Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
When times are rough, companies must do everything they can to free up cash
Working Capital is one of the few remaining areas which can deliver significant cash to the business in a relatively short period of time without a large restructuring program Desk research shows that there is a significant potential of untapped capital lying idle up to 500 billion in European companies alone according to some estimates
Asset Efficiency
Expectations
Company Strengths External Factors
In an economy coming out of recession, financing the upturn also requires tight cash control
With inventories at bare minimum, companies are faced with the challenge of increasing output whilst keeping working capital under control
Accounts Payable
Inventory
Working Capital
Inventory
Accounts Receivable
Definition of Working Capital: The excess of current assets over liabilities, comprising of accounts receivable, inventory minus accounts payable, represents the liquidity a business requires for day-to-day operations.
3
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009
Fear of jeopardising relationships and sales by too aggressively chasing customers for payment
Fear of a fall in customer service levels unless holding high levels of inventory Customers are given payment discounts even when not paying within terms Competition is giving longer payment terms Concern over the likely response of suppliers and risk to supply following a unilateral decision to extend payment terms Impact on the organisations reputation from negative publicity if extending payment times, particularly for smaller suppliers Individuals or organisational performance metrics do not reflect the importance of cash Unclear responsibility for working capital. It spans a number of functional areas no one individual can be given responsibility Are there benefits available? If we restrict liquidity we impact our ability to operate the business day-today Are the benefits sustainable? We manage working capital levels down at the end of a financial year but they soon rise again afterwards
Suppliers
Benefits
Managing working capital requires tight control over the cash conversion cycle through the effectiveness and efficiency of three integrated business processes
Receive Invoice Goods Received Days in raw materials inventory Days of WIP Days in finished goods inventory Days in transit
Cash Out ()
Cash In ()
Purchase-to-Pay
Manage contracts
Raise requisition
Forecast-to-Fulfill
Source Maintain SC strategy Sell
Order-to-Cash
Manage contracts Receive order Handle returns Check credit
Apply terms & conditions
Release order Receive goods Receive invoice Inspect goods Receive & store Ship Forecast demand Plan supply S&OP Plan production Schedule production Store Pick & release Produce Plan inventory
Place invoice
Polling question 1
Our approach is about finding cash in a short time frame without putting significant efforts in process and system redesign. However, data analyses to recover or optimize cash in the short term may lead to insights to transform related processes in the longer term. Recovery: data analyses on inaccurate, incomplete or double transactions as well as non compliance with contractual terms. Optimization: strengthen customer payment terms & dunning process, considering cash discounts & analyze actual payment versus payment terms, analyze days of supply versus revenue Transformation: process, organization and system redesign
Impact
Transformation
Structural changes
Optimization
Recovery
Contents
Focus on capturing A/P opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in Purchasing and P-t-P process
Decentralised purchasing means that purchasing power is not leveraged to improve terms and conditions
Buyers are processing low value, routine purchases instead of strategic work to enable negotiation of improved terms and conditions
No well-defined authorisation process exists to ensure conformance to agreed contracts and terms
Payment policies are not followed and payments are made early
Buyers focus on price and supplier proximity at the expense of payment terms
Receiving processes are not robust and as a consequence goods & services are paid for that may not have been received
Invoices vs. POs variance exceed policy tolerances but are still paid
Recovery Optimization
10
11
31
31
11.300
29
28 28 28 28 28
30
11.100
28
W/C ('000 EUR)
27
27
10.900
26
26
25
25
Days 24
26
23
23
23
24
22
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
20
19
20
17
9.700
15 Jan Feb Mar Apr Actual DPO May Jun Target DPO Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
9.500 Actual Average W/C Action 1 Potential Action 2 Potential Action 3 Potential Action 4 Potential Action 5 Potential Optimized Average W/C
12
Take Action !
100 90 80
W/C Improvement ('000 EUR)
100 90 90 80 70 60 60 60 60 52 43 60 50 60 60 60 60 50 40 30 29 22 12
14 9 9 DSO (Days)
70 60 50 40 30 20 15 10
157 48 28
28
30 20 10
9 4
Supplier G0228 16
0
Supplier D0263 Supplier C8003 Supplier O0226 Supplier C0344 Supplier S0077 Supplier E0214 Supplier T0279 Supplier S0264 Supplier B0272
Potential WC
Actual DPO
Target DPO
13
Contents
14
Focus on capturing A/R opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in customer service and O-t-C process
Pricing is conducted using a non-integrated database. The same customer is offered different terms by different parts of the organisation Claims for VAT on purchases made near the end of accounting period delayed until next period Order entry process not integrated with inventory or production leading to increased safety stock holdings Customers are given payment discounts even when not paying within terms No process owner resulting in a lack of collections focus
Credit authorisation
Order entry
Entry errors cause disputes and drive additional cost and re-work in shipping, handling and returns processing
Shipping and invoicing systems are separate. Invoices are manually re-keyed in billing spreadsheet for distribution to customer delaying process
Collection representatives currently wait until payments are 30 days past due date to begin contacting customers
Unclear spilt of responsibiliti es between sales units and shared service operations
Limited visibility / reporting to identify and focus on problem receivables. Not fully leveraging VAT relief opportunities
Engagement examples
The CFO of a manufacturing company informed us that he was looking for a quick way to detect unrevealed cash. We used our Cash @ Risk tool to scan the receivables. The tool revealed that 0,95% of the production orders had not been invoiced and 0,25% of the invoices showed negative pricing differences with the master price table. Further investigation showed the presence of duplicate volume rebates due to system errors. Our assistance resulted in a net cash gain of 0,55% of the revenues.
16
18,000
11.500
16,522
16,000
11.300
11.244
700
14,093
14,000
13,500 12,713
11.100
13,894 13,744
11,966
11,875
12,118
12,000
'000 EURO
11,842
10,871
10.900
11,435
10,846
11,115
11,162
11,297
9,947
10,000
9,750
10,461
7,744
7,902
8,000
8,656
8,887
100
Faster Dunning Other Customers
10.300
6,191
5,673
6,151
6,000
50
Align Invoice Terms Renegotiate Terms Fast Payers
200
10.100 9.900
4,000
9.944
Renegotiate Terms Small Customers
2,000
9.700
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr Actual W/C May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
9.500 Actual Average W/C Action 1 Potential Action 2 Potential Action 3 Potential Action 4 Potential Action 5 Potential Optimized Average W/C
17
DSO (Days)
18
W/C Improvement (GBP)
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
5.000
0 44 51
SLBM Systems 25.764
71
94
74
84
Zap
21.694
46
55
SIG Trading
19.184
47 43
64
82
Door Panels
18.644
46
59
Potential WC
Bailey Caravans 17.740
47
58
Take Action !
Actual DSO
Marine Harvest Ireland Tarmac Topfloor
13.688
53
68
11.852
46
55
Target DSO
11.700
50
64
Cordek
11.183
36
47
Daewoo Electronics UK
10.332
48
61
Walcon Marine
8.861
64
85
Norbrook Labs
8.587
46 42
Buildbase Limited
8.009
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
- 328.701
7.175.950
1.469.393
We would recommend to assess further targeted action to improve the working capital and the P&L: Unrightfully deducted cash discounts (payment date 3 days beyond contractual date) should not be accepted, or should be deducted from the year end discount ( 250.135); The review of 6 specific payment terms could further improve the cash position with 328.701, and could reduce the cash discounts with 70.939. In addition the company should consider rationalizing its current 54 payment terms, and consider increasing the dunning frequency.
19
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009
Contents
20
Focus on capturing inventory opportunities & tracking benefits rather than implementing sophisticated tools
Typical issues in Supply Chain and F-t-F process
Disconnect between forecasting process and Sales and Marketing drives need for additional stock holdings
Unstable forecasted requirements & unresponsive suppliers lead to increased stock holdings requirements
Long lead-times result in the need for additional stock holdings to meet variations in customer demand
Multiple inventory locations leading to higher inventory levels, including hidden or off balance sheet inventory
Demand planning
Inventory planning
Manufacturing
Fulfilment
Demand Planning department adds in gut feel safety stocks just in case
Limited analysis of supply chain performance and capabilities results in increased safety stock holding
Blanket stocking policies drive increases in items with differing demand and profitability characteristics
Limited manufacturing changeover flexibility resulting in need for additional stock buffers
21
Inventory: Recovery
Before any action can be taken to optimize inventory, the accuracy of the inventory levels should be properly controlled. Typical issues are:
Reported scrap BOM accuracy materials movement accuracy Reported obsolete stock Other Engagement examples
Deloitte was requested to optimize the inventory levels of a client. As a first step, the inventory accuracy was investigated based on defined KPIs. Only after improvement of these KPIs, the actual optimization was started.
22
Inventory: Optimization
Opportunities to reduce inventory in a short time frame are identified by the following: Analyzing the weeks on hand versus the revenue generated per item Assessing against industry best practices and averages Providing insight in excess inventory against expectations
Inventory (excluding D-items)
29% 23%
49%
16% 52%
Resulting in short term, quick win actions per SKU like: Production and or replenishment stop Increasing sales efforts and or price reductions Obsolescence review
23
32%
20.000.000
Obsolete stock
Articles on reservation
4.400.000
Some conclusion from this stock analysis were: The stock in the central warehouse could be reduced with 8,8 million euro. The overstock was mainly due to historical orders An accurate stock policy should be developed for slow movers. The reorder points and order quantity were relatively well defined, but real inventory was higher than the calculated inventory level according to the defined reorder points.
24
Polling question 2
Where do you believe the greatest improvements remain in working capital reduction?
1. 2. 3. 4. Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Inventory NA / Dont know
25
Contents
26
Working Capital opportunities are tackled by a variety of improvements on the three pillars leading to optimised asset efficiency
Receive Invoice Goods Received Days in raw materials inventory Days of WIP Days in finished goods inventory Days in transit
Cash Out ()
Reduce Gap
Place Invoice
Cash In ()
Optimization
Review safety stock levels and re-order points across different product and customer segments Review policies for slow moving inventory. Set up disposal programmes for obsolete stock
Focus on order management process to ensure no barriers to timely payment contact customers directly when payments are due Eliminate manual or redundant processing steps
Transformation
Redefine purchasing power to improve negotiated terms and conditions Redefine authorizations within the organisation to ensure conformance to terms and conditions negotiated
Review production strategy and planning policies Revise planning processes and responsibilities to improve demand visibility and forecast accuracy Reduce the fragmentation of holding inventory
Align and optimise payment terms and conditions across territories and customers Integrate order entry processes with inventory or production leading to decrease safety stock holdings Align shipping and invoicing systems
Webinar Cash@ Risk 23/10/2009
27
Polling question 3
28
Contents
29
Contact details
Contact
Direct phone
Mobile
tvancauwenberge@deloitte.com
+32 2 800 22 79
+32 496 57 49 30
wdenhaese@deloitte.com
+32 2 800 24 03
+32 476 49 66 24
Bjorn Borghs
bborghs@deloitte.com
+32 2 800 20 15
+32 475 75 42 86
30