..

l



U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
Office of the Clerk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel DEN
12445 East Caley Avenue
Centennial, CO 801115663
Name: CARBAJAL-ESPARZA, RAMIRO A 087-269262
Date of this notice: 1/24/2013
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Manuel, Elise L.
Sincerely,
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
lucasd
Userteam: Docket
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Ramiro Carbajal-Esparza, A087 269 262 (BIA Jan. 24, 2013)

U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
File: A087 269 262- Denver, CO
In re: RAMIRO CARBAJAL-ESPARZA
fN REMOVAL PROCEEDfNGS
APPEAL AND MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se
1
ON BEHALF OF DHS: P. Michael Truman
Assistant Chief Counsel
...
Date:
APPLICATION: Continuance; voluntary departure; termination
JAN .342013
The respondent, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals from a March 9, 2011, decision of
an Immigration Judge. The Immigration Judge found the respondent removable, declined to
continue his proceedings, denied his application for voluntary departure, and ordered his removal
to Mexico. During the pendency of this appeal, on November 15, 2012, the Depart:riJ.ent of
Homeland Security ("DHS") filed a motion to terminate the respondent's removal proceedings
without prejudice. The DHS seeks to terminate these proceedings because the respondent's
petition for U nonimmigrant status has been approved. The respondent has not filed a response
to the motion. Under the circumstances presented in this case, we find it appropriate to grant the
DHS's motion.
Accordingly, the following order will be entered.
ORDER: The Department of Homeland Security's motion to terminate is granted, the
Immigration Judge's decision dated March 9, 2011, is vacated, and these removal proceedings
are terminated without prejudice.
FOR THE BOARD
1
The respondent's prior attorney, Joel Anderson, Esquire, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel,
which we granted on July 8, 2011. The respondent states on appeal that he is represented by a
new attorney, but this individual has not filed a Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney
(Form EOIR-27).
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Ramiro Carbajal-Esparza, A087 269 262 (BIA Jan. 24, 2013)
.,..._


..
f" .
. , l
-
In the Matter of
RAMIRO
Respondent
IMMIGRATION COURT
621 17TH STREET, SUITE 300
DENVER, CO 80293
Case No.: A087-269-262
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE
This is a summary of the oral decision entered on
This memora dum is solely for the convenience of the parties. If the
procee gs should be appealed or reopened, the oral decision will become
the ficial opinion in the case.
1 The respondent was ordered removed from the United States to
XICO or in the alternative to . \
spondent's application for voluntary departure was denied and
spondent was ordered removed to MEXICO or in the
alternative to .
Respondent's application for voluntary departure was granted until
upon posting a bond in the amount of $
with an alternate order of removal to MEXICO.
Respondent's application for:
I 1 Asylum was ( ) granted ) denied ( ) withdrawn.
I 1 Withholding of removal was ( )granted ( )denied )withdrawn.
I 1 A Waiver under Section _____ was ( )granted ( )denied ( )withdrawn.
.;: .
I 1 Cancellation of removal under section 240A (a) was ( ) granted ( ) denied .,
( )withdrawn .
Respondent's application for:
Cancellation under section 240k(b) ( 1) was ( ) granted ) denied
( ) withdrawn. If granted, it is ordered that the respondent be issued
all appropriate documents necessary to give effect to this order.
Cancellation under section 240A(b) (2) was ( )granted ( )denied
( )withdrawn. If granted it is ordered that the respondent be issued
all appropriated documents necessary to give effect to this order.
Adjustment of Status under Section was ( ) granted ( ) denied
( )withdrawn. If granted it is ordered that the respondent be issued
all appropriated documents necessary to give effect to this order.
Respondent's application of ( ) withholding of removal ( ) deferral of
removal under Article III of the Convention Against Torture was
( ) granted I ) denied ( ) withdrawn.
Respondent's status was rescinded under section 246.
Respondent is admitted t.o the United States as a _____ until
As a condition of admission, respondent is to post a $ bond.
Respondent knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application .after proper
notice.
Respond
failure
Proceed
Other:
ent was advised of the limitation on nary
to appear as ordered in the Immigration 's o
ings were terminated.
-
re1'ef for
al ecision.
Date: Jan 5, 2011
I
''-.
"'
""' I''
D}!'vi b J. C DOVA
ImmigratioV Judge
Appeal: Waived/Reserved Appeal Due By: Apr 8, 2011

.. .--.
.;
..
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t