Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Issn 0012-9976
Ever since the rst issue in 1966, EPW has been Indias premier journal for comment on current affairs and research in the social sciences. It succeeded Economic Weekly (1949-1965), which was launched and shepherded by Sachin Chaudhuri, who was also the founder-editor of EPW. As editor for thirty-ve years (1969-2004) Krishna Raj gave EPW the reputation it now enjoys.
editor
C Rammanohar Reddy
Deputy Editor
Bernard DMello
web Editor
subhash rai
chief copy editor
roger alexander
Senior Assistant Editors
P S Leela
editorial Assistant
lubna duggal
production
Kamal G Fanibanda
General Manager & Publisher
K Vijayakumar
editorial
edit@epw.in
Circulation
circulation@epw.in
of the Karnataka Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act 1981, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. We are dismayed at the response of the Mangalore police to a conscientious journalist for reporting a crime. The police in their charge sheet accused Soorinje of absconding, a submission that led the court to issue a warrant for his arrest. This despite the fact that throughout the investigation Soorinje was cooperating and providing crucial evidence to the police even as he was reporting from various parts of the district on a daily basis. Signicantly, Vijay Kumar, the person whose complaint led to Soorinje being listed as an accused, has gone on record to say that he made no such allegation. These facts and Soorinjes unblemished professional record which is substantiated by his dogged reportage on religious extremism of all hues in coastal Karnataka lead us to believe that he has been wrongly indicted by the police and that there are strong grounds for the state government to re-examine the case and drop the charges foisted against him. We unequivocally endorse the campaign seeking Naveen Soorinjes release and consider his incarceration a dangerous violation of the freedom of the press. After all, what kind of justice dictates that the whistle-blower and criminals share space in the same jail?
Ammu Joseph, N Bhanutej, Sugata Srinivasaraju, Gauri Lankesh, Anant Chinivar, Lakshman Hoogar, T M Veera Raghavan, Sevanti Ninan, Geetha Seshu, Meena Menon
Advertising
advertisement@epw.in
Bhagalpur Redux
Director
k kanagasabapathy
C 212, Akurli Industrial Estate Kandivali (East), Mumbai 400 101 Phones: (022) 2887 3038/41 Fax: (022) 2887 3038 epwrf@vsnl.com
Printed by K Vijayakumar at Modern Arts and Industries, 151, A-Z Industrial Estate, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 and published by him on behalf of Sameeksha Trust from 320-321, A-Z Industrial Estate, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013. Editor: C Rammanohar Reddy.
was moved reading Warisha Farasats article on Bhagalpur riots (The Forgotten Carnage of Bhagalpur, EPW, 19 January 2013), particularly as I belong to Bhagalpur. I recall how during my early school days there (mid-1950s) Bengalis and Muslims had joined hands to protest against the abolition of Bengali and Urdu as mediums of instruction at the secondary school level. As a result the Bihar government withdrew its order. But those were better days, even though the Partition
vol xlviII no 5
EPW Economic & Political Weekly
LETTERS
memory was still fresh in peoples minds. What obviously mattered was how the central leadership tried to create an atmosphere of inter-communal harmony against all odds. Conversely, the fashion now is to see massive riots take place at routine intervals (1983 Nellie massacre of Muslims with 3,000 deaths, 1984 anti-Sikh riots of Delhi with 2,000 deaths, 1989 anti-Muslim Bhagalpur riots with 1,000-2,000 deaths, and the 2002 anti-Muslim riots of Gujarat with 2,000 deaths). This is followed by the institution of enquiry commissions which are so long-drawn that they suffer from, what we call in legal language, the law of limitation. Why cannot we pre-empt and prevent riots rather than merely do a post-mortem on them? Let us work out a system that if any riot is not controlled within 72 hours with the death toll below 20, it would lead to the immediate suspension of 10 topranking district ofcials. They would defend their conduct only after suspension and their due reinstatement would follow only if found not guilty of dereliction of duty. Enough is enough for a democracy that does not tire to boast of its accomplishments everyday.
Partha S Ghosh Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
New Delhi
suitable accommodation with wheelchair access and within close proximity of his workplace on a permanent basis. Till such time the university must allow Saibaba the continued use of his current accommodation. The DUTA will resolutely oppose, through public campaigns and agitations, any move by the university to displace Saibaba or threaten him and attack his sense of dignity in any manner whatsoever. The DUTA has also resolved to constitute a special subcommittee to frame an integral list of demands for the disabled members of Delhi University and to pursue them at the highest levels.
Amar Deo Sharma, S D Siddiqui Delhi University Teachers Association
Evicting Disabled
he Delhi University Teachers Association (DUTA) held an emergency meeting of its executive committee to discuss the disturbing and agonising circumstances that have been forced upon a teacher of the university, G N Saibaba, as a result of the universitys decision to forcibly evict him from his current residence in the Wardens Quarters at Gwyer Hall Hostel without rehabilitating him in a suitable alternative accommodation with wheelchair access. It should be noted that with Saibabas appeal against eviction still pending in the court of the chief commissioner on persons with disability, the university had no legal right to insist on eviction. Under the provisions of the Persons with Disability Act of 1995, the university is duty-bound to provide Saibaba with
Economic & Political Weekly EPW
aibanna Ningapappa Natikar is at an imminent risk of execution. He had petitioned President Pranab Mukherjee for mercy, but the President rejected the petition on 4 January 2013. He was sentenced to death in 2005 for the 1994 murder of his second wife and daughter. At the time of the crime, he had been free on parole from a life sentence for the murder of his rst wife. The Supreme Court rejected an appeal in 2005. Fourteen former judges recently asked the President to commute the death sentences of Saibanna Ningapappa Natikar and 12 others as they had been wrongly
imposed. The judges pointed out that the reasoning underlying the Supreme Courts conrmation of Saibannas death sentence in 2005 implied that capital punishment was mandatory for any prisoner convicted of a second offence that merited a life sentence, and violated a Supreme Court decision from 1983. The Supreme Court had itself acknowledged the error in its reasoning on Saibannas case in 2009. We request all citizens to write to the President, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde with the following points: (i) to stop plans to execute Saibanna Ningapappa Natikar, or any other person; (ii) urging them to commute all death sentences to terms of imprisonment; (iii) reminding them that the UN General Assembly has called repeatedly for a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty, and pointing out that Indias decision to resume executions has set it against the global trend towards abolition. The addresses to write to are President Pranab Mukherjee, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi 110 004, Fax: +91 11 23017290; Manmohan Singh, South Block, Raisina Hill, New Delhi 110 001, Fax: +91 11 23019545; Sushilkumar Shinde, 104, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi 110 001, Fax: + 91 11 23094221, Email: hm@nic.in
Amnesty International India
Bangalore
Web Exclusives
The following articles have been uploaded in the past week in the Web Exclusives section of the EPW website. They have not been published in the print edition. Read them at http://epw.in (1) The Discontents After the Revolution Aditya Adhikari (2) Piracy and Its Discontents Rajshree Chandra (3) Skirmishing on the Line of Control Pavan Nair (4) Run with Gender, Hunt with Class: Curious Ways of Indian Democracy from India Gate to the Slum Habitat Prachee Sinha Articles posted before 26 January 2013 remain available in the Web Exclusives section.
february 2, 2013
vol xlviII no 5
LETTERS
Subscription Rates
(Revised rates effective January 1, 2013)
Web Edition/Digital Archives
Print + Digital Archives 1,200
The full content of the EPW and the entire archives are also available to those who do not wish to subscribe to the print edition.
Category India (in Rs) Number of Concurrent Users Up to Five Six to 10 More than 10 Individuals Single User 2,500 4,000 6,000 1,000 More than 10 Single User 50 20 SAARC (in US $) Number of Concurrent Users Rest of the World (in US $) Number of Concurrent Users Up to Five Six to 10 More than 10 Single User 200 320 410 40
Institutions
Concessional rates are restricted to students, teachers and researchers in India. To subscribe at concessional rates, please submit proof of eligibility from an institution. Print Edition: All subscribers to the print edition can download from the web, without making any extra payment, articles published in the previous two calendar years. Print plus Digital Archives: Subscriber receives the print copy and has access to the entire archives on the EPW web site.
How to Subscribe:
Payment can be made by either sending a demand draft/cheque in favour of Economic and Political Weekly or by making online payment with a credit card/net banking on our secure site at www.epw.in. (For Inland subscriptions if making payment by cheque, please add Rs 35 to cheques drawn on banks outside Mumbai, when collection is not at par).
Print Edition For SAARC and Rest of the World (Air Mail)
Airmail Subscription for One Year (in US $)
Print (Plus free web access to issues of previous two years) Institutions SAARC Rest of the World Individuals SAARC Rest of the World 140 250 110 170 Print + Digital Archives (According to Number of Concurrent Users) Up to 5 300 6 to 10 400 More than 10 Single User 160 500 120 200
General Guidelines
Writers are requested to provide full details for correspondence: postal address, day-time phone numbers and email address. EPW requests writers not to send revised versions based on stylistic changes/additions, deletions of references, minor changes, etc, as this poses challenges in processing. Revised versions will not be processed. When there are major developments in the field of study after the first submission, authors can send a revised version.
Special Articles
welcomes original research papers in any of the social sciences. Articles must be no more than 8,000 words, including notes and references. Longer articles will not be processed. Contributions should be sent preferably by email. Special articles should be accompanied by an abstract of a maximum of 150-200 words. Papers should not have been simultaneously submitted for publication to another journal or newspaper. If the paper has appeared earlier in a different version, we would appreciate a copy of this along with the submitted paper. Graphs and charts need to be prepared in MS Office (Word/Excel) and not in jpeg or other formats. Receipt of articles will be immediately acknowledged by email. Every effort is taken to complete early processing of the papers we receive. However, we receive 70 articles every week and adequate time has to be provided for internal reading and external refereeing. It can therefore take up to four months for a final
EPW
Commentary
EPW
invites short contributions to the Commentary section on topical social, economic and political developments. These should ideally be between 1,000 and 2,500 words. A decision on Commentary-length articles will be communicated within 6-8 weeks, or earlier.
Copyright
EPW posts all published articles on its website and may reproduce them on CDs. EPW also posts all published articles on select databases. Copyright of all articles published in the Journal belongs to the author or to the organisation where the author is employed as determined by the authors terms of employment.
Keywords
Authors are requested to list six to eight keywords for their articles.
Book Reviews
EPW
sends out books for review. It does not normally accept unsolicited reviews. However, all reviews that are received are read with interest and unsolicited review on occasion is considered for publication.
Discussion
encourages researchers to comment on articles published in EPW. Submissions should be 800 to 1,600 words.
EPW
Letters
Readers of EPW are encouraged to comment (300 words) on published articles. All letters should have the writers full name and postal address.
february 2, 2013