Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Enabling Environment for Software Engineering Industry:

A Strategic Framework of eSEE eAgenda 2002 and


eSEE eAgenda+ 2007
Zlatan Šabić, M.Sc., Ph.D. Tarik Zaimović, M.A. Nera Nazečić, M.A. Candidate
Candidate University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Programme Manager of eLeadership
University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Economics, and Programme for the Western Balkans,
Electrical Engineering, and eGovernance and ICT Portfolio and
eGovernment Specialist, UNDP BiH Manager, UNDP BiH, Head of eSEE Secretariat, UNDP BiH
+387 33 447 559 +387 33 563 848 +387 33 563 836
tarik.zaimovic@efsa.unsa.ba nnazecic@undp.ba
zsabic@etf.unsa.ba

Timur Gadžo Merima Avdagić, M.Sc.


B.Sc. E.E. The eGovernment Project Manager,
Head of Department for UNDP BiH,
Informatization, +387 33 563 850
Ministry of Communications and mavdagic@undp.ba
Transport of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
and eEnvoy of Bosnia and
Herzegovina to eSEE Initiative
+387 33 254 376
gtimur@gmail.com
ABSTRACT Europe 2007-2012”, signed in Sarajevo on 29 October 2007 at the
Modern technologies have the tremendous capacity to unleash the South Eastern Europe Ministerial Conference on Information
potential of the South Eastern Europe (SEE) countries, and to Society Development. This paper will also look into current
help increase their economic growth and foster their integration in trends and perspectives articulated in the second generation of
world market. This paper is set forth to analyze the policy impact Initiative activities and the Action Plan of the Taskforce for
of “eSEE Agenda for the Development of the Information Broadband, and their implications for Information Society
Society” (eSEE Agenda), as a regional action plan for Information development in South Eastern Europe as the basic software
Society development in SEE region implemented from 2002 to engineering development environment.
2007, including the policy impact to development of national
software engineering industries. As several reviews and reports Categories and Subject Descriptors
from recent South Eastern Europe Ministerial Conference on K.5.2 [Legal Aspects of Computing: Governmental Issues]:
Information Society Development (Sarajevo, October 2007) Regulation; K.4.1 [Computing Milieux: Computers and
indicate, the initial Agenda's aims have in good measure been Society: Public Policy Issues]: Regulation; K.1 [Computing
attained. Development of an enabling framework is largely Milieux: The Computer Industry]: Markets, Standards; D.2.0
complete, new ICT infrastructure is being introduced in [Software Engineering: General]: Standards
government departments and public institutions, a very wide
range of e-services for the public and business are either already
operational or close to becoming so. Recognition of this fact by General Terms
the members of the Initiative has led to an extension of the Management, Economics, Standardization, Legal Aspects.
initiative, with the agreement of a second phase, “eSEE Agenda
Plus for the Development of Information Society in South Eastern Keywords
policy, South Eastern Europe, SEE, eSEE, information society,
environment, software engineering, industry, strategic framework,
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for eAgenda
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies
are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that
copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy 1. INTRODUCTION
otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, As the political and economic map of European Union is redrawn
requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. through enlargements, Western Balkan countries risk being left on
SEESE’08, May 13, 2008, Leipzig, Germany. the margins of the new and integrated Europe and becoming an
Copyright 2008 ACM 978-1-60558-076-0/08/05...$5.00.
economically peripheral region. The eSEE1 Initiative expresses Recent efforts that culminated in the signing of the MoU on joint
the strategic effort of the Western Balkans to jointly employ cooperation towards the creation of Center for eGovernance
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) as a vehicle (CeGD) in Slovenia, is another example of successful eSEE led
for economic growth, employment rise, EU integration and long- regional cooperation. CeGD will be a valuable instrument in
term stability of the region thus preventing the risk of training and advising leaders and stakeholders in the use of ICT to
uncoordinated and incoherent approaches to ICT. The eSEE increase government efficiency and to improve democratic
Initiative provides a balanced policy and cooperation framework processes and thus to build open information societies, increase
and provides one of the best examples of regional cooperation in transparency, reduce corruption and minimize the digital divide in
the Stability Pact practice. South East Europe and the member states of the EU and the rest
of the world.
Both the UNDP and the Stability Pact have supported the eSEE
initiative since its inception under the Pact's Working Table II Future work of eSEE Initiative shall build on domestic and
(Economy). Since its creation in 2002, the eSEE Secretariat has regional actions, with the connection to European policies and
been hosted by the UNDP Country Office for Bosnia and practice, with participation of the signatories represented through
Herzegovina in Sarajevo. The eSEE Secretariat is an executive their Appointed Senior Policy Officials, under overall guidance of
arm of the eSEE Initiative, which is playing pivotal role in the eSEE Initiative Chair, and the support of UNDP funded eSEE
implementation of the Initiative objectives, and also acts as a focal Secretariat.
point for visibility of the Initiative.
As of this year, the successor to the Stability Pact, the Regional
By participating in eSEE Initiative, its members acknowledged the Cooperation Council, will also be based in Sarajevo. eSEE
importance of strengthening the regional approach towards the Initiative is planning to capitalize on continued strong
development of the Information Society, with the aim of avoiding engagement on the part of the Regional Cooperation Council and
the adoption of ad hoc solutions and technologies that lead to its Secretary General in furthering the cause of joint ICT agenda
inconsistent development, incompatibility between national and and the promotion of the Information Society and the Knowledge
local systems, and thus delay progress and implementation. By Economy in South Eastern Europe.
recently adopting the eSEE Agenda+ [1], which is closely aligned
This paper analyses the impact of eSEE Agenda, Regional Action
with the i2010 [2], a European Information Society for Growth
and Employment Action Plan and other globally recognized Plan for Information Society Development in South Eastern
Europe [3], adopted in 2002 by eSEE Initiative members. It also
approaches, the region expressed their determination to introduce
looks into current trends and perspectives articulated in the
compatible, innovative and interoperable technologies and
second generation of Initiative activities, and their implications
systems and integrated and interconnected networks, with the
for Information Society development in South Eastern Europe as
ultimate aim of transforming the South Eastern Europe into
the basic software engineering development environment.
prosperous, modern and stable region that can compete more
effectively in the global market economy.
2. eSEE AGENDA 2002
As a complementary process, eSEE Initiative is currently also
Mainstreaming ICT in the national development programs and
supporting the work of the Taskforce for Broadband in
segments of society such as governance, education, business, and
implementation of bSEE Action Plan, and their efforts to support
health is becoming increasingly more important for the SEE
the SEE participants in promotion of coordinated broadband
countries, as the region is moving towards EU integration process.
development, including the creation of domestic Broadband
Strategies, aggregating demand and local content, highlighting the Owing to the eSEE Initiative, for the past several years, SEE
importance of broadband development, raising funds for countries were fully focused on implementation of the
broadband activities and ultimately lowering the cost of commitments accepted in 2002 within “eSEE Agenda for the
broadband services in the region. Development of the Information Society” (eSEE Agenda) as a
basic document for IT development activities in SEE region. By
eSEE Initiative processes will be additionally strengthened by the
signing eSEE Agenda, SEE countries agreed to adopt it as their
upcoming UNDP led eLeadership Programme for the Western
principle vehicle for planning, coordinating, and implementing
Balkans. It will be implemented in cooperation with the eSEE
the development of an Information Society in South Eastern
participants through eSEE Initiative Secretariat, UNDP and the
Europe generally and in each of the co-operating countries/areas
Italian Government, with the aim of strengthening intra-regional
separately. This was followed by the Memorandum of
and international cooperation in South Eastern Europe by
Understanding on a Taskforce for Broadband, signed at the
encouraging and supporting collaborative actions in Information
Ministerial Conference at Thessaloniki [3] with a view to the
Society Technologies, especially in e-Governance and e-
implementation of the bSEE Action Plan. It includes Greece and
Democracy.
Romania as new members. Through this process, the eSEE
member countries also associated themselves unilaterally with the
objectives of the EU’s eEurope and eEurope+ processes and
1
eSEE Initiative members are: Albania, Bosnia and agreed specific actions within the constraints of their specific
Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, environment in the fields of:
Serbia and UNMIK/Kosovo. Romania and Greece are 1. Adoption of policy and strategy for the Information
participants in the bSEE Taskforce, while Romania has recently Society;
joined the eSEE Initiative formally by signing the eSEE Agenda
Plus.
2. Adoption and implementation of Legal Infrastructure focus on the area of telecommunications, e-commerce, e-
for Information Society accordingly to Acquis signature, law on cyber-crime and personal data protection. In
Communitaire settled within European Union countries; addition, important web based applications and a number of
information systems for civil and document registry, custom and
3. Establishment of regional cooperation and national
border service are in the process of implementation, or have been
implementation mechanisms;
successfully implemented.
4. Promotion of Information Society for development.
This status of implementation of eSEE Agenda is recorded in the
By adopting eSEE Agenda, the region of South East Europe has matrices prepared by eSEE Secretariat. Long version of the matrix
embarked on a broad strategy to promote the development of the is of a descriptive nature and it involves mostly qualitative data,
Information Society. The countries of the region have made focusing on the very process of implementation, while short
considerable progress on the tasks contained in the original eSEE version of the matrix is focusing solely on quantifiable data.
Agenda agreed in 2002. They have established a regional Matrices have proven a useful internal benchmarking tool of the
framework and put in place compatible national ICT development eSEE Initiative and are issued every two months by Secretariat of
policies and legislation, while designing and implementing a the Initiative in cooperation with the Appointed Government
range of exciting and inventive ICT, eGovernance, and public Officials.
administration reform projects in all areas of government. An overall conclusion that can be drawn from analyzing the
matrices is that the group is bringing the implementation of the
3. eSEE AGENDA IMPACT last few items of eSEE Agenda to the close. The first of the two
Agenda’s major commitments related to the creation of national
3.1 Implementation Progress 2002-2007 ICT for development policy as well as the institutional and legal
Related to implementation of eSEE Agenda commitments, rather mechanisms required for an information society have been
than adopt a one-size-fits-all approach, the eSEE focus has been implemented widely across the region. As the matrices indicate,
on finding solutions which respect each country's different needs these National Information Society Policies and National
and level of development, while preparing them all, individually Information Society Strategies and Action Plans are now largely
and together, for integration with the EU framework. Particular in place across the region, as are the planned programmes of
attention has been paid to developing (i) the enabling Policy putting in place the enabling legislation on topics such as
Framework, (ii) proper Institutional Framework, and (iii) the electronic communications infrastructure, e-commerce, e-
adequate Legislative Framework for each country to ensure contracts, and e-signatures. After nearly seven years of
appropriate and sustainable ICT development, with full and achievement, eSEE is widely recognized to be a good example of
appropriate harmonization with EU law and regulations. The regional co-operation.
eSEE Initiative aims to promote the best possible fit between the
countries of the region and the EU's own answer to the challenge However, while the results showcased in this matrix demonstrate
of ICT, eEurope+, the Lisbon Strategy, and the associated the easily quantifiable data, there are several items that could not
eEurope2002 initiative (with its later continuations - be seen from the enclosed short matrix, because of its quantitative
eEurope2005, and i2010). The Agenda has, therefore, a dual rather than qualitative perspective. Therefore, what can not be
aspect, with a regional dimension acting as the framework for co- seen is that new ICT infrastructure is being introduced in the
ordinated and mutually reinforcing activities at the national level. widest possible range of government departments and public
institutions. In addition, a very wide range of e-services for the
The first two of the Agenda's four major commitments are related public and business are either already operational or close to
to the creation of this regional framework and of national becoming so. A number of national information systems were
guidelines for ICT for development policy [4] as well as the implemented such Civil Registry and Residence, Document
institutional and legal mechanisms required for an information Registry for ID Cards and Driving License, Passport Document
society. These National Information Society Policies and National and Vehicle Registries, Police, Customs information systems and
Information Society Strategies and Action Plans are now largely Integrated Border Management system. Besides giving a factual
in place across the region, as are the planned programmes of status of eSEE Agenda implementation, for practical reasons, the
legislation on topics such as electronic communications matrix leaves out that many of the countries of the region have
infrastructure, e-commerce, e-contracts, and e-signatures. It is indeed adopted cutting edge national ICT development policies
interesting to note that in mid 2004 only Albania, Croatia and and legislation, designed and implemented a range of innovative
Montenegro had formally adopted national ICT strategies, and eGovernance initiatives, and public administration reform
Croatia was the only initiative member that had adopted almost all programme, while many have introduced the compatible,
key laws related to information society development [5]. Today’s interoperable and interconnected networks, technologies and
situation is quite the opposite. systems, with the ultimate aim of transforming the SEE into
The complete overview of 2007 status of eSEE Agenda stable, progressive and booming region that can compete in the
commitments is provided in an annex to this paper. As we can see, global market economy.
despite different starting points and country specific dynamics of
each member state, all the countries of the region have so far 3.2 Essential Impact of eSEE Agenda
formulated and adopted National ICT Strategies and nearly all As explicitly stated in the official final review of the eSEE
have formed State Cabinet Level Bodies responsible for their Agenda’s policy impact [6], the eSEE Agenda, in addition to
implementation. Legislation reform process is taking place in providing a policy and regional cooperation framework to IS
synchronized manner in all eSEE member states, with the main development, has inspired and supported significant changes in
IS development affairs within the signatory countries. The role in promoting IS development. In Serbia, laws on electronic
Agenda provided unique development framework that was signatures and on free access to public information were adopted
explored and used to different extents depending on specific after the eSEE Agenda. Similarly in Montenegro it led to the
situation in initiative members. In some cases, such as in Bosnia adoption of the law on electronic commerce and electronic
and Herzegovina, the Agenda was true enabler of strategic signature. In Croatia the Law on Digital Documents was inspired
planning processes that finally lead to formulation and adoption by the eSEE Agenda, as most of their other laws (as per the eSEE
of state level ICT policy, strategy and action plan, in situation requirements) were either already adopted, or were in drafting
where very few political and other factors were in favor of such stage.
development.
The eSEE Agenda has indirectly provided a framework for the
The eSEE Agenda supported the task of developing and adopting consolidation of ICT related activities taken up by other
strategies and action plans. Significantly, however, this support international organizations. As a consequence, the scope for
influenced the process towards an open and participatory partnership has expanded under the umbrella approach to IS
approach in several countries, including in Albania, BiH, development of the eSEE, and to which different agencies now
Macedonia, Moldova and Serbia. Working group of national align their ICT-related activities. For instance, in the province of
experts from different sectors (including government, private Kosovo, UNDP Kosovo, the Kosovo Fund for Open Society
sector, academia and civil society) were formed, with the support (KFOS), the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Regione
of UNDP national offices, and were entrusted with the task of Lazio have come together to fund the wiring of local government
drafting the national strategy and action plan. and e-governance projects in 19 municipalities. In Macedonia and
Serbia, UNDP and the Open Society are together supporting the
Members of these working groups were drawn from the most
development of national IS strategy through their respective
qualified and experienced people in the country. The open process
programmes. In addition, the work of eSEEurope Working Group
led to a high level of acceptance and ownership towards the
has benefited by the participation of South-eastern Europe
strategy document from the public, private and civil society
Telecommunications & Informatics Research Institute – INA and
sector, and also enhanced the strategic value of this activity.
South Eastern Europe Telecommunications Academy (SETA –
Also, the strategy formulation process initially inspired by INA Academy). Considerable assistance was provided in terms of
commitments under eSEE Agenda gained momentum of its own technical expertise in drafting the National Information Society
2
to create home-grown policies and strategies (for example, in Policies (NISP – eSEE Guidelines) .
Moldova, it led to creation of an additional strategy on E-
On the other hand, significant challenges still remain. Many of the
Governance and public administration reform, in BiH it led to
countries of the region have been in extended transition to a
involvement of IT in Public Administration Reform Strategy
market economy and all have been affected by a significant
endorsed in September 2006, in Croatia, National Programme on
development gap. All the countries are at different stages of IS
Information Security and the One Stop Shop Strategy
development. While some are facing the challenge of dealing with
(HITRO.HR) were created etc.).
obsolete, inappropriate, or seriously damaged infrastructure,
others are facing a lack of appropriate institutional capacity.
Creation and reorganization of institutions for the IS in most of Legislative and structural frameworks are not fully completed,
the involved countries was a direct impact of eSEE Agenda. In with resources (human, financial, etc.) often insufficient to carry
some countries, such as Croatia, a similar scenario related to through ambitious reforms. Exchange of experiences and
institutional development would most probably happen regardless knowledge in this area is an essential part of this process.
of the Agenda commitments (for example, Government Office for Moreover, SEE countries share common problems in this area
Internet Infrastructure Development was established in November such us capital shortage, hardware and software shortage,
2000 as a cabinet level body responsible for development of underdeveloped telecommunication infrastructures and
information society), but those commitments influenced the telecommunication market monopolies, low public awareness,
outcome, to differing extents, in all countries, including Croatia. need for improvement in digital literacy and skills by businesses,
On the other hand, there are examples where the creation of some organizations and consumers, necessity for organizational
bodies was a direct impact of eSEE Agenda (for example, in transformation and national economy reconstruction, need to
Macedonia, the IT department within the General Secretariat of follow social and cultural implications of new economy.
the government).
It would therefore be difficult to overstress the importance of the
However, several challenges face the development of IT capacities regional approach. For only a coherent region with seamless
in public administration in many of the eSEE countries. Some integration of major infrastructural and economic systems has any
relate to the need for better physical infrastructure, a prerequisite chance of successful interface with an increasingly unitary
to technically demanding information systems covering several European system.
institutions; others to the presence of the institutional capacity to
develop, update and maintain such systems, while in Bosnia and
Herzegovina the establishment of state level agency for
information society is still delayed due to complex political 2
configuration of the country. INA has assisted eSEE and in other major activities as
benchmarking ICT and training. It also acted as a liaison to the
The eSEE Agenda has enhanced the pace of policy development, private sector and to similar initiatives as ITU Centers of
especially within the legal framework of IS development. It Excellence. INA Academy supported the group with the
created awareness among policymakers on relevant laws and their provision of specialized training for the countries.
3.3 Impact to National Software Engineering the Bosnia and Herzegovina national Policy for IS development,
for the first time in any sectoral policy, explicitly states that
Industries “development of information and communications technologies
The issue of ICT industry development, especially software industry (software engineering, hardware, consultancy)” is one
engineering industry is related to overall information society of the IS development goals related also to overall economic
development. According to the experiences from many countries, development strategies. It also states that “information society
it is much more efficient and quicker to develop many attributes development will be followed by the industrialization in the area
of information society with parallel development of own ICT of ICT, especially in the software industry segment” [9].
industry, as a separate production line of the total economy of a This has raised the awareness that software engineering industry
country, than to develop the IS with someone else’s ICT industry. of all SEE countries are looking for help to increase the ability of
There are several benefits of this approach, in the social and local companies to participate in the production and delivery of
economic sense. The society will have its own development and software for domestic and export needs, resulting in various
research, which provides the foundation of permanent governmental measures towards creation of environment suitable
development and advancement of the society and economy in for the ICT industry development.
future. Without the development of the software engineering
industry, the society would be destined to permanent dependence 4. NEW DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
and hindrance of development.
OF eSEE AGENDA+
Despite pessimistic indicators with respect to the SEE economy, 4.1 eSEE Agenda+ Fact Sheet
the ICT industry is actually developing and spreading within the
region – it is one of the drivers of the economic growth. The The eSEE Initiative Working Group made a commitment in 2006
reason behind that lies in the fact that the ICT is not limited to that a further stage of the eSEE Agenda should be articulated and
only developed countries; instead, it represents global interest and agreed. Having an obligation to provide and implement
the interests of all in particular. Governments of almost all government services and to create and support environment for
countries within the region are trying to design or have designed other electronic services of the information society, the
effective policies to facilitate the use of ICT with the aim of governments of the region also felt that the time had arrived to
stimulating the economic growth. define and pursue a new set of goals that will jointly employ ICT
as tools for economic growth, job creation, EU integration, and to
The ICT industry is growing within the region. For example, the underpin long-term stability in the region.
IT market in Macedonia has increased from 37 million USD in
2000 to more than 50 million USD in 2003. In Croatia, even Drafting of the new document appropriately named “eSEE
though the number of ICT companies has not significantly Agenda Plus for the Development of Information Society in South
increased between 1994 and 2002 (15.76%), the gross income of Eastern Europe 2007- 2012” and commonly referred to as “eSEE
these companies has increased by 300%. Agenda+” started in April 2006 under the guidance of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. The adjustments were completed in the same year.
In addition, the segmentation is changing. Hardware sales still
dominate, but software development and services are taking larger The signing ceremony took place in Sarajevo on 29th of October
share of market (examples: Macedonia – software application 2007 at the “South Eastern Europe Ministerial Conference on
share increased from 15% in 2000 to 36% in 2003; Moldova - the Information Society Development”.
average growth of sales in software industry during the period
In eSEE Agenda+, the Governments of the countries of SEE and
2001–2003 was 50%, BiH software development share in 2005 3
The United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo
was 67.5%). By looking particularly at BiH the “eReadiness
stated that they were firmly resolved to pursue the priorities and
Assessment Report for 2005”, around 2.600 companies in BiH are
objectives defined by the document and would look to the eSEE
registered business in ICT industry [7]. Compared with the same
Working Group to ensure and monitor, within its responsibilities,
study for 2003 the number of registered ICT companies grew
their fulfillment, as a major step to a joint effort for building
tenfold.
Information Society in South Eastern Europe.
Moving to more macro perspective, according to the IDC [8] the
The signatories endorsed the following strategic framework, in
IT spending in some of the SEE countries in 2006 have been
order to encourage the development of information society in
rather respectable (Croatia 25%, Serbia 13% and Romania 36%),
eSEE Initiative member countries and The United Nations Interim
and respectfully GDP IT revenue share has also followed as much
Administration in Kosovo during the period 2007-2012:
as 5.6% in Serbia.
• they accepted the “i2010 – A European Information
However, it seems that governments do not always recognize
Society (IS) for growth and employment” as general
these potentials. There are resources (factories, companies) that
framework for IS development in the region;
have potential, but without serious governmental stimulation, that
potential cannot be developed. Governments are very often • they associated themselves with the priorities defined in
without managerial resources and available, updated and accurate “i2010” framework, but within the specific environment
data. of SEE region, and therefore rephrasing the defined
The eSEE Agenda and related national strategies have addressed
this issue well, and ICT industry, including software engineering 3
On behalf of Kosovo in accordance with United Nations Security
is treated as one of development priorities. As typical example, Council Resolution 1244 (1999)
priorities for IS development policies into the region Different starting points of signatory countries, as well as
specific priorities: fluctuating level of political commitment and resources available
between countries, will most likely influence the final outcome of
1. Further development of a Single SEE information
this action plan. However, having a regional master plan for
space which promotes an open and competitive
information society development provides the common ground
internal market for Information Society and media,
and thread of continuity in the light of the ever changing and
moving it toward a common European Information
politically unstable environment of SEE.
Space in terms of interoperability;
Signing of the eSEE Agenda raised the strategic importance of
2. Strengthening Innovation and investment in ICT
information society development activities at the national level in
research and education while working with the private
terms of the increase in level of awareness, commitment and
sector to promote growth and more and better jobs;
communication on IT issues.
3. Achieving an Inclusive Information Society that
The visible public impact is achieved by implementing
promotes growth and jobs in a manner that is
eGovernment services and eventually creating the One Stop Shop
consistent with sustainable development and that
strategy. Access to technology, e-Participation, and e-Democracy
prioritizes better public services and quality of life.
will lead to a cultural and social change. This will be facilitated by
While the i2010 initiative aims primarily to create growth and more affordable broadband networks and secure services. The
jobs in Europe's Information Society, the real driver of growth is knowledge building and resulting economic impacts are achieved
demand for services. It is based on consumers’ interest in the through fostering the development of e-Business and ICT
benefits of the technology: communication, entertainment, and research.
high quality services.
The eAgenda+ also envisages development of ICT private-sector
Those services are somewhat different from the region specific to be a part of key strategic development document of any of the
priorities, taking into account the previous developments in the respectful country. This was a case in the timeframe of eAgenda
European Union, which influenced the list of priorities as a and as a result the ICT industry representatives and associations
development framework for IS development. where key stakeholder and player in both development and
implementation of different country strategies (for example in BiH
While not including, for instance, some high definition audio Development Strategy, EU Accession Programme/Strategy and
visual services, eSEE Agenda+ defines a range of services, Public Administration Reform Strategy). Also, continuous work
apposite to the regional environment, including broadband within the sector, e.g. regular meetings with government and
communications, online content, interoperability, harmonization, participation in different government commission, provides to
ICT skills improvement, research, services for citizens and ICT industry a way for direct participation and influence over
services for business. upcoming government policies, laws, initiatives, etc. and thus
Within the defined priorities, grouped into three priority areas, the should directly help develop software engineering as a
signatories devoted themselves to accomplishing the detailed and fundamental part of any ICT industry in the region.
measurable list of objectives, within the concrete deadlines. In The document itself contains solid foundations for the regional
order to secure continuous implementation of the objectives of cooperation and projects with the common benefits. We can
eSEE Agenda+, the participants shall carry on annual domestic anticipate concrete regional coordination, collaboration and
benchmarking of an agreed subset of indicators used by EU for interactions, as well as promotion of the optimal practices and
the i2010 initiative. exchange of know-how. This can lead further to the
Implementation of the eSEE Agenda+ priority areas shall be interconnection to similar international initiatives.
facilitated through the platform provided by the eSEE Initiative In the process of implementation of eSEE Agenda+, the
Working Group, under the emerging cooperation framework, the participants consented to make provisions for collaborative
Regional Cooperation Council based in Sarajevo. actions and build strong partnership with the EU, encouraging the
institutions, businesses, and authorities to learn from their
4.2 eSEE Agenda+ Expectations experiences.
The eSEE Agenda+ expected impacts can be summarized as The reforms are supposed to be implemented within the
following: framework of harmonization with Acquis Communautaire with
• national development respect to all the respective commitments and obligations of the
participants with the EU. Opting to follow European programs
• regional cooperation and practice before accessing to EU, the signatories are sending a
strong signal for readiness towards EU compliance.
• EU complying
Aiming to improve regional cooperation, the participants shall
The central goal of those participating in the eSEE Agenda+,
build domestic and regional capacities to link professionals,
similar to the eSEE Agenda, including most of those active at the
business, and institutions across the region and EU. Creating a
national level, is to give a significant boost to the development of
single information space is facilitated by following European
the Information Society in their respective countries, and to
practice, interoperability and harmonization of rules.
prolong a momentum of regional cooperation that will also be
sustained into the future.
The eSEE Agenda+ has a prospect to generate ample momentum 6. REFERENCES
and fully enthuse policy makers and implementation entities more [1] “eSEE Agenda + for the Development of Information
widely by the ability to effectively coordinate across ministries, to Society in SEE 2007-2012”, Sarajevo, October 2007
reach out and enable the effective participation of other non- (http://www.eseeinitiative.org)
governmental stakeholders.
[2] “i2010 – A European Information Society for growth and
5. CONCLUSIONS employment”, Communication from the Commission to the
Council, the European parliament, the European Economic
As several reviews and reports from recent South Eastern Europe and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions,
Ministerial Conference on Information Society Development Brussels, 6 January 2005
(Sarajevo, October 2007) indicate, the initial Agenda's aims have
in good measure been attained. Not merely is the development of [3] “eSEE Agenda, Regional Action Plan for Information
an enabling framework largely complete, but new ICT Society Development in South Eastern Europe”, Belgrade,
infrastructure is being introduced in the widest possible range of October 2002. (http://www.eseeinitiative.org)
government departments and public institutions. In addition, a [4] “National Information Society Policies: eSEEurope Initiative
very wide range of e-services for the public and business are Common Guidelines”, UNDP Regional Service Centre,
either already operational or close to becoming so. Bratislava, November 2003
For the first time, the national sectoral policies and strategies put [5] “eSEEurope Regional ICT Sector Status and Usage Report:
the ICT industry, including software engineering, into the position Building an Information Society for All”, UNDP and
of one of the information society and overall economic Stability Pact for SEE eSEEurope Initiative, 2004
development priorities. [6] “The eSEE Initiative: Review of the eSEE Agenda’s Policy
eSEE Agenda has raised the awareness that software engineering Impact in the area of Information Society in SEE”, The Final
industries of all SEE countries are looking for supportive Report, UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre, 2006
governmental measures to increase the ability of local companies [7] “eReadiness Assessment Report 2005”, UNDP BiH, 2006.
to participate in the production and delivery of software for [8] “Comparative Overview of the Overall and Governmental IT
domestic and export needs. Spending in SEE countries”, IDC Adriatics, 2007
Implementing eSEE Agenda+ objectives will further raise [9] “Policy for IS development in Bosnia and Herzegovina”,
information society awareness and lead to the concrete activities Council of ministers of BiH, 2004.
throughout the whole government and further on amongst the
other stakeholders, citizens, and businesses.
Software engineering will be stirred even more with eSEE
Agenda+ than from eSEE Agenda, due to the fact that priorities
and focus groups are very diverse, still heavily relying on ICT
industry support for achieving its outcomes.
ANNEX: Overview of the Status of eSEE Agenda Commitments
Signatories of eSEE Agenda
eSEE Agenda commitment
Albania BIH Croatia FYROM Moldova Montenegro Serbia UNMIK-Kosovo
Adoption of Strategies ADOPTED (Y/N) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
for IS Development on
16
the basis of the common DATE OF January
10 April 2003 November 16 June 2005 9 March 2005 17 June 2004 9 October 2006 26 April 2006
guidelines prepared by ADOPTION 2002
2004
the eSEE WG
ESTABLISHED YES-NO NO YES YES-NO YES YES-NO YES YES-NO
Cabinet Level Bodies for Inter ministerial CIT fotmed in 2002, The Cabinet
Ministry for
the development of IS in committee Competencies co Secretariat for Level Body for IS
DATE OF In the December Telecommunication
line with ToR prepared formed in May shared with Min. of June 2001 Development – IT will be
ESTABLISHMENT procedure 2003 s and Information
by the eSEE WG 2005.National transport and Department established by 15
Society, May 2007
Agency for IS communications December.
ESTABLISHED YES-NO YES YES YES- NO YES YES YES YES
By-laws updated in
Legal framework on e- It is approved by
DATE OF September January 25 April 2005- still November 2007.
Signature CoM not Yet in 15 July 2004 24 September 2003 July 2005
ESTABLISHMENT 2006 2002 needs legal acts CA establishment in
Parliament.
procedure
ADOPTED (Y/N) NO YES YES NO YES YES NO YES
Legal framework on e-
Commerce DATE OF November October The Law will be Public discussion
22 July 2004 24 December 2004 July 2005
ADOPTION 2007 2003 adopted during 2007 under way
ADOPTED (Y/N) NO NO YES Information not YES YES YES YES
available
Law on Electronic It is approved by Based on Article 6 Covered by the
Documents DATE OF the CoM. It is not December of The Law on IS, Law on
15 July 2004 26.Decembar 2007
ADOPTION approved in 2005 published in Public Information
parliament Office Journal 12/96 services
YES-NO
RATIFIED (Y/N) YES YES YES YES signed but not NO NO YES
ratified
The internal legal
Law on Cybercrime Sanctions against Cyber
Convention framework was
crime articulated in
DATE OF was signed November adjusted. A National Laws
Chapter 28 as part of the 31 August 2006
ADOPTION in March 2001 separate law on adopted April 2005
Penal Code endorsed in
2006 cybercrime is under
2003
elaboration.
ADOPTED (Y/N) YES-NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Law on Approved by June 2004, electronic
DATE OF November New Law is currently being
Telecommunications CoM, not yet in July 2003 comm law adopted in November 2007 March 2003 May 2003
ADOPTION 2002 prepared
Parliament February 2005
ADOPTED (Y/N) NO YES YES YES YES NO YES-NO YES
2001 June 2003 January 2005 15 February 2007 Law proposal is in the Draft version July 2005
Law on Personal Data
DATE OF phase of pre-adoption by adopted by
Protection
ADOPTION Government Government in
January 2008.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi