Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 26

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 21 of 46 PageID 270

Exhibit 5

Appx. 000021

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 22 of 46 PageID 271

Page 1

********************************************************* TRANSCRIPTION OF AUDIO RECORDING/VOICEMAIL MESSAGE *********************************************************

TRANSCRIBED BY: Pennie Futrell, CSR


Appx. 000022

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11


Page 2 1 2 3 4 5

Page 23 of 46 PageID 272

6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25

MR. PETRAS: Mr. Crawford, my name is Michael Petras, telephone number 650-862-6320. I will follow up with a quick e-mail, but could you give me a call? Id like to talk to you about buying Glacial Energys loan from you. I am in the process of suing Gary Mole for fraud and the -- you can look that up online. But Im not here to talk about that. Id like to talk to you about what would it take to -- to buy the loan out. From what I hear, its -- its less than 50, 60 million. From the UCCs Ive gleaned, Im fairly certain hes in -- hes in default of the loan agreement and I think thats just probably the simpler way than suing him and probably a much more constructive way for all the stakeholders. But anyway, give me a call when you have a chance, 650-862-6320. Thank you. (End of recording.)

Page 3 1 2 3 4 5

CERTIFICATION OF AUDIO RECORDING


I, Pennie Futrell, Certified Shorthand Reporter in and for the State of Texas, certify that I have listened to and transcribed the foregoing audio recording/voicemail furnished to me to the best of my ability. I further certify that I am neither attorney or counsel for, related to, nor employed by any parties to the action in which this testimony is taken, and further, that I am not a relative or employee of any counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially interested in the action. day of Certified to by me on this, the ,2011.

6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15

16 17 18 PENNIE FUTRELL, C Expiration Date: 12/31/1 Firm Registration No. 526 Corporate Plaza I, Suite 152 4950 N. OConnor Road Irving, Texas 75062 972.719.5000 972.717.3985 (fax) 08

21 22 23 24 25

2 (Pages 2 to 3)
Appx. 000023

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 24 of 46 PageID 273

Exhibit 6

Appx. 000024

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 25 of 46 PageID 274

CAUSE NO. DC-1 1-05008 MICHAEL V. PETRAS, Plaintiff, IN THE DISTRICT COURT 298TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT GARY MOLE; JULIE CANNON; CHARLES KAPLAN; KAPLAN & ASSOCIATES, LLP; JUSTIN KAPLAN; GLACIAL ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY HOLDING I, LLC; GLACIAL ENERGY HOLDINGS II, LLC; GLACIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF ILLINOIS, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF MICHIGAN, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW JERSEY INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW YORK, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF OHIO, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF TEXAS, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF WASHINGTON DC, INC.; and GLACIAL ENERGY, INC., Defendants.

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID LEVY


BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared David Levy, who, being by me duly sworn, testified as follows: "My name is David Levy. I am of sound mind and capable of making this affidavit. All of the facts contained herein are true and correct and based on my personal knowledge. I am a Portfolio Manager at Centurion Credit Management LLC (Centurion), which has loaned funds to some of the Glacial Defendants. On or about April 28, 2011, Michael V. Petras (Plaintiff) called Centurion. I returned his call soon thereafter, but not on the same day, and Plaintiff told me that he believed the Glacial Defendants had multiple defaults in their loan with Centurion. Plaintiff also offered to buy our note with the Glacial Defendants, possibly at a premium. In addition, Plaintiff told me that he believed the Glacial Defendants had made false representations to various Public Utility Commissions (PUC) and that Plaintiff had reached out to multiple PUCs.

AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID LEVY 029426.0104\60415 1.01

Page 1
Appx. 000025

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 26 of 46 PageID 275

Plaintiff informed me that, because of these defaults, Plaintiff wanted to put Glacial in foreclosure and that he would be happy if Glacial was successful so long as Gary Mole was left with nothing. When I asked Plaintiff how he would finance such a purchase, it was clear to me that Plaintiff did not have the cash on hand, but that Plaintiff had people who want to help, like Shell and other energy companies. Further Affiant sayeth not."

David Levy SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this Vth day fMay 1011.

otary Public

My Commission Expires:
NAFTALI MANELA NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01MA6084429 Qualified In Kings County My Commission Expires December 02. 20

AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID LEVY 029426.0104\60415 1.01

Page 2
Appx. 000026

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 27 of 46 PageID 276

Exhibit 7

Appx. 000027

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 28 of 46 PageID 277

CAUSE NO. 11-05008 MICHAEL V. PETRAS, Plaintiff,


V.

GARY MOLE; JULIE CANNON; CHARLES KAPLAN; KAPLAN & ASSOCIATES, LLP; JUSTIN KAPLAN; GLACIAL ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.; LLC; GLACIAL ENERGY HOLDINGS II, LLC; GLACIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF ILLINOIS, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF MARYLAND, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF MICHIGAN, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW JERSEY, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF NEW YORK, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF OHIO, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF TEXAS, INC.; GLACIAL ENERGY OF WASHINGTON DC, INC.; and GLACIAL ENERGY, INC., Defendants.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

298th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS - SUBPOENA TO ANY SHERIFF OR CONSTABLE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS OR OTHER PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SERVE AND EXECUTE SUBPOENAS AS PROVIDED IN TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 176 -------------GREETINGS: You are hereby commanded to summon CitiBank, N.A. (One Lincoln Park, 8401 N. Central Expressway, Dallas, TX 75225) to produce and permit inspection and copying of the documents or tangible things designated on Exhibit A that are in its possession, custody, or control at the offices of Miller, Egan, Molter & Nelson, LLP, 4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75205, on June 3, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in connection with the above styled civil action pending before said Court. This subpoena is issued at the request of the above Plaintiff, Michael V. Petras, by his attorneys, Kerry Peterson and Matthew Rinaldi, Miller, Egan, Molter & Nelson, LLP, 4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75205.

SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK, N.A. - Page 1


Appx. 000028

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 29 of 46 PageID 278

FAILURE BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT ADEQUATE EXCUSE TO OBEY A SUBPOENA SERVED UPON THAT PERSON MAY BE DEEMED A. CONTEMPT OF THE COURT FROM WHICH THE SUBPOENA IS ISSUED OR A DISTRICT COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE SUBPOENA IS SERVED, AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY FINE OR CONFINEMENT, OR BOTH. HEREIN FAIL NOT, but of this writ make due return showing how you have executed the same. ISSUED ON May 3, 2011, Kerry C. Peterson Texas State Bar No. 24012195 cerry.petcrson@rnilieregan.com Matthew D. Rinaldi Texas State Bar No. 24033122 rnatt.rina1di(mi1Ieregan. corn MILLER, EGAN, MOLTER & NELSON LLP 4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 1250 Dallas, Texas 75205 Telephone: (214) 628-9500 Facsimile: (214) 628-9507 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK N A. - Page 2


.

Appx. 000029

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 30 of 46 PageID 279

RETURN
Came to hand the

day of

2011, at

- o clock

in., and executed by delivering a copy of this subpoena to the within named witness at the following time and place to-wit:

and not executed as to the witness for the following reason:

I actually and necessarily traveled

miles in the service of this Subpoena, in

addition to any other mileage I may have traveled in the service of other process in this cause during the same trip. Summoning Witness - $ Mileage ..........Total $ $ By County, Texas

SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK, N.A. - Page 3


Appx. 000030

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 31 of 46 PageID 280

EXHIBIT A

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS The terms "YOU" and "YOUR" as used herein meansCitiBank, N.A.; and any of
its subsidiaries.

The terms "DOCUMENT," "DOCUMENTS" and/or "WRITING" as used herein 2. is intended to have the broadest possible meaning and encompasses without limitation the the Ehotostatting,-. photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail ("e-mail") or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication and representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, and symbols, or combinations thercof, any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored, specifically including Electronically Stored Information ("ESI"). DOCUMENT REOUESTS All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy Holdings, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy Holdings, LLC, including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy Holdings II, LLC, including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of California, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Illinois, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Maryland, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Michigan, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys.
SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK, N.A. - Page 4
Appx. 000031

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 32 of 46 PageID 281

All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of New England, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of New Jersey, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Ohio, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, --representati-ve-,andattorneys .- ................-All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Pennsylvania, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Texas, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy of Washington D.C., Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, to and from Glacial Energy, Inc., including any of its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative, and attorneys. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, from Gary Mole on behalf Glacial Energy Holdings, Inc., Glacial Energy Holdings I, LLC, Glacial Energy Holdings II, LLC, Glacial Energy of California, Inc., Glacial Energy of Illinois, Inc., Glacial Energy of Maryland, Inc., Glacial Energy of Michigan, Inc., Glacial Energy of New England, Inc., Glacial Energy of New Jersey, Inc., Glacial Energy of New York, Inc., Glacial Energy of Ohio, Inc., Glacial Energy of Pennsylvania, Inc., Glacial Energy of Texas, Inc., Glacial Energy of Washington DC, Inc., or Glacial Energy, Inc. (each of the aforementioned corporate entities are collectively referred to as "Glacial Entities.") All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to Gary Mole wherein any subject matters pertaining to any of the Glacial Entities was discussed. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, from Charles Kaplan on behalf any of the Glacial Entities.

SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK, N.A. - Page 5


Appx. 000032

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 33 of 46 PageID 282

All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to Charles Kaplan wherein any subject matters pertaining to any of the Glacial Entities was discussed. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU received from anyone acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to anyone acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to oftheGiacialEntities -was discussed. anyone All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to anyone acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities. Any and all DOCUMENTS YOU maintain in connection with any of the Gary Mole, Charles Kaplan, Julie Cannon, Justin Kaplan, anyone else acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities, or Glacial Entities, including, without limitation, any applications for credit or loans, promissory notes, letters of credit, lines of credit, credit cards, investments, or any of YOUR financial services. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, wherein any subject matters pertaining to Gary Mole, Julie Cannon, Charles Kaplan, Justin Kaplan, anyone else acting on behalf of any of the any of the Glacial Entities, or any of the Glacial Entities was discussed. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU sent to Patton Boggs, LLP wherein any subject matters pertaining to Gary Mole, Julie Cannon, Charles Kaplan, Justin Kaplan, anyone else acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities, or any of the Glacial Entities was discussed. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU received from Patton Boggs, LLP wherein any subject matters pertaining to Gary Mole, Julie Cannon, Charles Kaplan, Justin Kaplan, anyone else acting on behalf of any of the Glacial Entities, or any of the Glacial Entities was discussed. All DOCUMENTS, including correspondence and electronic communication, YOU received from Patton Boggs, LLP wherein Michael Petras was identified or discussed.

SUBPOENA OF CITIBANK N.A. - Page 6


Appx. 000033

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 34 of 46 PageID 283

Exhibit 8

Appx. 000034

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11


Anderson, Dan
From: Sent:

Page 35 of 46 PageID 284

To:
Subject:

MICHAEL PETRAS [michaelpetras@yahoo.com ] Friday, May 13, 2011 10:19 AM Anderson, Dan Re: PUG Texas now has open investigation into Glacial

Thank you, my contact information is: Michael Petras 24269 Dawnridge Dr. Los Altos, CA 94024 fax: 415-276-8925 Have a good weekend. I will work on this formal complaint and return it as soon as I get it. MVP On May 13, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, As I stated in my last e-mail below, if you wish to pursue this further at the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, you could file a formal complaint or write a letter to our Chairman including all the supporting documents. If you wish to do so, please provide me with your mailing address or fax number. Sincerely, Dan Anderson Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

Mr. Petras, If you wish to pursue this matter further.at the PUCO, you can file a formal complaint. I can send the paperwork to you by mail or fax, if you would provide me with your contact information. The other option is to send a letter to our chairman outlining the specific allegations and the evidence in support of the allegations. You may write to: Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Attn: Chairman Todd Snitchier 180 E. Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215 You may also consider contacting the Ohio Consumers Counsel to see if they are interested in this matter. They are the advocate for residential utility consumers in the state of Ohio. Their website is www.pickocc.org <htti://www.pickocc.org >.

Appx. 000035

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 36 of 46 PageID 285

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS 1maiIto:michaelpetrasyahoo.com1 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 1:56 PM

To: Anderson, Dan Subject: PUC Texas now has open investigation into Glacial

Dan, I guess I was just a bit too early approaching you before. Randy Klaus at the PUCT informed me yesterday that the information that I provided last month has lead to a formal investigation being opened. He is willing to field questions about his investigation from other PUCs. His contact information is: Randy Klaus
512-936-7456

randy.klaus(puc.state.tx.us Again, I am ready to stand by and provide any documents you may need. Michael Petras
65-862-6320

Appx. 000036

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 37 of 46 PageID 286

Anderson, Dan
From: Sent:
To: MICHAEL PETRAS [michaelpetras'yahoo.com ] Thursday, April 28, 20111:53 PM Anderson, Dan Re: response to your e-mail

Subject:

thank you. Very helpful. Sorry if I come across as push and/or angry. Michael On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, If you wish to pursue this matter further at the PUCO, you can file a formal complaint. I can send the paperwork to you by mail or fax, if you would provide me with your contact information. The other option is to send a letter to our chairman outlining the specific allegations and the evidence in support of the allegations. You may write to: Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Attn: Chairman Todd Snitchler 180 E. Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215 You may also consider contacting the Ohio Consumers Counsel to see if they are interested in this matter. They are the advocate for residential utility consumers in the state of Ohio. Their website is www.pickocc.org . Sincerely, Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator Investigation and Audit Division Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto:michaelpetras'yahoo.com ] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:36 AM
To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail

Mr. Anderson, With all due respect, given the limited information on the subject that was shared with you I am not sure how you would be able to make such a determination.

Appx. 000037

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 38 of 46 PageID 287

The commissioners that I have talked with in multiple jurisdictions consider this a very serious violation, in fact some have commented that they intend to refer it to the respective Attorney Generals for investigation. It is clear that Glacial knowingly provided false information on the Ohio application and the applications of over a dozen states. My question was to whom should I address the hundreds of pages of evidence? And when other states, including Texas, open investigations, will you revisit this decision? Thanks, Michael

On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, Our staff investigated this matter and contacted the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT). The PUCT found nothing improper with Glacials filing with them. If you have evidence indicating something improper involving Mr. Gary Mole, you should present that to the PUCT. Our staffs investigation into this matter is closed. Sincerely, Dan Anderson Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto:michaelpetras@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:04 AM

To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail Dan, I would like to notice the PUCO that Glacial Energy knowingly and intentionally lied on its application. Its alter-ego/affiliate Franklin Power had its licensed revoked in Texas in July 2006. Glacial lied on its application to intentionally defraud the minority shareholders and the customers of Franklin.
Appx. 000038

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 39 of 46 PageID 288


of both

I have all the documentation to prove that Gary Mole was/is the largest shareholder entities and controls both entities.

Is there a standard protocol for such a notification? If not, to whom to I address the letter? I would like to send a letter this week and will lay the case out and attach the evidence? Michael Petras 650-862-6320

On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, In the end, it would be up to our Commissioners to revoke a certification. If you were questioning the basis under which a company was certified by the PUCO, you would have to file to intervene under the companys certification case at the PUCO. Sincerely, Dan Anderson PUCO

DRAFT - This document is created only forth e purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto:michaelpetras@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:20 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail

Thanks for your response. If I am aware of a company intentionally filed its application improperly to hide that the predecessor license was revoked in another state and can prove it; 1) whom should I address the notification, 2) and is that grounds for revocation of that entitys PUC license. I know the second question is loaded and would involve a review of the PUC commissioners. I am not asking if PUCO would automatically pull the license, but is it grounds for revoking the license. Michael
Appx. 000039

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11 On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Page 40 of 46 PageID 289

Mr. Petras, After checking on your question, Ive been told that the example you gave in your e-mail is correct. Sincerely, Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

From: webmaster@puc.state.oh.us To: ContactThePUCO Subject: 58927 Received: 4/1/20116:37:54 PM Message: WEB ID: 58927 AT:04-01-2011 at 06:37 PM Related Case Number: TYPE: complaint NAME: Mr. Michael Petras CONTACT SENDER? Yes MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE INFORMATION: Home: 650-862-6320 Fax: (no fax number provided?) E-MAIL: michaelpetras@yahoo.com INDUSTRY: Electric ACCOUNT INFORMATION: (no utility company name provided?) (no account name provided?) (no service address provided?) (no service phone number provided?) (no account number provided?) COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION: In section B6 and B7 of the PUCO Certification Application for Retail Generation Providers and Power Marketers can you provide the definition of "predecessor of the applicant?" Would it be safe to say that if Company A which sells power is majority owned by an individual and that SAME individual later creates and owns Company B which. also sell power, that Company A is the predecessor of Company B? Thank please email me at michaelpetras&yahoo. coin should you need additional clarification.
Appx. 000040

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 41 of 46 PageID 290

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission. Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

Appx. 000041

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 42 of 46 PageID 291

Anderson, Dan
From: Sent: To: Subject: MICHAEL PETRAS [michaelpetras@yahoo.com ] Monday, April 18, 2011 1:34 PM Anderson, Dan Re: response to your e-mail

Thanks. I am aware of the seriousness of my claims. I have shown the evidence I have to several staffers at the CA PUC, who have said its very compelling and are likely to open an investigation into these allegations. They are the ones that suggested I reach out to the other jurisdictions that Glacial does business in. MVP On Apr 18, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, Im sorry for the confusion. I need to do some further checking on this internally and I will get back with you ASAP. Sincerely, Dan Anderson Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East: Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto:michaelpetras'yahoo.com Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:22 PM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail

Dan, It is a bit unclear how I am to respond. Was I ccd on this email and we are waiting for the other person ccd responds? MVP On Apr 18, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Appx. 000042

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 43 of 46 PageID 292

If I remember correctly what we discussed, does he need to file under case 08-0552-EL-CRS? If so, what

does he file?
Thanks, Dan <image001 .jpg>

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission.

Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto:michaelpetras@yahoo.COm] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:04 AM
To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail

Dan, I would like to notice the PUCO that Glacial Energy knowingly and intentionally lied on its application. Its alter-ego/affiliate Franklin Power had its licensed revoked in Texas in July 2006. Glacial lied on its application to intentionally defraud the minority shareholders and the customers of Franklin. I have all the documentation to prove that Gary Mole was/is the largest shareholder of both entities and controls both entities. Is there a standard protocol for such a notification? If not, to whom to I address the letter? I would like to send a letter this week and will lay the case out and attach the evidence? Michael Petras 650-862-6320 On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, In the end, it would be up to our Commissioners to revoke a certification. If you were questioning the basis under which a company was certified by the PUCO, you would have to file to intervene under the companys certification case at the PUCO. Sincerely, Dan Anderson Pu Co
Appx. 000043

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 44 of 46 PageID 293

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission. Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

From: MICHAEL PETRAS [mailto: michaelpetras@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:20 AM
To: Anderson, Dan Subject: Re: response to your e-mail

Thanks for your response. If I am aware of a company intentionally filed its application improperly to hide that the predecessor license was revoked in another state and can prove it; 1) whom should I address the notification, 2) and is that grounds for revocation of that entitys PUC license. I know the second question is loaded and would involve a review of the PUC commissioners. I am not asking if PUCO would automatically pull the license, but is it grounds for revoking the license. Michael On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Anderson, Dan wrote:

Mr. Petras, After checking on your question, Ive been told that the example you gave in your e-mail is correct. Sincerely, Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

From: webmaster@puc.state.oh.us To: ContactThePUCO Subject: 58927 Received: 4/1/2011 6:37:54 PM


Message:

WEB ID: 58927 AT:04-01-201 1 at 06:37 PM


Appx. 000044

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 45 of 46 PageID 294

Related Case Number: TYPE: complaint NAME: Mr. Michael Petras CONTACT SENDER? Yes MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE INFORMATION: Home: 650-862-6320 Fax: (no fax number provided?) E-MAIL: michaelpetras@yahoo.com INDUSTRY: Electric ACCOUNT INFORMATION: (no utility company name provided?) (no account name provided?) (no service address provided?) (no service phone number provided?) (no account number provided?) COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION: In section 136 and 137 of the PUCO Certification Application for Retail Generation Providers and Power Marketers can you provide the definition of "predecessor of the applicant?" Would it be safe to say that if Company A which sells power is majority owned by an individual and that SAME individual later creates and owns Company B which also sell power, that Company A is the predecessor of Company B? Thank please email me at michaelpetras@yahoo.com should you need additional clarification.

DRAFT - This document is created only for the purposes stated within. It is intended solely for staff discussion, reflecting the views of the author(s) are not necessarily the view of the Staff as a whole or the Commission. Dan Anderson, Public Utilities Administrator, Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, 7th Floor, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 995-0444.

Appx. 000045

Case 3:11-cv-01402-N Document 38-2 Filed 08/01/11

Page 46 of 46 PageID 295

Stockhausen, Chuck From: Sent: To: Subject: Stockhausen, Chuck Tuesday, April 19, 20113:37 PM jess.totten@puc.state.tx.us Glacial Energy complaint

Mr. Totten, The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) recently received an email complaint which accuses Glacial Energy of Ohio, Inc. of intentionally providing false information in its Ohio competitive retail electric service (CRES) provider certification application. Glacial Energy of Ohio was initially certified in Ohio as Power Marketer in April 2008 and was renewed in July 2010 (case 08-552-EL-CRS). Specifically, the email states that Glacial failed to disclose in its application that Gary Mole, President & Chief Executive Officer of Glacial Energy, was a primary shareholder of Franklin Power a predecessor company of Glacial Energy and that Franklin Power had its license revoked by the Texas PUC. The Ohio certification application requires disclosure of whether the applicant or a predecessor of the applicant has had any certification, license, or application to provide retail or wholesale electric service denied, curtailed, suspended, revoked, or cancelled within the past two years. I would appreciate if your office could assist in our investigation of this allegation by providing any information you might have regarding Franklin Power. Unfortunately, the complainant did not include a license, certificate or docket number for reference. Thank you for your cooperation. Chuck Stockhausen Reliability and Service Analysis Division Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department 614-728-5049 This document was created only for the purpose stated within. It is for staff discussion only and does not reflect the view of the Commission.

Appx. 000046

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi