0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
19 vues1 page
17 u.s.c. 115(c)(3)(A)(i) for digital phonorecord deliveries made or authorized after December 31, 1997. The Digital Performance Act established a process that may take two-steps for determining the terms and rates. The first step is a voluntary negotiation period initiated by The Librarian of Congress.
17 u.s.c. 115(c)(3)(A)(i) for digital phonorecord deliveries made or authorized after December 31, 1997. The Digital Performance Act established a process that may take two-steps for determining the terms and rates. The first step is a voluntary negotiation period initiated by The Librarian of Congress.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
17 u.s.c. 115(c)(3)(A)(i) for digital phonorecord deliveries made or authorized after December 31, 1997. The Digital Performance Act established a process that may take two-steps for determining the terms and rates. The first step is a voluntary negotiation period initiated by The Librarian of Congress.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS phonorecord deliveries made or deliveries could be negotiated through
authorized under a compulsory license voluntary agreement, and requested that Copyright Office on or before December 31, 1997, is the the Library vacate the new schedule to same rate in effect for the making and allow sufficient time for such [Docket No. 96–4 CARP DPRA] distribution of physical phonorecords. negotiations. The Library vacated the Digital Phonorecord Delivery Rate 17 U.S.C. 115(c)(3)(A)(i). For digital new schedule on February 3, 1997. 62 Adjustment Proceeding phonorecord deliveries made or FR 5057 (February 3, 1997). The parties authorized after December 31, 1997, the did reach a voluntary agreement and, AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Digital Performance Act established a pursuant to the rules, the Library Congress. process that may take two-steps for published the proposed rates and terms ACTION: Notices of intent to participate. determining the terms and rates. 17 for digital phonorecord deliveries for U.S.C. 115(c)(3)(A)(ii). The first step in SUMMARY: The Library of Congress is public comment. 62 FR 63506 the process is a voluntary negotiation requesting that those parties interested period initiated by the Librarian of (December 1, 1997). In that notice of in participating in a Copyright Congress to enable copyright owners proposed rulemaking, the Library Arbitration Royalty Panel (‘‘CARP’’) and users of the section 115 digital specified that any party that objected to proceeding for establishing rates and phonorecord delivery license to the proposed rates and terms was terms for digital phonorecord deliveries negotiate the terms and rates of the required to file a Notice of Intent to file a Notice of Intent to Participate. license. The Librarian initiated this Participate and was expected to fully Those parties who have already filed period on July 17, 1996, and directed it participate in a CARP proceeding. 62 FR such a notice need not file again. to end on December 31, 1996. 61 FR 63507 (December 1, 1997). However, the DATES: Notices of Intent to Participate 37213 (July 17, 1996). Library did not call for the filing of are due July 31, 1998. The second step of the process is the Notices of Intent to Participate by convening of a CARP to determine parties other than those who objected to ADDRESSES: Notices of Intent to reasonable terms and rates for digital the proposed rates and terms. Participate, when sent by mail, should phonorecord deliveries for parties not be addressed to: Copyright Arbitration Two parties, the United States subject to a negotiated agreement. In the Royalty Panel (CARP), P.O. Box 70977, Telephone Association (‘‘USTA’’) and July 17, 1996, Federal Register notice, Southwest Station, Washington, DC the Coalition of Internet Webcasters the Library stated that CARP 20024. If hand delivered, they should be (‘‘Webcasters’’), opposed the proposed proceedings would begin, in accordance brought to: Office of the General terms and rates and filed Notices of with the rules of 37 CFR part 251, on Counsel, Copyright Office, James Intent to Participate. A third party, January 31, 1997. 61 FR 37214 (July 17, Madison Memorial Building, Room LM– Broadcast Music, Inc. (‘‘BMI’’), also filed 1996). The Library also directed those 407, First and Independence Avenues, a Notice of Intent to Participate in the parties not subject to a negotiated SE, Washington, DC. agreement to file their petitions to event that a CARP takes place. BMI’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: convene a CARP, as required by 17 interest is the relationship between David O. Carson, General Counsel, or U.S.C. 115(c)(3)(D), by January 10, 1997, digital phonorecord deliveries and the William Roberts, Senior Attorney for and their Notices of Intent to Participate public performance right. Compulsory Licenses, Copyright in CARP proceedings by January 17, Arbitration Royalty Panels, P.O. Box 1997. Id. In addition, the Library Notices of Intent To Participate 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, directed interested parties to comment DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8380. The parties in this proceeding by November 8, 1996, on the possibility Facsimile: (202) 707–8366. of consolidating the CARP proceeding to continue to negotiate in an effort to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: determine terms and rates for digital reach agreement as to the terms and phonorecord deliveries with the rates for digital phonorecord deliveries. Background proceeding to adjust the mechanical In the event that a CARP becomes On November 1, 1995, Congress royalty rate for the making and necessary, participating parties must be passed the Digital Performance Right in distributing of physical phonorecords. identified. Because earlier deadlines for Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (‘‘Digital 61 FR 37215 (July 17, 1996). the filing of Notices of Intent to Performance Act’’). Public Law 104–39, On November 8, 1996, the Library Participate were vacated at the parties’ 109 Stat. 336. Among other things, it received a joint motion from the request, Notices have yet to be filed in confirms and clarifies that the scope of Recording Industry Association of this proceeding, save those filed by the compulsory license to make and America (‘‘RIAA’’), the National Music USTA, Webcasters and BMI. distribute phonorecords of nondramatic Publishers’ Association, Inc. (‘‘NMPA’’), Consequently, the Library is instructing musical compositions includes the right and The Harry Fox Agency, Inc. (‘‘Harry those parties (other than USTA, to distribute or authorize distribution by Fox’’) to vacate the scheduled dates Webcasters and BMI) who wish to means of a digital transmission which appearing in the July 17, 1996, Federal participate in a CARP proceeding to constitutes a ‘‘digital phonorecord Register notice for convening a CARP. establish rates and terms for digital delivery.’’ 17 U.S.C. 115(c)(3)(A). A The Library vacated the schedule on phonorecord deliveries to file a Notice ‘‘digital phonorecord delivery’’ is December 11, 1996, and established a of Intent to Participate by July 31, 1998. defined as each individual delivery of a new precontroversy discovery schedule phonorecord by digital transmission of and date for the filing of Notices of Dated: June 24, 1998. a sound recording which results in a Intent to Participate. 61 FR 65243 David O. Carson, specifically identifiable reproduction by (December 11, 1996). General Counsel. or for any transmission After publication of the new schedule, [FR Doc. 98–17478 Filed 6–30–98; 8:45 am] recipient. * * ’’ 17 U.S.C. 115(d). representatives of the RIAA, NMPA and BILLING CODE 1410–33–U The Digital Performance Act Harry Fox informed the Library that established that the rate for all digital terms and rates for digital phonorecord