0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
38 vues1 page
Rehabilitation for cancer patients should be better investigated focusing different goals in different stage of disease. Barthel Index improved in 47 (39%) patients, was stable in 20 (16%) and worsened in 54 (44%). After three months of rehabilitation, 72% of patients had an improvement in at least one domain scores compared with their baseline QoL scores.
Rehabilitation for cancer patients should be better investigated focusing different goals in different stage of disease. Barthel Index improved in 47 (39%) patients, was stable in 20 (16%) and worsened in 54 (44%). After three months of rehabilitation, 72% of patients had an improvement in at least one domain scores compared with their baseline QoL scores.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Rehabilitation for cancer patients should be better investigated focusing different goals in different stage of disease. Barthel Index improved in 47 (39%) patients, was stable in 20 (16%) and worsened in 54 (44%). After three months of rehabilitation, 72% of patients had an improvement in at least one domain scores compared with their baseline QoL scores.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Presenting author Role of Rehabilitation in Palliative Care
Andrea Pace Authors (max 6, presenting author included): Andrea Pace Email: pace@ifo.it Introduction: In patients affected by diseases with poor prognosis, the evaluation of efficacy of Phone rehabilitation should consider not only the functional gain but even the palliative effect on patients’ symptoms, particularly in the advanced phase of disease. The management of cancer patients in the terminal stage should always provide supportive care including rehabilitation Mobile phone strategies for prevention of complications and educational programs for caregivers to meet the patient’s care needs. The role of rehabilitation for cancer patients should be better investigated focusing different goals in different stage of disease: in the acute phase of disease it is aimed at obtaining a functional Please underline the most improvement, while in the phase of progression at the last stage of disease it is focused on the appropriate category for your patient’s quality of life, symptoms’ palliation, prevention of complications and improvement in abstract mobility and daily living activities. We report our experience of rehabilitation in home care setting for brain tumor patients. • Pain and other symptoms Objective: to determine whether a program of post-discharge rehabilitation at home in patients • Palliative care for cancer patients operated for brain tumor was associated with functional gain and improvement in Quality of Life • Palliative care for non cancer (QoL). Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-one patients affected by malignant brain patients tumor were enrolled in a program of post-discharge home care including neurorehabilitation. • Paediatric palliative care Functional outcome was evaluated with Barthel Index (BI) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) measured before and after rehabilitation. The impact of rehabilitation on quality of life was • Palliative care for the elderly evaluated with a quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30-BM 20). Results: Barthel Index • The actors of palliative care improved in 47 (39%) patients, was stable in 20 (16%) and worsened in 54 (44%). • Latest on drugs Only 54 patients completed the QoL questionnaire before and after treatment. After three months • Pain of rehabilitation, 72% of patients were found to have an improvement in at least one domain scores compared with their baseline QoL scores. • Illness and suffering through Conclusions: rehabilitation at home in brain tumor patients was associated with significant media functional gain measured both with BI and KPS. The benefit of rehabilitation may influence patient’s perception of quality of life. • Marginalisation and social stigma at the end of life • Palliative care advocacy projects
• Prognosis and diagnosis
communication in different cultures • Communication between doctor- patient and patient- equipe • Religions and cultures versus suffering, death and bereavement • Public institution in the world: palliative care policies and law • Palliative care: from villages to metropolies
• Space, light and gardens for the terminally ill patient
• End-of-life ethics • Complementary therapies Session: Rehabilitation in palliative care • Education, training and research • Fund-raising and no-profit Chair of the session: Claudio Pellegrini • Bereavement support • Volunteering in palliative care • Rehabilitation in palliative care