Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
the
In This Issue:
AVO The Basics Linking Rock Physics & Seismic Attributes Page 1
Scotia Announces Two New Additions to Spring 2003 Short-course Series Scotia Sedimentology Course Series Gets Birds-eye View Scotia Technical Paper Presentations Scotia Announces Election Of New Officers Scotia Web Site Calendar of Events Corporate Profile
Figure 1
Introduction
3 Direct identification of porosity and fluid effects with seismic data is of great interest in exploration and production. In the past 10 years, both E&P and service companies have made great efforts in using AVO (amplitude versus offset) techniques to greatly increase exploration success ratios. In more recent years, great advances have been made in reservoir characterization using AVO information such as elastic inversion for fluid identification and lithology discrimination. So what is AVO and why is 3D AVO the most important technology, after 3D seismic itself, to come along in the last 15 years?
4 4 4
Amplitudes
When seismic amplitude anomalies were discovered to identify gas, companies began to drill them wherever they occurred. However, many amplitudes have no ties to hydrocarbons. The amplitudes can be caused by geologic bed geometry, porosity, lithology, processing pitfalls, poor pre-stack interpretation and numerous other reasons. Early AVO workers in the Gulf of Mexico and onshore Gulf Coast U.S. found that these successful stack amplitudes that resulted in gas discoveries were different. The amplitudes were seen to come from not only the near angles on the shot record gathers, but also the far angles, greater than 25+ degrees. Stack seismic comes from summing and averaging all amplitudes on the shot record for one time sample. AVO was thus born.
Figure 2
AVO
Key investigations and papers by Ostander (1984), Shuey (1985), Rutherford and Williams (1989), Smith and Gidlow (1987), Castagna, et al. (1993) and many others put AVO on the map. Over the last 15 years, the geoscience community has been very busy tying seismic AVO information, well log, core, rock lab measurements, surface geology or any type of data that increases the detailed descriptions of reservoir rock and fluid properties. Routine AVO analysis incorporates geologic, geophysical and petrophysical data about the reservoir and is an
AVO Gathers
When seismic data is acquired, the same area in the subsurface is sampled from many different directions and angles. The basic seismic data is the shot gather, which is all of the seismic samples that occur within a certain size area known as a bin (see
Continued on page 2
Geophysics
Synthetics Fault & horizon interpretation Attribute analysis
AVO The Basics Linking Rock Physics & Seismic Attributes Figure 3
Continued from page 1
SCOTIA I N T E G R AT I O N
Geology
Correlations
Figure 2). In AVO gather evaluation, the amplitudes are measured and plotted versus offset/angle of incidence, with a best-fit curve calculated. The slope of the best-fit curve is the gradient, referred to as G. The intercept, at zero degrees incidence angle or offset, is the P wave reflection or P. By measuring amplitudes versus offset at every time sample in the gather, all trends and anomalous changes in P and G can be tracked. P and G are the basic building blocks of all AVO attributes. Rutherford and Williams classified AVO responses as I, II, or III (see Figure 3). Class I AVO response is when the top of the reservoir is represented by an increase in impedance (peak). These gas sands show dim-outs in stack data. Class III AVO response is when the top of the reservoir is a decrease in impedance (trough). These are Gulf Coast bright spots. Class II AVO response is when the top of the reservoir is represented by a peak that decreases in amplitude, changing to a trough at far
CLASS 1
0.1
CLASS 2
Rock description
CLASS 3
0.2 Low-Impedance Reservoirs "Bright Spot"
Sequence stratigraphy
Deposition architecture
References Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L., and Kan, T.K., 1993, Rock physics the link between rock physics and AVO response, Offset-dependent reflectivity-theory and practice of AVO analysis, edited by Castagna, J.P. and Backus, M.M., 135-171. Ostrander, W.J., 1984, Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at non-normal angles of incidence, Geophysics, 49, 1637-1648. Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H., 1989, Amplitude-versus-offset in gas sands, Geophysics, Vol. 54, p680-688. Smith, G.C., and Gidlow, P.M., 1987, Weighted stacking from rock property estimation and detection of gas, Geophys. Prosp., Vol. 35, 993-1014. Shuey, R.T., 1985, A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations, Geophysics, 50, 609-614. Mr. Cox is founder and Principal Geophysicist of the on-line econsulting service known as avoavaz.com, specializing in real-time AVO modeling and 3D AVO analysis. He is currently working with Scotia Group as a Senior AVO Specialist on a PEMEX contract, which focuses on reservoir characterization and defining of reservoir limits for new discoveries in the Burgos and Sabinas basins. Mr. Cox will teach a one-day short-course entitled Basics of AVO Interpretation Workshop on March 24, 2003 as part of Scotias Spring 2003 Executive Short-course Series (see insert).
Figure 4
Petrophysics
Curve editing
Attribute modeling
Reservoir Engineering
Reservoir properties
angles/offset. On stack seismic these gas sands are invisible. With careful AVO processing, these gas sands can be seen directly and nearly as robustly as Class III bright spots.
AVO Attributes
Mathematical manipulation of the basic AVO components, P and G, lead to numerous AVO attributes that are applicable to various reservoir types (see Figure 4). P * G cross-plotting, for example, can be used over a prospect or the entire 3D cube (see Figure 5).
Conclusions
AVO technology is the leading edge seismic tool in the oil and gas exploration/development community. Exciting changes are currently taking place, including AVO pre-stack elastic inversion for rock property mapping, 3-term inversion for Density volumes and AVAZ (Amplitude versus Angle and Azimuth) for calibration and prediction of fracture spacing and azimuthal direction. Give it a look.
Figure 5
Well Completions
Perforating and testing Pre-frac design Hydraulic fracing Post-frac diagnostics
Free Downloads
Scotia offers at no cost its databases of mergers and acquisitions, oil prices and gas prices. In addition, historical oil and gas price graphs are available for download. All data provided is from public domain information. The databases can be accessed through our website at www.scotia-group.com.
May
OTC, 5-8, Houston AAPG Annual Meeting, 11-14, Salt Lake City SPEE Annual Meeting, 18-20, Charleston
June
AAPL Annual Meeting, 5-7, Denver IPAA Mid-year Meeting, 18-27, Boca Raton SPWLA 44th Annual Symposium, 22-25, Galveston
July
August
September
AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, 21-24, Barcelona
October
SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, 5-8, Denver API Annual Meeting, 19-21, New Orleans GCAGS Conference, 22-24, Baton Rouge SEG International Exposition & Annual Meeting, 26-31, Dallas IPAA Annual Meeting, 27-29, New Orleans
November
GSA Annual Meeting, 2-5, Seattle
Corporate Profile
Scotia is a full service oil and gas advisory firm founded in 1981, employing geologists, geophysicists, engineers, petrophysicists and computer specialists with extensive worldwide experience. Services provided include expert opinion reports, acquisition valuation, exploration analysis, reservoir studies and simulation, research and technology applications, strategic planning and risk analysis, and reserves analysis and property valuation. The firms clients include major and independent oil companies, financial institutions, government agencies, and the legal community. Scotias work for clients has been equally divided between the U.S. (all major producing basins) and international locations including South America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Eastern and Western Europe. To learn more about our firm, we invite you to visit our website at www.scotia-group.com or contact Gene Wiggins in our Houston office or Dave Heather in our Dallas office.
THE SCOTIA GROUP, INC. 363 North Sam Houston Parkway East, Suite 790 Houston, Texas 77060 Phone: 281-448-6188; Fax: 281-448-6189 Dallas, Texas; Phone: 214-987-1042 E-mail: Houston@scotia-group.com Web site: www.scotia-group.com