Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
T
H
u
= diag [H
u
(0), H
u
(1), , H
u
(N
u
1)]
H
R
= diag [H
R
(0), H
R
(1), , H
R
(N
R
1)]
Here, F, x, and H denote the DFT spreading matrix, signal
vector before DFT spreading, and channel matrix, respectively.
Also, u, R, and U denote the uth MS, RS, and the number of
MSs, respectively. Noise terms are ignored in these equations.
Note that the DFT spreading sizes of RS and MSs, N
R
and
N
u
, are usually different.
In order to combine the signals transmitted from RS and
MSs, the signals transmitted from MSs are rewritten as
Y
M
= H
M
F
M
x
R
(3)
where
Y
M
=
_
Y
T
0
, , Y
T
u
, , Y
T
U1
T
H
M
= diag [H
0
, H
1
, , H
U1
]
F
M
= diag [F
0
, F
1
, , F
U1
]
By using the MRC technique, Y
M
and Y
R
can be com-
bined as
_
H
H
M
Y
M
+H
H
R
Y
R
_
=
_
H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+H
H
R
H
R
F
R
_
x
R
(4)
Since the term, H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+ H
H
R
H
R
F
R
, in (4) is not
a diagonal matrix, the conventional MRC technique cannot
be applied to SC-FDMA-based cooperative relays when DFT
spreading sizes for RS and MSs are different. The ML solution
for the combined signal in (4) can be given by
x
R
= argmin
xR
_
_
_
_
_
H
H
M
Y
M
+H
H
R
Y
R
_
_
H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+H
H
R
H
R
F
R
_
x
R
_
_
_
_
2
(5)
Note that the ML solution for detection of x
R
requires
a high computational complexity. When the ZF or MMSE
detection techniques are used to lower the computational
complexity, the complexity for obtaining the inverse matrix
of H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+ H
H
R
H
R
F
R
becomes higher as the DFT
spreading size increases. Also, the performance of ZF or
MMSE detection technique can be degraded signicantly if
H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+H
H
R
H
R
F
R
is not a non-singular matrix.
III. A SIMPLIFIED MRC
By multiplying complex conjugate matrices of channel, H
u
and H
R
, on both sides of (1) and (2) and taking IDFT, the
received signal at the BS can be rewritten as
F
1
u
H
H
u
Y
u
= F
1
u
H
u
2
F
u
x
u
(6)
F
1
R
H
H
R
Y
R
= F
1
R
H
R
2
F
R
x
R
(7)
where
F
1
u
H
H
u
Y
u
= [r
u
(0), r
u
(1), , r
u
(N
u
1)]
T
F
1
R
H
H
R
Y
R
= [r
R
(0), r
R
(1), , r
R
(N
R
1)]
T
and
r
u
(l
u
) =
1
N
u
Nu1
mu=0
|H
u
(m
u
)|
2
X
u
(m
u
)e
j2mulu
Nu
r
R
(l
R
) =
1
N
R
NR1
mR=0
|H
R
(m
R
)|
2
X
R
(m
R
)e
j2m
R
l
R
N
R
Right-hand sides of (6) and (7) can be rewritten as
F
1
u
H
u
2
F
u
x
u
=
x
u
(0) x
u
(N
u
1) x
u
(1)
x
u
(1) x
u
(0) x
u
(2)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
u
(N
u
1) x
u
(N
u
2) x
u
(0)
g
u
(0)
g
u
(1)
.
.
.
g
u
(N
u
1)
(8)
F
1
R
H
R
2
F
R
x
R
=
x
R
(0) x
R
(N
R
1) x
R
(1)
x
R
(1) x
R
(0) x
R
(2)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
R
(N
R
1) x
R
(N
R
2) x
R
(0)
g
R
(0)
g
R
(1)
.
.
.
g
R
(N
R
1)
(9)
where
g
u
(l
u
) =
1
N
u
Nu1
mu=0
|H
u
(m
u
)|
2
e
j2mulu
Nu
g
R
(l
R
) =
1
N
R
NR1
mR=0
|H
R
(m
R
)|
2
e
j2m
R
l
R
N
R
(8) and (9) can be expressed by the cyclic convolution as
follows:
x
u
(l
u
)
Lu1
1=0
g
u
(
1
) =
_
Lu1
1=0
r
u
(l
u
+
1
)
_
Lu1
2=1
_
x
u
(mod(l
u
2
, N
u
))
Lu1
1=2
g
u
(
1
)
_
+
_
x
u
(mod(l
u
+
2
, N
u
))
Lu21
1=0
g
u
(
1
)
_
(10)
x
R
(l
R
)
LR1
1=0
g
R
(
1
) =
_
LR1
1=0
r
R
(l
R
+
1
)
_
LR1
2=1
_
x
R
(mod(l
R
2
, N
R
))
LR1
1=2
g
R
(
1
)
_
+
_
x
R
(mod(l
R
+
2
, N
R
))
LR21
1=0
g
R
(
1
)
_
(11)
where mod(a, b) and L denote the remainder of division of
a by b and the length of channel, respectively. Substituting
initial estimates obtained by SC-FDMA detector, x
u
(l
u
) and
x
R
(l
R
), into (10) and (11), and then adding (10) and (11), we
can obtain (12). S
u
in (12) denotes the set of indices allocated
to the u-th MS before DFT spreading at RS. If the channel in
x
u
(l
u
) =
1
Lu1
1=0
g
u
(
1
) +
LR1
1=0
g
R
(
1
)
_
Lu1
1=0
r
u
(l
u
+
1
)
_
+
_
LR1
1=0
r
R
(l
R
+
1
)
_
Lu1
2=1
__
x
u
(mod(l
u
2
, N
u
))
Lu1
1=2
g
u
(
1
)
_
+
_
x
u
(mod(l
u
+
2
, N
u
))
Lu21
1=0
g
u
(
1
)
__
LR1
2=1
__
x
R
(mod(l
R
2
, N
R
))
LR1
1=2
g
R
(
1
)
_
+
_
x
R
(mod(l
R
+
2
, N
R
))
LR21
1=0
g
R
(
1
)
__
, (12)
for 0 l
u
< N
u
, l
R
S
u
Fig. 2. A block diagram of an IR-MRC
a resource block (RB) allocated to a user can be assumed to
be frequency non-selective, (12) is given by
x
u
(l
u
) =
g
u
(0) x
u
(l
u
) + g
R
(0) x
R
(l
R
)
g
u
(0) + g
R
(0)
,
for 0 l
u
< N
u
, l
R
S
u
(13)
IV. AN INTERFERENCE REJECTION-MRC
Fig. 2 shows a block diagram of the proposed IR-MRC
technique consisting of SC-FDMA signal detection, ordering,
rejection, adjustment, combining, and slicing. If the average
power of the signal vector received from the th MS, , is
the lowest, the process of interference cancellation can be
expressed in the frequency domain as
Y
R
= Y
R
H
R
F
R
J
u
= H
R
F
R
_
0
1Np
x
T
u
0
1Nn
T
(14)
where
J
u
=
_
x
T
0
x
T
u1
0
1N u
x
T
u+1
x
T
U1
T
N
p
=
u1
u=0
N
u
N
n
=
U1
u= u+1
N
u
After interference cancellation, the process of adjustment in
spreading size of the signal, , can be expressed as
Y = S
I +
NR/N u1
i=1
W
(iN u)
W
(Np)
Y
R
(15)
where
W
(a)
= diag
_
0, , e
j2mRa/NR
, e
j2(NR1)a/NR
_
Fig. 3. A concept of spreading size adjustment in IR-MRC
Y
R
, W
(a)
, and I denote the N
u
1 vector after adjustment of
spreading size, phase-rotational matrix, and N
R
N
R
identity
matrix, respectively. Here, S is dened by
S = diag [, , , ]
. .
N u
(16)
where
=
_
1 0
1(NR/N u1)
H = S
I +
NR/N u1
i=1
W
(iN u)
W
(Np)
H
R
(17)
Finally, the receive diversity combining for IR-MRC is
given by
x
u
= F
1
u
_
H
H
H +H
H
u
H
u
_
1
_
H
H
Y +H
H
u
Y
u
_
(18)
Since the matrix,
H
H
H +H
H
u
H
u
, in (18) is diagonal,
a simple scalar operation can be used for receive diversity
combining in IR-MRC. The processes from (14) to (18) are
repeated to detect the other transmitted signals. Constraints for
IR-MRC are given as follows:
N
R
=
U1
u=0
N
u
(19)
mod(N
R
, N
u
) = 0 (20)
V. SIMULATION
In this section, performances of the proposed receive diver-
sity combining techniques for SC-FDMA-based cooperative
relays are evaluated. Parameters for simulation are summarized
in Table I. It is assumed that the detected signals at RS are
error-free.
Fig. 4 shows BER performances of receive diversity com-
bining techniques for SC-FDMA-based cooperative relays.
From this gure, we can see that BER performance of the
conventional MRC technique with ZF detector, denoted by
the square, is worse than that of SISO case (solid line)
because H
H
M
H
M
F
M
+ H
H
R
H
R
F
R
, in (4) becomes near-
singular matrix. We can also see that the proposed S-MRC
technique, denoted by the circle, and the IR-MRC technique,
denoted by the triangle, achieve E
b
/N
0
gains of 8dB and
7dB, both at the BER of 10-3, compared with the SISO case,
TABLE I
PARAMETERS FOR THE SIMULATION
RS MS
DFT Spreading Size 48 24
Number of Stations 1 2
Modulation 16QAM
Bandwidth 0.625MHz
Carrier Frequency 2.3GHz
Cyclic Prex 12.8us
FFT Size 64
Channel Model ITU-PedB
5 10 15 20 25 30
10
5
10
4
10
3
10
2
10
1
ITUPedB, speed=3km/h, 16QAM
E
b
/N
0
u
n
c
o
d
e
d
B
E
R
SISO
MRC ZF
SMRC
IRMRC
IRMRC (slc)
IRMRC using SMRC (slc)
Fig. 4. BER performances of receive diversity combining techniques for
SC-FDMA-based cooperative relays
respectively. The S-MRC technique performs slightly better
than the IR-MRC technique at low E
b
/N
0
. However, the IR-
MRC technique performs better than the S-MRC technique at
high E
b
/N
0
(above 21dB). Also, the IR-MRC technique using
the output of S-MRC as initial estimates performs the best
among receive diversity combining techniques at the region
above 18dB. Here, (slc) corresponds to the case where initial
estimates obtained by the signal detector are sliced.
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we proposed two receive diversity combining
techniques for SC-FDMA-based cooperative relay systems
when DFT spreading sizes for MS and RS are different. It was
shown that the S-MRC technique performing diversity com-
bining in the time-domain is effective in obtaining diversity
gain at low E
b
/N
0
region. It was also shown that the IR-MRC
technique performing diversity combining in the frequency-
domain by adjusting DFT spreading size performs better at
high E
b
/N
0
region.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research is supported by Samsung Electronics, and
UCN Project, Knowledge and Economy Frontier R&D Pro-
gram of MKE in Korea as a result of UCNs subproject 09C1-
C2-11T.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Pabst et. al., Relay-based deployment concepts for wireless and
mobile broadband radio, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, pp. 80-89, Sept.
2004.
[2] H. Wu, C. Qiao, S. De, and O. Tonguz, Integrated Cellular and Ad Hoc
Relaying Systems: iCAR, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 19, pp.
2105-2115, Oct. 2001.
[3] T. Himsoon, W. P. Siriwongpairat, Z. Han, and K. J. R. Liu, Lifetime
maximization via cooperative nodes and relay deployment in wireless
networks, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 25, pp. 306-317, Feb.
2007.
[4] H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, Single Carrier FDMA for
Uplink Wireless Transmission, IEEE Vehicular Technology Mag., vol. 1,
pp. 30-38, Sept. 2006.
[5] REV-080019, Consideration on technical candidates for IMT-advanced,
3GPP RAN IMT Advanced Workshop, Shenzhen, Apr. 2008.