Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Nike, Inc. v.

“Just Did It” Enterprises


Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
6 F.3d 1225 (7th Cir. 1993)

Key Search Terms: trademark, infringement, parody, symbol, NIKE

Facts
Mike Stanard, defendant and owner/creator of “Just Did It” Enterprises, sells
t-shirts, shorts, and sweatshirts with the name “Mike” and a swoosh logo born
on the clothing. Stanard made “Mike” as a take-off parody of Nike selling his
apparel to the public as well as sending brochures to college athletes and
celebrities named Mike. Nike and the swoosh design is a registered trademark
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. “Just Do It” on the other hand, is
not a registered trademark but because of its inherent distinctiveness it is
entitled to trademark protection under the common law. Nike has brought suit
against Stanard for trademark infringement.

Issue
Would Stanard’s swoosh and logo of “Mike” would be likely to confuse
customers into buying the products with the belief that they were Nike brand
and thus violated Nike’s trademark?

Holding
The Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded the District Court’s finding of
summary judgment for Nike for further proceedings because of a factual
dispute regarding the likelihood of the Mike trademark confusing customers.
The Seventh Circuit discussed numerous factors to aid its decision including:
similarity of trademarks, similarity of products and uses, marketing channels,
consumer care, trademark strength, actual confusion, intent of parodists, and
other trademark cases. Based on the foregoing analysis and the finding that
potential confusion could be established when all of the facts are presented to
the jury, the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Summarized by: Erika Nelson

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi