Eurocdigo 8

Disposiciones para el proyecto de estructuras sismorresistentes

Parte 1-1: Reglas generales, acciones ssmicas y requisitos generales de las estructuras
UNE-ENV 1998-1-1 Marzo 1998 AENOR Asociacin Espaola de Normalizacin y Certificacin

4.2.2 Espectro elstico de respuesta El espectro elstico de respuesta ( )para el periodo de retorno de referencia se define por las siguientes expresiones:

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

)]

(4.1) (4.2)

[ ] [ ] [ ]

(4.3) (4.4)

( )

es la ordenada del espectro elstico de respuesta; es el perodo de vibracin de un sistema lineal con un grado de libertad; es la aceleracin de clculo del terreno, para el perodo de retorno de referencia; es el parmetro del suelo; es el factor de correccin del amortiguamiento, con valor de referencia para un amortiguamiento viscoso del 5%. Se determina por la expresin: ;

es el factor de amplificacin de la aceleracin espectral para un amortiguamiento viscoso del 5%;

son los lmites del tramo de aceleracin espectral constante; es el valor que define el comienzo del tramo de desplazamiento constante del espectro; son los exponentes que definen la forma del espectro para un perodo de vibracin mayor de y , respectivamente;

Tabla 1 Valores de los parmetros que describen el espectro elstico de respuesta

Clases de subsuelo A B C

S 1.0 1.0 0.9

0 2.5 2.5 2.5

k1 1.0 1.0 1.0

k2 2.0 2.0 2.0

TB(s) 0.10 0.15 0.20

TC(s) 0.40 0.60 0.80

TD(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0

Eurocode 8
Design of structures for earthquake resistance
Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings
EN 1998-1

3.2.2.2 Horizontal elastic response spectrum For the horizontal components of the seismic action, the elastic response spectrum, ( ), is defined by the following expressions: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ] [ ] [ ( )] (3.2) (3.3) (3.4) (3.5)

( )

is the elastic response spectrum; is the vibration period of a linear single-degree-of-freedom system; is the design ground acceleration on type A ground ( is the soil factor; is the damping correction factor with a reference value of viscous damping. It may be determined by: ; for 5% );

is the lower limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration branch; is the upper limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration branch; is the value defining the beginning of the constant displacement response range of the spectrum;

The use of two types of spectra is recommended: Type 1 and Type 2. If the earthquake that contribute most to the seismic hazard assessment have a surface-wave magnitude, , not greater than 5.5, it is recommended that the Type 2 spectrum is adopted.
Tabla 2 Values of the parameters describing the recommended Type 1 elastic response spectra

Ground type S TB(s) TC(s) TD(s) A 1.0 0.15 0.4 2.0 B 1.2 0.15 0.5 2.0 C 1.15 0.20 0.6 2.0 D 1.35 0.20 0.8 2.0 E 1.4 0.15 0.5 2.0

Tabla 3 Values of the parameters describing the recommended Type 2 elastic response spectra

Ground type S TB(s) TC(s) TD(s) A 1.0 0.05 0.25 1.2 B 1.35 0.05 0.25 1.2 C 1.5 0.10 0.25 1.2 D 1.8 0.10 0.30 1.2 E 1.6 0.05 0.25 1.2

Risk-UE
An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns
WP4: Vulnerability of current buildings
EVK4-CT-2000-00014 September 2003

3.5.2 Elastic Demand Spectrum, RISK-UE approach

Over the period range of interest for building damage/loss assessments a model and procedure for calculating 5 percent-damped demand spectra is developed by UNIGE (Lagomarsino et. al., 2002).

( ( ( ) ( ) { ( )

( )
( ( ) )

) (

) ) (3.11)

is the ordinate of the elastic response spectrum; is the vibration period of a linear single-degree-of-freedom system; is the peak ground acceleration; is the soil factor; is the factor defined as ( ) ;

is an initial and final period of each period range; is a corner period at the beginning of constant velocity region; is a corner period at the beginning of constant displacement region; The advantage of such formulation (Eq. 3-11) is that within the acceleration region ( ) the acceleration is not necessarily constant and may be varied linearly between one or more arbitrary defined points (Fig. 3.4-1). The model in itself assures for flexibility in modeling spectral shapes predominated by intermediate and longer period content. For predefined corner periods and , and arbitrary period selected to comply with the corner period of acceleration region ( ), Irizarry et al., 2003 tested the constant acceleration fitting reliability of Lagomarsino et. al.

2003 formulation for Barcelona soil conditions. Results compared to those derived by simplified Eurocode 8 formulation encountered lower RMS and percentage error.
ICC Hace falta encontrar: Irizarry J., Goula X. y Susagna, T. (2003). Analytical formulation for the elastic accelerationdisplacement response spectra adapted to Barcelona soil conditions. Technical Report, Instituto Cartogrfico de Catalua, Barcelona. Lagomarsino, S. y Penna, A. (2003). Guidelines for the implementation of the II level vulnerability methodology. An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns (RISK-UE) En la tesis de Bonett: Captulo 10