Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A17
NATE RUBIN
One in a Billion
When I was teaching English at Binhai School of Foreign Affairs in Tianjin, China, I used to practice my Chinese with the people making my food in the school cafeteria. One thing you absolutely must know living in China is, as a foreigner, no matter how hard the words may be to pronounce correctly, how to order food for yourself. But if I wanted to communicate anything significant, I would need to take a student with me to translate. I noticed that the same staff were there every day serving breakfast, lunch, and dinner. They never seemed to have any time off. So one day I asked one of my students to translate, and I asked the girl who makes my Jian Bing (egg and crispy fried noodle wrap) how many hours she works each day. She said she works at least sixteen hours a day, seven days a week. I asked her if she ever has any days off, and she said only during summer break for one month. Thats eleven months straight of virtually non-stop work. I couldnt bring myself to ask her how much (or rather how little), she was getting paid. I think maybe I was afraid to know. I always thought that was harsh and unfair, especially for a nineteen-year-old girl. Why couldnt she just go to school and get a good job like we do in the good ol US of A? First and foremost, she cant afford to leave her job. Her salary is so low that she will probably be living paycheck to paycheck for the rest of her life, or starve. This girl is also from the countryside. In China, people from the big cities, especially Beijing, have certain societal advantages over those from the countryside. Its called regional discrimination. Lastly, she is not particularly attractive. In America, this doesnt usually make any difference (that is, its not supposed to), but in China, where they require you to include a photo with your resume, it can make a huge difference. Now thinking hypothetically, if this girl had been from a comparatively mid-sized town with a population of approx. 1.4 million (you can imagine the difference beshe would still not likely be able to choose her own major. Most university students in China dont get to choose their major, but instead, are assigned majors at the discretion the university. As a result, she would struggle through her assigned program, studying subjects shes not interested in. As a teacher myself at a second tier university, I can say that the majority of my students were generally unmotivated to learn what they were studying. Finally after graduating, she would have to find a job in the ever-diluted workforce of the most populated nation in the world. If she could keep her job, then she would probably be working overtime every week for the rest of her life, with her only benefits being more money and a comfortable workplace. The truth is, her alternatives are probably worse. She could be doing construction like so many people from the countryside (sometimes even young women like her). For someone with her plight, she is actually not doing too bad. Someone might ask, What can I do to help people like her towards a better life? The answer is, just keep buying the things you need, most of which are made in China anyway. You will consequently be supporting Chinas cheap labor workforce, and those who depend directly on it. The more jobs there are, the less demand there will ultimately be for jobs. Therefore, considering Chinas rapid economic growth, the problem will eventually fix itself, although it may take a while for people like the girl who makes my egg and noodle wraps to feel the effects.
this rate of consumption. Without an alternative, society as we know it, especially in regards to energy and transportation, would crumple. Solar energy will never run out and is much more reliable. With solar energy, if your power goes out, you still have electricity. No more resetting your clocks and attempting to restore lost computer information. Additionally, solar energy is the only form of renewable power that is completely silent and unobtrusive. Even if people arent interested in bettering our world and the environment we live in, who on earth would be opposed to saving money? After the initial investment of converting to solar power (which is dropping in price as technology is improving and solar energy is becoming more prevalent), your utility bill will be much less costly due to the lack of energy used. No fuel is used in solar energy, so the cost of gasoline is cut as well. There is very little maintenance involved, and many companies offer warranties of twenty years and up, so there are hardly any additional expenses in that regard and your investment will be returned in time. Better yet, convert to solar energy and say Hello to tax breaks! Many incentives are offered for renewable energy by the United States government, including a tax credit of up to $2,000. If your solar system happens to produce more energy than you can use, a program called net metering will actually spin your meter backwards
and give you credit for the excess electricity. There has been increased media scrutiny over the solar energy company Solyndra failing, which casts a shadow over the cause of renewable energy. This dark cloud will pass however, and failure is an inevitable and important part of the process. Solar power is a relatively new concept and, understandably, will take awhile to catch on. It only makes sense for the stronger companies to thrive and the weaker ones to die out. I dont think the failure of one solar energy company is reason to write off the cause altogether and wrongfully assume that it wont make it as a popular means of generating energy in our country.Solar power systems can be installed in very remote regions. Generating our own source of electricity by powering our homes, heating our water and fueling our cars with solar power could possibly enable us to live off grid. Not needing to rely on utility companies to supply power would bring on a new sense of independence to home owners and, in the grander scheme of things, bring on the same sense of independence in regard to foreign energy sources. The capabilities of solar power far extend what it is typically being used for today in the United States. The evidence is clear: solar energy is the way of the future, we just need to embrace it as a simple yet effective way to better our planet and economy, one panel at a time.
A16
ARTHUR OCHS SULZBERGER JR., Publisher Founded in 1851 ADOLPH S. OCHS Publisher 1896-1935 ARTHUR HAYS SULZBERGER Publisher 1935-1961 ORVIL E. DRYFOOS Publisher 1961-1963 ARTHUR OCHS SULZBERGER Publisher 1963-1992
The News Sections JILL ABRAMSON, Executive Editor DEAN BAQUET, Managing Editor JOHN M. GEDDES, Managing Editor TOM BODKIN, Deputy Managing Editor WILLIAM E. SCHMIDT, Deputy Managing Editor Assistant Managing Editors RICHARD L. BERKE SUSAN CHIRA GLENN KRAMON The Opinion Pages ANDREW ROSENTHAL, Editorial Page Editor TRISH HALL, Deputy Editorial Page Editor MICHELLE McNALLY JIM ROBERTS
The Business Management SCOTT H. HEEKIN-CANEDY, President, General Manager DENISE F. WARREN, Senior V.P., Chief Advertising Officer General Manager, NYTimes.com YASMIN NAMINI, Senior V.P., Marketing and Circulation, General Manager, Reader Applications ALEXIS BURYK, Senior V.P., Advertising ROLAND A. CAPUTO, Senior V.P., Chief Financial Officer THOMAS K. CARLEY, Senior V.P., Planning TERRY L. HAYES, Senior V.P., Operations and Labor
The New York Times Company ARTHUR OCHS SULZBERGER JR., Chairman Cheif Executive Officer MICHAEL GOLDEN, Vice Chairman JAMES M. FOLLO, Chief Financial Officer R. ANTHONY BENTEN, Senior V.P. ROBERT H. CHRISTIE, Senior V.P. MARC FRONS, Senior V.P., Chief Information Officer TODD C. McCarty, Senior V.P. KENNETH A. RICHIERI, Senior V.P., General Counsel LAURENA L. EMHOFF, V.P., Treasurer DIANE BRAYTON, Secretary
RE: The Barnes Foundation To the Editor: I enjoyed the article you wrote about the Barnes Foundation and how the art has come to be in Pennsylvania. I loved the opening paragraph, and even the opening sentence and the way it flowed so nicely and sounded just like you were in conversation, making it that much easier to read. There was so much depth and I loved all of the history and facts that were compiled to form the storyline, and it left me feeling so bad for Johnson, as we all should. The way the critics are treating the art like a money-maker is horrible and definitely shouldnt be tolerated. I would have liked to see a little bit more of an opinion throughout the whole article, not just a list of facts or storyline about the art. It wasnt that obvious what stance you took until the last paragraph, but thats literally the only thing Id change about this article. Cortnie Schultz RE: Kentucky Baseball To the Editor: I feel that the article that ran last week in defense of the Kentucky basketball team was somewhat misguided in its intentions and failed to convince me of why John Caliparis trend of flipping players immediately into the NBA isnt essentially an illegitimate use of a universitys resources. Many people (including myself) love collegiate sports and we derive lots of enjoyment from seeing them compete, whether we are attending the games in real life or watching the televised version. People who are granted scholarships to play sports at a college are there (traditionally) for a specific reason. They help the collegiate team compete and they are privy to a reduced fee via scholarship money to attend to the school so that they can get an education. Sports scholarships exist to help people attend schools and be rewarded for their high level of athletic effort in high school. 99.9% of student athletes do not go on to professional level competition, they must graduate and face the real world. What of the players on the Kentucky team who do not possess the abilities to move on the NBA? What about the fact that the vast majority of players who make it to the NBA dont last more than a few years or toil in obscurity in a European league? Yes, Davis is a talented athlete, but he could permanently damage part of his body and be ruined as an athlete. One would hope they would have some sort of education to fall back on, most who drop out of the NBA do not possess a college degree and are quickly pushed into poverty (there are statistics to back this up) and this applies to
all pro sports leagues. There should be a standard of academic achievement that all student athletes must achieve regardless of their skill. Pro sports are enticing but often a pipe dream, even for those who get drafted. That being said, as long as Kentucky has decent grade standards and maybe kept students through their basic education, there should be little to worry about. Joe Kalicki RE: Food Labeling To the Editor: I think that your article provides a very unique perspective of the labeling of genetically modified or conventionally grown foods. I completely agree with the idea that everyone should know what theyre exactly buying. Though this might make the modified foods more expensive, which is not necessarily a good thing in this economy, it would be worth it for the sole fact that our nation (and other countries) are suffering from an overweight/obesity pandemic. You made an excellent statement by saying that if we take care of our bodies, in return, our bodies will take care of us. A point, which you may want to consider, is that with the introduction of more specific labeling, heart disease and diabetes from eating unhealthily will lower significantly. Because there are numerous disabled individuals in the United States that have their medical needs covered by government programs such as Medicare, billions of dollars must be accounted for to maintain these types of programs. This could save our county from some debt incurred by rising medical costs that our government ends up paying for. George Tapia RE: Nokia Rebirth To the Editor: It seems sad that a company that had been once so vital to the world of cellphones is now no longer necessary if only for its patents and technology that is being used by other competitor companies. But along those same lines, it seems as though Nokia has brought it upon themselves, with their poor planning and terrible advertising that came with the new Lumia 900 phone. The article did raise some questions about the future of Nokia, after its disappointing attempt at the new phone. The company really only has no where to go but up, and if it really intends on re-making a name for itself, its going to have to do a lot better in advertising, planning, and production. Allison Beckley
Killing Power
As the past twenty years have progressed, the ownership and freedom of firearm possession has become increasingly characteristic of America, specifically. There are many law-abiding Americans who proudly rally for their second amendment rights on a yearly basis. Our policemen are vigorously trained in the use and discharge of a firearm, and in many Americans eyes, and with good reason, are the best shots on the streets. This gun-ho attitude is not as common across the pond however. What many people dont realize is that British police officers are not permitted to carry a firearm. This is an artifact of old British law, which hasnt been changed for centuries. Many citizens express their discomfort with this fact, given the crime rate in Britain. With all of the complaints, one might ask, Why dont they just give em guns? Well according to a study done by BBC News, When asked, (British) police officers say overwhelmingly that they wish to remain unarmed. Many factors may contribute to this attitude. First of all, overall gun crime in Britain is very low, despite the UKs average crime rate. In two years, Britain and Wales experienced only 388 gun related injuries. In addition, over the course of the British Polices 183-year history, there have been no instances of a wrongful killing by a police officer with a firearm. It seems as if the British parliament is very apprehensive about whether to alter that record. Because British police officers do not carry firearms, they see themselves as more approachable. There is a general recognition that if police are walking around with guns, it changes things, says the director of The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Richard Garside. There is a history of the British people being the eyes and the ears of the police, and the last thing the British Police want, is to lose that. RE: Same-sex Marriage To the Editor: I very much enjoyed the piece written on same-sex marriage from the point of view of a cow at Chick-Fil-A. In my opinion, the piece was very well written and got its point across very fluidly. It was also an all-together joy to read since it was from the point of view of an animal that most dont think would have an opinion on such topics. I agreed one-hundred percent with the stance that Catherine took on her article. I believe that humans as a species are very complex in nature and everyone is different. I also agree that two people, regardless of gender, should have the right to be married. I think that she brought up very valid point throughout the article that touched on very real problems that two married people face and that homosexuals face as a whole. Overall, I think that the paper was very well written and that the writer had a strong connection to the piece at hand. The way the topic and argument was conveyed to me as the reader is what I think made it so much fun to read and kept me from losing my interest. Roxanne Ghezzi