Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 88

APBI

ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION


Zvi Bernstein M.D. Zina Memorial Lisod Cancer Hospital

History
Radical mastectomy Halsted (10%LF) Simple mastectomy (10% LF) Lumpectomy + WB XRT (10% LF) Partial breast irradiation ( ?????) Lumpectomy alone 25-40% LF
2 LISSOD 23.06.2009

1970

2000

Maximal tolerable treatment

Minimal effective treatment

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Novel approaches to the treatment of breast cancer


Systemic therapy:
Novel prognostic parameters Hormonal therapy New chemotherapeutic agents Targeted therapies

Local therapy: Surgery (BCS, SLNBx) Radiation therapy (APBI)


4 LISSOD 23.06.2009

Breast Cancer: Critical Benchmark Studies


NASBP (NEJM 2002: 347 1233-1241) 20 year F/U shows lumpectomy + XRT 14% LRR lumpectomy alone 39.2% LRR Milan (Ann Oncol 2001 12 : 997-1003) Quadrantectomy + XRT 5.8% LRR Quadrantectomy alone 23.5% LRR Meta-Analysis from Lancet 12/05

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Meta-Analysis Data on Breast Radiotherapy strongly suggests that in addition to improving local control, radiotherapy ALSO improves survival

LISSOD

23.06.2009

The Standard: Whole breast lymphatic drainage irradiation:

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Conventional Breast Irradiation


5 - 6.5 weeks Good excellent cosmetic results Minimal toxicity Local control rates > 90% EORTC 22881 (Bartelink et al, NEJM 2001) > 50 yrs: 1.4% - 3% < 50 yrs: 10%

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Partial Breast Irradiation: Why ?

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation


(APBI):
Definition
Delivery of larger doses/fx of RT to the lumpectomy cavity after BCS in patients with early stage BC using BT , EBRT or IORT. Complete RT in 1- 5 days instead of 6-7wks

10

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI: Scientific Rationale


Distribution of tumor cells confined to a limited area of 1-2 cm around the index lesion and most local recurrences occur at or near the tumor bed Rate of recurrences away from tumor bed (elsewhere failure) equals rate of new primary cancers, or after lumpectomy followed by whole breast RT More convenient for the patient Less expensive (?)

11

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Question

Does the entire breast need to be treated?

12

LISSOD

23.06.2009

13

LISSOD

23.06.2009

> 50% of early invasive breast cancers may have limited extent

14

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI prerequisites:
Appropriate technology Appropriately selected patients Accurate target delineation Proven dose coverage QA

15

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Its a reality
Many centers in the US & Europe already carry out APBI on a regular basis

16

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Interstitial BT: Clinical Outcome


European experience, LDR/HDR, properly selected pts (397): Median FUP: 1-7 yrs LF: 2% (8/397)
EF: 1.3% (5)

Excellent/good cosmesis: 84%-92%

North American experience, LDR/HDR, properly selected pts (514): Median FUP: 23 91 mos 5 yr actuarial LF: 0% - 6% EF: 0% - 6%
Seminars Radiat Oncol, April 2005

17

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IORT with Electrons (ELIOT)


Instituto Europeo di Oncologia
1999 2003; median FUP: 20 mos # pts: 590; mean age: 59 yrs T < 2.5 cm Dose: 21 Gy (equivalent to 58-60Gy standard fx) Fibrosis: 19 pts (3.2%) LR: 3 pts (0.5%) Ipsilateral Ca: 3 pts (0.5%) Axillary LN mets: 1 pt (0.2%) Contralateral Ca: 5 pts (0.8%) Distant mets: 13 pts (2.2%) Deaths: 1 pt (0.2%)
Annals Surg 242: 101, 2005
18 LISSOD 23.06.2009

IORT with Electrons (ELIOT)


Instituto Europeo di Oncologia
Update: Saint Gallen Meeting, March 2008 LR 0.5% ER 0.5% Exactly the same as in 2007

19

LISSOD

23.06.2009

RTOG 95-17 (Phase II, MS-BT after Lumpectomy)


Toxicity Analysis
Study period: 1997-2000 Number of patients: 100 (evaluated: 99) LDR: 33 HDR: 66 Median follow-up: 2.7 yrs (range: 0.6-4.4 yrs) Grade 3-4 Acute Toxicity: LDR: 9% HDR: 3% Grade 3 Late Toxicity: LDR: 18% HDR: 4% Greater rate of Gr 3 toxicity in pts receiving chemotherapy
Kuske RR et al. IJROBP 65:45-51, 2006
20 LISSOD 23.06.2009

Leading Phase III Trials of APBI


Trial NSABP B-39 RTOG 0413 T 0-1-2 (< 3 cm) N 0-1 (< 3 + LN) TARGIT T < 3 cm; N 0 ELIOT T < 2.5 cm UK import low GEC-ESTRO Target accrual 3000 Partial breast test arms Multi-source Ir-192 (34 Gy) Single source I-192 (34 Gy) 3D-EBRT (38.5 Gy/10 fx) Time 5d 5d 5-10d

2232

IORT x-rays (20 Gy, surface)

1d

2000

IORT electrons (21 Gy, @ 90%)

1d

2100 1170

IMRT Multi-source Ir-192 (HDR) Multi-source Ir-192 (PDR)

3w 4d 3d

RAPID 21

( OCOG )

2128 LISSOD

3D CRT (38.5Gy/10 fx)

5-8d 23.06.2009

NSABP B39-RTOG 0413 Trial


Clear definitions of Patient eligibility (age - > 18 !!!) Pathology assessment Radiology assessment RT target volumes RT dose fractionation schedule RT technique End points (LRC, OS, DFS, cosmesis, toxicity, QOL)

3/05: Opened for accrual: 4/06: 1100 pts, 250 Depts

22

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Intensity Modulated & Partial Breast Radiotherapy (IMPORT) Trial

IMPORT LOW Trial (N=1935)


Control Test 1 Test 2

40Gy/15Fr
24

40Gy/15Fr 36Gy/15Fr
LISSOD

40Gy/15Fr
23.06.2009

Budapest Phase III Trial (1998-2004)


# patients: 258 T 1 N 0-1 mic Non lobular, no EIC 50Gy WBI Vs 7x5.2Gy HDR BT or 50Gy localized field, by electrons Median FUP: 60 months Local control: ~ 95% in both arms OS,CSS,DFS no difference Better cosmetic outcome in PBI arm

Polgar, ESTRO 25, October 2006, Leipzig


25 LISSOD 23.06.2009

APBI: Open Questions


Patient selection (criteria?) Optimal technique ? Optimal schedule (BED values !) Volume definition (QA !) Long term local control ? Risk of long term toxicity ?

26

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Patient Selection Criteria

27

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Patient Selection Critical Issue !!


Absence of calcifications/tumor density beyond 1cm from index lesion on mammography Absence of tumor foci in outer 1cm of the surgical margin on pathology Non multi-centric or EIC ++ tumor on imaging/pathology 2 cm grossly tumor free surgical margin 5-10 mm histologically tumor free margin

Holland, ESTRO 25, Leipzig

28

LISSOD

23.06.2009

If carefully selected
Accuracy of identifying Breast Cancer with Limited Extent may be as high as 90%

29

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI: Patient Selection

ABS: Age > 45 yrs Invasive duct Ca only Tu size < 3 cm Negative margins Negative axilla

Amer Soc Breast Surgeons: Age > 50 yrs Invasive duct Ca or DCIS Tu size < 2 cm Microscopic margins>2 mm Negative axilla

30

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI: Exclusion Criteria

Extensive intra-ductal component Positive axillary nodal status Infiltrating lobular histology DCIS (?) * Young age
Am Soc breast Surg MammoSite Clinical trial for DCIS

Annals Surg Oncol 13:967, 2006

31

LISSOD

23.06.2009

DiFronzo, L. A. et al. Arch Surg 2005;140:787-794.


32 LISSOD 23.06.2009

Targeted intra-operative radiation therapy TARGIT

33

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Targit Patient Selection


Eligibility criteria Age 40 or over (ELIOT: > 48 yrs) Invasive breast cancer 3 centimeters or less (ELIOT: < 2.5 cm) Treatable with lumpectomy Exclusion criteria Bilateral cancer, history of cancer in the same breast Multifocal or multicentric breast cancer Extensive non-invasive cancer (DCIS) Evidence of lymph node metastasis Collagen diseases,other contraindications to breast RT

34

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IMPORT LOW: Inclusion Criteria


Age 50 Primary breast conservation Unifocal 2.0 cm Invasive adenocarcinoma (lobular ca excluded) Grade 1 or 2 Microscopic clearance 2 mm Node negative No lymphovascular invasion No concomitant CT allowed (sequential CT allowed)

35

LISSOD

23.06.2009

RAPID Patient Selection


Age > 40 T < 3 cm Invasive carcinoma (non lobular !) or DCIS Non multifocal - multicentric Clear resection margins Negative axilla (dissection or SLN BX) No BRCA carrier

36

LISSOD

23.06.2009

TECHNIQUE

37

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI: Techniques
HDR-BT Balloon catheter BT (MammoSite) Multi-catheter interstitial BT EBRT 3D CRT IMRT IORT Orthovoltage (50 kv, spherical device) Electrons Brachyterapy

38

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Advantages of Interstitial BT
Final pathology report available Final microscopic margins Axillary nodal status Optimal coverage of tumor bed (with CT guided insertions)

39

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Ultrasound-guided needle insertion

40

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Typical catheter distribution with supine ultrasound guidance

41

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Open Cavity Technique

42

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Prone Patient Position

43

LISSOD

23.06.2009

MammoSite

44

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IORT
Advantage: Local treatment Surgery, Sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy and RT is completed in ONE DAY Disadvantages: Single large dose (BED ?) Lack of final pathology results QA - difficult Lack of long term follow-up

45

LISSOD

23.06.2009

3D - IMRT

Advantage: Availability Disadvantage: Larger volume exposed to RT

46

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Dose - Schedule

47

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI: Dose/schedule
HDR - Brachytherapy 32-34 Gy/8-10 fx/4-5 days (= 55 Gy/120-144 hrs, LDR) IORT Electrons (IOERT): 21 Gy/1 fx X-rays (50 kv.) 20 Gy/1 fx @ surface 5.0 Gy/1 fx @ 1.0 cm 0.2 Gy/1 fx @ 0.2 cm

48

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IOERT: Radiobiological Considerations (1)


Giving IOERT immediately after surgery may avoid the problem of accelerated repopulation Tissues treated during surgery still have rich vasculature and aerobic metabolism (before postoperative changes), which make them more sensitive to radiation (oxygen effect)

49

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IOERT: Radiobiological Considerations (2)


According to the linear-quadratic model and assuming the following alpha-beta ratios: - breast tumor cells = 10 - late responding tissues = 3 21 Gy/1fx = 56Gy/28fx in terms of local control 21 Gy/1 fx = 100 Gy/50 fx (!!) in terms of late effects in normal tissues

50

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IORT (electrons and low energy x-rays):


Long Term Complications ?
Skin ? Subcutaneous tissues (fibrosis) ? Ribs (bone necrosis) ? Lung (pneumonitis; 2nd primary tumor) ? Heart ? - Mostly short term toxicity data available - Information at present time is lacking and is based on animal studies and radiobiological assumptions and estimations - Long term follow up needed !

51

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Volume Definition
Still an open question !

52

LISSOD

23.06.2009

NSABP-RTOG Guidelines

CTV is + 15 mm in interstitial multi-catheter BT + 10 mm in Mammo-Site + 15 mm in 3D CRT (+ 10 mm to PTV)

53

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI at RAMBAM HCC


HDR interstitial BT IOERT EBRT 3D CRT

54

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Criteria for patient selection:


Age > 60 (> 50 , according to recent amendment) Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. < 2 cm in greatest diameter by pathology. Without EIC. Resection with negative margins > 2 mm. Positive Estrogen/Progesterone receptors (not required, according to recent amendment) Negative axillary lymph nodes (by axillary dissection or SLNB). Patients informed consent.

55

LISSOD

23.06.2009

HDR interstitial BT at RHCC

56

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI by HDR-BT at RHCC: Principles of Technique


CT scan for target volume definition and delineation. Implant geometry designed according to the rules of Paris System. Nucletron RABBIT template for needle insertion, under local anesthesia.

57

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Paris System Rules

58

LISSOD

23.06.2009

59

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Target volume definition and delineation

60

LISSOD

23.06.2009

61

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Virtual planning

62

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Interstitial Implant

63

LISSOD

23.06.2009

64

LISSOD

23.06.2009

65

LISSOD

23.06.2009

66

LISSOD

23.06.2009

67

LISSOD

23.06.2009

68

LISSOD

23.06.2009

69

LISSOD

23.06.2009

70

LISSOD

23.06.2009

TREATMENT PLANNING

71

LISSOD

23.06.2009

72

LISSOD

23.06.2009

CT Treatment Plan and 2D orthogonal films

73

LISSOD

23.06.2009

74

LISSOD

23.06.2009

75

LISSOD

23.06.2009

76

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Post-implant CT verification

77

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Outcome and Toxicity

78

LISSOD

23.06.2009

IOERT
Intra-Operative Electron Beam Radiation Therapy

79

LISSOD

23.06.2009

80

LISSOD

23.06.2009

81

LISSOD

23.06.2009

82

LISSOD

23.06.2009

83

LISSOD

23.06.2009

84

LISSOD

23.06.2009

External Beam APBI (1)

85

LISSOD

23.06.2009

External Beam APBI (1)

86

LISSOD

23.06.2009

APBI - Conclusions:
5 yr results with APBI have so far produced excellent results: In appropriately selected patients High quality RT delivery and reproducibility required Additional studies needed to clarify: Better selection of candidates Required treatment margins Technical aspects Best technique for each setting

87

LISSOD

23.06.2009

88

LISSOD

23.06.2009

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi