Voice: "It is known cancer-causing stuff" Can you please provide the positive proof by which you make

those kinds of statements? 1. World Health Organization (WHO) classifies Electromagnetic Pulse Radiation as more than likely to be Cancer Causing. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf ARC Classification: On May 31, 2011, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. The National Cancer Institute suggests that the IARC classification fits with the handful of positive reports but overall inconsistent data concerning human carcinogenicity. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) FAQ about RF Safety: In the case of cellular and PCS cell site transmitters, the FCCs RF exposure guidelines recommend a maximum permissible exposure level to the general public of approximately 580 microwatts per square centimeter. : http://www.fcc.gov/guides/human-exposure-rf-fields-guidelines-cellular-and-pcs-sites & http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/rf-faqs.html & http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/ Sweden recognizes Electromagnetic Sensitivity as a life threatening disability. http://www.feb.se/index_int.htm Electro- hypersensitivity (EHS) is a recognized disability in Sweden. http://www.es-uk.info/info/sweden.asp & http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/niemr/ehs.php The exposure limits for EMF fields developed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) - a non-governmental organization formally recognized by WHO, were developed following reviews of all the peer-reviewed scientific literature, including thermal and nonthermal effects. The standards are based on evaluations of biological effects that have been established to have health consequences. http://www.who.int/peh-emf/standards/en/ OSHA protection guidelines allow only up to 6 minutes and up to 30 minute occupational exposure limits. www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation/index.html#standards EMP are Weapons of warfare designed to Kill humans and is Chinas weapon of choice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_weapon & http://www.earthpulse.com/src/category.asp?catid=1 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jul/21/beijing-develops-radiation-weapons/?page=all http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/u-s-intelligence-confirms-chinese-emp-weapons-programdubbed-assassins-mace_07222011

2.

3.

4.

5. 6.

Wireless radiation technology has been developed by the military. EMP Electromagnetic Pulse Radiation weapons are the weapons of choice for todays military arsenal. Electromagnetic Pulse weapons of warfare : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB46iP--NcQ Report: China building electromagnetic pulse weapons for use against U.S. carriers Read more: Report: China building electromagnetic pulse weapons for use against U.S. carriers - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jul/21/beijing-develops-radiation-weapons/?page=all THE VERY REAL THREAT OF EMP ATTACK (TRUNEWS) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhnyGc9GGis Bill Forstchen explains in great detail what every American would soon face should an enemy force ever strike the United States with an EMP attack and Dr. Devra Davis warns us about the harmful side effects attributed to the use of cell phones http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhnyGc9GGis&feature=player_embedded 7. 8. Center for ElectroSmog Prevention Docs: http://www.electrosmogprevention.org/ My EMF collection of documents: http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/3126951

Electromagnetic Radiation is LETHAL over timePeople are reporting symptoms near cell towers and in proximity to other RFR-generating sources including consumer products such as wireless computer routers and Wi-Fi systems that appear to be classic microwave sickness syndrome, also known as radiofrequency radiation sickness. First identified in the 1950s by Soviet medical researchers, symptoms included headache, fatigue, ocular dysfunction, dizziness, and sleep disorders. In Soviet medicine, clinical manifestations include dermographism, tumors, blood changes, reproductive and cardiovascular abnormalities, depression, irritability, and memory impairment, among others. The Soviet researchers noted that the syndrome is reversible in early stages but is considered lethal over time (Tolgskaya et al. 1973). http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Blake_Levit-Henry_Lai.pdf

1. http://www.scribd.com/doc/54548018/Lai-and-Levitt-Biological-Effects-From-Exposure-toElectromagnetic-Radiation-Emitted-by-Cell-Tower-Base-Stations-and-Other-Antenna-Arrays2010http://www.scribd.com/doc/59402425/Bio-Effects-e-Mr-Cell-Tower-Levitt-Lai?in_collection=3126951

Microwave Frequency
The table below shows a comparison of guidance from various authorities for the frequency of 1800 MHz. In fact, the more precautionary levels are usually specified to cover all the mobile phone and digital cordless phone frequencies. The varying levels in the ICNIRP table were primarily due to the heating effects of radiofrequency radiation and as the more precautionary levels are below measurable heating, there is no need for different values for different frequencies.

As 'volts per metre' is not a unit that most people are familiar with, we have arbitrarily taken the 1998 Salzburg level of 0.6 V/m as being 'equivalent to' a 30 mph vehicle speed limit in residential areas and then scaled the other levels relative to this. It is easy to see that the ICNIRP guidance is not very precautionary. 1800 MHz Public Exposure Guidelines FCC (USA) OET-65 ICNIRP (1998), WHO Belgium (exc Wallonia) Italy (sum of frequencies) Russia, PRChina Switzerland, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg Belgium Wallonia Typical 100m from a base station (0.2 to 6 V/m) Vienna (sum GSM) Italy (single frequency) Salzburg 1998 (sum GSM) EU-Parl, GD Wissenschaft, STOA GSM (2001) Median level, 15 US cities 1977 (mainly VHF & TV) Salzburg GSM/3G outside houses (2002) Salzburg GSM/3G inside houses (2002) Burgerforum BRD proposal, waking areas (1999) Burgerforum BRD proposal, sleeping areas (1999) Mobile phone handsets can work down to about Natural background level (all RF frequencies) Cosmic background at 1800 MHz average approx PFD W/m
2

Equivalent c.f. speed V/m 61 58 21 6 6 6 3 1.9 1.9 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.14 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.002 0.00003 0.00002 m.p.h. 3000 2847 1002 300 300 292 147 95 95 30 30 9 7 3 1 1 0.1 0.0015 0.001

10,000,000 9,000,000 1,115,000 100,000 100,000 95,000 24,000 10,000 10,000 1,000 1,000 100 48 10 1 1 0.01 0.000002 0.000001

0.00000000001 0.00000006 0.000003

Note that it is very rare indeed for broadcast radio signals to exceed 1 V/m inside residences, with VHF/UHF ones rarely exceeding 0.05 V/m, being typically less than 0.01 V/m. Mobile phones can work down to less than 0.00003 V/m. Note also that The Power Flux Density (PFD) value only converts into the volts/metre value for continuous signals (like VHF FM radio signals). PFD, by its definition, relates to the average power (ICNIRP specifies that it should be averaged over 6 minutes) and is often much lower in mobile phone mast (etc) signals than is found in the short peak signal strength in the pulsing radiation. Most precautionary authorities believe that it is the peak power than matters and that the V/m figure should be taken as the peak value that should be allowed.

On the available evidence, Powerwatch believes that signal strengths in bedrooms should be as low as possible and definitely below 0.05 V/m. The results from a study by some German GPs shows that adverse health symptoms were found in their patients at and above this level. See also our Bamberg story. A Spanish study also found significant health effects by 0.05 V/m - See here for more information. Levels below 0.05 V/m can be difficult to achieve, especially within a few hundred of metres of mobile phone masts. Some degree of screening is usually necessary.

Footnote:
It is easy to get confused by the many different units that are quoted. Here is a useful table, based on one found on the UK HPA-RPD website. Note that while the HPA-RPD website is very good for physics based factual information, Powerwatch believes that a far more precautionary response regarding involuntary human exposure is needed than the one currently expressed in public by the HPA-RPD. Characteristics of radiofrequency and microwave fields Quantity Frequency (oscillations per second) Wavelength (length of travelling wave) Electrical field strength Magnetic field strength Magnetic flux density Power flux density Symbol f E H B S Unit hertz (Hz) metre (m) volt per metre (V/m) ampere per metre (A/m) tesla (T) watt per square metre (W/m2)

Dosimetric units (i.e. how to judge internal effects of exposure) watt per kilogram of tissue Specific energy absoption rate SAR (W/kg) Current density J ampere per square metre (A/m2)

1. Please read Just Say No to Big Brothers Smart Meters by Orlean Koehl found on the web or at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55484389/Just-Say-No-Big-Brothers-Smart-Meters 2) Smart Meters violate the Constitution of the state of California: Article 1, Section 1, "All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy." Violation of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: Rights to health and life and liberty and our childrens rights to life, liberty and procreation, the parents basic rights to rights and liberties regarding care and control of our childrens health and their continued well-being.

5) Smart Meter wireless technology enables private information on customers that can be sold & intercepted by 3rd parties, given to law enforcement to be used for purposes other than merely charging customers for electrical usage. Recommended web sites. www.smartmeterdangers.org http://www.w4ar.com/ www.refusesmartmeters.com www.stopsmartmeters.org http://emfsafetynetwork.org/