Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Date of Submission:
Agency: Department of Education
Bureau: Office of the Chief Financial
Officer
Name of this Capital Asset: Grants Administration Payment
System (GAPS)
Unique Project (Investment) 018-14-01-01-01-1030-00
Identifier: (For IT investment
only, see section 53. For all other,
use agency ID system.)
What kind of investment will this Operations and Maintenance
be in FY2008? (Please NOTE:
Investments moving to O&M ONLY
in FY2008, with
Planning/Acquisition activities
prior to FY2008 should not select
O&M. These investments should
indicate their current status.)
What was the first budget year FY2001 or earlier
this investment was submitted to
OMB?
Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment,
including a brief description of how this closes in part or in
whole an identified agency performance gap:
The Grant Administration and Payment System (GAPS) is a centralized
and integrated grant administration and payment system, eliminating
the need for duplicate data entry and providing easy access to funds for
grant and direct loan recipients. It is a custom-built Powerbuilder
application and supports planning, pre-award, award management and
post-award stages of the Department grant programs including
discretionary, formula, fellowship, and block grants. GAPS interfaces
with various program office feeder systems to support the planning,
scheduling and award processes of these programs and has the
capability to make payments for Federal Student Aid (FSA) programs
such as Pell and Campus based grants. In addition to processing
payments for these feeder systems, GAPS processes the payments for
all Department grant programs. Annually, GAPS supports the
processing of 16,000+ discretionary grant awards and formula and
block grants totaling $44 billion. The Grant Administration and Payment
System (GAPS) is a centralized and integrated grant administration and
payment system, eliminating the need for duplicate data entry and
providing easy access to funds for grant and direct loan recipients. It is
a custom-built Powerbuilder application and supports planning, pre-
award, award management and post-award stages of the Department
grant programs including discretionary, formula, fellowship, and block
grants. GAPS interfaces with various program office feeder systems to
support the planning, scheduling and award processes of these
programs and has the capability to make payments for Federal Student
Aid (FSA) programs such as Pell and Campus based grants. In addition
to processing payments for these feeder systems, GAPS processes the
payments for all Department grant programs.
Did the Agency's Yes
Executive/Investment Committee
approve this request?
a. If "yes," what was the date of
this approval?
Did the Project Manager review Yes
this Exhibit?
Has the agency developed and/or No
promoted cost effective, energy
efficient and environmentally
sustainable techniques or
practices for this project.
a. Will this investment include Yes
electronic assets (including
computers)?
b. Is this investment for new No
construction or major retrofit of a
Federal building or facility?
(answer applicable to non-IT
assets only)
1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC
being used to help fund this
investment?
2. If "yes," will this
investment meet sustainable
design principles?
3. If "yes," is it designed to be
30% more energy efficient than
relevant code?
Does this investment support one Yes
of the PMA initiatives?
If "yes," check all that apply: Financial Performance,
Expanded E-Government
a. Briefly describe how this We see significant alignment
asset directly supports the between GAPS and the PMA as
identified initiative(s)? follows: 1. Collaborative nature
of the project with other
agencies 2. Focus on citizen
needs 3. Alignment with the
Federal Enterprise Architecture
(Federal Financial Assistance,
Grants Assistance); 4. Use of
web-enabled/e-business
technologies.
Does this investment support a No
program assessed using the
Program Assessment Rating Tool
(PART)? (For more information
about the PART, visit
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
a. If "yes," does this investment No
address a weakness found during
the PART review?
b. If "yes," what is the name of
the PART program assessed by
OMB's Program Assessment
Rating Tool?
c. If "yes," what PART rating did
it receive?
Is this investment for information Yes
technology?
If the answer to Question: "Is this investment for information
technology?" was "Yes," complete this sub-section. If the
answer is "No," do not answer this sub-section.
For information technology investments only:
What is the level of the IT Level 3
Project? (per CIO Council PM
Guidance)
What project management (1) Project manager has been
qualifications does the Project validated as qualified for this
Manager have? (per CIO Council investment
PM Guidance):
18. Is this investment identified No
as "high risk" on the Q4 - FY 2006
agency high risk report (per
OMB's "high risk" memo)?
Is this a financial management Yes
system?
a. If "yes," does this investment Yes
address a FFMIA compliance area?
1. If "yes," which compliance Federal Financial Management
area: Systems Requirements (JFMIP
Functional Requirements)
2. If "no," what does it
address?
b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system
acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems
inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52
FMSS/Oracle
What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008 funding
request for the following? (This should total 100%)
Hardware 0
Software 0
Services 100.000000
Other
If this project produces Yes
information dissemination
products for the public, are these
products published to the Internet
in conformance with OMB
Memorandum 05-04 and included
in your agency inventory,
schedules and priorities?
Are the records produced by this Yes
investment appropriately
scheduled with the National
Archives and Records
Administration's approval?
Summary of Funding
Performance Information
Risk Management
c. If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any
plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:
The Department has not formally launched an Operational Analysis (OA) requirement.
Plans are to commence an Operational Analysis process in the fall of 2006.