Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
' .
- .
.
LN3D
BN3
= ~&= & , ,, . . + =. , . . ~ - ~&
0J
N
MB3M
lIt8l [UD1I8DCU Dy 1, 1V10
+YCtty PDUCt8OD, 1V!0
rt9O UIlIOD 1t8l [uO1I8DCU 1VV
+ lrtty /DUCt8OD, lV7V
hCtODU D[tC88IOD, lVd4
DItU IDtC88IOD, 1VdV
Y
. h?8tU hltCrl, 1ODUOD Y1N 31
Lh^ 2VC8l 33lD OltCCl, Cw YCtk, ` 1UU1-22V1
ltIDlCU D ltr3l tIl8ID Dy CCkCt8l [8lD) 1lU
\OnICnI
Ot0wOtd
N
. h0 L!aca! tadtOH
1. h0 dV0Ht OI 0t0m Natxm 1q
1
Otm8! bhIt
^
Q
4
h0matC HHOVatOH
!
1
LOHttat aHd LOHC!uOH Q
1
t0twOtd ICQ
Hd0x I11
CIcWCId
cW wOrds 0rc ncCcss0r tO cXg0n thc OCC0sOn 0nd n0turc O th8
shOrt tcXt. rtn n c0r tgq t w0s dcs_ncd 0s 0n ntrOduObOn tO
8COcCtOn O s08 b V0rOus 0uthOn On mCcnt thcOrsN O LurOgc0n
M0msm. OrtutOus thc cduC0tOn0 gubshn_ hOu whCh h0d
OOmmssOncd ths `m0dcr Oscd tO cXst 8 mOnth 0tcr. hc C0n-
Oc0tOn O thc grO[cCt dcgrVcd thc tcXt O t8 Or_n0 gurgO8c. hcsc
CrCumsnC 0CCOunt Or Ccrt0n O thc 0nOm0 O thc sutc bcOw
thc dO nOt ncCcsr cXCusc thcm. Or thc s0 gubshcd hcm s
COnCcmcd wth thc _cncm COOrdn0m O `cstcm M0msm 0s 0
COmmOn ntctu0 tmduOn t dOcs nOt COnn 0 sgcChC sCmun Or
0 COmg0mtVc cV0u0uOn O 0n O thc g0rtCu0r thcOmtC0 sstcms
wthn t. hs w0s tO bc thc grOVnCc O thc studcs tO whCh t w0s 0
grc0mDc. hcsc wcrc tO COnsttutc 0 scrcs O Crt cXgOsuOns O
c0Ch O thc m0]Or sChOOs Or thcOrsts O ths tr0duOn ~ rOm LuKCs
tO LmmsC b0ruc tO thusscr M0rCusc tO Lc0 YOgc. hc grcscnt
tcXt OCuscd On thc Om0 stmCturcs O thc M0rXsm th0t dcVcOgcd n
thc cst 0tcr thc LCtObcr cVOutOn 0bsns rOm subsntVc
[uO_cmcnts O thc rc0uVc mcrts Or gu0tcs O ts m0n mgrcscnuVcs.
1n 0Ct O COursc thc h0Vc nOt bccn cguV0cnt Or dcnt.
hstOrC0 b00nCc-shcct O thc unt O cstcm M0msm dO% nOt
grcCudc thc ncd Or dsCrmn0tn_ csum0tcs O thc dVcrst O
0ChcVcmcnts wthn t. Lcb0tc OVcr thc mgOssbc hcm s csscnu0
0nd Dtm Or thc Lct.
1[ bcOnd thc g0rtCu0r mOmcnt O ts COmgOsuOn thc tcXt Ws
mOtV0d b mOrc 0sun_ gmOCCug0uOns whCh gcrmt ts gubC0tOn
tOO0 t w0s bcC0usc t mhcCtcO Ccrn grObcms cnCOuntcrcd n thc
COunc O wOrk On 0 sOC0st [Oum0 N:=L:R::e=,OVcr thc _n.
n cs wrttcn n thc 0tc sXtcs Or ths mVcw h0d ucd tO dcmt
. . .
YU
8nd 8n8l8c 8 g8tbCul8t COn_ut8tOn O n8tOn8l Cultutc n n_l8nd
8nCc thc tt8t NOtld 8t.
!
Lnc O t8 gtnCg8l thcmc8 W88 th8t
n_l8h Cultum h8d 8_nhC8ntl l8Ckcd 8n tt8dtOn O `Nc8tcH
m88m n th8 cgOCh ~ 8n 8b8cnCc tc_8tctcd n 8n uncQuVOC8ll
nc_8tVcl_ht. muChOthcWOtkONsLsfRsv|snth8gcrOdW88
dcVOtcd tO 8 COn8COu8 8ttcmgt tO 8t8tt n 8Omc 8cn8c tO tcmcd th8
n8bVc dchCcnC ~ b gubl8hn_ 8nd d8Cu88n_ Otcn Ot thc ht8t
tmc n tt8n thc WOtk O thc mO8t 88lcnt thcOt8t8 tOm LcH8n
t8nCc8nd1t8l.h8gtO_mmmcgut8ucd mcthOdC8llW88 tc8Chn_
t cndb thc c8tl 8cVcnt. O_C8ll 8 COnCludn_ b8l8nCc-8hcct O
thc lc_8C WhCh thc ]OuH8l h8d 8Ou_ht tO m8kc 8V8l8blc n 8n
ot_8nzcd O W88nccdcd. tW88nth8 gct8gcCtVc th8t thc thcmc8
COn8dctcd hctc Wctc hmt cVOlVcd. hc 88 bclOW On 8 `COntncnt8l
U8dtOntOm utOgc 8 thu8 n g8tt 8 8cgucl tO thc c8tlct 8CCOunt o
8n `n8ul8t g8ttcH n n_l8nd. t W88 thc gtOduCt O 8n nCt8n_
8Wcn8 th8t Uc hctt8_c th8t tt8n h8d m88cd tO dcUmcnt
W88 t8clm88n_ n Cctn o thc Cl888Cltt8t8 O h8tOtC8l m8tct8l
8m.A_tc8tct cgut ojud_Cmcnt n 888c88n_ thc n8tOn8lV8t8bOn8
8ndntcH8tOn8l8tcOm88mnth8cgOChW888t8CtCOn8cgucnCc.
umn_ 88 t dd Onc O thc Ccntml COnCcH8 O thc jOutn8l Uc
tcXt W88 d8Cu88cd 8nd CttCzcd b COllc8_uc8 On NsLsRsv|s,
tOm8Wdc mn_c OVcWgOnt8 8hOttl 8tct thc `tc8dct Ot WhCh t
h8d bn Wtttcn W88 8b8ndOncd. n tcVn_ thc tcXt Ot gublC8bOn
h8Vc Ucd tO t8kc 8CCOunt O thct tchcCtOn8 8nd CttC8m8. h8Vc
8l8Ocmcndcd tWhctc thOu_ht lOC8l mgtOVcmcnt8COuld bc m8dc tO
t8 8t_umcnt 8nd _Vcn tcctcnCc8 tO l8tct dcVclOgmcnt8. hc
dOCumcnt th8t tcm8n8 h88 bccn mOdcd 88 8t 88 t8 nttn8C Orm
gctmt8. bnCc t8nt8l COmgO8tOn hOWcVct Cctt8n Ot8cmgh88c8
nOW 8ggc8t tO mc tO gO8c gtOblcm8 th8t 8dmt O nO tc8d 8OlutOn
Wthnthctmt.hc8cm8_Vn_88tc nOt8mcn8blctO8ntcWOtkn_O
thc gcnt c888. hc 8m thctcOtc COn8_ncd tO 8n 8tcOtd WhCh
8ct8 Out mtthct un8n8Wctcd guc8tOn8 Ot 8n cngut ntO thc ututc
O h8tOtC8l m8tct8l8m.
'Components of the NauonaI CuItute', ew 1e evtew o, juIy-August
rq68. Cettain eIements in tbis text wouId be sub[ect to modihcation today.
" Notes in squate btackets ate those which tefet to texts ot events subsequent
to the wung ol the essay.
CtCWCtd tC thC Cutth tdtCn
e
J
P dCCadC atCt ts Ct_nal CCmQCsmCn ths Cssay Cas Ct a CW
suQQCmCntaty nCs. hC CCCCtCn Ct WhCh t Was ntay dCs_nCd
as an nIrOduCtOn aQQCatCd as a sCQatatC bCCk n t;; lc:tcru
crxt:m~ Lrtttccl Jccdcr [L] tCQtntCd n 18j [NCtsC]. hat
vCumC Wth ts dCtalCd studCs C ndvdua thnkCts tCQtCsCnts thC
ntCndCd CCmQanCn and CCnttCl C thC _CnCta sutvCy attCmQtCd hCtC.
hC Cssay Cn LtamsC8 thCCty C hC_CmCny QtCmsCd as a mCtC
QCtsCnal QCndant tO ths tCXt Was QubshCd n cw Jc /vtcw O
CvCmbCt - ]anuaty 1)} as `hC PntnCmCs Ct PntCnO
Lt0msC. hCsC WCtC thC mmCdatC CCmgCmCnts tO Ceai:aiea
eac:tcrn crxt:m.
PmCng thC sQCChC tCHCCtCns Wth WhCh thC tCXt Cnds Was thC
CXQCCtatCn and hCQC th8t MatXst hstCty and QhCsCQh WCuld
CC8sC tC lCad suCh sCQatatC lvCs and statt tC mCCt n a CCmmCn
sCCast CututC n WhCh CaCh tCCk thC ChalCn_C and stmuus C thC
CthCt. hC htst majOt CCCasCn C ths CnCCuntCt Was thC subjCCt C
subsCQuCnt bCCk rgumcnt: wtthtn Lnglt:h J1crxt:m [18C) WhCh
rCVcWs thC CumuatvC WCtk C tdWatd hCmQsCn and thC s_-
nICanCC C ts CttQuC C thC thCu_ht C Cus PthussCt. hC WdCt
QattCtn C dCvClCQmCnt C MatXsm n thC NCst snCC thC md
sCvCntCs havC trCd tC tCsumC n thC lCCtutCs CnttlCd 1atk: Jrccks
0 Jt:t0rtcnl rcrtnlt:m, QubshCd n 18j-a study that 8 nCt
QutC a sCQuCl tC L0n:tdcrctt0n: 0n /c:tcrn crxt:m, snCC ts CCus
nCludCs CuttCnts C thCu_ht tva Ct anta_CnstC tC hstCtCa matCtal-
sm as WC as thC utC C atXsm tsCl. ut t dCCs statt Wth thC
sCCs C CtCCasts WIh WhCh thC CatCt WCtk CCnCudCs and thCn
CCks at hCW thC tCa hstCty ntCCCtual and QCtCa C thC sub-
scQuCnt dCCadC ttCatCd thCm. Many C thCsC QtCdCtCns at_uC havC
bCCn uhCd CthCts s_nhCantly havC nOt. hC CCtutCs dsCuss thC
ditCCtCns and tCasOns C thC Chan_Cs dd nCt CtCsCC and n dCn_
sC makC a numbCt C CttCsms C QattCuat jud_CmCnts C thnkCts
Gt ttadtOns n thC tCXt at hand. Ct tCadCts ntCtCstCd tC QutsuC my
prCsCnt vCW C thC HCd thCn 1a Ihc 1rcck: 0j /t:t0rtccl ctcrtclt:m
C0n bC tCad as a CCntnuatCn C L0n:tdcrctt0n: 0n l/c:tcrn crxt:m
Ct tC_CthCt Wth Zrgumcnt: wtthtn Lnglt:h 1dcrxt:m, thC thtCC studCs
Can bC t0kCn as an unQtCmCdtatCd ttlC_y. LCtCbCt IQ8q
Lorrect revouttono_ theo_ or:ume: _no :hoe ong tn co:e
connectton wtth the rocttco ottvt_ oj o trug mm: ond trug
revouttonory movement.
LL1
1he mutttude mtho:e oj tke o::ton: wtth the mutttude 1
mk not to reod my hook, noy woud rother thot they :mud
utterg negect tt th thot they :houd mt:tnterret tt oer
thrtr ont.
b11LZA
hc \!uCu! radtCn
hc hstOr O M0msm sn b brth 0 ttc OVcr 0 hundd c0n 0_O
h0s ct tO bc Wrttcn. ts dcVcOgmcnt sb rc0bVc brc n sg0n h0s
ncVcrthccss bccn COmgcX 0nd dsg0d. hc us 0nd Oms O b
suCssVc mct0mOrghOs 0nd u0nscrcnC rcm0n 0r_c uncXgOm.
hc mtcd sub[cCt O thc COnsdcr0bOns hc W bc `tcm
M0msm 0 tcm th0t n bc ndt nO gmsc sg0Cc Or bmc. hc
0m O ths brc s0 W thcOrc bc tO stu0tc 0 Ccrt0n bOd O
thcOb WOrk hstOr 0nd tO su__t thc suuCtum COOrdn0t
WhCh dchnc ts unt ~ n Othcr WOrds th0t COnsttutc t dgtc
ntcm0 dVcr_cnC 0nd OggOsuOns 0s 0 COmmOn ntccCtu0
tr0duOn. O dO sO nVOV sOmc nb0 rccrcnCc tO dc grOr cVOubOn
O M0msm bcOrc thc cmcr_cnCc O dc thcOrsts n QutOn Or ths
0Onc W cn0bc us tO scc thc sgcChC nOVct O thc g0ttcm thc
rcgrmt. Pn 0dcgu0tc 8CCOunt O thc WhOc c0rcr rcCOrd O hstOrC0
m0tcr0sm WOud O COunc dcm0nd muCh mOrc cXtcnsVc trc0tmcnt
th0n s gOssbc hcrc. MOWcVcr cVcn 0 summ0r rctrOsgcCuVc skctCh
W hcg tO brn_ subscgucnt shb ntO 0 Cc0r OCus.
hc Oundcn O hstOrC0 m0tcr0sm M0m 0nd Ln_cs Wcrc bOm
n thc hnt dcC0dc 0tcr thc 0gOcOnC 0rs. M0O [11-8]) W0s thc
sOn O 0 0Wcr n rcr Ln_cs [1zO) O 0 m0nu0Cturcr n
0mcn: bOth Wcrc hnc0ndcrs b Or_n rOm grOsgcrOus bOur_cOs
b0Ck_rOunds n thc mOst 0dV0nCcd 0nd Wtcr rc_Ons O Lcm0n.
hcr c 0nd WOrk st0mgcd On gubC mcmOr nccd ttc hc0n0
hcrc. t s Wc knOWn hOW undcr thc _r0Vt0ttOn0 gu O thc hrst
grOct0r0n ugsur_ 0tct thc ndusu0 rcVOuuOn M0O n hs twcnu
grO_rcssVc scttcd hs 0CCOunts Wth Uc ghOsOghC0 @0C O
M
HegeI and leuerbach, and the poIiucaI theory ol Proudhon, wiIe
EngeIs dscovered the reaIiues ol the workingcIass condition in
EngandanddenouncedtheeconomicdoctrinesthatIegitimatedithow
the to te the Commaois: m:fes:o on the eve ol the great
conunentaI upheavaI ol1q and lought on theexuemeIelt ank ol
the inteationaI revoIts olthat year, lor the cause olrevoIuuonary
sociaIism how they were hunted by a victorious counterrevoIution
into eiIe in EngIand in their thirues how Man drewthe historicaI
baIance-sht olthe lrench revoIution that had ended in the econd
Empire,whiIe EngeIssummedup thaolthelaiIureolthecontempor
aneous German revoIuuon how Man, aIone in London, in etreme
penury,embarkedonthemonumenta|heomucaItaskolreconstructing
the capitaIis mode olproducuon as a whoIe, aided onIy by the in
teIIectuaI and materiaI soIidrity olEngeIs in Manchter how alter
hlteen years olIabour, the hrst voIume ol Caital as pubIished just
belore Manreached theageolhltyhowtowards theend olthesame
period,heparticipatedintheloundationoltelirstnteaonaI,and
theninvested themostintenseeortinIeadingipmctiIworkas8
organied sociaIist movement how he commemorated the Paris
Commune, and insuucted the newIy unied Germanworkers' party,
estabIishingthegeneraIprincipIes olaluture proIetarianstate hoin
theIast years olMa's Iileand alter his death, EngeIs produced the
rst systemauc epositions ol historicaI materiaIism that made it a
popuIarpoIiticaIlorceinEurope,andinhissevenuespresidedoverthe
growth ol the Second nteationaI, in which it became the ociaI
doctrineolthmorworking-cIassparties olthe Conunent.
he enormous achievement ol these interwoven Iives is not our
directconcehere. lorourpuoses, it wiIIbe enoughtoemphasie
certainsoc/a| haIImarksolthetheoreucaIworkolManandEngeIs,that
may see as a sndard olcomparison lor Iater deveIopments. Man
and EngeIs were isoIated pioneers within their ow generauon no
contemporary olanynationaIitynbesaidto have IIyunderstood
or shared their mature views. At the same time, their worwas the
productolaIongointendeavour,an inteIIectuaIpartnershipwithout
anycIoseparaIIeI inthe history olthought to this day. The o men
together- through eiIe, impovishmentand ddgery- neverost
contactwiththemaorstggIesoltheproIetiatoltheirmedespite
7\e Clmsi:al 1rc|tt0n
Q
theirvirtuaIIycompIeteIackolanyorganizauonaIbondwithitlorover
adecade. Jhe depth olthehistoricaI connecuon between thethought
olMan and ngeIs and the evoIuuon olthe working cIass was best
provedbytheveryordeaIoltheyears lrom t 8oonwardswhenthey
were both appareny lorced ack in private' existence the period
was used by Man with the consnt materiaI aid olngeIs lor the
preparauon olCaital, and ended with his naturaI coopuon into the
lirstntaonaIwhisoon bamea pracuI Ieademhip olit n
theotherhandtheordinyunityoltheoryandpmcuceachieved
againstaIIadvemiuesintheIivesolM andngeIswasbythesame
tokenneveranunbrokenorimmediateidenuty.JhesingIerevoIuuon
upheavaIinwhichtheypersonaIIyparucipatedwaspredominantIy
arusan and peasant in i mass chamcter the uny Gean proIeriat
pIayed onIy a smaII roIe in the events olI88. Jhe mostadvanced
sociaIinsurrecuonwhichtheywitnessedlroalarwasIikewisemainIy
arusanaI in chamcter the Paris Commune deleat ensured the
dissoIution ol the lirst ntemationaI and the retum ol Man and
ngeIs to mereIy inlormaI poIiucaI activity once again The reaI
emergence olindusuiaI working cIass parues occurred alter Man's
deathJhereIauonshipbetweenMan'stheoryandproIerianpractice
was thus aIways uneven and mediate there was very mreIy a dimct
coincidencebetweenthetwo.JhecompIexityoltheobecuvearucuIa
uonbetweencIass and'science'inthisperiodstiIIvirtuaIIyunstudied
todaywas inturn reected inthe nature and late olMan's writings
themseIves lortheIimioltheworkingcIass movement olthetime
set certain boundaries to the work olMan and EngeIs his can be
seen at two IeveIs- both in thereceptionand thescopeoltheirtexts
Man's theomticaI inuence in the suict sense rmained reIativeIy
resuicted in his own Iile The greater buIk olhis wriungs - at Ieast
threequarters olthem - Iay unpubIished when hedied whathe had
pubIished was scattered haphazardIy over a number olcounuies and
Ianages without being avaiIabIeas a whoIe in any olthem.t was
" 5 Theodore Hamerow, ertoroton evomton eocton rinceton t y 8,
pp t y}-6 thebsthistoricalanalysis oIthesocial composion oIthe German
Revolution oIt 88
" Among the works unpublishd in mX8 own liIetime wre Lrtgue oj
/eger horophy o_ght (t 8y 1conomu-mropu onurcrgU (t 8
tobeanotherhaIlcenturybeoreaIIhismajororksereinthepubIic
domain,andthehistryoltheirposthumousappearanceastolora
centraI suand in the Iater cissitud ol Manism. Jhe register ol
Man'spubIicauons inhison timeisanindex olthe barriers to the
dihusion olhis thought among the cIass to hom it as addressed.
ConverseIy,hoever,theinexperienceoltheproIetariatoltheepoch
stiII haIlay beteen orkshop and lactory, IargeIy devoid een l
uadeunion organizauon, ithout hope olinning poer anyhere
in urope rcumscribed the outer Iimits olM's thought itseI
undamenmIIy, Man Ielt behind him B coherent and deveIoped
ecanamictheoryolthecapitaIistmodeolproducuon,setoutinCqital,
but nocomparIepalial theory me scres olthe bourgeois
State orolme suategyand tacu olrevoIutiona sociaIist sggIe
by aorkingcIassparty loritsoverto. At mos hebequeathed a
lecrypticanucipauonsinthet 8osandIaconicprincipIesinthe t 8os
dictatorshipolheproIetariat'),togemerimhislamousconjunctumI
anaIyses oltheSecondmpire. nthisresect, Man'sorkcouIdnot
outmn the reaI historicaI pace olmemasses, in theinvenuon oltheir
oninstrumentsandmodaIiesolseIlemancipauonAtthesametime,
and this as a more obvious Iacuna to contemporari, Man never
provided any extended generaI account olhistoriI materiaIism a
such. JhisasthetaskthatngeIstookupintheIate t 8osand t 88os,
iththeXot/-Dar/oy anditssequeIs,inresponsetothegromolne
orking-cIass organizationson theconunent. or thehnaI paradool
mehistoricaIreIationshipolmetheoreticaIorkol Manandnge|sto
thepracticaIstruggIesoltheproIetariatIayinthedistinctivelormolits
intemationaIism. either manaseverrooted in a nationaI po|iticaI
party alr t 8q8. ased in ngIand, here they remained Iargey
outside the IocaI cuIturaI and poIicaI lrameork, both consciousIy
decidedagainstretumingtoGermanyinthe 86os,heneithercouId
have done so. Abstaining lrom any direc roIe n the bui|ding o
nationaI organiations ol the orking-cIass in the major indusaI
countries, they advised and guided miIitants and Ieaders throughout
uropeandortAmer.JheircorrepondeneextendedeortIessIy
7/etet on euerbac (t8q) 7/e German Jeologj {i8q6) GranJre {i8-8)
7eoriet o]5urplut- alue (i86z~) Capitalols II md III Critiqae o]tGotha
roram {i8]Aote on aner {i88o].
7eCs/:m2rad/an
fromMoscoto Chicago, and apIes to sIo Jheve narroness
andimmaturityoftheorng-cIassmovementoftheepochpermitted
them to reaIie, at a prie, a pumr intemationaIism than as to be
possiIe thentphaseofideveIopment
Jhegroup oftheoristshosucceededMandngeIsin thegenera-
uonafterthemassuIImaIIi nnumbertascomprisedofmenho
for the mst partetohistoriI materiaIism reIauveIyIate in their
personaI deveIopment Jhe for maor es of this period e
LabrioIa o in t 8), ehng o in t 86), autsky o in
8) and PIekhanov o in t 86)AIIere from the morebak-
ard astem or Southem regionsofuroe Mehringas the son of
aunkerfromPomenia, PIeano ofaIandoner fromJambov,
LabrioIa ofa Iandoner from Lampania, autsy ofa painter from
ohemia PIhano as onverted to Masm, after a dede of
cIandestine arodnik acuvity, in eIe in SiterIand in the t 88os
LabrioIaanestabIishedegeIianphiosopherin Kome,homoved
overtoMism in t 8goMehringhadaIongcamerasaIiberaIdemo-
ct and pubIcst n Pssa, before oining the German SociaI-
emocratic arty in t 8gt autsky aIone had no preMast past,
entering the orkem' movement as a sociaIist ouaIist in his earIy
tenties one oftheseinteIIectuaIsere to pIaya centI roIe in the
Ieadership of the nationaI parues oftheir country, but hey ere aII
cIoseIy integated into their poIiucaI and ideoIogicaI Iife and heId
ociaIpositionsin them,iththeeceptinofabriIaho remained
aIooffrom the foundauon ofthe taIian SociaIist arty Iekhano
afterheIpingtofoundtheGroupforthemancipauonofabour,as
on thehmtditoriaIbod of sraandtheCenraI Commiteeofthe
Kussian SociaIemocuc Labour arty eIected at its Secod
Longress autsky as editor ofO/eAee Ze/t, hich became the
" estein (8 yyz), inteIIectuaIIy a minor gure,beIonged to the sae
generationMorris (t 8 yq6),oIderthananyol thisgroup,was olmuchgreater
signicance, butunustlyremained withoutmuch inuenceeen within his on
couny, and wasunownoutsideit.
LabrioIa had been insuumental in urging Turati towards e creation ol a
sociaIistpartinItaIy,onthe GermanmodeI,butattheIastminutedecidedotto
arcipateinthelondingcongressol eP5Iat Genoa n 8y, becauseol his
eseaons aboutiideologic claty
maintheoreucaIorganolthSPO nddraltedtheociaIprogme
the pty at the rlurt Congress. Mehring as a prominent con-
ibutor t Oie Aeae Zeit, LabrioIa to its lrench counterpart Le
Oeeim.AIIlourmnpemonaIIycoespondedithngeIs,ho
asa loauveinhuence on them. Jhe main direction oltheirork
L beseen, in lact,as a conunuation olngeIs's on hnaI period. n
othe ords, they ere concmed in diherent ays to jstemaie
hstoricaI materiaIism 8 a comrehensiv theory ol man and nature,
capabIe ol repIacing riva bourgeois iscipIines d providing the
orkers'movementithabroadandcoherentisionoltheorIdthat
couIdeasiIygraspedbyitsmiIitants. JhistasinvoIved them,as it
haddone lorngeIs, ina toloId commitment toproduce generaI
phiosophiaIstatementsolMarxismasaconcepuonolhisto,and to
etenditintodomainsthathadnotbeendirectIytouchedbyMan.Jhe
simiIarity ol the utIes olsome ol their main expositions indicates
their common proccupations OnHistari:aIateriaIm Mehring,
Essajs an tke aterimis Can:epti a] Histarj LabrioIa), 7ke
OeveIapmen a] tke anist Can:eptian a] Hista PIekhanov), 2ke
ateriaIist Can:eptian a] Htarj Kautsky. At the same time,
MeingandPIekhanovroteessaysonIiteratureandart(2keZssing
Legen1and Xrta:iaIL), hiIe Kautsky turned a study ol
reIigion (2ke Urs a] Ckristiai) aII themes hich the Iater
ngeIshadbrieyprobedJhe generaI sense oltheseorks as that
ola compIetion, more than a deveIopment, olMarxsheritage. Jhe
srt olschoIarIy pubIicauon olMan's manuscripts and biographcaI
studyolhisIile,iththe intenuon olrecoveringanddspIayingthem
in luIIto the sociaIistmovementlorthehrsttime,aIsobeIongsto this
generation. ngeIs had pubIished the Second and Jhird oIumes ol
tapim, Kautsky then edited the 2kearies a]arpIas-aae, Mehring
subsequentIy coIIaborated in the pubIication ol the ar-Enge/s
Carrespand:n:e, and at the end olhis Iile he produced the hrst maor
biogphy ol Man. Systematiauon and recapituIauon ol an in-
Mehringsessay was pubIished in t 8yy, PIekhanov's in t 8y, LabrioIa's in
t 8y6. Kautskys eatise, onalarIargerscaIe,waspubIishedmuchIater,in t y.
Thesetextswere writtenrespectiveIyin t 8yyMehring), t y8autsky)and
t yt ty (PIekhanov ).
` Lopto oI. II appeared in t 88 , and oI. III in t 8y6 /neoruz ojurpz
oze lrom t y Lorrerpodence in t yt y Mehin'sJor orx t t
T: Clral Ta Q
heritance stiII very ne and cIose behind theme the predominant
aims olthesesuccessors.
MeanhiIe, hoever, the hoIe internationaI cIimate ol orId
capitaIism as aItering. n the Iast years ol the nineteenth century,
thereasasharpeconomic upsingin themaorindustiaI countries,
asmonopoIizaontookgripathomeandimperiaIistepansionacceIer
ated abroad, inauguting a tense era ol impetuous technoI ogicaI
innoation, rising mtes olproht, increasing accumuIation olcapitaI,
and escaIating miIitary rivaIry beteen the great poers. These
obectiveconditions ereverydierentlrom thecomparativeIytran
quiI phase olcapitaIist deveIopment during the Iong recession lrom
t 8 to t 8gq, alter the deleat olthe Commune and belore the hrst
outbreakolinterimperiaIistconhictsin theAngIooer and Spanish
merican Wars soon loIIoed by the Kussoapanese War. The
immediate heirs olMan and ngeIs had been lormed in a period ol
mIatie IuII. The net generation olMarxists came olage in a much
ore turbuIent environment, as European capitaIism began to scud
toardsthe tempest olthelirstWorId War. The theoreticians olthis
Iev ere much more numerous than their redecessors and th
conrmed stiII more dramaticaIIy ashiltthathadaIreadystarted tobe
isibIe in the previous period - the translerence ol the hoIe geo
graphicaI aisolMarist cuIturetoardsEastern and entraI Erope.
The dominant hgures olthenegeneration cae ithoutecetion
lromrgionseastolerIin. Leninastheson olaciviI servantlrom
Astraan,LemburgthedaughterolatimbermerchantromaIica,
Trotsky the son ol a larmer lrom the raine, Ilerding ol an
insurance lunctionar and auer ola tetiIemanlactrer in Atria
AIIoltheserotemaororksbelorethelirstWorIdWar. ukarin,
thesonolateacherinMosco,andPreobrazhensky,hoselatheras
a priestlrom re, made their mark alter it, butcan be considered as
Iaterproducts olthesame lormation The dating and distribution ol
thedeveIopmetolMarxisttheoryuptothispointcanthusbetabuIated
as loIIos
Man
ngeIs
t 8t 8t 88
t 8t 8g
Trier KhineIand
armen WestphaIia
8
LabrioIa
Mehring
autsky
PIekhano
Lenin
Luxemburg
iIlerding
Jroky
aue
Preobhensky
ukharin
t 8q-t goq
t 8q6-t gtg
t 8q-t g8
t 86-t gt 8
t 8t g
t 8t-tgtg
t 8-tgqt
t 8gtgq
t 88ttg8
t 886-t g
t 888tg8
Cassino Campania
SchIaePomerania
Prague ohemia
Jbo CentraI Kussia
Simbirsk VoIga
osc GaIicia
Vina
herson Ukraine
Vinna
reI CentraI Kussia
Mosco
VirtuaIIy aII the younger genetion ol theoris ere to pIa a
commandingpartintheIeadershipoltheirrespecuvenauonaIparues
aroIelarmorecentraIandactivethanthatoltheirpredecesso.Lenin,
olcourse,asthecreatoroltheoIshevikPartyinKussiaLuxemburg
astheguidinginteIIectltheSociaIOemocraucPartyinPoIand,and
Iater the most authoritauve lounder ol the Communist Party ol
Germy. Jrotsky as a centI gure i n the laconaI disputes ol
KussianSociaIOemocracy, and ukharinarisingIieutenantolLenin,
belore the lirst WorId War. auer headed the secretariat ol the
parIiamenta group oltheAustrian SoaIOemocrauc Party, hiIe
iIlerdingbecameaprominenteichstagdeputyoltheGermanSociaI
Oemocrauc Party. A common leature olthis hoIe group as the
exordinaryprecoctyoltheireveIopment everysingIe one olthe
hguresjustmentioned had ritten abasic theoreucaIorkby theend
oltheir tenues.
What ere the ne departures hich their riung represented
OeteinedbythequickeningolthehoIehistoricaI tempolrom the
tuolthecenturyonards, theirconcemsIayessenuaIIyintonoveI
diruons. irstIy,themanilestansloations olthecapitaIist mode
ol production that had generated monopoIiation and imperiaIism
demandedsustainedeconomic anaIysis and expIanation. M'sork
no,moreover,comingunderprolessionaIcriticismlromademic
T/e CIas/:aI 7rad/t/an
economistslorthehrsttime CaptaIcouIdnoIongerbesimpIyrested
onithadtodeveIoped.Jhehrstmaorattemptinthisdirctionas
actuaIIyundertaken by Kautsky, th hisXrar|an Qaest|an in gg,a
seeping categoraI expIoation ol the changes in uropean and
AmericanagricuIturehichsuggested thatheasnothememberol
the oIder generauon most sensitive to the nds olthe contemporary
situation, and seaIed his authorityamong younger Maists. Later i
the same year, Lenin pubIishd Tke OeveIapment afCap|taI|sm n
s-amassivestudyolamIeconomy,hoselormaIinspirauo
was ery cIose to that olthe Zgrar/an Qaest|an, but hose specic
obecuveasinsomeaysboIderandmomnoveI orthisorkas,
ehect, the hmt serous appIication ol the geneI theory ol the
pitaIist mode olproduction set out in Cap|taI to a concmte sociaI
lormation, combininga numberolmodes olproduction in aarticu
IatedhistoricaItotaIity.Lenin'sinvestigationoltheJsristcountryside
muspmsetedacriucaIadvancelorhistoricaImateriaIismasahoIe
heastentyninehenhecompIeteditbD yearsIater,HiIlerding
ho had on his spurs in t goq ith an eecuve mpIy to hm
aerk's marginIist critiqe ol Ma hnished his pathbmng
studyolF/nr:eCap/ta,attheage oltentyeightPubIishedin tgto,
Ilerding's orkentbeyondeitherasectoI'oranationaI'appIi
tion olCap/taI, such as had been achieved by Kautskyand Lenin, to
present a luIIsca|e updating' ol it, to take account ol the gIobaI
changes inthecapitaIistmodeolproductionassuch,intheneepoch
oltrusts, taris and tradears Centringhis anIysis onthe groing
ascendancy olbanks, the acceIerating hmst ol monopoIiation, and
the incmasing use olste machinery lor the aggressve epansion ol
capitaI, HiIlerding stressed the moutng internationaI tension and
anarchy that as the concomitant olthe tghtening organiaton and
, ritten i n 1Q1[]
hiIe in the
loIIoingearenin pubIishedhis lamousshortstudyJmperim/sm-
7keH/kesttqe ]CapitaIm, hich both provided a descriptive
summary ol the common economic concIusions ol the preceding
debate, and lor the hrst timelramed them ithin a coherent poIiicaI
anaIysisolimperiaIistbeIIicismandcoIoniaIexpIoitation,derivedlrom
the generaI Ia ol unen deveIopment ol the capitaIist mode ol
production.
hehrstdecadeandahaIlolthecenturythussaagreathorescence
olMarst economicthought in Germany, Ausuia and Kussia. very
major theorist ol the ume too lor granted the vitaI importance ol
"" uharin Iater aIso ubIshed his own extended critique ol Luxemburg'
theory, in Ig1qj thistexthas recentIy beenansIatedntoEngIish n K. Tarbuc
(ed.),meromm mthe Mccumuoton ojLoto ondon Ig}I.
7e C/ass/:a/ 1rodtrt0n 11
deciphering the ndamentaI Ias olmotion olcapitaIism in its ne
stageolhistoricaIdeveIopment At the same time, hoever themas
aIso a meteoric emergence ol a Maistpa//t/ca/ theory lor the hrst
time Whereas theonomicstudiesoltheperiodcouId buiIddirectIy
on the imposingoundations olCap/ta/, neither Ma norngeIs had
beeath y compaIe corpus ol concepts lor the poIiticaI
stmtegy d tactics ol me proIetarian revoIution Jheir objective
situauon8ehavesnprIudedthis.Jhempidgrotholorking
cIass paruesin LentmIuropeandthestormyriseolpopuIarrebeIIions
against the ancien rgim olastern urope no created the con
ditions lor ane type oltheory based directIy on massstmggIesol
theproIetariat and integmted naturaIIyintopar organiations. Jhe
KussinKevoIuuonoltQO[ cIoseIyatchedthroughoutGermanyand
Austria produc the rst stratg poIiticaI anaIysis ol a scientihc
type in the history ol Maism Jrotskys Resats 1 Praspecs.
GroundedinamarkabIeinsightintothestmcture olthestatesystem
olorIdimperiaIismthisshortorkIaiddonith briIIiantaccuracy
the luture chamcter and course olthe sociaIist revoIution in Kussia
WrittenbyJrotsyattheageoltenty-sevenitas notloIIoedby
any lurther contribution ol importance lrom him belore the irst
WorIdWargiven hisisoIation lrom theoIshevikParty alter tQOy.
Jhe stemat/c constrction ol a Maist poIiticaI theory ol cIass
sggIe,attheorganizauonaIandtacticaIIeveI,astheorkolenin
Jhe scaIe olhisaccompIishmenton this pIane tnslormed thehoIe
architecture olhistoricaI materiaIism, permanentIy elore enin, the
poIiucaI domain propr as viuaIIy unexpIored ithin Maist
theory.nthespaceolsometentyyea,hecreatedtheconceptsand
methodsnecessarylortheconductolasuccsIproIetarianstmggIe
forpoerin Kussia, Ied bya skiIIed and devotedorkersparty. he
specihcays olcombining propaganda and agitauon, Ieading strikes
and demonsuations, lorging cIass aIIianc cementing party organ
izationhandIingnationaI seIl-determination interetingintemaIand
intemationaI conjunctures, situatng types oldeviauon, using parIia
mentaryork,pmparinginsurrectionaryassauIt aIItheseinnovations
olten sn as simpIy pracucaI measures, in lact aIso represented
disive te//ectaa/ advances into hitherto uncharted terin kat /s
ta ls Oane, One 5tep Faar1 7a 5teps Bmk, 7wa 7act/cs a]
@
5ac/al-Oemacrj, 7keLessansa]tkeascaw Upr/ng, 7keZgrar/
Pragrme a] Rms/a ac/al-Oecracj, 7ke R/gkt a] Aat/a ta
eOeterm/na/an 8ll thcc 8nd 8 hundtcd Othct `OCC88On8l`
8ttClc8 Ot 888 bcOtc thc tmt NOtld N8t n8u_ut8tcd 8 m8tX8t
8CcnCc O gOlt hcnCcO8td C8g8blc O dc8ln_ Wth 8 V88t mn_c
O gtOblcm8WhCh h8d gt0Ou8ll8nOut8dc 8n t_OtOu8 thcmtC8l
[ut8dCtOn. hc gOWct Ocnn8 WOtk n thc c8m W88 O COumc
mg8ttcd tO t b thc mmcn8c tcVOlutOn8t cnct_ O thc u888u
m888c8undctthcl_htO 88t8m.Lnlthctclcmcnt8l8gOnt8ncu8
gt8CtCc gtc88n_ cVct ClO8ct tOW8td8 thc OVctthtOW O u888n
b8Olut8m tcndctcd gO88blc thc_tt cnl8t_cmcntO m88t thcOt
8ChcVcd b cnn.
o88tl tOO t W88 OnCc 8_8n thc tc8l m8tct8l COndtOn8 O
8 ntcllcCt8l d8COVct WhCh dctcHncd t8 Ob[cCtVc bOund8tc8.
hcm 8 nO 8g8Cc hctc tO d8Cu88 thc lmtOn8 8nd OVct8_ht8 O
cnn8WOtk. t C8n mctcl88dth8tthc8c Wctc 8ll b88C8ll tcl8tcd
tOthcg8ttCul8tb8CkW8tdn8Othcu888n8OC8lOtm8tOn 8nd thc
btchCh _OVcHcd t 8nd WhCh 8ct thc 88t8t Lmgtc OhtOm thc
tc8t O gW8r utOgc. cnn 8t mOtc dgl tOOtcd n 8 n8tOn8l
WOtkct8 mOVcmcnt th8n m8m h8d cVct bccn W88 nOt drcCtl COn-
CctncdWththc ncCc888tl d8tnCt mcWOtkO8ttu__lccl8cWhctc n
thc COntncnt WhCh W88tOm8kc thctO8d tO tcVOlutOn gu8lt8tVcl
mOtcdmCultth8n nu888t8cl. hu8nLctm8nndu8tt8ll muCh
mOtc8dV8nCcdunVct88lm8lc8uhm_c8nd CVClbcttc8h8dCtc8tcd 8
gutcd8tnCt 8t8tc8UuCtutctOm thc Om8nOV 8utOCt8C 8nd hcnCc 8
gOltC8lb8ttlc-hcld th8t ncVct ClO8cl tc8cmblcd th8t O u888. hctc
thc tcmgct O thc Ot_8nzcd WOtkn_ Cl888 W88nOt8bl lc88tcVOlutOn-
8tWhlc8tthc88mctmct8CultutcW88COn8dct8blmOtcdcVclOgcd
tO_cthct Wth thc n8ttutOn8l mcWOtk O thc WhOlc 8OCct.
uXcmbut_ thc Onc m8m8t thnkct n mgct8l Lctm8n tO gtOduCc
8n Ot_n8l bOd O gOltC8l thcOt 8u__c8tVcl tchcCtcd th8 COn-
U8dCtOn n hct OWn WOtk ~ 8lthOu_h t W88 8lW88 8l8O g8tt8ll
nOtmcdb hctcXgctcnCcOthcmuChmOtcn8ut_cnt Ol8hundct-
_tOund mOVcmcnt O thc tmc. uXcmbut_8 gOltC8l Wttn_8 ncVct
8tt8ncd thc COhctcnCc Ot dcgth O thO8c O cnn Ot thc Otc8_ht O
thO8c O tOt8k. hc8Ol Othc Lctm8n mOVcmcnt ddnOt gct 8
COmg8t8blc_tOWth. ut uXcmbut_8 g888On8tc ntctcntOn8 Wthn
7e C|ass/:a7raJt t
Q
the SO against its groing sIide toas relormism (hose extent
enin i n exiIe notaby laiIed to perceive nevertheIess contained
eIements olacritique olcapitaIistdemocracy, a delence olproIetarian
spontaneity, and a conceptionolsociaIistIiberty thatereinadvance
olLenin'saamnessolmeseissu,inhermorecompIexenvironment.
5/al R]rm r Rlat/n, the tnchant poIemic with hich she
repIiedtoemstein'sevoIuuonismattheageoltentyeight,Iaunched
er on her distnctive course successive theorizations olthe generaI
strkeas thearchetaI aggressiveeapon olthesel-emancipationol
the working cIass loI Ioed, reaching their concIusion in a lateluI
debate ith Kautsky in 1QOQ~to in hich the basidividingIinesol
lureorking-cIasspoIiticserehnaIIydmn.
orthe irstWorId Warastopart the mnks olManist theory in
LuropeasmdicaIIyasitspIitthe orking-cIass movementitseI Jhe
whoIedeveIopmentolMarxismintheIastdecadesbeloretheWarhad
reaIized a much cIoser unity oltheory and practice than in the pre-
ceding period, because olthe ascent olthe oganized sociaIistparties
olthe time. he integration othe eading Marist theorists int the
practice ol their nationaI parties did not, hoever, provinciaie or
segreatethemlromeach other mecontrary, internationaI debate
andpoIemiceresecondnaturetothemilnoneachievedtheoIympian
universaIism olMan orEnges, thisas a necessary consequence ol
their more concrete racination i n the particuIar situation and e ol
theircounties - mediated,i nthecaseol teKussiansandtheoIes,by
IongspeIIsolexieabroad,recaingthoseolteloundersolhistoricaI
materiaIism Withintheneconditionsoltheepoch,theyneverthe
Ie lormed a reIativeIy homogeneous medium ol discussion and
communication,inhichtheIeadingritersolthemaindetachmentsol
theSecondntauonaIintheEasternandCentraIEuropeancountries,
whereManismasnoconcentratedasaIiingtheory,kneoleach
other's ork at rst or second hand, and cticism respected no
11
omeidea oltheRussianemigrationissuggestedbythecountriesinwhich
Lenin, Trotsk and uharin Iived or trave| |ed beore Ig1! They inc|uded
Germany EngIand, rance, eIgium, iterIand and Austria (enin and
rotsk)ItaIandPoIand(Lenin)Rumaniaerbia,uIgaria,pain (Trotsk)
rotskznd uhn) enmar, or zndweden (ukharin).
lrontiers. Jhus hen Warbroke out in 1Qtq, the scission over it mn
through mther than beteen the various nationaI contingents ol
Manist theorists ho had dominated he parcene. ltheoIdr
genemtion, Kautsky and Iekhanov cIamorousIy opted lor sociaI
chauvinism and support lor their respective opposing imperiaIist
latherIandsMehring,ontheotherhand,steadlastIyrelusedtohaveany
tck ith the capiIation ol the SO in Geany. Among th
youngergeneration, Lenin, Jrotsky, Luxemburg and ukharin ung
themseIves into aII-outresistance to the War and denunciation olme
betmyaI olthecontendingsociaI-democmticorganizaonswhich had
ranged themseIves behind theircIass opprsors in thIong-predicted
hoIocaustolcapitaIism.iIlerding,hohadinitiaIIyopposedtheWar
in the Keichstag,soonaIIoed himseIlto be dralted intotheAustrian
ArmyauerpromptIyraIIiedlorseicagainstKussiaonthLaste
lront, here he as quickIy captred. Jhe unity and reaIity olth
Second ntemationaI, cherished by LngeIs,as destroyed in aeek.
Jhe continentaI consequences olAugust 1Q1q are eII knon. n
Kussia, a spontaneous rising ol hungry and ar-eary masses in
etrorad toppIed Tsarism in ebra tt. Within eght months
theoIshevikartyunderLeninsIeadershipasreadytoseizepoer.
n ctober Jrots mahaIIed it in etrograd lor the SociaIist
revoIution hehad loreseen eIve years earIier. Jesilt victory ol
ttassoonloIIoed byimperiaIist bIockade, interventionand the
civiI ar olt t 8z t. Jhe epic course olthe Kussian KevoIution in
theseears lound i ts theoreticaI compass in theritings olenin, in
hompoIiticaI thoughtandacon nolused intoa quicened unity
ithoutprecedentorsequeI. lromtheXpr|l 7kesesthroughtaed
Fevolai|oa and A|sm aad Iasareci|oa to Je-B|ag Commaaism
and 7ke 7 / A/d, Lenins orks olthese years estabIished ne
nos ithin historicI materiaIism - the concrete anaIsis ol a
concrete sitaton hich he caI|ed the Iiving souI ol Manism
acquingsuchadynamiclorcein themthatthetermLeninismassuch
came into use shortIy aleards n this heroic perod ol the pro-
Ietarian revoIution in Kussia, ol course, the rapid deveIopment ol
Marxist theoy as by no means conned to Lenins o ork.
rotskyrotendamentaItextsontheartolar{HawtkeReraIa/a
Zrme1Jtse)and thedtinyolIiterature(L/teratare 1ReraIt/a).
7\e Cls`cal !ad t
ukharinattemptedtosummarizehistoricaImateriaIism8 asystematic
socioIogyinawideIydiscussedtreatise(Tkeory o( H|s:r|cal aer|al-
ism). ShortIy aars, reobrhensky, with whom he had
coIIabomtedonthepopuIaroIshevikmanuaI 7\e XBC o( Comman|sm,
sta to pubIish the most originaI and radicaI economic study ol
thetasksbeloretheSovietStatei nthensitiontowardssociaIism a
eId hitherto natumIIy untrespassed by Manisttheory the rst parts
oltheNwEconom|:s appeared in t zq At the same time, the inter
naonaIcentre olgravity olthe historicaI schoIamhip devoted to the
discove and editing ol Man' s unpubIished writings shilted to
Kussia. Kyazanov, who aIready belore the irst WorId Wa had
stabIished his reputation lor arhivaI research on Ma, now took
chargeoltherstcompIeteandscienticedition oltheorksolMan
ndLngeIs,thebuIkolwhosemanuscriptsweretranslerredtoMosco
nddepositedintheMarxLngeIsnstituteolwhichhehadbecomethe
director AII these men heId, ol course, prominent positions in the
ractica stggIe lor the tumph othe revouio in ussia, and in
the constction olthe ascent Soviet state Ouring the CiviI War,
Lenin was haian te ounciI oepIes mmissars, rtsky
wasCommissar lorWar, ukharinwaseditroltheartnewsaer,
reob
KeIeasedlromimprisonmentwiththecoIIapse
olthe Second Keich, uxemburg immediateIy threwherseIlinto the
task ol organizing the revoIutionary Ielt in Geany as the most
authoritative gure in the loaon olthe a month Iar, she
wrotetheprogrammeolthepartyanddeIivered the poIicaIportat
itsloundingConlerence.oeeksIater,she assassinatedhena
conlused,semispontaneousrisingstartedamongstthelamishederIin
crods was put don by the lreiorps at the behest ol a SociaI-
Oemocmucgovement.Jherepressionoltheanuaryinsurrectioni n
erIinassoonloIIowedbythemIitaryreconquestolMunichbythe
Keichsehr, alter IocaI sociaIistandcommunistgroupshadcreated an
ephemeI avarian Soviet KepubIic there in ApriI. Jhe Gean
KevoIuuon bo olthe orers and soIdiers' counciIs olovember
1Q1 had been decisiveIydeleated by 1QzO.
MeanhiIe, in the AusoHungarianLmpire, a comparabIe patte
oleventshad unloIded.n themorebackard ruraIstateolHungary,
Lntente demands had Ied to thevoIuntaryabdicationolthebourgeois
govement set up alter the Armistice, and the briel creation ol a
Soiet KepubIic under j oint SociaIemocrauc and Communist
eadship six months Iater, Kumanian oops had suppressed the
Hungarian Commune and restored a hite rgime. n Austria, the
objective weightoltheindustriaIoringcIassasmugreaterthan
^
" Her essay, 1 Rattn Relation written |n t yt 8, was rst pubIished by
PauI Levi in yzz
7e C|as/:a| 7rm/n t_
in ungary as it had been inrussia compared to avaria, but the
SociaI-Oemocmtic arty unchaIIenged in its command ol the
I oyaIues ol the proIetariat opted against a sociaIist revoIuuon,
enteringinsteadintoaboueoiscoaIiuongovernment,andgmduaIIy
dismantIing the orke' d soIdier' counciIs lrom above, on the
ptt olavoidingLntente inteenuon y tQzo ithad abandoned
the govement, but capimIist resiIizauon as by then assured.
auer, h soon bOe the dominant gure ithin the
SO,
seedasoreign Minister olthe KepubIicin tQ t Q and subsequentIy
rtethemajortherecaIdelenceolthepartysrecordalterthear,
a oIume miscaIIed 7ke Zastr/ R|at/n, in tQzq. is loer
oIIeae iIlerding, meanhiIe,astice to be Minister ofinance
inthe WeimarKepubIic.Jheunityoltheoryandpmcticecharacteisic
ofthisgenemtionassustainedeven intheloistranksofAustro
anism.
Two od:er prominent economists, one an ex-Marxist and the otber a critic
of Manism, beId govementaI posts in tbis epocb in East-CentraI Europe. In the
Ukraine, Tugan-Baranovsky was Minister o| Finance in tbe counter-revoIutionary
Hada yt 8wh|le in Ausma, 5chompeter held the same position |n t yt y
I
armies its reaIcreaon dates lm i Second Congress in uIy 1QzO.
ythenitastoo Iate tohaveanyimpacton thepivotaIbattIesolthe
post-ar conunctum. Jhe advance ol the Ked Ay nto PoIand,
hichbrieyseemed topromisehepossibiIity olamateriaI Iinki
the revo|uonary lorc |n CenI urope, as tron back |n
same month and ithin 8 l ks, he Jurinese occupations had
co||apsed, hi|e Len|n as appeaIing by teIegmph to the PS or
nationaIacon|ntaIy.Jhesedeleatserenot,ocourse,primariIydue
tosubecvemistakesorlaiIustheIattereasignoltheobjectiveIy
superiorstrengtolcapitaIismn Cen|and Westemurope,here
itshistoricaIascendancyovertheorking cIasshad suived thear.
tas not untiI alterthese battIes had been lought and Iost, that the
JhirdntemationaI becamesoIidIy|mpIanted in themajorcontinentaI
countries outside the USSK. nce the bIockade olthe Soiet State
as naIIy broken, ol course, the enormous const beeen the
debac|e olthe sociaIdemocraic apparatuses and deleat ol the spon
taneous risings in CentraIand Southem uope ontheone hand, and
thesuccessoltheoIshevi Party in Kussiaon theother,ensred the
reIativeIy rapid lormation oa centmIized revoIuonary ntematonaI
based on prncipIes dralted by Lenin and Jrotsk. n 1Q11 Lenin
composedhislundamentaItheoreticaImessage'tothenewCommunist
arties that had now been lounded virtuaII everwhere in the ad
vanced capita|istwor|d Ze]mioy Commcnism- Xo Iqmt:le Disordet.
n thshe synthesized the historicaI Iessons oloIshevi expeiencein
Kussaorsocia|istsabroad,andstarted toaddresshimseIllor the rst
time to the prob|ems olMarxist strategy in more advanced envion
ments than that ol the Jsarist mpie, in hich bourgeois pa|ia
mentariswaslarstrongerandorkingcIassreloismmuchdeeper
thanhehadrea|izedbelorethelirstWor|dWar. ystematictransIation
no, too lor the rst time reveaIed Lenin's ork as 8 organized
theoreucaI system to miIitants throughout urope, coming as a
sudden o|itica| iIumination to thousands olthem. Jheconditionslor
an internationaI diusion and lerti|izaon ol Maist theor, on a
wo ne sca|e nowseemed to be present and the Comintern the
guaaneolits mateiaIIinkagewith the dai|ystugg|es olthe masses.
n lact, this prospect as rapid|y annu||ed. Jhe savage bIos
inictedbyimpeia|ismon theKussianKevoIutioni tseIlhaddecimat
7ke 6!asi:o!T:ai::oa t
me Soviet orking cIass, even amidst its miIitary victo ovr the
te lorces in the CiviI War ter tg20 no immediate reIilcouId
be pted lrom the more deveIoped countries ol urope Jhe
USShas condemned toisoIauon, itsindustry mined,itsproIetariat
eened,itsagricuItureIdaste,itspeasanydisahected. CapitaIist
retabiIizauo had been accompIished in CentraI urope hiIe
revoIuuonahussiaascutohlrom it No soonerhadencircIement
bnbroken and conmctreestabIishedimtherestolthecontinent,
than me Soviet state ught in thevice olhussian backardness,
ithout poIiticaI aid lromabroad started to become endangered at
home.JhehardeningusurpauonolpoerbythePartyapparatus,the
ughtening subordinaon olthe orking cIass, the mounting tide ol
ociaIchauvinism,beIatedIybecameevidenttoLeninhimseIl,alrhe
had laIIen mormIIy iII i n tg22. His Iast rings - lrom his articIe on
Fmktm to his 7estaent - can beseen as a despemte theorecaI
attemp to hnd the lorms to permit a revivaI ola genuine poIiticaI
practice olthe masses, hich couId expIode the bureaucratism olthe
ne Soviet Smte, and restore the Iost unity and democracy ol
ctober
nearIy tg2q LenindiedWithinthreeyears,Sta|in'svictoinside
theCPSUseaIedthelateolsociaIism,andMarxism,ithineSS
lor decades to come StaIin's poIitiI appamtus active|y suppressed
voIutionary mass racuces i n hussia itseIl, and incasingIy dis
couragedorsabotagedthemoutsidetheSovietUnionTheconso|ida
tion ola bureaucraticaIIypriviIeged stratm above the orking cIass
assecured bya poIic regime oleverintensiyingerocit n the
condiuons, the revoIutionary unity ol theory and practice that had
made possibIe cIassicaI oIshevism as ineIuctabIy destroyed The
masses beIo ere interdicted, their autonom and spontaneity
etinguished by thebureaucrac caste that had conscated poer in
the country. Jhe partyabove as graduaIIy purged othe Iast com
panions olLenin. AII serious theoreucaI ork ceased in the Soviet
Union alter coIIecuvization. Jrotsky as driven ito exiIe in tg2g
and assassinated in tgq0 hyaznov as stripped ol his positions in
tgt anddiedinaIabourmpin tgg ukharinassiIenced in Ig2g
I
22
Qubshcd n rankrt n t zy undcr thc ]Ont ausQccs Ot thc tO
nsttutOns.
urng thc samc QcrOd thc nsttutc asO sQOnsOrcd thc maOr
sngc QrOduct OtMamst ccOnOmc thcOry n thc ntcr-ar ycars thc
Ork Ot Mcnryk LrOssmann - anOthcr cmgrant trOm thc Lastc
bOrdcrands Ot thc cOnnncnt. b n t 88t n LracO thc sOn Ot a
Lacan mnc-Oncr LrOssmann as thc samc agc as baucr and
scvcn yca Odcr than bukharn - n Othcr Ords Onc Ot thc Out
standng gcncrattOn that had rscn tO such hcghts bctOrc t t q.
LrOssmannhOvcrhaddcvcOQcdmOsOy:Orgnayastudcnt
ndcr bhm-bacrk n Ncnna hc had]Oncd thc Os
h LOmmunst
artyattcrthcrstOrarand OccuQcd aharOtOnOmcs at
arsaw Lnvcrst. n t z QOtcal rcQrsOn drOvc hm tr
Oand tO Lcrmany nd n t z6 hc dcvcrcd a sccs Otcctrcs at
thc mnkturt nstutc hch crc atcr cOcctcd tO tO a Ong
vOumccnttcd 7ke1aw]X::amaIat/nwd CIapse]tkeCap/taI/st
stem. ubshcd n thc vcry ycar Otthc Lrcat cQrcssOn Ott z,
LrOssmanns Ork summarzcd thc cass Qrc-ar dcbatcs On thc
a O OOn Ot tc caQitaistmOdc OtQrOductOn n thc tcntcth
ccntury and advanccd thc mOst ambtOus and systcmatc attcmQt sO
tartO dcduccts Ob]cctvccO aQsclrOmthcOgcOtMamsschcmasOt
rcQrOducnOn. ts ccntra thcscs hchaQQcarcd tObcsO nmcycrc
QrOmQtychacngcd by thc yOungcr ccOnOmst rtz otccrg a clt
sOca-dcmOcmt. otcbcrgs On wOrKJmperaI/sm z6),hch had
argcy bccn a rcstatcmcnt OlLuXcburgs QcrsQctvc cXtcndcd by a
nOvc anayss OlthctunctOns and uctuatOns Olthc rcscc army Ol
Our n caQtasm had carcr bccn attacKcd by LrOssmann. bOth
Qartcs crc n turn crttczcd by anOthcr MarXtst Ol Osh Orgn
atc MOszkOska n a sOrt bOOK On mOdc thcOrcs Ot crtss
r ttcnaltcrthcazsczurcOtQOwcr n Lcrmany. 'nthc lOOng
car aucr Qushcd hs ast thcOrctca OrK QrOQhctcay cnttcd
Beteeo 7a rI1 ars?, n c n LzcchOsOva. " n ths
I8
re kkumuorronz- und /uzommenbrum1ge1erj dez korrourr1men _1rem1,
Le|g r|ssued in lranlurt t }t .
" Zur 1rtrtk moderner 1r1emneorten Prague Mosowsa was born i
arsaw in 886 and em|grated to SwiterIand in t o8, whete she Iived in
ur|ch unt|I her death | n t 68
80
/wucen /we Hetkrregen: rat|sIava ty6
1hc Loaaco 1rodtt0n 2g
QOtca and ccOnOmc tcstamcnt thc mOst gttcd cXQOncnt Ot thc
ustrO-MarXst schOO Qcrtcctcd a tc-tmc Ot cXQcrmcntatOn th
Mas cQrOucOn schcmcs tO cOnstruct thc mOst sOQhstcatcd casc
tOr an undcrcOnsumQtOnst thcOry Ot caQtast crscs yct Qrcscntcd
and rccOrdcd hs na dsusOnmcnt th thc graduast rctOrmsm
hch hc had sO Ong Qractscd as a Qarty cadcr cang tOr a rc-
unhatOn Otthc sOca-dcmOcratc and cOmmunst mOvcmcnts nthc
struggc aganst tascsm.
n t 8, baucr dcd n ars shOrty attcr thc Munch Qact had
drvcn hm trOm bratsava. thn a tc mOnths thc occOnd Ord
ar had brOkcn Out and thc az cngutmcnt OtLurOQc cOscd an
cQOcOtMamsm n thc cOntncnt. n tq , MtcrdngQcrshcd atmc
ands Ot thc LcstaQO nars. t as nO Ony n thc ngs Othc
attc-cd that thc QOst-scrQts tO thc tradtOn thcy had ncaatcd
cOud bc rttcn. n t q n otzcrand MOszkOska Qubshcd hcr
ast and mOst radca Ork Oo thc Z_nomc 0_ 1otc Lotoam.
8J
Mcanhc n thc Lntcd otatcs thc yOung mcrcan ccOnOmst au
occzy rctraccd and summarzcd thc hOc hstOry Ot thc Mamst
dcbatcs On thc as tmOtOn OtcaQtasm trOmuan-baranOvsky
tO LrOssmann msctcndOrsng baucrs ast sOutOn Otthc QrObcm
Ot undcrcOnsumQtOn n a Or Ot mOdc carty 1hc 1hc0r_ 0_
Loroat Zcvcl0mcnt. MOcvcr occzys bOOk rttcn n thc
cnvrOnmcnt Ot thc cw 1ca mQcty rcnOunccd thc assumQtOn
that crscs Ot dQrOQOrtOnaty Or undcrcOnsumQtOn crc nsur
mOuntabc thn thc caQtast mOdc OtQrOductOn and acccQtcd hc
QOtcnta ccacy Ot cyncsan cOuntcr-cycca ntcrvcntOns by thc
otatc tO assurc thc ntcrna stabty Ot mQcrasm. hc utmatc
dsntcgratOn OtcaQtasm as tOr thc hrst tmccntrustcd tO a Qurcy
ctca dctcrnant - thc suQcrOr ccOnOmc QcrtOrmancc Ot thc
oOvct LnOn and thc cOuntrcs hch cOud bc cXQcctcd tO tO Ow ts
QathatthccndOtthcar hOsc`QcrsuasOn ccct Oudcvcnay
rcndcr QOssbc a Qcacctu transtOn tO sOcasm n thc Lntcd otatcs
tsc th ths cOnccQtOn 1hc 1hc0r_ 0_Lotout Zcvc0mcnt
markcd thc cnd Olan ntccctua agc.
I
/ur _nomk des ]tko]trotxmus urich Iyq].
tgt
-t g
t gt
aris
ucharest
iandreisAIgeria
home
JhesociaIorigins olthesethinerserenot dissimi|ar to thoseol
theirpredecesso. GeographicaIIy,hoever,thepattemolthisroup
maksaradicaIcontrastiththatoltheManistinteIIectuashocame
toprominencealterngeIs.Asehaveseen,virtuaIIyeveryimportant
theoristolthe to succeeding generations ter the lounders olhi
torica materiaIism theseIves, s lrom astem or astLenua
uropeevenithintheGermanicmpires,itasiennaand Prae
rather than erIin that provided the major Iuminaries olthe Second
ntemationaI. romtheendoltheirstWorId Wonards,onthe
other hand, the position as reversed. With the cenua eception ol
ukcs,andhispupiIGoIdmann,everysigihcanthgureinthetradition
indicated aove as lrom larther West. ukcs himseIlas IargeIy
lormed at HeideIberg, and aIays remained mom Gean than
HungarianincuIturehiIeGo|dmannIivdinmnceandSitzer|and
throughout his aduIt Iile. lthe to Germans ho ere born in
erIin, enjamin as notabIy and se|l-conscious|y GaIIic in cu| tura|
orientation hiIe Marcuse received his main tmining at reiburg in
Sabia TogenertionaIdivisionscanbemadeithinthistradition
" Lukcs wastheson olabanker8en|aminolanartdeaIerAdornoolawine
merchant Horkheimer ola textiIemanulacturer eIIa oIpe ola Iandowner
Sartreola navaI ocer Korsch and AIthusser olbank managers CoIIetti ola
bankcIerke|ebvreolabureaucrat GoIdmann ol a Iawyer Gramsci,uniqueIy,
was brought up in conditions olreaI poverty his grandlather had been a poIice
coIoneI, buthis latherscareeras a minor civiI servantwas uined when he was
jaiIed lor corruption, and the lamiIy suered greathardship therealter
" Southest Germany seems to have pIayed an important roIe as a distint
cuturaIoneinthistradition AdooandHorkheimerwerenativeo it,Luks
and Marcusewere trained in it HeideIberg and lreiburghad cIosephiIosophicaI
Iinks lromthetimeolthe SecondReichonwards lor en|amin's lrancophiIia,
see his remark as earIy as tQ2t n Germany, leeIquite isoIated in myeorts
and interets among tose olmy generation, whiIe in lrance there are certan
lorces @ @ @ inwhich see at workwhatoccupies me too' 1umnotons ondon
IgC p 22.
Hismainork inthenext
decadeasproduced outsideany organizationaI lrameork.
Jhus, lrom tgzqto tg6,Manismdidnot'stop',asSartreasIaterto
cIaim butitadvanced via8 unendingdetourlromanyrevoIutionary
poIiticaIpractice. Jhedivocebeteethe toas determined bythe
ho|e historicaI epoch. At its deepest IeveI, the late olManism in
uropeas rooted in the absence olanybig revoIutionary upsurge
alter t gz, except m th cuIturaI periphery ol Spain, ugosIavia and
Greecetsa|so,and inseparabIy,aresuItoltheStaIinizationolthe
CommunistParies,theloaIheirsolthe ctober KeoIution,hic
rendered impossibIe genuine theoretiI ork ithin poIitics even in
the absence ol any revo|utionary upheavaIs hich i tin tu con-
tributed to revent. Jhe hidden haImark ol Western Marxism as a
hoIe is thus that itisa productols[.JhelaiIureolthe sociaIist
revoIution to spread outside Kussia, cause and consequence ol its
corruption inside Kussia, is the common background to the entire
theoreticaI tradition ol ths period. ts major orks ere, ithout
excepion, produced in situations ol poIiticaI isoIation and despair
ukcss Histar wd Clas Camcaasoess t gz
) as ritten in exiIe
"" SeeFrancoCassano(ed,orumo 8 Jtloso_o mrolto ari t y}y,pp. },
qty, r 8ot. This voIume incIudes the tets ol the maor theoreticaI debates
within the PC in the les and sixties, incIudin the conoversy o t y6
relered tobeIow
lor this history, see now CoIIet's o account, in A PoIicaI and
PhiIosopicaI nterview', 1ew IIevw No 86,uIAugust y}, pp y
his remarkabe textis olgreatimportance lor a whoIerange oltheoreticaI and
poIiticaI probIems discussed in this essay. A number oli oncIusions, i lact,
aresimiIartocertainthesesadvancedhere aIthoughnaturaIIyinvestedwiththeir
on degreeolauthority Noothermaorthinkerwithin thetradition oleste
MarishasreveaIedsuch IucidityaboutitsnatueandIimitsas CoIIett. NeedIess
tosay,thereisnoreasontoassumethathewouIdassenttomyoltheparticuIa
argumentsor udements oU8 say.
7ke Xdveot o[ hestero xism
43
nVienna, hiIehite terror raged inHungaryalter the suppression
olthe Hungarian Commune. Gramsci's Notelooks erecomposed in
gaoI near ari, alter the denitie repression olthe taIian orking
cIassmovementbytriumphantlascism.Jhetomostimportantorks
olthe rankrt SchooI erepubIished at theorst nadir olpoIiticaI
reactionnWestGermanyandtheUnitedStatesalterthearAdorno's
mioima mormia tgt intheyearthatthelormaIprocess olbanning
the KPO started in West Germany, Marcuse's ros aod Ciwliatioo
tg during the hysteria olMcCarthyism in America. rance,
Sartre's Critiae o[Dimecticm Feasoo t g) as pubIished alter the
success olthe GauIIistcoup olt g , and atthe height oltheAIgerian
War,hen themass oltherench orking cIass - Ied by the PC
Iaynumbedand inert,hiIe terroristattacksby theAS struck atthe
le individuaIs ho activeIy resisted thear. t as in these years,
too, that AIthusser started to produce his rst and most originaI
studies Cootradictioo aod Over-Oetermioatioo t g6z,themostsigni
cant olthese, coincided ith the authoritarian instaIIation oldirect
presidentiaI ruIe and te II poIiticaI consoIidation ol the lilth
KepubIic.JhisunbrokenrecordolpoIiticaI deleat - lororkingcIass
stmggIe, lor sociaIism couId not but hae prolound ehects on the
nature oltheMarxism lormed in this era.
At the same time, the StaIiniation ol the parties created by the
Jhird nteationaI, lrom the Iate tenties onards bureaucratiaIIy
organized and ideoIogicaIIysubordinae to the poIicies olthe USS,
Ielt a rther, distinctie imprint on it. Jhe outcome olthe Secnd
WorId War,as has been seen, marked a ronounced silt in the e
graphicaI patte olMarxism as an active cuIturein urope, ith the
virtuaI disappearance ol Communism as a Iiving lorce among the
rkingcIassolWest Germany,and theemergenceand dominaneol
mass Communist arties in lrance and taIy. Jhese dieenta
situationsIedtoavarietyolresponsestotheprobIemolhotoreIate
Marxist theory to proIetarian poIitics, in the zones concerned, but no
soIution olit. lormaI incoporation in orkingcIass parties ukcs,
OeIIa VoIpe, AIthusser, exit lromthemelebvre, CoIIett, lraternaI
diaIogueiththemSartre,orexpIicitrenunciationolanyconnection
ith them doo, Marcuse ere aI I equaIIy incapabIe oluniting
ManisttheorydmasssuuggIe.oraIIthesetheorists,itmaybeaid
44
mat me ociaI Communistmovement represnted the centraI orsoIe
poIe ol reIationship to organied sociaIist poIitics, hether they
accepted or rejected it. Jo broad choices couId be adopted, ithin
thelrameork olthisreIationship. itherthetheoristcouIdenroIIn
a LommunistParyandaccepttherigourolitsdiscipIine.nthis_
he couId retain a certain nominaI IeveI olcontact ith the Iile olthe
nationaI orking cIass (to hich despite everying the party as
inevitabIy bound), and an at Ieast phiIoIogicaI continuity ith the
cIassicaI texts olManism and Leninism (hose studyasmandatory
ithintheparty).Jhepriceolthisproximity,hoeverreIative,tothe
reaIities ol daiIy orkingcIass stmggIe as siIence about its actuaI
conduct. NointeIIectuaI (ororker) ithin amass Communist Party
ol this period, not integmted into
SPOcentre
in ienna Jhe rst theorists ol Western Maism sti|| knew this
tmditiona| pattern Lukcs taught in the radica| Ga|i|eo Circ|e in
dapestduring the lirst Wor|dWar Korsh |ectred at he eeri
menta| Kar|Marx Schu|einer|in in theentiesJhecreation othe
nstitteolSocia| Kesearchin lrankrt anindependentintittin,
yeta|ated tothe|oca|Stat universiy marked atraniina|phae
in the Weimar Kepb|ic Alter theend olthe Second Wor|d War,
hoever, Marxist theory had mi
taskoltheoreticaI
` QarttCuar `tCuCrbaCh`s htosoQhCa mantCstoCs ` L t oung
marX` and `h I 8qq manusCrQts o arl marX` n or or London I QQ.
Farma|ks g
research ithinMarxismas to dingage e m|es olsoc|a| enquiry
discovered byMan, yet buried ithin thetopi|particu|arity olhis
ork, and ilnecessar to comp|ete them Jhe resu|t as that a re
markab|e amount olthe output olWestem Marxism became a pro
|ongedd inicate Oiscour on Method Jheprimacy accorded to
this endeavourasloreigntoM, in anyphase olhis deve|opment
e degree to hich epistemo|ogica| themes dominated this ho|e
aditionanbeseen inthe t|es0tscteriscorks Korsch's
sm PIasapk set out me basic mbric, at the very ouset
Jhe companion o|ume pub|ished by uk in the same year
opened ith an essay ent|ed at s Ora1a arsmr, hich
conc|uded condent|y that thete relerred exc|usive|y to metkad'.
Jhis preceptas therealter tond laithlu| reection in the obsess|ve
methodo|ogism oltheorksolthesubsequetanon books ent|t|ed
successive|y Reasan a1Reatan (Marcuse Oestract a]Peasa
(s Z a a Pastive 5ciee (Oea o|pe, 7e Prlem a]
etka1and Cuae a]Oalectica|Reaan (ae, Aegate tctc
Adomo, Rea1ngCapta(A|thusser.
Jhesecondordernatureolthediscoursedeve|opedbytheseorks
on Marxsm, ratherthan in Manism had arthercoro||ary. Jhe
anguage inhich theyererittencameto acquirean increasing|y
specia|iedandinaccessib|ecastJheorybecame,loraho|ehistorica|
period, an esoteric discip|ine hose high|y technica| id|om measu
its disnce lrom po|itics Mans on ork, ol course, had by no
means a|aysbeen conceptua||yeasy, lor readers olhiontie or
posterity utbothhisear|yphi|osophica| textsandhis|aeeconom|c
orks (the two most dicu|t parts olhis oeuvre oed their ini|a|
system ol terms to preexistent theoretica| ensemb|es essenia||y
Hege| and icardo hich they sought to criticize and surpass, by
the production olne concepts earerand c|oer tomateria| rea||ty
|ess hypostatized' in the vocabu|ary ol the oung a |ess
theo|ogica|' (in that ol the mature Marx. Moreover, hi|e never
concea|ing the ininsic dicu|ties lor a reader ol maseing any
scientic discip|ine, Man alter t 8q8 a|ays sought o pesent his
thought in as simpe and |ucid a ay as possib|e to maximize its
H:omd Lorr Lonrcourmrz Q. t
~ much the
bt oiuca| ana|ysis cf the subject.
8
course,asimported direct|ylrom reud. Jhese respectivecu|tura|
corre|ates goveming the topographica| position olthe thought ol
ukcs, Gramsci, Marcuse, Sartre and A|thusser are on|ythe most
mportant and prominent such sets ithin the tmdition olWestem
Marxism Para||e| re|ationsnbeloundin neary a|| olits representa
ves.Jhecentra|ro|ep|ayedinGodmannsorkbythepsycho|ogy
olPiagetithhomheorkedin Sier|and during thearis a
typica| instance ven outsie thelrameork othistradiuonproper,
the same m|e has tended to ho|d the re|ationship ol Seezy to
Schumpeterithin economic theory is acase n point. onverse|y,
theinuenceolasing|eidea|istthinkercou|dextendtosevera|diherent
Manist theorists. ache|ard, lorexamp|e, not on|yinspiredA|thusser
heasa|soadmiredbyLelebvre,SartreandMarse,hodrequite
other |essons lrom his ork. lreud, above a||, as acommon dis
covery, not on|y olAdomo and Marcuse, but a|so olA|thusser and
Sa a|thoughagain eachadapted orinterpreted his|egacyinvery
diverse direction. Jhis constant concorse ith contemporary
thoughtsystems outside historica| materia|ism, olten avoed|y
antagonistic to it, as somethng unknon to Marxist theory lore
the lirst Wor|d War. t a spehc and dehning nove|ty l
WestemMarxsmassuch.
" or AIthusser'sownstatements oIhis debtsto acheIard anguiIhem and
LacanseeForp. )andReangCapit p.t 6.acheIardwasAIthusser's
doctoraIsupervisor.
J
The maor exception is the DeIIa oIpean schooI in taIy. DeIIa oIpe
himseIIborroedextensiveIyIromeImsIev'sIinguisics Iorhisaesthetictheory
in Critica JelGutto but the schooI as a whoIe remained reIativIy Iree oInon
Marxist inuences compared withits homoIogues eIsewhere. This absencewas
probabIy connected to the Iack olma or hemac nnovaons which aIso dis
tinguished it aswiII beseenIater.
J
See 7e 7heorjo]CapitaltLevelopment p..
I?
SeeIa5ommeetRette pp. tqz-yBeinganJAotmgnettLondon y)
pp. yrotanJvilation Londont y6pp. t 66 andne-Limentiona
anpp.yo.TheseauthowereatctedessentiaIIybyacheIard'spoecs
ratherthan hisepistemoIogy.
J
" ompare Adoo 'SocioIogy and PsychoIogy' Aew Ie Revw Nos
q6 November t y6)-ebruary t y68 Marcuse rot anJ Civiliation passim
Ithusser'reudndacan'inIenanJFhitophjnJOthetajt London
NL t y)t Sarue Between tiam ondon N t yq
J
J~q1
IP
T impac olDarwinism thc8@c olmc ond ntcm8don8 QtoVdcs
10rme m_1
The pattemedserie olreIationships nningbetweenmjortheorists
olthis traditionand modern thinkers withinthearena olnnMat
cuIture, constituted so to speak the horizontaI s ol inteIIecaI
relerencelorWestem Manism.Atthesametime,however,itwasaIs
distinguishedbyaverticaIisolrelerence,olatypeIargeIloreignt
earIierManisttraditions too. ThiswasitsinvariabIeconstctinla
phiIosophicaI ancestry extending back bc_rc orx. AII the main
theoreticaI systems olWestern Masm reaI thesamespontaneous
mechanism in this respect. Without exception, they had recourse 0
preMarxist phiIosophies to Iegitimate, expIicate or suppIement the
phiIosophy olMan himseI This compuIsive rturn behind Man in
uestolapriorvantagepointlrom which tointerpret themeaningol
Marx's work itseIl, was once again a suggestive index olthe basic
historicaI situation ol Westem Manism. The new dominance ol
phiIosophers within the tradition as, as we have seen, one ol the
signs ol the generaI seachange that came over Marxist cuIre alter
t go.ThevrticaIIinesoldescenttowhichWesternMarxismnoIaid
cIaim,lorMarxand loritseI owed much tothisprolessionaI ascend
ancy ithin it. lor Man himseIl had Ielt no systematic work ol
phiIosophy, in the cIassicaI sense, behind him Abandoning his earIy
phiIosopicaI theses to unpubIished manuscripts, in his maturity he
neverentured onto pureIy phiIosophicaI terrainagain ven his most
important Iater statement olmethod, the t 8 ntroduction to the
rundrt11c remained a programmatic lragment, neer compIeted or
editedlorpub|ication The Iatent and partiaI nature olMarx's phiIo
sophicaI output had been compensated by ngeIs's Iater writings,
aboveaII theZntt-Zrtn_ lorhisimmeditesuccessors. uttheseleII
intogeneraI discreditalter t go, when the incompatibiIityolsomeol
perhapstenearestequ|aIentHowever,theauthor|ty oevout|on|smwas that
ol a naturaI sc|ence wh|ch d|d not |mp|nge d|rectIy on the soc|aI doa|n ol
h|stor|caI mater|aI|sm ItcouId therelore beapproved or adopted w|thout any
rea|ntrnamodcat|onolteatterEven|n the caseolautsy, pobabIythe
teor|st most suscept|bIe to the inuence olawnsm, drect importa|onsare
not character|st|c olh| ma|or prewar work A more exeme ep|sode olthis
|nwas,olcourse,theappeaIolMachorcertain oIshevikinteIectuaIs,above
a8ogdanov,wh|chprovoed Lenin to writemaerialmandmpiria-Criticm.
Here again, it was deveIopments in the phys|caI sc|ences which exerted
trans|ent - puIIonendswithinMarxism.Noma|orgureoltheth|rdgeneraon
ocIassicIMarism cvctM cctcd bmhoWcvct-
their centraI themes ith the probIems and hndings olthe naturaI
sciencesbecameincreasingIy obvious. Westem Manism, in lact, as
to sart ith a decisive doubIe rejection ol ngeIs's phiIosophicaI
heritage by Korsch and Lukcs in marmm ad Pkilosok and
Htog am Class Cooscioesoess respectiveIy. Jherealter, aversion to
the Iater texts olngeIs as to be common to virtuaIIy aII currents
ithin it, lrom Sartre to oIIetti, and AIthusser to Marcuse. n
ngeIs's conuibuuon as ruIed outolcourt, hoever, theIimitation
olMan'sonIegacyappearedmoreevidentthanbelore,andtheneed
to suppIement it more pressing. Jhe resort to earIier phiIosophiI
authorityithinuropeanthoughtlorthispurposecanbesn,inone
sense,asatheoreticaIregressionbeindMan.tisscarceIyanaccident
that the peremptory sentence ith hich Man himseIl cIosed his
accounts ith his inteIIectuaI lorebears PhiIosophers have onIy
interpreted the orId, in various ays the point is to change it'
shouId have echoed so IittIe ithin Westem Maism, hose phiIo
sophers ere statutoriIy debarred lromthe revoIutionary unity ol
theoryandpracticedemandedby theeIevenththesison l euerbach. n
theotherhand,asingIesentencecannotdisposeolcenturiesolthought.
Man's mere dictum couId never suce by itseIl to mish a ne
phiIosophylorhistoricaImateriaIism,or een to draup the baIance
sheet ol oIder phiIosophies belore it. Moreover, Man's o phiI
sophicaIcuItureasitseIlbyno meansanexhaustiveone. ssentiaII
steepedinHegeIand l euerbach, itasnot characterized byanyve
cIoseacquaintanceithKantorHume, OescartesorLeibniz, PIatoo
Aquinas, not to speakolotherIesserhures. Jhus inanothersense a
chronoIogicaI retum behind Manas not necessariIyaphiIosophiI
recidiism,preciseIybecauseManhimseIlhad neverdirectIy
or surpassed aII previous ethics, metaphysics, aesthetics, nor ev
touched numerous basicissuesolcIassicaI phiIosophy. Jhereb_
i n other ords, a certain Iegitimacy in the successive attempts mad
P
Thesingleexceptionto thisrule thetalianMarxistSebastianoTimpan
whohasdeIendedEngelssphilosophicallegacywithdignityandauthorityin
book5umatrialmo(Pisa I QyO pp It z}. ThecalibreoITimpanaroswo
morethan enteshim toconsiderationin any comprehensive surveyolest
Marism in this epoch However, ithas been soexpresslyaimedagainstallot
schools within thelatter, and represents aosition soaa that B impl
FarmaI Skgs t
ithinWestem Marxism to estabIsh an inteIIectuaIancestryreaching
backbehindMan.oraq creativedeveIopmentolMarxistphiIsophy
as such ouId inevitabIyhaehadtomovethrougha reconsideration
ol the compIex cognitive history hich Ma himseIl ignored or
bypassed. Jhe existing starting-points ithin the ork ol Ma
itseIleretooleand toonarrolorthis not to benecessary. tthe
same time the dangers invoIved in a proIonged recourse to pre-
ManistphiIosophiI traditionsneed no emphasis the oveheIming
eight ol ideaIist or reIigious motils ithin them is eII enough
non.
JherstmajorreinterpretationolManismtomakecentraIuseola
preMarxist system to construt its on theoreticaI discourse as
Lukcs's treatment olHegeI inHstar CIass Caosciaasmss. HegeI
had never been ideIy studied in the econd ntemationaI as a ruIe
its Ieading thiners had regarded him as a remote but no Ionger
reIevant recursor olMan Iess signicant than euerbach. Lukcs
dicaIIyovertumed thisestimateeIevatingHegeIlorthersttimeto
anabsoIuteIydominantpositioninthepre-history olMarx's thought.
JheinhuenceolthisreassessmentolHegeIastbedeepandIasting,
lor the hoIe subsequent tradition ol Western Marxism hether
Iater thikers assented or dissented lrom it. ut Lukcs's appeaI to
egeI ent much rther than this geneaIogicaI attribution or to
olthe most basic thereticaI theses olHistar adCIass Caoscaasmss
ere derived lrom HegeI, rather than lrom Marx the notion ol the
proIetariat as the 'identicaI subjectobject ol history', hose cIass
consciousnesstherebyovercame theprobIem olthesociaIreIativityol
noIedge and the tendency t oconceive 'aIienation' 8 an externaI
objectication olhuman objectivity, hose mappropriation ouId be
a retum to a pristine interior subjectivity permitting Lukcs to
dentily the attainment by the oring cIass ol true consciousness
inclusion oIit here mght see gratuitous. et even ths intransigently original
work has not escaped certain common determinations oIeste Marxism See
below, Ch. q note qC.
" SeeukcssowncommentsinHtorjanJClatt Contcioutnett,. Ihe
mao exception was Labriola, who had been a Hegelian philosopher hiselI
bIrehsencounterwitMarxism.encethesuddenreelationoIthediscoe
oIegeI byenin, ater the diredit oheSeondnteztionzI, in t
ol itseIl ith the accompIishment ol a sociaIist revoIution lorty
years Iater, Lukcs as to describe these distinctive theses ol
Histar aod CIas Caosciaasoess as an attempt to outHegeI HegeI'
himseIHowever,themvaIuationolHegeI'simporncelorManism
thatHistar aod CIass Caosciaasoess iniated lond mansuccessors.
Lukcs himseIl Iater sought to rediscover lundamentaI categoes of
Man's thought in that olHegeI, mther than to ntroduce HegeIian
categories into Marxism His study olTke Yamy HeyeI tg
8) as a
muchmoreschoIarIyendeavourtoestabIishadirectcontinuitybeeen
HegeI and Marx, based on Lukcs'reading olthe t 8qq Manuscripts
nMosco,andontheoIeoleconomicconceptssuchasIabourinthe
earIyritings olHegeI.
8
JhreeyearsIater,MarcusepubIishedPeasao wd PevaIaaao in N
ork, subtitIedHeyeI aod tke Pse a[Saim Tkear therstattempt
ata ManistanaIysisolthehoIedeveIopmentolHegeI'sthought, in
aII its phases, the preparation and precondition olMan's ork.
Marcuse's deIity to this concept olHege never avered Adomo,
much more criticaI than either Lukcs or Marcuse ol bjective
deaIsmasa phiIosophyolidentity', nevertheIessepIicitIybasedhis
majorworkonthproceduresolthePkeaameoaIag a[ miod: HegeI's
method',hedecIared schooIedthatolmioim maraha. ' n lrance,
on theotherhand,hiIeacceptingtheascriptionolcentraIimpornce
to HegeI in Marx'slormation, Srtrewas to reverse its evaIuationand
exaIt the antitheticaI contribution ol ierkegaard as a phiIosophicaI
correctivetoHegeIwithinManism WhiIe hoIdingthatMarxhimseIl
had superseded the antinomy ol ierkegaard and HegeI, he argued
thatMarxismin thetwentiethcenturyad tendedtobecomeapetried
neoHegeIianism, thereby revaIidating theprotest olexistentiaIism in
the name olindividaI experien against an aIIencompassing objec
tivist system, hich ierkegaard had rst ttered artre's own
reconstruction ol the historicaI process as such in the Critiqae o)
OiaIecticaI Peasao tookas its irreducibIestartingpoint the individI
conceivedinthissense, asthenaIterm olanysociaIcIassvenaler
HtorjandClatt Ctcioutnett, p. .
/
q
rm emeo odo ty, gg. tq
FarmalSk]s g
the Critiae, the onIy phiIosopher to hom he dedicated a speciaI
studyasKierkegaard.
n taIy, OeIIa VoIpe and his schooI ere resoIuteIy anti-HegeIian
lrom the outset both tmnchantIy negative in their appraisaI ol
HegeIs phiIosophy itseIl, and positive in their asseruon that Mans
thought represented a compIete break ith egeI. OeIIa oIpe him-
seIlconstruedManthroughadescentmnninglromAristotethrough
GaIiIeoto Hume aII olhom he cIaimedhadconducted critiquesol
hypostasesintheirtimesimiIartothataimedbyManategeI. tas
hispupiI CoIIetti, hoever,horotethemaorsystematicattack on
HegeIianism to be produced ithin Westem Manism Heyel and
%arsm. his ork as designed as a luII-scaIe demonstration that
HegeI as a Christian intuitive phiIosopher, hose basic theoreticaI
purposeas the annihiIation olobective reaIity and the depreciation
oltheinteIIect, in theseiceolreIigionandho thereloreasatthe
antipodes lrom Marx. y contrast, CoIIetti argued that the te
phiIosophicaIpredecessor olMarxas Kant,hoseinsistence on the
independent reaIity olthe obective orId beyond aII cognitie co
ceptsolit,preguredthemateriaIistthesisoltheirreducibiIityobeing
tothought.KantsepistemoIogythusanticipatedthatolMan,aIthough
the Iatteras never aare oltheextent olhis debt to it. SimiIarIy,
lorboth OeIIa VoIpe and CoIIett, MarxspoIiticaI theorpossese a
decisive antecedent ol hich he as unconscious the or ol
ousseau. KantsphiIosophicaI IimitshadIainin hisacceptanceothe
echange principIes olIiberaIcapi taIist society i tas preciseIy these
that Kousseau repudiated, in a radicaIIy democratic critique ol the
ourgeoisrepresentativeStatehichMarxas Iateri naII essetiaIs to
doIittIe more than repeat.
"
Compare or mar p ty, ReaJ Catal g. t d tca II,
Proposition .
FarmmSm]s
rigorous monism SimiIarIy, the centraI concept ol 'structuraI
causaIity' olamodeolproducuoninReagCapitalasasecuIarized
version olSpinoza'sconception olGod as acaaimmane.Above
aII,AIthusser'spassionateattackontheideoIogicaIiIIusionsolimmed-
iateexperienceasopposedtothescienticknoIedgepropertotheory
aIone, and on aII noons olmen or cIasses as conscious subjects ol
history, instead olas invoIuntary'supports'olsociaI mIauons,asan
exactmproductionolSpinoa'sdenunciationolerperimuaqaasthe
source olaII error, and his mmorseIess insistence that the rcheypa
deIusion was men's beIiel that they ere in any way lree in their
voIition, hen in lact they ee peanentIy ovemed by Ias ol
which they ere unconscious 'Jheir idea ollreedomi ssimpIy their
ignorance ol any use lor their actions. Spinoza's impIacabIe
deteinismendediththeconcIusionthatevenintheIeastoppressive
society, the say oliIIusion couId never be shaken oh 'Jhose ho
beIieve that a peopIe, or men divided over pubIic business, can be
inducedtoIivebyreasonaIone,aredreamingolthepoet'sgoIdenage
ora lairytaIe. ' AIthusserasto adaptthisnaItenettoo evenin a
communistsociety, men ouId stiII beimmemed in thephantasmsol
ideoIogy as the necessary medium ol their spontaneous experience.
AII human societies secreteideoIogyas the very eIement and atmos-
phere indispensabIe to their historicaI respimton and Iile.' Jhe
systematicinductionolSpinozaintohistoricaImateriaIismbythusser
and his pupiIs as inteIIectuaIIy the most ambitious atempt to con-
structapriorphiIosophicaIdescent lorManandtodeveIopabmptI y
netheoreticaIdirectionslorcontemporaryManismlromit onIy
Reading Capital, gg. g~. `tuth H thc crtcron both tscl aod ol
laschood`: thicaII, rog. LIII,bchoum.
Reg Capital, gg. I 8y_. Ieut ett omnium rerum cauta imma non
ero trae [`Lods thcmmaocot oot baoscotuscola thogs`): thica,I
rog. III
Jm go ett eorum liertat dea quodtuarum actionumnuam cognotcant
autam: sccthica,II rog. , bchoum. hc lourthgartolthcthicas
olcoursc cottcd Ietervitute humana,teude actum viut `Ln thc saVcr
ol mao or thc goWcr ol thc cmotoos` a ccoua thcmc throughout thusscr`s
Workooccthc baoscrgtoool`cmotoos`nto`dcoo8madc. bccororx
gg. z]zj ReaJing Capital, g. I 8O.
" bgooza 7ractatut 7heologcFiticut I, y.
ractice wrte
Adomo, andpracticeitseIlisannereucaconcept. e
dehant theoreucism ofthese pronouncemets ehectiveIy suppressing
the hoIe materiaI probIem ofthe unity oltheory and practice as a
dynamic bond beteen Marxism and mass revoIutionary stggIe, by
procIaiming their Iexica identity at the outset, C be taken as a
generaI motto olWestem Masm in the epoch alter the Second
WorIdWar TheyindicatetheunderIyinggroundshaedbythemost
isparate nteIIectuaI positionsithinit.
or olcourse, the theoreticaI systems olAIthusser and Adorno
ereotheisenotoriousIy dissimiIar in probIematicand orientation.
Jhecuriousintersection olcertainsignihcantthemesintheiroeuvresis
mereIyevidencethatavaguebinarycontrastbetweenHegeIianandanti
egeIian schooIsiswhoIIyinadeqatetodehne theexactIocations ol
the diherent schooIswithi Western Marxism, orthe interreIations
beteen them. Jhe very muItipIicity olthe phiIosophicaI hIiations
discussed above incIuding not onIy HegeI, but ant, ScheIIing,
Spinoa, ierkegaard, ascaI, SchiIIer, Kousseau, Montesquie and
others precIudes any such poIar aIignment. Jhe coIIateraI Iinks ol
each theorist with variantsectors olcontemporary bourgeois c|ture
lurther comp|icate the probIem ol the anities and antagosms
betweenthem.Theseintumereconditionandregateddvese
nationaIpoIiticaIsituations.notherords, it isperlectIyevident that
each individuaI system in this tradition has received the impress ol
a pIaraIig ol determinations deriving lrom diherent horions and
IeveIs olthe sociaI and ideoIogicaI structures olits own time and the
past,producingaideheterogeneityoltheories insidetheparameters
4
5ee Aegative Iiaectic, pp. t 8 q t 86o t y 6} 8y, t }}-8 It
shouIdbenoted thatdoo'sinsistenceontheprimacyoltheobect i sat Ieast
W strenuousas oIIet'srendering the Iatter's generic attacks on the rankurt
5chooI in this respect IargeIyoose.
4
o thc b88C h8totCl Con junCtutc dclmtn_ thc U8dton 88 8uCh.
hctc8 no 8g8Cchctc to mglotc thctc8l d8ttbuon otcl8on8hg8
Wthnth8 hcld n 8ll t8 ComglcXt. ot gtc8cnt gutgo8 t 8 motc
mgott8nt to Con8dct thc 88lcnt ot_n8lt oc8Cb 88tcm V8--V8
thc Cl888C8l lc_8C oh8totCl m8tc8l8m o thc gtcCcdn_ cgoCh.
tot n 8n b88nCc-8hcct o thc tcCotd o Nc8tcH m8tX8m thc
dcVclogmcnt o ncW ConCcgt8 ot cmct_cnCc o ncW thcmc8 gtoVdc8
thc mo8t CttC8l _8u_c oM n8tc 8nd goWct 88 8 udon.
+
bcmat O nnOVat Ons
omegeneraIlacetscanbediscemedatonce. Westemanism,ase
have seen, as progressiveIyinhibited lrom theoreticaI conlrontation
olmjor economic or poIiticaI probIems, lrom the tgz0 onards.
Gramsci as the It olits thinkers to broach centraI issues olcIass
stmggIe directIy in his ritings. He too, hoever, rote nothing
about the capitaIist economy itseIl, inthe cIassicaI sense olanaIysing
theIas olmotion olthemodeolproductionas such. Alter hi,an
equivaIent siIence typicaIIy shrouded thepoIiticaI order olbourgeois
ruIe, and the means oloverthroing it, as eII. Jhe resuItas that
WesternManismasahoIe,henitproceededbeyondquestions ol
method tomatters olsubstance,cameto concentrateoveheImingIy
on study ol 3U8f3lfUlUf83. Moreoer, the specic uperstructuraI
ordersithhichitsoethemostconstantand cIoseconcernere
thoseranking'highest' in the hierarchy oldistancelromthe economic
inlrastmcture, in ngeIs'sphrase.notherords, itas nottheState
" Gramsci's siIence on economic probIems was compIete. et, ironicIIy and
mysteriousIy,oneolhiscIosestandmostIileIonglriendswasPiero5raa - who
mediated his correspondencewiththe PIoutsideItaIyduringthe naIyearsol
his impriomen, andwas pobaIy he Iast man to taI over inteationaI
poIcs with Gramsci, a lew months belore his deathin ty]. Thereisa certain
symboIism in this strange reIationship between the greatest Marxist poIiticaI
inker in the West and the most originaI economic theorist olthe postwar
epoch,withitscombinationolpersonaIintimacyandinteIIecuaIseparation.here
appears to have been no remote connection between the universes l thir
respective works. 5raas eventuaI critique olneocIassicaIeconomicswas to be
moeigorousand damagingthananythingachieved withintheeIdolMarxism
itseIl. etthissignalachevementwas accompIished by a re, beyond Ma,
toRicardo, andthesystemwhchemeredlromit arIlessinleentl
elalein .
or a hich provided the typicaI objects ol i reeach t as
cuIture that heId the centraI locus olits attention.
AboveaII,ithinthereaImolcuItureitsel, itasZrtthatengaged
the major inteIIectuaI energies and gilts ol Western Manism. Jhe
patteminthisrespectisaestingukcsdevotedteIargestpartolhis
Iile toorkonIiterature,producingaserriedIeolcriticaIstudieson
the GermananduropeannoveI lromGoetheandcotttoMannand
oIzhenitsyn, cuIminatinginamassivegeneraIZrsthrtics ~ his Iongest
and most ambitious pubishedork. Adorno rote a dozen boos
onmusic,incIudingbothgIobaIanaIysesolthemusicaItransloations
olthe tentieth century and interpretations olindividuaI composers
suchasWagnerorMahIer,besidemvoIumesolessaysonI iterature
e too comIeted his oeuve wth an oemII Zrsrkruc 7kro_.
enjamin's most signicant theoretiIegacywithn Manismwas a
essay onZrt tkrZgr a]its mrckicalRrpradactian, and his major
crca achievement n the thirties was a study ol audeIare. s
accompanyingconcernastheorkolrect. GoIdmann'sprncipaI
work as an anaIysis olKacine and ansenism 7r Hiddrn Gad,
whichatthesametime set outageneraIcanonolIiteary criticism lor
" Zrti erIinNeuied t q6y. The most important wors ol Marxist
Iiterarciticism so l transIated into EngIish are 5tuJiet in uropean Reaum
(t qo) 7be Htoral Aovel (t q6z) 7be meaning o] Contemorarj Realitm
(t q6y)ttajt on 7bomat mann (t q6q) Goebe anJHuZe(t q6))5obenitjn
(t q)o) aII but the rst have been pubIshed by MerIin Press which has aIso
transIatedthe preMarxist 7beoro]tbeAvel(tq)t).
Zetrbetcbe 7beorie Franklurt tq)o. l the maor musicaI studes onIy
Fbotopb o] moe muti (ondon rq)y) has so lar been transIated into
EngIish The three voIumes olAoren uIierarurwerepubIished in Germany
(erIinandFrankrtam Main) t q 8~t .
" ee 1umatio pp it q- and Cbarlet BaJelaire: Z Ic Foet tbe
ra o]Higb Capitalm London NL t q)y
" enaminwasolcourseacIoseinterIocutorolrechtinexierecht'sown
aestheticthought whiIobviousIyolgreatinuinsicimportanceinthehistoryol
European Marxism in his timewasaIwayssubodinate tohis authoriaI pactice
as a dramatistand therelore laIIs somewhat outside thescope olthis essay or
rechtsduaIreIaonship to enaminandLukcsseenJerttanJingBrecbtpp.
t o~it andtheessaysansIat inAewIqRevwNo8{MarchApriI rq){
(Against Georg ukcs. Adoo'scricismsolenamin and recht lortheir
partmaybeloundinhetextstnsIatedinAewIqRevw No8t 5eptember
ctober t q)j (Lette to WaIter enjamin') and Aew Ie] Review No 8)j8
5eptember-December t q){ (omment')ThesecompIex exchangeslormone
olthemostcenaIdebates in hecuIdeeIomenolWtern Mxism
7kematic !oooratioos QQ
historicaI materiaIism hisothriingsexpIored the modern theatre
and noveI (MaImux). Lelebvre in turn rote a CaotriIetiao M
Xestketics. OeIIa oIpe lor his part produced another luII-scaIe
aeshetictheory Cntiee a]7aste, besidesessays onhImsand poetry.
Marcuserotenoseparateorkonanyspecicartistbutsystematic
aIIykeyedaestheticsasthecentraIcategoryolalree societyinhich
artasloolreaIityouIdhnaIIyshapetheobjectivecontoursolthe
sociaIorIdieIl- athemecommontobohras aod Ciwl:gatiao and
Xo ssa ao IiIeratiao. SartreshrstencounterithMarxismcoincided
m his pubIicaon ol hkat Iiteratere?, during the transition
toardshisoorkithinManisttheoryhismajoroutputas on
GenethiIeaIsoritingonMaIIaandJintoretto andhenhe
hadnaIIycompIetedhispassagetoManismhespentthenetdecade
on amonumentaIsdyollIaubert conceived onascaIeIargerthan
me sum olaII his eIier phiIosophiI orks combined. Gmms
mprents 8 usuaI areIated but distinct caseithin thisgaIIe. e
rote at considerabIe Iength on taIian Iiterature in the Prisao Nate-
baaks, but me primary object olhis theoreticaIenquiryas not the
reaIm olartbutthetotaIstructureandlunctionolcuIturelorsystems
olpoIitiIpoerinuropelrom theKenaissanceonards.Jhushis
most prolound and originaI investigationsere institutionaI anaIyses
l
J
|
rr
cLvugoton pp
t
4
t Q
4
~y zO8 t t .
rr
Ln#-m mno on
,
8,
t Q~
$ 7
-
ithinMarxism, evidentinMarcuse'sork,asparadoxicaIIyaIso to
characterie AIthusser's. The seIection ol concepts lrom psycho
anaIysis, and their translormation, ere hoever in this case very
derent. Where Marcuse adapted lreud's metapsychoIogy to lor
muIateane theory olinstincts,AIthussertookoverlreud'sconcept
olthe unconscious to constructane theory olideoag. AIthusser's
radicaI breakiththe traditionaI conceptions olhistoricaI materiaIism
IayinhisstarkcIaimthat'ideoIogyhasnohistory',becauseitis- Iike
the unconscious - immutabIe' in its suucture and operationithin
humansocieties. Theauthoritylorthisdictumas, byanaIogy, the
orkollreud, lorhom theunconsciousas'eternaI'.deoIogy, lor
AIthusser, as aset olmthiI or IIusory representations olreaIity,
expressingtheimaginaryreIationshipolmentotheirreaIconditionsol
exstence, and inherent in their immediate experience 8 such, it as
an unconscious system ol determinations, rather than a lorm ol
consciousnessasordinariIyconceived. Thepermanence olideoIogyas
a Iived medium oldeIusionas,intu, anecessaryconsequenceolits
sociaI lunction, hich as to lod men together into society, by
adapting them to the obective positions aIIocated them by the
dominnt mode olproduction. deoIogy as thus the indispensabIe
cement olsociaI cohesion, in every period olhistory. lorAIthusser,
the reason hyitas inescapabIe as an ensembIe ollaIsebeIiels and
representationsasthat aII sociaI strctureserebydehnitionopaque
to theindiiduaIs occupying posts ihin them. ndeed, the lormaI
structureoaIIideoIogyasaninvariantinversionolthisreaIreIation
ship beteen sociaI ormations and the individuaIs ithin them lor
Z4
1entn md hto1o]h_ pp t
|
I~2.
8
See |n part|cuIar, 'Thor|e, rat|que Thor|que et ormat|on Thor|que.
deoIog|eetuttedeoIog|que' atexth|therto pubI|shed |nbooklorm onIy |n
Span|sh transIat|on 1o uo1ojo como wrmo de o 1evouctn rdoba I 6b
pp. 2I -y]. ts theses are unequ|vocaI 'na soc|ety w|thout cIasses, just as | n a
cass soc|ety, |deoIogy hasthe luncuonolsecur|ngthe tond beween men in the
ensemb|e oe lorms ol the|re|stence, the reIauon ol|nd|v|duaIs to the|r tasks
xed bythe soc|aI structure & thedelormat|on olideoIogy |ssoc|aIIy necessary
asalunct|onotheverynatureolthesoc|aIwhoIemorespec|caIIy,asalunct|on
o|tsdterm|nt|onby| tsstructurewh|chrendersth|ssoc|aIwhoIeopaquetothe
ind|v|daIs ho occupy a pIace |n |t determ|ned by th|s structure. The repre
senta|on otheworId necessarytosoc|aIcohes|on|snecessar|Iymyth|caI,ow|ng
tothe opac|tyolhesoc|aI sucture. pp.
|
||
7kematic !ooovatioos 8
thekeymechanismolanyideoIogywasaIwaystoconstituteindividuaIs
imaginary'subjects' centres ollree initiative o[society, soasto
sure eir reaI subjection the sociaI order, as bIind supports or
victims olit. heIigion in generaI me 'binding' olman to God, and
LhristianityinparticuIar,providedinthisrp
ctthearchetypaImodeI
oltheeectsolaIIideoIogy toinstiImeiIIusionsolIibertythebetter
toensuretheworkings olnecessity. SpinozahadlumishedacompIete
accountolthischacteristicoperationolideoIogy,andpreciseIywith
respect to reIigion,earIierand more thoroughIy than Man. ut the
uconsciousnature olideoIogycouId todaybereIatedandarticuIated
toreud'sscientihcconceptolthepsychicunconscious,itIlinitiated'
by the loms ol ideoIogy pecuIiar to the lamiIy as an objective
structure. inaIIy, the transhistoriI statute ol ideoIogy as the
unconsciousmediumolIivedexperience, meantthatevenin aIassIess
society, its system olerrorsand deIusionswouId suive togivevitaI
cohesiontothesociaIstmctureolcommunismitseIl. orthisstructure,
too,IIbeunseenandimpermeabIetotheindividuaIswithinit.
Jhe
scienceolMarxismwiII nevercoincidewim theIived ideasandbeIiels
olthe massesundercommunism.
JheconcIusionsoltheworkolartrehavecertaincurioussimiIarities
ol undercurnt to those ol AIthusser. ut the dehning theme ol
Sartre's system, that distinguishes it lrom any other, is set by the
categoryolscarcig. JheteitseIlwascoinedbytheaIiankilosoke
GaIiani during the LnIighnment, who rst lormuIated aIue 8 a
ratio between utiIity and scarcity (rarit) in any ecnomic sstem
eando GaIiani Laa oneta MiIan ty6 edition aIue then | s B
rao and this is composed oltwo ratios epressed by the names ou|I|yand
scarcity'p. y). HisuseolthetermwassubsequentIyadoptedbyCondiIIac.or
Ricardo'sessingutiIitycommoditiesderivetheirechangeabIevaIuelromtw
sourcs lrom eirscarcity and lrom the uantty o Iabour requ|red to oba|
them'. 7eFrc.plet o]FoticalconomjanJ7aationLondon ty} ed|t|onp.
6 n practice howeer icardoIargeIyignored scarcityinhistheory olvaIue,
sinceeregardeditH pertinentonIytoveryrestrictedcategoriesolIuuygoods
ses nngs wines.
8
however, hadvirtuaIIy nothing in common with thatolGaIiani. or
the Iatter beIieved that theoriginaI condition olmankind was one ol
abundance: the most useluI objects were aIso the most pIentiluI in
nature.Manwas more ambiguos inhisaIIusions to theguestion.
ut whiIe occasionaIIy suggesting a primitive state olscarcity," he
more usuaIIy impIied an originaI prolusion ol nature reIative to the
paucity olhumanneedsbeloretheadvent olciviIization.Morver,
histheoryolvaIuecontained norelerencetoscarcitywhatever, unIike
even the nominaImention olit byhicardo. or Sartre, on the other
hand, srcity was the 'mndamentaI reIation' and 'condition ol
possibiIity' olhuman history, both the contingent starting-point and
the 'passive motor' ol aII historicaI deveIopment. No originaI unity
between manandnatureexisted: on thecontrary, theabsoIute lact ol
scarcitydetermined natureasthe'negationolman' lromthestart,and
history converseIy as an anti-nature. Jhe struggIe against scarcity
generated the division olIabourand so the stggIe between cIasses:
therewith man himseIl became the negatio ol man. YioIence, the
incessant oppression andexpIoitation olaII recorded societies, is thus
intemaIizm scarcity. Jheharsh dominion olthenaturaIworId oer
ithmarveIIousprovidencethisworIdis soconstitutedlorourgoodthat
utiIity generaIIyspeaking nevercoincides with scarcity. . . . Thethins needed
tosustainIileareso proluseIyspreadoverthewhoIeoltheearththattheyhave
no orreIativeIy IittIe aIue' Iaamoneta p. q.
dominantlo olsocia|
coeistence in eery mode olproduction to date. Their lormaI anti
thesisistheusedgroup',inwhichaIImenaremembersoloneanother,
uniteinalraterna|enterprisetoachieveacommongoaI,inandagainst
emiIieuolscarcity ThesupremeexaIeolalusedgroupisamass
movement at the apocaIptic moment ola success| revo|utionar
sing. ut to maintain itse|l in existence, pumuing 8 unequa|
ombat in a worId olvioIence and want, such a group must eno
itse| with organiationa inertia and lunction| speciaIizaon in it
tu, |osing its lternity and dynmism to become 8 institutiona
group. etrication and dispersion now await it me next step is to
transler the unity olthegroup upwards into a sovereign authorit
above it, to achieve a verticaI stabiIization. The State is the hnaI
embodiment olsuch a sovereignty, and its invaab|e ctes that
ol restrictd, auhotarian summit manipu|ating dispersed series
beneath it, though a breaucratic hierarchy and repressive terror
With its consoIidaion, the active group that oigina|Iy created it is
degraded once more to seiaIized passivity l groups and series
compose the lorma| e|ements ol any history' lor artre the rea|
history olsociaI c|asses charts the comp|e ombinaons or conver
sions ol these lorms into each oher |asses themseIve, however,
neverconstitute used groups as a whoIe theyare aIwas an unstabIe
compound olapparatuses, groupsandseries in whih the |atterwiI|
norma|Iy predominate. Thus the cIassica| aist notion ol the
dictatorship ol the proIetariat' was an impossib|e contradiction in
terms, a bastard compromise between ative sovereign and passive
seri|iy lor no c|ass as suh can coincide with a tate poIiticaI
powercannoteercisedbytheentireworingcIass,and theStateis
assured anorgnalp|entjtoan,whohad to do I|ttIeorethan receve it as the
s otheearh. See eiatan, ondon y8 ediion QQ. zyq-J.
I
resuIt lrom his struggIe lorhuman Iile or death. ome, the majority,
have emerged more or Iess unscathed - or at Ieast, give this out to be
the case manyolthese veeransbear themarksthroughouttheirIives
someiII dielromtheirhght, thoughatsomeremove, the oIdwounds
suddenIy opening again in psychotic epIosion, in madnes, the
uItmatecompuIsionola "negadve therapeuicreaction"others,more
numerous,as"noraIIyasyouIike,intheguiseolan"organic"decay.
Humanity onIy inribes its ocia deaths on its war memoriaIs
thosewhowereabetodieontime,i.e.Iate,asmen,inhumanwarsin
which onIykaaa woIves and gods tearandsacrihce one another.
Yetanothersavagemetaphorwas tobeusedbyStre, todescribeme
reIationsbeeenmeninauniverseolscarcity OurleIIowappears to
usasacounter-maninsolarashewhoisthesameappearsasradicaIIy
other - that is tosay,bearerolathreatoldeath tous. notherwords,
byandIargeweunderstandhisends(theyareourown),hismeans(we
share thesame), thediaIecticaIsctureolhisacts butweunderstand
themasiltheywerethetraitsoltker spenes, oudemoniacoubIe
Nobeing,inehect - neitherwiIdbeastsnormicrobes - issodeadIylor
man as an inteIIigent, camivorous crueI species capabIe ol nder-
standing and loiIing human inteIIigence, whose end is preciseIy the
destruction olman. Jhis species is, olcourse, our own 8 each man
apprehends it in every other in the miIieu olscarcity.' Passages Iike
hese beIong to a I
i
trature lndamenta loreign t te wrId ol
Man, LabrioI, or Lnin Jhey betray a subterraean pessmism,
beyond the decIared intentions ortheses oltheir " none ol
8
Ienn cFlotoj, pp. t 8 M
2
whomrenounced optimism olvoIition in the struggIeagainst scism
orcapitaIism. Marxismspoke thoughts onceunthinkabIelorsociaIism
throughthem.
JhecircIeoltraitsdehningWestemMarxismasadistincttraditioncan
now be summarized. orn lrom the laiIure olproIetarian revoIutions
in the advanced ones olLuropean pitaIism alter the First WorId
War,itdeveIoped withinan everincreasing scission bemeensociaIist
theoryandworking-cIasspmctice. Jhe guIlbetween themo, origin
aIIy opened up by the imperiaIist isoIation olthe Soviet State, wa
insdtutionaIIy widened and hxed by the bureaucratization ol the
SSK and olthe Lomintem under SaIin. Jo the exponents olthe
new Manism that emerged in the West, the omciaI Lommunist
movement presented the soIe reaI embodiment olthe intemationaI
workingcIasswith meaning lor them whethertheyjoined it, aIIied
with it or rejected it. Jhe stmctumI divorce oltheory and pracdce
inherent in the nature ol the Lommunist Pes ol this epoch pre
cIuded unitary poIitico-inteIIectuaI work ol the type that dehned
cIassicaIManism.JheresuItwasasecIusionoltheoristsinuniversiies,
evitabiIity olthe uItimate victo, not olman over history, but olnature over
man. It is thus more naIIy pessimistic, with a cIassicaI sadness, than that ol
perhaps anyothersociaIistthinker olthis century. In aII thesewys, Timpanaro
can be regarded as paradoxicaIIy yet unmistakabIy part ol the tradiuon ol
WesteMarxismthatheopposesItcouIdbearguedthatthenotabIeimportance
olancientphiIoIogy - adiscipIneentireIydominatedbynonMarxistschoIarship,
omWiIamoitto asuaIi ins ormationaIsocorresponds tothepatte
discernedinthisessay.This said, itmustimmedi ateIybe emphasiedthatinother
respects Timpanaros work presents a genuine and manilest contst wth the
normsolWesteMarxismhedierencesarethatTimpanaosphiIosophy has
never been primariIyreducedtoaconcewith epistemoIogy, buthas soughtto
deveIopasubsnuveoutIooontheworId, inacriticaI aIIegiancetotheheritage
olEngs thhisuseolLeopardi hasneverreIiedonacIaimthatMarxwasever
inuenced by or ew othe poet, orthatthe twosystemsothoughtareat
homogeneous Leopardi being presented as suppIying omething missing, not
something hidden, in Marx an thathispessimism is consiousIy decIared and
delended assuch, in a Iimpid prose LastIy, itmaybesaid thattheseuaits have
been accompanied by a degree ol lreedom lrom the eId ol lorce ol ociaI
CommunismgreaterthanthatolanyotherureolW esteMarxismTimpanaro
o in tz y, was uniqueIy neither a member olthe ommunis Party nor an
unattachednteIIetuaI,butaiIittinznoterworingcIsg tonthe
IeltotheP5IItaIian 5ociaIist Party andthenothe P5IP, intaIy.
TkemacJ mavaa _
arlromthe Iie ol the proIetariat in their own countries, and a con-
traction oltheory lromeconomicsand poIitics intophiIosophy. Jhis
speciaIizationwasaccompaniedbyanincasingdicuItyolIanguage,
whotechnicaIbarrierswerealunctionolitsdistancelromthemasses.
t was aIso conveeIyattended by a decreasing IeveI olinationaI
knowIedge or communiton between theorists themseIves lrom
dierentcounies.JheIossol anydynamiccontactwithworking-cIass
practice in turn dispIaced Mist theory towds contempo non-
Manist and ideaIist systems olthought, withwhich it no ypiIIy
deeIoped in cIose ilcondictory symbiosis. At the same time the
concentration oltheorists intoprolessionaIphiIosophy, togetherwith
the discovery olM's own earIy writings, Ied to a generaI retro-
specve arch lor inteIIectuaI ancestri to Manism in anterior
European phiIosophicaI thought, and a reinterpretation olhistoricaI
materiaIism itseIlin theIightolthem.JheresuIts oltis pattemwere
three-loId.lirstIy,therewasamarkedpredominanceolepistemoIogicaI
work,locusedessentiaIIyon probIems olmethod. SecondIy, themajor
substantive heId in which method was actuaII apIied became
aestheti or cuIturaI superstructues in a broadersense inaIIythe
main theoreticaI departures outside this eId, which deveIoped new
themes absent lrom cIassicaI Manism mostIy in a specuIative
manner reveaIedaconsistent pessimism. Methodsimpotence,at
cosoIaion, pessimsm as guiescence it is not dicuIt to rceve
eements olaII these in the compIeion olWeste Manism. or the
root deteinant ol this tradition was its lormation by deeat the
Iongdecadesolsetbackandstagnation,manyolthmtrribIeonesin
any historiI perspective, underone by the Weste working cIass
alter tzo
ut nor can the tradiuon as a whoIe be reduced to this. espite
everything, its maor thinkers remained immune to relormism. or
aII their distance lrom the masses, none capituIated to triumphant
pitaIism as econd ntemauonaI theorists Iike autsky, l cIoserto
cIass struggIe, had done belore them. Moover, the hisricaI e-
periencewhich theirwork articuIated, amidst is veryinhibitions and
aphasias, was aIso in certain crucaI respects the most avacedin the
4I
Horkhemersheonly exampleoIrenegacy but hcwasalwaysntcllcCtu8l
o secondaryt8nk as8thnkctWthn thc t8nkutt bchool.
4
worId encompassing thehighestlormsolthecapitaIisteconomy,the
oIdest industriaI proIetariats, and the Iongest inteIIectuaItraditions ol
sociaIism.SomethingoltheweaIthandcompIexityolthistotaIrecord,
as weII 3 its misery and laiIure, inevitabIy entered into the Maism
that it produced or pemitted ~ ilaIways in obIigue and incompIete
lorms nitsown chosen heIds, this Manismachievedasophistication
greater than that olany previous phase olhistorica materiaIism.
depth inthesewasboughtatthepriceolthewidtholitsange. util
therewasadrasticnarrowingollocus,therewasnocompIeteparaIysis
olenergy.Joday,theluIIeperienceolthepastltyyearsolimperiaI
ismremainsa centraI andunavoidabIe u stiII to be reckoned upby
theworkers movement. WesteMaismhasbeenanintegraIpartol
mat history, andno new generation orevoIuuona sociaIist in the
imperiaIistcountriescan simpIyignoreorbypassi t. JosettIeaccounts
with this tradition both Ieaming nd breaking lromit isthus one
olthepreconditions ola IocaI newaI olMarxisttheorytoday. Jhis
necessarydoubIe movement olreconnaissanceand pture isnot, ol
course, an excIusive task. Jhe natureolits obect precIudes this. lor
intheIastresort,theverytiesolthistraditiontoaparticuIargeograph
have aIso been its dependence and weakness. Marxism aspires i n
principIe to a mversaI science no more amenabIe to mereIy
nationaI or contnentaI ascriptions than any other objective cognition
ol reaIity. n this sense, the tem ' Westem inevitabIy impIies a
ttt judement. ack oluniersaIity is an inde oldehciency ol
truth. Western Maism was necessariIy Iess than Marxism to the
extent that it as Western. HistoricaI materiaIismcan exercise its luII
poersonIyhen itisllromparochaIsm, olanyknd.thasyet
to recoer the.
1
LOntrasts and LOnCusOns
Jheadventofanewperiodin theworkersmovementbringingtoan
end the Iong cIass pause that divided theoy from practice is ow
howeve isibIe. Jhe nch KevoIt of May I g marked in this
espectaprofoundhistoriI tuming-point. orthehrstdmeinnearIy
j0 years a massive revoIutionarypsurge occurred within advand
capitaIism~ intimeofpeaceunderconditionsofimperiaIistprosperity
and bourgeois democracy. Jhe onset ofthis expIosion ypassed the
renchLommunistParty. Withthi theocciaIconditionsofthe
historicnon-coincidenceoftheoryandpoIiticsinWestemLuropefor
thehrsttimestartedtofaII. Jhere-emergenceofrevoIutionarymasses
outside the controI of a bureauaed party rendered otenualj
conceivabIetheunicationofMarxisttheoryandworking-cIasspractice
onceagain. n theevent fcoursetheMayhevoItwas nota revoIu
tion and the main force ol the proIetariat in rance has neither
organiationaIIy nor ideoIogicaIy abandoned the P. Jhe d|sance
betweenrevoIutionarytheoryandmassstrugIewaslarlromaboIised
ovemightinParisduringMay-unetg68butitcIosedtoitsnarrowest
gap i n Lurop since the generaI skewas defeated in Jurin during
thetuoiI olt gzo.JherevoItin rancemoreverwasnottoremain
an isoIated experience. Jhe subsequent years have seen a widening
intemationaI wave of working-cIass insurgency in the imperiaIist
worId unIike anything since the earIy twenties. n t g6g the taIian
proIetariatunIeashed thegreatestwave olsuikes everrecorded inte
countryint gztheritishwrkingcIassIaunedthemostsuccessluI
ndustriaI ohensiveinitshistory, paraIysng thenationaI economy in
I g]] apanese Iabour mounted its Iargest assauIt against capitaI to
date n I g]q the worId capitaIist economy entered its hrst major
synchronied ressionsince the. hechance ofa revoIuuona
circuit rpening betn Manist teory and mass pracuce Iooped
trough reaI sggIes of the industriaI orking cIass has become
steadiIy greater. Jhe consequences ofsuch a reunication oftheory
and practice ouId be to ansfo Masm itseIf recreating con
ditions hich i n their ume produced the foders of historicaI
materiaIism.
eanhiIetheseriesofpheavaIsinauratedytheMayhevoIthas
hadanothercritiIimpactonthecontempoprospectsofhistoricaI
materiaIism in the advanced pimIist one. est arism from
ukandKorschtoGramsorthusrocpiedinmanyrpec
thefrontofthestagein thehoIeinteIItuaIhistoryoftheLuropea
eft after the victory of mIin m the h. ut throuhout this
periodanothertraditionofanenureIydierentcamctersubsistedand
deveIopedo-smge' fortherstumetoainiderpoIiuIattention
duringandaftertherenchepIosion.hisg ofcoumethetheory
andIegacyofJrotsky.WestemMasmasehaveseenasaIays
magneucaIIy poIaried toards ociaI ommunism as the onIy
historiIincamauonoftheintemaionaIproIetaratasarevoIuuon
cIass. t never compIeteIy accepted taIinism yet it never activeIy
combatediteither. uthatevernuanceofatutudesuccessivethinkem
adopted toardsit foraII ofthemthere nootherehtivereaIity
or miIieu ofsociaIist actionoutsidet. tasthisthatdivideditfrom
Jrotskys ork by a poIiticaI univeme. orJrotsky's Iife from the
death of Lenin onards as devoted to a pmctiI and theoreticaI
sggIetofreetheintemationaIorkers'movementfrombureaucratic
dominationsothatitcouIdrsumeasuccessIoverthroofcapitaIism
onaorIdscaIe.OefeatedintheinnerpartyconictithintheLP
nthetentiesand eiIedfromtheSSKasastandingdangertothe
regimesymboIiedbyStaIinJrotsky'smostenduringdeveIopmentof
Manist theory began i n exiIe. His ne ork as bom from the
matrixofatrendousmassupheavaI thectoberhevoIuuon. ut
Jrotskyismasa system asa deIayedbirth itIargeIypost-dated the
KevoItion hen the experience that made it possibIe had aIready
" A|though, of course, it had its propheuc origins in his pre-revoIuuony work
Retul Frotpec.
CantrastsCamImam
d8aggcarcd. rot8k8 hr8t ma[or groducton m cXlc W -
ungucl or a Mam8t thcoH8t o h8 8taturc - a Work o concmtc
Hta_. M8 Histaga]tkeRssiaReaIatiaa (l gO] rcman8 n mM
Wa8 thc mo8t cOmmandn_ cXamglc o marX8t h8tOrcal ltcraturc to
th8 da] Md thc onl onc Whcrc thc 8kll d ga88on o a h8toHM
Wcrc joncd to thc acuVt and mcmor o a golb ldcr d
or_anzcr n a major rccon8tructon o mc ga8t.
rot8k8 ncXt achcVcmcnt Wa8 n 8omc Wa8 cVcn mom 8@t.
8olatcd on a urk8h 8land hc Wrotc rom a d8Mncc a gcnO o
tmM on thc r o W8m n cUnan Who8c gualt concrctc
8tudc8 o a pkucmcaqmtme8 unmatchcd n mc mcord8 o h8toHca
mMral8m. n th8 hcld cnn hm8cl ncVcr groduccd M WorK o
comgablc dcgth and comglcXt. rot8k8 Wrbn_8 on crman
a8c8m con8ttutc n act mc hMt rcal MarX8t anal88 o a tWcntcU
ccnmr cqitahstState ~ thc makn_ o thc Waz dcMtoMhg. hc
ntcUatonal8t naturc o h8 ntctcnton dc8_ncd to mc cUnan
Workn_ cla88 a_an8t thc mOrtal dan_cr thrcatcnn_ t Wa8 mantancd
mrou_hout thc rc8t o h8 lc. Xlcd and huntcd rom coun to
con WthOut ghy8cal cOntact Wth thc grOlctarat o an naton hc
cOntnucd to groducc gOltcal anay8c8 o thc h_hc8t ordcr o thc
c8t urogcan 8ccnc. ranCc n_and and bgan Wcrc all cXmncd
b hm Wth a ma8tcr O thc natonal 8gcchct o thcr 8ocal orma-
ton8 that cnn ~ ovcrWhclmn_ly cOnccntratcd On u88a ~ had ncVcr
attancd. nall hc ntatcd a r_Orou8 and cOmgrchcn8Vc thcOr o
Uc naturc o thc bOvct btatc and thc latc O thc Lbb undcr btaln
documcntcd d dcvclOgcd Wth a ca88cal cOntrOl Ot cvdcncc. hc
h8torcal 8calc o rot8k8 accomgl8hmcnt 8 8bll dmcult to rcalzc
toda.
t, g.
^J
" 7he Frophet ZrmeJ (tyq) 7 Frophe narmeJ tyy 7he Frophet
Outcatt( y6y
Contrasts ad Caoclasiam
studyolthehistoryolserldomintheregion. apturedby theGerman
rmy during the Second WorId War, he was imprisoned in Nazi
concentration camps. On his reIease in t p he emigrated to the
nited States,whereheworkedasan isoIated researcherinNewYork
and etroit, abandoningdirectpoIiticaI activity. Jherehewrote one
olthe lewsignicantManisttextson thenationaIprobIem inEurope
to appearsince the time olenin.His mayam oas, however, wasa
Iong,o-voIumeexamination olMan'sGrandrisse anditsreIationto
Caita| ~ pubIished posthumousIy in West Germany in t p6. Jhe
aim olthis maj orreconstctionolthe architecture olMan's mature
economic thoughtwas tomakeitpossibIelor contemporaryManism
to rejoin the centraI tradition ol economic theory within historicaI
materiaIism, broken o with the expiry ol Austro-Manism in the
interwar period. Jrotsky himseIl had written no major economic
work, unIikemosttheorists olhisgenemtion hosdoIsky himseI not
aneconomistbytmining,undertookhisworkoutolasenseoldutyto
succeedinggenerations,asaIonesuivoroltheLastLuropeancuIture
that had once produced oIshevism and Austro-Marism. H|s hope
wasnotinvain.ouryearsIater,EmestMandeI aeIianJrotsyist,
who had been active in the hesistance and imprisoned by the Nazis,
belorebecomingprominent|ntheourthnternationaIatertheWar
pubIished in eany a luII-scaIe study olJate Caitalism, directIy
indebted to hosdoIsky the hrst theoret|caI anaIys|s olthe gIobaI
deveIopment olthe captaIist mode ol product|on s|nce the Second
Word War, conceived within the lramewor o cIasiaI Mar|st
categories.
` nedrc Ingdr und dor 1roNem der ` erccrroren oker` anover t y6q.
lor RosdoIskys biograph, see the nocein @uorrmc nrcrnoronoe No. ]],
ApriI t y8.
j
hc arc and nucnCc ol mao la otsdc hc sCoc ol ts cssa:
08so ot 8t cn@th W ncCc cscWhcc.
Lomt mLo I
Marxsm w nOt havc mcasurcd tsclaganst mc m rcad Olmc
grObcms wth whch thc cvatOn O cagta cOnlrOnts t, n thc
sccOnd ha O thc cntcth ccntury. hc lau Olmc hrd ntcr
natOna, cvcnnthchcydayOlLcnn, tOmakcanyscrOushadwayn
thc AngO-bOn gOwc, whcn thc LbA and brmn wcrc mc mO
grcatcstccntrcsOlwOrdcagtasm,ndtcsthcdcgrOlimomlsam
Ol hstOrca matcrasm thc vcry hcght Ol ts accOmgshmct
a vng vOutOnary thcOry. Oday, thc lOmdabc socndhc
grObcms gOscd tO thc sOcast mOvcmcnt by thc gtast mOdc Ol
grOductOn at ts ttroet, thcr man at ts wcakcst, st argcy
rcman tObsOvcd.Mamsm nthsscnhasycttO acut tlOlts
mOst dct tasks. t s unkcy tO suarc ug tO mcsc und t s
hnayt hc mc mgcra btOns lmc AngO-bOn
wOrd
Or altcr thcrOOngcd, wndng dctOur Olcstc Masm mc
cstOnscltunanswcd byLcnnsgcncratOn, andmadcmgOssbc
tO answcr by thc mgturc Ol mcOry and gctcc n btan`s cgOch,
cOntnuc tO awat rcgcs. hcy dO nOt c wthn thcursdctOn Ol
ghOsOghy. hcy cOnccrn thc ccntra ccOnOmc and gOtca rcadcs
that havc dOmnatcd wOrd hstOry n thc asthlty ycan. hcrc s nO
sgacchcrc tO dO mOrc than grOvdc thcbrclcststOlthcm. rstand
lOrcmOst, what s thc rca naturc and stcturc Olarge demacracj
asatygcOlbtatcsystcm,thathasbccOmcthcnOrmamOdcOlcagtast
gOwcr n thcadvanccd cOuntrcsr hattgc OlraIanarjsra
gabc Ol OvcrthrOwng ths hstOrca lOrm Ol btatc sO dsdnct
lrOmthatOlsarst HussarhatwOud bcthcnsdtudOnal lOms Ol
saciaIistdemacrag n thccst,bcOnd t MamstthcOryhasscarccy
tOuchcd thc thrcc subccts, n thcr ntcrOnncctOn. hat s mc
mcanng and gOstOn Olthc tianas a sOca unt, n a wOrd dvdcd
bycasscsrAbOvca, whatarcthccOmgcxmcchansmsOlnationas,
a mass ghcnOmcnOn Ol cmcnta lOrcc n thc ast mO ccnturcs
Ncthcr Ol thcsc grObcms has cvcr rcccvcd an adcguatc rgOnsc,
lrOmthctmc OlMaandngcsOnwards.hatarcthccantempararj
Iasa]maa[capitaIismasamOdcOlgrOductOnandarcthcrcncw
lOrms Ol criss sgccc tO thcmr hat s thc tc cOnhgratOn Ol
imperiasm as an crnaOna sstcm Ol ccOnOmc and gOtca
dOmnatOn Ork has Ony ust cgun agan On thcsc ssucs, n a
adg obg chabgcd 8bcc bb or aucr. tba What thc
m chctcr8o 8bd dbam othc bareaacrat 5tatet that haVc
cmc@cd lrom thc 8oca8t mVouoob8 b thc backWard coubuc8 b
bth thcb abd dtmcuaa lmm cach othcrf MoW tgo88bc
ot d &ttracaaa o] praIetama &mrq altcr thc mVouoob b
ua toblooWcdbthcmbgolVouoob8 witkaat praletana
&rg ]mm tm oauet b Lhba abd chcrc: abd What arc thc
dOtc bmt8 to 8uch a gro roUk baugumtcd 8ba88 o
thc0mmhcddbotkvctothcattcr. t 8thw cd gc8dob8
mt Umdmtc mc mOamgctoh8tor matcra8m toda.
1gmd00 mcr Wuon m g m 0B
ooo0@M0om0080btln thc
b0mc8bd8 ol bdu8da g8m. Lb thm W B bcW mt ol
8oa8t thcor 8bd Workbg<a88 gmcb b go88bc gabc ol
mdoWbgMam8mWth thc goWm bo to groducc thc kboW-
gct aOtoda. c lom8 bWmO th8 thcor olthc mmrc W
Mc@c bot b lo b bor N . t Woud b B m8takc to
cthatthcWbo mgtthcc8modc8olthcga8t.
YHa a thcmajorthor8Oolh8tor matcra8m to datc lrom
MM or Lr._cs thcmVto o8hcVk8 lromthc cadbghgurc8
olu8uo-MarX8m to tho oltmMaO8m haVcbccb btccct-
ua8dmWblrom thc go888bgc 8! morc oltcb thab bot olhghcr
mthcr thab oWcr bourgco8 orgb. mm8c 8 thc 8oc cXamgc to
haVccomclromabackgroubdolactuagoVcrtbutcVcbhcWa8bom
l lrom thc grocmat. t 8 mgo88bc bot to b th8 gattcm a
gnV8obammaturt olthc btcmaooba Workbgca88 a8 a Whoc
b a Word-h8tor gcngccoVc. t 8 cbough to thbk ol thc cob-
gucblorthc Lctomr cVoutobolthc lmgtolthc o8hcVk
Ld ud a goo cadcr8hg rotcd oVcrhcmbg lrom thc
u88ab btcgcbt8a 8ugcrmgod ob a 8o argc ubcdutcd
Workbg ca88: thc Wth Whch both Ld uard abd groctan
WguardWHccmbatcdbbmbbthcwcboc8botubcobbcctcd
" Jhc conVcntonal aggcllaton gct-bourgcos ntcllcctua s not aggro
gratc lo most olthchgurcs dscusscd abovc. Man olthcm cac lomlc8
olWcalth manulacturcm mcrcan and bankcm [ngcls LuXcmburg aucr
Lto8smann domo cnamn M bWccz] atgc landoWncm
[oV_ mcngbroa]] or laWs or bcau [M_ Ln].
LommLo t
wththcsOcagagbcmn thcm.wOrng-cassmOvcmcntgabc
l achcvng a dubc sclmancgabOn w nOt grOdu ths
duasm. hc 'Organc tccctuas' cnvsagcd by sc gcnctcd
wthn thc ks Ol thc grOctarat t havc nOt yct Occgcd thc
stmctu rOc n rcvOubOnary sOcasm that hc bcvcd wOud b
thcn. hc cxncmc lOms Ol Otcrcsm that havc chctcrcd
cstcm Mamsm wc symgtOmabc Ol 'dbOnN tcas' n
msc'snscnagcrOdwhcnthc ttcOrnOcOntactbmn
sOcastthcOryand grOctaran gcb. but n thcOngmnthcmturc
OlMarst thcOrywc wth ntcccmasOrgygrOdubythc
IsHW Iass Om mgst wOr mI thcy
stcadygan n cutura sk and l-cOnhdcn.
hchnawOrd CrcstwthLcnn.HslamOusdctumthat'wthOut
rcvOutOnary thcOry thcrc n b nO OubOnay mOvcmcnt' s
Oltcn and rghty guOtcd. but hc asO wrOtc wth ua wght:
'LOct vOubOnary thcOry 0 0 0 assum hna shagc Ony n cOsc
cOnnbOn wth thc gctca actty Ol a y mass and y
rOubOnary mOvcmcnt.' Lvcry cau hcrc cOunts. HcvOutOnary
thcOry C b undcrtakcn n rcabvc sOabOn Mam n thc brbsh
Muum Lcnn nwar-bOund urch:but tcan Onyacguacarrect
and lOmwhcn bOund tO thc cOccbvc sgg Olthc wOrkng
cass tscl. Mcrc lOma mcmbcnhg Ol a garty OrganatOn Olthc
tygcmarn rcnthstOry dOcsnOtsumcctO grOvdcsuchabOnd:
aclate connectian wththcpratical activig OlthcgrOctaratsncccssa.
NOrsmtancy n a sma rcvOutOnarygrOug cnOgh: thcrcmustb
a nkagc wth amal matt. LOnvcrscy nkagc wth a mOvc
mcnt s Ot cnOugh cthcr lOr thc attcr may bc lOmst: t s Ony
whcnthc masscsarctkemelvet rmalmiam, thatthryC cOmctc
r e6
cmncnt vouon. h hvc conddons lor thc succcssml gursut
MarXsm havc not bcn asmblcd anWhcrc n thc advanccd
gNlst World sncc thc bccond orld ar. hc grosQccts lor thcr
maggcc arc noW hoWcvcr at last nCcastng. cn a tml
rcvolutonaQ movcmcnt s bom n a maturc Worktng class thc `hnal
8hagc` ol thcor Wtll havc no cxct grcccdcnt. ll thal can bc sad s
that Whcn thc mass thcmsclvcs sgcak thcorcuc8ns ~ ol thc sort thc
t groduccd lor hlg cM ~ Wll ncccss8rl slcnt.
tcrWOrd
hc camswthwhch thcsayabOvc cOncudcsmustnsgrc ccrtan
scatOns tOday. Or thc ack sOmc ndsgcnsabc guahtOns
and dsbncbOns wthOtWhchthcr Ogcsutmatcya rcducbOnst
Onc agOcaygtc tOnc s la sugt sgn Ol dmcubcs
mgtOry cvadcd Or gnOd. O gO th dmcbcs adc-
guatcy nOt tO sgcak Ol sOvng th wOd nccdanOthcr cssay.
hc mOst that C bc dOnc hc s mcrcy tO ndtc thc nna
wcakncss nthc cOnsnucbOn Olthc grcccdng tcxt. hsC bc statcd
succncty. Mamst thcOry t s argucd thrOughOutn acccntuatcd
tcms tOwards thc cnd acgurcs ts grOgcr cOntOurs Ony n drcct
abOn tO a mass rcvOubOnary mOvcmcnt. hcn thc attcr s
chbcy abscnt Or dclcatcd thc lOmcr s ncvtaby dclOrmcd Or
ccgd.hcgrcmscOlthsgcasvcthcmcsOlcOurscthctcnctOl
thc 'unty Ol thcOry and gcbcc` nadtOnay dccmcd tO dchnc
MamstcstcmOOgyassuch.hcrc arcccrtanhtsnthccssaythat
thcrcatnbctccnthctwOsmOrccOmgcxthanhascustOmarybccn
cOnccdcd but as a whOc thc tcxt s a sustancd ammatOn Ol thc
lundamcnta bOndbctwccnscnccandcasshstOr matcrasmand
grOcmran nsurgcncy n ths ccntury. hc actua cOndtOns Or
grcc hOrOns Olthc unty Ol thcOry and gractcc gOstuatcd arc
nOwhcrc cxamncd. hc rcsut s that thc cOncusOns Ol thc cssay
nvtc an 'actvst` rcadng Ol ts thcscs that cOud bc sccnbhy
untcnabcand gOtcay rrcsgOnsbc.
Or thcrc s an nsugcrabc ObcctOn tO any accOunt Ol Marxsm
suchasthatsuggcstcd n thcastgagcsOlthscssay. tsstrangcthatt
has nOt bccn madc mOrc lgucnty bclOrc. lthc grOgcr dcsgnatOn
lOrMarxsmshstOrmatcrasm tmustb abOvca athcOry
I I0
0m8to@. 3cth8tO@ 8- gm-cmncntl - thc. hcgrcscntand
mc Mc 8l8o o COursc hstOrl and t 8 tO thcsc that thc
bdbOnalgrcCcgtsOndcrOlcOgtaCtCcWthnMarXsmnvOluntarl
rOcr. butthcgastCannOtb altcrcd b an gmCtCc Othcgtcscnt. ts
mO Wll alW88 bc rcntcrgrctcd ts cgOCh8 rcdsCOvcrcd b latcr
gmmbOnst thc nnOt n an sObcr matcralst nsc bc Changcd.
olbllthcakOlvngmcnandWOmcn -nthcaCmalgrcscntand
mcOm lcmturc 8mmcasurablmOrcmgOHntOra8OCalst
m m othO COnsdcmbOn. bCcnmll hoWcvcr thc Ovcr-
WhOngl grcgOndcmt dOman o rMnablc knOWlcdgc s thc
omcdWd.Jhcga8tWhCh nnotb amcndcd oruodOnc n
b WmgmatcrrMnt mthcgrmntWho8caCton8 h8vc
t0 b donQ 8nd thcm8 mOm ot. hcrcWll thu8alWa8rcman
mcNt gart btWn knOWlcdgc 8nd 8CbOn thcOr md
g, or m go88dlc 8Ccn Oh8to@. o msgOnsblc Mam8m
MmO Ndtc rom thc k o Comgrchcndng thc mmcn
othcga8t Or Clam tOcXcrCsc thc jursdCbOn Oa matcral
omabOn ot. Mam8tthcOrs thu8 nOt dcsgtccvcrlaudablc
tcmgtauOn tO bccguatcd Wm arcvOludOnar sOOOlOg. 1tC ncvct
b t6uCcd tO thc `analss O thc Cuncnt COn[unCturc` n a nOW
onablc tcmnOlOg. Or b dchntOn What s Curtcnt sOOn
gas. OCOnhnc MatXsm tO mc COntcmgO s tO COndcmn t tO
8gcrgctual OblvOn nWhCh thc grcscntCcascs tO bcKnOWablc OnCc
td ntO thcgt. cWsOCtaltsts WOuddsntrOm ths.3ctthc
".s is not an imaginy docine A recent wor decIes Marxism, as a
eoreticaIandpoIicaI practice,gainsnothinglromitsassociationwithhistoricaI
ngandstoricaIrearch.hesdyolhistoisnotonIyscientcaIIybut
olitiy vaIueIess. he obect olstory, the past, no matter how it is
conceivd, cannot ect presnt condions. HistoricaI eves do not esad
C ave no materiaI eectivity in the present. he condions olexistence ol
rnt sociaI reIaons necessariIyexistinandareconstantIy reproduced in the
tisnotthe present, whatthepasthasvouchsaledtoaIowus, butthe
cent siation which it is the obect olMarxist theory to eIucidate and ol
MarxistpoIiticaI practicetoactupon.AIIMarxisttheory,howeverabstractitmay
e,owevergeneraIitseId olappIication,existstomakepossibIetheanaIysisol
ecurrentsituaon A historicaIanaIysisolthecurent siationisimpos
iIe.. Hindness adP.Hit,Fre-CapitaltoeojFroJutn,Londoni yyy
. _ I 2.heauthorsolthispronouncement,remotedescendantsolAIthusser, have
e distnction olprocIaimingwithsome precisiontheexasperated consequences
o oicho iniaIprm oltenappecual d unconovei m
Z]erward I I I
cXact 8tatutc Olh8tOr Wmn h8tOr matcra8m ha8 gdOX
ncVcr hthcrtO bccn adcgatc dcbatcd. t 8 ncOmgaubc Wm an
ghO8Ogh gm_mau8m. MarX8m ha8 n th8 n gcrhag8 ct tO
takcWm a duc 8crOu8nc88 t8 cam tO bc a `8ccncc Olh8tOr`. Or
thcgrOudutcOlh8tOrmatcra8mC OnbccarncdbamOdc8t
rc8gcct lOrthcrcatOlt8 twO tcm8. h:8rc8gcct nccc88tatc8a mt
tO thc nOtOn Olmcunt OlthcOr and gractcc. hc _mat gOtca
grObcm8 bclOrc thc ntcmauOna WOrkn_ ca88 n mc wcnucth
ccntur WhO ab8cncc lrOm thc tradtOn Olc8tcm Mam8m ha8
bccn cmgha8Zcd hcm ccrtn rcman 8ub[cct tO t8 r@uauOn. ut
mc act lOm8 and 8hlN Ol t8 c haVc ncVcr ct bccn grOgcr
8mdcd. Xct arcnuncauOn Olmc _cncmand uncrt unVcr8at
mc haVc Oltcn a8crbd tO mc unOn Ol mcOQ and gmctcc ma
acma ad Mam8t8 tO lOu8 mOrc gro8c On mc garucu 8Oca
cOndtOn8 lOr mccmcr_cncc OlrcVOutOnar mcOr and mc8gccuc
8ccnthc grOtOcO8 lOrt8 VadauOn.
h8 8 nOt 8a that twO garatc and 8cacd dOman8 8hOud b
d8tn_u8hcd Wthn h8tOr makra8m - anactVc `gOtc8` and a
ga88Vc `h8tOr thcOnccntrc_OVcmcdbthctda gmctcc8Olthc
ma88c8 thc Othcr dca cmgt tnm thcm. ut t 8 tO gO8c thc
Quc8tOn hthcrtO undu nc_cctcd Olthc rcatOn8hg ~ actua and
gOtcnta - bctwccn `h8tOrO_ragh and `thcOr` Wthn Mam8t
cuturc a8 aWhOc. hc gOuca dctcrmnatOn8 OlmOdcm Wrtn_ Ol
h8tOr Whcthcr Mam8t Or nOn-Mam8t arc8O Wc knOWn that thc
nccd ttc rca88cruOn hcrc. [hc dO nOt OlcOur8ccOn8ututc alOrm
Olthc unt bctwccn thcOr and gractcc n thc c8ca 8cn8c.) hc
h8tOr acQ8tOn8 aVaabc Or nccc88ar lOr mOdcm Wrtn_ n
gOtca OrccOnOmc thcOr Wthn Mam8m haVc nOtbcn 8O Oltcn
cOn8dcrcd. t 8hOud n lact bc cVdcnt thatadVancc8 Wthn MarX8t
h8tOrO_mgh arc gOtcnta Olctt mgOrtancc lOr mc dcVcOg-
mcnt OlMam8tthcOr. 3ct dc8gtc thc lOmatOn OlmajOr 8chOO8 Ol
Mam8t h8tOtO_ragh n ncar a thcadvanccd gta8t cOuntrc8
t cannOt bc8ad that h8tOrca matcra8m a8 a thcOrctca 88tcmha8
bcnchtcd cOmmcn8uratc. hcrc ha8 bcn cOmgaratVc ttc ntc-
_ratOn Ol thc hndn_8 Ol MatX8t h8tOr ntO MarX8t gOt Or
cooVcobooal MarXst accouot8 ol thc uot ol thcor d gracucc wtho
m8torl mtctab8m
I I8
Nnow to datc. h8 anOma aggc8 a thc grcatcr Whcn t 8
ooto matno grOlcOna h8tOrOgragh Olth8tgc cX8tcd n
ccgoOOlc M8mWhct8advcntnaatcrcgOchha8nOt
nodOc chot8 Wthn gO8t-ca88 M8m. cu8c Ol
N noVct mc naturc Ol t8 mgOrt lOr mc 8uucturc Ol h8tOr
m8cN8mB Whochthu8cttO b tthcct,tmght
tmt mc bacc bcwn `h8tOr` and `mor` ma bc
MM8t c ol mc mm atcrn gmnt
O@on
' 1bomcOghM8 8 m Wmch n B matcd mod
won c mO ol mc un ol mUr d gmcdcc 8 ud to
dmoB 8Ocon8tmwnc d`tO` M8m.
b Wn nOt a la onc. Yct hc mwnc ol N grc
MonhO tcnd8 t0 mgt ca Mam8m undu lrom md
.c8ttcr8 gmcd untWththc8gg OlthcWOrkng
ol N dmc WhO gcnunc mndcM t much 8ugcrOr tO thc
on WhO 8uc dcd t, aggcw a 8ndard Ol ab8Outc cOm
ganWthnh8tOr matcra8m Lcc, hOWcvcr, thc mc Olmc
t ol thcOr th gmctcc 8 rcadvbcd, ccn thc at Wa8
mo8tcOandhcrOnkotOthcWOrkngc8mu8tbc8ubjcct
oBcotdmguO8rmcnt. lthcc8 dOc8nOt a8crbc
rlodOn tO ca88ca M8m, thc mt8 tO Whch t rclcr8 c
nmcc gmntcd nda ncOmgctOn8 - m chcct, acunac
WhmmcdWa8amrthcrdcvcOmcntolthcthcOr ,Whchc8tcm
am8m atcr unabc tO achcvc. hc gO88bt that mcrc ma
haVc mcn ccmcnt8 n thc ca88ca hcrtagc WhO Wcrc nOt 8O much
ncOmgctc ncOrrcct 8 nOt takcnWth 8umccnt rOu8nc88. t 8 m
grcCthcaccumuatOn Olh8tOca knOWcdgc abOutthcga8t
that w unavaabc tO thc hr8t gcncmtOn8 OlM8t8 a8 mc vcd
mrOugh t thcr grnt, Whch gct8 d cn[On8 ncW 8ccndhc
ntcOgadOn OlthcrWOrk ta.
n Othcr WOrd8, ca88 M8m 8hOud bc 8ubmttcd tO thc 8amc
rgOrOu8 8cmtn and crt agg a8 thc gO8t-ca88ca uadtOn
mat dcrvcd lrOm t. hc cOugc d m nccdcd tOr 8uch a grO
rammcWOud bmuch grcatcr n mc Olc8tc M8,
Vcn thc vcncratOn Wth Whch nc a 8crOu8 8Oca8t8 havc
atcd mc ca88 ma8tcr8 Olh8tOr matcra8m, and thc abncc
Z)smord t tg
tO datc Olan ntccctua crtguc Olthc8c tbat rcmancd cgua and
rc8Outc mOutOnar n gOtca gO8uOn. hc _rcatc8t rc8gcct 8
hOWcvcr cOmgatbcWth thc _rcatc8t ucdt. hc 8tud Olca88Oa
Mm8m tOda nccd8 a cOmbnatOn Ol hOar knOWcd_c and
8ccgu hOnc8t that t h nOt ct rcvcd. n thc gO8t-War cgOch
mcbc8t andmO8t Or_naWOrknm8hcdha8u8uatakcnthc lOm
on_cnOu8 rcntcrgrctauOn8 OlOnc On tt OrauthOrMam Or
@c8 Or nn tO mmtc cOnVcnuOm nOuOn8 abOut anOthcr Oltcn
Wm thc Ol cOmbaun@ bur_o;8 cruc8m8 Or m8ntcrgrctatOn8
0lM8m 8uch. oagg t 8 n r_ tO NandOn th8 gmcucc
and tO grocd n8tcad tO 8Oum mc Ocnua8 O mc tcXt8 O
OM Mam8m mcmMV WmOut ang grOt a88umguOn Olthcr
n cOhcrcn Ot 0. n fact thc mO8t mgOrtant
rgOn8bt lOr cOntcmgOr 8OOa8t8 ma b tO 8Oatc thc man
morct Wcakn8c8 Olc8 Mam8m tO cXgan thc h8tOr
rca8On8 lOrmc8c and tO mmcd mcm. hcgrc8cncc OlcrrO 8 Onc
Ol thc mark8 Olan 8ccncc: mc grctcncc Olthcr ab8cnOc ha8 mcrc
d8crcdtcdthccam Olh8tOr matcra8mtObOnc. hccu8tOmar
cOmgar8On OlMam Wth LOgcmcu8 Or LacO l t 8 tO bc madc
8hOud b takcn 8crOu8: nO Onc ma_nc8tOda that thcWrtn_8 o
mcadcrarc lrcc lrOmcrucam8Mc8and cOntradctOn8. hcrvcr
8Dm8 a8 gOnccr8 OlmOdcm a8trOnOm Or gh8 8 thc _uamntcc Ol
mc ncvtabt Ol thcr cHOr8 at mc daWn Ol thc dcvcOgmcnt Ola
ncW8ccncc. hc 8amc mu8t bc Uc rioriOlMarX8m. hc ccntm
grObcm8thatarcgO8cdbthcca88catcXNOlm8tradtOnObvOu8
nnOtbccXgOrcdhcrc.OWcvcrmcmtOa88crtthclOmanccc88t
Ol dOn_ 8O WthOut an 8gchuOn WOud bc ttc mOrc than a
tOkcn gct. m cOnOu8On thcrclOrc ccrtan crtOa arca8 Whcrc thc
hcrta_c Ol ca88ca MarX8m aggar8 nadcguatc Or un8at8lactOr
mabc8u__c8tcd.hchcctn_cOmmcnt8tObmadcOnthcmnaturay
dO nOtgrctcndtOagrOgcrtrcatmcntOlthc88uc8cOnOcmcd.hc
mcrcalcWragd8cmaghOrc8OlgrObcm8tO bcOn8dcrcdc8cWhctc.
OrgurgO8c8 OlcOnvcncncc thc W bc cOnhncd tO thcWOrk Olthc
Out8tandn_ uO Olthc ca88 tmdtOn Mam Lcnn and rOt8k.
hc_mamc88 OlMam8 Ovcm achcvcmcntnccd8nOrctcratOn hcrc.
ndccd t Wa8 thc vcr ran_c Ol h8 _cncm V8On Olthc luturc Whch
4
m8nduthcl0lllu80n8dm0g88 nh88nnng
cgNnt0h80Wtmc.Mc0uldn0ttcmNn80g0lulld
Umull 0 t0 thc l8tct wmucth ntut hc h8d n0t 8t
b 0ut08ncht0nWththcl8tctnnctccndntutnWhch
0c lvo. M8 m8tWc8 d 0m880n8 m8 bc 88d t0 h8Vc tgll
b c gt 0h8 0tc8ghb. t 8 thc 8um 08Ocnuhc kn0Wlcdgc
8v8lNlc N0ut c m8t0Q 0gt8l8m ~ 80 much gtc8tct th
8t mdUg0l ~Whch 8h0uldgmt h8t0Hc8l m8tcH8l8m t0d8
m t 8 m m8 mgt th8t ctc W W Whcm
M` w 8gg m nm 8 ontcmg0m
W c
`
',' {l)1mt08mmmOt0thcgMl8tbt8tc. M8cl
dm@ t0 Utb n cho c 8uctum0Wh8tW88 l8tct
mbUUdmwcm0mt8tcd 8nWhcmnut0gc - but
8Nd ghl0ghlmel.hcnn t8q8oh6W0tc 8
n tom 8md oc gmlM mcMtoU8l 8Mtc O8to b
D8glUn n ~ m8 0nl8uchVcnmm. hcmtct hc ncVct
mMl c ngl8h glMcnMt 8Ntc undctWhch hc lVcd
0tcmt0h8 lc.8nmnghctcndcdt0gcnctNzc`0n8g8td8m`
NwVcl thc t@l 0m0thcm0dcmb0utgc088Mtc bu8c0
mg0lulmcm0t0bc0untct-m0luu0n8tt0lcn 8q8.McW88
UmucnUgun8blc t0 8n8l8c thchtd cgublc n t mnCc Whcn t
mctgcd 8tctthcdct 0 8yO. tn8ll bcu0h8gtcoCg8u0n
W `mbM8t` 0n8g8tu8m hc 8m8 b c0nut t0 h8Vc tcndcd t0
undctmtc mgtc88Vc g8ct 0thc `g8Ob8t` ngl8h Lutch
Md ctn 8Mtc8 8t um 8ggc8nng t0 thnk th8t80c8l8mc0uld
b8cVcd n thwc0unuc8 b gc8ccul 8nd clcct0ml mc8n8 8l0nc.
cmultth8tMncctgt0duccd8nc0hctcnt0tc0mg8muVc
Nunt 0 c g0lul 8ucmm8 0 b0urgc08 c888 g0Wct 8t 8ll.
O U8n0Mblcd8junOm bwn h8cml g0ucoghl080ghl
Wung8 d h8l8tctcc0n0mc Wtung8.
[)llcd t0 8lum m8 t0 h8Vcbcn 8n nc0mgtchcn80n 0
much0thcn8mtc0thcl8tctcg0chtht0ughWhchhclVcd.lth0ugh
M 8l0ncnh8 ltc-tmcn undcnt8ndng thccon0mcdn8m-
8m 0 thc gt8l8t m0dc 0 gt0duct0n Ntct 8jO Whch t0
thcW0tld hc m8ncVct t0 h8vc tc@8tctcd thc gtc8t 8ht
m mMu0nN 8Mtc 88tcm mt 0mg8ncd t. hc dctc8t8 0
Z)smord t t
1 q aggcr tO havccOnvnccd M thatbOurgcOsrcvOutOnscOud
nOOngcrOcurbccauscOlthclrthatcagtanOwcvcrywhcrchadOl
abOur {hcncc thc bctrayas n ncc and Lcmany Olthat ycar). n
lact thc rcst Olhs lcwtncsscd asucccssOn Oltrumghantcagtast
rcvOutOns nLcmanytaythc LbA gan and cscwhcrc. hcsc
a Ocurrcd undcr thc nncr OlnatOnasm nOtOldcmOracy. Mam
assumcd that cagtasm wOud grOgrcssvcy mtgatc and annu
natOnaty na ncwunvcrsasm n lact dcvcOgmcntsummOncd
and nlOrccd nauOnasm. Hs nabty tO gcrvc thssutcd n a
r Olgvc gOt mstakdurngthc 1j and Whcnthc
a]Or das Ol LurOgcn gOt Wcrc a ntcrcOnncctcd wth
nauOnastsggcs. HcnhshOst tO thc HsOrgmcntO n my
hsngcctOlbsmsmnLcmanyhsaduabOnOlncOnn thc
Lb and h aggrOva Ol LOmansm n thc akans {thc attcr
dctcmncdbythcOthcr'anchrOnstc'rcOccatOnOlt q hslcar
OHussa.ntra thcOrctcascnccOnthccharactcrOlnatOnsand
natOnasms was clt wth vc damagng cOngucnccs tO atcr
gcnctOns OlsOcasts.
{) hc ccOnOmc archtccturc Ol Capital tl Mam's grcatcst
achcvcmcnt s nOt mmunc tOanumbcrOlgOssbc dOubts. hc mOst
nsstcnt OlthcsccOnccthcv thcOryOlvaucadvanccdby Mam.
gartlrOmthcdmtcsassOcatcd wthhscxcusOnOlsrcyasa
dctcmnant { cl. ardO ) thcrc s thc grObcm Ol thc datng Ol
hc abOur nguts thcscvcs {cl. braha) and abOvc al thc trOubng
dmcuty sO lar OlcOnvcrtng thc attcr ntO grccs s a guanthabc
cdum {n cOndcuOn wth thc nOma nOns Olsccnuhcty and
hc cOnvcnOna cOmgarsOns Olthc dscOvcry Olsurgus-vauc wth
hatOlOxgcn). nOthcruncasyasgcct OlthcwhOcthcOryOlvaucs
hc dsunctOn bctwn grOducuvc and ungrOductvc abOur tscl
whchathOughcsscntatOthasncvcryctbccncOdhcdthcOrcty
O cstabshcd cmgrcay by Mam Or hs succcssOn. hc mOst
hardOus cOncusOns that thc systcm Ol Cqital ycdcd wcrc thc
gcncrathcOrcm Olthc langratc OlgrOht and thc tcnct Olan cvcr-
ncrcasng cass gOaratOn bctwccn bOurgcOsc and grOctaat.
Pcthcr has yct bccn adcguatcy substanuatcd. hc hrst mgcd an
ccOnOmcbrcadOwnOlcagtasmbytsnncrmcchansmsthcsccOnd
asOcabrcakdOwbyylnOtOlanbOnOlthcgrOctat
ntcma changcs wthn thc garty nOt wthn thc cass Or cOunt
thcsnOausOntOsOvctsnhsgOtcaw.hcthcOblaurc
nvOvcd hec may bcrcatcd tO thc gctca mstak cOmmttcd by
Lcnn and thc bOshcvks durng and altcr thc Lv ar n thc
mcrc and usbhtOn Ola gObca rcssOn Ol OggOsbOn that
w grObaby grOvc Ol tcn tO havc bcnunn d trOgdc
whcn Mast hstOrans havchOncsty studcd t.
[) Lcnn startcd hs r by acknOwcdgng thc mndamcnta
hstOr dstnctOnbcmncstm and LastcmLurOgcn 9kat
ta be Oam!. AtvarOusatcrdatcscsccaynL)- #gCatm},
hc audcd tO t agan. but hc ncvcr rOusy madc t an Ob]t Ol
Mst gOb rcccbOn 8 such. t s nOc that gcrhags hs
grcattwOr 5tate Revalatiaa, s hOy gcncrcnudssOn
OldcbOurgcOs statc - whdcOud b anywhc n thcwOrd lrO
thcy n whchhc ats t. n lact thc Hussansmtcwhch had ust
b cmnat bythccbmary HcvOutOn tcgOrydstnct
lmthccman nch Lngsh OrAmcrcanstatwthwhch thc
uOOns lrOm Mam and Lngcs On whch Lcnn cd had bcn
cOnccmcd. bylang tOdcmtalcuda autOcracyuncvOylrOm
bOurgcOs dcmOccy Lcnn nvOuntary gcmtt a cOnstant
cOnmsOn amOng atcr Mast that was chcctvcy tO grcvcnt thcm
lrOm cvcr dcvcOgng a cOgcnt vOutOnary stratcgy n thc t.
hsOud On havbccn dOncOn thc bass Oladrcctand systcmatc
hcOry Ol thc grcscntatvc bOurgcOs-dcmOcratc statc n thc ad-
anccdgtastcOuntrcsandthcsgcchccOmbnatOnsOltsmachncry
lcOnscnt and crcOnwhchwcrclOrcgntOsarsm. hcgctca
OnucccOldsthcOtcabOckagcwasthcnabOldchrd
ntcmatOna lOundcd and gudcd by Lcnn tO achcvc any mass
mgantatOn n thc grcatcst ccnocs Ol mOdcm mgcnasm n thc
mcntcsthcAngO-baxOnwOrd OlLngandand LbA.AnOthcrtygc
Olgarty and anOthcr tygc Olstratcgy wcrc nccdcd n thcsc sOcctcs
and wec nOt nvcntcd. Lcnns ccOnOmcwOrk OnIm
J
rimsm, at thc
bmc whcn t was wrttcn [t6 a cOnsdcbc advancc ncvcrthccss
rcmancd argcy dcscrgtvc and attcr thc ar tcndcd tO suggt an
ncagactyOlmOdcm cagtasmtOrccOvcrlrOmtsdstcnthat lOund
OmcalOrmuatOnnnmcrOusLOmntcmdOcumcnts. Lncc ana
tact ccOnOc tastrOghsm thus ncbOncd tO dsgcnsc sOcast
# f#
llmmmcdhcultwOrkOldcvclOgng8gOtc8thcOrOlthc
bN 8mcwm wth Whch thch8d tO cOntcnd n thc Wcst.
Lttc rOus mcOrctc8 8sscssmcnt Ot rOtsks WOrk h8s ct bccn
mdc. LcuH0hcr8 bOgmgh gtOb8b thc mOst Wdc rc8d tc Ot
wOubOn8Q h8s curOus nOt m n 8comg8ncd Or succccdcd
b cOmg8r8b sstcm8tO stud Ol rOtsks dc8s - gcrh8gs
gM mu ts vcr mcrts h8vc cOn8cd thc ncccsst tOr ths.
LabmctOthcgOtgOcmOltOd8th8nth8tOlthcOthcr
nolthcc8sstmdtOnrOUksWOrknccds8dsgassOn8tc
boat888 ol8 tgc th nOt sO lw gcnc mcvcd. hc
dmcub t
gOw cm tO bthc.
(i}1aotoaOl gcrm8ncnt mvOutOn 8dv8nccd brOtsk
gNaandgmdct thccOumolthc uss8n cvOudOn. grOvcd
O bOurgs rmoutOn OOncd n uss8 nOntcmcd8tc
wgNstsNbtOndcvcOgcd8WOrkng8ssnsunccuOnnst8cd
z gtocst8tcwthn8 lcW mOnthsOlthccnd Ols8rsm8nd ths
8NtccdtOcOnsuctsOc8smOncctW8ssO8tcdn8sngccOuntr.
. "
4
g
J
8g zg
w.
7]
g
7
g
t g 8
g
}
g
gt0q0
M zq
q
*
qg tt8
.
LouYgz
P7
g
}
"
gq~qg
47I4t $7
~g
q
*
g
g
7
8
8t g 8q-g 88og t0zg I
ung T
.
0
w W He e
e e e ztg
rstotcg
ustag8~
_ t
t ]g z
P]
g qg g t
aulg]
achcard_ Laston_ ]y~8
aran_ aul_ q
audclarc_ Lharlcs_ ]_ ]]
aucrg Ltto_ ]-_ t0g tq_ t ]_ zz-_ q_
t0q
cgum_
amn_ altcr_ z]_ z]_ ]_ ]on_
]4
_ ]0_ ]yn_ 8_0_ t0qn
cmstcn_ duard_ ]n_ t
smarck_ Ltto von_ tt
ogdanov_ lcXandcr_ ]n
hm-aWcrkg ugcn von_ _ zz
olhcVsmg t q_ t 8-tg g t 0qg tt 6
t t]
rht, crtoldg ]g ]8
ttang V, z, zq, z8g q]g ]g ]-g
t0z~
]
, tO
)
n, tt]
ukhan, Pkola,]-8, t0, tn, t q-t],
t y, zz, z]
ularag zq
Langulhcm, LOrgcs, ]], ]8n
Lassano, ranco, qzn
Lcon, LmbcrtO, qt
Lhna gt0z t0qg zt
Lollcttg Lucogzg z8gqt-]gq-gq
J
og0g
]
g qng g]
7
n
LommunstartolLcrman [L]g
8g tg z0g og z-]gq
)ommunst aoltcboVcLong
tg
]
t g 8~g qtg
Loccug Pcolasg tt
Lomug ustcg 8
Lrcmonng Lconarog
Loccg cncdcttog zng ]
Luag qq_ mt
Lzcchoslovakag zt-zg zq
Lc cauvOr_ bmOnc_ ]
LcbOrn_ Abram_ 0q0
Lclla YOlQc_ Lalvano_ v_ z]_ z0n_
z]-_ qt~
]
_ ]t_ ]]~q_ ]8n_ _
yt_ ]]_ ]Qn
Lc bancts_ ranccsco_ ]]
Lcscartcs_ cn_ 0qn
Lcutschcr_ saac_ Q8_ to_ _ mo
LieAeue eit ]_ t]n_ 08
Llthc_ lhclm_ ]0
ngcls_ rcdrh_ tg tg t ]
~t]g
zt_ z
y
n_
]]_ ]
_ q0_ )y
0O_ 0qn_ 08_
]t, ]], 80n,
,
t n, t0]~q, t t
], t t
ascsm, z0-t, zq
.
z]8, ] t , qt , q
)
, 8z,
QOj tee alto asm
cucrbach, LudWg, z, ]z, t, ]0
Or, LuscQQc, tn
abcrt, Lutavc,
)
], ]]
rancc, v, z, zt, zq, 8, q],
q
,q]_
)
On,
\
t ,
\
q, )],
t
08, ]z,]],
88, y), t4,
t t ], t t y
ranklurt bchOOl, zt-z, z~q, q], q
y,
)], 0z, ]
, ]
J
n, 8
l ,
8, 88
y]n
rcnch LOmmunst art [L), z],
] ]
g q]g ]
tch boO8t art |
rcud b@mund |y-8 8z-j
UcdM LUr@c8 |
Laan t Odo 8j~
Lam , t t
Lct gc yy
Lmm , t- 8 t
P
t
4
tty
z
P
z z
4
z
8 0
)
z-| yn
4
4|
4
y jo j
t
P
t0z t ty
t tQ-tz0
L0thc o@@ y
Lodm LuO zy jP j8 0g
yy0 y
Lram8m tono V zj-y z8n zQ-
z 4P
t
4
4|
t
j
j
4
-8 y
~
y
W
y|
7
8o 88
t0
4
-
j
Lrccc
4
z
LtossD Mtk zz- z-
4
yn
t0q
Lrnbct@ Lar zt z-
LuMtm otbctt j
M8mctoWcodorc n
Mc@c Lcot@ hcm tcdtch z
y
t
|
z
J
y
P
)
Mcdcggcr MaHn yn
|y
Mlcrdng udol y-t0 t
4
ty z
t
4
Q
Mndnc88 Mr t t on
Mr8tau Mon
Mtcr dol QQn
MjcmscV Lous |8n
Mobbc8 hom 8n
Moand
Morkhcmcr Max zj zn z
4
8t 8zn8QQn
Morth Mko8 t
Mumc L8vd o
MungM tty zo z
4
z
P
t
)
8
^
Q
4!
4J4
4
Q
t
jon
Mungar Lommun8t art 0 n
Mussct dmund |y
nda t t8
n8ttutcolbocac8carch8cctrk-
lurt bchOO
ntcmatona r8t z
J
j bccond z
! J
t
4
z
4
Q
J
n
4
n 8 y8 Q
J
j
htd tyt8
zo
l
Pl
4J
8
,
Qz
,
Q8 t0 t ty t z0j tourth
Q8
taV
j,
ty
t 8
,
zo
,
z
4,
zy8
,
P
z,
4
P
J
4
|
t 4
y j
P
n jJ
t
j j
n
)
y-8yzyy 8j
zn
| t0z
M Lommw8t Mt [L] z8
P
t
4P
z
4|- y|n
an boca8t art [b] j- t 8
zy
zn
g8mc8on tcdctc y8n
g8Q
4
y |
a8gcm ar yn
am8 gcan j
gam8tdn zn
8ccm mch8
4
yn
t Ou0
y
4
n 0g y
ut8K ar j- 8
t
4
4
|
n 8 Q
cc8 gom m8n8td z
4
ctk@88tdbatcnz-y
ojvc cxdrc y
or8ch ar zj zn zy z
y
0 z
9
|
J
0y
or8ndtc
Lbroa ntono j- 8 tyz8nq
4
t tn
t t0
4
n
Lacan ]acguc8 |y j8n
La8k m |
LclcbVrcMcnt zjzy
|
8
4
t
j
P
t
|8
Lt Lggo8uon t t0t
Lcbnz Lottlrcd hcm 0
Lcnn admr ch y
t t 8
tQ
zy
4
8 |yn jQn tn 8 yt
t
Q0 QQ
t
t0
)|
t
J J
]
t
t t
ty t t8-
t z0
Lcogard Lacomo Qtn
LcV au tn
Lncon bt8h8m t t |
Lukc8 Lcorg V zj
zQ
J
z
t
4
z
4
|
J
t
|)4
|
8
P
r
Q
y0 y yQn Q t0
4
n
Luxcmburg o8a y8 t0 tz t
4
t
zz
4
yn
4
Q 8 t0
4
n
Mach rnst j
n
Machtavc PccoyyQ
Mahcr Lu8tav y
Maarmc btcghanc
Maraux odrc
M8ndc mc8t QQto
m8nn
,
homa8 y
,H 3j ~q q~
9t
j
P
l j j7~8
,
4
,
#
o
, 8
~q 88
l
W
Mtov uu ljn
H N
l~l
l
j zl
J
j 8
q8 j j8 yo yz yjn y8
7
t
]
to~
} ,
t t t~t
4
t t~zt
M-n@8 nc [Mo) tj
zt jo8
Mchrn@ j tq 8 toq
Mcr PCoo qt
Mcrcau-onQ MaurCc y~8 jt
Mondolo odolo qo
Monc Lhar monda
y
Mos jn
Mososka Pac zz~
_qyn
M to W
Dagocon t t q
DMsm zz
~
q t ~q jo
7
8 t
t t
Dch rcdCh
D a j_
LCtobr vouton v t q
~t 8 zy
qz, y, 8 toq t ttg
as Lomun z~ y
asCa as y
asua Lorgo zn
agt ]an 8
trana Lo qt
ato 6
khanov Lorg j- 8 tq qn
8 y, toq
oand t t 8 zz zqqyn8
osh Lommust arQ zz q] 8
to
or Mnr ] j- n
oQuar ront @, y t t
ortuga
3
o
ouantzas PCos toz
robahns Lvgn y-8 t j t
roCacm Luano n
roudon rr ]osQh z
aCn ]an y
va ]os jqn
Cardo )avd j, yjn 8j t t j
Chrs Lhrstan qon
odosk o lo
oss o ql
oussau w-aC y
umana zq
ussa j 8
~zoq8 8y 8o y l o
~
l oq t t l j $88 wo Lbb
uw boCa-)moOatC abo
art [bLL) j 8 tjn
gov Lavd t j t zt z 8
qj0 8
bMc gcan-au z n y-8
q~q j
P
t ~g y~8 0 z
o yz yy8jj tto1
bmndnaa toz
bChcn@ O hcm goscgh
y, 8
bChr rdrCh y
bChumgtr osgh tyn j 8
bCott atr y
bv LuCcn jq
bmm or@ 0
ba-LmoCratC arQ ol Lrmang
[bL) j 8 t ~tq ~q q
boCa-LmoCratC art oloand 8
bozhntsnAandry
bor Lorgs 8
Qan
3
o zy
3
8 qz y t
P
t t
bQnoza aruCh q- y 8j
braa ro
7
jn t t j
btan osQh YsonovCh t~zt
zj, z
8 n t
0)
~q
btrg rtz zz
bwz ad zq j toq
bwrand zzn zz zy j 8
arbuCk n ton
Qanaro bbastano n tn
ntortto ]aCoQo yy
ogat amro t
rotsk Lon y-8 t t-tz t n t q
tj t 8-t 8n tt toq t t t
t t8-zt
ugan-aranovsk Mkha tyn z
urat QQo j n
Lkran t]8 t
Lnamuno Mgu d z8n
Lntd btat q z~q o z~q q-
qy jon ~t
toz~ t ty
Lbb t~1t
,
z-j
3,
qz~q j
8n z ~8 tz t t t zzt
o
YI,
8@ncr ch8rd
cbcr m n
8moWU LlrCh Von
9
2b
l8ms 8gmond tojn
0rd 8t Luc y totq I
g 2yg
m l zJ
t t j W M Wo 2q 2y~
2
9
q
J
q
"
q
9t
t 99
t
P
t
9
t20
3u@o88W8 2q q2
hd8noV8m y q0