Area imposed load (assume) type of soil (assume) Thickness slab Thickness hardcore Desing span, L Diameter of depression

(Assume) fu Mu Effective depth, d width, b Mu bd

= = = = = = =

30.48m X 121.92m 10 kN/m2 medium denses sand 0.25 0.6 2 2 m m m m

= = = = =

24.4 31.232 227 1000 0.606

kN/m2 kNm/m mm mm

Plan on depression at unsupported corner of slab one -way spanning ( B or C mesh) UDL = = 0.32 fu L 31.232

kNm/m

two-way spanning ( A mesh) UDL = = 0.16 fu L 15.616

kNm/m

As

= =

0.16 % bd mm/m 363

BS8110:part 3: chart 2

Load (kN/m2) 10 15 20 25

As 363 499 590 704

T12 @ 250 c/c, As = 452 mm2/m T12 @ 200 c/c, As = 566 mm2/m T12 @ 175 c/c, As = 646 mm2/m T12 @ 150 c/c, As = 792 mm2/m

Area imposed load (assume) type of soil (assume) Thickness slab Thickness hardcore Desing span, L Diameter of depression (Assume) fu Mu Effective depth, d width, b Mu bd

= = = = = = =

30.48m X 121.92m 40 kN/m2 medium denses sand 0.25 0.6 2 2 m m m m

= = = = =

72.4 92.672 227 1000 0.899

kN/m2 kNm/m mm mm

Plan on depression at unsupported corner of slab one -way spanning ( B or C mesh) UDL = = 0.32 fu L 92.672

kNm/m

two-way spanning ( A mesh) UDL = = 0.16 fu L 46.336

kNm/m

As

= =

0.25 % bd mm/m 568

BS8110:part 3: chart 2

Load (kN/m2) 10 20 30 40

As 182 318 430 568

T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 250 c/c, As = 452 mm2/m T12 @ 175 c/c, As = 646 mm2/m

Area imposed load (assume) Type of soil (assume) Thickness slab Thickness hardcore Desing span, L Diameter of depression (Assume) fu Mu Effective depth, d width, b

= = = = = = =

30.48m X 121.92m 40 kN/m2 B- Consistent soil type but variable density 0.25 m 0.6 m 1.4 m Fig K1 2 m Table 13.1

= = = =

72.4 45.409 227 1000

kN/m2 kNm/m mm mm

Plan on depression at unsupported corner of slab one -way spanning ( B or C mesh) UDL = = 0.32 fu L 45.409

kNm/m

two-way spanning ( A mesh) UDL = = = 0.16 fu L 22.705 0.881

kNm/m

Mu bd

As

= =

0.21 % bd mm/m 477

BS8110:part 3: chart 2

Load (kN/m2) 10 20 30 40

As 182 318 431 477

T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 250 c/c, As = 452 mm2/m T12 @ 200 c/c, As = 566 mm2/m

Area Imposed load type of soil Thickness slab Thickness hardcore Desing span, L Diameter of depression (Assume) fu fu Mu Mu Effective depth, d width, b

= = = = = = =

30.48m X 121.92m 65 kN/m2 gravel 0.25 m 0.6 m 1.5 m 2 m

Assume Table 13.1

Figure K1 Table 13.1

= = = = = =

1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk 112.4 kN/m2 0.32 fu L 80.928 227 1000

kNm/m mm mm

Plan on depression at unsupported corner of slab One -way spanning ( B or C mesh) UDL = = 0.32 fu L 80.928

kNm/m

Two-way spanning ( A mesh) UDL = = = 0.16 fu L 40.464 0.785

kNm/m

Mu bd

As

= =

0.21 477

% bd mm/m

BS8110:part 3: chart 2

By try and error Load (kN/m2) 10 20 30 40 50 60 As 91 136 182 250 341 363

T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm2/m

65

477

T12 @ 200 c/c, As = 452 mm2/m

As a result, allowable load is 60 kN/m2

PROJEK:

PROPOSED UPGRADING OS SUNKEN FLOOR AT SHEDS C2, C3 & C5, CONVENTIONAL YARDSTORE, CONTAINER TERMINAL 2 (CT2) STRUCTURE: STRUCTURAL CHECK FOR NON SUSPENDED SLAB DIKIRA OLEH: DISEMAK OLEH: Mohd Zulhafiz Che Kamarudin Ir Shahabuddin Baginda Basir
CALCULATION

NO. RUJ: MUKA: 1

TARIKH: 14/5/12
OUTPUT

REFFERENCE

1.0 Introduction The purpose of analysis is to check the capacity of the existing structural of non-suspended slab, constructed by the contractor 2.0 Structural information Area of non-suspended slab, Imposed load, Qk Type of soil Thickness slab, t (given by contractor) Concrete strength, fcu (given by contractor) Reinforcement (given by contractor) Thickness hardcore (given by contractor) Design span, L Diameter of depression Density of concrete, 3.0 Loading Design load, fu = = = = = = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk 40.4 kN/m2 0.32 fu L 29.088 kNm/m 227 mm 1000 mm Gk = xt

Figure K1 Table K.1 Structural foundation design manual by by curtins

= = = = = = = = = =

30.48m X 121.92m kN/m 20 gravel 0.25 m kN/m 40 T12 @ 250 C/C both way & top/bottom 0.6 m 1.5 m 2.0 m kN/m 24

Bending moment, Mu

Effective depth, d Width, b

Assuming depression at unsupported corner of slab, - One -way spanning ( B or C mesh) Assuming uniform distribution load acting on the floor, UDL = 0.32 fu L = 51.712 kNm/m - Two-way spanning ( A mesh) Assuming uniform distribution load acting on the floor, UDL = 0.16 fu L = 25.856 kNm/m Mu bd Area of reinforcement,As = = = 0.502 0.06 % bd 136 mm/m

BS8110

BS8110

BS8110 part 3: chart 2

PROJEK:

PROPOSED UPGRADING OS SUNKEN FLOOR AT SHEDS C2, C3 & C5, CONVENTIONAL YARDSTORE, CONTAINER TERMINAL 2 (CT2) STRUCTURE: STRUCTURAL CHECK FOR NON SUSPENDED SLAB DIKIRA OLEH: DISEMAK OLEH: Mohd Zulhafiz Che Kamarudin Ir Shahabuddin Baginda Basir

NO. RUJ: MUKA: 2

TARIKH: 14/5/12

REFFERENCE Assuming two way reinforcement,

CALCULATION

OUTPUT

By try and error, following the above calculation Assume Load As (kN/m) (mm/m) 10 91 20 136 30 182 40 250 50 341 60 363 65 477 Reinforcement provided T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm/m T12 @ 300 c/c, As = 377 mm/m T12 @ 250 c/c, As = 452 mm/m T12 @ 200 c/c, As = 566 mm/m

4.0 Conclusion As a result, with reference to the above table, the allowable load for the floor can cater is approximatly 60 kN/m