Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
07 version
MBA elective, Spring 2007 Section 30: M & W 08:40-10:05AM, CBN 204; Section 31: M & W 10:15-11:30AM, CBN 204 Rob Grant Old North 405 Tel. 687 3844 grantr@georgetown.edu
Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business
Grading
1st coursework 2nd coursework 3rd coursework Final exam Class participation
15 15 15 35 20
The final exam is scheduled For Feb. 27, 12 noon to 2pm. The exam will be taken remotely. You will receive a short case in advance. Questions on the case will be made available electronically at the beginning of the
exam, you will then email your answers at the end of the exam. If the scheduled date is inconvenient, contact me and we can arrange alternative dates.
Coursework
Submit THREE pieces of coursework selected from the list of coursework assignments below. All coursework is to be submitted on the date of the relevant class discussion. Submit either in class, or by email (prior to start of class).
Coursework 1 Laura Ashley: Strategy Diagnosis. (For submission Jan. 10; to be undertaken individually or in groups of 2. Maximum length: 600 words.)
Mr. Cheong is seeking your analysis of the situation he faces at Laura Ashley and advice on what to do. Prepare a concise memo for Mr. Cheong that: 1. Assesses the seriousness of the financial situation at Laura Ashley. 2. Identifies the sources of poor performance. (Use the databoth the financial data and the qualitative informationto diagnose the sources of Laura Ashleys problems.) 3. Advises Mr. Cheong on what he should do. [Early Bird Special Offer : grades for this assignment will be receive an added 10% bonus that will be added to your grade.]
Coursework 2 MSB: Analysis of Resources and Capabilities. (For submission January 17; to be
undertaken in groups of 2).
Dean Daly has requested your input into a strategy formulation exercise for Georgetowns McDonough School of Business, prepare a brief memo (maximum length 2 pages) which: 1. Identifies the resources and capabilities important for success in the market for MBA education. 2. Evaluates the Schools strength (relative to the top 30 US MBA programs) in each of the above resources and capabilities. 3. Summarizes your analysis in the form of a table and figure similar to those in Table 5.5 and Figure 5.9 in Chapter 5 of Grant, Contemp. Strat. Anal., 5th. ed. 4. Presents your recommendations for a strategy that will enhance the School's competitive position in the market for MBA education over the next five years. [Note: You may base this coursework entirely on your own perceptions of MSB, other schools, and the US market for MBA education; however, you may also wish to refer to data available in the rankings published by Business Week, Financial Times and US News and World Report (see Blackboard)]
Coursework 3 Case Write-up: Eastman Kodak (For submission Jan. 24; to be undertaken in groups of 2)
Your Uncle Charlie has been appointed an independent member of Eastman Kodaks board of directors. In anticipation of a board-level review of corporate strategy, Uncle Charlie has asked for your assessment of Kodaks digital imaging strategy. Write a brief memo that explains the logic of Kodaks digital strategy, identifies the extent to which Kodak possesses the resources and capabilities needed to support the strategy, and assesses the potential of the strategy to deliver positive returns to Kodaks shareholders. [Maximum length: 700 words].
Coursework 4 Case Write-up: Booz-Allen Hamilton. (For submission Jan. 31; to be undertaken in groups of
2)
Brian Dickie has asked for your views on the issues facing BAH. Write a concise memo that (a) Comments upon the desirability of BAH moving towards a more product-based business model; (b) Identifies the reasons for the limited success of this strategy to date; (c) Makes recommendations for what BAH might do to overcome these impediments. [Maximum length: 700 words].
Coursework 5 Case Write-up: Raisio & Benecol [A] (For submission Feb. 5: to be undertaken in groups of
2)
What strategy alternatives does Raisio face in commercializing its stanol ester innovation. What are the key factors that Raisio should take into account in choosing between these alternatives? Does the licensing arrangement with J&J represent the best option available to Raisio? [Maximum length: 700 words].
Coursework 6 Case Write-up: Video Games. (For submission February 14). On the basis of an identification
of key success factors in the world market for video game consoles, a projection of how this market is likely to evolve, and an assessment of the companys resources, capabilities, and strategic goals, recommend a strategy for either Nintendo or Microsoft. [Maximum length: 700 words].
Readings
Most readings are available in electronic form on Blackboard (and also on the share (S:) drive under Grant,Rob/STRT609. For copyright reasons, some readings are only available in hard copy. These will be distributed to you in class.
PROGRAM
Wed. Jan. 10.
Objectives:
1. To emphasize the key role of performance diagnosis in strategy analysis. 2. To show the value of linking the quantitative analysis of financial statements with qualitative analysis of company events, CEO pronouncements, etc. 3. To build a bridge between financial and strategic analysis. 4. To examine the predicament of a company that is facing severe performance problems and take a systematic approach to diagnosing the sources of its difficulties. Grant Goals, Values, and Performance (Chapter 2 of Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th edition) [especially pp. 50-57]. Laura Ashley Questions for discussion: [a] Appraise Laura Ashleys financial performance [b] Identify reasons for deteriorating performance [c] Consider whether an how Laura Ashley might be restored to profitability
Reading: Case:
Wed.Jan. 17.
Objectives:
To gain expertise in identifying and appraising an organizations resources and capabilities and deriving strategy implications from such analysis. Grant Analyzing Resources and Capabilities and The Nature and Sources of Competitive Advantage (Chapter 5 of Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th edition); especially pp. 158-165 Additional readings for MSB discussion: Business Week, MBA Rankings ; US News & World Report, Best Graduate School; FT MBA Rankings and FT MBA Rankings Methodology (See Blackboard and S; drive for postings of relevant articles/data)
Reading:
Class discussion:
Reading:
Grant, Analyzing Resources and Capabilities and The Nature and Sources of Competitive Advantage (Chapters 5 and 7 of Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th edition)
Wed. Jan. 24
Reading:
Case:
Eastman Kodak: Meeting the Digital Challenge [S] Discussion questions: What is Kodaks strategy for developing its digital imaging business? What progress has Kodak made? What challenges does Kodak face and what are its prospects of becoming a leader in digital imaging? What advice would you offer Dan Carp?
Mon. Jan. 29
Developing Organizational Capability (continued)with special reference to capability development among sports teams.
(a) To develop the Kodak case discussion to look more generally at the challenges of developing organizational capabilities. 4
Objective:
Reading:
sports teams. Berman, Down & Hill, Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the NBA, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, Feb. 2002, pp. 13-31. [S] General discussion focusing upon examples of successful and unsuccessful team performance, the role of coaches, the determinants of coordination.
Class format:
Wed. Jan.31
Objectives:
Reading:
R. Grant, Contemporary Strategy Analysis (5th ed.) Appendix to Chapter 5. R. Grant, "The Knowledge-based View of the Firm" in Nick Bontis & Chun Wei Choo, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge: A Collection of Readings, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
Optional : Hansen, Nohria, Tierney, Whats Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review , March 1999 [You can access this via the library, alternatively,
can provide you with a copy]
Case:
Cultivating Capabilities to Innovate: Booz.Allen Hamilton [P] (# 9-698-027) Discussion questions: Assess BAHs initiatives in knowledge management and capability development so far? Is it desirable for BAH to become more product orientated? What should Dickies and Varasano do?
Wed. Feb. 7
Objectives:
Managing Innovation
To understand the determinants of competitive advantage in technology-based industries including issues of appropriability, first-mover advantage, and the role of standards and complementary resources. To be capable of analyzing and selecting the most appropriate strategy to exploit an innovation.
Readings:
Grant, Technology-Based Industries and the Management of Innovation (Chapter 11 of Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th edition)
Case:
Mon. Feb. 12
Objectives:
Readings:
Wed. Feb. 14
Objectives:
To recognize the role of industry standards in competition and industry evolution. To identify sources of network externalities. To develop expertise in formulating strategies for winning standards wars.
Reading:
C. Shapiro & H. Varian, The Art of Standards Wars California Management Review , Winter 1999 [S]
Case:
Wed. Feb. 21
New Directions: Novel Types of Organizational Capability; New Approaches to Capability Development
To identify examples of organizations that display unusual capabilities or novel approaches to capability development. To look at the role of alliances and networks in allowing firms to access resources and capabilities from outside their organizational boundaries. To consider organizational forms that allow capabilities to be created an deployed in new waysincluding open-source software communities. E. Beinhocker The adaptive corporation, McKinsey Quarterly 2006 (no. 2).
Objective
Reading: