Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 45

Dans ce rapport:

Le Comit pour la Rpublique du Canada est fier de rditer le document Rpublique ou Colonie, qui rassemble les recherches historiques rvolutionnaires quavaient menes entre 2006 et 2008 les historiens Pierre Beaudry et Robert D. Ainsworth au sujet de deux priodes de lhistoire canadienne qui taient dfinies, dans un cas, par la tension qui mena la Rvolution amricaine de 1776, et dans lautre par celle qui mena la seconde Rvolution amricaine de 1861-1865. Le Projet dHistoire Canadienne, que fait progresser les contributions contenues dans ces rapports, vise dnouer le nud gordien des historiens rvisionnistes britanniques qui ont rendu impossible toute analyse honnte de la cration et de lvolution du Canada pour quiconque est concern par la recherche de la vrit. Beaudry et Ainsworth commencent leurs recherches non pas partir de prjugs permettant de rapicer les vnements et les dates comme on le voit le plus souvent de nos jours pour les projets dhistoire moderne; la mthode adopte par les auteurs de ces rapports se trouve plutt dans ce que Gottfried Leibniz appelle Analysis Situs, ou ltude des causes ncessaires. Cela est seulement possible si on comprend que cest le schisme entre deux conceptions du monde diamtralement opposes -celle de la tradition imprialisteoligarchique et celle de la tradition rpublicaine humaniste- qui a faonn le droulement de toute lhistoire humaine connue, mergeant certains moments cls de changements que nous appelons souvent des vnements historiques . On peut trouver des exemples modernes de ce phnomne dans lclosion dides scientifiques et artistiques qui a marqu la Renaissance florentine du 15 ime sicle, la Rvolution amricaine de 1776 et la victoire de Lincoln sur linsurrection de 1861-1865. De telles singularits, bien que situes dans lespace et le temps, expriment des fonctions auxquelles les scientifiques ont historiquement rfr comme tant universelles , lesquelles transcendent ces vnements spatiaux-temporels auxquels leurs existences ont donn naissance. Il est ncessaire davoir une sensibilit vis--vis de la nature de telles singularits pour comprendre la signification approprie des vnements qui les prcdent et les suivent incluant en dautres points spatiaux de la plante mme sils ne leur sont pas connects matriellement. Faute de possder une telle sensibilit, lhistorien se trouve rduit ntre quun chroniqueur peine capable de copier/coller ses propres prjugs subjectifs sur les vnements sans aucune relle proccupation pour la vrit. Trop souvent de tels chroniqueurs sont recruts consciemment ou non, pour devenir de simples propagandistes pour le programme dobscurcissement de lhistoire conu par des imprialistes . La vritable histoire du Canada apparat ainsi comme une consquence dvnements particuliers dfinit par les traditions de la Renaissance europenne qui ont reu une nouvelle vie en Amrique et par ces entits qui ont recherch dun point de vue existentiel anantir ces traditions, entits que nous appelons plus rcemment lEmpire britannique . Nous esprons que la comprhension de cette histoire fournira aux gnrations prsentes et futures le pouvoir de reconnatre le prsent comme un moment fcond pour lhistoire du futur.

Comit de rdaction
Matthew Ehret-Kump Jean-Philippe Lebleu

Avneet Thapar Pascal Chevrier David Gosselin Frederick Joly-Cayla Francois Lepine Robert Hux, Ph.D. Ilko Dimov Birgit Henker
Pour plus d'information, visitez:
www.committeerepubliccanada.ca Pour en savoir plus sur nos associs amricains du Comit d'Action Politique de LaRouche (LPAC), ainsi que de l'agence de presse Executive Intelligence Review, visitez: www.larouchepac.com www.larouchepub.com Pour contacter le Comit pour la Rpublique du Canada, crivez crclarouche@gmail.com o appelez au (514)-461-7209

Matthew Ehret-Kump

Rpublique o Colonie?

Table des matires

Les Consquences tragiques de lActe de Qubec de 1774....4

Cap louest jeune homme!.......................................................................9

Clmont Gosselin: Patriote canadien et rvolutionnaire amricain....17

Le Systme amricain au Canada.27

De la ncessit pour le Canada dun tunnel sous le dtroit de Bring Ou la philosophie des chemins de fer pour le XXIe sicle..41

While the minesweeping maneuver deliberately is not entering the Strait, an extremely crowded body of water where accidental encounter with the Iranians could well occur, that is no guarantee against such a conflict. An opinion piece by Washington Post senior columnist David Ignatius, "Lessons from an Iranian war game," underscored that point. Ignatius was permitted to observe the game, held in Washington, and including former top U.S. officials and prominent IranianAmerican experts, and his conclusion, undoubtedly shared by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was stark: "The game showed how easy it was for each side to misread the other's signals."

is for that reason that, in an unsigned Global Times editorial March 29, Beijing warned that "an overarching missile defense system would force China to change its long-held nuclear policy" of no first use of nuclear weapons. There are also moves "on the ground" in Asia that, while they seem to be merely local skirmishes, could prove to be provocations for larger confrontations in the current superheated international climate, specifically, the conflict between Japan and China over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Now, let's look at the Russian military preparations to deal with U.S./NATO moves.

For one thing, Ignatius puts President Obama, Russianhe assumes hasdescribed large-scale naval exercises in the Strait whom media coverage been re-elected, directly on of Hormuz (shown But he leaves it to theon a scale never before conthe side of war. here), aimed at Iran, as reader to ducted there: Muscle-flexing is in full strike heated up by bellicose rhetofill in the next step: that a U.S. swing, on Iran's ric, noted Channel One. nuclear facility, be it conventional or nuclear, will inevitably bring in Iran's ally and northern neighbor, Russia. U.S. and allied military deployments are not simply occurring around Iran, obviously. The move for regime change in Syria also represents a flashpoint for the Southwest Asia region, as Russia has repeatedly pointed out, and Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (ret.) elaborated in his answer to a question on the danger of World War III, in Rep. Walter Jones' press conference on Sept. 21 (see Feature). Israel itself, which cannot afford to take military action against Iran without American guarantees and backup, held surprise maneuvers on the border with Syria just last week. And then there's the Asia-Pacific region, where the recent trip by Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta resulted in an escalation of tensions with China and Russia, over his announcement of an agreement with Japan on stationing another missile defense station in that nation. Allegedly, such "defense" stations are aimed at "rogue states," in this case North Korea, but, as Russian and Chinese commentaries have pointed out, Japan is in no danger from North Korea's capability. The only conceivable reason for such a deployment is to further the encirclement of China, and, as in the case of the encirclement of Russia, render that nation's defenses against a first strike impotent. It

Russia1Practices Response to 'External Attack' FIGURE U.S./NATO Military Deployments Around Addressing Russian troops on Sept. 17, President Vladimir Putin spoke as commander-in-chief. "You have had excellent training and are literate people," he told them. "You see what is going on in the world and how, unfortunately, the use of force in international affairs is increasing. All of this means that we must keep our powder dry. We must increase Russia's defense capabilities." The occasion was the Kavkaz-2012 (Caucasus2012) military maneuvers in southern Russia, which Putin had just observed. In addition to such statements, the very nature of these and other military exercises being held this Autumn, as well as the President's focus on the defense sector during current intense federal budget deliberations, also make clear that the Russian leadership assumes that its country is threatened, and could be involved in serious combat at any moment.

Russia and China

Meeting on Sept. 21 with Defense Minister Anatoli Serdyukov and Chief of the Armed Forces General Staff Gen. Nikolai Makarov, to review the just-concluded Kavkaz-2012 program, Putin termed it "a massive undertaking," which produced good results in testing command and control, There areas weapons systems. Serdyukov detailed as well indications of Russian attention to the global scope of U.S. BMD planning, that is aimed against both Russia and China, different seen in this map.in southern Rusthat four as can be firing ranges sia were used, as well as sea and coastal areas on the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. Most incisive was General Makarov's characterization of the exercises as having "two very serious challenges," one of them explicitly related to the tense situation in the region.

One part of the scenario involved the potential deployment of the Armed Forces in conflicts within Russia, while the other was "resolving the problem of responding to an external attack." Kavkaz-2012 was preceded, earlier in the month, by command-staff exercises of the Strategic Missile Forces. Taking place Sept. 4-7, they involved 150 command points and 300 individual weapons and other military equipment. The official news agency Itar-TASS reported, based on a press announcement made Sept. 4 by Ministry of Defense spokesman Vadim Koval, that the participants would "hone their nuclear deterrence objectives for the event of an armed conflict with the participation of Russia." The term "nuclear deterrence objectives" refers to the ability of Russia's Strategic Missile Forces to "deter" a possible U.S. nuclear first strike against Russia, by their ability to inflict a retaliatory nuclear strike against the United States. Koval said that the scenarios involved "nuclear deterrence in the setting of a threatened armed conflict with Russia's participation, or during such a conflict." The purpose of this training, he added, "is to improve coordination among Strategic Missile Forces command agencies, as well as the practical skills of the command staff and operational groups in directing the military command agencies, units, and troops subordinate to them, including through the use of modern automated command-and-control systems."

By January 2012, Russian military sources were making it known that the September 2012 schedule of military exercises would feature complete, combined-arms integration. In particular, Nezavisimaya Gazeta's well-informed military analyst reported Jan. 17 that the Russian General Staff was mapping out "large-scale staff exercises based on a possible U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran"; this would happen in September, and would involve the Strategic Missile Forces. Furthermore, it was reported then, the script for Kavkaz-2012 would "differ from last year's exercises in this series, by being larger-scale and more closely approximating actual current military and political conditions," including a scenario of "a possible war by the U.S.A. and several other countries against Iran, as well as other possible conflicts in the Caspian and Southern Caucasus region." Throughout preparations for Kavkaz-2012, Russian defense sources described these exercises as "strategic." Russian and Georgian press reported that Russia had shifted the physical location of the training out of the Chechen Republic, in order to avoid giving Georgia's President Michael Saakashvili a pretext for any wild actions. On Sept. 5, RIA Novosti reported the announcement by another Russian Ministry of Defense spokesman, Alexander Kucherenko, that Russian airborne forces would be involved in 10 different exercises during the month, including Kavkaz-2012, and international maneuvers with Belarus and with the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

Long-Range Planning
The Russian decision to upgrade the particulars of these two, related sets of exercisesKavkaz-2012 and the Strategic Missile Forces training evidently followed close on the heels on two events in late 2011: the murder of Libyan leader Qaddafi in October; and then-President Dmitri Medvedev's public announcement in December, that diplomatic efforts to halt the U.S./NATO unilateral European Ballistic Missile Defense (Euro BMD) system from going ahead had been unsuccessful, that the Euro BMD was a strategic threat to Russia, and that it would be countered militarily.
Contrary to popular belief, Russian military capabilities are not to be likened to a rust-bucket

Ring Around Russia: Threats to a Great Power That Wont Back Down In the past, large surface ships have ventured into this region only if accompanied by an icebreaker, but lower Arctic ice levels have allowed the Northern Sea Route to be used more freely. For decades, surface ships of the Northern Fleet have left Murmansk only to the west, into the Atlantic, never sailing eastward along the Arctic coast. According to an article by Victor Savenkov for Svpressa.ru, the last time a large battleship was in the Kara Sea region was August 1942, when a German heavy cruiser sank the Soviet icebreaker Alexander Sibiryakov.

Svpressa.ru interviewed Russian naval experts on what the Pyotr Veliky's mission might be in the Kara Sea, given that it is not an antisubmarine warfare platform, and the type of surface ships it would potentially engage do not frequent the Arctic coast. Adm. Valentin Selivanov (ret.), former commander of Russia's Mediterranean Squadron, said that, besides taking advantage of the weather to reach relatively nearby training areas that were not previously so accessible, a major factor was "to demonstrate that we are prepared to defend our interests in the Arctic militarily."

President Putin told a conference on Strategic Nuclear that nuclear arms remain a truly important guarantee of Russias sovereignty and territorial integrity, Center for role in supporting global and regional equilibrium and Col. Anatoli Tsyganok, director of the and play a key stability

Military Forecasting, told Svpressa.ru that another reason might be the deployment of U.S. Aegisequipped ships in the Arctic, which would position them within striking distance of "the shortest trajectories of our ICBMs to the USA." The Aegis radar/ anti-missile system is the main component of the U.S. Euro BMD program, which Moscow identifies as a threat to its strategic nuclear deterrent. "It is not to be excluded," said Tsyganok, that the Pyotr Veliky's cruise is related to such concerns.

"The Americans are developing their BMD system in the north, just as in the south. Aegis-equipped ships regularly enter the Bering Strait," he asserted. "This is a threat to our security. Because it's one thing if BMD-equipped vessels appear along our southern borders and in the Mediterranean, but in the event of war, Russian missiles will fly to the USA across the North Pole. So it's another matter altogether, when such ships show up to the north of our country, and seek the ability to shoot down our missiles in the most vulnerable, boost phrase."

bility and efficacy of our nuclear potential, as well as our aerospace defence system." He said that "a significant part of financial resources within the state armament program" will be allocated to upgrading the Strategic Nuclear and Aerospace Defense Forces. "By 2020 the share of modern weapons in our Strategic Nuclear Forces should be at 75-80%, and for Aerospace Defence Troops this figure should be no less than 70%."

On July 30, Putin traveled to the northern city of Russian Severodvinsk in the Arkhangelsk Region, to speak President Putin, addressing troops Sept. 17, on the occaPrioritizing Military Industry sion of the a ceremony military exercises, noted somberly, You at Kazkav-2012 marking the beginning of construcsee whattion of Russia's fourth Borey-class nuclear ballistic is going on in the world and how, unfortunately, the use In July, Putin held meetings at his Summer resi- in international affairs is increasing. . . . We must increase of force submarine, over a meeting dence in Sochi, and took tours to key military -missile capabilities. and to preside here (center), obRussias defense Putin is shown on the future areas, for discussions on putting the Russian mili- the exercises. Navy construction program. In his serving tary-industrial complex into shape. On July 26, he remarks, Putin mentioned both the naval compomet with officers and officials in charge of Rus- nent of Russia's strategic nuclear forces, and the sia's Strategic Nuclear Forces and Aerospace Defense Troops. Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Ro- rebuilding of other components of the Navy to gozin, Minister of Industry Denis Manturov, Ros- defend areas such as the Arctic. cosmos head Gen. Vladimir Popovkin (ret.), and the director of the nuclear agency Rosatom, Sergei Kiriyenko, were in attendance, along with Ministry of Defense representatives. The Kremlin's announcement called it a "Meeting on Implementation of the State Armaments Program for Nuclear Deterrence," a reference to the thermonuclear weapons that would be fired at the United States and its allies in the event of an attack on Russia. Earlier, Putin held conferences on implementing the government's Ground Forces and Air Force programs. The session on the Strategic Nuclear Forces was highlighted on national TV, including Putin's statement that "nuclear arms ... remain a truly important guarantee of Russia's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and play a key role in supporting global and regional equilibrium and stability." Citing the need for the aerospace defense system to be "in a constant state of combat readiness, taking into account potential enemies' plans for developing offensive measures," Putin noted that "nearly all the nations that possess nuclear weapons and aerospace assault weapons are working to improve and develop them.
10 race, "but there should be no doubt as to the relia-

Russia, he said, has no plans to engage in an arms

The program calls for investing about 4.5 trillion rubles (nearly $150 billion) over the next several years, for the construction of 51 modern surface warships, 16 nuclear attack submarines, and 8 nuclear ballistic missile submarines by 2020 (2 of which are now undergoing trials). This will allow the share of modern vessels and equipment in the Navy to be brought to 70% by 2020, Putin said. "Resuming the serial construction of new-generation ships," he added, "should go hand-in-hand with modernizing shipbuilding enterprises and other defense industry companies." After these sessions devoted to each of the branches of the Russian Armed Forces, Putin on Aug. 31 held a pair of conferences on the strategic dimensions of economic policy. With Russian government and State Duma deliberations set to resume in September on the 2013 budget, under enormous monetarist pressures for budget-cutting because of the world economic crisis, Putin focused on the absolute priority of restoring Russia's military-industrial sector. Thus, these sessions on military-economic policy also served to underscore the tense international military-strategic situation. Addressing an expanded session of the Russian Security Council, Putin presented the military modernization plans as "ambitious," and cited the "record amounts of money" to be invested in defense procurement and modernization: 23 trillion rubles ($750 billion) over ten years. He acknowledged that "many of our companies are still in the past century, technologically speaking," and that in the course of more than three decades, the defense production plants "have missed out on several modernization cycles." Later in the day, Putin met with Deputy Prime Minister Rogozin and Roscosmos head Popovkin to discuss personnel changes to address the recent rocketlaunch failures. At the Security Council meeting, Putin also emphasized the idea, often stated by Rogozin, that the military-industrial sector should function as a locomotive to pull the whole economy alongor, at the very least, serve as a safe haven, where engineering and other skilled personnel might be preserved, even as domestic industry as a whole comes under new pressures such as competition from foreign imports, now that Russia has joined the WTO, and budget cuts in the so-called "state order" (government contracts). Regarding this potential interface between the defen-

se industry and the economy as a whole, the problem that bedeviled Soviet planners throughout the Cold War, Putin said: "Our position is that by creating a modernized and effective defense industry we can ensure a big growth potential for the entire national economy. The bulk of our advanced technology is in the defense industry, and civilian goods account for more than 30% of the sector's total output. There is steady demand for these goods in the energy, metals, machinebuilding, communications, and other industries. This is not some discovery we have made in this country, but is the way things work all around the world. The defense industry has always been an engine pulling the other manufacturing sectors along behind it. Of course, a stable and effective defense industry is also crucial for the prosperity and prospects in life for thousands of skilled workers, engineers, and designers. The defense industry brings together 1,353 organizations and companies in 64 regions of the country, and employs more than 2 million people. Just think how many that makes if you add their families and the people working in related sectors and so on." Summarizing, Putin made a startling comparison with the period of the Soviet Union's first Five-Year Plans: "In short, we will have to modernize the entire defense industry and the way it works, and carry out the same kind of comprehensive and powerful modernization drive that was achieved in the 1930s." The implications were not drawn out in this presentation, but such a "mobilization economy" is very different from the nostrums about privatization and "improving the investment climate," which are otherwise being repeated constantly by Russian officials, including Putin. Putin said Russia should not hesitate to imitate foreign defense technologies, but having only assembly plants using imported components would be a "dead end," so Russia "should develop complete production cycles, from development through to mass production and spare parts supply, here in Russia. This is the guarantee of our national, technological, and defense security."

Lord Conrad Black Declares:

By Matthew Ehret-Kump

With the recent announcement by UK and Canadian

foreign Ministers that many of the embassies of both countries shall be melded into single missions, Canadian based British agent and media mogul Conrad Black, unable to control his enthusiasm, has voiced a revealing op-ed in the right wing mouthpiece The National Post. The title of the op-ed reads: "The British Commonwealth Will Rise Again". After rewriting history by making FDR appear to be an imperialist, and asserting that China's new imperialism is meeting resistance with all of its neighbors, and predicting the breakup of Europe into two teams (winner and loser countries), Black writes: "There will be regional powers like Brazil and Turkey, but the only other coherent force that could arise and occupy a role somewhat analogous to a great power of old would be some cohesive bloc of Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, India, New Zealand, Singapore and perhaps a few other Commonwealth countries. The talented Australian foreign minister, Bob Carr, is capable of advancing along these lines, and Stephen Harper and John Baird would do well to explore these possibilities also". It is worthwhile to note that while born in Montreal, Conrad Black is not a Canadian citizen, but rather 100% British. Having received dual citizenship in Canada and UK in 2002 when the Queen of England granted him peerage in the British House of Lords as a reward for his outstanding services to the interests of the British Empire. Black was confronted with an ultimatum by then Prime Minster Jean Chretien who had intervened with a citation of a 1919 resolution barring Canadians from being members of the House of Lords. After a short legal battle which Black lost, Black renounced his Canadian citizenship becoming Lord Black of Crossharbour. Since his release from US Federal Prison in May 2012 after serving 36 months of a 48 month sentence for fraud and obstruction of justice, an unrepentant Black has found himself re-rising to prominence within the Canadian establishment quicker than one could say "Hail Britannia". Having been

The British Commonwealth Will Rise Again

granted an unprecedented Temporary Resident Permit from the Minister of Immigration, Jason Kenney, who is part of the Harper conservative apparatus installed largely through the direction of the Canadian Neo-con Sun Media that had been run by Black as part of his Hollinger media empire (1). Black has also been granted the use of all of his former Hollinger-Sun-Times media outlets to continue to mould public opinion among Canadas right wing in line with his masters interests.

The context of Blacks Fall from power

It appears that Conrad Blacks fall from power in 2006 occurred in the context of a faction fight had broken out within the Canadian establishment between the Liberal Party faction on the one side and Conservative Party faction on the other.

Lord Black cannot contain his exhuberance upon smelling the reemergence of the New British Empire.

(1) British Crown Assaults Canadian Wheat Board in Grab for World Grain Control www.larouchepub.com/eiw/ public/2007/eirv34n04-20070126/28-33_704_grain.pdf

Where the Liberal establishment was more interested in maintaining its local interests and local control outside of British foreign policy intentions, (witnessed by the Chretien Governments decision to not participate in the Iraq war of 2002 and Paul Martins 1998 successful blocking of the attempted mergers of four of Canadas five largest banks(1)), the Mulroney-Harper anglophile interests in the Conservative Party had been much more intent to do the obedient bidding of the City of London and British Foreign office. This faction fight led up to a collapse of the Liberal leadership of Paul Martin, and purging of relevant Liberal party controllers from power with the Sponsorship scandal of 2005-06. By 2012, the Federal presence of the Liberal Party has become almost non-existent, having been hammered by the 2011 elections that brought Harpers Conservatives their majority.

ish policy demanded of him in short order, rebranding the Canadian Military with the term royal, melding many Canadian and British Embassies around the world, converting Canada into an official fist of the Monarchy in the execution of wars with Libya, promoting wars with Iran and Syria, and falsely accusing Russia of trying to steal Canadas arctic sovereignty. Canadas role as a chess piece in this Great Game involves returning Canada to its roots as an aggressive weapon in the Empires arsenal, not seen since the days of the Boer Wars. This colonial function demands Canada act as a subversive agency to the intentions of nations aspiring sovereign development. The accomplishment of this task involves 1) serving as canon fodder for imperial wars abroad, and 2) trapping unwitting nations into reliance upon its abundant cheap resources via the logic of the fur trade aka free trade. The question now worth asking is: will China and India fall prey to the seductive fly trap of Canadas natural gas and resources in the context of Lord Blacks nightmarish vision? Or will they tighten their bonds of survival with Russia and help usher in a new age of development and peace? A third question arises: In the context of an alliance for progress and peace among nations, will Canada finally throw off the yoke of our imperial traditions and become a mature republic once and for all?

The Fall of the Liberals

The Liberal slaughter continues on the Provincial level, witnessed by the loss of one of its last beachheads with the Quebec election of September 2012 that brought Pauline Marois separatist Parti Quebecois (PQ) to power. The PQ is infamous for their intention to separate from Canada, their anti-nuclear stance, and Cap and Trade policy. Of the two remaining provincial Liberal power holds left, British Columbia has found Liberal support at an all time low due largely to the failed HST debacle in 2011. The Liberals under current BC premier Christie Clark are preparing to be swept away in favour of the National Democratic Party (NDP) during the upcoming elections in May 2013. The challenging NDP of British Columbia, just like the PQ of Quebec are in favour of those resource grabbing policies which are expedient to the British Empires geopolitical (1) On December 14, the free market logic of Paul fur interests (echoing 1998, then Finance Minster the Martin rejected the major bank green agenda of Bank of Canada trade), yet push the mergers of Royal renewable with the Bank of Montreal, and CIBC with Toronto Dominenergies (except nuclear), and cap and trade. It is ion, citing too note that NDP leadereconomic power in indicative to much concentration of Thomas MulCanada injust hands of too few financial institutions. the cair has the been made a Privy Councillor to MarQueen in September 18 2012, possibly in prepatins roleon Canadian policy, nor the Chretien government he then operated under should be regime in 2014. force for ration to replace the Harper assumed to be a
good. The sense of self-interest, and nationalist tendency During this past year Stephen Harperthan princiwithin the partys elders (while pragmatic more (Privy Councillor since 2005) has stepped up the anomalies pled) should not be missed when evaluating the use of the broad the changes in behaviour of Canadian policy. which mark power granted to him via his partys

majority government, to push through every Brit-


Embassies Unite:

The British Consolidate their Property

By Matthew Ehret-Kump

While Canadian foreign policy has always followed the British lead, there have been brief instances of resistance. The cases of the 1970s sanctioning of apartheid South Africa and Canadas non-participation in the precursor of the British Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Iraq War in 2002 spring immediately to mind. However, under Prime Minister Stephen Harper who took power in 2006 and now leads a majority government with those near unchallenged powers enjoyed with such majorities, the unquestioned obedience to British endgame geopolitics has never been so strong. Though Canadas cooperation in the defence and cultivation of the Heroin production of Afghanistans Helmand province had already been underway from the beginning of the Afghan war, this overt military policy became significantly more aggressive with the Arab Spring in 2011. It was at this time that Canada committed its military to provide 10% of the air support and logistics during the UK-France-USA led Regime Change program that illegally killed Muamar Qadaffi under the umbrella of NATO. In hindsight, it was discovered that the greatest atrocities of this war were not to have been committed by the disposed head of state, but rather, by those moralizing forces who conducted the humanitarian intervention, armed radical Islamists and killed 70 000 innocent Libyan civilians. The official legal precedent for this war was the anti-nation state doctrine of R2P. This program was continued with expelling Syrian diplomats and shutting down the Syrian embassy in March 2012, merely weeks after the Annan Peace Plan was begun (and later sabotaged), to the effect that all illusions of Canadian peacemaking and diplomacy was exposed to be an illusion. Before Canada, the only nation to shut down Syrian diplomatic missions was the UK. This aggressive policy was repeated with Canadas shutdown of the Iranian embassy in early September 2012 modelled again after the British precedent. Since Canadas actions so obediently followed British geopolitical doctrine from 2006-2012, an

overt branding as British property has been called for.

The Re-Branding of Canada

In April 2011, the British makeover officially began with the re-naming of the Canadian military. This policy saw Harper pass a law which reinserted the Royal into all branches of the Canadian Military. Controversy briefly erupted as Constitutional Lawyers and Defence Specialists pointed out that Section 15 of the British North American Act of 1867 sites that the command of the Canadian military is not vested in Parliament, but rather in the Crown. This mandate was reaffirmed with Section 14 of the National Defence Act of 1985 with the words: The Canadian

Forces are the armed forces of Her Majesty

raised by Canada and consist of one Service called the Canadian Armed Forces. University of Ottawa De-

fence specialist Philippe Lagasse argued during this time that while the military is answerable to the Parliament, it is accountable and obedient only to ministers of the Crown. Any lingering denial of this control of the Canadian Military by Ministers of the crown was highly shaken.

Up until recently, Harpers rabid anglophilia was considered little more than a bizarre fetish for onlookers, but has now blossomed into a global security threat.


This was followed immediately by Harpers renaming the main wall in the Canadian Foreign Office Head Quarters the Sovereign Wall, deriving its name from the gigantic mural sized portrait of Queen Elisabeth. Not only was this unsightly portrait forced into public display in one Ottawa building, but an accompanying order was passed forcing portraits of the Queen to be mounted upon the walls of every Canadian embassy in the world. While many onlookers watched in bewilderment, the fanatic anglophile could still be heard shouting but the Monarchy is only a symbol! The British Empire carries no real power!

Stephen Harper and Thomas Mulcair: Agents of the British Empire.

For those who still believe that the Privy Council of Canada is merely a relic of old traditions long dead exercising no more control than the Queen, it would do well to re-consider that view as it is not the people, or parliament who hold the allegiance of those who are introduced into its roster, but rather the Queen of England. I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty's Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faithfully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty. That both Stephen Harper, as well as NDP leader Thomas Mulcair have taken this oath of allegiance and secrecy should send alarm bells in the minds of any thinking citizen. This also means that these illustrious men have joined the ranks with such national disasters and foreign agents of influence as Maurice Strong, Paul Desmarais of Powercorp, Lord Conrad Black, Prince Phillip of Edinburg, and the current head of the powerful Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) John Manley. Being a member of this select group does not immediately prove an individual is engaged in treason anymore than someones participation in a Bilderberger meeting or freemasonic society. It does however speak volumes if the person in question is actively carrying out the intentions of a financial oligarchy which has explicitly stated their intention to reduce the world population from the current 7 billion to less than one (see Environmentalism and the General Welfare Make Poor Bedfellows on page 21).

Embassies Unite
As of September 23 2012, many Canadian embassies the world over will no longer simply have Canadian flags hanging from their flag poles, but rather the Canadian ambassadors and their respective staff within and the Canadian Maple leaf flag without will now be joined with British ambassadors and the Union Jack. Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the UK and Canada (John Baird and William Hague) have officially announced the melding of the embassies of both nations! Ostensibly, this measure is being undertaken to save money, but the true motive for such overt consolidation of the British Empires possessions can only be addressed if one let go of all popular illusions regarding the true workings of the shadow empire maintained by the London Centered oligarchy. This process is made the more dangerous as the Baird and Hague Empire is not unawareness of the demise of its announce joint emown monetary system.
bassies in Ottawa.

During the context of the collapse of the British run world monetary system, these policies are intended to do nothing less then set fire to the entire African and Middle Eastern worlds, by fuelling what Samuel P Huntington dubbed the Clash of Civilizations doctrine, to the point of risking thermonuclear warfare with Russia and China.


The New Canada Imperial Arctic Makeover:

Will Increased Canadian Arctic Territory be used to Provoke War with Russia?
By Matthew Ehret-Kump

In 2007, headlines across Canada echoed the spirit of the Cold war, as Canadian Defense Minister Peter Mackay screamed that Canadas arctic sovereignty was threatened and that a greedy resource grab of valuable Canadian territory had occurred. Stephen Harper immediately announced plans to purchase three arctic patrol ships, (later confirming three unmanned drones) to defend Canadas true north strong and free. The Russian aggressors had to be put in their place. What had provoked this unbalanced response from a Canada that had demonstrated no active interest in the Arctic or its development for decades? As it turned out, a Russian submarine had placed a Russian flag near the North Pole along a disputed territory known as the Lomonosov Ridge. As facts would later reveal, the Russian submarine was on nothing more than a scientific study. While large components of the abrupt militarization of the Arctic announced by Harper in 2007, were put on hold due to the economic crisis that spiked in 2009, it had not at all disappeared, as we now find the seeds of this orchestrated tension springing up yet again. This is evidenced by the October 5th announcement of the Canadian Geological Survey and Natural Resources Canada that 1.75 million square kilometres of seabed in the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans are definitively the sole property of Canada. These claims are the substance of a multithousand page submission of 25 studies submitted in October to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which had adopted a new formula for determining national coastal boundaries in 2003. Nations had been given 10 years to conduct studies and submit claims for expanded territory beyond the current 12 nautical miles (22.2 km) off coastal land. If these claims are approved, then Canadas current area of 9.9 million square kilometres will increase by 20% (or the size of Quebec). Two of the most important territorial claims involve the Alpha Ridge mountain extending past the North Pole, and the other is the Lo-

monosov Ridge.

The Seeds of World War Begin to Grow

Today, as tense hotspots have been built up in Syria and Iran, which could easily unfold into a nuclear showdown between Russia and China pitted against NATO countries, a less understood component to the orchestration of general war exists in the domain of territorial conflicts around the Pacific, Arctic and Atlantic Oceans. This strategy cannot be understood unless the reader comprehend that the only opposition to a new British Empire (one world government) is to be found in the coalition of Russia, China and Argentina.


These three nations have made their full national policy commitments center on the right to national sovereignty, international cooperation, technological progress, and have committed to effective war avoidance measures ever since the assassination of Libyas President Gaddafi. Nations of the nonaligned movement representing over two thirds of the world population have rallied strongly around these three pillars. In the Pacific Ocean, Japans brash nationalization of the five uninhabited islets (known by Japan as Senkaku and by China as Diaoyu) has resulted in an international crisis pitting China against Japan. China faces the danger of another territorial conflict sparked by the the President of the Philippines who decided late in 2011 that the South China Sea should be re-named the East Philippines Sea. What most media reports leave out when discussing these hot spots, is that both the Philippine President Benigno Aquino III, as well as the Japan President Noda, have both agreed recently to host U.S. military bases as part of the new Air-Sea battle plan designed around the containment of China and documented in LaRouchePACs recent feature film Unsurvivable (1). This military strategy has seen two U.S Ohio class submarines deployed to the Pacific theatre, each packing Trident nuclear warheads. Other more official British colonies such as Australia are being used to contain China within the new Air-Sea Battle Plan, as Australian PM Julia Gillard has agreed to host two US military bases on its territory which Chinese military officials have identified as representing direct strategic threats. Due to the new UNCLOS measures, Australia has recently expanded its undersea territory by 2.5 million square kilometres (or 1/3 its total land area) in 2008. As small minded (often unwitting) pawns of the British Empire do the Matriarchs dirty work on the Pacific theatre, the British military has sprung into aggressive direct action in the Atlantic as a response to Argentinas recent re-affirmation that the Malvinas Islands are (and have always been) a part of Argentina. Indeed, the Islands were in fact stolen by the British Empire during the early 1833 war with Argentina, and have been maintained as a British colony ever since. The British response (1) www.larouchepac.com/unsurvivable to Argentinas claim has been to 1) reject all Ar-

gentine offers of dialogue and 2) deploy a Destroyer battleship and a one of its four HMS Vanguard nuclear armed submarines to the coast of the Malvinas (which they continue to call the Falklands). The irony in this instance is that Britains basis for its military deployment is centered on its accusation that Argentina is acting like a colonialist. This absurd accusation persists, despite Argentine President Christina Kirchners insistence of the fact that Britains continued claim of the Falklands remains illegitimate according to the UN Special Committee on Decolonization.

The Consequences of Ignoring Reality

One year after Russia was scorned by Peter Mackay and Harper for trying to steal Canadas arctic sovereignty, Russia had found itself the subject of an attack by Soros Georgian puppet president Mikheil Saakashvili in 2008. Saakashvilis attack on Russias protectorate in South Ossetia resulted in a brief war that ended five days after having begun. Saakashvili attempted to illegally claim South Ossetia as Georgian territory. At that time, Georgia was not a part of NATO, and had it been, all relevant NATO members would have been Russian tanks in Georgia durdrawn into that conflict in Georgias defence. Toing the five day war in 2008. day, Saakashvili has been replaced by yet another billionaire puppet that has made Georgias admission to NATO a primary objective. With literally dozens of explosive powder kegs placed all around the world which couldnt exist as detonators for war were it not for the belief in resource scarcity and monetary rules to which our behaviour and thoughts must conform, the world is sitting on the edge of a self-imposed extinction.


Mackinders Geopolitics versus LaRouches World Landbridge

By Jonathon Ludwig American economist Lyndon LaRouches proposals for a Eurasian Landbridge and Russias current proposal for the Bering Strait Rail Tunnel connection from Vladivostok through 100 km of water to Alaska and into Canada are not new. These visionary proposals are a long time in the making and have represented a tormenting nightmare to several generations of imperial geopoliticians. By the turn of the 20th century, Russian Transport Minister Count Sergei Witte working in tandem with American system leaders and engineers in Siberia were completing the final stretch of the Trans-Siberian Railway. This development followed 1) hot on the heels of Lincolns victorious suppression, with the help of Russias Czar Alexander II, of the British financed Confederate uprising in 1865, 2) the 1867 United States purchase of Alaska from Russia, and 3) the near annexation of British Columbia into America in 1870 (1). The feasibility studies to connect the two continents were first presented by the Trans-Siberian Railway Company in 1905 (2). The British Empire at the time was known as the old man of Europe and in Wereintents and purposes bribe BC merchants during a all it not for Britains offer to was on the verge of (1) extinction. of 1867-1870, all onlookers from Canada and the heated period
USA alike believed that this British colony was nearly about to incorporate into America, as this provided the only economically viable options available for the bankrupt colony. a closed Mackinders geopolitics demandsThe Transcontinental railway had just been built into San Francisco and an system active ferry system connected the BC merchants to the USA. The British had to move fast and did so by 1) paying off British CoIn 1904, as a response2) then purchasing the massive territo these developments, Britlumbias massive debt, and ish separatingSociety member and director known as Fabian its eastern and western colonies also of the tory LondonLand and of Economics Sir HalfordCompany in Ruperts School owned by the Hudsons Bay Mackin1868 and 3) finally promising to build thought connectingas der, formulated a school of a railway known BC to Eastern Canada which was accomplished in all imperial Geopolitics. This study has influenced 1885. The only condition was whoBritish Columbia join the Confederation and strategists that emerged from the 20th century not choose the American option.

Mackinders program was little more than a reformulated divide to conquer policy already practiced for centuries by the British Empire, and arose entirely as a response which the threat Lincolns American System program of rail development posed to the continued existence of the failing British Empire as mentioned above.

Sir Halford Mackinder summarized his theory: Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World."

from Rhodes scholar William Yandell Elliot, his Harvard totalling six million dollars were raised privately, (2) Funds students sir Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bernard Lewis as well million. An editoconcluding the project could be done for $300as Samuel P. rial in the New to name a of October 24th, 1905, observed that Huntington York Times few. It was also the foundathe Bering Strait Tunnel istheory extolled by Nazi geotion for the Heartland a project which at some time in the future is likely to command a great deal of very purposeful politician Karl Haushofer and adopted by Hitler.


Not only did rail pose a threat to the Empire, but the advent of the new energy dense fuel source known as petroleum which was threatening to replace the largely monopolized (and less energy dense) coal for industrial production. From Japans Meiji Restoration, to Chancellor von Bismarcks Berlin to Baghdad Rail initiative, to Russias Trans-Siberian Railway, intercontinental development driven by American System rail programs were initiating new dynamics of cooperation and development amongst all nations of North America, Europe, Russia and Asia. Most importantly, these pro-development approaches to national economies were founded on the concerted rejection of all British Free Trade dogma and the vigorous adoption of the protective tariff, productive credit and long term planning, all acting under the principle of the general welfare. To their horror, the British Empire was witnessing a worldwide emergence of the American System. After successful expeditions to the South and North Pole had been accomplished by 1909, Mackinder declared, like Malthus before him that all admirer von Bismarck Lincoln that could be discovered on the Earth had been was discovered, and that world society was now offiamong the many human ciallyimporting the Ameristatesmen locked within an absolutely closed system. All that remained of for can System by the endwas the leading monopolies to 19th map out finite resources, and get victim nations to century. His ouster would lead slaughter each other in territorial disputes that to the unleashing of World Warswould 2. See the film 1932 as the outcome of each 1 and necessarily occur striving to for the full story. possess as many of these finite resources as possible before they ran out. This would be achieved by getting nations to look at the future not from the American System standpoint of their creative potentials to change those limits for the better, but rather from the monetarist free market filter of pleasure-pain and momentary profit. Were bestial dynamic of each against all not adopted, all hope for world domination would be lost. Mackinders theory was expressed most clearly in his observation: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World."

ing each other in a closed system of absolute scarcity. Rather than creatively moving outside of those limits by discovering new principles of the universe, and creating new energy sources such as nuclear fission, thermonuclear fusion power, or desalinating ocean water to green deserts, nations have been told, rather arbitrarily, that scarcity has to be respected and, like beasts, adapted to in a survival of the fittest paradigm.

For a full documentation of the American System and the British Empires orchestration of World War one, then check out:

Reality is an Open System

In the logic of empire, nations must be kept fight19

This logic has been used to manipulate idiots with political power into initiating almost every single un-necessary war during this past century, and governs the geopolitical thinking that is resulting in potential territorial conflict the world over today. According the BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2011, this past year has witnessed the greatest drop of nuclear energy use on record (with a 4.3% fall) while coal has become the worlds fastest growing fuel (totalling 30.3% of global use). While green energies such as wind and solar power have risen by 25.8% and 86.6% respectively, their combined total contribution to global energy consumption is a measly 2.1%.

tion of humanity.

The energy required to produce renewable energies far outweigh their output while the wasted land area required to sustain them is not only bad economics, but it is more importantly, the sickly effects of a community of nations turning their LaRouches World of progress and already becoming a reality in Eastern Russia and Asia. Will backs on 600 years Landbridge is embracing an the rest of the world wakeno more than one bil-board? ideology which will permit up in time to get on lion humans living in political, mental and physical conditions not terribly different from feudalism. Today, new energy sources await the political will to overcome those boundary limits met by our current addiction to fossil fuels and inefficient green renewables. On top of the prospect of connecting Eurasian countries in a New Silk Road known as the World Landbridge and Bering Strail Tunnel, the new frontier defining Mackinders fraud is located in the prospect of unbounded space exploration, lunar and Mars industrialization and asteroid defence. None of these are utopian fantasies, but rather active policies either already being applied by leading nations such as China and Russia, or being offered by leaders among those nations such as Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozins offer for Strategic Defense of Earth (SDE), and Russian Transport Minister Yakunins Bering Strait proposal. The effect of continuing to tolerate the limits we find imposed upon ourselves as a species, will entail not only undoing the industrial revolution, but also ushering in new wars with the use of thermonuclear weapons, risking the extermina-


By Matthew Ehret-Kump

When the consequences of a gambling addiction catch up to the addict, were his immediate response not to seek help, but to sell his children, the future for that family would become bleak indeed. This response is pitifully tragic when committed by any individual, but criminally insane when committed by the leadership of national governments entrusted by the people with the care of the common good. Although criminally insane, it is specifically this mindset which is the driving force behind Fed Chairman Ben Bernankes recent unleashing of another (QE3) bailout, Obamas calls for gutting Social Security and Medicare in order to raise the debt ceiling, and the similar behavior of bailouts and fascist cuts being demanded by the IMF and ECB in Europe. In the midst of this torrent of insanity, the voice of the people is increasingly calling for the abolishment the speculative monopoly money and returning to national banking programs under a global Glass-Steagall reform (1).

Environmentalism and the General Welfare Make Poor Bedfellows

The Green-Blue Paradox

behaviour and values into conformity with an oligarchical model that is the underlying cause of Germanys suicidal decision to exit from Nuclear by 2020, Harpers selloff of AECL and Obamas abolishment of the manned space program. The causal intention is nothing less than those genocidal effects which will result due to such policies.

To exacerbate this crisis even more, we find that a global policy is being implemented on the behalf of the British empires Inter Alpha group (2) through their control of the Green movement to crush those last remnants of frontier science which humanity still has at its disposal, and which, under a new system could be mobilized to build our way out of this multi-generational crisis. It has long been understood by the empire and its opponents, that it is functionally in the domain of science and technology that mankinds true role as a unique species of unbounded potential expresses itself, and in that fact, so too melts away any sophistical justification for the existence of the parasitical system of oligarchy, which rather seeks to keep humanity enslaved as cattle in fixed systems of zero growth. This anti-science (and antihuman) intention expressed by controllers of the Green movement such as Prince Phillip, involve (1) For an overview of the full separation of speculative from bringing humankinds population to levels productive banking activities visit our Glass-Steagall website acceptable to a governing elite according to at www.larouchepac.com/glass-steagall mathematical models known as carrying capacity. the Lpac video: The Inter Alpha Group (2) See

This context must be kept in mind when considering the new phenomenon sweeping the Canadian political landscape between two irreconcilable movements. That is, the marriage of labour and environmentalism which is manifesting itself most clearly within the National Democratic Party (NDP) and Quebecs Parti Quebecois (PQ) as of this writing. The argument for a green-blue marriage is based not on science but rather on the fallacious assumption that manmade activities and CO2 emissions are the primary drivers for Global Warming and must be halted at all cost. The only solution to this non-existent problem proposed by those powers attempting to orchestrate the marriage involve the drastic elimination of those means of sustaining advanced civilization via:

As Plato once warned, it is the desire for one`s (3) In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return shackles that maintains a slave more effectively as a deadly virus, in order to contribute somethingit has also than forcing shackles upon him. Hence, to solve overpopulation.- Prince Philipe, co-founder of World Wildlife beenfor Nature, quoted in intention to Agentur societys that long term Deutsche Press bring (DPA), Fund
August, 1988


1) Reduction of high energy density technologies such as nuclear power 2) The elimination of CO2 emissions via new speculative cap and trade programs and 3) The advancement of low energy dense power systems such as wind, solar, geothermal and tidal power which lack the power density to sustain the industrial needs of a technologically advanced, population dense mode of society. All three factors are designed to have one common objective: The reduction of the world population from the current 7 billion to less than 1 billion. This policy was outlined in blood curdling detail in the recent report by the Scientific Advisory Council of the Federal Government of Germany on Global Environmental Changes (WBGU)(4)whose director Hans Joachim Schellnhuber was recently quoted as saying: ``In a cynical way, it's a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something-namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people. What a triumph. On the other hand, do we want this alternative? I think we can do much, much better.'' It is no wonder that Schellnhuber was awared Commander of the British Empire by Queen Elisabeth in 2004. To any humanist, the contradiction in the attempted marriage of labour movements which support the general welfare and anti humanist environmentalism is blatant. The awareness of this contradiction was made evident in the heated fight during the 2011 Vancouver NDP convention, between the true labour and green factions, who fiercely battled over the attempted greening of the Party constitution, replacing principles of social justice to conservation. While that amalgamation of greenblue was successfully resisted then, a new wave has begun, with the same desired effect. The arguments which attempt to justify the unnatural alliance are not merely fallacies, but actually reflect a moral disease festering in the minds of the Canadian people which must be overcome quickly. The reality is that the entire world system is in the last throws of a general collapse whose causes are largely to be found in the unwillingness (4) World in Transition : A Social Contract forthe Interof the political leadership to confront Sustainability. Read the whole misanthropic report on Alpha Group`s immense stranglehold over our nawww.wbgu.de tional economies.

As Lyndon Larouche has been saying for decades; nothing within the monetarist logic will solve this type of physical crisis. Nothing short of a fundamental abolishment of the artificial rules of monetarism in favour of a return to clean Hamiltonian banking practices on a global level will open any pathway to a future worth living in. That means that no opinions justifying budget cuts, hyperinflationary bailout, or green population reduction as solutions to this crisis shall be respected as legitimate.

A Lesson from Physical Economics

In the science of physical economics, we learn that it is mankinds increasing power within and over the universe which is the invariant metric of value. Not money. Interestingly, it is not only a characteristic of human life which expresses this potential of creative anti-entropy, but contrary to the popular delusion now taught in schools, the universe as a whole exhibits this same power of constant self development. Moving from energy sources of lower flux density to higher flux density as we see with the leaps of wood to coal, coal to uranium, and beyond in human society represents the same function expressed in lower orders of life developing new technologies such as chlorophyll, and permitting for greater metabolic activity of life on earth (see figure1 on next page). This increase of powers of energy to accomplish increased work is known as energy flux density in physical economics. The truth of this power unique to the human condition is one which necessitates our total abolishment of all forms of energy policy which have the effect of: 1) Reducing our power to act on the universe through forcing a decrease of energy flux density 2) Reducing human population growth 3) Reducing our intensive expansion of global investments into all anti-inflationary (and antientropic) activities of the type outlined on the www.larouchepac.com/infrastructure page.


Figure 1

In fact, the only power source with the energy flux density adequate to support the perpetual growth of these three factors at once, is to be found in domain of third and fourth generation nuclear energy, thermonuclear fusion, and eventual Matter-Antimatter processes. Each increase of power upward must be subsumed within a higher Moon to Mars (and beyond) colonization outlook. Windmills, and solar panels offer only self destruction (5).

powers of our species to express themselves, and with them, the necessary a moral precondition for self-governance. If we succumb through ignorance, or inaction, to the monetarist and environmentalist propaganda by rejecting those frontiers of nuclear energy and space exploration, it is not merely the financial oligarchy, but ourselves that will be judged guilty for the genocide that will be unleashed.

It is this optimistic outlook and the associated means of actualizing its aims, that not only built the best aspects of our civilization (which are now suffering from neglect, privatization, and cuts), but which will again be the efficient Power behind our still possible survival. The participation of a reformed Canada in an alliance of sovereign nation states is notthe passage it for only a characteristic of human life which expresses this potential of creative antiof a Global Glass-Steagall, followed by a return to as a whole exhibits this same power of constant self development. entropy, the universe fixed exchange rates as described under the nested conic functions demonstrate the increasing rates of energy flux density Here , LaRouches New Bretton Woods remains a possible third option biotic and noetic (aka: cognitive) aspects of our universe. increases in the abiotic, beyond that of chaos, and despotism now being offered to the credulous.

Market forces be damned, humanity comes first.

The means thus established for a Hamiltonian credit system usher in the next question: How can labour return to its roots as an uncompromising defender of social justice, and scientific and technological progress which have defined our nations best character for generations? How can Canadian labour help kick start the re-industrialization of ourselves and our neighbours abroad, using the most advanced science and technology for the common interests of all? This bold change in paradigm could not be done for monetary profit, nor to appease market forces, and not possibly to make jobs. This change could only occur with the understanding that it is the creative powers of human cognition which permit for the increase of humanity`s power over the universe and is expressed formally as a measure of our potential relative population density. Today, no source of energy existent aside from Nuclear fission and thermonuclear Fusion will ever permit for the equitable increase of those material standards of life to levels high enough to supply the dig(5) and freedom Energy: www.larouchepac.com/ nity The Fraud of Freeso necessary for those creative

For a full dossier of video material and extensive exposes of the fascist roots of the Green movement, visit the following website: www.larouchepac.com/greenfascism


By Pascal Chevrier

The use of nuclear power is neither a political nor an ideological issue; it is the most powerful scientific-economic breakthrough that happened during the 20th Century. The scientific and physical economic aspects of nuclear power have not been acknowledged by any of Qubecs political leadership; the political parties have shown no understanding of these attributes, what so ever. Our concern is that they are not alone; this is why we submit the present article to the scrutiny of all our fellow citizens.

an energy source Is Qubec committingwith reports on of that type? Then paranoia sets in scientific suicide? radiations and possible catastro-

Or why buying gold wont change a thing

phes that could happen in the future, the wastes disposal, contamination, stillbirths, etc Once upon a time, Qubec could have been a leader in nuclear technology -Hydro-Qubecs plan was, in the 1970s, to build around 30 nuclear reactors along the St Lawrence River- an opportunity missed when the PQ government of the time voted to halt indefinitely any building of new nuclear plants. To keep popular hysteria about danger of the nuclear technology dams were built in James Bay and Manicouagan region, and Quebec became a world leader in hydro-powered systems. But the nuclear technology is not only about providing electricity. It has many other purposes. Carbon-14 is used to date archaeological findings; medical isotopes are used for either imaging and/ or therapy. Shortages that occurred when the world found out it our Chalk River reactor produces more then 50% of its needs.

As humanity is confronted with the biggest financial-economic crisis it ever lived through and a set -up for potential world war in the Middle-East cockpit, we, citizens, must choose to either sink with it into a new global dark age or affect an evolutionary change that is lawfully crafted on the anti-entropic behaviour of our universe. The latter would assure our common survival, but meanwhile, contradictory decisions are being made by our political leaders Shutting down G-2 The recent statement by Parti Qubcois (PQ) leaders to the effect of closing the Gentilly-2 nuclear reactor comes as no real surprise as it was already a known intention of the party, specified in their latest electoral platform. The declaration was made two weeks after the elections of a PQminority government, without reasons to explain it other than the green ideological fad of so-called renewable energies and some tax money-saving rhetoric. In fact, the majority (3 out of 5) of Quebecs political parties running for the last provincial elections had already written nuclear energy out of Quebecs future. The Liberals and CAQ were advocating it for wrong small-minded reasons. Obviously, distrust and anger has been growing especially from the families of the 800 specialized employees that will be losing their job due to the shutting down of the power plant. Helping in alerting public opinion has to why we had to shut down Gentilly-2 was a showing of a documentary on Quebec public channel titled Gentilly or not to be in the wake of the announcement. Nothing grandiose has to be said about the documentary, showing nuclear bomb explosions from the start, the intent is clear: who could trust


The Empire: making a bloodless killing Since the end of World War II, institutions have been created by those formerly associated with the eugenics societys leadership, most of them crown -bearing. They decided that their Empire would prevail through new ways of making population reduction acceptable to their dumb subjects. They chose wildlife conservation, or if you prefer, environmentalism. Making mankind the environments top enemy, this is now becoming a new sinister dont feed the poor Malthusian doctrine of save the environment mantra! The Club of Rome and other think tanks have published books like The Population Bomb and Limits to Growth to warn of impending doom if the worlds population was not culled rapidly. Today, in 2012, Prince Philip, the Queens consort, and his financiers acolytes still promote a maximum Earth carrying capacity of less then 2 billion people. All to the environments profit, of course... The most important tool this oligarchy has, is our uneducated fear which can deny the necessary technologies for third world countries to develop and now to ourselves since the Western world has lost the idea of producing for the future since the post-industrial shift that followed the counterculture revolt of 1968. The insane fear of radiation Edward Teller used to joke that a man would get more radiation from sleeping with two women than living next to a nuclear plant. Though you may or may not find the image offensive, it is still nonetheless true. Radioactivity is everywhere in our universe. It is in the food we eat, in the soil we step on, it is emitted from the Sun that shines upon us and even originates from the cells in our own body! The doses of radiations we receive from artificial sources -like for nuclear plants- are infinitesimal. For example: Every year, Canadians are exposed on average to about 1.8 millisieverts (mSv) from natural background radiation. This means that in one year, residents living in TroisRivires and Bcancour get 900 times more radiation from natural background than from the manmade radiation from Gentilly-2. Some might ask the question What is the dose of radiation thats normal for a human being? There are no satisfying answers anyone can give except between a certain minimum and maximum bracket. (perhaps

include a word about the fraud of Low dose radiation in 1-2 sentences). Dont buy gold Increase energy-flux density! What gives value to anything may it be gold, wood or, even uranium? Think of our old relative, the caveman, what did he value? Whats useful to his survival? Some tools, yes, but what is the principle tool-making? What is behind the bronze and iron ages, what made them possible? It is important to get it right, since these new tools were more valuable to him and to human civilization. What is the underlying principle that carried out these discoveries? Creativity is our human gift, and the concepts applied and enhanced every time a fundamental discovery is made is what we call the concept of energy flux density, or otherwise the principle of fire developed at length by Lyndon LaRouche in many of his economic papers. Energy flux density is the standard by which energy production must be studied and chosen. Physical economics, the modern science founded by Gottfried Leibniz, was developed around the concept of steam-powered machines applied to alleviate and enhance the work of mankind. The per capita per square kilometre output of energy is the valid measure to understand which energy production will be able to power cities of 200 or 200,000 citizens. The readers should look at a very good study on the subject for more extended data. The before mentioned criteria is the one making nuclear-fission power an unbeatable option in todays standards, orders of magnitude higher in output then wind, solar and fossil fuels-powered plants. Modern society necessitates a shift towards an atom renaissance. But nuclear power is not only for producing electricity. Hospitals use nuclear isotopes for detection and treatment of cancers.


The reasons to develop nuclear are multiple. It is not because it doesnt produce greenhouse gases. The greens will always try to find ways to use the periodic table to destroy humanitys progress (clarify this statement as its really not clear). Nuclear power is not just about electricity production, it is also about medical isotopes, creation of new material One pellet of uranium in a fission process produces the amount of energy 807 kg of coal or 607 litres of oil, or 476 cubic meters of natural gas wind and solar energy are not calculable. Quebec is powered by hydro : 94,8 %, fossil fuel : 2,6 %, nuclear : 2,1 %, wind : 0,3 %, biomass/wastes : 0,2 %. That is to say, that 1 nuclear power plant (Gentilly-2) generates almost ten times more power then 393 windmills! How much land is wasted on a technology that will only fuel a new dark age?

Speeding up the Renaissance

As we discuss the shutting down of Gentilly-2, Japan is not only reopening closed nuclear plants, but also launching the building of new ones. The nuclear renaissance is also on its way in Russia, China and India as their governments have declared war on the short-term thinking so deadly popular on our side of the Pacific. The use of new technology on Thorium-based fission reactors, fourth generation fission reactors and advances on nuclear fusion are the intentions of those nations to assure stable sources of energy production for the coming centuries. Every society, to prosper, need to increase its energy input/output to function properly that is not an ideological statement its simply the science of development as seen in our human history. We, in the West, have to decide to partake into this Renaissance and help it ignite itself faster, already some promising project are underway like Belgiums Myrrha, which could eliminate the term nuclear waste by transmuting the radioactive elements into new non radioactive material (perhaps bring up the CANDU, and what Canadian knowhow can contribute for the world and ourselves?). Any questions? Lets do it !


pass, a Britains Attack other state companies The Paradoxical Case offlurry ofAsia and theowned energy promise to primarily from Middle East Many onlookers who understand that the core of the follow with similar purchases with Korea, Kuwait, India on its own Green Movement in Canada British Empires program for depopulation and the sub- and Malaysia already topping the list. According to BPs

By Jonathon Ludwig

version of the nation state leans upon its control of the environmentalist movement, have found it somewhat paradoxical that British puppet Stephen Harper of Canada has made headlines this summer by passing sweeping reforms under the C-38 omnibus bill, which has overturned decades of environmentalist legislation designed to stop development in the name of wildlife conservation. This reform has thus opened up new corridors for streamlined resource extraction across the board. British sponsored environmental groups have been abandoned, and have been screaming all across Canada, but with very little resistance from the opposition NDP party which has up until now represented the voice of Green in Canada. In fact, in the weeks before and after being sworn in to the Queens Privy Council on September 18 2012, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair has uncharacteristically come out defending both the Alberta oil sands, as well as the new Ensbridge pipeline to the pacific.

Statistical Review of World Energy Report of June 2012, of all remaining private global (not state controlled) oil reserves, 62% are found in Canadas oil sands. 10.6% of overall world oil reserves are in Canada. It is appropriate to here point out, that were it not for the demand from Asias markets, the Plan of the North set in motion by the now fallen Quebec Liberal Party of Jean Charest never would have begun. Quebec is now engaged in applying the Alberta oil sand model of resource extraction under the $80 billion PPP investment into opening up Quebecs resource rich north. Just like the Alberta oil sand model, the Quebec model entails zero nation building, but is based entirely upon the logic of converting minerals into money as fast as possible within the closed-system logic of market theory. Were the Three Power Alliance of Russia, China, and the USA adopted in the short term however, coinciding with a Global Glass-Steagall re-organization of the financial system, would not only stimmy the threat of World War, but usher in a nuclear renaissance as well. If Canadas thorium rich soils were tapped and an advanced liquid salt nuclear crash program following Chinas lead were adopted, Geopolitical manipulation around humanitys reliance on finite fossil fuels would no longer be used to the advantage of the British Empire as it is now, but rather an unbounded potential for growth would be realized and the creation of new resources in the benefit of all would be the result.

Why the anomalies?

Conservative Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver, speaking to a group of Asian businessmen has promised that Canada hopes to build infrastructure to liquefy and export nine billion cubic feet per day of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to Asia through five proposed coastal plans. With the member of new pipelines from Alberta Privy Council building and BC to the Pacific starting with Ensbridge, and Thomas Mulcair has Chinas existential need for fossil fuels for its survival, begun his unlikely dethe risk of China falling prey to the addiction of Canfense of the oil sands and very real. The British of course, adas cheap resources is Ensbridge on loosening the bonds of survival which have are intent pipeline. thus far held Russia and China together against the British drive for World War and are deploying every asset available to do so. This fact is especially pertinent as the schism deepens between China and Australia due to Australias hosting two U.S. Military bases antagonistic to China. As China currently imports a vast portion of its natural gas needs from Australia, we must ask: Is Canada being set up to replace Australias role as supplier of Chinas natural gas needs? Surely, the Chinese ambassador to Australias new job as ambassador to Canada provides one clue. The additional hype surrounding Canadas comparative advantage relative to Australias in exporting natural gas published in the KPMG 2012 Competitive Alternatives report is another. The proposal by state owned China National Offshore Oil Co (CNOOC) to purchase Canadas Nexen gas company for $15.1 billion should be viewed within this greater context. If this deal, now held up in court due to the fact that CNOOC is a state owned company, should


terrupt, thanks to a passive security and Is China on the road to becoming the couldsystem turn operating at ambient pressure, it world never While recent Announcements by French Ministers into a new Chernobyl. Better yet, with the MSFR, leader in the nuclear energy of the future? Arnaud Montebourg and Delphine Batho loudly half lives of waste in lesser are scaled down to 300 By Karel Vereyken, Nouvelle Solidarit, France proclaimed that nuclear power will remain a sector with a future, President Francois Hollande just confirmed that in the name of ecological and energetic transition, France would be closing the Fessenheim nuclear power plant. He also repeated his commitment to cutting French generated nuclear energy from 75 to 50%, following Germanys lead to exit the field by 2020. Having produced the likes of Marie Curie, Paul Langevin, Pierre Mends-France and Charles De Gaulle, France has always played a pioneering role in this domain. It is therefore ever more tragic that this great world leader in nuclear science has fallen to such a low that its politicians are trying to sell the idea that France could become a world nuclear leader in plant dismantling! In parallel with the ASTRID demonstrator (Advanced Sodium Technological Reactor for Industrial Demonstration) steered by the Commissary for Atomic Energy (CAE) of France, a team from the National Center for Scientific Research in Grenoble (NCSR) have reworked the concept of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) associated with thorium, one of six research options retained in the context of the Generation IV forum. Thorium 232, a metal three times more abundant in nature than uranium, when exposed to a source of neutrons, for example in the core of a European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), can be fertilized. It is then transformed into uranium 233 and will become in turn, a fissile fuel. While India intends on using it as a solid fuel, MSFRs are based on the use of a molten salt (lithium or beryllium fluorides), serving simultaneously as a coolant, a fuel and a first barrier of containment. Molten salts are also used in solar panels and fuel cells. - 500 years, far from the todays waste half lives reaching millions of years. This concept, developed and tested in the 1960s in Oak Ridge, USA, was abandoned by President Richard Nixon for reasons which we would ironically consider a benefit today. For one, it didnt produce enough military-quality plutonium. To this, was added the fact that the U.S. Marines had chosen water-pressurized reactors for all their nuclear submarines, an option also taken by Westinghouse for the vast majority of its reactors built throughout the world for the civilian sector.

The Chinese offensive

While nations of the west spread doubts and fears of this vital technology while chopping their budgets, China is patiently getting ready to move forward in giant leaps and bounds. For China, the aim is not simply to have about one hundred classic reactors produced between now and 2030, but to become a the world leader in the cutting edge nuclear of the future, efficient, ecological and much safer than anything yet created. To this must be added the aim of gaining a large degree of energy independence. It is ironic to note that in 2010, 95% of uranium consumed in China came from imports, while due to the abundance of rare earths in its soil, the country is blessed with considerable reserves of thorium.

The Ideal Reactor

But there is more. The MSFR is a real all-in-one kit: a high-temperature reactor whose efficiency is superior to most of todays reactors and its heat allows for seawater desalination. As a regenerator, it allows for the multiplication of the fuel while crushing waste accumulated by the civilian and military nuclear sectors. The reactor is easy to in-


In January 2011, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) had announced that it would launch a vast project of R&D for thorium-associated MSFR. Three months ago, in June 2012, the American Department of Energy (DOE) signed an agreement of cooperation on this matter with CAS. It is Chinese academician Jiang Mianheng (son of former Prime Minister Jiang Zhemin) who is co-director of the steering committee. He also led the CAS delegation that came to Oak Ridge to discuss the MSFR with former American researchLeading advocate for the Thorium cycle and internaers. tional collaboration Jiang Mianheng.

industry that will permit, not only the creation of medical isotopes but also the production of hydrogen for fuel cells and the mass desalination of water. Of utmost importance, the development of these advanced reactors will ensure that a condition outside of the current logic of diminishing resource returns is created. In this thorium driven economy China will not be forced to rely upon those scarce fossil fuels now monopolized by a handful of cartels steered by the London centered financial oligarchy. As nations allied with China such as Russia, India and Argentina are also realizing that their mutual survival depends upon vigorous nuclear programs in order to become fully energy self sufficient, it can only be hoped that other nations of the west learn their lesson, drop the genocidal practice of green economics, and denuclearization and return to the highly dense energy sources such as Thorium which a modern reindustrialized society requires.

One Billion Invested

On August 6th, 2012, Ken Chun from CAS, gave a presentation at Berkeley University in California about the Chinas MSFR program. In short, Mr Chun revealed that China has invested 350 million dollars (some estimates assert billion) in the construction of two experimental reactors. Although CAS has hundreds of research centers, the main contributor is the Shanghai Institute of applied Physics (SIAP). China already built a facility that could welcome 500 researchers, engineers and technicians, which currently operates molten salts loops. The first reactor will be studied in details in 2013. Built in 2014, it will reach criticality end of 2015. This first 2 MW reactor which will use thorium in a solid fuel form will be cooled by molten salts. The second reactor, also 2 MW, will reach criticality in 2017. It will use a molten salt liquid fuel. For now, many details are still to be worked out. In any case, according to the success of those prototypes, China will then develop a steering program with a reactor of approximately 10 MW, followed by a demonstration program with a reactor of approximately 100 MW. Chinas objective is not simply to produce those reactors, but to guarantee itself the intellectual property rights linked to the implementation of (1) Criticality refersCommercially, China is moving this technology. to the point at which the nuclear fission reaction becomes self-sustaining, in the United to outpace everyone else. Although with the number of neutrons generated through fission becoming States, Canada, England and France, a modest equal to the number of neutrons absorbed or which esawareness is gradually taking shape among recape the reactor. day, the Chinese program is the searchers, to this most important national initiative concerning an


During their Summer meeting at the G-20 summit in Mexico, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Argentine President Cristina Fernndez de Kirchner mapped out several strategically important areas in which the two governments want to broaden their cooperation which has driven the British Empire wild.

pany to participate in ArgenArgentina and Russia Collaboration Advances the modernization ofofficials tina's railroads. A delegation of Russian from that agency is visit Argentina Putin and Cristina Fernndez expected to with public and Discussed shortly to begin negotiations both private sector leaders. Projects include improving Exciting Potential forand upgradingas certainasspecific linesthe railroad Cooperation with new technologies, well revitalizing Putin also invited Fernndez to use the occasion of the September 2013 G-20 meeting in Moscow Russia is now the President of the G-20to spend several days in Russia for a state visit to really get to know the country. Fernndez invited Putin to visit Argentina as well. According to yesterday's Russia Today, the two heads of state discussed hydrocarbons and nuclear energy, transportation and railroad development, and agriculture and agro-industry as key areas for greater cooperation. There are reportedly negotiations already going on in Moscow and Buenos Aires by relevant officials in each of these sectors. Officials from Russia's Gazprom announced from Moscow that they intend to contact the new leadership of Argentina's recently-renationalized YPF oil firm to discuss a specific work plan for cooperation in the exploration, exploitation, and distribution of natural gas in Argentina, with the goal also of collaborating with YPF throughout the Mercosur (Common Market of the South) region, which includes Brazil, Uruguay, and Paraguay. Gazprom is especially interested in working with Argentina to exploit the enormous Vaca Muerta shale gas deposit in the Patagonia, in offshore exploration of Argentina's continental shelf, and also in several joint oil projects inside Russia. Cooperation in nuclear energy is also a top agenda item. Officials from Rosatom, Russia's nuclear energy agency, are already in discussions with leaders of Argentina's NASA, the agency that oversees reactor construction, as well as with the state-run technology company INVAP, to evaluate Russian participation in the building of the two new fourth-generation reactors that Argentina wants to build. Crucial also is the invitation that Argentine officials have extended to Russia's state railroad com30

machine shops that have been used historically to train and upgrade personnel. But large projects, such as a bi-oceanic railroad and construction of underground lines, are also on the agenda. Putin would like Argentina to provide the technology and know-how to help develop Russian agriculture and beef industries, including breeding animals and marketing. Argentine technical and agro experts are already planning trips to Riazan and Smolensk to begin work in these areas. Argentine assistance in the processing and marketing of soybeans is another area of cooperation that has been discussed among business groups in both countries. Argentina is a keyPresident de Kirchner supplier of soy to Argentine Russia and China. and Russian President Putin discuss
a broad spectrum of development prospects on energy and infrastructure

International Reports
Saudis Officer Leading Syrian Rebels Killed in Idlib: Another Sign that the War is Already Regional
Oct. 14 (EIRNS)--Not only is the British Empire's Saudi Arabia arm building up and funding and supplying the neo-Salafi terrorists against Syria, the Saudis are directly on the ground fighting the war against Syria. The Arabic paper, Al Alam, reported that Syrian government troops have killed a Saudi military officer in the northwestern province of Idlib, about 73 kilometers south of Aleppo. Russia's RIA Novosti picked up the story on Oct. 14, and identified the Saudi officer as Mohammad Salem al-Harbi, saying he was killed in heavy fighting on Saturday. The direct involvement of a Saudi officer leading the Syrian rebels is just another indication of the spread of the war to a regional war that, with the action by NATO member Turkey, in bringing down a Syrian airliner on its way from Moscow, also directly confronted Russia. In a series of interviews and statements, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said, following the airliner incident on Oct. 12, that Turkey had refused to allow Russian diplomats to speak to Russian citizens aboard the flight. Russia has proposed an emergency military-to-military channel of communication between Syria and Turkey to avoid any further hostile incidents that can lead to all-out war, to a NATO confrontation. While the Syrian government has welcomed this proposal, Turkey has not responded. Meanwhile, the London Telegraph has put out a story -- not confirmed -- that the UN Security Council's envoy to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, is drawing up a plan for a force of 3,000 peacekeepers to ``enforce a truce'' in Syria. However, even the Telegraph notes that there are almost no possibilities for this plan to succeed: Major Arab countries are excluded because they are already supporting the rebels, and the British and U.S. would not be acceptable because of their role in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only sure way to stop the fighting is to force the SaudiTurkey-Qatar pipeline of weapons and fighters to be closed down immediately. But this pipeline of death is open courtesy of British agent Obama and the British Empire. (mjs)

ment is making a point of principle: It is the UN which establishes the international rule of law, not NATO or particular countries. [NBS]

Russia Will Intensify Its War on Afghan Drugs, From Space

Oct. 13 (LPAC)--Russian scientists and engineers are developing new state-of-the-art Earth remote sensing technologies that can fly on its Resurs series of satellites, in order to pinpoint farms that are growing illegal crops. These high resolution hyper -spectrometer instruments would be able to identify drug crops to within one meter, Russia Today (RT) reported Oct. 11th. The spectrometers, with 196 channels, or spectral lines, that can be measured, would be able to effectively discriminate between different plant species. ``Plants, in composition, are slightly different, and, therefore, can be identified in different regions of the...[electromagnetic] spectrum,'' Andrei Shokol, director of the Russian Research Center for Earth Operative [Observation] Monitoring, told RT. U.S. technologies have focused on tracking the activities and infrastructure of Latin American drug cartels, to help interdiction. This system would zoom in on finding the crops in the fields. It is estimated, RT reports, that more than 30,000 people die every year in Russia due to illegal drugs. They estimate that Afghan farmers produce 90% of the world's heroin. [mgf]

Tony Blair in Illinois on the Obama Campaign Trail

Oct. 13 (LPAC)--Earlier this week, Tony Blair, HMS Operative, was in Decatur, Illinois, "on the campaign trail for Obama," as reported by the London {Daily Mail} yesterday. Blair's advance schedule is being kept secret, per usual. But, as the {Mail} notes, in May this year, Blair was acknowledged as an official adviser to the Obama Presidential re-election drive, and would be campaigning for him. On October 11, Blair was at the Chicago City Hall, meeting with Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a cohort since the 1990s, in imposing Trans-Atlantic imperial policies. Blair attended a meeting in Chicago of the Zurich Advisory group. In Decatur, Blair was photographed with two other Obama campaigners, the Desperate Housewives castmember, Eva Langoria (who spoke at the Democratic Convention in September), and Warren Buffett's son, Howard Buffett, who has been given the philanthropo-fascist franchise to appear as the friend-of-thefarmer. Blair was attired in down-on-the-farm denims and plaid. Last night, Lyndon LaRouche stated during his Friday Project webcast, when discussing Obama's British Empire pedigree as a "trained, controllable puppet," that, "First of all, if you are observant, you know that the British Queen controls Obama, totally! She created him, she controls him, she has her man, Tony Blair, sitting in Chicago making sure that the Obama machine is in conformity, and they control money. They also have British money, which comes from some places in Britain, where it's basically drug money...." (gp_/mgm)

Russia Demands UN Mandate for Cooperation on Afghanistan

Oct. 11, 2012 (LPAC)--RUSSIA reacted immediately and sharply to the NATO decision, announced this week, to continue NATO's deployment in Afghanistan after the official withdrawal date of 2014. Nikolay Korchunov, Russia's acting ambassador to NATO, responding to written questions from Reuters, said that "an international mandate" was "a pre-condition both for carrying on the operation and for our cooperation with NATO on that issue post-2014." He specified, that "international mandate" meant a new Security Council resolution. While Russia has clearly been in support of the Afghan mission, to the extent it is aimed at controlling the devastating drugs and terror exported from the region, and has played an indispensable role in transport of supplies and people, the Putin govern-


U.S. Intel Denounces Obama's Effort To Place Blame on Intelligence Community

Oct. 12 (LPAC)--The Romney Presidential campaign has posted the following press release on its website, issued by former CIA director Michael Hayden and former Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff: "During the Vice Presidential debate, we were disappointed to see Vice President Biden blame the intelligence community for the inconsistent and shifting response of the Obama Administration to the terrorist attacks in Benghazi. Given what has emerged publicly about the intelligence available before, during, and after the September 11 attack, it is clear that any failure was not on the part of the intelligence community, but on the part of White House decision-makers who should have listened to, and acted on, available intelligence. Blaming those who put their lives on the line is not the kind of leadership this country needs." [mob]

today, Tatad quoted Halga on the danger of war driven by the collaps of the financial system: "Some worthies at Rhodes were genuinely concerned that having accurately predicted the transatlantic meltdown long before it occurred, they might again be proved right about their apprehensions of a Middle East war erupting not in some distant future, but in the short term. `The accelerating collapse of the transatlantic system is exerting such intense pressure on the dynamic driving the danger of war that humanity could crash into a brick wall,' the global activist Helga Zepp-LaRouche told the closing session of the Dialogue. "The US and European liquidity expansion measures have led to a hyper-inflationary printing of money, with its life-shortening effect upon millions of people in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. It threatens to plunge Europe into a firestorm of unprecedented proportions,' she said. "That may alarm," Sen. Tatad continued. "But it needs to be said and somebody has to say it, for the war drums are getting louder. Iran says it is committed to a policy of nuclear energy for all, and nuclear weapons for none. At Rhodes, support was expressed for a nuclear weapons-free zone. Yet at the 3rd Singapore Global Dialogue earlier in September, a coldblooded academic suggested the time to hit Iran was now, before it develops its own nuclear bomb. "It seems to me that no nation threatens the peace merely by its sheer war-making capacity. It becomes the enemy of peace when it begins to believe that war -- instead of dialogue and peaceful engagement -- is the best way to express its power, and solve its problems." [MOB]

Media and Financial Vultures Launch New Assault on Argentina

Oct. 12 (LPAC)--The so-called Global Editors' Network (GEN), based in Paris, prominently backed by the vulture fund lobby group, American Task Force Argentina (ATFA), has just issued a fraudulent "alert" to world media to protest against President Cristina Fernndez de Kirchner for issuing an alleged "intolerable threat to press freedom," aimed at the Clarn media monopoly. In reality, the call is a ratcheting up of the international campaign by City of London-affiliated media outlets and financial predators such as ATFA, aimed at overthrowing the Argentine President to reverse an economic policy the City of London finds so offensive. Clarn, in league with the daily {La Nacion}, speaks for those same British-loving financial interests which have been whipping up opposition to the government, creating an environment of violence and threats targetting the President personally. The GEN argues that the Clarn media goup, which it absurdly calls "independent media," is under attack simply because it is a "critic" of the government. But, this "independent" Clarn not only owns 240 cable-TV stations, 10 radio stations, and four TV channels; it also owns the country's only newsprint company, Papel Prensa, which CEO Hector Magnetto, in collaboration with executives of {La Nacion}, reportedly took over from the Graiver family in 1976, by conspiring with members of the 1976 -83 military dictatorship. Graiver family members were subsequently jailed and tortured, and executives of both dailies still face trials for human rights violations. In keeping with the new national media law, Clarn has been given until Dec. 7 to break up its monopoly or face auctioningoff of its licenses to other media. [crr]

IMF Geeks that Financial Crisis Is Coming

Oct. 10, 2012 (EIRNS)--Even the International Monetary Fund cannot fail to see that a global financial blowout is upon us. The language of its semi-annual Global Financial (In)Stability Report, issued on the eve of the IMF Annual Meeting in Tokyo, is more honest than usual for a bunch of financier toadies. "Mounting Risks, Euro Area Worries Fuel Financial Instability," is the headline on the press release greeting visitors to the IMF website. "Risks to financial stability" have increased since our April 2012 report, they write. "Confidence in the global financial system has become very fragile," and "the euro area crisis remains the principal source of concern." Despite the ECB's exceptional liquidity operations at the beginning of the year, Draghi's big bazooka promise in July, and the ECB's September measures "to increase liquidity support, capital flight is "undermining the very foundations of the union." Fueling chaos ("market fragmentation") is the fear that countries may soon leave the Euro and return to their national currencies ("redenomination risks"). The report projects that the way things are heading, European banks could see asset shrinkage (capital flight, drop in valuations, etc.) of as much as $2.8 trillion to $4.5 trillion through the end of 2013. Their solution? "More speed is needed now" in implementing the policies which they admit have resolved nothing. [GGS]

LaRouche Friend in Philippines Covers Helga in Rhodes

Francisco "Kit" Tatad, an advisor of former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, a Senator, a long-standing friend of LaRouche, and more recently an advisor to current Vice President Binay, was a speaker at the Rhodes conference, as was Helga Zepp LaRouche. In his regular column in the Manila Standard 32

US Pork Producers File New Appeal to Obama To Lift Ethanol Mandate, Citing "Frightening Prospect" of Inability To Feed Animals
Oct. 13 (LPAC)--The National Pork Producers Council, representing 67,000 pork farming operations, filed a new appeal on Oct. 11, with the Obama Administration, for a "Waiver of a Portion of the Renewable Fuels Standard," citing the current "price shock" and corn scarcity causing terrible harm to livestock operations. The 27-page filing stated at the outset, "In light of the ongoing disastrous drought that continues to afflict our nation, and the outsized impact of the RFS on the supply of ever finite levels of corn, EPA's consideration of these petitions and requests for a waiver of the RFS mandate is an urgent matter. EPA's granting of a full or partial waiver of the RFS is necessary to avert the severe economic harm that has been experienced in 2012 by pork producers and the communities and states they live in, and will continue to manifest itself in 2013 and beyond. Therefore, we recommend that you issue a waiver for the maximum duration allowed under Clear Air act section 211(o)(7)." The Environmental Protection Agency, which technically could do this at any time, is refusing to act, under the Obama subservience to the British Empire policy of creating conditions for depopulation. The Pork Producers' document gives a chart, showing prices for the main animal-feed products, corn and soybeans, from 1950 to the present, highlighting the price spikes of the last four years of economic breakdown. Unless there is a shift in Federal policy, worse is to come. It states, that under conditions where the volume of corn is not rising, and in fact, decreasing, then the food system is: "put at risk of being wholly incapable of adjusting and mitigating the worst effects of severe supply shocks like that resulting from this year's drought, particularly if such a supply shock is repeated two-years in a row...Indeed, the severe harm that will occur in 2013 will become even more manifested in 2014, should there be any kind of supply chock in corn production in 2013... "The severe harm pork producers will suffer in 2012 and 2013, however, pales in comparison to what it would be like in 2014, where this harm would be compounded by explosively higher prices and crippling credit and liquidity shortfalls, and creating the frightening prospect that many producers will find themselves unable to assure stable access to an adequate local supply of corn to feed their animals."

* CALIFORNIA. A long-standing poultry producer, Zacky Farms LLC filed for Ch. 11 bankruptcy Oct. 10, citing the cost of grains used in animal feeds. Processing for mostly private labels, Zacky, founded in 1928, accounts for nearly 2% of U.S. turkey production. (mgm) OBAMA TELLS WORLD LEADERS {NOT} TO ACT ON FOOD CRISIS; AGRICULTURE MINISTERS MEET IN ROME OCT. 16 Oct. 13 (LPAC)--The Obama Administration on Oct. 4 decreed that the world's governments should {NOT} move to intervene in the fast-worsening crisis of food scarcity and hyperinflation, because, it lied, "markets are functioning." This is a straight depopulation pronouncement. The full text is below. The intent was made clear in the report on low world grain stocks, issued by the Administration's own Agriculture Department, infamous in recent years for understating the situation. World grain stocks--that is, grain on hand in any form, under the control of any entity, usually the mega-grain cartels--are plunging. U.S. corn stocks as of 2013, are headed to levels of 17 years ago; soybean stocks going downward to 8 years ago. Bins are emptying. The rush is on, from those with funds, to line up the remaining, scarce food. It's down to bushels and tons. For example, Africa imports about 30 million tons of wheat a year. Where is it to come from? There is no foreseeable let-up in culling and liquidation of herds. World farm ministers will meet in Rome on Oct. 16 on the situation, during what is scheduled as World Food Week. Oct. 15-20, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization's Committee on World Food Security meets in Rome. The Obama Administration's statement against any of these groups or member governments of the Group of 20 taking action, was issued Oct. 4, by the United States Mission to the UN Agencies in Rome (three of which are the world's top food organizations). The statement follows in full: "United States, as chair of the G-20 Agricultural Market Information System Group, Confirms Agricultural Commodity Markets are Functioning "Rome, October 4, 2012 "The United States, as Chair of the G-20 Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS) group, has consulted with G-20 and other experts at the October 3-4 regularly scheduled AMIS meeting in Rome. The U.S. concurs in the judgment of the G-20 AMIS representatives that in light of the information available to us today, agricultural commodity markets are functioning and a meeting of the Rapid Response Forum is not necessary at this time. "Governments around the world, including large agricu ltural exporters in G-20, have exercised prudence and responsibility in policy-making, including by avoiding export bans that exacerbated volatility in 2007-2008." (mgm)

A few current headline events document the livestock-meat chain breakdown crisis:
* CANADA. The second-largest pork producer in Canada declared bankruptcy in September. Saskatchewan-based Big Sky Farms filed; and also, Manitoba-based Puratone Corp. Both cited the factor of high feed costs, specifically that it takes C$180 to raise a hog, which is fetching only C$150 on the market right now. Canada is the world's third largest pork exporting nation. In China, steps are being taken to stockpile pork in meat-lockers, as a buffer against shortages to come.


LaRouche Webcast

A Pathway Out of Our Greatest Crisis

Lyndon LaRouche gave this address on Oct. 5, 2012, as the first in a series of Friday evening webcasts leading up to the Nov. 6 elections, to be aired at larouchepac.com. Matthew Odgen of LPAC-TV moderated; a dialogue with viewers follows LaRouche's opening remarks. Visit www.larouchepac.com for the full video. Thank you. We shall get at the business.... We need a new national policy, a new national policy perspective. We're in the process of a general breakdown crisis of the trans-Atlantic economy in particular, with emphasis on the United States, which is in a financial breakdown crisis at present. Western and Central Europe are entrapped in an increasingly hyperinflationary breakdown crisis. And if Europe continues to function in that way, with this hyperinflationary program, which has been recently installed on top of a previous hyperinflationary program, you're not going to see much of Europe. We have to change that. Now, the only solution for the problems of the United States, in terms of economic and related problemswhen I say related problems: economics, physical economics in particular, is central to the economy of the nation and its people as a whole. tion, which would mean that whatever happens in a few months, if it continues in this way, under Obama, for example, there isn't going to be a United States. There's going to be a piece of wreckage, where there once was one. The rate of starvation is there. The rate of a great, crucial food shortage for the people of the United States will continue, if Obama remains in office. That does not say that I know what the other candidates are going to do. There are several of them in the wings presently. But the point is that if Obama remains President, you're going to see mass starvation increasing in the United States, especially in areas which used to be the foodgrowing areas. And people are going to start dying en masse, out of the effects and side effects of hunger. When people have no food at all, they tend to eat all kinds of things just to survive. And they often die of the effects of what they eat. That's the condition that the continuation of the Obama Administration represents for the United States in the coming period. So Glass-Steagall is the only thing that can save the United States, as it saved the United States before, with the Franklin Roosevelt Administration. Go back to it. That gets us out of the mess. But, Glass-Steagall of course means not cancelling the non-included debt, but it means that nonincluded debt is going to go bankrupt all on its own, because most of it is going to be wiped out. It's purely speculative. It's worthless. It's hyperinflationary.

Recovery Begins with Glass-Steagall

So, the first thing we have to doand there is no alternative, and the same thing is true for Europethere is no possibility of the survival of the United States and/or of Europe, without a Glass-Steagall law. They have in Europe a ringfencing version as a so-called substitute for GlassSteagall. It doesn't work. It's just suicide on a slower basis. So therefore, Glass-Steagall is the first action. Without Glass-Steagall, there's not going to be a United States, because we're now engaged, ourselves as a nation, in a hyperinflationary accelera-


And to bring the system under control, you just have say that Glass-Steagall will take care of, on behalf of the government, the private-public [commercial, non -speculative] banking system; and the other kind of banking [investment banking] will just have to learn how to survive on its own good behaviorwhich will happen, as it happened under Roosevelt. But there is a much more serious problem.

So the idea of having people trust the Federal government to guarantee the projects, will mean that we can put, on that account alone, 14 million people to work, in highly productive employment. That changes the character of the United States. Now, there are many other things. There are areas, for example, in the northern part of the Eastern states of the United States: We used to have an auto industry, and accompanying an auto industry and a manufacturing industry, we had many others; we had aircraft industries. During World War II, we had built up the make-everything-industry, including for warfare. We must go back to that. That's a couple more million jobs to be added to the 14. And there are other programs, of the same type; which means we have to go to this conception, which is the original conception of credit of the United States under its Constitution. So simply going back to that Constitutional provision will be sufficient to get, not riches for everyone, but a recovery and a genuine rate of growth, and a prospect of the future. The greatest problem in the United States today is the fact that people have become more and more ignorant in every practical way. Because they don't, first of all, have employment of the type that bespeaks productive power, and productive power is very close to intellectual power, to mental power. And that's been lost. People are dumped on the streets, they're dumped out of their jobs. They don't have a future under the present system; under the Obama system, and the two toad-like systems [G.W. Bush Administrations] before that.

A National Credit System

So now, the problem is, we have to have a national credit system. Once we have cleaned up the banking systembecause, remember, most of the banking system represents worthless assetsmost of the Wall Street and similar kinds of entities, represent worthless assets, which the United States can not, under Glass-Steagall, bail out. Now that means that the total amount of banking capability, of reserves and credit available, would be limited. But there's a remedy for it. We have to create a national banking system, which has another feature. A national banking system will be based on the borrowing of credit which is secured and guaranteed, as an asset, by the Federal government; which means that wherever the banking systemor the proper banking systemcomes up with a case which is, in terms of the government, going to work to the good of the economy of the United States, that will be taken seriously into account.


One of the biggest projects we have in mind is the NAWAPA [North American Water and Power Alliance][1] project. Now this has been kicking around since the assassination of John F. Kennedy, or shortly after that. If that program had been implemented, you would not have a water crisis in North America today. You would not have most of the problems of the western area of the United States. And most of the shortage of the ability to grow crops and all these sorts of things, would have been cured. But that would be one of the greatest driver programs, with about 14 million people employed suddenly, in this process of creating a North American water management system, which will solve the general threats of dessication in North America, by itself. www.larouchepac.com/nawapa1964


So this thing has to change; we have to go back to what we were doing as long as John Kennedy was alive as President. Because in the history of the United States, the assassination of Kennedy and failure of relevant powers to investigate the actual crime of his assassination led to a decline in the U.S. economy; in its physical economy, in the condition of life of our people, which has been going for all this period since the time that Jack Kennedy was assassinated. We have never had a period under any President since the assassination of John F. Kennedy when there was actually a net per capita improvement in the economy of the United States. So what this means is, going back to the NAWAPA project, which is one of the projects which was on the agenda in the period when Kennedy was assassinated. And 14 million jobs would have been put into work at that time, had Jack lived or had the investigation of his assassination been taken into account. So, we're going back to the time we started to take a nosedive. We have some things which were going on then which were good, but they were not sufficient to compensate for what happened after the Kennedy assassination. The space program: There was a high-tech driver program around Massachusetts; they had a good time with it because they wanted it; one of the big beneficiaries of that. But that project now, of course, has been crushed by Obama. But it was never sufficient to make up for the loss of productivity which followed the assassination of Jack Kennedy; and of course, the long war, the ten years virtually, of war in Southeast Asia, which should never have happened. Actually, Kennedy was killed primarily because he opposed the war in Southeast Asia, which Douglas MacArthur, who was a key advisor on this, said, "Don't do it. No land wars in Asia for the United States." And what that did, that war killed off the morals and future and happiness of a good part of our population. It put us really on the slide, and that decade went down to the dirt. We didn't do too well under another President. Another President came along, and he had some good ideas, he did some good things, but he wasn't allowed to do too much. So, the United States has actually been in a process over these successive

generations, since the assassination of Kennedy, has been in a downslide morally, culturally, and every other way. And each generation tries to make it out for themselves, but they don't see the pattern. They don't see the pattern, that we have been going downhill. And with the Green policy, which had already started at the time that Kennedy was pushing things up, the Green policy has destroyed the United States morally as well as physically, economically. So these things have to be changed.

Money Does Not Have Intrinsic Value

But the other part of this thing is, people make the mistakeand Glass-Steagall points in that directionpeople make the mistake of thinking that money has an intrinsic value. Money does not have an intrinsic value. The use of money as a presumed value goes back a long ways, it goes along with what is called the oligarchical system. It goes back actually to the siege of Troy, where the killing of a whole people, a mass murder of a whole people occurred. And this has happened a number of times in European history since that time. Just mass killing of people. Why? On the basis of what is called a monetary system, a money system. And a money system which is of the form called an oligarchical system, where a small ruling classfat, sloppy, skinny, whatever, but useless and murderoushas reigned over nations in the European region. Now, the remarkable thing about the United States is not so remarkable. There was a fellow Nicholas of Cusaa Cardinal, one of the most famous minds in all modern history. As a matter of fact, he almost invented modern history. And before he died, his commitment was to induce Europeans who wanted to do so, to cross the great oceanand he knew where the ocean was, and he knew where the land on the other side was, because the scientists at that time knew that information. They knew the size of the Earth; they knew the approximate size of the ocean, and Columbus was able, based on the information developed for him by Nicholas of Cusa and others, to plot a course, which he met. He arrived when he expected to, and he arrived as he expected to. So, there was a development.


Out of this came, eventually, with a lot of mishaps here and there, there came a point where we started a new civilization, by Europeans, as colonists, moving across the Atlantic Ocean into the Americas. Now the particularly most successful case was that in North America, and the greatest concentration of success in the early days of that century was Boston. That effort, which was in Massachusetts, which was the foundation of the creation of the United States, and everything that our system meant, was crushed by the British, by William of Orange and his types. So that, for a time, our Massachusetts Bay Colony and its ancillaries continued to function, but they were crushed. But nonetheless, the effort came back with a struggle since 1763, the Peace of Paris. And suddenly there is a division; the Americans began to assemble again against the British Empire. The British Empire had been first installed as an empire on the planet. It was not the royal family, the royal system had not been changed; but that had changed in 1763. At that point there was a struggle that began with the ending of the French and Indian War, which coincided with that first Peace of Paris. Out of this came a struggle from within North America, within what became the United States, to establish a republic, based on the same principles which the Massachusetts Bay Colony had brought into being with its own automatic currencynot based on a monetarist system, but based on a credit system. When the U.S. Constitution was first formed, the provision was for a credit system, not a monetarist system. Monetarism came in because of the loans and debts of the United States at that time, in which other people were using money to assist the United States or to collect debts from the United States. And that is where this problem came up. But intrinsically, in our constitutional principle, the United States was founded on a tradition which goes back to Nicholas of Cusa, which goes back to the Massachusetts Bay Colony's development, and went to the idea of a credit system, which is the definition of our constitutional monetary system. It's not a monetarist system. It's a credit system, not a money system.

And therefore, our return to those principles of that American Constitution, that understanding of its historic significance, is what is required. So therefore, we make these changes: Glass-Steagall, no compromise, Glass-Steagall as Roosevelt defined it; ironclad, no change. That's the precondition for our recovery and our survival. And any future Presidency of the United States at this time must adopt that policy, or they're not fit to rule. We have to be clear on that. There are other problemsnational credit: We have to organize the national credit system as a national credit system, the way it was intended by John Quincy Adams, not that maddened nitwit who replaced him [Andrew Jackson]. And we need large driver projects, which include chiefly NAWAPA, the biggest one, and the other things; and the space programwhich I'll come to in the closing part of my reportis a crucial one, and for reasons which many people may not yet know, or haven't caught up with.

End the Political Party System

Now, all this means that Obama must be swept out of office now. This is not a partisan situation or question. This is not a partisan issue. The greatest error in the United States, as was understood by George Washington and others, was the establishment of a political party system, a national political party system. That was the greatest piece of stupidity ever imposed upon the United States by itself; and Andrew Jackson was the most typical of the infected creatures who participated in that. But the idea of a Republican and Democratic Partythis procedure was wrong, because what it led to was all these other kinds of management problems. So we have to get back to a credit system under our Constitution. There's no change in principle in order to do that. And as George Washington understood, and others, repeatedly, the problem of the United States was the introduction of a party system, a national party system. And there should be no national party system, and that should be done now under the incoming Presidency of the United Statesthe end of the party system as such.


There are other ways of approaching this. Besides, you look at the party system: They're messes anyway. The Democratic Party, it's a mess. There's no coherence there; it's simply a bunch of gangsters with a bunch of fools following them, each trying to win for their baseball or their football team or whatever it is. And you have these football teams, and they're all impassioned to beat the other team. What about doing something for the nation, rather than trying to defeat the other team? We don't need this stuff, and the time has come to quit. Rebuild the system based on a non-party system in which the citizen has the authority, not some party. The citizen does not have to give up his independence as a citizen, but we have to have a government which is based on discussion of ideas, not this kind of lechery that we get now, and the obscenity that we just saw in the recent efforts. And Obama couldn't exist except under that kind of corrupt system. He couldn't be made President. He was losing, and then suddenly, the way the drugs are flowing across from Mexico into the United States, and in that area of the world Obama made a big victory and knocked out his competitor in the Democratic Party, and that's all he had to show for it. And he had some big muckety-mucks from Britain who are noted as the biggest thieves in the world, and they financed Obama, arranged this financing, and we've been subjected to this corruption and destruction all these years under Obama, and some clown is trying to say vote for him again. This must not happen. We can reorganize the system and its secondary features to go back to the original principle of the Constitution. Because there are two things we don't want to do, which have been done. One, is you don't want to go back to a party system. Because when you make the issue one of partisanship, like a football team or a baseball team competition, on the question of deciding policy of government, that is a piece of idiocy. You want the citizen not to vote for a team, like somebody in the stadium thinking he's investing in something, and finding what he's bought on the way out or sold on the way out.

upon to make, as George Washington had intended.

Not Worth a Troy Ounce

And the other thing we have to get rid of is the idea that money has an intrinsic value. Money has no intrinsic value. Money is no better than governments that are able to organize money, in a way that fits the national needs. Now, the idea of the money system comes from Troy. Troy ended upthey tore the whole joint down, killed most of the people, except a few kiddies and old ladies and things like that. And they set into a motion a system which is the oligarchical system, which has cursed Europe, European civilization, in one way or the other, and now the United States as well, and other nations. With this came the idea that there was gold, or silver, or something else, that had an intrinsic value, as a metal, or something of that sort, an intrinsic value. And this intrinsic value was value, and money would be based on the control of this, particularly copper, zinc, gold, silver, whateverthis thing that was used as a physical object was assigned a certain value, and the whole society was imprisoned to that money value. We don't need that. We never did. And what we saw in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, with the pinetree shilling that was introduced in that period, was a demonstration of that. And Benjamin Franklin's conception of a money system was based on that precedent, with his paper currency conception. The foundation of the system of economy of the United States, the Federal system, was based on the same principle. And it's only when we gave up the principle to outside forces that we got into trouble with our system.


You want a thinking citizen; you want the citizen to accept the habits of thinking, of thinking through decisions, of demanding the education needed for The Massacheusetts Pine Tree Schilling them to make the decisions that they've been called

We do not need a monetarist system. As a matter of fact, you've come to a time when everybody in Europe is bankrupt. They're totally bankrupt. Because the inflation under which they're living, bespeaks something worse than what existed in Germany in 1923, in the collapse of the currency then. So, we're in the process of a global collapse. Money, of whatever denomination, is no longer a control mechanism, but rather politics and political power is. And therefore, we have to go a credit system, which is well understood in history, or should be. And that means this reform, around these three principles of: Glass-Steagall; A national credit system (as opposed to this kind of banking system we've had now); and A return to production, through projects typified by NAWAPA. This is what makes sense, and what we can do. And we can just get other things out of the way.

do, is continue the process of the Obama policy now, his military and related policy, and we are going to find ourselves, in a very short time, relatively, weeks or months, you're going to seeif we don't stop ita thermonuclear war. And a thermonuclear war leads to what's called a nuclear Winter, this time a thermonuclear Winter. What happens then, is the U.S. Navy, and its submarine fleet, in particular, and other forces, combine forces to conduct a war against Russia, China, and others. Russia and China are very capable in these weapon systems. The United States is very well equipped in terms of, say, the naval system. And the naval submarines of the United States, if they take on this assignment, would very quickly reduce a good deal of this planet to nothing. It would probably take an hour and a half, and the expenditure of thermonuclear forces from the United States, from China, from Russia, and from Europe, and so forththat amount, which are probably two general waves, would turn the whole planet into what's called a nuclear Winter. A thermonuclear Winter. Because you would create weather conditions, cold weather conditions, from which it is doubtful that we would be able to maintain a population, even of the survivors of the war. And therefore, the time has come that we have to take on two things that are our enemies. One enemy is the monetarist system, which is one of the principal modes which lead us toward our destruction. The second thing is the related system to the monetary system, which is typified by the British Empire tradition, and by those within the United Kingdom, and within Saudi Arabia, who created 9/11, under an Obama who is 9/11 Twoif he gets a chance.

Nuclear Winter
I think the very existence of the United States demands that Obama be swept out of office. I know what he is. I know what his mind, so-called, is. I know what he does. And I know what his role has been. He, together with certain people who own him in England, and elsewhere, and Saudi Arabiabecause remember, this goes back to 9/11. What we're living through right now, in the United States and throughout the world, as in the recent assassination of our diplomat [Amb. Christopher Stevens], is, under Obama, we're dealing with this problem. And this is headed toward what? It's headed toward a reduction of the world population, which is decreed by the Queen of England, and a whole mass of her associates, who have decided to reduce the population of the planet from 7 billion people, estimated today, to approximately 1 billion. That process has actually been in progress. We're seeing in the world precisely those conditions which can bring on that rate of death among populations, in the United States and elsewhere. What they intend to do, as Obama makes it very clear, is launch a war, a war which would lead to a thermonuclear war. In other words, all you have to


So, therefore, the time has come that what Obama representsit's not just he himselfit's what he represents that must be swept out of office, for the sake of the very lives of every damn citizen in the United Statesand I say "damn" advisedly. Because that's what we're up against.

nated by somebody coming across from, say, a westerly direction. And at the same time, a key figure of the French government, a servant of Mitterrand's, said, effectively, that if Germany tried to unify, France would go to war against Germany. And this was backed up by the prime minister of Britain [Margaret Thatcher], and by the President of the United States, poor George Dumblebum Bush. So therefore, this process led to the euro system, which looted and destroyed these nations of Europe. And the attempt to maintain the euro system, means that Europe will not survive. Europe has now entered into a deadly hyperinflationary explosion, and it cannot survive under those policies. The euro system simply should be regarded by all Americans as an unwanted entity. Not because of the nations and people, but because of what it implies. The euro system is now hopelessly bankrupt and in a state of hyperinflationary collapse, and there's nothing in sight that's going to change that, except the will of the people. If the will of the European people says, "we're going to get rid of this, yes, fine," the United States should take a very sympathetic view of the success of that restoration of the system of sovereign nation-states, rather than the so -called euro abomination. This is not a matter of interfering in their governments, because they don't have governments any more. How can you threaten the government of a nation, when the nation has no government? And that's the case in Europe, in fact, right now.

The Natural Wealth of the Nation

So therefore, what we have to do, the idea that the United States must go to a Glass-Steagall policy, cannot be argued against by any competent, sane person. The idea of going to a national credit system, in terms of a banking system, cannot be argued against by any competent person who understands this. We cannot ever develop the monetary basis, as a simple monetary basis, to sustain a recovery of the U.S. economy from its present conditions. The only way we can do that, is by using national banking as a method of creating a credit system, which by the issue of credit, against a government debt responsibility, enables us to fund projects which are going to contribute to the natural wealth of the nation. And it's the natural wealth, not the money wealth, which is important. The natural wealth of the nation and its people. We've come to that point. The myth of money must be cancelled. The money changers must finally be discharged from government. Now, there's another problem. Europe is a problem. Europe is on the threshold of disintegration, Western and Central Europe. Because it's now entered into a phase of hyperinflation. And if that continues, hyperinflation worse than 1923 Germany, how long is that going to last? So, therefore that's our problem. We have to recognize that the euro system was a crime against the human species. The attempt to force a group of nationsand this was started actually by London, but Mitterrand, the President of France, was the key instigator of it. Germany was on the verge of being independent again, as a unified nation. And then suddenly, Chancellor Kohl, who was the leader of Germany at the time, had a friend of his [Alfred Herrhausen], who was the greatest banker in Europe at the time, the greatest in skill and capability, who was assassinated. Assassi40

A Planetary System of Cultures

So, therefore, we have to think about how we're going to reorganize the world. We're now going through a great crisis; we're on the verge of the extinction of humanity, threatened by the nuclear weapons crisis, thermonuclear weapons. Bankruptcy all over the world. Africa, which has been murdered over and over again, as a whole continent, by the British in particular, over these periods.

The world is a mess. It has elements in it which are viable, and valuable. These elements must be protected, and systems of cooperation among sovereign nation-states must be established, to ensure stability. We have to go, in one case, to a global policy: a policy of global sovereign nation-states, entered into systems of cooperation, and deliberation on cooperation. That's what we require. We're now faced, as I said, not only with a nuclear Winterand Obama's existence, his policy, what he did in Benghazi, in fact did, is headed toward a nuclear Winter, a thermonuclear Winter. And what they're trying to do in pushing something against Iranagain the same thing. What they're doing in Turkey, the same thing. These things are chiefly coming from the United States, and from the Obama Administration under British direction, and Saudi direction. The British empire is actually partly the Saudi empire. And these forces are there. So, what are we going to do? We're going to reestablish our system of sovereign nation-states; secure agreement among nations to go to a credit system, rather than a monetarist system; set up systems of credit which enable nations to rebuild, and to create stability; re-establish sovereignty. Now, sovereignty means this: It means that in the history of mankind, you have a variation in cultures, and people function, not only on the basis of their nationality, but they function on the basis of the culture that nationality is assumed to represent. We need a planetary system of cultures, of national cultures. It just means, that we restore the best we had earlier, and put some more growth in it. Now, how do we get to a world without war, without world war? Yes, you can have all kinds of quarrels and so forth, up to a rather intense state, if things are managed properly. But world war, or general war approximating world war, is no longer feasible in the age of thermonuclear weapons and similar kinds of weapons. We can't have it.

not the only problem. We've got a problem with a lot of big rocks, called satellites; and they're swarming, particularly to our attention, between the orbit of Mars and the orbit of Venus. We know a small percentile of these asteroids, and they come in all kinds of flavors and sizes. And if they hit the Earth, as they do occasionally, they will take out an area, say, comparable to San Francisco Baysomething like that getting wiped out, and all the people in it getting wiped out. That can happen. Smaller events of that type can happen. Larger ones can rarely happen. And a really big one, if a really big satellite hits the Earth, then no more people. So therefore, the defense of Earth, while it has not been much discussed, was actually being pushed as an issue and a project at the time that I was pushing for the SDI. And that effort has continued. Today we find ourselves in a position where we do not have the kinds of information we need, let alone the equipment we need, to get out there and steer some of these asteroidsfirst of all, locate them; steer them in such a way they do not collide with Earth. Because they would either do damage to life on Earth, or they totally destroy human life on Earth, and all life on Earth.

A Defense of Earth
But we've got another problem before us. That's

So therefore, we have a mission now, and it's becoming more acute as time passes, that we must get out there, between the area of Earth and Mars in particular, and build up systems of cooperation, as with Curiosity on Mars; and by using the speed of light of communication between the systems we establish on Mars and the systems on Earth and so forth, we're going to have to develop a system by which we can detect these satellites that are floating around, and intervene to steer them away from a collision with Earth. And this is typical of the kind of problem that we have to deal with in the coming period. We have to totally reverse the idiocy and the crimes that were done by Obama, in terms of the space program. The problem with the space program already, was we were not doing enough to meet this challenge. We weren't giving it sufficient support to meet this challenge. And now the time has come that Obama has tried to destroy it all! And that is a crime against humanity: When a head of state acts to intervene in world affairs, to block and halt a means necessary to preserve the very existence of the human species, that is what we will not tolerate. And Obama, for that reason alone, should be just quickly ushered out the gate, or probably impeached. We probably can't wait longer. We should probably get him out of there now. But that's the challenge.

selves, I guess. But the point is, we have to build up a new political system which is based on, for us, our national tradition. I don't think that most people in the world would disagree with us on what the United States system was, the conception of the political system. They might have some disagreement with what we've been doing, and what our policies are, and what our thinking is in many cases, but the principles are not at risk. And therefore, I think that's where we stand. If we can do that, I think we can make it. So therefore, where are we? We've got a Democratic Party and we've got this piece of junk, called Obama, who's stuck on top of it, running for President. You have the other side, and other sides inbetween. We have to have a sort of an understanding, of coming together, and instead of taking issues and issues are deadly: When you take issues and make bargaining over issues a stake, it's the choice of issues which you have to agree upon. In other words, you don't want to have more football rivalries, or basketball rivalries, as politics. You want to say, "What is the total combination that this nation needs as a whole, that the world needs as a whole, as a composite policy?" Without that, then we don't have a solution. But Obama must go. This is not a partisan issue. This is a human issue: Obama must go! We've had, 9/11 number 1; we're getting number 2 now, under Obama. And Obama is one of the people who's been blocking the exposure of the evidence of who did what, in number 1! The evidence is there. Throw this SOB out of office now! Get the voters to do that, too. Throw the guy out! And partisan loyalties do not provide any excuse for tolerating Obama any more.

The Worst of All Possible Governments

So now, that's where we stand. We have, on the one hand, the worst government in most parts of the world that we've seen in a long time. And the U.S. government under Obama is the worst: The worst of all possible governments! You wouldn't think that anybody could do that, but that's it. He is. Only the Saudis, if they were capable, would be equally evil. So, we're at that point. We have an understanding of what this nonsense is. We have a system in which you don't have clear party solidity. The Republican Party is not a solid creature; the Democratic Party is not a solid creature. And you have a lot of other loose groups around who don't really agree with either! Or they don't agree even with themselves, because they don't even trust them42

The Canadian Patriot

We have now come to the point that mankind must either grow up and accept his destiny as a galactic species, or perish. This choice is not an exaggeration, but rather a fact defined by the reality of humanitys modern relationship to the atom. After the highly dense interval of creative discovery during the second half of the 19th century and first half of the 20th, mankind had found itself facing a degree of power that was unimaginable by all previous generations. Finally, the limits of imagination governing a world of fixed energy, fixed motion, fixed resources melted away through the radiative power emanating from seemingly material rocks. After the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Wall Street stooge Harry Trumans dropping the bombs onto a defeated Japan in 1945, the thought consuming all scientists was : can humanity ever be trusted to use such power responsibly? We have now reached a point of decision which will define the unfolding of human history for a very long time to come. As another Wall Street-London Stooge sits in the White House, an encirclement of Russia and China is underway with a large deployment of U.S. Military capabilities, including two Ohio class submarines carrying Trident nuclear warheads in the Pacific theater. Provocations for war are artificially enflamed throughout hotspots the world over and an economic meltdown of the bubble economy is revealing to a sleeping world that the physical economic foundations so necessary for humanitys continual survival have been utterly dismantled. Within this seemingly impossible conflagration of events, leading officials across Russia and China have warned starkly of the danger of thermonuclear war but have also echoed the programmatic solutions of American economist Lyndon LaRouche, in turning this crisis into a revolutionary paradigm shift towards the future. Were the policies advocated by Dmitry Rogozins Strategic Defence of the Earth and the greater challenge of space exploration and colonization adopted in the brief time ahead, an opportunity to bring the power of the atom into conformity with humanitys needs be assured. The acceptance of this mission would entail not only reversing the current drive for war and aggression with the eastern alliance, but a forceful implementation of the Glass-Steagall bank separation would be required of a large body of cooperating sovereign nation states. The following application of productive credit via Hamiltonian national banking and a New Bretton Woods-type fixed exchange rate monetary system would be required. The majority of Shanghai Cooperation Organization nations as well as nations of the Non-Aligned Movement are enthusiastic to join such a program. Many South American Nations would love nothing more than be given a chance to develop into sovereign nations outside of the City of Londons systemic shackles. All that awaits this new possible world of progress is the cooperation of western governments, who are only now beginning to awaken after decades of post-industrial decadence. The Committee for the Republic of Canada, and our friends around the world are convinced that it is not yet too late to change destinies from one of nuclear dark age to nuclear renaissance. The creative leaps from advanced fission to thermonuclear fusion and to our necessarily inevitable harnessing of MatterAnti-Matter processes is calling humanity to do nothing less than bend the shape of physical space time in a way never before dreamed before. Two thirds of the worlds population are ready. Are you?