Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database Market screening frameworks Appendix Philippines market documents
1
Key contacts:
Mark Pickens
CGAP
Note: This document is confidential and should only be used outside GSMA/CGAP with prior approval Users of the toolkit GSMA/CGAP users looking at particular markets Coffey International in assessing applicants for funding Local market participants may elements useful
Version history
For MMU purposes any market that has a GDP per capita of less than USD 15,000 Analysis; anyone who does not have formal access to financial services as per
World Bank composite measure in Finance for all (see next slide for detailed definitions) Research; anyone who does not have an account of any kind (deposit, cheque, savings, salary, credit, postbank etc)*
Users of Mobile Money who had no other access to financial services (i.e. no bank
account of any kind) prior to becoming Mobile Money users
Mobile Money users who have no other formal access to financial services (i.e. no
bank account of any kind)
Unbankedmobiled
Sub $2/day
People who have no formal access to financial services (i.e. no bank account of any
kind) but who do have access to a mobile phone
Income segment of people who earn less than USD2/day per person (not ppp
adjusted)
3
* Users of remittance services that do not require an account are considered unbanked. Note: World bank definition may include this category Source:Team definitions
World Bank Finance For All extract Financial inclusion, or broad access to financial services, implies an absence of price and non-price barriers in the use of financial services; it is difficult to define and measure because access has many dimensions. Services need to be available when and where desired, and products need to be tailored to specific needs. Services need to be affordable, taking into account the indirect costs incurred by the user, such as having to travel a long distance to a bank branch (p.22) Financial inclusion, or broad access to financial services, is defined here as an absence of price or non-price barriers in the use of financial services. Of course this does not mean that all households and firms should be able to borrow unlimited amounts at prime lending rates or transmit funds across the world instantaneously for a fraction of 1 percent of the amount. Even if service providers are keenly competitive and employ the best financial technology, prices and interest rates charged and the size of loans and insurance coverage on offer in a market economy will necessarily depend on the creditworthiness of the customer (p.27) It is easier to measure the use of financial services since use can be observed, but use is not always the same as access. Access essentially refers to the supply of services, whereas use is determined by demand as well as supply (p.28)
Source: World Bank Finance for all
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database Market screening frameworks
Appendix
6
people can be provided with illustrate the potential for extending financial financial access by reducing cost to access to unbanked people serve through Mobile Money The approach can also be used as an alternative method to estimate the size of the mobile Money revenues and subscribers 7
1
Estimate potential mobile money users Steps
2
Derive MM ARPU
3
Estimate total market revenues
Market analysis to
estimate MM take-up rates based on similar markets Develop take-up scenarios based on likely market development Apply take-up rates to the addressable market, as well as to the unbanked share of the market Validate through market research if possible
Top-down: Market
analysis to estimate MM ARPU as % of total ARPU based on similar markets Bottom-up: Estimate actual usage per subscriber of key services at a given set of pricing assumptions Estimate the total ARPU per customer Validate through market research if possible subscriber
End Estimate of a range of products total mobile money subscribers over time
A1 MMU take-up rate ranges are derived based on existing cases and potential market development
Estimated take-up rates from case-data Average adoption rates, % Best in class** 35
ILLUSTRATIVE
Leaders Others
High end Aggressive scenario (to be developed locally) Adoption rates, % Market share,% Asia Leaders Others
8
26
Top segment
26
Weighted Average
7.8
7
52 48 50 50 54 46 31 69 49 51
Choose an
aggressive take-up scenario which is reasonable E.g., Average adoption rate across markets after weighting for leadership: 16.8%
Middle segment
Lower segment
7.8
7 2
Bank models
<1
Middle segment
Lower segment
Bank models
<1
* Not included in calculation for average MM adoption rates; adoption rate for bank-led models based on total mobile subscribers in country ** Actual value for best in class MNO, not an average Source: Press search; company websites; Gartner; Sida; CGAP; Merryll Lynch; McKinsey analysis; Interviews
A1 Adoption rates are applied to banked & unbanked mobile subscribers to estimate the overall market potential
Estimate the total Mobile Money subscriber potential by applying each adoption rate to total mobile subscribers per region Total Mobile subscribers 2012*, m Africa Adoption rates were applied to the total # of mobile subscribers Adoption rates % High end 16.8 Americas Asia Pacific Europe: Eastern Middle East 278 175 519 446 2,155 Mobile Money subscribers 2012*, m High end Low end
41 35
88 75
362 168
49 23 33 15
Estimate the total Unbanked Mobile Money subscriber potential by applying the adoptions rates to total unbanked mobile subscribers per region Unbanked Mobile subscribers 2012*, m Africa Americas Asia Pacific Europe: Eastern Middle East 143 94 332 260 872 25 12 18 8 Unbanked Mobile Money subscribers 2012*, m 56 26 44 20 147 68 High end Low end 135 290 Estd Global MMU subs, m
Low end
7.8
* Extrapolated based on CAGRs Source: Informa World Cellular Information Service, Wireless Intelligence
10
ILLUSTRATIVE
1.5
20 5 ~15 ~0.5 ~0.5 MMU ARPU, USD/month High end 1.0
* Ovum report shows distribution of transactions form 100-35,000 KSH, tightly bunched around 500-2500 with a long tail ** Safaricom website shows User-to-User 30 KSH, Money-to-Non-User 75-400 KSH, Withdraw-cash-from-User 25-170 KSH; average transaction of ~500 KSH so assume lowest of flat fees; assume 80% of usage is user-to-user Source: Ovum Report, Safaricom website, McKinsey Experts, Team Analysis
11
A3 The MMU subscribers and ARPU for each scenario drives a total market revenue estimate for a given market
High end estimate: Apply high-end ARPU to the aggressive take-up rate MMU subscribers Estd Global MMU subs, m High end 290 X MMU ARPU, USD/month High end 1.0
ILLUSTRATIVE
This allows us to estimate the total MMU market value Total MMU market size* USDb/year
(Take-up: 16.8%)
Low end estimate: Apply low-end ARPU to the baseline MMU subscribers Estd Global MMU subs, m High end 135 X MMU ARPU, USD/month High end 0.5
High end
3.5
Low end
0.8
(Take-up: 7.8%)
* NOTE: ARPU numbers are monthly, revenue numbers are annual Source: Team analysis
12
people can be provided with illustrate the potential for extending financial financial access by reducing cost to access to unbanked people serve through Mobile Money The approach can also be used as an alternative method to estimate the size of the mobile Money revenues and subscribers 13
B Mobile Operators will benefit from significant indirect benefits when deploying Mobile Money
Possible indirect benefits Churn reduction Rationale more sticky since they get more utility out of the SIM and have stored value on the SIM Churn of banking customers tends to be lower than Mobile Lack interpretability can help reduce churn, especially for market leaders (note to be discussed Range of impact (examples) 20% below non MM users
People who use MM services are likely to be MM churn rates can be more than
ARPU Increase
* Not sized since this lever may not be relevant to all markets Source:Interviews, company websites, Press clippings, Team analysis
B A high level sizing of the indirect benefits gives an indication of what MM is worth to an operator
Example indirect benefit sizing methodology 1 Value of reduced churn - example Reduced customer base churn revenue (of telco)* # Mobile Money users Current churn of telcos customer base (weighted avg) Forecast reduction of churn in MM adopting segment Value of churn reduction in # subs Current telcos customer base ARPU (weighted avg) ARPU * churn reduction = $ value 2 Increased ARPU - example Higher phone usage revenue Current telcos customer base ARPU (weighted avg) Marginal increase in phones usage (voice/data) Marginal ARPU # Mobile Money users $/month % $/month Nr subs Nr subs %/month % Nr subs $/month $
1
2 3 Indirect
ARPU New customers as % of total MM customers Incremental subscribers attracted through MM ARPU*incremental subscribers = total value
$/month % Nr of subs $
15
people can be provided with illustrate the potential for extending financial financial access by reducing cost to access to unbanked people serve through Mobile Money The approach can also be used as an alternative method to estimate the size of the mobile Money revenues and subscribers 16
1 Estimate the value of all retail financial service flows Top-down Approach
retail financial service flows rate for MM from these various service flows Estimate the unbanked proportion of these flows by Estimate fees per service accrued by different scaling up the cash/informal players in the ecosystem sectors to relevant products
Endproducts
17
C1 Top-down Approach: Estimate the total banked financial service revenue flows
ILLUSTRATIVE Existing flow Total economy FS flows (illustrative)
Definition
Possible sources
Non-cash Payments
Domestic Transfers
International Remittance
18
C1 Top-down Approach: Estimate the Unbanked financial service flows as a proportion of the total
Relevant to unbanked Unbanked share of GDP Existing flow Non-cash Payments Total economy FS flows (illustrative) Unbanked FS flow (top-down indicative) Relative Cash/Transfers % Assumptions
Domestic transfers
72%
International Remittance
2%
Deposits
Loans
Source: Team analysis, Interviews
C1 Mrkt research Approach: Build the Unbanked financial service flows through primary analysis of current usage
Relevant to unbanked Total economy FS flows (illustrative) Unbanked FS flow (top down indicative) Unbanked FS flow (mrkt research Country A), USDM/year MM services included from survey results
Existing flow
Cashless transactions in
Non-cash Payments
0
Cash
68
224
restaurants, groceries, supermarkets, malls Payment of bills Airtime purchase Transport access Receive salary/payment
Domestic transfers
Money sent Money received (dom.) Airtime sent/received Money received (int.)
International Remittance
161
Deposits
Storing value
Loans
Source: Team analysis, Interviews
20
Same potential as cash replacement (below) Based on average of reported fees for all
cash-replacing products
2-3
0.51.5
0.51.5
~0.5% as reported in market research ~1.5% based on MMT work (total is 4-6% of
which MNO capture ~1/3
~0.5% as reported in market research ~1.5% assumed potential interest spread TBD
Loans
n/a
21
ILLUSTRATIVE
MM take-up %
MM fee %
53,534
Cash
8,597 9,105
43,740
473 593
Deposits
5,317 5,413
Loans
4,042
22
Product Buy airtime Cash Cashless POS & remote payments Receive salary Send money Domestic Transfer Receive money (dom) Send & receive airtime International Remittance Deposits Receive money (int) Store money
MM revenue, USDm/year 1 1 0 20 10 1
5
0
Source: Philippines Unbanked Consumer Insights Survey - Feb-Mar 2009, (n=400); Team analysis
23
people can be provided with illustrate the potential for extending financial financial access by reducing cost to access to unbanked people serve through Mobile Money The approach can also be used as an alternative method to estimate the size of the mobile Money revenues and subscribers 24
2
Apply "cost-toserve"
3
Estimate addressable group
4
Estimate the incremental access via MM
Build income
distribution curve to identify who can reasonably be served by current banking system (or use proxy curves provided)
Estimate the
incremental population theoretically servable through lower "cost-to-serve" mobile channel (use range of cost-t0-serve reduction scenarios)
Calibrate this
theoretical addressable group to include only those who own a mobile and then apply a take-up assumption to this target population
Calculate
incremental access to financial services through mobile money
Endproducts
Income
distribution curve for target region
Estimate of
theoretical access provided by Mobile Money
Estimate of the
total potential access provided by Mobile Money
Estimate of
expected incremental access provided by MM
25
D1 Affluence curves have been developed to establish the income distribution for a range of markets
Daily income/capita $
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
PRELIMINARY
Asia Pacific Africa (limited sample)* Americas Europe: Eastern Middle East
100
Population percent
* Income distribution data for Africa sample is based on Nigeria data only (South Africa excluded, all other countries not available) Source: Euromonitor, Team analysis
26
D1 Key data for select markets can help determine which market proxy is most relevant for a given market
Population 2012, Million people GDP per capita 2012, USD/person Mobile subscribers* 2012, % Financial Service access 2008, % Unbanked share of GDP 2008, %
Region
Africa
1,004
1,898
52%
23%
25%
Americas
597
6,889
75%
37%
22%
Asia
3,581
3,150
60%
41%
18%
Eastern Europe
357
13,517
78%
43%
21%
Middle East
247
7,730
71%
38%
27%
* Mobile subscribers is based on discounted count of total # SIMs per market. Number of SIMs discounted by Wireless Intelligence formula Source: WMM, Global Insight; Wireless Intelligence; World Bank; Finance For All; Team analysis
27
ILLUSTRATIVE
Financial service revenue and cost to serve $ 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04
B C
MC = MR
A Assume that Financial services account for X% of income (based on proxy market)
The share of income determines the Financial services revenue for a given income band B Assume that Financial services are offered to the point where Marginal Cost = Marginal Revenue
(ie the revenue curve = the cost curve at each point)
C A reduction in the cost to serve enables offering financial services to lower income bands (based on same income share of GDP). Hence more people are accessible
Source: Team analysis
28
D3 By estimating the local cost to serve reduction it is possible ILLUSTRATIVE to determine the theoretical access made possible by mobile money
Inputs
A Current FS access
(%) B Cost to serve reduction (%) Current cost to serve estimate ($) MM cost to serve ($) C New theoretical financial access (%) D Increase in Financial access
Daily income per capita, $ 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.09 Theoretical access 0.08 possible through reduced cost to serve 0.07 0.06 Traditional 0.05 cost-to-serve A 0.04 MM B 0.03 cost-to-serve C 0.02 D 0.01 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Population percent
Source: Team analysis
29
Calculation s 0 Choose an income curve 1 Estimate current access to financial services (eg 40%) 2 Use current access to plot line to show where current Cost to serve could lie 3 Estimate the cost to serve reduction opportunity (e.g., 50% reduction) 4 Estimate the number of additional people who can now access financial services (eg 62%) 5 Map the total mobile penetration (eg 52%) 6 Total theoretical access (62%) minus mobile penetration (52%) = MM potential access = 10%
ILLUSTRATIVE
0.012 0.011 0.010 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 Theoretical access possible through reduced cost to serve Traditional cost-to-serve
0.05
0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0
0 10 20 30
2
3 6 4 MM cost-to-serve
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 5
Population percent
30
Objectives& Definitions
Market analysis
Sizing the market (direct & indirect) Estimating product mix Estimating unbanked access Stress-testing the numbers
Macro tools
Business plan framework
Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database Market screening frameworks Appendix
31
Reality testing the numbers test the key numbers against other variables to see if they make sense
User input
Variables High end of range x% x% x% x% x% Low end of range x% x% x% x% x% Indicative ranges 5-8% 3-5% 10-15% 5-25% 10-15%
Share of total unbanked mobile segment Total MM take up rate as % of total subscribers Mobile Money ARPU as share of total ARPU
Revenues
Indirect
MM churn and ARPU vs non-MM users MM cost to serve per user (technical) MM marketing & agent costs as % of technical
costs
x%
x%
~20%
x%
x%
x%
x%
~$2-4 1x-4x
Cost
Source: Company reports, Literature search, Team analysis, World bank data
32
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database
ILLUSTRATIVE
What is the basic business idea, target customer segments, and value
Executive summary proposition? To what extent will this service reach the unbanked What does the organizational business look like and who will lead the business?
What is currently happening in the market? What are the key success factors for MM success? Who are current and future competitors? What is positioning compared with key competitors?
What services are offered at what prices? What take-up rates are expected for different services? What partnerships/cooperations are needed? Where does the value to the customer lie, especially to the unbanked? What evidence is there to suggest there is a consumer demand? How can advertising and promotions support the customer value?
What business model will be deployed, have partnerships been agreed? What type of technology will be deployed? How will the service be distributed, how will the agent network be built,
what is value proposition for the agents? What organization and resources are needed? What are the core business processes?
34
Source: McKinsey
ILLUSTRATIVE
Management team
Which people will manage the future business? How can the right people be attracted and retained? (Banking and mobile
experience is important)
What is the position of the regulator with regards to this opportunity? What risks are involved with the market entry and how can they be
controlled?
What are the expected financial results over the next five years? What are the costs of deploying MM? (technical, marketing, channel
costs etc)
Source:
McKinsey
35
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database Market screening frameworks Appendix
36
Consumer insight research will develop a better understanding of current and potential users and inform market sizing-estimates
Research Objectives
Provide insights regarding current and potential MM users for business planning Attitudes towards traditional banks Usage of alternative informal channels & services Adoption barriers/funnel Inform market sizing estimates Unbanked share of MM users, adoption rate, churn and reload effect Provide understanding of MM service-flows and latent demand
Research approach
Focus groups
Use a structured facilitator guide to manage flow of focus groups while assisting agency in targeting answers on specific areas of interest (see appendix) Can use a survey-lite of 30-40 close-ended questions for respondents to complete pre-group (see appendix) Launch pre-design of quantitative survey to assist with customer segmentation, language/local knowledge input and hypothesis/options development
Survey
Use targeted sampling to address specific segments, but assess incidence through random sampling to size population/opportunity Target ~200 respondents for each relevant customer segment to ensure a 6-7% margin of error on each answer (n=100 is ~10%) Pre-draft core analysis/insights to help with planning option set per question and ensure each questions relevance/impact Ensure flow of question leads with easy/non-intrusive questions (e.g. daily mobile usage) pry into personal financial questions once respondent is warm
37
Develop hypothesis
Launch fieldwork
Analyse data
Debrief with TNS team & McKinsey Manila team in attendance Attain observations of group experiences Bolster understanding of linguistic, emotive nuances related to FS and MM Develop storyline hypothesis using indicative findings from Focus Group moderator guide Close-ended 30-40 min survey group 2 x focus groups with Build well-phrased Define target segments questions with context unbanked MM users MM users, no other of language and and non-MM users formal banking emotive reactions Moderator notes to access, urban/rural focus 2 hours on Non-MM users, no Telco usage formal banking FS usage access, mobile Mobile money <$2/day, mobile usage & perception Ensure key q.s are directly comparable w. existing surveys if * Dialects for fieldwork: Tagalog, Ilocano, Ilonggo, Cebuano, and Bicolano relevant
Target ~1000 responses Consumer with proportionate urbaninsights to help to-rural representation: inform the go to MM users = 400 market strategy Non-MM users = 400 <$2 day = ~200 Process involves door-todoor screening followed by 30-40 minute interview ~30 interviewers (4 teams) trained to use prompt cards, record answers & drive flow of conversation 38
The research should be designed to test a specific set of hypothesis about the market
Segment sizing
Latent Demand
Examples of MMU Consumer narrative The Unbanked mobiled are a significant group: As many as X % of lowincome groups are unbanked but do own a mobile phone. The sub$2/day makes up approximately X% of this group Unbanked consumers have a strong underlying demand for financial services, but most currently rely on informal alternatives
Sect C
Sect E
Many unbanked consumers do not fully understand the MM service People need to have access to the agent network if they are going to
sign up for the service, agents are much more ubiquitous than banks, but they are still far from the levels of air-time vendors
Sect E
Access
People are often reluctant to try MM because they find it difficult or they
dont see the services as something for people like me Trial
Sect C,D,E,F
Those who do use MM start with simple services at first but do have
Usage needs for more advances services if they can be made relevant to them
Sect D
People who have good experience with MM tend to become loyal users,
but the slightest service disruption can lead to abandonment of the service. Loyalty Implications for accelerating MM to the unbanked
Sect D,E
39
Focus group facilitators guide Description Facilitators guide for focus groups with unbanked MM users and nonMM users Moderator notes to focus 2 hours on Telco usage FS usage Mobile money usage & perception
Consumer adoption survey Description Defines target segments MM users, no other formal banking access, urban/rural Non-MM users, no formal banking access, mobile <$2/day, mobile Standard questions to ensure consistency
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database Market screening frameworks Appendix
41
Source:
42
Macro tools
Business plan framework Conducting Primary Market Research Best practice research guide Surveys and facilitator guides MMU database
Markets with high mobile penetration relative to financial access penetration may by ripe for Mobile Money
Mobile penetration* %
130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ukraine Argentina
Colombia
Malaysia
Mobile
United States Thailand
Mexico
Brazil
Peru
Philippines Indonesia Pakistan Vietnam India China Turkey
Access to financial services % * Mobile penetration can include double counting due to multiple SIM-cards, this is not adjusted Source: Wireless Intelligence, World Bank, WMM
44
Mobile / banking penetration and size appear to be important criteria in PRELIMINARY determining readiness for Mobile Money
Mobile vs. Banking Reach*
6.0
Tanzania***
5.5
A
A
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Major Potential Large unbanked populations High mobile vs. banking reach
Quick Risers High to very high mobile vs.. banking reach Giants Relatively low mobile vs.. banking reach Very large unbanked population in absolute terms Unclear potential Low mobile & banking penetration
Philippines Mexico Morocco Vietnam South Colombia Sudan Africa Uganda Turkey Thailand Poland Nepal Ethiopia
Brazil
Indonesia
Bangladesh India China
Myanmar
* ** *** Source:
Mobile Penetration (net of multi-sim proxy) vs.. % banked, average ratio of mobile penetration to banked share across markets shown is ~2 Average of unbanked population across markets shown is ~90 mn Tanzania potential does not seem to be observed in the market. Wireless Intelligence, World Bank, WMM, Global Insight
45
Nicaragua
Armenia
Tanzania
Kenya
Question marks: Sudan Thailand Colombia South Africa Uganda Iraq Algeria Morocco Uzbekistan Nepal Peru Poland Malaysia Guatemala Pakistan
Niger Senegal Zimbabwe Sri Lanka Rwanda Bolivia Chile Cuba Tunisia Honduras Sierra Leone El Salvador Paraguay Jordan Bulgaria
Nigeria
Mexico
Algeria
Vietnam
C
South Africa Myanmar 0 Ethiopia
Brazil Bangladesh
* Mobile Penetration (net of multi-sim proxy) vs. % banked, average ratio of mobile penetration to banked share across markets shown is ~2 ** Average of unbanked population across markets shown is ~30 mn Source: Wireless Intelligence, World Bank, WMM, Global Insight
46
Pakistan, Nigeria
14
47
308
43
37
39
22
Giants 5 countries China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Bangladesh Unclear potential 85 countries (see page 2)
41
46
3,105
45
42
55
43
32
48
987
48
45
57
35
* Initial team estimates Source:World Bank, Wireless Intelligence, WMM, Global Insight, CIA World Fact Book
47
PRELIMINARY
GDP/capita $
12,258 4,199 13,943 7,914 4,355 5,828 4,843 9,933 4,351 7,958 1,787 2,656 9,605 934 5,340 2,192 2,058 4,022 953 868 3,166 1,689 475 427 1,050 1,463 437 179 340 187 423
ARPU, USD
12 7 19 12 7 17 8 14 10 15 5 11 17
17,210 7,790 5,410 8,720 n/a 11,350 5,470 7,560 2,690 n/a 17,010 1,070 n/a 2,200 n/a n/a 2,280 n/a 4,350 n/a n/a n/a 3,590 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a
40
5 10 14 3 10 13 3 7
n/a
17 12 10 42 15 32 5 48 15 20 n/a 20 14 19
48
PRELIMINARY
Rational Will the private sector fill the gap (if there is one)?
How competitive are the banking and telco industries? Are there environmental factors which may indicate
people need safe savings options?
How many unbanked people are there? What is share of young vs old people? Does size of
family indicate the need for saving?
PRELIMINARY
Are there large domestic migration flows? What is ATM penetration? Does regulatory environment allow Mobile
Money?
Regulatory environment
Alternative channels
50