Design of An Evaluation Framework For Open Web Data Applications

Mo#va#on
Data on the Web
Some eyecatching opener illustra#ng growth and or diversity of web data
Design of an Evalua#on Framework for Open Web Data Applica#ons

Hendrik Drachsler, Slavi Stoyanov (The Open University of the Netherlands, NL): WP2 Lead
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12 25 February 2013
LinkedUp Vision
Adopting open Web data, educational and cross-domain resources to provide educational services up to university degree-level in open and distance education.
1) A domain-specific (educational) set of criteria
2) A generic set of criteria for the evaluation of open Web data applications.
There is a substantial risk that the evaluation criteria are not adequately specified." At what point are the criteria adequately specified? When the stakeholders agree with the criteria.
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
Development of the Evalua#on Framework

P1: Initialisation M0-M6: Preparation P2: Establishment and Evaluation
P3: Exit and Sustainability
M7-M18: Competition cycle M18-M24: Finalising

Comp etition
EF proposal
Expert validation
Draft
3x
Revie w of EF
Final release of EF
New versio n
Refin ement of EF
Literature review Group Concept Cognitive Mapping Mapping
Documentation Dissemination Practical experiences and refinement
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
Development of the Evalua#on Framework
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
LinkedUp
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping resembles the Post-it notes problem solving technique and Delphi method GCM involves participants in a few simple activities (generating, sorting and rating of ideas) that most people are used to.
GCM is different in two substantial ways: 1. Robust analysis (MDS and HCA) GCM takes up the original participants contribution and then quantitatively aggregate it to show their collective view (as thematic clusters) 2. Visualisation GCM presents the results from the analysis as conceptual maps and other graphical representations (pattern matching and go-zones).
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013

brainstorm
innovations in way network is delivered (investigate) corporate/structural alignment assist in the development of non-traditional partnerships (Rehab with the Medicine Community) expand investigation and knowledge of PSN'S/PSO's continue STHCS sponsored forums on public health issues (medicine managed care forum) inventory assets of all participating agencies (providers, Venn Diagrams) access additional funds for telemedicine expansion better utilization of current technological bridge continued support by STHCS to member facilities expand and encourage utilization of interface programs to strengthen the viability and to improve the health care delivery system (ie teleconference) discussion with CCHN
sort
Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4
Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49
Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39
...organize the issues...
2 1
n ic. s. atio ecif a sk rm t. t sp le t info tan no of por re ultip a e ud is im age m ns 2 4 ultit hat ctio an 3 ire am ew 5 om nd id an wt he 4 Sc dec ho kw d e r 3 an 5 3 cid wo nd De he 2 na ely 4 et 4 ctiv atio niz 3 ffe ga 5 orm Or ee 2 inf nt. 4 tim of ta 5 ge 1 r de 3 na 5 itu impo Ma ult 2 4 a m at is 1 1 3 an e wh 5 Sc cid 2 4 de 3 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 2 1 5 1 M
Ra
gS tin
e he
t
g ime et
ive e ct eff
ly
a an
Ma
na
ge
rc ou res
es
ec eff
ly. tive
rate
Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 7
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
10

map the issues...
organize
sort
Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4 Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49
Ra
4 1 2 3 3
ely . et he effectiv effectively s g S time tin Manage resource 1 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 1 3 2 3 3
Ma 2
na
ge
4 5
d an . ation ks. ecific inform t sp le tas no e of rtant. ltip are mu ltitudimpo ns ge na a muat is ectio ma an dir Sc e wh w to en cid wh de e ho rk cid wo d De e the ely n an niz tio ectiv ga ma eff Or or e inf tim 5 ge e of rtant. na 5 ltitudimpo Ma 4 a muat is 1 an wh 5 Sc cide 4 de 3 3 5 4 3 2
Information Services Community & Consumer Views
Technology
rate
Regionalization
Management Financing
STHCS as model
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
11

organize
sort
Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4
Information Services
Technology
Community & Consumer Views
Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49
Ra
4 1 2 3 3
Ma 2
na
ge
4 5
Regionalization
rate
map
Technology
Regionalization
Financing
Management Financing STHCS as model
Management
Mission & Ideology
...prioritize the issues...

Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 12
WP2 Progress
Invited 122 external experts 56 experts contributed 212 indicators for the evaluation framework After cleaning -> 108 indicators remained 26 experts sorted on similarity in meaning 26 experts rated on priority and applicability
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
13

A point map
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
14

A cluster map 15
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
15

A cluster map 6
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
16

Clusters labels
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
17

Rating Map Priority
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
18

Rating Map Applicability
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
19
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
20
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
21
Many thanks for your attention!

This silde is available at: http://www.slideshare.com/Drachsler Email: Skype: hendrik.drachsler@ou.nl celstec-hendrik.drachsler
Blogging at: http://www.drachsler.de Twittering at: http://twitter.com/HDrachsler
Hendrik Drachsler
25 February 2013
22
Practical experiences and refinement
Compe titions Review of EF
Draft
3x
New version
Refine ment of EF
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
23
LinkedUp in a nutshell LinkedUp in a nutshell

Challenge and evalua#on framework aimed at:
Web data
LinkedUp submissi on data
Personal data
Stage 1- Initialisation Initialisation 3 stages of the LinkedUp competition Stage 2

Lowest requirements level for participation Inital prototypes and mockups, use of data testbed required 10 to 20 projects are expected
Technological leap in robustness/scalability of (Big) data integraDon technologies (data analyDcs, mining, storage, analysis) Real-world use case scenario: paradigm shiI in Web-based educaDon by exploiDng open Web data
LinkedUp Challenge Environment LinkedUp Evaluation Framework Methods and Test Cases LinkedUp Data Testbed Competitor ranking list LinkedUp Support Actions Dissemination (events, training) Data sharing initiatives Community building & clustering Technology transfer Cashprice awards & consulting E T S

Participation criteria
Stage 3
Medium requirements level for participation Working prototypes, minimum amount of data sources, clear target user group 5 to 10 projects are expected
Challenge
Stage 4
Deployment in real-world use cases Sustainable technologies, reaching out to critical amount of users, 3 to 5 projects are expected
Network of supporting organisations (see 3.2 Spreading excellence, exploiting results, disseminating knowledge)
P S P F
C C
I E B O
Stefan Dietze 25/05/12 24
brainstorm
Counties 1 & 2 4.23 Mission & Ideology Financing Regionalization Management
County 3 4.4 Mission & Ideology Financing Technology Regionalization Information Services Management Community & Consumer Views 3.56
organize
sort
Ra
4 1 2 3 3
Ma 2
na
ge
4 5
Information Services Community & Consumer Views Technology
rate
map
3.55
r = .72
Regionalization
prioritize
Technology
STHCS as model Regionalization
...examine consensus...
Financing Management Mission & Ideology
Cogni#ve Mapping
1. Literature review of suitable evaluation approaches and criteria 2. Review of comprising initiatives such as LinkedEducation, MULCE, E3FPLE and the SIG dataTEL
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
26
brainstorm
Feasibility
organize
sort
76 75 25 62 22 1 34 17 45 2.47
33 37 10
2.6
R
1 2 3 2 3 2
t ee ectively ectively. Sh e eff eff ng Manage tim sources ati re

1 5
ecific inform t sp le tas no e of rtant. ltip are mu ltitudimpo ns ge na a muat is ectio ma an dir Sc e wh w to en cid wh de e ho rk cid wo 5 d De e the 4 ely n an 4 niz tio ectiv ga 3 5 Or orma e eff inf 4 tim 5 ge e of rtant. 3 na 5 ltitudimpo Ma 2 4 muat is a 1 3 an wh 5 Sc cide 2 4 de 3 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 2 1
Ma
na
ge
ation
an
d ks. .
rate
1.8 1.2
map
Importance
4.8
and drill back down to details for prioritizing action

prioritize
Community & Consumer Views Information Services Technology
Regionalization
4.23
4.4
STHCS as model
Regionalization
3.55
Financing Management Mission & Ideology
r = .72
3.56
LinkedUp in a nutshell Web LinkedUp in a nutshelldata

Web data
LinkedUp submissi on data
Personal data
Data management tools Storage AnalyDcs Linked Open data Mining (30+ billion statements) IntegraDon, mapping General Web data (OAI-PMH feeds, web metadata etc)
Stage 1- Initialisation Initialisation 3 stages of the LinkedUp competition Stage 2

Lowest requirements level for participation Inital prototypes and mockups, use of data testbed required 10 to 20 projects are expected
Medium requirements level for participation Working prototypes, minimum amount of data sources, clear target user group 5 to 10 projects are expected

LinkedUp Challenge Environment LinkedUp Evaluation Framework Methods and Test Cases LinkedUp Data Testbed Competitor ranking list LinkedUp Support Actions Dissemination (events, training) Data sharing initiatives Community building & clustering Technology transfer Cashprice awards & consulting E T S

Educa#onal data & resources OER metadata OpenLearn OpenCourseware Ariadne iTunesU EU project results
Participation criteria
Stage 3
Challenge
Stage 4
Deployment in real-world use cases Sustainable technologies, reaching out to critical amount of users, 3 to 5 projects are expected
Network of supporting organisations (see 3.2 Spreading excellence, exploiting results, disseminating knowledge)
P S P F
C C
I E B O
LinkedUp consor#um Data integraDon, Web technologoies, evaluaDon

ScienDc excellence in three strategic areas:
Data integraDon, Web technologies & evaluaDon EducaDonal technologies, (meta)data and resources DisseminaDon and exploitaDon of open Web data
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
29
LinkedUp consor#um Data integraDon, Web technologoies, evaluaDon

L3S Research Center, Leibniz University, DE Leading insDtute in Web science & data technologies as well as technology-enhanced learning Strong experience in coordinaDng EC R&D projects
KMI, The Open University, UK Leading R&D insDtute in areas related to LinkedUp Worlds largest distance university (over 200.000 students)
LinkedUp consor#um EducaDonal technologies, data & resources

Elsevier, NL Leading scienDc & educaDonal publisher InnovaDve research on the future of publishing & extensive experience in data compeDDons CELSTEC, The Open University, NL R&D insDtute in educaDonal technologies and part of the largest distance university in the netherlands L3S Research Center, Leibniz University, DE Leading insDtute in Web science & data technologies as well as technology-enhanced learning Strong experience in coordinaDng EC R&D projects
KMI, The Open University, UK Leading R&D insDtute in areas related to LinkedUp Worlds largest distance university (over 200.000 students) Exact Learning Solu#ons, IT SME in educaDonal technologies and services with long-standing experience in (EC-funded) R&D projects
LinkedUp consor#um DisseminaDon & exploitaDon of Web data

Elsevier, NL Leading scienDc & educaDonal publisher InnovaDve research on the future of publishing & extensive experience in data compeDDons CELSTEC, The Open University, NL R&D insDtute in educaDonal technologies and part of the largest distance university in the netherlands The Open Knowledge Founda#on, UK Not-for prot organisaDon to promote open knowledge and data; global network Host of key events (OKCon) and pla_orms (eg CKAN) KMI, The Open University, UK Leading R&D insDtute in areas related to LinkedUp Worlds largest distance university (over 200.000 students) Exact Learning Solu#ons, IT SME in educaDonal technologies and services with long-standing experience in (EC-funded) R&D projects L3S Research Center, Leibniz University, DE Leading insDtute in Web science & data technologies as well as technology-enhanced learning Strong experience in coordinaDng EC R&D projects
LinkedUp consor#um CollaboraDons: R&D projects

EC IP OKKAM: Web enDty idenDcaDon & discovery EC BPN mEducator: IntegraDon of educaDonal resources based on LOD EC STREP LUISA: SemanDc Web technologies for sharing of OER EC NoE STELLAR: educaDonal Web technologies network OpenScout: promoDon of use of open educaDonal content
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
33
LinkedUp consor#um CollaboraDons: R&D projects & events/iniDaDves

EC IP OKKAM: Web enDty idenDcaDon & discovery EC BPN mEducator: IntegraDon of educaDonal resources based on LOD EC STREP LUISA: SemanDc Web technologies for sharing of OER EC NoE STELLAR: educaDonal Web technologies network OpenScout: promoDon of use of open educaDonal content LILE: Linked Learning (Linked Data for EducaDon) workshop series LALD: Learning AnalyDcs and Linked Data workshop (series) LinkedEducaDon h`p://linkededucaDon.org LinkedUniversiDes h`p://linkeduniversiDes.org Joint special issues related to LinkedUp (SemanDc Web Journal and ILE) European AssociaDon for Technology- enhanced Learning (EATEL)
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
34
LinkedUp Other related iniDaDves from LinkedUp partners

Large-scale challenges & compe##ons
Open Data Challenge ( h`p://opendatachallenge.org/): Europes largest open data compeDDon, 430 submissions from 24 member states Elsevier Grand Challenge ( h`p://www.elseviergrandchallenge.com): communicaDon of scienDc informaDon. Seman#c Web Challenge ( h`p://challenge.semanDcweb.org/) large- scale SemanDc Web data applicaDons Seman#c Web Service Challenge ( h`p://sws-challenge.org) : evaluaDon of semanDc web service technologies
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
35

Web data dissemina#on and events

The Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon): annual open knowledge conference run by OKFN DataTEL theme team: gathering of open data within educaDon (OUNL) Open Government Data Camp: h`p://ogdcamp.org/ Open Data Handboook h`p://opendatahandbook.org/: living online manual for basic concepts of open data Topical working groups and hackdays, eg h`p://okfn.org/wg/
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
36

Web data dissemina#on and events

The Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon): annual open knowledge conference run by OKFN DataTEL theme team: gathering of open data within educaDon (OUNL) Open Government Data Camp: h`p://ogdcamp.org/ Open Data Handboook h`p://opendatahandbook.org/: living online manual for basic concepts of open data Topical working groups and hackdays, eg h`p://okfn.org/wg/
Data catalogues & (educa#onal) datasets

CKAN: CKAN is the Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network, the most important registry of open knowledge datasets (hosted and managed by OKFN). LUCERO, h`p://data.open.ac.uk: rst extensive Linked Data university dataset, approach adopted by many universiDes across Europe mEducator Linked Educa#onal resources: one of rst OER datasets in Linked Data cloud (LUH, OUUK)
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
37
LinkedUp Goals
Objective 1 Open Web Data Success Stories evaluate demonstrate support support create demonstrate create support
Educational Web data & technologies

Objective 2 Evaluation Framework for Open Web Data Applications
evaluate demonstrate / support evaluate
support create
Objective 3 Technology Transfer in the Education Sector

25/05/12 38
Stefan Dietze
LinkedUp Goals => tangible outcomes

Compe##on framework & community Evalua#on framework for large-scale Web data applicaDons (metrics, methods, benchmarks) Large-scale data testbed of evaluated datasets Cross-domain and applicaDon domain- evaluate specic aspects
demonstrate support
Objective 1 Open Web Data Success Stories create support create demonstrate support

support create

25/05/12 39
Stefan Dietze

Highly innova#ve, evaluated applica#ons of large-scale Web data Open compeDDon (LinkedUp Challenge) oers incenDve and support to steer submissions towards technological leap EducaDonal scenario: (a) challenging vision and (b) real-world scenario and requirements
demonstrate support support create demonstrate create
Objective 1 Open Web Data Success Stories evaluate
support

support create

25/05/12 40
Stefan Dietze

Technology transfer, increase in collabora#on and awareness (best prac#ces, clusters/communi#es, events) Transfer of innovaDve R&D results Signicant increase in awareness about open Web data and data integraDon create methods to produce scalable and robust informaDon systems of global relevance.
support
Objective 1 Open Web Data Success Stories evaluate demonstrate support support create demonstrate


support create

25/05/12 41
Stefan Dietze
LinkedUp ExploitaDon, disseminaDon, sustainability

Persistent LinkedUp Network (extensible community of industrial and academic ins#tu#ons) Commonwealth of Learning, COL (Canada) Athabasca University (Canada) SURF NL (Netherlands) Universit de Fribourg- Department of Computer Science eXascale Infolab Group Democritus University of Thrace Aristotele University of Thessaloniki (Greece)

International (outside Europe)
InsDtute for EducaDonal Technologies NaDonal Research Council of Italy Clam Messina Service and Research Centre Eurix

Dissemina#on events & plaYorms
Showcases & tutorials collocated with relevant conferences (WWW, ISWC, ESWC, ICDE, LAK etc) System demonstraDons Topical hackdays LILE, LALD, DataTEL workshop series (established, persistent and growing communiDes) Open Knowledge Conference OKCON LinkedEducaDon.org, LinkedUniversiDes.org
Clustering
Joint clustering acDviDes with related organisaDons (LinkedUp Network) and EC-funded R&D projects, such as LOD2 ARCOMEM SEALS, etc.
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
43

Dissemina#on events & plaYorms
Showcases & tutorials collocated with relevant conferences (WWW, ISWC, ESWC, ICDE, LAK etc) System demonstraDons Topical hackdays LILE, LALD, DataTEL workshop series (established, persistent and growing communiDes) Open Knowledge Conference OKCON LinkedEducaDon.org, LinkedUniversiDes.org
Clustering
Joint clustering acDviDes with related organisaDons (LinkedUp Network) and EC-funded R&D projects, such as LOD2 ARCOMEM SEALS, etc.
Viral dissemina#on channels

Sharing of publicaDons via Mendeley, Research Gate, CiteULike, Academia.edu AdverDsement of slides, showcases and demo videos on Slideshare, Youtube, Videolectures.net, Vimeo Social network channels such as Twi`er, LinkedIn Source code sharing via Source Forge Use of open licensing schemes (CC)
Standardisa#on

ParDcipaDon/support of standardisaDon of schemas and technologies through working groups (eg h`p://okfn.org/wg/) Data catalogues (eg CKAN) and community data portals (eg h`p://bibsoup.net/) StandardisaDon iniDaDves and working groups (eg CreaDve Commons LRMI)
LinkedUp Work plan: milestones

List and schedule of milestones Milestone Milestone name no. WPs. WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP6 WP1, WP4
MS1
Competition and evaluation framework established, challenge designed and initiated, data testbed provided. Initial cluster and community established
MS2
Stage 1
MS3 MS4
WP1, WP2, Stage 2 WP3 WP1, Applications developed and WP2, evaluated. WP3, Stage 3 WP5 WP1, Applications deployed and WP2, evaluated in wide network of WP3, institutions; evaluation framework WP5
Challenge submissions obtained and selected.
MS5
finalised and published. MS6
Impact achieved; exit and sustainability strategy implemented.
WP4, WP5
Stage 4
L e a d E x p e c t e d Means of verification participant Date LUH Challenge design developed (D1.1 M6 delivered), competition and evaluation framework established; initial calls published, initial dissemination actions conducted. D3.1a delivered; Critical amount of data consumers reached. OKFN D4.1 delivered. Initial dissemination and M6 clustering events organised. Minimum amount of subscribers to LinkedUp newsletters and websites. OUNL D2.3a Evaluation results LinkedUp M12 challenge (first stage) delivered. Initial version of handbook. OUNL D2.3 (a,b) are delivered, describing M18 evaluation results. Critical amount of technologies were evaluated and deployed (stage 3). OUNL D1.3 and D2.3(a,b,c) are delivered, M24 describing evaluation results. Critical amount of technologies were evaluated and deployed (stage 3). The evaluation framework has been published and refined (D2.2b). ELS Impact has been achieved. Exit and M24 sustainability plan has been developed (D5.2b) and implemented. Impact report delivered. Showcases published.
LinkedUp Management structure

Dr Stefan Dietze (LUH)
Ivana Marenzi (LUH) & Prof Wolfgang Nejdl (LUH)

LinkedUp Management structure
Dr Eelco Herder Dr Mathieu dAquin Dr Elisabe`a Parodi (LUH) (OUUK) (ELS) Dr Hendrik Drachsler Dr Laura James Dr Stefan Dietze (OUNL) (OKFN) (LUH)
Stefan Dietze

25/05/12 47
LinkedUp Next steps

Start date ProspecDve start date: 1 November (1 October feasible as well) Ongoing prepara#ons to enable quickstart Stang Sta planning already in place (Excel sheet to be presented) Job openings published (where applicable) Challenge design, community & clusters (MS1, MS2) Using established channels and events of LinkedUp partners (LinkedUp Network)
(M3)
D4.1
(M6)
MS1 - Competition & Evaluation Framework established, challenge designed and initiated, data testbed. D1.1, D1.2, D2.1, D2.2.1, D3.1.1, D3.2.1, D6.1.1 MS2 - Initial cluster and community established D4.2, D4.3, D4.4.1
Website (ahead of project start date) (M24) (M12) (M18)

MS3 - Challenge submissions obtained and selected challenge phase 1 D2.3.1, D4.4.2, D4.6.1, D5.1, D5.2.1, D6.1.2, D6.2.1 developed and and evaluated in wide Challenge design achallenge nd iniDalisaDon: iniDal calls expected by February evaluated network of institutions; phase 2 evaluation framework 2013 D2.3.2, D3.1.2, D3.2.2, finalised - challenge phase 3 D6.1.3 D1.3, D2.2.2, D2.3.3 , D3.3 MS4 - Applications MS5 - Applications deployed
MS6 - Impact achieved; exit and sustainability strategy implemented D4.4.3, D4.5, D4.6.2, D5.2.2, D5.3, D6.1.4, D6.2.2
Stefan Dietze
25/05/12
48

Design of An Evaluation Framework For Open Web Data Applications

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Design of An Evaluation Framework For Open Web Data Applications

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Mo#va#on

Data on the Web

Some eyecatching opener illustra#ng growth and or diversity of web data

Design of an Evalua#on Framework for Open Web Data Applica#ons

25/05/12 25 February 2013

1) A domain-specific (educational) set of criteria

Development of the Evalua#on Framework

P3: Exit and Sustainability

M7-M18: Competition cycle M18-M24: Finalising

Literature review Group Concept Cognitive Mapping Mapping

Documentation Dissemination Practical experiences and refinement

Development of the Evalua#on Framework

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49

Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39

...organize the issues...

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

map the issues...

Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39

ely . et he effectiv effectively s g S time tin Manage resource 1 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 1 3 2 3 3

Information Services Community & Consumer Views

Group Concept Mapping

Community & Consumer Views

Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49

Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39

ely . et he effectiv effectively s g S time tin Manage resource 1 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 1 3 2 3 3

Mission & Ideology

...prioritize the issues...

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Group Concept Mapping

Many thanks for your attention!

Blogging at: http://www.drachsler.de Twittering at: http://twitter.com/HDrachsler

Practical experiences and refinement

Compe titions Review of EF

LinkedUp in a nutshell LinkedUp in a nutshell

Stage 1- Initialisation Initialisation 3 stages of the LinkedUp competition Stage 2

Counties 1 & 2 4.23 Mission & Ideology Financing Regionalization Management

Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39

ely . et he effectiv effectively s g S time tin Manage resource 1 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 1 3 2 3 3

Information Services Community & Consumer Views Technology

STHCS as model Regionalization

Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39

t ee ectively ectively. Sh e eff eff ng Manage tim sources ati re

and drill back down to details for prioritizing action

LinkedUp in a nutshell Web LinkedUp in a nutshelldata

Stage 1- Initialisation Initialisation 3 stages of the LinkedUp competition Stage 2

LinkedUp consor#um Data integraDon, Web technologoies, evaluaDon

LinkedUp consor#um Data integraDon, Web technologoies, evaluaDon

LinkedUp consor#um EducaDonal technologies, data & resources

LinkedUp consor#um DisseminaDon & exploitaDon of Web data

LinkedUp consor#um CollaboraDons: R&D projects