Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
behavior, decision-making styles have received significant attention from consumer behavior researchers. Decision-making style research suggests that consumers approach shopping with certain decision-making traits that combine to form a consumers decision-making style. Purchases could involve habitual decision making or extended problem solving or anywhere in between these two extremes. The purchase of airline tickets should be considered at the higher end of this continuum. Airline consumers not only seek to reach their destination safely, but also want to do so in comfort and style. This is essentially the core value and benefit of airline services. Each of the several components of airline services and the travel experience offer different levels of benefits depending on the relative importance the passenger gives to each of them and the type of passenger he or she is. We shall divide them broadly into business and economy class passengers. In a research article by (Vohs, Schmeichel, Nelson, Baumeister, Twenge and Tice, 2008) found that decision making and self-control are both prominent aspects of the selfs executive function. It is therefore useful to recognize that they draw on a common psychological resource and that one may affect the other. In particular, making many decisions leaves the person in a depleted state and hence less likely to exert selfcontrol effectively. The common resource needed for self-control, active initiative, and effortful decision making may deserve recognition as an important aspect of self and personality. When consumers make decisions, a more realistic approach may be to use linguistic (natural language) assessments to express thinking and subjective perception (Chiang, Lee, Miaoli and Tzeng, 2009). Carey, Shaw and Shiu (2008) tell that the impact of a changed family environment, combined with the consideration of often complex ethical issues, highlights the potential for significant changes in consumer decision-making. A communal slant including societal pressures and worklife balance issues, and a
familial approach including family structure, the marital role and the level of childrens influence on the decision-making process
According to (Chen, Peng and Hackley 2008) the service quality and marketing of the airline industry also changed rapidly. In the early days, airlines placed a heavy emphasis on service quality because it was a luxurious leisure pursuit. Then, it became a secondary focus when it entered the oligopoly stage. During this stage, price and price wars were the primary concern of the travellers and the airline companies. In a research article by (Harcar and Yucelt, 2012) the use of the Internet as an airline ticket purchase channel is not fully developed, because consumers use the Internet for research of airlines and airfare not for purchase of tickets as like many product and service categories. Consumers pull for online content they decide when, where, what, and how much commercial content they wish to view. Airline service however, may be experienced and perceived at a highly individualistic level, and unless one is strictly looking for the best value for money involving the balancing factor of price. Consensus reveals that the official reporting of incidents is often forgotten, undertaken incorrectly or, in some cases, actively downplayed by airline managers who do not wish the airline to be notorious for disruptive passenger incidents (Rhoden, Ralston and Ineson, 2008). Oyewole, Sankaran and Choudhury (2007) tell that to realize the corporate objective of any air transport organization, the style of operation of every wing of the airline has to be cut out properly. That the customer is the important person to any business undertaking is a fact that needs no overemphasis. Liou, Tsai, Lin and Tzeng (2010) in their studies found that the analysis provides airlines with summaries of their weaknesses and suggestions for improvement. They have isolated important items on which airlines may wish to focus and those in which airlines have already done well and can reduce their efforts without affecting the overall service level.
(Berry, 1992, as cited in Ciliberto and Tamer, 2009, p. 1806) showed that firm observable heterogeneity, such as airport presence, plays an important role in determining airline profitability, providing support to the studies that show a strong positive relationship between airport presence and airline fares. The outcome of the inflight experience and whether a consumer is satisfied or dissatisfied is closely linked to repeat purchase and long-term loyalty. In todays modern world, social class and status are not portrayed through ones travel preferences. A lot of top business executives and celebrities or sportspersons deliberately travel economy class to portray a down to earth, thrifty or simplistic living attitude.
4.0 Conclusion
As a conclusion, for marketers it is important to understand how consumers treat the purchase decisions they face. If a company is targeting customers who feel a purchase decision is difficult, their marketing strategy may vary greatly from a company targeting customers who view the purchase decision as routine. Consumer decision making can be heavily influenced by advertising and personal attitudes formed, especially after a positive or negative experience. The implication of buying behavior for marketers is that different buying situations require different marketing efforts especially in buying the airline ticket or using airline service.
Consumer Decision-Making in Airline Services References Asif, Z.Z., & Abd., R.R. (2007). The Truths of Service Quality (Passenger Handling) in Airlines Industry: A Descriptive Exploration Between Malaysia Airlines and Air Asia. The Journal of Global Business Management, 3 (1), 1.
Boom, W.H.V. (2011). Price Intransparency, Consumer Decision Making and European Consumer Law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 3, 361. Carey, L., Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2008). The Impact of Ethical Concerns on Family Consumer Decision-Making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32 (5), 553. Chen, A.H., Peng, N., & Hackley, C. (2008). Evaluating Service Marketing in Airline Industry and its Influence on Student Passengers Purchasing Behaviour-using Taipei-London Route as an example. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 25 (1), 2. Chiang, C., Lee.C.C., Miaoli, I.L., & Tzeng, G.H. (2009). A Non-Additive Model for the Evaluation of Portal Website Service Quality. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 26 (5), 356. Ciliberto, F., & Tamer, E. (2009). Market Structure and Multiple Equilibria in Airline Markets. Journal of The Econometric Society, 77 (6), 1806. Harcar, T., & Yucelt, U. (2012). American Consumers Attitudes towards Different Airline Companies Channels: A Comparison of transaction Methods. Special issue, 10 (2), 60. Huang, Y.K. (2009). The Effect of Airline Service Quality on Passengers Behavioural Intentions Using SERVQUAL Scores: A TAIWAN Case Study. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8. Liou, J.J.H., Tsai C.Y., Lin, R.H., & Tzeng, G.H. (2010). A modified VIKOR multiplecriteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17 (2), 5.
Consumer Decision-Making in Airline Services Liou, J.J.H., Yen, L., & Tzeng, G.H. (2009). Using decision rules to achieve mass
customization of airline services. European Journal of Operational Research, 205 (3), 4. Maznah, W.O., Mohd Noor, M.A., Zaliha, H.H., & Hasni, A.R. (2009). Decision Orientations towards Shopping and Buying among Young-Adult Malays in the Universities. International Journal of Business and Management, 4 (7), 27. Oyewole, P., Sankaran, M., and Choudhury, P. (2007). Marketing Airline Services In Malaysia: A Consumer Satisfaction Orientation Approach. Innovative Marketing, 3 (1), 56. Park, Y.A., & Gretzel, U. (2011). Influence of Consumers Online Decision-Making Style on Comparison Shopping Proneness and Perceived Usefulness of Comparison Shopping Tools. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11 (4), 342-343. Rhoden, S., Ralston, R., & Ineson, E.M. (2008). Cabin crew training to control disruptive airline passenger behavior: A cause for tourism concern? Tourism Management, 29, 539. Vohs, D.K., Schmeichel, B.J., Nelson, N.M., Baumeister, R.F., Twenge, J.M., &Tice, D.M. (2008). Making Choices Impairs Subsequent Self-Control: A LimitedResource Account of Decision Making, Self-Regulation, and Active Initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 (5), 897.