Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 6
Acknowledgements
WhatareServiceDeliveryStandards
WhatisthepurposeofServiceDeliveryStandards? WhoaretheServiceDeliveryStandardsfor?
HowwilltheServiceDeliveryStandardsbemonitoredandreviewed?
ServiceDeliveryStandardsOverview Standard1:ServiceCulture
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Standard2:ProfessionalBehaviour Standard3:Communication
Standard8:Assessment Standard9:Intervention
Standard10:ResourceAllocation Standard11:CapacityBuilding
Standard12:RecordManagement
Appendix1:KeySupportingDocumentsforStandard9 Appendix2:KeySupportingDocumentsforStandard10
20 21
The Service Delivery Standards for Support Services mark an important milestone in our joint commitment to strengthen service improvement and accountability for all Support Services staff workinginregions. At the beginning of 2009, Support Services were restructured into multidisciplinary teams with servicesacrosseightspecialistareascomingtogetherintheoneteamundertheleadershipofone manager. The value of this integrated team approach is well documented and supported. These Standardshavebeendevelopedtoreflecttheworkofanintegratedteamofdiverseservicesrather thananysingleanddistinctservice. The Service Delivery Standards support a strong service ethos, with Support Services staff building their relationships and partnerships with preschools and schools through clear expectations and accountability. TheStandardswereapprovedbytheCentralCoordinationCommitteeinFebruary2011,followinga comprehensiveconsultationprocesswitharangeofstakeholders. IthanktheWorkingGroupandallthepeoplewhohavecontributedtothisvaluablework. TrevorRadloff DIRECTORSITEANDREGIONALIMPROVEMENTANDACCOUNTABILITY
The Service Delivery Standards were developed by the Quality Improvement and Accountability (SupportServices)Groupcomprisingthefollowingmembers: Convenor SophieTakmaki(ManagerRegionalProfessionalSupport) BarbaraLennon(ManagerRegionalSupportServices) ShayneDavis(ManagerRegionalSupportServices) CatherineNikkerud(ManagerQualityImprovementandEffectiveness) ChrisLawrence(PerformanceAnalysisandReportingConsultant) GrahamWood(PrincipalElizabethNorthPrimarySchool) BrentonRobins(PrincipalVictorHarborPrimarySchool) LynRowe(PreschoolDirectorHappyValleyKindergarten) DeanAngus(PrincipalMoontaAreaSchool) RobShepherd(PrincipalLeFevreHighSchool)
SupportServices
QualityImprovement
Preschools/Schools
Thank you also to the wide range of people who provided feedback and input to drafts and discussions. These people included the Managers Regional Support Services, regional Support Services staff, Regional Directors, Assistant Regional Directors and regional staff, preschool and schoolsstaffandstateofficestaff.
Servicedeliverystandardsareasetofclearandpubliccriteriawithexplicitindicatorsthatdefinethe servicedeliveryperformancebywhichSupportServicescanbemonitoredandreviewed. ThestandardsdefinethequalityofservicethatSupportServicesstaffprovide,andassucharesetata level that can be achieved within the current resources and with clear, targeted and measurable improvementgoals.
TheoverallpurposeofServiceDeliveryStandardsistomaximisechildandstudentlearning.Support Services staff working in partnership with sites staff in the development and implementation of effectivestrategiestoimprovechildandstudentoutcomes.Thestandardsaimto: supporttheprovisionofconsistentlyhighqualityservicedelivery encouragecontinuousimprovementandidentifyspecificareasforimprovingservicequality assistserviceproviderstoselfauditthequalityoftheirservice fosteracollectivecommitmenttoqualitythroughacommonsetofclearandmeasurable criteria assistsitesinknowingwhattoexpectfromserviceprovidersinrelationtothequalityof servicedelivery maximisesitestaffsatisfactionandconfidencewiththeservice meetreportingandaccountabilityrequirements assistwithmonitoringandevaluationprocesses
TheQualityImprovementandAccountabilityforSupportServicesGroup(QIASS)wasestablishedin August2009todevelopservicedeliverystandardsinSupportServices.Thegroupdevelopedadraft oftheservicedeliverystandardsusingthefollowingrangeofsourcesandprocesses: considerationofpreviousservicedeliverystandards considerationoftheDECSImprovementandAccountabilityFramework(DIAf) researchintootherservicedeliverystandardsandserviceefficacy initialconsultationwithManagersRegionalSupportServices analysisofRegionalEffectivenessSurveydata considerationofrolesandresponsibilitiesofSupportServicesstaff Consultation on the draft standards was undertaken over two terms (Term 2 and 3, 2010). The followingkeystakeholdergroupswereinvitedtoprovidefeedbackonthedraft: ManagersRegionalSupportServices regionalSupportServicesstaff corporateleadership(RegionalDirectors,AssistantRegionalDirectors,SchoolandRegional Operationsseniorstaff,CentralProfessionalSupportOfficers) regionalstaff(othermembersofregionalteams) preschoolsandschools ThegroupconsideredallfeedbackduringTerm4,2010andredraftedtheServiceDeliveryStandards. Further work was also incorporated in the document; monitoring and review processes and key supportingdocuments.Workonthesesectionsisnotfinalisedandwillcontinuein2011.
The 12 Standards range from very broad areas (eg service culture) to very specific services and processes (eg referral). They cover both public services (ie those directly experienced by sites eg assessment) as well as internal processes(ie those thatindirectly may impact sites but that are not directlyobservableoutsideoftheregionalteam,egrecordmanagement). Inthisdocument,pleasenotethefollowinguseofparticularwords: staffreferstoregionalSupportServicesstaff studentreferstochildrenandstudents sitereferstopreschoolandschoolstaff parentisinclusiveofcaregiverandguardian
Eachstandardissetoutasfollows: Broadstandardtopic(egServiceCulture) ServiceDeliveryStandardonekeysentencedescribingthestandard Definitioninitalics,adescriptionofthebroadtopicinthecontextofthisstandard Whatdoesitlooklike?asetofspecificqualitydescriptors Howwillitbemonitoredandreviewed?theprocess/processesandtoolsformonitoringand reviewingthestandard KeySupportingDocumentsrelevantdocumentsthatshouldbeusedinconjunctionwiththe standard,providingcontextualinformationand/oroperationaldetail. Three of the key overarching documents for these standards are the Codes of Ethics for the South Australian Public Sector (2010), the DECS Improvement and Accountability Framework and the DECS StrategicDirections(currently2011).TheServiceDeliveryStandardsneedtobeviewedwithreference tothesedocuments. Regional Support Services staff and their managers can access the majority of the Key Supporting Documents from the Support Services website (www.decs.sa.gov.au/supportservices) . Please note thatthiswebsiteispasswordprotectedandcanonlybeaccessedbyregionalSupportServicesstaff andtheirmanagers.Forallotherstaff,awiderangeofthesedocumentscanhoweverbeaccessed from the DECS public and intranet websites (www.decs.sa.gov.au and http://in.decs.sa.gov.au ). If youarenotabletolocateaparticulardocument,theregionalManagercanbecontactedtoassist.
The phased implementation process will commence in Term 1, 2011. The phases will involve the following: Phase1CommunicationandFamiliarisation Phase2Localplanningandbaselineinformationcollection Phase3Localimprovementgoalsetting Phase4Localmonitor,reviewandreportingprocesses DuringPhase1,RegionalDirectors,AssistantRegionalDirectorsandManagersSupportServiceswill workwithregionalSupportServicesstaffandotherregionalstafftodiscussthestandardsandfoster understanding and engagement. Managers Regional Support Services will lead more focused discussions with their teams regarding common understandings and local implications. Work will occuratstatewideservicegroupdaysandwithCentralProfessionalSupportOfficers. Eachregionwilldeterminehowthestandardswillbecommunicatedanddiscussedwithpreschooland school staff. As a high level of understanding and engagement from sites is critical, it is highly recommendedthatregionsincorporatearangeofforumswithintheircommunicationstrategywith sites. Regions can contact Sophie Takmaki (Manager Regional Professional Support) to negotiate any supportandassistancetheymayrequireduringPhase1.
TheServiceDeliveryStandardscomplementtheDECSImprovementandAccountabilityFramework (DIAf) by providing a set of specific standards for regional Support Services. The principles of improvement and effectiveness, including self review, improvement planning, intervention and supportandperformancereportingareallimportantelementsoftheprocess.Workwillcontinue in 2011 to develop the specific processes, tools and reporting frameworks to assist regions in monitoringandreviewingtheworkofregionalSupportServicesagainstthesestandards. As with all improvement endeavours, each region will need to begin by gathering baseline informationforeachofthestandards.Thisinformationwillthenformthebasisforsettinglocal improvement goals. Regions will determine which standard/s they would like to target and also determinethedegreeofimprovement(eg5%)theyareaimingfor.
Apositiveservicecultureunderpinsallserviceprovision
Theserviceculturereferstothekeymessagesexpressedthroughtheattitudes,behavioursandprofessionalqualities ofsupportservicesstaff.Thisstandardcomplementstheguidingvaluesandprinciplesofbehaviourandprofessional conductstandardsassetoutintheCodeofEthicsforSAPublicSectorEmployee
RegionalEffectivenessSurvey DIAfCorporateSelfReviewSnapshotToolAttendtoCulture,FocusonCoreBusiness
Staffdisplayahighlevelofprofessionalbehavioursand attitudesinallaspectsoftheirserviceprovision
A set of behaviours and attitudes that are exhibited by support services staff in their work and interactions with others. This standard complements the guiding values and principles of behaviour and professional conduct standardsassetoutintheCodeofEthicsforSAPublicSectorEmployee
Communicationprocessesareefficientandeffective
Communicationreferstotheprocessofconveyinginformationthroughwritten,verbalandnonverbal(behavioural) processes
Systemicreviewandevaluationprocessesinformservice improvementsandfutureplanning
Service review and evaluationrefers to the assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of processes, programs, and outcomes with a view to improvement of service. This standard complements the DECS Improvement and Accountabilityframework(DIAf)andneedstobeimplementedwithinthisoverallframework.
DECSImprovementandAccountabilityFramework(DIAf) StandardsforImprovementandAccountabilityDiscussionPaper(2009)
Prereferralprocessesfacilitatetimelysupporttositesto supportstudents
The prereferral process involves the discussion and consultation that occurs with the site to clarify concerns and determinethesupportresponsewhichmayormaynotresultinareferraltosupportservices
RegionalEffectivenessSurvey
Effectiveandefficientprocessesareusedtomanage requestsforservice
Thereferralprocessisaformalmechanismbywhichsitesrequestsupportfollowingaprereferralprocess
RegionalEffectivenessSurvey AuditofSSDS
SupportServicesReferralProcess CaseworkStatusGuidelines
Qualityassessmentprocesseswhichprovidearangeofdata areusedtoinformservicedelivery
Assessment refers to the information gathering process to determine need/s and/or diagnosis. This process may involvearangeofpeopleincludingstudents,sitestaff,parentsandotherprofessionals.Itmayincludeobservation, testing,interview,screening,checklistsandviewingsamplesofwork.
assessmentcommenceswiththeprereferraldiscussionandwhereadditionalassessmentis required,timelinesarenegotiatedwithsite theassessmentprocessisunderpinnedbyastrengthsbasedperspectiveandtakesinto accountcontextualfactors staffusearangeofassessmentprocessesandconsiderthestudentholistically,takinginto accountallrelevantinformation theassessmentinformationisdocumentedandusedtoinformallaspectsofplanningand decisionmaking documentationisclear,easilyunderstoodandincludesrecommendationsforimproving learningoutcomes,monitoringandreviewprocesses,andtimelines formalwrittenreportsfollowthereportwritingguidelinesforthespecificservicegroupand areprovidedwithin4weeksofcompletingtheassessmentprocessorasotherwise negotiatedwiththesite
RegionalEffectivenessSurvey Auditofstudentfile(hardcopyandelectronic)
Resourceallocationprocessesareefficientandtargetedto improvestudentengagementandlearningoutcomes
Resourceallocationreferstotheactivitiesinvolvedintheallocationofadditionalresourcesand/orfundingtosupport studentsand/orthesite
DIAfCorporateSelfReviewSnapshotToolTargetResources QualityAssurance,MonitoringandReviewProcess(SVPS)
Responsiveandtargetedcapacitybuildingincreasessite confidenceandabilitytoeffectivelysupportstudents
ProvisionofTrainingandDevelopmentDataCollectionProcess(tobedeveloped) SupportingourteachersdiscussionPaper2
Auditofstudentfiles(hardcopyandelectronic)
RecordsManagementdocumentationandFactSheets SSDSMinimalRequirements ConfidentialityDiscussionPaper(tobedeveloped) UserAgreement(StudentFile) FreedomofInformationAct1991 InformationManagementPolicyPrivacyandConfidentiality InformationSharing:GuidelinesforPromotingtheSafetyandWellbeingofchildren,youngpeople andtheirfamilies InformationPrivacyPrinciples DECSInformationManagementPolicycustodianshipandOwnership DECSProcedureDestructionofRecords DECSDisposalSchedules
BEHAVIOURANDWELLBEING BehaviourManagementGuidelinesforStudentswithdisabilities ChildrensProtectionAct CybersafetyKeepingChildrensafeinaconnectedworld:Guidelinesforschoolsandpreschools Proceduresforsuspension,exclusionandexpulsion InterventionMattersapolicystatementandproceduralframeworkforthemanagementof suspecteddrugrelatedincidentsinschools LearnerWellbeingFrameworkBirthto12 Respondingtoproblemsexualbehaviourinchildrenandyoungpeople SchoolDisciplinePolicy Supportingandmanagingchildrensbehaviouranearlychildhoodresource
LevelofSupportDescriptorsforstudentswithdisabilities DisabilitySupplementaryFunding(DSF) ChallengingBehaviourFunding ResourceAllocationAdjustmentPanel(RAAP) PreschoolSupportProgram PreschoolAccessProfile HealthandPersonalCare CriteriaandEvidenceforIntensiveLevelofSupport GuidelinesforHighSustainedLevelofSupport(Hearing,VisionandDual) GuidelinesforVeryHighSustainedLevelofSupport