Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Observaciones
GPA = Y
ACT = X
X-
2.8
21
-4.875
-0.4125
2.0109375
23.765625
0.17015625
3.4
24
-1.875
0.1875
-0.3515625
3.515625
0.03515625
26
0.125
-0.2125
-0.0265625
0.015625
0.04515625
3.5
27
1.125
0.2875
0.3234375
1.265625
0.08265625
3.6
29
3.125
0.3875
1.2109375
9.765625
0.15015625
25
-0.875
-0.2125
0.1859375
0.765625
0.04515625
2.7
25
-0.875
-0.5125
0.4484375
0.765625
0.26265625
3.7
30
4.125
0.4875
2.0109375
17.015625
3.2125
Y-
(X- )*(Y-)
(X- )*(Y-)
25.875
5.8125
(X- )
(i) Estimate the relationship between GPA and ACT using OLS; that is obtain the intercept and slope estimates in the equation. (using the approach discussed in lecture 4 exercise: regression).
General Equation =
b =Slope =
GPA =a +b (ACT)
(X-)*(Y-)
5.8125
=
(X-)
a = Intercept=
- b =
0.102197802
0.102197802
56.875
3.2125
(ii) Comment on the direction of the relationship between GPA and ACT.
The relationship between GPA and ACT is positive or direct.
25.875
(Y-)
(X- )
0.568131868
56.875
0.23765625
SST=(Y-)
1.02875
GPA = a +b (ACT)
=
GPA =
0.5681
0.102197802
ACT
0.5681
0.102197802
20
Predicted GPA = Y
2.61
(v) How much of the variation in GPA is explained by ACT? (hint: R2 or R^2 )
GPA = a + b (ACT)
(Y - ) 2
Observaciones
GPA = Y
ACT = X
2.8
21
2.71
0.2482175
3.4
24
3.02
0.0367186
26
3.23
0.0001632
3.5
27
3.33
0.0132187
3.6
29
3.53
0.1019960
25
3.12
0.0079965
2.7
25
3.12
0.0079965
3.7
30
3.63
3.2125
R2 =
SSE
0.59402
=
SST
0.1777178
SSE=(Y - )2 =
25.875
=
1.02875
0.577423791
0.5940247
SST=(Y-)
1.02875
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Benefit
2,000
3,500
4,000
Cost
1,000
1,500
1,000
Cash Flow
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
initial investment =
N1
NPV =
N2
(1 + i)2
(1 +i)
$
N3
4,000
2,000
$
2,000.00
6,500.00
N4
(1 + i)3
(1 + i)4
i = 6%
$
1,000.00
NPV =
2,000.00
3,000.00
1.0600
2,000.00
1.1236
1.1910
NPV =
943.40
1,779.99
2,518.86
Proyect Y NPV =
6,826.43
6,500.00
326.43
1.2625
1,584.19
Proyect X
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Benefit
2,500
3,000
4,000
Cost
1,000
2,500
2,500
$1,500.00
Cash Flow
$500.00
$1,500.00
3,000
3,500
-$500.00
initial investment =
$2,000.00
i = 6%
$1,500.00
NPV =
$500.00
+
1.0600
$1,500.00
+
1.1236
-$500.00
+
1.1910
NPV =
$1,415.09
$445.00
$1,259.43
Proyect X NPV =
$2,723.47
$2,000.00
$723.47
1.2625
+
-$396.05
Father's offer
Coin
Probability (P)
Value (X)
P*(X)
Head
0.5
$20
$10
Tail
0.5
Sums of P
Expected Value
$10
Morher's Offer
Dice Num
Probability (P)
0.1667
Value (X)
3.00
P*(X)
0.50
0.1667
6.00
1.00
0.1667
9.00
1.50
0.1667
12.00
2.00
0.1667
15.00
2.50
0.1667
18.00
3.00
Sums of P
1.0000
10.50
Expected Value
2. A firm makes computer ships. One out of each 50 chips is defective, but the firm doesn't know which ones are damaged until a consumer complains. Suppose the firm makes a $4.00 profit on the sale of any working chip, but
suffers a loss of $80.00 for every defective chip because they must spend money on its reparation.
a. How much profit this firm would make on average per chip? In other words, find the expected value.
Outcome
Probability (P)
Good
0.98
Value (X)
Defective
0.02
Sums of P
P*(X)
4.00
(80.00)
Expected Value
$3.92
$
(1.60)
$2.32
1st derivative:
0 = 100 40Q
Q=
2.5
d2-dQ2 =
-40
Since d2 / dQ2 < 0 (negative), a maximum profit point has been reached.
2. Assuming that the cost function for Pepe Ganga has been derived as follows:
C = 200 0.032Q + 0.000070Q2
dC-dQ =
-0.032
0.00014
0=
-0.032
0.00014
Q=
229
d2C-dQ2 =
0.00014
Since d2C / dQ2 > 0 (positive), the output level of Q = 229 is the value that minimizes total costs.