Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
11/13/12
11/13/12
A
Shared
Responsibility
Government Road Users Road Authorities
Police
NGOs
Emergency Services
Vehicle Industry
Schools
Page 6
Private Companies
Media
11/13/12
Environment is reviewed from the end users perspec*ve Design end users are vulnerable people on foot or on a bike! Considers links and interchanges to other transport modes, such as bus and rail
Links
Crossings
Routes
Interchange space
Public spaces
11/13/12
Problems: very long crossing wide turning circle allows vehicles to turn at high speed not at grade
11/13/12
Improvements: Footway build outs reduce crossing length Tighter corners reduce vehicle speed Raised table design- now at grade
11/13/12
Page 13
Page 14
11/13/12
Ratemystreet.co.uk
Page 16
11/13/12
Page 18
11/13/12
Reducing Injuries
Page 19
60.65 ms 115.65 ms
35
Minimum
30
25
20
15
10
-5 -20 0 20 40 60
Filtered at CFC_60
Processed on 21/05/2012
80
100
120
140
Sled Acceleration
Time - ms
Test Speed
Frontal Impact: 50 km/h Rear Impact: 30 km/h Horizontal: 550 mm Ver\cal: 800mm (840mm for P10)
10
11/13/12
Dierence?
Page 21
Page 22
11
11/13/12
Check
it
ts
TRL
have
conducted
a
public
campaign
in
the
UK
called
Check
it
ts
to
check
how
the
public
are
using
CRS.
10%
were
found
not
to
be
appropriate
i.e.
child
too
big
or
too
heavy
9%
were
not
compa\ble
with
the
vehicle
27%
had
some
sort
of
misuse
rela\ng
to
the
installa\on
of
the
child
into
the
child
seat
36%
had
some
sort
of
misuse
rela\ng
to
the
installa\on
of
the
child
restraint
in
the
vehicle
Page
23
Page 24
12
11/13/12
70s
80s
90s
00s
Present
Page 25
13
11/13/12
To summarise - we can con*nue to reduce fatali*es and serious injury to some of our most
Becer regula*on Developing crash t est technology Improving public understanding Tools e.g. hcp://www.grsproadsafety.org/ sites/grsp.drupalgardens.com/les/Seat
precious passengers.
%20belts%20%26%20child%20restraints.pdf
14
11/13/12
15
11/13/12
16