheses
Objective Analysis
In Cardiology cases: 10 Disease category Subjective Analysis 75 specific final diagnoses Objective Analysis
Cardiac Classifications
Objective Analysis
Using labs and imaging studies to reduce the number hypotheses Creation of a probable diagnosis list Creating data sets for each classified disease
Objective Analysis
Creating an Acyclic graph for objective scoring
Objective Analysis
Disease name
Test Weights
Objective Tables Tables in many cases are big Cannot be used to deal with missing information A method that can be used to create rules from such tables Inability to process missing information Fuzzy Logic
Membership functions
Examples: Number of rules in Aortic Stenosis reduced from 1728 to 20 fuzzy rules Number of rules in Unstable Angina reduced from 2304 to 24 fuzzy rules
Bayesian Decisions
Decision in the probable diagnosis list Calculating the risk of the decision Calculating the error of diagnosis
Prior probabilities
True state of disease: True state of disease: Simple Diagnosis rule based on a shared feature
Diagnosis spaces
32
33
Decision in Cardiomyopathies
Decision in Cardiomyopathies
Case Study 2:
Class: Vulvular Heart Diseases Diseases: Tricsupid Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation
Class: Vulvular Heart Diseases Diseases: Tricsupid Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation
Class: Vulvular Heart Diseases Diseases: Tricsupid Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation
Overview
Suggested Architecture