Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Company Update
Just in Time
latex
gloves
tire bycycles pedal
rubber latex
windshield trim
shoes, sandals
crumb rubber
apparel
diving suit
oil seal
industrial equipment
tubes
Rubber Trees
baby gear
resin
oil
oil paint
varnish
rubber seeds
shell
filler
briquettes
oilcake
furniture
cattle feed
rubber wood
building materials
Source: BPKM
Source: Company
Strategically Located
J.A. Wattie is quite strategically located as you compare JAWAs plantation with the first picture where Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BPKM) had drawn a map for potential rubber processing cluster. Logistic wise, they are strategically located. With the moratorium law out and a denser market, JAWA could be an asset play in terms of strategically located land ownership. 3
Auto Sales
Chinas
600,000.00
450,000.00
300,000.00
150,000.00 -
CAGR for their auto sales from year 2005 2010 is 28%, followed by India 13% and then by Indonesia 7%. Rubber downstream product is tires. Auto sale is pretty much correlated with tire sales thus rubber industry has rooms to grow.
US
Source: Bloomberg
Japan
China
India
Indonesia
Change (%) %
18.33 (24.71) (27.55) (57.72) (11.81)
Change (%) %
0.12 4.44 (1.16) (5.07) 2.11
Mn
Bn
800
600 400
90 75
60 45 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09
Chinas
200
0
GDP growth for year 2010 is 3 times US GDP and as you can see from the China & US Tire Output chart beside us that Chinas tire industry is growing at a very steep pace compared to US.
China Industrial Tire Output Adjusted Automotive Parts Accessories & Tire Stores
Source: Bloomberg
US
6.0% 3.0%
0.0% -3.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011
Tire Price or Tire PPI increased 12.3% YoY and declined 0.5% MoM due to increasing raw materials price.
1Q
Source: BLS.gov
2Q
3Q
4Q
CAGR 9% 6%
1200 900
600 300 0 Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
RSS3
TSR20
ral Rubber (NR) tapped from trees and Synthetic Rubber (SR) made of derivatives from petroleum thus the close correlation to oil price movement. Rubber is consumed mainly in tires, for passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and a great variety of other tire like bicycle tires, airplane tires, and off-road tires. Due to its superior tear strength and excellent resistance to heat, natural rubber is more suitable for high performance tires used in racing cars, trucks, buses, and aircrafts.
STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF WORLD RUBBER SITUATION (000 tonnes) Natural Rubber Production 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Asia 9,399 1,839 2,057 2,405 2,740 9,042 2,175 2,071 2,728 2,663 9,637 2,398 Africa 447 98 95 112 118 423 102 110 119 129 459 104 Latin 247 64 72 55 62 253 67 75 57 64 263 73 America Total 10,128 1,985 2,230 2,570 2,905 9,690 2,361 2,271 2,904 2,865 10,401 2,571 Natural Rubber Consumption N. America 1,179 232 147 183 228 790 280 261 265 266 1,071 298 Lat. America 587 122 106 120 139 488 153 162 152 147 613 148 EU 27 1,256 203 145 223 258 829 289 282 274 287 1,132 313 Other Euro 230 38 38 48 53 177 50 57 62 58 227 65 Africa 126 25 21 25 22 94 26 26 27 23 101 28 Asia / 6,854 1,424 1,820 1,896 1,845 6,984 1,700 1,889 2,027 2,017 7,632 1,701 Oceana Total 10,175 2,044 2,267 2,484 2,534 9,329 2,496 2,677 2,806 2,799 10,778 2,552 World Surplus / -47 -59 -37 86 371 361 -135 -406 98 66 -377 19 Deficit World Stocks 1,519 1,460 1,423 1,509 1,880 1,880 1,745 1,339 1,437 1,503 1,503 1,522 Deficit of Natural Rubber; Natural Rubber Prices worse than 2008. 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 SICOM, 3,685 2,238 2,482 2,880 3,601 2,800 4,457 5,166 4,580 5,633 4,959 7,339 6,574 RSS32 SICOM, 2,530 1,328 1,524 1,834 2,516 1,800 3,098 3,023 3,145 4,253 3,380 5,251 4,672 TSR203 Source: International Rubber Study Group 6
Future of Rubber
Increasing Demand on the back of Global Economy Growth
According to a statement made by Stephen Evans, secretary general of the International Rubber Study Group during the World Rubber Summit, the IRSG predicted that global rubber consumption will increase 47.1% to 31.5 million tons by 2020 from 21.4 million tons in 2009; of that, natural rubber will account for 14.6 million tons and synthetic rubber 16.9 million tons. Tires will consume 19.4 million tons of rubber in 2020 and general rubber goods 12.1 million tons. Do remember that synthetic rubber is made of petroleum derivatives. What will happen in the long run if oil shoots up to $160 - $180 a barrel? Less growth for synthetic rubber as the economic value of selling general rubber goods is ou tweighed by the cost component of producing SR. Naturally, NR will pick up the slack.
Source: Company
Competitive Advantage
7 More than ninety years of experience in the research and development of rubber plantation Has about 30,000 ha of reserve land Young age profile plantation entering peak period Diversified plantation profile; multiplier effect Products produced by J.A. Wattie has met both national and international standard
2006
2007
2008
4,036 4,477 8,001 27,526
2009
30,355 6,005 8,485 18,022
2010
19,762 6,952 8,392 29,442
CAGR
121%
1H 11
11,700 7,860
CPO Sales CPO ASP Rubber 6,410 7,605 Sales Rubber 19,545 17,655 ASP Source: Company
7%
5,100 44,000
As you can see from table above, there was a spike in both CPO and rubber prices in 2010. Although sales in CPO decreased significantly in the year of 2010 due to decline on third party purchase, price appreciation in both commodities helped provide a floor for JAWAs revenue. Sales volume for rubber also decreased a mere 1.1% Year on Year (YoY), however average selling price for rubber jumped 63.4% to Rp.29,442/kg. The great news is sales volume for both CPO and rubber in 1H 11 respectively represented 59.2% and 60.8% of FY 2010 sales. Remember the favorite multiplier effect that I had mentioned, price x volume. We are going to see the wonders of multiplier effect in the year of 2011 as average selling price for both CPO and rubber increased significantly ; 13.1% and 49.4% respectively.
tons 8000
6000 4000 2000
2008
2009
2010
1H 2011
2009
2010
1H 2011
Production
Sales
Production
Sales
Rubber
10,000
8,000
6,000 4,000
2,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 1H 2011
Production
Sales
Source: Company 8
72%, 11,321 Ha
67%; 12,608 Ha
Immature
Young
Peak
Immature
Young
Peak
53%; 5,004 Ha
Young
Peak
Mature
Assuming a 3.8% and 4.1% new planting of total area planted annually for 2011 2015, we have come to the above age profile for both palm and rubber plantation under J.A. Wattie. We would like to remind you that commodity companies are price-taker meaning that they are not like Gudang Garam and or Indofood where they can set a price for the products that they sell (read: pricing power). In other words their revenue are pretty much correlated to the volatility of commodities benchmark price; in our case CPO price in Rotterdam index and for rubber price are RSS(Ribbed Smoke Sheet) 3 and TSR (Technically Specified Rubber) 20 in Singapore Commodity Exchange. Thus, any companies entering their peak period where growth is supported by production volume is good in our view. Volume will help offset any effects from the drop in commodities price.
Plantation Classification
Area in hectares Cultivation Right & Location Permits Planted: - Matured - Immature Total Planted Unplanted Others Rubber 32,435.46 4,511.81 4,943.56 9,455.37 21,730.93 1,249.16 Oil Palm 35,125.51 5,828.00 14,260.37 20,088.37 13,378.41 1,658.73 Coffee 554.59 531.02 5.00 536.02 18.57 Tea 504.30 504.30 504.30 Total 68,619.86 11,375.13 19,208.93 30,584.06 35,109.34 2,926.46
Source: Company; based on core and plasma plantations as of June 30, 2011
Financial Overview 1H 11
Rp Bn
Revenue
CAGR 2007 - 2010 = 35.3%
413.4 369.7 301.5
333.8
As
167.1
202.3
2007
Source: Company
2008
2009
2010
1H 10
1H 11
we can see in the bar chart beside us, revenue 1H 11 represents 80.8% of total revenue in FY 2010. Again this is because of the jump in both commodities prices and increased production volume compared to 2010.
Rp Bn
120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0
JAWA
Net Income recorded a whooping 98.7% compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) over the period 2007 2010.
33.8%
115.8 1H 11
20.0 -
43.5 2009
30.0% 25.0%
Net income
Source: Company
Gross Margin
Rp Bn 120.0
90.0
50.0%
36.1% 30.7%
24.7%
38.9%
40.0% 22.3%
10.2 27.8 43.5 80.1 52.3 115.8 20.0%
60.0
30.0 -
30.0%
2007
2008
2009
2010
1H 10
1H 11
Net income
Source: Company
Operating Margin
10
cost structure in rubber plantation is actually labor. Rubber is very labor intensive, from the get-go (nursery) until the tapping process, its hard to mechanize any of the process. However rubber trees are more durable than palm, meaning that they dont require as much fertilizing.
Source: Company
For
22% 25%
Palm, the cost structure is pretty much even out. In a more mature plantation, cost structure will lean on fertilizing being the biggest part of the pie. Its easier to mechanize some of the harvesting process.
Source: Company
In the worst case scenario where rubber price goes back to below $1/kg, per management, they can cut back on the fe rtilizer and it wont hurt the trees much. In fact they wont tap the rubber trees if rubber price are very much in the bottom. The difference in palm trees and rubber trees are their preservation practices: 1With rubber you can hold back on fertilizing and less fertilizing wont hurt the trees much. With palm trees, less fertilizing means more diseases and unhealthy trees. 2With rubber, you can delay harvesting, in fact the longer you wait until you harvest the better the quality. In this case, rubber is very much like wine, as they aged inside the trees, they get better. Its the opposite with palm fruits, when harvesting time come, you have to hack them off or they will rot and give diseases to the trees. The need for speedy handling process in which after palm fruits are harvested also serves as a hindrance to steal them. However the opposite applies on rubber, its very easy to steal the latex off the trees. I assume this is why the overhead and labor cost structures are higher on the rubber side of the business. However security measures can be provided in terms of securing the perimeter of the plantation by building moats around the area. 11
6.0%
33.2%
0%
2008 Rubber CPO
Source: Company
There may be some concerns that J.A Wattie is too diversified a plantation and some believe diversification for some company is deworseification. That might be true if revenue contribution by crop other than palm and rubber is more than 5%. However that is not the case as you can see from the chart above specifying JAWAs revenue breakdown from year 2008 to 2010. In fact there might be a hedge element in the case when crude oil price fell and dragged down the price of rubber, considering our belief that palm oil price is more stable than rubber price. Furthermore as you can see, J.A. Wattie is concentrating more and more to their two main products which is: rubber and palm oil. Other than the hedge element, there is that multiplier effect in the case where economy is doing great, driving up the prices of both commodities and J.A. Wattie will benefit from the two crops price hike.
COMPANY PROFILE
PT Jaya Agra Wattie is a publicly listed agribusiness corporation engaging in plantation, processing and agricultural logistics and marketing activities. Having 90 years of experience in the agricultural sector, the company continually strengthens its business base through a diversification approach by cultivating various premium plantations of primary raw commodities such as rubber, crude palm oil (CPO), coffee and tea.
12
Rubber Price (Rp/Kg) 40,664 37,536 34,408 31,280 28,152 25,024 21,896
Key Assumptions
Y/E December CPO Prices (benchmark) FFB Yield Rubber Prices (benchmark) Rubber Yield 2009 6,694 64,395 19,424 6,444 2010 7,804 67,897 32,144 6,325 2011F 7,981 93,920 38,887 6,599 2012F 8,140 134,854 31,280 7,337 2013F 8,303 187,383 29,802 8,681
Peer Comparisons
Ticker Market Cap JAWA 1,415,507 LSIP 14,839,730 SGRO 5,622,750 BWPT 4,925,242 GZCO 1,500,000 TBLA 2,940,101 Average 9,052,590 Source: Bloomber, eTrading EPS 12F 53 232.62 315.91 102.25 37.56 113.89 PE 12F 7.08 9.24 9.34 11.64 7.85 5.44 8.43 ROE 26.29% 24.70% 23.18% 23.95% 14.35% 23.12% 23.66% ROA 8.57% 19.86% 17.58% 11.39% 7.87% 7.66% 13.94% EV/EBITDA 6.82 5.98 4.73 10.48 9.11 4.95 7.13
Our View
We are bullish on rubber and CPO, the two main crops grow by JAWA. Its simple really: demand will outpace supply in the long run. Deficit will drive up price. Another key point is JAWA had their foot wet already by owning quite a large area of rubber plantation when rubber price hit their peak this year. Bluntly speaking, they didnt miss the boat like some others did. Thus based on their growth profile and rubber concentrated plantation, providing a double multiplier effect during the commodities price hike, we call JAWA a Buy with target price Rp.600; a 48.1% upside from current price. Valuation is based on DCF calculation with 10.56% WACC, 3% terminal growth, and discount factor of 30% due to the ill iquidity of the stock. Company fair value of RP.600 per share will reflect PE12F of 14.8.
13
Company Update
[Type sideba r content. A sideba r is a s tandalone supplement to the main document. It is often aligned on the left or ri ght of the page, or loca ted a t the top or bottom. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the sidebar text box. Type sideba r content. A sideba r is a sta ndalone supplement to the main document. It is often aligned on the left or ri ght of the page, or located a t the top or bottom. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the sidebar text box.]
14
Disclaimer: This report is prepared strictly for private circulation only to clients of PT eTrading Securities. It is purposed only to person having professional experience in matters relating to investments. The information contained in this report has been taken from sources which we deem reliable. No warranty (expres s or implied) is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute our judgments as of this date, without regards to its fairness, and are s ubject to change without notice. However, none of PT eTrading Securities (eTS) and/or its affiliated companies and/or their respective employees and/or agents makes any representation or warranty (express or implied) or accepts any responsibility or liability as to, or in relation to, the accuracy or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this report or as to any information contained in this report or any other such information or opinions remaining unchanged after the issue ther eof. W e expressly disclaim any responsibility or liability (express or implied) of eTS, its affiliated companies and their respective emp loyees and agents whatsoever and howsoever arising (including, without limitation for any claims, proceedings, action, suits, losses, expenses, damages or costs) which may be brought against or suffered by a ny person as a results of acting in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this report and neither eTS, its affiliated companies or their respective employees or a gents accepts liability for any errors, omissions or misstatements, negligent or other wise, in the report and any liability in respect of the repor t or any inaccuracy therein or omission there from which might otherwise arise is hereby expresses disclaimed. This document is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities. This firms and its affiliates and their officers and employees may have a position, make markets, act as principal or engage in transaction in securities or related investments of any company mentioned herein, may perform services for or solicit business from any company mentioned herein, and may have acted upon or used any of the recommendations herein before they have been provided to you. PT eTrading Securities 2 011.
15