+234-703-430-2486

The Agape Constant, F

By Peter Anyebe View my profile

AGAPE CONSULTANTS
WordPress

Google Me

Toward a Mathematical Model of Humans

24th August, 2012

+234-703-430-2486
WordPress

The Agape Constant, F

By Peter Anyebe

Physics has accumulated quite a number of constants, and there are many physical constants in science. Some of the most widely recognized include as follows: The speed of light in vacuum c, 299 792 458 ms1 The gravitational constant G, 6.67384(80)1011 m3kg1s2 Planck's constant h, 6.626 069 57(29) 1034 Js The electric constant 0, 8.854 187 817... 1012 Fm1 and The elementary charge e. 1.602 176 565(35) 1019 C A physical constant is a physical quantity that is generally believed to be both universal in nature and constant in time. It is contrasted with a mathematical constant, which is a fixed numerical value, but does not directly involve any physical measurement. Physical constants can take many dimensional forms. For instance the speed of light signifies a maximum speed limit of the Universe and is expressed dimensionally as length divided by time. But the fine-structure constant , 7.297 352 5698[24] e-3 which characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction, is dimensionless. Whereas the physical quantity indicated by any physical constant does not depend on the unit system used to express the quantity, the numerical values of dimensional physical constants do depend on the unit used. Therefore, a numerical value such as 299,792,458 for the constant speed of light c is expressed in units of meters per second, and is not a value that a theory of physics can be expected to predict. However, the ratios of like-dimensioned physical constants do not depend on unit systems in this way because their units cancel, so they are pure dimensionless numbers whose values a future theory of physics could conceivably hope to predict. Thus, theoretical physicists tend to regard these dimensionless quantities as fundamental physical constants. It is known that the Universe would be very different, if these constants took values significantly different from those we observe. For example, a change of a few percent in the value of the fine structure constant would be enough to eliminate stars like our Sun.

Some physicists have explored the notion that if the dimensionless physical constants had sufficiently different values, our Universe would be so radically different that intelligent life would probably not have emerged, and that our Universe therefore seems to be fine-tuned for intelligent life. The anthropic principle states a logical truism that the fact of our existence as intelligent beings who can measure physical constants requires those constants to be such that beings like us can exist. Recall Barrow, 2002 as follows: An important lesson we learn from the way that pure numbers like define the world is what it really means for worlds to be different. The pure number we call the fine structure constant and denote by is a combination of the electron charge, e the speed of light, c and Planck's constant, h. At first we might be tempted to think that a world in which the speed of light was slower would be a different world. But this would be a mistake. If c, h, and e were all changed so that the values they have in metric (or any other) units were different when we looked them up in our tables of physical constants, but the value of remained the same, this new world would be observationally indistinguishable from our World. The only things that count in the definition of worlds are the values of the dimensionless constants of Nature. If all masses were doubled in value you cannot tell, because all the pure numbers defined by the ratios of any pair of masses are unchanged. The agape constant, F is a factor of human intellect, and it is dimensionless. It is derived from the ratio of the mental capacity for analysis, F1 on the equivalent capacity for synthesis, F2. Given a phenomenon therefore, is the person able to reduce it into the essentials that give it being? And then to put the items back together, so that they make meaning and sense? This measure has been predicted from the ratio of rationality, Rn on the standard procedure index, n. Rn is the capacity to reduce phenomena into the five, 5 essential components, as required by the perception model of mind, PMM (analysis?). And n measures the performance at task by the standard procedure (synthesis?). The standard procedure series, SPS is a format for presenting information meaningfully in six, 6 pieces of data, so that phenomena are at once described and procedurised. Consider the following thesis: Every human is a person, F Every person has a value, X View my profile

Google Me

In this case the value, X measures the capacity to turn what is known, into what is done. This is the capacity to convert knowledge into action. But action is a function of the following two, 2 factors: Morals, and Ethics While morals are phenomenological, ethics are behavioural. The phenomenological connects knowledge to actions. This characterises people at once, as both intangible and tangible respectively. The tangible behavioural component of the person has long been subjected to scrutiny by psychology. Phenomenology has however defied analysis so far, for reasons of inappropriate measurement techniques. This has awaited the formulation of the correct link that describes the interface between the human and the physical world. The link involves a clear and consistent definition of the energy transfer between the two, 2 worlds. The energy that converts knowledge into action is derived from the inanimate. Following the argument of a world that is self contained, energy would neither be created nor destroyed. It is merely recycled, being converted from one form into another. This definition does not negate creation. Rather, it justifies the assertion that the wave model defines the human-physical interface. The model unites people with the physical, ascribing the same fundaments to both. When people are able to perceive the inner nature of phenomena therefore, it would only be an expression of who they are. The person merely transfers their nature on phenomena, when they describe people, places, and things. People project themselves on phenomena, so that when they describe to characterise, it is actually their own characters that is expressed. When people put a value on phenomena, it is in reality, a manifestation of their individual value. By implication, people portray who they are uniquely, when they present their perspectives of phenomena. It is this perspective that is evaluated against the standard procedure series, SPS on the F-Scale. The SPS is a unit procedure that is iterated as many times as is required, to accomplish a task. This makes it self contained, like the physical world. In principle, when the standard procedure is designed correctly, it continues to run, ad infinitum. Following Einsteins energy equation, e = mc2, energy is released by fission, when mass is split. And by a rule in algebra, when a number is split in two, 2, the multiple

of the pair is largest when they are equal. This is a reference to symmetry, as expressed in the normal curve. A perspective of phenomena is symmetrical when it approximates the duality series in operations research exactly. This series comprises four, 4 items as follows: Maxima, Impulse (L, E) Minimax, Nature (S, E) Maximin, Nurture (L, M) Minima, Sustenance (S, M) The two, 2 inner items ought to be equal, for maximin = minimax, even when they start out being different. In a typical perspective of phenomena the maximin describes the minimum requirement for the phenomenon to exist. And the minimax identifies the upper limit, beyond which optimisation would be ineffectual. These describe the nurture and nature items respectively. They are developmental, defining the phenomenons limits of existence. In our world, life starts out fragile, and has to be nurtured into maturity, which would be its real nature. The two, 2 end items are supposed to be inverses. They describe the growth process that traverses the chasm or gap, to link the two, 2 inner items. The top item or maxima describes the impulse element that determines the rate of growth. And the lower item or minima, identifies the sustenance of the process. For both pairs of items, one of them represents the location, L property of the phenomenon; and the other, its size, S to portray the wave nature. The ratio of the location items on the size items predicts the factor-F. The ratios of both Ls and Ss are first derived, to make the prediction from single factors of L and S. Then the factor-F is clearly dimensionless, possessing the potential to change the way the world looks. In this case however, it is not the physical world that is altered, but the society, community, or group to which the person belongs. This factor is actually a measure of the amount of entropy or chaos that a person contributes to the environment. Its limit is determined by the entropy contribution associated with the second law of thermodynamics. Beyond thermodynamic decay, entropy is inimical. Measurement on the F-Scale is done in faith dimensions, F-d. It quantifies trust or dependability, as the extent to which a person can be depended upon to deliver, according to specification. It is best at a unity, for F = 1. It drops as the scores increase as integers or decrease as fractions from a unity; as does dependability. .

For application, recall that the F-Score is derived in two, 2 different ways. It is derived on the PMM as a moral factor. In this case, the input to the measurement is the f0-score, which is derived on the f-scale. Then the following dictum applies: If it is right, Then it is good It is right when the F-Score is a unity. Then goodness depreciates with the observed deviance. Every time the F-Score is evaluated from the f0-score, it is a measure of morals. However, when it is evaluated from the factors Rn and n, it measures ethical standards. This measure is input to the need profile, which evaluates the factor-Po. This factor is a measure of how much power, Po is stored in the personality, P for the response, R to stimuli, S. It is basis for the objective classification of people into the following categories: Integration, Po 0.98 for Nu 4 Adjustment, 0.88 < Po < 0.98 for 2 < Nu < 4 Adaptation, 0.73< Po < 0.88 for 1< Nu < 2 The facto-Nu measures the number of essentials that a person is able to identify. It is derived from the factor-Po. Below a score of 0.73, for Po < 0.73, the person would be unfit for recommendations. This would fall below the acceptable minimum human limit. This is when the person is not able to identify even a single of the five, 5 essentials. The factor-S is a measure of soul, S that derives from the factor-f0. Just like the factor-Po has ethical implications, this factor has moral connotations. The soul is the store house of all the energy that is available to a person for use. It is a mass that is accumulated as people act. The energy that drives actions is therefore acquired according to the persons moral standing. Notice the seeming contradiction! Behaviour is linked to ethics, and knowledge to morals. But Soul, which derives from actions and is behavioural, is linked to morals. While power, Po which is ethical becomes linked with knowledge, with its base in morals. In reality, this is not a contradiction. Rather, it defines a cycle that establishes the fact of self containment in the personality. In principle, this cycle begins with the moral, as represented by the factor- f0. The factor- f0 is actually a measure of the approximation of the natural order, N-O, outlined here in the duality series.

The f0-score translates into the factor-F or personality, F when it is passed through the PMM. The factor-F is then passed through the need profile to define the power, Po stored in the personality, for responses to stimuli. It is these responses that cumulate to define soul, the source of energy for the thought process, f0. Serially: 1. 2. 3. 4. Po, (L, E) F, (S, E) f0, (L, M) S, (S, M) Morality 6. Goodness 5. Righteousness

The Ethics Series: f0 F Po S f0 In reality however, which is demonstrated on the sigmoid curve, S-Curve humans start put as persons, F at birth. But they descend into the abyss of objectivity, f0 where they exchange the personal order, P-O for the natural order, N-O. It is in this process that the power, Po for building the soul, S is acquired.

Given morals, f0 therefore the ethical, F is determined. While the factor-f0 defines the location attribute, the factor-F represents the size property of the personality function. This is repeated with the factors Po and S in a reversed mirror image. Po is ethical, but defines the location attribute. And S is a size property that is moral. In predicting the factor-F on this series therefore, the ratio of the locational attributes on the size properties is evaluated. But these ratios derive from another ratio. The mantissa of the location properties, L is derived from the ratio of Po on f0. This is the same as the ratio of the ethical, E on the moral, M which is actually a reversal. F and S also define the denominator of the size properties in reverse order, as the ratio of ethics on morals; rather than morals on ethics, representing the given and the determined respectively.

Notice that in predicting the factor-F, it is actually the persons level of internal consistency that is measured. This quantifies reliability, and therefore trust and dependability, according to how right people are in their analysis of phenomena. To make analysis, a minimum of reason ie required. This optimises into rationality, at the upper limit. The gap between these is traversed according to the sophistication of the persons thought process. This is the impulse that turns reason into rationality; the moral into the ethical, and the location attribute into the size property. This makes thought at once ethical and locational. It is behavioural in character, but functionally, it determines how the mind works. Serially: 3. 2. 1. 4. Thought, (L, E) Rationality, (S, E) Reason, (L, M) Mind, (S, M) Personality (Constant) 6. Body, 21 5. Spirit, 19

The Soul Series Reason, rationality, thought, and mind are requirements for the human person to make objective analysis of phenomena. From the above series, these requirements can be attained because of how people are constituted. Humans have bodies that enable them to function adequately in the physical world. The five, 5 senses make communication possible with the physical environment. Then a person would be as good as dead, when the senses are out of order. People with such conditions have been referred to as vegetables. This appears to be a reference to the fact that plants cannot reason. They dont have the minimum requirement to be grouped as humans. Humans also have spirit. It is the domain of morals and ethics. Spirit is housed in the body. And it moves the body, via the mind. The mind is the abode for reason, thought, or rationality. It is the interface between spirit and body. When the mind functions optimally therefore, reason, thought, and rationality are at their best. Then morals and ethics would be appropriate. And this would translate into actions that are good, being the right responses to stimuli. This maintains harmony in the environment, and the body is physically healthy. Thus, the first, 1st four, 4 factors on the soul series define requirements that need to be satisfied, for these expectations of the body and spirit to be attained. This is

confirmed in another measure of internal consistency. In this case, the body is a function of the two, 2 growth factors, including reason and rationality. And the spirit is a function of the two, 2 development factors that include thought and mind. When the personality is conceptualised as a projection of the mind, the growth factors define the emotion, L; the development factor define the intellect, F; and the body and spirit define the will, A. Then the factor-A is predicted from the factors L and F, according to the following relation: A = LF2 The factors L, F, and A are first evaluated as relativity averages as follows: L = (Reason x Rationality) F = (Thought x Mind) A = (Body x Spirit) Recall that by Platonian duality, physical appearances are mere shadows of reality. Then reality would be perceived appropriately only when the essentials are identified. This represents the inner nature of the phenomenon, which determines its existence and being. Then the people who are able to identify essentials have also found the essential elements of their own being and the basis for their existence, which they project on phenomena. They have made the descent from F into the abyss of f0. They have traded off the personal order, P-O for the natural order, NO. They have shifted from the concern with appearances, to the perception of essentials. Following Gary Zukav in 1989, they have adopted the multi-dimensional for the five, 5 dimensional thought pattern. It is only such people that can be expected to be internally consistent. This translates into appropriate action, and the capacity to deliver according to specifications. They belong in the team of 20%ters, who do 80% of the work in most organisations. Following from the above, the assertions presented below would make sense: The personality, F is a constant, according to the capacities with which it is endowed, as outlined on the soul series above. But the value, X of the person varies, as the capacities are optimised. The goal of socialisation and upbringing would therefore be for the value, X to

approximate the person, F exactly, for X = F. This is achieved in cultures, which would have to be optimised and made equal to this task. The whole history of humanity, and the world, centres on the evolution of the appropriate culture. Humanity has journeyed far into this epoch. See the chart below:

A Unitary History of Humanity Moreover, in the same way that reason distinguishes between plant and human life, rationality also defines the limit of animal life. Animals may learn sophisticated tricks, as evident in circus shows, but humans have to derive the procedure that is learned. If reason is necessary for learning, then rationality is, for procedurisation.