Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 31

Managing working capital Cash@Risk

Webinar October 23th, 2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Managing working capital: for better and for worse


Cash is back as King Focus shift from the P&L to Balance Sheet
Shareholder Value
P&L Balance sheet

When times are rough, companies must do everything they can to free up cash
Working Capital is one of the few remaining areas which can deliver significant cash to the business in a relatively short period of time without a large restructuring program Desk research shows that there is a significant potential of untapped capital lying idle up to 500 billion in European companies alone according to some estimates

Revenue Growth Operating Margin


Volume Price Realization Selling, General & Administrative Costs Cost of Goods Sold Income Taxes

Asset Efficiency

Expectations
Company Strengths External Factors

In an economy coming out of recession, financing the upturn also requires tight cash control
With inventories at bare minimum, companies are faced with the challenge of increasing output whilst keeping working capital under control
Accounts Payable

Property, Plant & Equipment (PP&E)

Inventory

Receivables & Payables

Working Capital

Inventory

Accounts Receivable

Definition of Working Capital: The excess of current assets over liabilities, comprising of accounts receivable, inventory minus accounts payable, represents the liquidity a business requires for day-to-day operations.
3
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Barriers for optimising Working Capital

Fear of jeopardising relationships and sales by too aggressively chasing customers for payment

Customer & Competition

Fear of a fall in customer service levels unless holding high levels of inventory Customers are given payment discounts even when not paying within terms Competition is giving longer payment terms Concern over the likely response of suppliers and risk to supply following a unilateral decision to extend payment terms Impact on the organisations reputation from negative publicity if extending payment times, particularly for smaller suppliers Individuals or organisational performance metrics do not reflect the importance of cash Unclear responsibility for working capital. It spans a number of functional areas no one individual can be given responsibility Are there benefits available? If we restrict liquidity we impact our ability to operate the business day-today Are the benefits sustainable? We manage working capital levels down at the end of a financial year but they soon rise again afterwards

Suppliers

Working Capital Improvement Opportunities

Control & Responsiblity

Benefits

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Managing working capital requires tight control over the cash conversion cycle through the effectiveness and efficiency of three integrated business processes
Receive Invoice Goods Received Days in raw materials inventory Days of WIP Days in finished goods inventory Days in transit

Cash Out ()

Cash Conversion Cycle


Place Invoice

Cash In ()

Purchase-to-Pay
Manage contracts
Raise requisition

Forecast-to-Fulfill
Source Maintain SC strategy Sell

Order-to-Cash
Manage contracts Receive order Handle returns Check credit
Apply terms & conditions

Manage product range

Handle returns Settle complaints Settle rebates Pay invoice


Check terms & conditions

Release order Receive goods Receive invoice Inspect goods Receive & store Ship Forecast demand Plan supply S&OP Plan production Schedule production Store Pick & release Produce Plan inventory

Settle complaints Settle rebates Collect payment Ship order

Place invoice

Pick & pack

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Polling question 1

Does your company have a working capital improvement initiative


1. 2. 3. 4. No, we dont have one and dont need one No, we dont have one but I think we could use one Yes, we have a working capital improvement initiative NA / Dont know

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Cash@Risk: Working capital reduction through data analysis

Our approach is about finding cash in a short time frame without putting significant efforts in process and system redesign. However, data analyses to recover or optimize cash in the short term may lead to insights to transform related processes in the longer term. Recovery: data analyses on inaccurate, incomplete or double transactions as well as non compliance with contractual terms. Optimization: strengthen customer payment terms & dunning process, considering cash discounts & analyze actual payment versus payment terms, analyze days of supply versus revenue Transformation: process, organization and system redesign

Impact
Transformation

Structural changes
Optimization

Recovery

Quick wins Time & efforts

Cash@Risk toolbox and examples of realised savings

Component Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory

Realised savings Up to 39% Up to 16% Up to 28%

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Focus on capturing A/P opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in Purchasing and P-t-P process

Decentralised purchasing means that purchasing power is not leveraged to improve terms and conditions

Buyers are processing low value, routine purchases instead of strategic work to enable negotiation of improved terms and conditions

No well-defined authorisation process exists to ensure conformance to agreed contracts and terms

Payment policies are not followed and payments are made early

Opportunities for delayed VAT or duty payments not identified or realised

Manage contracts & suppliers

Procure goods & services

Receive goods & services

Process accounts payable

Disburse supplier payment

Different terms with the same supplier across the organisation

Off-contract spend leads to unfavourable terms of business

Buyers focus on price and supplier proximity at the expense of payment terms

Receiving processes are not robust and as a consequence goods & services are paid for that may not have been received

Invoices vs. POs variance exceed policy tolerances but are still paid

Payment discounts are not taken when due

Recovery Optimization

Squeeze your suppliers but preserve supply chain integrity


Transformation

10

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts payable: Recovery


Opportunities to recover cash in a short time frame are identified by analyzing:
Double payments to suppliers Outstanding credit notes Duplicate payments across entities Incomplete deliveries Returned goods not credited Discounts / rebates not credited Payments in the wrong currency Unrecovered VAT Engagement examples
We used our Cash @ Risk tool to perform accounts payable testing at a company in the travel and leisure industry. We identified double payments, unprocessed discounts, payments in the wrong currency and unrecovered VAT. Further root cause analysis showed that manual interventions performed when the reservation system failed eventually lead to double payments when the reservation system rebooted. Our assistance with recovery and supplier negotiations resulted in a recovery of 2,4% of the total purchase amount. We performed a supplier review for a company in the chemical industry. Based on an analysis of the suppliers sales data, it was noted that the supplier had been selling to other customers at a price lower than the price contractually agreed with our client under a Most Favoured Nations (MFN) clause. Reasons given for these lower prices were exchange rate conversions, second-quality products and import taxes. Our assistance helped the company recover $13,5M of overpayments.

11

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts payable: Optimization


Opportunities to increase accounts payable in the medium term are identified by analyzing the A/P per supplier compared to its agreed payment terms.
Actions can be taken on: Payment quality & frequency Payment term negotiation Standards definition & enforcement Evaluation of cash discounts at early payment

Measure actual and best possible


33

Set realistic target


11.500 11.244 700

31

31

11.300

29
28 28 28 28 28

30

11.100

28
W/C ('000 EUR)

27

27

10.900

26

26

25

25
Days 24

26

10.700 250 10.500 100 10.300 50 200

23

23

23

24

22

21

21

21

22

22

22

22

20

19

20

10.100 9.944 9.900

17

9.700
15 Jan Feb Mar Apr Actual DPO May Jun Target DPO Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

9.500 Actual Average W/C Action 1 Potential Action 2 Potential Action 3 Potential Action 4 Potential Action 5 Potential Optimized Average W/C

Average Actual DPO

Average Target DPO

12

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts payable: Optimization (continued)

Take Action !
100 90 80
W/C Improvement ('000 EUR)

100 90 90 80 70 60 60 60 60 52 43 60 50 60 60 60 60 50 40 30 29 22 12
14 9 9 DSO (Days)

70 60 50 40 30 20 15 10
157 48 28

28

30 20 10

9 4
Supplier G0228 16

0
Supplier D0263 Supplier C8003 Supplier O0226 Supplier C0344 Supplier S0077 Supplier E0214 Supplier T0279 Supplier S0264 Supplier B0272

Potential WC

Actual DPO

Target DPO

13

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

14

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Focus on capturing A/R opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in customer service and O-t-C process
Pricing is conducted using a non-integrated database. The same customer is offered different terms by different parts of the organisation Claims for VAT on purchases made near the end of accounting period delayed until next period Order entry process not integrated with inventory or production leading to increased safety stock holdings Customers are given payment discounts even when not paying within terms No process owner resulting in a lack of collections focus

Credit limits are inappropriately overridden

Manual or redundant processing steps delay process

Numerous shipment / product disputes resulting in suspense receivables

Receive order or request for quote

Credit authorisation

Order entry

Ship & raise invoice

Payment receipt & cash application

Receivables management & collection

Incomplete order information causing errors later in the process

Customer payment history not visible leading to excessive credit limits

Entry errors cause disputes and drive additional cost and re-work in shipping, handling and returns processing

Shipping and invoicing systems are separate. Invoices are manually re-keyed in billing spreadsheet for distribution to customer delaying process

Collection representatives currently wait until payments are 30 days past due date to begin contacting customers

Unclear spilt of responsibiliti es between sales units and shared service operations

Recovery Optimization Transformation


15

Limited visibility / reporting to identify and focus on problem receivables. Not fully leveraging VAT relief opportunities

Push your customers fairly and intelligently

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts receivable: Recovery


Opportunities to recover revenue in a short time frame are identified by analyzing:
Completeness of invoicing Accuracy of invoicing Price changes not invoiced Unauthorized discounts Revenue leakage Unbalanced customer terms

Engagement examples
The CFO of a manufacturing company informed us that he was looking for a quick way to detect unrevealed cash. We used our Cash @ Risk tool to scan the receivables. The tool revealed that 0,95% of the production orders had not been invoiced and 0,25% of the invoices showed negative pricing differences with the master price table. Further investigation showed the presence of duplicate volume rebates due to system errors. Our assistance resulted in a net cash gain of 0,55% of the revenues.

16

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts receivable: Optimization


Opportunities to reduce accounts receivable in the medium term are identified by analyzing the A/R per customer compared to its agreed payment terms.
Actions can be taken on: Billing quality & frequency Dunning process Dispute Management Payment term negotiation Standards definition & enforcement Payment term rationalization Measure actual and best possible Set realistic target

18,000

11.500
16,522

16,000

11.300

11.244

700

14,093

14,000
13,500 12,713

11.100
13,894 13,744

11,966

11,875

12,118

12,000
'000 EURO

11,842
10,871

10.900

11,435

10,846

11,115

11,162

11,297

9,947

10,000

9,750

W/C ('000 EUR)

10,461

10.700 250 10.500


Focus Top Dunning Potential Customers

7,744

7,902

8,000

8,656

8,887

100
Faster Dunning Other Customers

10.300

6,191

5,673

6,151

6,000

50
Align Invoice Terms Renegotiate Terms Fast Payers

200

10.100 9.900

4,000

9.944
Renegotiate Terms Small Customers

2,000

9.700
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr Actual W/C May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

9.500 Actual Average W/C Action 1 Potential Action 2 Potential Action 3 Potential Action 4 Potential Action 5 Potential Optimized Average W/C

Best Possible W/C

Average Actual W/C

Average Best Possible W/C

17

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Accounts receivable: Optimization (continued)

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

DSO (Days)

18
W/C Improvement (GBP)

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

5.000

0 44 51
SLBM Systems 25.764

71

94

TB Davies (Cardiff) 23.948

74

84

Zap

21.694

46

55

SIG Trading

19.184

47 43

Travis PerkinsKeyline 19.052

64

82

Door Panels

18.644

46

59

Potential WC
Bailey Caravans 17.740

47

58

Take Action !

Actual DSO
Marine Harvest Ireland Tarmac Topfloor

13.688

53

68

11.852

46

55

Target DSO

Jackson Bldg Centres

11.700

50

64

Cordek

11.183

36

47

Daewoo Electronics UK

10.332

48

61

Walcon Marine

8.861

64

85

Norbrook Labs

8.587

46 42

Buildbase Limited

8.009

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Accounts receivable: Optimization - case


Per 2009 the accounts receivable at Company X amounted to 7,5M and had granted an annualized cash discounts of 1,8M. Our review has identified several areas to improve both working capital and the financial cost related to cash discounts. The current baseline is however not substantially deviating from the simulation taking into account the targeted payment term.
Impact Baseline Non-compliance to contractual payment terms: cash discounts taken > 3 days too late Renegotiation of 6 payment terms with a significant cost > the cost of Company X targeted payment term Result Accounts receivable 7.504.651 Cash discount 1.790.467 - 250.135 - 70.939

- 328.701

7.175.950

1.469.393

We would recommend to assess further targeted action to improve the working capital and the P&L: Unrightfully deducted cash discounts (payment date 3 days beyond contractual date) should not be accepted, or should be deducted from the year end discount ( 250.135); The review of 6 specific payment terms could further improve the cash position with 328.701, and could reduce the cash discounts with 70.939. In addition the company should consider rationalizing its current 54 payment terms, and consider increasing the dunning frequency.
19
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

20

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Focus on capturing inventory opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in Supply Chain and F-t-F process

Disconnect between forecasting process and Sales and Marketing drives need for additional stock holdings

External pressure to revise forecasts upward leads to inaccuracies

Unstable forecasted requirements & unresponsive suppliers lead to increased stock holdings requirements

Long lead-times result in the need for additional stock holdings to meet variations in customer demand

Multiple inventory locations leading to higher inventory levels, including hidden or off balance sheet inventory

Demand planning

Sales & operations planning

Inventory planning

Manufacturing

Fulfilment

Inventory level inaccuracy results in additional safety stock holding

Demand Planning department adds in gut feel safety stocks just in case

Limited analysis of supply chain performance and capabilities results in increased safety stock holding

Blanket stocking policies drive increases in items with differing demand and profitability characteristics

Stock silos reduces availability and results in double holding of inventory

Limited manufacturing changeover flexibility resulting in need for additional stock buffers

Recovery Optimization Transformation

Decrease your inventory structurally to still guarantee service levels

21

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Inventory: Recovery
Before any action can be taken to optimize inventory, the accuracy of the inventory levels should be properly controlled. Typical issues are:
Reported scrap BOM accuracy materials movement accuracy Reported obsolete stock Other Engagement examples
Deloitte was requested to optimize the inventory levels of a client. As a first step, the inventory accuracy was investigated based on defined KPIs. Only after improvement of these KPIs, the actual optimization was started.

22

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Inventory: Optimization
Opportunities to reduce inventory in a short time frame are identified by the following: Analyzing the weeks on hand versus the revenue generated per item Assessing against industry best practices and averages Providing insight in excess inventory against expectations
Inventory (excluding D-items)

29% 23%

49%

Number of items (excluding D-items)

16% 52%
Resulting in short term, quick win actions per SKU like: Production and or replenishment stop Increasing sales efforts and or price reductions Obsolescence review
23

32%

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Inventory: Optimization (continued)


Sample inventory optimization deliverable

20.000.000

Materials not in scope

Obsolete stock

Articles on reservation

Slow moving articles

Fast moving articles

500.000 3.900.000 1.000.000 3.400.000


10.000.000 Potential Amount to reduce: 8.800.000

3.000.000 750.000 1.000.000


Amount to keep: 9.400.000

4.400.000

Some conclusion from this stock analysis were: The stock in the central warehouse could be reduced with 8,8 million euro. The overstock was mainly due to historical orders An accurate stock policy should be developed for slow movers. The reorder points and order quantity were relatively well defined, but real inventory was higher than the calculated inventory level according to the defined reorder points.

24

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Polling question 2

Where do you believe the greatest improvements remain in working capital reduction?
1. 2. 3. 4. Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory NA / Dont know

25

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

26

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Working Capital opportunities are tackled by a variety of improvements on the three pillars leading to optimised asset efficiency
Receive Invoice Goods Received Days in raw materials inventory Days of WIP Days in finished goods inventory Days in transit

Cash Out ()

Reduce Gap
Place Invoice

Cash In ()

Days Payables Outstanding (DPO)


Recovery Optimise cash discounts against interest gains and ensure discounts /rebates etc are fully exploited Review payments database for possible duplicate payments, invoice errors, VAT under-claimed and liabilities etc. Review Invoices vs. POs variance and protest invoice when tolerance is exceeded Review procedures for timing of tax & duty payments and understand opportunities to defer payment Review the A/P per supplier with its agreed payment terms

Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO)


Analyse supply chain performance and capabilities to reduce safety stock holding. Review BOMs on their accuracy

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)


Optimise timing for recovery of VAT Track and manage adherence to current terms, including early payment discounts Analyse shipment/product disputes

Optimization

Review safety stock levels and re-order points across different product and customer segments Review policies for slow moving inventory. Set up disposal programmes for obsolete stock

Focus on order management process to ensure no barriers to timely payment contact customers directly when payments are due Eliminate manual or redundant processing steps

Transformation

Redefine purchasing power to improve negotiated terms and conditions Redefine authorizations within the organisation to ensure conformance to terms and conditions negotiated

Review production strategy and planning policies Revise planning processes and responsibilities to improve demand visibility and forecast accuracy Reduce the fragmentation of holding inventory

Align and optimise payment terms and conditions across territories and customers Integrate order entry processes with inventory or production leading to decrease safety stock holdings Align shipping and invoicing systems
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

27

Polling question 3

Was this webinar useful for you?


1. 2. 3. Yes No NA / Dont know

28

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contents

Introduction Working capital reduction


Recovery Optimization Transformation

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory Summary Contact details

29

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Contact details

Contact

Email

Direct phone

Mobile

Tom Van Cauwenberge

tvancauwenberge@deloitte.com

+32 2 800 22 79

+32 496 57 49 30

Wim Den Haese

wdenhaese@deloitte.com

+32 2 800 24 03

+32 476 49 66 24

Bjorn Borghs

bborghs@deloitte.com

+32 2 800 20 15

+32 475 75 42 86

Or your local Deloitte office

30

Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi