Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DISTRIBUTION SHEET
To Distribution Project Title/Work Order Analysis of The F l e x i b l e Receiver L i f t i n g Yoke and B l a s t S h i e l d Assembly (Tank 241SY101) (N2B2K) Name
MSlN
From
1 Page 1 of 1
ECN No.
NA
EDT/ECN Only
Text Only
L. D. Blackburn R. M. Boger J. S. Burgess C. E. Hanson F. H. Huang J. W. Lentsch T. C. Mackey M. J. Ostrom R. B. Pan G. A. R i t t e r H. T o f f e r Central F i l e s (2 Copies)
D3-E (3tCQIr-2)
LY- 7 0
H5-67 L4-90 H5-53 H5-09 H5-67 S7-15 S2-03 H5-68 H5-53 HO-36 HO-38 L8-04
X X
x
X X X.
.
XX
X
X
I
-X
DISCLAIMER
in electronic image products. Images ate produced from the best available original document.
Page 1 of
I
1 . ~ 0 ~
608 38
Distribution
5 Proj ./Prog./Dept./Div.: .
N2B2K
6 Cog. Engr.: .
NA
7 Purchase Order N . . o:
G. A. Ritter
NA
9. Equip./Conponent
NA
NA
N. o:
H-2-83687, Rev. 1
NA
I
(A1
Item
No.
NA
Impact Level
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160
NA
Analysis o f the F1 exi bl e Receiver Liftina Yoke and Blast Shi el d-Assembl y (Tank 241SY101)
SQ
Transrnittal
Disposition ;a n
lf;;
Disposition
er
1, 2, 3, or 4 (see
1. Approval
4. Review
(GI
KEY
Disposition (H) & (I) 1 Approved . 2. Approved wlcomment 3. Disapproved wlcomment
5. Post-Review
Reason
Dlap.
(K) Signature
(L) Date
(M) MSlN
(Jl Name
(Kl Signature
IL) Date
(MI MSlN
IE I :
(GI
(HI
Disp.
18.
'I
Representative for Receiving Organization '
20.
I 21.
Date
APPROVAL < i f rewired) Ltr. No. 11 Approved 11 Approved n/comnents [I Disapproved u/comnents
DOE
ED-7400-172-1(07/91)
RELEASE AUTHORIZATION
Document Number: Document Title: Release Date:
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160, REV 0
Analysis o f the Flexible Receiver Lifting Yoke and Blast Sheild Assembly (Tank 241SY101)
2 J28J95
This document was reviewed following the procedures described in WHC-CM-3-4 and is:
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein t o any s p e c i f i c comnercial product, process, o r service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, o r otherxise, does n o t necessarily c o n s t i t u t e o r imply i t s endorsement, recornnerdation, o r favoring by the United States G o v e r m n t o r any agency thereof o r i t s contractors o r subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best a v a i l a b l e copy. Available i n paper copy and microfiche. Printed i n the United States o f America. Available t o t h e U.S. Department o f Energy and i t s contractors from: U.S. Department o f Energy O f f i c e o f S c i e n t i f i c and Technical Information ( O S T I ) PO Box 62 .. Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (615) 576-8401 Available.to the public from: U.S. Department o f Comnerce National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 5285 P o r t Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: (703) 487-4650
MASTER.
A-6001 -400.2 (09/94) WEF256
SUPPORTING DOCUMENT
2.
Title
I
3.
Nurber
~~
1.
Total Pages
$25
0
Analysis o f the Flexible Receiver Lifting Yoke and WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Blast Shield Assembly (Tank 241SY101)
5.
Key Words
4 Rev No. .
6.
Author
Name:
Signature
Z a L
F. H. Huang
/
Organization/Charge Code
I 7.
8D430/N2B2K
*Abstract
The analysis of the l i f t i n g yoke and b l a s t shield assembly considers t h e bending s t r e s s , weld strength, and resistance of t h e lug hole t o t e a r o u t . The bending s t r e s s o f t h e l i f t i n g lugs is evaluated t o ensure t h a t they meet the requirements o f the American I n s t i t u t e for Steel Construction (AISC 1989). Also considered i n the calculations i s t h e capability o f the thick lugs t o withstand t h e weight of the pump together w i t h t h a t of the container and strongback during r o t a t i o n t o the horizontal position.
OSE AND USE OF DOCUMENT
10.
RELEASE STAMP
o f Energy F i e l d Office,
9.
Impact Level
SQ
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thercof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflcct those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. , -. .
_<..
T i report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States hs
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0 Analysis of the Flexible Receiver Lifting Yoke and B1 ast Shield Assembly (Tank 241SY101) December 1994
PREPARED BY:
I7H.I Huang',
*z ,
/ q0f l
Date /24d-99
Date /z/zL/pf
Date
I 7423h?
Westinghouse Hanford Company Hanford Operations and Engineering Contractor for the U. S. Department of Energy
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0 DESIGN VERIFICATION METHOD The need for design verification has been reviewed with the method selected as i ndi cated bel ow:
X
A1 ternate Cal cul ati ons Qual ification. Testing Formal Design Review
Independent Review
ii
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0 TYPICAL CHECKLIST FOR INDEPENDENT REVIEW Document Revi ewed WHC-SD-WM-DA- 160 Author F. H. Huanq
[&[I [d e 1 [ I e1 [A [ I
e1
[ I
cGl
. .
[ I
Data used in calculations explicitly stated in document. Data checked for consistency with original source information as appl i cab1e. Mathematical derivations checked i ncl udi ng dimensional consistency of results.
c J [ I e1
1 [dl
[ I [ I [d
Models appropriate and used within range of validity o r use outside range of established validity justified. Hand calculations checked for errors.
[&[I
[ I
[ I [ I [.I/
e 1 e 1 [jl
Code run streams correct and consistent with analysis documentati on.
e [ I [ I 4
[4 [ I [ I
Acceptability limits on analytical results applicable and supported. Limits checked against sources. Conclusions consistent with analytical results and appl icabl e 1imits.
Code output consistent with input and with results reported in analysis documentation.
Safety margins consistent with good engineering practices. Results and conclusions address all points required in the problem statement. Software QA Log Number N/A
/ /
eYl [ I [ I
[ 4 [ 1 [ I
MANDATORY
Date
I z/=/ 74
iii
.
1.0
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev 0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
............................... SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Lugs f o r L i f t i n g t h e Yoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Lugs f o r Securing t h e Yoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Lug f o r L i f t i n g t h e B l a s t S h i e l d Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTRODUCTION
'
CONTENTS
1 1
2
2
2
1 1
APPENDICES
iv
..
.'".<.W.
.... :.
'.'
.<
.ycI. < ..
-;
. I . .
........
%.' > L
.....
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0 Analysis of the Flexible Receiver Lifting Yoke and Blast Shield Assembly (Tank 241SY101)
1.0
INTRODUCTION
The f l e x i b l e receiver i s used t o maintain primary tank confinement and minimize waste s p i l l a g e during equipment removal from tank r i s e r s through pump pits. To remove t h e mixer pump, a crane i s used t o l i f t t h e l i f t i n g yoke ( H WC 1994a) t h a t i s connected t o t h e mixer pump. Before t h e pump is l i f t e d , a bag assembly w i t h a b l a s t shield ( H 1994b) is lowered over the l i f t i n g yoke and WC the mixer pump onto the load d i s t r i b u t i o n frame by t h e crane. During set up f o r pump removal, t h e l i f t i n g yoke will be s t a b i l i z e d v e r t i c a l l y by a yoke brace (WHC 1994c) while t h e crane i s disconnected from t h e yoke and connected t o the bag assembly. Each of t h e two components has four handling l u g s f o r l i f t i n g . After t h e mixer pump is pulled from the 241SY101 waste tank, i t will be inserted i n t o a v e r t i c a l container supported by a hydraulic strongback. The disposal container then i s lowered slowly t o the horizontal p o s i t i o n for transport. During t h e lowering of the container w i t h the pump, t h e l i f t i n g yoke remains attached t o the crane. A safety chain runs under the pump and is attached t o two t h i c k lugs o f the yoke. The s a f e t y chain prevents t h e yoke from bumping t h e flange of the container. The analysis i s t o ensure t h a t the l i f t i n g lugs have adequate strength. This supporting document reports on t h e s t r u c t u r a l analysis of t h e equipment based on requirements for s a f e t y c l a s s 3 (DOE-RL 1993a), t h e Manua7 of Stee7 Construction (AISC 1989), and the Hanford Hoisting and Rigging Manua7 (DOE-RL 1993b). 2.0 S M AY U MR
The analysis o f the l i f t i n g yoke and b l a s t shield assembly considers t h e bending s t r e s s , weld strength, and resistance of the l u g hole t o t e a r out. The bending stress o f the l i f t i n g lugs i s evaluated t o ensure t h a t they meet the requirements o f t h e American I n s t i t u t e for Steel Construction (AISC 1989). Also considered i n t h e calculations i s the capability of the t h i c k lugs t o withstand the weight o f the pump together w i t h t h a t o f t h e container and strongback during rotation t o t h e horizontal position.
3.0 DISCUSSION
The s t r u c t u r a l cal ;u1 a t i ons are based on the fol 1owing a1 1owabl e s t r e s s e s : 12,000 l!f/in f o r bending, tension, and bearing; 7,200 1b f / i n * for shear; 7,200 l b f / i n on e f f e c t i v e area f o r welds. According t o t h e Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manua7 (DOE-RL 1993b) , the allowable s t r e s s e s except allowable shearing s t r e s s a r e one-third o f y i e l d strength.
1
Four $-in.-thick lugs a r e welded on the 14- by 6-in. f l a t bar of t h e yoke The location o f t h e handling lugs i s symmetrical t o t h e center of gravi t y of t h e yoke when the yoke is l i f t e d horizontally. The calculations check t h e bending s t r e s s of the lugs when l i f t i n g w i t h o u t the use o f spreader beams. Also considered i n the analysis is t h e l i f t i n g load capacity of t h e lugs i n terms of tension, shear, bearing, and tear-out resistance (see Appendix A).
3.2
The t o t a l weight of t h e container and the pump i s approximately 80,000 l b ; the strongback weighs 30,000 l b . The lugs a r e designed on the basis of the reaction acting on the safety chain and the lugs from t h e t o t a l weight of container, pump, and strongback. The l u g s a r e full-penetration welded t o t h e yoke bar. Because t h e safety chain will bend the lugs inward, the analysis checks t h e bending of the lugs. Calculations show t h a t t h e bending s t r e s s o f a l u g 14-in thick i s acceptable (see Appendix A).
3.3 Lug f o r Lifting t h e Blast Shield Assembly
The weight o f each component of the b l a s t shield assembly i s estimated from drawing H-2-821387 (WHC 1994b). Although there a r e four l i f t i n g l u g s , the analysis assumes t h a t only two lugs share t h e t o t a l weight of t h e assembly. The assembly shall be l i f t e d by a 52-in. by 28-in. spreader bar w i t h four 15-ft-long cables. Because the dimensions o f the spreader bar i s close t o those of t h e assembly, the spreader bar l i f t s t h e lug of t h e assembly nearly v e r t i c a l l y . The thickness of the lug and t h e edge distance of t h e hole i n the lug a r e checked t o ensure adequate strength. The calculations appear i n Appendix B. 40 .
CONCLUSION
The calculations i n Appendices A and B show t h a t the + i n . - t h i c k lugs a r e qualified t o carry the weight o f the l i f t i n g yoke o r t h e b l a s t s h i e l d assembly. Also, the calculations determine t h a t t h e l+in.-thick lug i s s t r u c t u r a l l y adequate t o secure the container, pump and strong-back during rotation from 90' t o t h e horizontal p o s i t i o n .
50 .
REFERENCES
AISC
1989, Manua7 o f Stee7 Construction, N i n t h edition, American I n s t i t u t e f o r Steel Construction, Chicago, I11 inois.
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0
DOE-RL 1993a, Standard Arch-Civi 7 Design Criteria, Design Loads for Faci7itiesY Hanford Plant Standard SDC-4.1, Rev. 12, U.S. Department of Energy-Rich1 and Field Office, Richl and, Washington.
DOE-RL 1993b, Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manua7, DOE-RL-92-36, Department of Energy Richland Field Office, Richland, Washington.
WHC WHC WHC
U.S.
1994a, Mixer Pump Assemb7y Lifting Yoke, drawing H-2-83687, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richl and, Washington.
Rev. 1,
1994b, HMT-F7exib7e Receiver B7ast Shie7d Assemb7y, drawing H-2-821387, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington. 1994c, Structura7 Ana7ysis: F7exib7e Receiver Yoke Brace for the 241SY101 Mixer Pump, WHC-SD-WM-DA-157, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC-SO-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0
Appendix A
A- 1
DESIGN CALCULATION
Drawing ~ - 2 - 6 . 3 667,npa.1( 2 ) Doc. No.
,
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160
REV. 0
-.
( 5 ) Rev.
F/+&-
r-
W h ; b l e j'&p;v+~ :-k.h4J
I'
, -
V*&
(6 & b IY m
Date Date
- ._
~
6-844
t .
& A*
7/?)9+
BD-6400-060 1 (12187)
DESIGN CALCULATION
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160
REV. 0
BD-64004l60 1 (12/87)
DESiG N CALCULATION
(1) Drawing
(4) Building
/ ! - 2 - ~ 3 6 ~ 7jqp,w. I ,
.
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 REV. 0
( 2 ) Doc. No.
(7) Subject
LUG 41
Date Date
S-.k~-9q
?/Cy/+ /
4-
\-.
/
c
lk
DESIGN CALCULATI0
(1) Drawing /.-2 (4) Building
4
-9 76 87/ .p !11.1
( 2 ) Doc. No.
WHC-SD-WM-DAREV. 0
160
(7) Subject
Lu& oc
LI#;,~~J Yoke A ~ C 6 ) ~ HS P
I
(5) Rev.
7/7/+4
d-/cC-qG
pr -<
ED-6400-060 1 (12187)
DESlGN CALCULATION
(1) Drawing (4) Building
/+ 2 -8 3 68 3,
RCu./(2)Doc. No.
(5) Rev.
I60
OF A-8
ED-6400.060 1 (12187)
DESIGN CALCULATlOh
.. .
WHC-SD-WM-DA-~~~ REV. 0
( 7 ) Subject
(8) Originator (9) Checker
F# ,?&&A
,
6-r7-995
q&
(10)
: I
'
..
'
P-A
I"
e-
Ld
DE5 IG N CALCULATlOb
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 REV. 0
A -8
80-6400.060 1 (12187)
B-1
DESIGN CALCULATI0N
. *
I -
. A
0-a,
BD 6400.060 1 (12187)
DESIGN CALCULATION /7(-2-82/jp7,hI o (2) Doc. No. (4) Building (5) Rev. (7) Subject W -/;?ex/6/~ ~ e t &/As/ 5kiUld R ~ e
(8) Originator
(1) Drawing
OF B-5
(9) Checker
, e
Fd /4mrc%
r .
&I
7/~5/94
I ' ..
..
I ! "
' 1
'-
8-3
BO-6600.060 (12B7) 1
DESIGN CALCULATiON
(1) Drawing #-2-.$2/
- ~/h-;&e
3&7. Rm-o
WHC-SD-WM-DAREV. 0
(6)
160
5.At&..h
/
( 5 ) Rev.
._ .PAGE B-4 - _.
2-21 - y $
OF B-5
Date
(9) Checker
4 F 5
Date
/Z/zZ/Fd
80-6000-060 (12i87) 1
D E5 I N CALCULATl ON G
(1) Drawing ~#-7-$?2/38 f l . 0 ( 2 ) Doc. No. 7. d (4) Building
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 REV. 0
PAGE B-5 OF B-5
(7) Subject
HMT0
( 8 ) Originator
&??
F/,,;b)'e H
&*-4
J
~ G S
(9) Checker
-&&L
/2--2)4+
I
t/ t
I
~ 95J j
= 3, 7F2 4k
.-
..o
0-5
ED-6400-060.1 (1 2.87)
' I
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160 Rev. 0
Appendix C Drawings
'
c- 1
SEE NoTt
OMFER 43.2 PL
ASS EM BLY
SCnLE: 3/16
%E
c
ss
t
WHC-SD-WM-DA-160
I
(UNW
REV. 0
GENERAL NOTES
OMERWISE SPECIFIED)
1
I I II
2 WELD AN0 INSPECT PER AWS Dl.1 M FMK P A S OF ALL Waos MT . DESIGMTED w a s aso= ANO'MIER LOAD TESTING m s s i u BE ~ ~ D O M l H M D ON AN APPROMD INSPECTION ooCUMo\ri. WELD WRCATlONS PER W E SCTlON Ly AAE AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTK)N.
3 FIAT BAA. PIATE, AND !jTIWXURAl. %APES SHALL COFORM TO ASTM A38 . A108 GR 101% CARBON SmL ROUND BAR SHKL CONFORM TO
4. IDENiIFY ASSEMBLY WITH ORAWING NUMNBER AN0 ORAWiffi
mwnw WCATEO ON THE DRAWING. CHARMERS HlGH AND SHKL BE PAINTED WH R L K K EFurtEL T I
I ME N
SOD
8. PANT 'WACilY 20 TONS IN THE LOCATKIN INOlCATED ON BOTH SlDES OF THE UmNG PLATE CHARKIlERS SHALL BE 2 HKW AND Stl4.L ' BE BUCK ENWEL ON A YELUrn PUMU BACKCROUND.
7 THE ASSEMSLY SWU BE LOAD TESTED Wi HANFORO HMSnffi , 4 RIGGWG . 40 WUKWHC-CM-~~-+. IF THE ASSEMBLY FAILS m PASS THE UUD TEST, NECESSART REPARS SHUL BE MADE AN0 THE UUD TEST R P T O ANY EU E REPNRS MADE m THE WWNG mu. REPUIRE RE-INSPECWN OF *E
WELDS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SH4J-L FIELO MRlM THE REQUIRE0 LENGTH OF THE m s i m BARS PRIOR m FMRICAW TO ASSURE THE NECDURY CLWRANCE FOR THE MIXER PUMP ASSEMBLY.
0. THE CONTRACTOR SWLL MRIW THE WIDTH RmyEEN THE NEW UTnNG WGS ON THE MISING PUMP W G E R D U R E FARRlCAnON OF M E UmNC YOKE TO ASSURE PROPER MGNHENT *NO FIT-UP BEWEEN THE LIFTING LUGS OH THE MISTING PUMP FLANGE AND THE UmNG LUGS ON THE UFTIffi YOKE.
L,'
3 1/2
pL+7
L / 8 aAR
T
BAR. b x 1 .
/-MT
----_ FF==@-
\-!l3/16
F O R R E F E R E N C E ON
. I _ -
F
f
(1.-11
we)
24
1 1/2
1 1/2
PLATE. 2- THICK
PLATE,
THK
/ 7 1
DETAIL
RETAMWC PLATE,
5 00 x 2 1/16
D
H)
x 1/4 M K
@E &%
1 1
/M -T
' li2
2r FIAT W.1 X 1 .
PL
_-?
--
fl
C %i & gE
M
2 PLACES
FLAT W , 1 1/2 t Sx
FlAT
8AR. b x
1 1/2
SECTION
SCALE 1/4 SIZE
FOR REFERENCE O N L Y
FOR GENERAL NOTES SEE SHEET 1
=--a
ir
ii
i i
0BLAST
SCVE: 1/8
SHIELD ASSEMBLY
GENERAL NOTES:
IOEN~M ASSEMBLY wrr~DRAWING NUMBEX Pmr NUMBER A N D R M S l O N NUMBER PER HS-BSs-oOlS E ' % 2 USE 1/2 INCH HIGH CtWAXG?S. LOCATE WPROX 'MERE SHOW. CONTAINHD(T 3AG ( E M 2) fOlDk3 IN APPSOX C FOLDS TO COMPREjS ONTO THE BUST S h l W (mrC 3).
KK;X