DOJ Death of Jesus aka Department of Justice Romans 13 TASK Truth and Source Kill Of the coop Dont

smell the poop Husha husha All fall down Coup dtat Ha ha even the rats The Lord Gaveth Thats that Were it sanity the calling From highest peaks resonate DIE Desolate intellectual epitaph Mars Masticators again ravish self 2B or not 2B WTF God damn were Satanic for Christ sake

Bully Brat Beasts BBB Bibbidy Bobbidy Boo Humans live in a shoe Providing the advantage Whatcha gonna do Not an authentic Christian among the docile sheep Mary had a little lamb thought it was delicious the rest a stole

POSSESSED Power of Satanic Spirit Enslavement Simplistic Systemics Equally Demonized PRICK I FIBIB
Political Religious Intellectual Charlatan Kleptocracy inciting Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss

Oh yes of course with sword back 1

www.SatanicLaw.com ACCOMPL ICE Appropriators Cooperative Conspiracy Organized Mastication Populace Lethargy Implicit Complicit Explicit ICE Insidious Capitalist Emperors Like other financial empires in history, Smith claims the contemporary model forms alliances necessary to develop and control wealth, as peripheral nations remain impoverished providers of cheap resources for the imperial-centers-ofcapital.[1] Belloc estimated that, during the British Enclosures, "perhaps half of the whole population was proletarian", while roughly the other "half" owned and controlled the means of production. Now, under modern Capitalism, J.W. Smith claims fewer than 500 people possess more wealth than half of the earths population, as the wealth of 1/2 of 1-percent of the United States population roughly equal that of the lower 90percent. YOYOS Yes Oh Yes Outrageous Sanity POST SCRIPT Puppets on strings tyrannize Self conscience rest in peace testimonials YOYOS 2

Attempting to paint the picture of what it is to be fully human Satanic paint the vivid picture of what it is to be fully Satanic BS up to here humans disappear SCALP PIT ROP TIP PLACS Satanic Court Alone Lucifer Prognosis Public Inquiry Transitive Reverse Osmosis Psychosis Transcendental Intuitive Prospects Precedence Lucifer Acts Complicit Self What is Fiction Mummy Nonfiction zombie dearest SNAKE PITS IONS Satanic Nations Arbitrary Kleptocracy Exposed Public Inquiry Tacit Systemic If Only Naturally Sane www.HIECER.com Spirit of Law Human Inherent Emotional Cause Effect Reactor Letter of Law SOL HIECER LOL SSS Satanic Sucker Sandwich PIG/Trough/PIGLET www.SatanicLaw.com http://www.scribd.com/doc/113882934/Spirit-Intent-Precedence-de-Jure-Constitution-or-Romans-13Gaming-the-System-de-Facto SPHINX Satanic Pyramid Humanity Incinerator Nefarious X-mas

Humanity
Independent Judiciary
Rule of Law Romans 13
Tradition Neutering DJ VU Pro con Diversionary Elusive Justice Articulated Validity Undermine

Constitution ID

mits

Edict

De facto

DARK AGES Demonstrably Articulate Righteous Kleptocracy Attorney General Exposes Self

Substantive Thick
EJECT Equal Justice Emission Constipation Terminal

"Thy kingdom come"

The request for God's kingdom to come is usually interpreted as a reference to the belief, common at the time, that a Messiah figure would bring about a Kingdom of God. Traditionally the coming of God's Kingdom is seen as a divine gift to be prayed for,

not a human achievement.

This idea is frequently challenged by groups who believe that the Kingdom will come by the hands of those faithful to work for a better world. It is believed by these individuals that Jesus' commands to feed the hungry and clothe the needy are the Kingdom to which he was referring.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations SHAMELESS UN C HARM SCHOOL Spirit Humanity a Monetary Exploitive Leveraging Egoist Self Sabotage United Nefarious Conspiracy Humanity Arbitrary Righteous Mastication Sanctity Consecrated Humanity Ordinance Obey Lucifer

God doG Gold ordains dominance do-gooders operate Godly http://www.scribd.com/doc/57985401/To-United-Nations-Again Dont look to the soldiers for help they got their own can of worms set in mind

On 4 October 1943, Himmler referred explicitly to the extermination of the Jewish people during a secret SS meeting in the city of Pozna(Posen). The following is a translation of an excerpt from a transcription of an audio recording[77] that exists of the speech: I also want to refer here very frankly to a very difficult matter. We can now very openly talk about this among ourselves, and yet we will never discuss this publicly. Just as we did not hesitate on 30 June 1934, to perform our duty as ordered and put comrades who had failed up against the wall and execute them, we also never spoke about it, nor will we ever speak about it. Let us thank God that we had within us enough self-evident fortitude never to discuss it among us, and we never talked about it. Every one of us was horrified, and yet every one clearly understood that we would do it next time, when the order is given and when it becomes necessary. I am now referring to the evacuation of the Jews, to the extermination of the Jewish People. This is something that is easily said: 'The Jewish People will be exterminated', says every Party member, 'this is very obvious, it is in our program elimination of the Jews, extermination, a small matter.' And then they turn up, the upstanding 80 million Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. They say the others are all swine, but this particular one is a splendid

Jew. But none has observed it, endured it. Most of you here know what it means when 100 corpses lie next to each other, when there are 500 or when there are 1,000. To have endured this and at the same time to have remained a decent person with exceptions due to human weaknesses has made us tough, and is a glorious chapter that has not and will not be spoken of. Because we know how difficult it would be for us if we still had Jews as secret saboteurs, agitators and rabble rousers in every city, what with the bombings, with the burden and with the hardships of the war. If the Jews were still part of the German nation, we would most likely arrive now at the state we were at in 1916 and '17 . . . . Heinrich Himmler, 4 October 1943

Humanity Spirit S ESS Epitome Simplicity Sanity 3D Demonic Deviates Deviate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution

A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single collection or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to comprise a written constitution. Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution in that it would define how that organization is constituted. Within states, whether sovereign or federated, a constitution defines the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some constitutions, especially written constitutions, also act as limiters of state power by establishing lines which a state's rulers cannot cross such as

fundamental rights.
Generally, every modern written constitution confers specific powers to an organization or institutional entity, established upon the primary condition that it

abides by the said constitution's limitations.

According to Scott Gordon, a political organization is constitutional to the extent that it "contain[s] institutionalized mechanisms of power control for

the protection of the interests and liberties of the citizenry,

including those that may be in the minority."[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1982 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights. The Charter is intended to protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada

****from****
the policies and actions of all levels of government. http://www.scribd.com/doc/112431371/Would-a-Government-Appointed-Court-of-CompetentJurisdiction-Independent-Judiciary-Be-Appropriate-to-Protect-Us-From-Appropriating-Governments It is also supposed to unify Canadians around a set of principles that embody those rights.[3][4] The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was introduced by the government of John Diefenbaker in 1960. However, the Bill of Rights was only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document. Therefore, it was limited in scope and was easily amendable. This motivated some within government to improve rights protections in Canada. The movement for human rights and freedoms that emerged after World War II also wanted to entrench the principles enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[5] Hence, the government of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau enacted the Charter in 1982. Universal Declaration of Human Rights The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. World War II atrocities and genocide led to a ready consensus that the new organization must work to prevent any similar tragedies in the future. An early objective was creating a legal framework for considering and acting on complaints about human rights violations. The UN Charter obliges all member nations to promote "universal respect for, and observance of, human rights" and to take "joint and separate action" to that end. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

though not legally binding,

was adopted by the General Assembly in 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all. The Assembly regularly takes up human rights issues. A large share of UN expenditures addresses the core UN mission of peace and security. The peacekeeping budget for the 20052006 fiscal year was approximately US$5 billion, 2.5 billion (compared to approximately US$1.5 billion, 995 million for the UN core budget over the same period), with some 70,000 troops deployed in 17 missions around the world.[60] UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale, but including a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. As of 1 January 2011, the top 10 providers of assessed financial contributions to United Nations peacekeeping 7

operations were: the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, China, Canada, Spain and the Republic of Korea.[61] Special UN programmes not included in the regular budget (such as UNICEF, the WFP and UNDP) are financed by voluntary contributions from other member governments. Most of this is financial contributions, but some is in the form of agricultural commodities donated for afflicted populations. Since their funding is voluntary, many of these agencies suffer severe shortages during economic recessions. In July 2009, the World Food Programme reported that it has been forced to cut services because of insufficient funding.[62] It has received barely a quarter of the total it needed for the 09/10 financial year. Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the atrocities of the Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5] Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of human rights developed during the early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition, became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political discourse of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Multinational companies play an increasingly large role in the world, and have been responsible for numerous human rights abuses.[52] Although the legal and moral environment surrounding the actions of governments is reasonably well developed, that surrounding multinational companies is both controversial and ill-defined.[citation needed] Multinational companies' primary responsibility is to theirshareholders, not to those affected by their actions. Such companies may be larger than the economies of some of the states within which they operate, and can wield significant economic and political power. No international treaties exist to specifically cover the behavior of companies with regard to human rights, and national legislation is very variable. Jean Ziegler, Special Rapporteur of the UN Commission on Human Rights on the right to food stated in a report in 2003: In August 2003 the Human Rights Commission's Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights produced draft Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights.[54] These were considered by the Human Rights Commission in 2004,

but have no binding status on corporations and are not monitored.

[55]

A lie told Often enough becomes the Reality

8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nqDkCzwXeY&feature http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LctoUV-tag&feature=relmfu Vietnam Iraq War http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Khut8xbXK8&feature=related Bush broke every law in the books of the US Constitution and UN Charter Now I lay me down to sleep before I ... Say again the purpose of financing the United Nations Globalization http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_3K1PCZHE0&feature Banked into submission Truth kills truth saves Save yourself and the world http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490#
In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a militaryintelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU Truth Kills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&feature Fema Detention Camps Marshall Law http://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/

Genocide 2012
The Judiciary and Bar must be independent of the Government financed by the people for the people http://www.scribd.com/doc/113312513/Ministry-Attorney-General-Responsible-for-DoublethinkOversight-of-No-Accused-Counsel-Illegal-Certainty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights Human rights are commonly understood as "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.[2] The doctrine of human rights in international practice, within international law, global and regional institutions, in the policies of states and in the activities of non-governmental organizations, has been a cornerstone of public 9

policy around the world. The idea of human rights [3] states, "if the public discourse of peacetime global society can be said to have a common moral language, it is that of human rights." TIED Tacit: Unspoken, implicit, inferred, implied, understood, unstated Inalienable: unchallengeable, absolute, immutable, not able to be forfeited, unassailable, incontrovertible, indisputable, undeniable Essential: Necessary, vital, indispensable, important, crucial, critical Demonstrably: Obviously, palpably, patently, evidently, noticeably, perceptibly, discernibly, apparently Sane: Rational, sensible, reasonable, sound, normal, wise, commonsensical (Antonymn) Mad

Insane considered legally incompetent or irresponsible because of a psychiatric disorder showing a complete lack of reason or foresight people legally considered as psychiatrically disordered people who are considered legally incompetent or irresponsible because of a psychiatric disorder Despite this, the strong claims made by the doctrine of human rights continue to provoke considerable skepticism and debates about the content, nature and justifications of human rights to this day.

Indeed,
the question of what is meant by a "right" is itself controversial and the subject of continued philosophical debate.[4] Complicit: It was clear that some of the staff were complicit in the attempt to cover up the scandal. http://www.scribd.com/doc/112776866/Attorney-General-Guardian-of-the-Public-Interest-PredeterminedNot-Responsible-for-His-Actions-Under-Section-8 Many of the basic ideas that animated the human rights movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the atrocities of The Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5] Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of human rights developed during the early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo10

Christian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition that became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political discourse of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of the twentieth century. Gelling as social activism and political rhetoric in many nations put it high on the world agenda. [8] All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)[9]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people is the belief Know that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people, who are the source of all political power. It is closely associated to the social contract philosophers, among whom are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality.[1] It is often contrasted with the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty. Benjamin Franklin expressed the concept when he wrote, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns."[2] BIAS ROBS Benevolence Inherent Appropriating Satanic Rise on Bull Shit

11

HE Human Equals HIM Humanity Industrial Machine HIS Humanity is Science Co-op No servants no superiors monetary gains UP Ultimate Potential UPS Ultimate Potential Society According to some theories of democracy, popular sovereignty is the founding principle of such a system.[3] However, the democratic principle has also been expressed as "the freedom to call something into being which did not exist before, which was not given and which therefore, strictly speaking, could not be known."[4] This type of freedom, which is connected to human "natality," or the capacity to begin anew, sees democracy as "not only a political system [but] an ideal, an aspiration, really, intimately connected to and dependent upon a picture of what it is to be human of what it is a human should be to be fully human."[5] Reality is the Truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception Truth is that which would be observed by God whether or not He exists or whether or not one believes He exists IDEAL Simply reality sanely dealt with which was not given could not be known. BOBS Burning of Books Syndrome http://www.scribd.com/doc/113233414/How-Do-You-Inform-the-Brainwashed-They-Are-Reptilian-MindedZombies-Without-Getting-Hurt

Pick your Knows

12

1/30/13 Franky scheduled for court though wont to do much older and sicker now appears wont make it
A lone life wasted a Public Inquiry prior will prevent WW III humanity wasted only desire will douse satanic fire

A Tree Grows in Crookland

Faade From a cocoon authentic democracy evolves Melting Implicit Complicit Explicit MICE

www.Tree13.com

13