Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
Some people think, wrongly, that Ockham’s Razor excludes discussions of God.
In fact, God cannot be excluded by Ockham’s Razor. Recall, that Ockham’s Razor is
defined as a principle which requires that a more simple explanation which makes the
explanation which is more complex and makes more extraneous assumptions. Now, if
we look at one of Thomas Aquainas’ proofs for God’s Existence it is clear that Ockham’s
Razor cannot exclude discussion of God. We start with the observation from sense
experience that there are all sorts of causes and effects in the world and universe. For
example, if one pushes a pool cue ball at the 8 ball, the person’s hand causes the cue ball
to move, which in turn causes the 8 ball to move as an effect. Next, we ask the question,
What is the cause of the cue ball? From there we look to the manufacturing process of
the cue ball. From there we look to the raw materials that the cue ball is made from as a
cause. From there we look to the Earth as the source or cause of the materials of the cue
ball. From there we look to the origins of the Planet Earth and the Universe. As we
continue, it is clear as a matter of logical that either there is an infinite series of causes,
which seems irrational from the point of view of a finite universe, or, alternatively, we
must logically infer that there is a Uncaused, First Cause, which is the Cause of all other
causes. Since there are rational natural laws in the Universe, we can logically infer that
Reason is the First Cause of the Universe. Reason can be logically described as God,
since in the Gospel of John, God is Reason or Logos. Now, the foregoing is a fairly
simple explanation of the Origin of the Universe with no extraneous assumptions. The
only other explanation that has been offered to explain the Origin of the Universe is that
the “Big Bang” is the Origin of the Universe. In fact , the Big Bang is just another name
for the Uncaused, First Cause or God and thus is not a more simple explanation with
fewer extraneous assumptions. The only other explanation being proferred is String
Theory which itself is Metaphysical and is once again analogous to the Uncaused, First
Cause.
Now, we can now consider another proof for God’s Existence from Thomas
Aquainas. As proven, above, the Universe has as its’ Original Cause, God, Who is the
First Cause and Reason. Next, we note that Universe is still in existence even though
scientists say that the Universe has been around for at least Trillions of years. The
question, then arises, how is it that the Universe stays in existence? Moreover, we must
wonder why the Universe stays in existence when Entropy occurs which dissipates
Energy from any System such as the Universe. We note that as a matter of experience
we can see that the Universe not only is in existence, but also that there is movement in
the Universe, in spite of Entropy. If Entropy were the only active natural law principle,
then it is apparent that the Universe would have started winding down, and would have
collapsed a long time ago. Instead the Universe is full of dynamic movement.
Logically, such movement in the Universe must have a source. Since an infinite regress
of movement is not possible in a finite Universe, we must logically conclude that there is
an Unmoved Mover that holds the Universe in Dynamic Existence. Such an Unmoved
Mover is known as Being or God. God as the Unmoved Mover is the only rational
explanation as to why Entropy has not destroyed the Universe as this point. Such an
does not involve extraneous assumptions. Thus, discussions of God cannot be excluded
by Ockham’s Razor.