IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No.

: 3AN-12- 09961 CI PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ) ) Supreme Court No.:S-14936 BARACK OBAMA and MITT ROMNEY, ) ) Respondents ) ) ) THOMAS A. LAMB
NOTICE TO THE COURT The Petitioner Thomas A. Lamb files this notice to the court to inform this Court that the Petitioner is waiting on a response from the Respondents before filing an amended complaint. Since the election will take place November 6th, 2012, it is the intent of the Petitioner to file an amended complaint under Article 1 of the federal constitution. It is the intent of the Petitioner to seek a congressional inquiry based on the disclosure of the Respondents records through a court order. Dated this_5st_ day of November, 2012 ____________________ Thomas A. Lamb

cc: Judge Pfiffner Trial Court Clerk/Anchorage

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No.: 3AN-12- 09961 CI PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ) ) Supreme Court No.:S-14936 BARACK OBAMA and MITT ROMNEY, ) ) Respondents ) ) ) THOMAS A. LAMB

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE TO THE COURT

The Petitioner Thomas A. Lamb files this memorandum in support of his Notice to the Court. With the election occurring on November 6th 2012, and Respondents have until 11/12/12 to respond to the Trial Court Interlocutory Order dated 10/31/12, the Petitioner will examine which issues are rendered moot with the passing of the November 6th election. If Respondent Mitt Romney is elected, the probability that he will run for office in 2016 is high and the same issues brought forth by the Petitioner in the lower court would resurface. 1 Moreover, it is the intent of the Petitioner to seek a congressional inquiry and as such has a cognizable interest in the outcome of a decision in the lower court even with the passage of the November 6th, 2012 election. 2 In cases where a congressional inquiry is being made by a person other than by the individual whose records are to be disclosed, the person who is making the congressional inquiry must have written consent of the individual whose records are being disclosed. 3
1

Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 333 n.2 (1972) (quoting Moore v. Ogilivie, 394 U.S. 814, 816 (1969) 2 Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969): see also Alaska Center for Environment v. U.S. Forest Service, 189 F.3d 851, 854 (9th Cir. 1999)

The Petitioner has already sought the disclosure of records through a demand letter and the Respondents did not respond. 4 The Petitioner now waits for the Respondents to respond to this court and the lower court. Dated this_5st_ day of November, 2012 ____________________ Thomas A. Lamb

cc: Judge Pfiffner Trial Court Clerk/Anchorage

3 4

See http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/lynn1975.pdf See paragraph 2 at http://www.scribd.com/doc/110730616/Lamb-v-ObamaRomney