A NEW SOLUTION FOR CANCER

Yamanaka and Gurdon discovered that mature and specialized cells "can be
(nervously also?!) reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of
developing into all tissues of the body," the Nobel Assembly at Sweden's
Karolinska Institute said. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121009a1.html
That's (exactly like) the cancer, folks!

CONTENTS i985

//garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pd
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002 . I
hhttp://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdf
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdfSI L
In 1957, a physician researcher out of the National Cancer Institute, Richmond Prehn, M.D.,
published a landmark study co-authored with his laboratory assistant, Joan M. Main. Its findings
turned conventional wisdom about cancer and the immune system on its head.
What they discovered was that surgically removing tumors from sarcoma-ridden mice not only cured
the mice of cancer the treated mice also were immune to all subsequent efforts to reinoculate them
with the same sarcoma.

Prehn and Malin were revolutionary, Dr. Curti says. Before their 1957 study, even the suggestion
that the immune system had a role to play in cancer treatment would have been regarded in many
scientific circles with skepticism. Now the hope was that new cancer therapies and vaccines could be
developed that would rival both chemotherapy and radiation in their effectiveness.
But despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Mains success, that hope has gone
largely unrealized.
What we have learned is that a successful immune system response in humans depends on not just
one event, but a series of events from the presentation of a foreign marker on the surface of the
cancer cell to the homing behavior of killer T-cells to the tumor site, Dr. Curti says. These are like
links in a chain, and any weak link can spell disaster for an effective immune system response.
http://oregon.providence.org/patients/facilities/providence-portland-medical-
center/Pages/formsandinformationlanding.aspx?&TemplateName=Bringing+out+the+big+guns+to+ki
ll+cancer&TemplateType=FormsandInstructions

In the past time, at this address, were also made references to this material.
There is a similarity between the approach of Prehn and Main and surgical method of denervation of
solid tumors (ablation and their quasi immediate inoculation to the same animal), theoretically
described as the treatment of the cancer in Gravitational Theory of Life.
Based on these procedural similarities on the recovery situation of Prehn and Main results (But
despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Mains success, that hope has gone largely
unrealized.), I used this material as a possible experimental prove of the validity of the
principle of denervation in curing solid tumors (together with the chemical method which
follows the same principle contained also in the U.S. patent below, without that the
denervation to be included among the claims):


http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patents.html?patnums=US_2005_0031648_A1&language=&).

Page. 16 of the patent (paragraph [0189])
shows that the author considers the "denervation" but that it is only noted not being the objective
pursued (because the "denervation" it must be permanent, until the tumor death).
On page 17 (paragraph [0195])
there is surprisingly long therapeutic effect occurring by the denervation process. And so on.
Why incumbent now on this subject?
First to emphasize that this context was provided and published (11/25/2001, "Libertatea" newspaper,
see posts from this address):
"I was thinking and at the possibility of avoiding the surgery. Is possible the local injection of a
substance that inhibits the nervous information flow in that area. Such kind of intervention may
simplify things", says surgeon Dorel Manu.
But mostly for that the logic of placement of immune system at the base of the processes
highlighted by Prehn and Main (which I couldn't totally dismantle until now) is wrong.
This is what finds also Dr. Curti in the above material: things are more complicated. There
are relationships between different processes which appear to be like a closed chain. Under
these conditions the positions of "cause" and "effect" are entirely relative: they keeps
changing. Proof on this behavior of processes is the Winn test:


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018371/

It shows that, at a linear evolution of ratio of quantity of immune reactants / quantity of
target" tissue, the growth process is nonlinear. I.e. the two values (the ratio and the growth)
keeps changing the role of "cause" (as in the case of x and y in a second degree equation: both
can take new values simultaneously and independently, so that may arise the situation in
which at one y value may be assigned two distinct values of x). It result that this connection
is not causal. So, it is controlled from the outside. And "outside" of the biochemical processes
can be only the electric signals.
Let's say it's just coincidence. But the most significant element passed unnoticed until now
(at least for me):


NOW PUTATIVELY IMMUNIZED ANIMALS.?!
What is this? They could be immunized but, as a researcher, you must don't have
preconceived ideas:
"In fact, the direct "observation" processes are completely ignored in an experiment.
Experiments are only protocols that lead to "cause" to "effect".
And the "cause" and the "effect" are arbitrarily chosen on the basis of "signals": the
objects and phenomena do not inherently contain these principles, to be find by an outside
"observer" only through observation. It is well-known the situation where objects and / or
phenomena have changed arbitrarily their status: from "cause" to "effect" and vice versa,
depending on the "theory" that it shape them. "Signals" perceived by many individuals (which
generates "conventions") have a role in this process.(timpul a disprut n 21.12.2012
(pag. 17), posted in Romanian).
And "immunization" must refer to a pathogen not to a process.
I.e. the term can possibly refer to METILCOLANTREN not to a tumor (the disease itself).
Don't remove the lung affected by tuberculosis for his reintroduction in the body but you
must do the immunization of the body against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccin)
In other words, there it was exclusively about the denervated tumors, now "visible" to the
immune system. In this case the experiments of Prehn and Main are an incontestable proof of
effectiveness of treatment by the method of denervation of solid tumors. By this way, I
demand again the Ministry of Health to answer at my previous steps.
The subject of this is CANCER! No one has conducted experiments of the "tumor
GROWTH, IN VITRO, beginning only with the cells and/or healthy tissues", so they can say:
we know how evolves the mechanism of the cancer.
I am a diplomat engineer in physics at the University of Bucharest.
The concern for this disease is because I worked at the Cernavoda nuclear power plant. I
think my contacts with medical domain are very consistent. Furthermore, coming from
outside, my opinions are more likely to be correct.
So: My name is Gabriel Pascu. I'm from Romania. I created a theory that tries to link the
scientific formalism with the way it is generated: by the life form" in the first place and by
"intelligent life form", in the second row. The main issue of this theory is about a real and
formally accepted pattern for living systems.
So, the problem that I try to clear up is the fact that we can't create living forms (from amorf
forms) in conditions in which all the phenomenon (dynamic, chemical and physical) on living
forms can be individually reproducible by experiments or we could find them in nature. We
knows that theirs individually developing (out of organisms) are ruled by spatial and temporal
statistics laws. Or IN the organisms such phenomenon are coordinated and the statistics laws
are not functioning (the result of this coordination is precisely geometrical determined in
space-the stable form of the result of a holding of dynamic phenomenon-the organism). And
this precise determination is not a result of material (physical, chemical) actions (which are
governed by statistic laws). So, what is the cause of this determination? That's the question?
And the answer isn't "DNA" which is a scalar information (not geometrical oriented, which
means "vector"). So he can't generate a very precise 3D geometrical distribution of the result
of a dynamic process. In the same time the answer is not a religious one! It's a strictly
scientific answer!
It is suggested by "Franois Jacob, Logic of living, Romanian Encyclopedic Publishing House, Bucharest, 1972, pp.
338:
Even if the injury (which produces cancer - my note) begins in the nucleus or cytoplasm,
or its origins are in a somatic mutation, or in the presence of a virus or a circuit disturbance,
everything that prevents cell to receiving a signal, can removing it outside of community.
Understanding cancer involves the entering in the logic of the system which imposes for the
cells the constraints of the body.
I have this answer!
But we talk here about physics, statistics, theory of information etc.
The method I found for healing the cancer is based on this answer and is good (is verified
illegally on peoples in Romania for many years)! The tumor is an independent organism
(from his host). He is intelligent, he can take decisions, he can adapt at specifics external
stimulus (treatments or action of immunologic system). This coordinated tip of behavior of
malign cells is facilitated by the connection of the tumor with the nerves of autonomic
nervous system (which offer a rich informational support and which exist- the connection- in
all situations, known or not by the medicine).
So, the principle of a method (for curing the cancer) is that: the tumor mast be isolated by the
influence of activity of the nerves (cutting the nerve or stopping the electrochemical signals
circulation influence from synapses to the tumor by activity of a neurotoxin-see American
patent: Pub. No. : US 2005/0031648 A1; Pub Date: Feb. 10, 2005).
Main and Prehn have performed such experiments in 1957 (they pull out the tumor and pull
in the same tumor to the same animal) with promising results. But they follow a different
theoretical idea (the existence of specific tumor antigens). The tumor it must stay there, after
her totally removal, by reintroducing her in the same site, immediately, now without any kind
of connections with the nerves. Because and in this area seem to be much to do, legally
speaking, I'd like to get some HELP from you. So I will now about what should I do in the
future regarding this issue.


United Nation Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation

Comisia Nationala a Romaniei pentru
UNESCO
Centrul de Studii pentru Stiinte de Granita
Pentru a transmite direct mesajul dumneavoastra tuturor
membrilor apasati clik pe butonul alaturat


Membrii Centrului de Studii pentru Stiinte de Granita
Nr.
Crt.

Numele si
prenumele
Telefon fix
Telefon
mobil
Adresa de e-mail Observatii

1 Bojor Ovidiu 0724479193 ovidiu.bojor@home.ro
2 Banc Andrei 0217262562 andrei.banc@gmail.com
3 Constandache G. 0217716744 g_constandache@yahoo.fr
4 Cristea Aurelia 0213192896
5
Dimoftache
Constantin
0213188338
6 Dop Radu 0722333999
7 Dorobantu Andrei 0726694024
8 Dumitru Constantin 0788494648 dumitruconstantindulcan@yahoo.com
9 Farcas Dan 0214138383 dandfarcas@yahoo.com
10 Filip Florin 0212128658
11 Iamandescu I.B. 0745035942 iamandb@yahoo.com
12 Ilinca Mircea 0232211686 0744514556 ilincamircea@yahoo.com
- secretar
general
13 Luchian Octavian 0745088688
14 Marginean Mircea 0723207061
15
Mencinicopschi
Gh.
0744575778
16 Oprescu Ion 0216427368 ioprescu@rnc.ro
17 Paun Ludovic 0216427368 0722204992
18 Popescu Cristian 0722336332 mcpopescu@amaltea.ro
19 Popescu Gabriel 0212304911 popescugg@yahoo.com
20 Restian Adrian 0724480247 arestian@hotmail.com
- presedinte
fondator
21
Trausan-Matu
Stefan
0724985518 trausan@racai.ro
22 Zagrean Leon 3120880 0723584722 leon.zagrean@gmail.com
23 Dragan Simona 0256491880 0723250937 sdragan@cardiologie.ro
24 Fabritius Klaus 0722345474
25 Herman Sonia 6874519 liasonia@gmail.com
26 Jompan Afilon 0722318354
27 Lazarescu Mircea 0743403631
28 Schneider Francisc 0766230134
29

Savulescu April
Geo
3172891 0722610505 Ageos@b.astral.ro
30 Sirbu Carmen 0788353460 sircar13@yahoo.com
31 Predescu Ovidiu 3186906 0720324231 opredescu@cliknet.ro
32 Tanase Dorina 3191448 0745121528 dorinatt@yahoo.com
33 Guja Cornelia 6671973 0720874396 cguja@yahoo.com
34 Ciulean Alexandru 6741757
35 Sorea Daniela 0268315956 0727357695 danasorea@yahoo.fr
36
Lucia Simona
Dinescu
3484530 0722971696 lucia_simona@yahoo.com
37
Laslo Claudia
Elena
0723345672 salasdesus@yahoo.com
38 Mironov Alexandru 0723394221
39
Robberb Peter
Oostveen
0744569507 drosa@arexim.ro
40 Stoian Marin 0727507179 marin.stoian@gmail.com
41 Pascu Gabriel 0720680484 gabipascu2000@yahoo.com

Pentru a transmite direct mesajul dumneavoastra tuturor
membrilor apasati clik pe butonul alaturat


Prima pagina