Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract The number of companies attempting to benchmark the activities of their human-resource department that is, to compare it with different organizations considered to be the best in their class is growing. Discusses best practice in the area of people management, based on a benchmarking study of ve UK companies Elida Gibbs, Post Ofce Counters, the Nationwide Building Society, the National Westminster Bank and Birds Eye Walls.
Management Development Review Volume 10 Number 4/5 1997 pp. 179182 MCB University Press ISSN 0962-2519
Author/s
Recognition schems
Departmental lead teams make recognition a stimulating part of everyday work. Local recognition can earn employees a quality badge, free meals, radio, theatre tickets or a letter of appreciation. Corporate recognition can be through a presentation or mention in the company newsletter. A chairmans award has been introduced to encourage innovation. Winners, who can be teams or individuals, are selected by the chairman. They receive a trophy and wide publicity. Elida Gibbs recognizes the key role of its people in bringing about change. The company has set up an employee-development and communication group. It consists of the personnel director and a senior representative of each core business, and is directly responsible to the board. The group aims to: improve performance by developing total quality techniques, training programmes and appraisal systems; support managers in carrying out their new roles of learning and people development (there is no training department); and build communication mechanisms to ensure that the workforce is informed, involved and committed.
180
Author/s
implement ideas which will lead to improvement. Employees help to set up objectives, identify improvement opportunities, draw up improvement plans and measure progress. More than 1,200 improvement ideas surfaced within the rst six months of the programme. Subordinates work with their immediate bosses to get a better view of the business. Bosses assume the role of subordinate to get a feel of the problems faced by the workforce. A more open and less bureaucratic style of management is practiced than is traditional in banking. Subordinates take part in an upward appraisal system. Recognition is given regularly and consistently, with managers taking the lead.
A team-based empowerment workshop is being piloted to introduce and encourage a culture of empowerment. Employees are already empowered to act on improvement opportunities. Each division has its own communication plan, based on best practice as recommended by the central communication team. Forms of communication are a monthly news brieng, talking-shop sessions, focus-group discussions and staff-attitude and local diagnostic surveys.
181
Author/s
Benchmarking criteria 1. Leadership Top management commitment Recognition/appreciation policy Resources/assistance support Aggregate for leadership 2. People management (PM) Policy in PM Management structures supporting PM policy Training and development Involvement Communication Empowerment Teamwork Appraisal system Aggregate for PM 3. People satisfaction (PS) Methods used Feedback mechanism and action plan Aggregate for PS Total aggregate
Forum, under the auspices of the US Society for Training and Development, and the Australian Human Resource Benchmarking Programme, under the Saratoga Institute. Rank Xerox has a Best in Europe programme. Human-resource management benchmarking in Japan takes place through the transfer of employees between companies (shukko) and
through industrial cooperation (such as zaibatsus). Clearly, it is an idea whose time has come.
This is a prcis of a paper prepared by A. Hamzah Malaysia and Professor Mohamed Zairi, of the University of Bradford Management Centre, Bradford, UK.
182