Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), implementation or expansion of small, local level, LEAs may not request funds
announcement is made of the following safe, and successful learning for more than 10 schools under a single
committee meeting: environments in large public high application.
Name of Committee: Coastal schools. These grants are authorized by The chart below provides eligible
Engineering Research Board (CERB). Title V, part D, subpart 4 of the ranges for awards under a planning
Dates of Meeting: April 9, 2003. Elementary and Secondary Education grant:
Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel Act of 1965 (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7249), as
Atlanta Airport, College Park, Georgia. amended by Public Law 107–110, the Number of schools in Award ranges
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. LEA application
Time: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eligible Applicants: Local educational One school ................... $25,000–50,000
Inquiries and notice of intent to attend agencies (LEAs), including schools Two schools .................. $50,000–100,000
the meeting may be addressed to funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs Three schools ............... $75,000–150,000
Colonel John W. Morris III, Executive (BIA schools), applying on behalf of Four schools ................. $100,000–200,000
Secretary, Coastal Engineering Research large high schools are eligible. For Five schools .................. $125,000–250,000
purposes of this program, a large high Six schools ................... $150,000–250,000
Board, U.S. Army Engineer Research Seven schools .............. $175,000–250,000
and Development Center, 3909 Halls school is defined as a school that
includes grades 11 and 12 and enrolls Eight schools ................ $200,000–250,000
Ferry Road, Vicksburg, Mississippi Nine schools ................. $225,000–250,000
39180–6199. at least 1,000 students in grades 9 and Ten schools .................. $250,000
above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applications Available: March 20,
Proposed Agenda: An Executive In previous SLC competitions,
2003. applicants have routinely requested
Session of the CERB will be held April Deadline for Transmittal of
9, 2003. Topics to be discussed will more money than the above award
Applications: May 19, 2003.
include Section 227 Shoreline Erosion ranges dictate. As a result, plans
Deadline for Intergovernmental
and Control Demonstration Projects and submitted to the Department have
Review: July 18, 2003.
Contracting Process, Regional Sediment Estimated Available Funds: included any number of activities that
Management (RSM) Demonstration and $135,000,000. could only be made possible if an
RSM Research and Development, Field Types and Ranges of Awards: The applicant received a funding amount
Data Collection Programs and Secretary will award both planning and much higher than intended in the award
Performance of Shore Protection implementation grants under this range. Based on this experience, the
projects, the National Shoreline competition. In an effort to encourage Department will fund only those
Management Study, and Coastal systemic, district-level reform efforts, applications that correctly request funds
Louisiana. the Secretary is permitting an individual within the award ranges specified in
This meeting is open to the public, LEA to submit a maximum of one this notice for both planning and
but since seating capacity of the meeting planning grant application and one implementation grants. Applicants
room is limited, advance notice of intent implementation grant application under requesting funding amounts higher than
to attend, although not required, is this competition, specifying in each the award ranges dictated by the
requested in order to assure adequate application which high schools the LEA number of schools to be served will be
arrangements for those wishing to intends to fund. An LEA may not apply declared ineligible and will not receive
attend. for both a planning and implementation funding. Further, schools that received
grant on behalf of the same high school. support through planning grants in the
John W. Morris III, A high school may only be included in FY 2000 or FY 2001 competition are not
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Executive either the LEA’s planning grant eligible to receive support through
Secretary. application or its implementation grant additional planning grants under this
[FR Doc. 03–6700 Filed 3–19–03; 8:45 am] application. Applicants pursuing competition.
BILLING CODE 3710–61–M planning grant funds must not yet have For a three-year implementation
developed a viable plan for creating grant, LEAs may receive, on behalf of a
smaller learning communities in the single school, $250,000 to $500,000.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION schools that would be served through LEAs applying on behalf of a group of
the grant. To apply for implementation eligible schools may request up to
[CFDA No. 84.215L]
grant funds, applicants must be $2,500,000 per implementation grant.
prepared either to implement a new As with planning grants, districts must
Office of Vocational and Adult stay within the minimum and maximum
Education—Smaller Learning smaller learning community program
within each targeted high school, or to school allocations when determining
Communities Program their group award request, or the
expand an existing smaller learning
community program. Department will consider the
ACTION: Notice inviting applications for
For a one-year planning grant, LEAs application ineligible. In order to ensure
new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2002.
may receive, on behalf of a single sufficient implementation funds at the
Purpose of Program: On January 8, school, $25,000 to $50,000 per project. local level, LEAs may not request funds
2002, President George W. Bush signed LEAs applying on behalf of a group of for more than 10 schools under a single
into law the No Child Left Behind Act eligible schools may receive up to application.
of 2001, which reauthorized the Smaller $250,000 per planning grant. As this The chart below provides eligible
Learning Communities Program. The program is designed for redesign and ranges for awards under the
purpose of the Smaller Learning improvement efforts at the individual implementation grant:
Communities Program is to support school level, districts must stay within
Number of schools
academic achievement through the minimum and maximum school in LEA application Award ranges
awarding competitive grants to LEAs allocations when determining their
applying on behalf of large public high award request. In addition, in order to One school ............. $250,000–500,000
schools for the planning and ensure sufficient planning funds at the Two schools ............ 500,000–1,000,000
VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:11 Mar 19, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1
13690 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 2003 / Notices
VerDate Jan<31>2003 18:37 Mar 19, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1