Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
TFIT-JTTW
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCING TOLERANCING OF FORM, ORIENTATION, LOCATION AND RUN-OUT VERIFICATION PRINCIPLES AND METHODS GUIDELINES
Ics
01.100.20
@ BIS 2001
BUREAU
MANAK
OF
BHAVAN,
INDIAN
STANDARDS
ZAFAR MARG
November ,2001
Price Group
15
BP 24
NATIONAL
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard which is identical with lSO/TR 5460:1985 Technical drawings Geometrical tolerancing Tolerancing of form, orientation, location and run-out Verification principles and methods Guidelines issued by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards on the recommendation of Drawings Sectional Committee and approval of the Basic and Production Engineering Division Council. This standard establishes guidelines for verifying geometrical tolerancing as described in IS 8000 (Part 1): 1985 Geometrical tolerancing on technical drawings: Part 1 Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out and appropriate geometrical definitions (first revision). The purpose is to outline the fundamentals of various verification principles which may be used in order to comply with the definitions of IS 8000 (Part 1) :1985. The verification methods described in this standard do not provide for a unique interpretation of the requirements of IS 8000 (Part 1): 1985 and do differ amongst themselves. This standard may, however, be used as a reference document for coordination and agreements in the field of geometrical tolerancing verification. The symbology and methods mentioned are not illustrated in detail and are not inclined for application on end-product drawings. Not all verification principles are given in this standard for the different types of geometrical tolerances. Within the verification principle one or more verification methods are used. The numbering of verification principles and methods shall not be regarded as a classification of priority within the prescribed type of geometrical tolerance. The information as given in the introduction of lSO/TR 5460:1985 is given below:
In 1972, lSO/TC 10, Technics/ drawings, initiated work on preparing an International Standard on verification principles and methods for geometrical tolerancing. In the early stages of the work it became clear that several alternative verification methods for measuring principles were necessary so as to take account of the different types of workplaces and measuring equipment used. Since there is little experience in the various countries as to how to apply verification principles and methods on geometrical tolerances, it was decided that the results of the work would not be published as an International Standard for the time being. It was felt, however, that the results of the work should be published in the form of a Technical Report as this could be used as a guide towards understanding how to apply the tolerancing system for form, orientation, location and run-out with respect to varying measurement conditions. For uniformity all figures in this Technical Report are in first angle projection. It should be understood that the third angle projection could equally well have been used without prejudice to the principles established. For the definitive presentation (proportions and dimensions) of symbols for geometrical tolerancing, see ISO 7083. The text of ISO Standard has been approved as suitable for publication as Indian Standard without deviations. In this adopted standard, certain terminology and conventions are not identical to those used in Indian Standards. Attention is particularly drawn to the following: a) Wherever the words Technical as Indian Standard. Report appear referring to this standard, they should be read
b) Comma (,) has been used as a decimal marker while in Indian Standards the current practice is to use a full point (.) as the decimal marker.
Page
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.. ....... ...
.. .... .
... .... ..
. ... .. .
...
..... .. .
3 3 4
.... ... .
. ... ..
. . .
5 6 13 15
Establishment Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification Verification
... . . . .
. .. .
... ... ..
....
20 25
31 34 37 40 45 50 53 56 61 63 66 71
ofany ofany
..
... .
of parallelism
.. .. .. . .. .. .. .
. ...
.. .. .. .
.... ....
... ..
. ... . .....
.. .. ..... . ...
.... .
...........................................
....................................
run-out
run-out
..............................................................................
1985
Indian Standard
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCING TOLERANCING OF FORM, ORIENTATION, LOCATION AND RUN-OUT VERIFICATION PRINCIPLES AND METHODS GUIDELINES
1
1.1
of application
guidelines for verifying geometrical tolerancing as described in ISO 1101. The purpose is to of ISO 1101. The of ISO 1101 and and
Report establishes
principles which may be used in order to comply with the definitions Report do not provide for a unique interpretation Report may, however, verification. drawings. The symbology (See also 6.4. ) and methods of the requirements document be used as a reference
for coordination
tolerancing
mentioned
on end-product
1.2
principles
types of geometrical
tolerances.
Within
the
verification
1.3
The numbering
of verification tolerance.
principles
and methods
as a classification
type of geometrical
References
Technical symbols, Technical Methods drawings indications drawings Geometrical on drawings. Geometrical tolerancing Maximum material principle. 1} Measurement Measurement of variations in radius. methods. tolerancing Tolerancing of form, orientation, location and run-out Generalities,
of departure of departure
Geometrical Symbols
tolerancing
tolerances.
for geometrical
tolerancing
and dimensions.
1)
3
3.1
Definitions
verification principle : Fundamental geometrical basis for the verification of the considered geometrical characteristic.
NOTE The inspection methods may not always fully check the requirements indicated on the drawing. Whether or not such methods are sufficient and acceptable depends on the actual deviations from the ideal form and on the manufacturing and inspection circumstances.
3.2
verification
method
: Practical
application
of the principle
equipment
and operations.
3.3
verification
equipment
: Technical
device necessary
for a specific
method
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
Symbols
in table 1 are applied throughout this Technical Table Svmbol ,-- I Surface plate (Measuring plane) Report. 1 Interswetation
>
////
/-/
2 A /
Fixed support
3 A 4 /
Adjustable support
6 x
v, 7 L x
Turning
/\ / A
Intermittent turning
10 0.
Rotation
11 ?
Indicator or recorder
.4 12 f
Meaauring stand with indicator or recorder Symbols for measuring stands can be drawn in different ways in accordance with the verification equipment used.
5
5.1
Establishment
Datum
of datums
indication
on a drawing is a theoretically exact geometric reference from which required characteristics of related features
The datum
indicated
are dimensioned. Thedatumfeature isa real feature of a part which feature is marked onthedrawing as a datum. requirements. requirements, If the verification such achange can be could be
andthetoleranced
affecting
toestablish
adatumfrom
a datum
feature,
touseasimulated requirements.
datum
accurate
in accordance procedure.
It is necessary
into consideration
verification
The datum feature shall be arranged possible value. mentof Practically, feature thedatum thedatum
in such way that the maximum feature shall give astable datum feature
contact
either bythedatum
toasimulated
[see figure
+&---l
.~ Simulated datum feature
L_.uppo_/
Figure la) Figure 1 b)
5.2
Apointas
thedatum
the datum
isquite unusual butcanbe used, forexample inconnection Inmost with position tolerances, cases, thedatum However, itisdifficultto verifi-
Apointas
dstumby
establishment
ofasimulated
datum feature.
isestablished
byasimulated
/2\
R:-~oJQrE
smallest circumscribed sphere (representing the smallest circumscribed sphere) on the V-block
5.3
with figure 3.
A
P
Cylindrical mandrel
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
Insome
cases, thealignment
ofdatum
features
istime-consuming
andcanbe
replaced
bymathematical
orgraphical
evaluation
(s=
figure 4).
\
\
rl
1 Figure4 Profile diegram forgraphical avaluationof datum inthewme diagram. NOTE When graphical evaluation is used, thedatum andthetoleranced feature can beindicated 5.3.2 An axis as the datum is always an unreal feature and shall be established by a simulated datum feature or by mathematical An axis as the datum lation. An axis as the datum The datum may well be used for both internal and external is usually established b~ an inscribed features. feature of a geometrically correct form. for an internal feature For cylindrical holes, the datum can be established by a cylindrical mandrel of the largest inscribed size or by an expandable If the mandrel cannot achieve a stable position in the hole, the location shall be adjusted it in any direction is equalized (see figure 5).
I i
calcu-
mandrel. of
I .Ir
Datum feature Simulated datum feature= ~Extreme orientations
~Datum
Figure5
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
A simplified way to establish an axis for internal features can be used by aligning it between In this case, the eventual datum. eccentricity of the chamfer to the hole itself may constitute
1-
Datum
asthedatum
feature
(internal features)
of a geometrically correct form, size or bv a collet
by a circumscribing encircling
by a cylindrically
If the position of the gauge is not stable, it shall be adjusted ed. (Same Thedatum principle asinfigure forcylindrical 5.) &established
of it in any direction
is equaliz-
. P
. A
V-block
shaRsmay
inasimplified
V-blocks,
V-yokes,
L-blocks or L-yokes
..
7
1
I 1- /// L-block
F
ba
A8
V-yokes
L-yokes
Figure7
asthedatum
(external features)
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
Depending which
also affects
by graphical
evaluation,
for example
in accordance
with figure 8.
G c1 I
$?
I
I
Tolerance feature
Section B
+?.
~ I I Section A
&
Section B //
Figure 8a)
5.3.3
circumscribing
or expandable). of the datum features will affect the position of the common axis which can also affect the
features.
10
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
The guidance
datum
features
are coaxial
Two smallest circumscribing and coaxial cylinders = Simulated datum feature r r-Datum A-B 1
I
1 / .
Datum feature Ad
Datum feature B ~
may beused(eee
also figure 7). byacoaxial centres pair of conical centres. andthe datum shall beadded tothemeasured valueof thetoleranced
can reestablished
that thedeviations
beWeenthe
L
5.4 A surface as the datum
as the datum
Whan
the datum
is a plane,
it can be established
in accordance
with
in a simplified way by three supports (points) situated as far as possible from each other on
of the simulated
11
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
5.5
Multiple
datums
of two or more datum features, their sequence may be important (see figure 11).
If the datum
consists
-Primary
datum feature
~Secondary
datum feature
/////////////////////
////
F@urell
influence onthetoleranced feature depending on the sequence of the datum faaturas usad on tha tolaranced faatura
12
If the datum consists of three datum features, figure 12a). The secondary [see figure 12c)l.
it should be noted that the primary datum feature (A) can be aligned in accordance
with
datum feature shall be aligned on two points [see figure 12b)l and the tertiary datum feature on one point
p-p?j?J
A
Figure Secondary datum plane (2 points) 904 ./&. . i . s
@y12a)
90
point)
Figure 12b)
Figure 12c)
6 6.1
Verification
The verification principles
verification
headings. methods are shown in association of verification : equipment with particular application Comments examples arranged
For each verification in order of tolerance The resulting tabular Headings Symbol Tolerance Verification Comments
a number of verification
an example
is outlined.
characteristics
example
Symbol Tolerance
geometric
characteristics shows,
in conformity
with ISO 1101. zone, in accordance with ISO 1101, and, insufficient in
example
an application
example which is the same as that shown in I SO 1101. When this example examples have been added.
the methods
Verification
method
the number
characteristics
of the verification
the readings to be taken; the required the treatment the acceptance repetitions; of the readings obtained; with the measured value.
criteria associated
13
The column .
Commentsg
ivessupplementaryi
nformation,
for example
a particular
6.2
ltshould
benoted
of the following
ksicverification
factors
verification verification
equipment performance
verification
equipment. influence on the measuring result than the difference between the verification methods
have a greater
6.3
theverification benot4that
principl% theexamples
Most
of these
various verification
equipment.
is shown,
6.4
The
numbering
adopted
in this Technical
Report :
was
chosen
purposes.
The clauses
geometrical
characteristics
denotes
thegeometrical principle;
tolerance
to rechecked;
digit (starting
the verification
with
1) denotaa
the verification
method
principle.
Verification Examples:
to the methods
is not numbered.
forstraightness forparallelism
7)means
verification
forstraightn~ forparalletism
on end-product method
as a modifier asuaad
ancingraquirements.
However,
may beu40ndetivd
by manufacturing
as an indication
of the method
straightness, parallelism,
14
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
7
7.1
Verification of straightness
Principle 1 Verifying straightness deviations by comparing witha straight element
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
a
Place the gauge maximum minimum, The between on the object between straightness in such a position deviation is the that the is a maximum distance the gauge and the object
.. b
distance
the generating
Method
7.1.2
&/ +s
0,1
+ 0
line parallel to
plate,
Record line.
the
measurements
along
the
entire
generating
of generating
lines,
15
Is
15054:2001
lSO/TR
5460:1985
7.1
Principle
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by comparing
with a straight
element
(continued)
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 7.1.3
23
0,7
E& +2!&
Placethe object on a surface
plate. Take indicator transfer The gram. readings along the entire generating lines and plate and against a square them to a diagram. deviation is evaluated from the diastraightness @ the required number of generating lines. @ Measure
Method 7.1.4
Mb
---Em
///////////////
/4
two coaxial centres parallel to the
0
t
Clamp the object between surface Record lines Record readings Ma @ half the plate. the
measurements
along
the
two
generating
difference
between
the
two
indicator
that is :
Mb 2
deviation
ia evaluated
the required
number
of axial sections.
deviation
is considered
to be the maximum
16
7.1
Principle
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by comparing
with a straight
element
(continued)
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification method
Comments
I Method 7.1.5
plate. lines.
Record
half
the
difference
between
the
two
indicator
that is :
Ma
Mb
.
Carry out the measurement @ and@ deviation is evaluated from the diagrams. in the two specified directions.
The straightness
Method 7.1.6
This method iects. A straightness measis main-
/5
0,1
parallel to the surface. with a target which the deviations to from these. of generating lines. is moved along a diagram and
II
surface.
number
17
1985
7.1
Principle
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by comparing
with a straight
element
(concluded)
Comments
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Method
7.1.7 \f) ---This method jects. Errors & /=/f ./2. /fl L the in setting repetition steps. the by of is main-
/-EE1
genemtmg
consideration. @
the indicator
deviation
is evaluated
from a cumulative
number
of generating
lines.
7.2
Principle
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by measuring
angle deviations
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
7.2.1 This method @ < > jects. If the spirit level is not adjustable, shall be aligned. the object horizontally is main-
?3=
01
1.
also be used.
line and set it to zero. Move the spirit level in specified line step under @ deviation the is evaluated incremental value. number of generating lines. @ from a cumulative deviconsideration. steps along the generating the values at each
Record
straightness
Measure
18
7.2
Principle 2
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by measuring
angle deviations
(concluded)
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
7.2.2 Autocollimator r o +--+ ,-@ A This method is mainly used jects. Continuous ment may used when the result. An angle measuring movealso be recording for large ob-
+ #Eto
0,1
with the object with along feet the at a specified generating ~ line
autocollimator /, in specified
distance,
deviation
from a cumulative
number
of generating
lines.
7.3
Principle 3
Verifying
straightness
deviations
by finding
centres of consecutive
cross-sections
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification method
Comments
Method 7.3.1
Rotate the object around a fixed axis. Record half the difference one complete Measure revolution of the indicator in a polar diagram. readings @ during
the required
number
of axial sections.
@ to
deviation deviation
centres.
19
Is
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
8
8.1
Verification
Principle
of flatness
Verifying flatness deviations by comparing with a flat element
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Method 8.1.1
M
Verification method
Comments
The object is generally aligned by bringing three ated surface distance surface case, values entered diagram the widely points to the from plate. shall on and or separon the same the In this be the evalu-
measured
Align the object as a superimposed plate. Measure the distance between number
surface
on the surface
the object
ated
corrected
mathematically.
is the maximum
distances.
Method 8.1.2
The face
surbe
at least twice the object size. For convex the object adjusted face way Place the object stably on the surface Measure the distance between number plate. plate that surfaces, should to the the in such be sura devi-
ation is minimized.
is the maximum
distances.
8.1
Principle
Verifying
flatness deviations
by comparing
(cone/uded)
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method --> \
8.1.3 .-. Ra Lx& Alignment telescope The alignment Prism rotating corrected matically. & of the be mathe4 This faces. method is
@ Target
axis can
Place Xl
the
alignment
telescope
on the
object,
Align surface
the of
rotating
axis perpendicular
to the superimposed
the object, The flatness calculated deviation is the maximum surface. difference from the
superimposed
MethodEl,
,r,rog,
tical Place ~ @@Zl ,U the optical flat on the object and observe it in
only
for up
small to on
objects monochromaticl~~. The flatness counted, deviation is the number of interference lines
with
flatness
deviations
the size of the optical multiplied by ;.12 of the light used. flat should be adjusted to the object ($=03m) way that in such a the devi-
ation is minimized.
8.2
Principle
Verifying
flatness
deviations
by comparing
with a straight
element
in several
directions
Tolerance application zone and
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
example
Method 8.2.1
#traight
gauge
rhis measurement ;elf-controlling :ertain nany imes extent, points using gauge direction. used to
is a as are
~etermined
I
sevaral the in a
I Object
[ml
Place a straight gauge diagonally on one adjustable support n
to
surface
. ---, e
-L ~,
and one fixed support, from the object. Measure the distance
between
the
object
and
straight
gauge at specified positions along the diagonal value at the centre. along the other
(A-B) in rela-
diagonal
after correction
form a reference
all
other points are determined. The flatness deviation is evaluated from the diagram.
Method 8.2.2
(--@@
/=/,. ~./j
his
method
is main-
the by of
he
is
to zero on a surface
plate.
deviation
diagram.
22
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
8.3
Principle
Verifying
flatness
deviations
by
measuring
deviations
from
the
horizontal
in severa!
directions
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
example
--%29 +=K
Method 8.3.1 / \ \
This method
is main-
The ment
achieved support or
///74//////
either by means of an adjustable an level. The many measurements as are points twice. instrualso be adjustable spirit
c1
!
EEEEl
I
lace >bject.
an adjustable
in one
used.
in a cumulative
as previously
described,
but at
is evaluated
from
the
cumulative
the incremental
deviation
= I x indication
--e
/
)f the level.
klethod
8.3.2
!sa
d%Q
Instrument b (moving) Gauge a (fixed) -. & Tube water level gauge ~ A Depth micrometer ,. . ,,, .!
is main-
for horizononly.
al surfaces
Common zone
p +==+
0,8
;et gauge a to zero. hen move instrument b along any flat element and record
23
8.4
Principle
Verifying
flatness
deviations
by measuring
angle deviations
in several directions
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification method
Comments
Mathod 8.4.1
Autocollimator <-3 This measurement self-controlling certain many times. Continuous ment may
D 0,08
m
n
is a as are
to
extent, points
determined
several
movealso be recording
angle
laser device be used. Place a mirror with feet at a spacified of the object. surface. Measure diagonal Repeat diagonal the angle deviation direction the in specified positions along the Adjust the autocollimator distance, /, at a corner parallel to the object
(A-B) and record the values in a diagram. in the direction of the other
measurement
(C-D). form a reference using the deviation where plane from which an appropriate from incremental all feet the devi-
These two diagonala other points The are distance. cumulative ation = / x
determined,
flatness
is evaluated
diagram
24
9
9.1
Verification
Principle
of circularity
Verify ingcircularity deviations bymeasuring variation inradius from a fixed common
centre
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification method
Comments
Mathod9.1.l
Minimum
zonacentre Applicable external surfaces. Equipment for of from or with mearadius fixed rotating rotating recorder to be for both
and internal
:@
v
Measured section
% ////////////
computer,
Align the object with the measuring shall be coaxial. Record olution. Evaluate and/or Measure the @ the minimum by computers. the required number zone centre radial differences
equipment.
Their axes
during
one
complete
rev-
from
a polar diagram
of sections.
@ radial difference
The circularity
deviation
obtained
between
two concentric
Method 9.1.2 -
and internal
@-w 7ZZDL
4
Maasured section Align the object with the measuring ;hall be coaxial. ?ecord olution. Evaluate mdlor the @) the least square centre from a polar diagram radial differences during one complete revequipment. Their axes by computers. number of sections. @ obtained Measure the required The circularity wtween Ires coinciding deviation is the radial difference inscribed and circumscribing circles with their cenwith the centre of the mean circle.
recommended diagram puter evaluation. Equipment surement variation centra stylus table, or used. : or with for of from
mearadius fixed
computer,
9.1
Principle
Verifying
circularity
deviations
by measuring
variation
in radius from
a fixed common
centre
{concluded)
9.2
Principle 2
Verifying
zone
circularity
and
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
Comments
iymbol
Tolerance application
Verification
method
example
ulethod
9.2.1
Ua
& ;
~ ,, /
for
both
and internal
measu r-
20
-1-
measuring
equipment.
L in two coordinates
circular section. Measure ference the o evaluation may be carried out by calculation required number of points on the circum-
The circularity
from the least square centre. Measure the required number of sections. @
27
9.3
Principle 3 Verifying
circularity
deviations
by profile projection
28
9.4
Principie4
Verify ingcircularity
deviations
bytwo-or
three-point
measurement
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
9.4.l
Summit
(2>
(three-point
4+
carried
out to check
rors, The even lobed checked by two point measurement. The most commor
angles are :
P@
~Meas.red section Align the object with the measuring axis shall be perpendicular fixed axially. The indicator reading during @ at the required number of secone complete revolution is equipment, The object and
cr = 90 and 120 01 72 and 108 This method JSed for :ither to the measuring direction the ?quipment. Applicable wfaces. for both can b~ 01 or
rotation object
?xternal and internal used for the calculation. Repeat ions the measurements @ deviation should be evaluated from the inand the a-value
Method
9.4.2
Rider
[three-point
a < >
?
Ingles are :
+ ix)
r = 90 and 120 or 72 and 108 Align the object with the measuring axis shall be perpendicular fixed axially. The indicator reading during @ at the required number of secone complete revolution is Applicable wfaces. for both ?xternal and internal equipment. The object direction and This method ~sed for ?ither the :quipment. can be of or
to the measuring
rotation object
used for the calculation. Repeat tions. The the measurements @ circularity deviation
should
be evaluated
from
the and
thewvalue
of lobes.
29
9.4
Principle
Verifying
circularity
deviations
by two-
or three-point
measurement
(conchded)
Comments
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Method
9.4.3
(two-point Q
measurement)
//
. \
:~
@$
Align the object with the measuring axis shall be parallel position Measure olution. Repeat ions to the surface centre. difference as the turning the diameter 0 the measurements @ deviation
equipment.
The object
rev-
at the required
number
of sec-
is considered
obtained.
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
10
Verification
of cylindricity
10.1 Principle 1 Verifying cylindricity deviations by measuring variation in radius from a fixed common axis
Tolerance application zone and
Symbol
axampie
Verification
method
Comments
Method
10.1.1 This method consuming sophisticated ment. Equipment surement @ A common recorder diagrams computer, used. for meais timewithout equip-
t .:5.F*
,,. ~-G . -A+\ w / ,,
.@ 0,1
& b
Align the object with the measuring shall be coaxial. Record ution the @ radial difference during
equipment.
Their axes
one complete
revol-
Measure
without
resetting
from
polar diagrams
deviation
is evaluated
by computer
31
1985
Symbol
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
t
10.2.1
z J
~:-~
.+=,
, ,
is timewithout equip-
&2
$ w
?; , :-..
and
00,1 n
&
& Align the object with the coordinate Measure surface the required number measuring equipment.
of points
on the cylindrical
in three coordinates. deviation is evaluated from diagrams of the minimum and/or zone
IS
lSO/TR
cylindricity
deviations
in V- and
iymbol
and
example
Verification
method
Commer
Method
10.3.1 ~ _@_, The V-block longer ject. Applicable ,&~l& for than s t
asur faceso
1~*/
Place the object in a V- block. Measure revolution. the object at a radial section during one complete @ at the required @ from the inand number of sec-
deviations.
t .+~+ - , *
//P& --- --G n
,,
Repeat
the indicator.
readings,
the a-value
the number
of lobes.
,rm
.,
Method
10.3.2 Applicable < -+ nal surfaces This mines && lobed deviations. lobed on a surface the object @ at the required @ movenumber of secplate and against a square one quires method only tt cyli T deviati a thrt fo( o
at a radial section
during
measurement
revolution.
the indicator.
33
11
Verification
11.1 Principle 1 Verifying profile deviations of any line by comparing with an element of correct
profile
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 11.1.1
The indicator tip and tip shall identical
11[
Copy tip
the have
copy an
shape.
x
n
004
Profile template A n
////////////
Align the object correctly profile template. The indicator correct pared with
The extreme
meaaured
but corrected
to the theoretical
direction
Mathod 11.1.2
Profile tamplate or larger deviations, I profile template ]e separated :he object determined may from distance
!?9
Object lace the profile template direction. the object and the profile ;pecified nspect ;pecified light. is observed, f no light column lot deviate ]rofile template by more than 0,003 (numerical
by a pre-
ii
~t both ends and the esulting space gaug?d with ]auge. a step pin
template
against
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
11.1
Principle
Verifying
profile deviations
with an element
of correct
profile (conchded)
Tolerance application zone and Verification method Comments
;ymbol
example
Method
11.1.3 Profile template The accuracy improved two by templates can be using with
4 b
limit form.
_ (
,,m
t Place the profile template specified Compare direction. the profile of the object with the profile template. on the object and align it in the
n
Method 11.1.4
This limited method to is of features
imiti:eines
&
n 0,04 Project the profile onto a screen. x El Compare the projected profile with the limiting profile lines. within the two limiting
used.
3s
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 11.2.1
The stylus shape of the be
should
&_~[
$
Coordinate ing \ used. machine measurto be
n
x
n o,ob
77/////
H
face plate. Measure the two coordinates points along the profile. Record limiting the measured profiles. values
///// /
A \
at the required
number
of
and compare
them
with
the
12
Verification
12.1 Principle 1 Verifying profile deviations of any surface by comparing with an element of correct
form
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification method
Comments
Method 12.1.1
x
sphere
0 tJ
/ / / /
P ///////
// /////////
object with the copy system and the form
Align
the
template. The indicator records the deviations of the object. value of the insur-
is the maximum
n
Method 12.1.2
,.
~--,/
.-
\\
sphere
0 t
-t0
~ 47
0,02
easrinLa=d
Device the for the rotation of the object template to med. or be Position the object relative to the rotational profile template Measure ation minimum at a required distance number by axis. Align the from the object. The form devimaximum and the required readings. of positions. the is determined comparing
r==+:---?
dicable to of revolution
This
method
is apsurfaces only.
37
12.1 form
Principle
(concluded)
Verifying
profile
deviations
with an element
of correct
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 12.1.3
This method Iy applied surfaces /eines + limited to is usual and feature: 01 i:
to externa
Project the profile onto the screen of a profile projector light-cut. Take the projected itions and compare profiles at the required them with the limiting number
with
of pos-
profile lines.
---,./ sphere 0 t % \
n m
Method 12.1.4
& Limiting profile lines This faces. method is limited to convex sur+
&
~...a
Project
the
required
number
of profiles
onto
the
screan
al
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
12.2.1 VT .?
X-Y axes ~, .d + +
ti/
The form and the size of the be count. Coordinate ing machine used. , measurto
stylus
should ac-
taken
into
sphere
0 t
be
n ///////////////////////7 n 0,02 Align the object with the measuring & Measure 1. o three coordinates surface
plate.
on the surface. Record the measured values and compare profiles. them with the
coordinates
39
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
13
Verification
of parallelism
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Mathod
Cyli
13.1.1
The cylindrical drels to fit may in expanded without man-
+l@Simulate the datum axis and feature axis with axes of inscribed cylinders extended outside the holes. direcMake arrangements tion (adjustable to achieve the correct measuring support). positions under control. from the formula Keep the axial measuring The parallelism deviation, x
clearance. mandrel in
If the upper
measured
Pd, is calculated L,
\kfl - q
Pd =
Lz
//
Mathod 13.1.2
rhe cylindrical be the maneither holes
~rels may
Cykwo%$k
the
;hould :he
be such
measured
Nion from parallelism Simulate the datum axis and feature axis with axes of in]ecomes a minimum. scribed cylinders Position drawing. Carry out the measurements . on the mandrel in posextended outside the holes. the measurement indicated on the
the object
may be carried
itions @
and @
The parallelism
deviation,
Pd, is calculated
Pd =
I&fl-
A4zl L, x
Lz
13.1
Principle
Verifying
parallelism
deviations
by measuring
distance
(continued)
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
Cyli
13.1.3
The drels to fit cylindrical may in be the maneither holes
expanded without
or selected clearance,
If the upper mandrel can be orientated tion, should the Simulate the datum axis and feature axis with axes of inscribed cylinders extended outside the holes. Keep the axial measuring positions under control. positions, A41 the in more than one direcorientation devibe such that
measured
ation from parallelism becomes a minimum. can be to The of two direcsquare the two
Carry out the measurements and A42. Repeat the measurements positions between The parallelism
on the mandrel
root of the sum of the in the required number of angular 0 and 180. At, is calculated L1 from the formula obtained tolerance
deviation,
[Ml - M*[ x
Pd = L2
//
Method 13.1.4
Measurement restricted to The of can be two direcsquare the two
shall be less than the value. 7//////// I \ ///// axis parallel & // ? Precision chucking
/) 00,1 A-B
Position simulate
the datum
to the surface
dlbl
number of angular
0 and 180.
Record half the difference the same section. The parallelism recorded values. @
readings
in
deviation
is the maximum
deviation
of the
41
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
13.1
Principle
Verifying
parallelism
deviations
by measuring
distance
(continued)
Comments
Symbol
Verification
method
AVBV
The drels to
Qf12v
!-== -.
. / ///////////////,7 A AH
AH
! Lr
tated one
direction, that
0 !00 +3EzlZl A
H8
from becomes
simulate the datum axis and feature axis with the axes of inR!?!!!i
;cribed cylinders. ;arry out the measurements ions as illustrated in horizontal and vertical direc-
Pd, is calculated
L.l x ~(ABv Pd =
//
vhere M,v Ml A42V for datum Af2v for cylinder cylinder A = AAV A = AAH B = ABV B = ABH
Method 13.1.6
-----
--
@
Simulate the datum with the base plane covering ~atum surface. Simulate the feature axis with the median line of top and the entire
oottom generating
a
42
P ..
B
@l
3ecord half the difference ngs in a diagram, rhe maximum ~eviation. that is
read-
deviation
of these values
is the parallelism
(concluded)
43
13.2
Principle
Verifying
parallelism
deviations
by measuring
angles
Symbol
Tolerance application
zone
and
example
Verification
method
Comments
Method
13.2.1
Spirit level reading
LI t, /1 000
spiri~ sup bf
also
to/looo
7777
Simulate mandrels. Record spirit level indications The parallelism deviation, x l!,, the datum
7%77%77
axis with cylindrical
Pd, is calculated
1/1- /.l
//
Pd =
100CI
//.< \ S
/ \
I I
Method 13.2.2
R*
~xu
L&i
plate.
Pd, is calculated
Pd
100
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
14
Verification
Symbol
Verification
-)
m, m
[ fr2 -w
The
cylindrical
manto
drel may be either expanded or selected clearance. fit in the hole without
1,1
~1~
m-
cylinder
inscribed
Then align the object in the correct to the measuring Measure equipment.
at
two heights,
Pd,
is calculated
from
]&flPd =
Method 14.1.2
M*I x
L2
L,
If the deviation
from the
i
* +- +
J >
dl
Ml
MJ
of
be ignor-
d2
measurements
in more than two secI ///////// Y///////////// I /// tions are necessary. When hole, drel to and the tolerance it is simulated manbe hole which fit in which may the
feature is the axis of a Place the object on a surface plate. by a cylindrical expanded without in this direction G is
Measure the dislance (All and A42) between the cylinder which simulates the tolerance feature and the square at twoheighta, diameters L2apart. Measure thedifference between the
d,
and
dz.
deviation
Perpendicularity
outside the hole. dG=[(M1-M+f*lx2 Repeat direction The the measurements Gandcompute in direction H perpendicular to the measurements. deviation, If the tolerance is indi-
requirement only,
PdG
perpendicularity is
Pd,
of
the
tolerance
is the perdevimethod
feature
Pd = ~(PdJ2
+ (Pd.)z
45
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
14.1
Principle
Verifying
perpendicularity
deviations
by measuring
distance
(continued)
Comments
;ymbol
verification
method
@ Ilb$
~Rotating table table and centre it at an exaxia. @ relative to the rotational number deviation of sections. is half @ the full indicator
the
Iowe
Measure the radial variation during rotation of the table. Vleasure the required The perpendicularity
[-t
novement.
J-
Method 14.1.4
gf !T++t@u1
, ,
I
Ml
n
,/ /
l-!
//////////
Uz
I ///+//////// /
to and
fit
in
without which
Measure the distance (A41 and A42) between the square at two heighta, L.2 apart. Measure the difference between is diameters
d, and d2.
The perpendicularity
deviation
,.=[(M1-M2+5)]X2
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
14.1
Principle
Verifying
perpendicularity
deviations
by measuring
distance
(continued)
rmbol
verification
method
Comments
x
Guide feature
selected
m
40 @j
le datum leasure
le surface
he perpendicularity lent.
move-
J_
ulethod 14.1.6
4 surface to a datum plane
Clamp plate.
is on a surfacf
The tolerance surface shall be adjusted to the surface plat[ ~rior to measurement. The ment. perpendiculari~ deviation is the full indicator move
47
14.1
Principle
Verifying
perpendicularity
deviations
by measuring
distance
(corrch.ded)
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
14.1.7
1 I
This generally
method used
is for
Target
;@
large objects.
Telescope [ /
z!
A
10,14
Pentagonal prism
!$
Move the tsrget along the tolerance direction and record the valuea. deviation values. @
is calculated
mathematically
14.2
Principle
Verifying
perpendicularity
deviations
by measuring
angles
Symbol
I
I
Method 14.2.1
Verification method
Comments
The
cylindrical
manto
drel may be either exSquare level panded or selected clearance. fit in the hole without
% t40.06 A
1!1
. - -- -
~11 -ij L-
~:
Q
l L
Ill
axis with
an inscribed
cylinder
. --
4-
outside between
dicularity simulating
is measured
as a difference
of the inclinations
A,
and
AZ
of the
featurea against the perpendicular sides of a square. The perpendicularity deviation, Pd, is
Pd = (Al - AJ
L,
48
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
14.2
Principle 2
Verifying
perpendicularity
deviations
by measuring
angles
(concluded)
49
15 15.1
Verification
Principle
of angularity
1 -- Verifying angularity deviations by measuring distance
Symbo
Verification
method
Comments
Method
4L-
15.1.1
L,?
The
cylindrical
manto
)atum line
drel may be either expanded or selected fit in the hole without clearance.
.1 ,
fi
Considere( line
~Projected
considered line
I /h.
/&
+,
ml, l
Place
and
align
the
object
object
p+ Ad =
L
Af,l x
L2
Method
15.1.2
The cylindrical manto
drel may be either expanded or selected :Iearance. fit in the hole without
Place the object on an angle plate with the angle 10 (go 800). Turn fit a mandrel in the tolerance hole.
on the angle
ference Measure
M2 is an algebraic
the distance
of the mandrel
L2 apart.
deviation, ~zl x L,
Ad,
is
Ad =
L2
15.I
Principle
Verifying
angularity
deviations
by measuring
distance
(concluded)
Comments
;ymbol
Verification
mathod
Method
15.1.3
x \ ////////////////
Simulate the datum axis with an inscribed cylinder surface plate and align it parallel to the horizontal face plate. Remove minimum. Measure the distance of the tolerance feature from an the object until the measured deviation is a and normal to the lower edge of the inclined sur-
rhe cylindrical
man-
Method
15.1.4
-&t
\ \\\\\\\\\\\\
Place the object on an angle plate with an angle of 40. Adjust the object by turning so that the full indicator ment of the tolerance The angularity deviation feature is a minimum. movement. move-
51
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
52
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
16
Verification of position
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
16.1.1
Ot -+ w
h
w
Align device. the object with the coordinates of the measuring Measure The the coordinates deviation, Xl and Y,. positional
m L-J
Pd,
is calculated
from
the two
coordinate
Pd =
~(100
The deviation
Method
16.1.2
fb
1,
I @)
-x
Align device.
the
object
with
the coordinates
of the
measuring
Measure
coordinates
Xl,
X2,
LEd
The position of the hole axis in the X direction using the formula
X2+ xl x=
2 and in the Y directionusing the formula
Y* + Y= Y,
2
deviation,
The positional
Pd, is
calculated
X and Y values
Pd=@11-X)2+(66-Y)2
The deviation shall not exceed half the tolerance value.
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
16.1
Principle
Verifying
position
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
or distances
(continued)
;ymbol
Verification
method
Comments
Ii
I
Ot I I I
The deviation
)epending
on
equip-
I IT. \_
-1 I___
Y, Yj
Coorclinate system of measuring equipment as given in method 16.1.2 for each hole. coordinates in
When there is more than one hole, repeat the measurements md calculation
value.
Method 16.1.4
-k
1+
w
54
Align the object with the coordinates of the measuring device. Carry out the measurements Xl, . ., X3 aion9 the
lines. The positional the maximum basic position The deviation deviation and is equal to the difference values line. half the tolerance value. respectively between and the
LEL!d.d
minimum
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
16.1
Principle
Verifying
position
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
or distances
(coIltilJued)
iymbol
Verification
method
Comments
tz
of
T
I ,
I I I
I L.
i
41ign the ~evice. lolee. Take the separately. The positional object
LL
1 IY2
---
Coordinate system of measuring equipment with the coordinates cylindrical of the mandrels measuring into the
be made to the edges of the hole. The best fitting tained matical by pos-
Place
expandable
coordinates
Xl,
X2,
Y1 and
Y2 for each
hole
deviation,
Pd,
in the X direction
is calculated
X2+ xl
Pdx=~and in the Y direction Y2 + Y,
Xtheoretical
using the formula
Pdy=y
Ytheoretical
I
coordinates in value.
Move the object in relation to the measuring order to find the best fit. The deviation shall not excceed
Symbol
Verification mathod
Comments
Method 16.1.6
I El
4+
The measuring equipment includes an enclosing guide ele-
angle.
Set the indicator to zero relative to the master objeat. Turn the workpiece to be measuted in such a way that the measured deviation on the surface ia a minimum. Carryout measurements at the required number ofpoints all over the surface.
The position dicator deviation is the maximum deviation of the in-
relative to the zeroed value. shall not exceed half the tolerance value.
The deviation
IS
lSO/TR
16.2 Principle 2 Verifying position deviations by using the maximum material principle
Tolerance zone and application example
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 16.2.1
u
,1
~TF
F:
Iw
accepts by the
the two
surfaces
exact dimensions.
Is
lSO/TR
17
Verification
of concentricity
17.1 Principle 1 Verifying concentricity deviations by measuring variation in radius from a fixed
common centre
58
17.2
Principle
Verifying
concentricity
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
or distances Comments
Imbol
Verification
method
+ v
@t
pplicable 11 and
entre-coordinates ,Iign the circular feature under consideration with the re mean values. oordinate measurwith device 19 alculator or measurlg microscope Y,) of the datum feature. the two with alculator to be used. ;alculate the positions of centres a (X1, eature and b (X2, he concentricity :entres calculated Concentricity rhe deviation Y2) of the tolerance deviation teasuring i required equipment. The plane in which the measurement
deviation
value.
Method 17.2.2
@t + v
rhis method
can
bl th(
-Qb a
can bl
micro
meter to be used.
u between
the
The deviation
17.3
Principle
Verifying
concentricity
deviations
by using maximum
material
principle
60
18
Verification of coexiality
18.1 Principle 1 Verifying coaxiality deviations by measuring variation in radius from a fixed common axis
Tolerence zone and application example
Symbol
Verification method
Comments
Method 18.1.1 Q I
I I I
Ot
A
w Q
external surfaces.
and
internal
IF
from a fixed
andlor to be used.
@ 00.07
computer
%
@ Align the object with the measuring & axis of the datum axis. @ cylinder
equipment with
is coincident
Determine ance
the axis of the feature by recording number of sections ~ from coaxialiv taking ia calculated
of the recordings,
into account
the position
in the axial direction. shall not exceed half the tolerance value.
The deviation
61
1985
18.2
Principle
Verifying
coaxiality
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
or distances
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
18.2.1
X-Y
&
I
I I I Ot @4 the datum cylinder
axes
for and
both
++
internal
v / //
equipment.
The axis of
to the X- and
Y-axes
of the measuring
In every section of the feature, of the diameters results together these points, axiality circumscribing The deviation deviation
the contact
points
along the X-axis and Y-axis and record the with the level of the section. are constructed, from the is determined element. half the tolerance value By means of and the coaxis of the
Symbol
I
I
Method 18.3.1
Verification
mathod
Comments
I
I
? I @t
gauge.
L{_,j@@~ I
Indicate
the datum
and feature
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
19
19.1
Verification
Principle
of symmetry
Verifying symmetry deviations by measuring coordinates or distances
Verification
method
Comments
Datum locators /\
rhe jrel
mandatum be or
ocators ?ither
selected to fit in the lole (or in the grooves) >Iearance. If the in such the Simulate the datum $cribed locators. plane with the median plane of two inplaced be Determine the position and the size of the locators and addatum plane parallel to the surface cylinder. in distance beplate. hole deviates form that be without
can
where
in the ac-
opposite
the feature
deviation
urements
outside the feature, the actual deviatior shall not exceed half the tolerance value. shall be calculated the relevant the feature. This ternal surfaces. method to and is ap both ex interna fol length o{
The deviation
plicable
19.1
Principle 1 Verifying
symmetry
deviations
by maasuring coordinates
or distances (continued)
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
19.1.2
This ternal surfaces. The the adjustment datums o COUIC b\ calcul method to and is ap both ex interna
plicable
also be performed Align the object in the following Determine calculate way : ~ ~ and mathematical ation. Coordinate
measur to bc
in distance feature
beaxis
the common
The deviation
value.
ternal
either the
panded or selected without As ments Place the object on a surface Place a flat surface Simulate feature plata. surface. feature with a actual on the opposite relevant the median plane of the tolerance locator. deviation is half the difference in distance faature. the clearance.
groovf
////
/ ///////
for the
length of the
The symmetry ~ ~
between
thefeaturelocator respectively.
andthesurfacepbte
value,
64
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
19.1
Principle
Verifying
symmetry
deviations
by measuring
coordinates
or distances
(conckfded)
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
19.1.4
,,,~,,~,
g:,,:,,e:
The deviation
Method 1+
W @
Measure A ~0,1 A
the distances from the feature surface to points on surface. deviation is half the difference between the
the datum
The deviation a
65
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
Symbol
Verification
method
Comments
Method
19.2.1
~Functional gauge The two tabs shall bf expanded to fit ante.
,
itrt &
It
!;,
or selectee clear
1-,
1) i
without
The drel
man tht
. >
minimum
metry tolerance.
I
Check the object using a functional Simulate Check the datums the symmetry using two tabs. deviation
using
a cylinder
of
ap-
propriate
size.
Method
19.2.2
Functional gauge The have width the of the
1, t
&
size
slots minus the syml 1) metry tolerance. cylindrical selected shall be expanded cwt clearance. mandrel to fit with-
gauge.
Simulate
icjx-
Check
propriate
size.
66
IS
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
67
IS
15054:2001
5460:1985
lSO/TR
20 20.1
Verification
of circular run-out
Principle 1 Verifying circular run-out deviations by measuring distance variations from a fixed
rotation around the datum axis
point during
Verification
method
Comments
Method
29.1.1
Q <-->
Align
the
object
in
two
coaxial
circumscribing
guide
cylinders. \ Tolerance surface remer The radial run-out deviation is the full indicator revolution movement crossmeasured section. Repeat sections. ~ this procedure ~ at the required number of crossduring one comDlete at each Fix the object axially.
\
<. . \
Method 29.1.2
The measurement Mfected oined l-block the )f form the effects angle is
@
G--+
8 $+%
A
\ tit
HOI A-B
deviations
eatu res.
Simulate
the datum
v.bl~k~.
Fix the object axially. The rsdial run-out measured section. Repeat sections. during @ this procedure @ at the raquired number of crosadeviation is the full indicetor revolution movement cross-
one complete
at each
20.1 point
Princigle during
Verifying around
deviations
by measuring
distance variations
from a fixed
rotation
axis (continued)
;ymbol
Verification
method
Commants
vlethod
[Tolerance \ WfaCe ~PlaneOfmeaaurement
20.1.3
@
<3
he measurement ffected
/-edge
is
by the comangle
.T7%7-
deviations
he datum features.
f MT
0,1 A-E
a a [A B
,,/ L
simulate
the
datum
axis with
two
identical
knife
edge
~-blocks. ix the object axially. rhe radial run-out measured $ection Repeat $ections during @ this procedure @ at the required number of crossdeviation is the full indicator revolution movement
one complete
at each cross-
Method 20.1.4
Tolerance surface remen
@ +-+
\ <. \
&
run-out for the
measuring
thecenregard features.
6
A
#
.1 A-B
B
make datums
corrections
corresponding
of the
69
Is
15054:2001 5460:1985
lSO/TR
deviations
by measuring
distance variations
from a fixed
(concluded)
70
21
21.1 Principle 1 Verifying total run-out deviations by measuring distance variations from the basic geometry during rotation around the datum axis
71
In this adopted standard, reference appears to certain International Standards for which Indian Standards also exist. The corresponding Indian Standards which are to be substituted in their place are listed below along with their degree of equivalence for the editions indicated : International Standard ISO11O1 :1983 Corresponding Indian Standard IS 8000 (Part 1) : 1985 Geometrical tolerancing on technical drawings: Part 1 Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out and appropriate geometrical definitions (first revision) IS 8000 (Part 2): 1992 Technical drawings Geometrical tolerancing: Part 2 Maximum material principles (first revision) IS 10721:1983 Datum and datum systems for geometrical tolerancing on technical drawings 1984 Proportions and IS 11158 : dimensions of symbols for geometrical tolerancing used in technical drawings Degree of Equivalence Identical
ISO 2692:1988
do
ISO 5459:1981
do
ISO 7083:1983
do
The concerned Sectional Committee has reviewed the provisions of the following ISO Standards referred in this adopted standard and has decided that they are acceptable for use in conjunction with this standard: Infernafional Standard
ISO 4291:1985
Title
Methods for the assessment of departure from roundness Measurement of variations in radius Methods for the assessment of departure from roundness two-and three-point methods
ISO 4292:1985
Measurement
by
61S is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
61S has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these form without the prior permission in writing of 61S. This does of implementing the standard, of necessary details, such designations. Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to
Review of Indian Standards
publications may be reproduced in any not preclude the free use, in the course as symbols and sizes, type or grade the Director (Publications), 61S.
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue of BIS Catalogue and Standards: Monthly Additions. This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc : No. BP 24( 0156).
Amendments
Amend
No.
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS Headquarters : Telegrams : Manaksanstha (Common to all offices) Telephone 3237617 3233841 3378561 3379120 603843 602025
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 Telephones :3230131, 3233375,3239402 Regional Offices : Central : Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg NEW DELHI 110002 : 1/14 C.I.T. Scheme Vll M, V. 1. P. Road, Kankurgachi KOLKATA 700054 : SCO 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 160022
{ 3378499, 3378626, {
Eastern
Northern
Branches
: AH MEDABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI. HYDERABAD. JAIPUR. KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAGPUR. NALAGARH. PATNA. PUNE. RAJKOT. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Printed at Prabhat Offset press, New Delhi.2