Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

The original doc. at http://freeassemblage.blogspot.

com/2009/02/sacrifice-is-now-
american-policy-of.html contains hyperlinks to references.

Monday, February 23, 2009


Sacrifice is Now the American Policy of Washington

>Someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can
have more<

The Christian religion demands "sacrifice", obedience to the "commandments" given


through a supernatural entity to its adherents, and a "selflessness" which was
given the name--by the positivist philosophy of Auguste Comte--of "altruism."

It is not metaphysically natural for men to operate in a psychological structure-


of-mind that commits them to these things. Yet, this is also the structure-of-mind
we are being groomed to live by under the Obama administration.

As Michelle O explained, "The truth is, [ ] someone is going to have to give up a


piece of their pie so that someone else can have more." James Lewis American
Thinker

Sacrifice has become the purview of the government.

First, "sacrifice" must necessarily mean giving up something of greater value for
something of lesser value, else it could not be sacrificial. For example, to give
a tithing to your church is not a sacrifice if you think the work of the church is
worth your money. It is only when you think your money could be used better
elsewhere, but you are psychologically coerced by the culture of the church to
give your money to them, that this act would be a sacrifice.

If we are expected to sacrifice part of our pie to someone who wants a piece of
the pie that is not his/hers, we are expected to acquiesce. We are mandated by the
Federal government to be our brother's keeper. This gives us little or no personal
fiscal resources with which to protect ourselves. Now we must count on the
government to take from our neighbors in order to give to us, after taking from us
to give to another neighbor.

Second, commandments are impossible to follow to the letter and in spirit, one-
hundred percent of the time. Commandments were made to be broken--so that
Christians would have a "cross" of their own to bear. Such "crosses" are called by
many names, one of which is the "original sin" of being "only" a human who cannot
be perfect, but needs salvation.

In order to follow the commandments one-hundred percent of the time would take
sacrifices that mere humans are not prepared to make. To "love thy neighbor as thy
self" even when every thing your neighbor believes in and stands for would destroy
every thing you believe in and everything you stand for--most certainly is
impossible for mere humans to accomplish. Tell me how an American can love Osama
bin Laden as he loves himself.

Ask yourself what kind of God would command you to love bin Laden. What God would
ask that you altruistically not kill a man who is raping your wife? The New King
James Version changed "thou shalt not kill" to "“You shall not murder", yet since
the time of King James or before it was "kill." Manslaughter which is killing,
however, is not murder. But it is killing. Manslaughter is often accidental, so
the only reason the NKJV does not say "You shall not commit manslaughter" is
because sometimes it isn't done on purpose; but you still go to prison for it.
What God would "visit the iniquity of the fathers on the children"?

I had a conversation with a group of men a few years ago, and one man who had been
a failure all his life at nearly everything he tried, said with an air of
resignation that he had "sacrificed his whole life."

At that moment it was not clear just what he meant. Someone who knew him much
better than I challenged him.

"You have not!" said the man. "You don't know what it means to sacrifice, or you
would have been successful by now."

The first man replied, "You are wrong. It is because I sacrificed that I failed. I
sacrificed a good job with a good employer for the whim of starting up my own
business when I had no aptitude for business. I sacrificed my marriage for a one-
night stand. I sacrificed my health by getting drunk every night before going
home, and it put me in the hospital with cirrhosis of the liver. I sacrificed my
college education when I quit because the leftist teaching of the university
pissed me off. One liberal philosophy teacher actually said I would grow out of
the beliefs I had at the time. The problem is, I never outgrew those beliefs. I
believe in them more strongly than I did then. But I sacrificed them, too, by not
living up to them."

"Well," said the second man, "that isn't what I meant by 'sacrifice.' I mean you
didn't try hard enough by giving up the things that would have made you a
success."

"And I still say you're wrong," said the first man. "If I had given up what was
necessary to be successful, that wouldn't have been sacrificing anything, it would
only have been paying the proper price for the things I valued. Instead, I paid
too little, and the sacrifice was getting nothing at all in return for what I did
pay.

"The ultimate payment is my failure. All those years that I had a good job, all
those years that I had wonderful wife are water under the bridge. I didn't do
anything to put them in the bank. I robbed the bank. And now here I sit without
any retirement, living from food stamps, taking temporary jobs because with my
work history I can't get anything else considering the hard economic times we're
in.

"Do you see what I'm saying?" he asked. We could all hear the regret in his voice,
the self-judgment, and the recognition that he had finally learned the meaning of
the word "sacrifice."

"If I had not done the wrong things, if I had not fallen short of doing what
needed to be done at all the important moments in my life, I wouldn't feel as if I
just want to cry over spilt milk right now. There wouldn't be any spilt milk. I'd
have a refrigerator full of it, instead of a pocket full of food stamps.

"Do you understand me now? I didn't pay enough for the things I wanted. That was
the sacrifice--losing the things I had because I didn't want to pay the piper what
he was worth. The things I wanted were worth more than I was willing to pay. That
is sacrificial. I sacrificed myself by being cheap."div align="justify">If the
life you want is more important than love, it's no sacrifice. If living anywhere
with the one you love is more important, THAT is no sacrifice.

Sacrifice means to give up what is more valuable for what is less; otherwise the
word has no moral meaning.
On this basis I argue that Jesus' death was no "sacrifice" because the saving of
souls was more important than one man's life. But there is another aspect: Jesus
is believed by many to be God himself incarnate, meaning he knew he couldn't die
anyway, so giving up his carnate life on the cross turns out to be a big cosmic
joke played on humanity--it was no sacrifice, it was sleight of hand.

Yet, the Catholic church takes this stance:

"On account of the remarkable and unique coincidence of the priest, victim, and
acceptor of the sacrifice, a first question arises as to whether Christ was victim
and priest according to His Divine or according to His human nature. On the basis
of the dogma of the hypostatic union the only answer is: although the God-Man or
the Logos Himself was at once both priest and victim, He was both, not according
to His Divine nature, but through the function of His humanity." [emphasis added]
Catholic Encyclopedia

This means that it is even important for the Church to sacrifice the "dogma of the
hypostatic union" of Jesus being God himself--for the lesser value of Jesus being
a man.

It means nothing if God was sacrificed. God cannot die. Jesus was said to have
been dead for three days before he was bodily taken to heaven. This dogma is
necessary to convince us that upon death we no longer must bear the burden of
being "just a man," but will, as did Jesus, be ressurected into a union of
hypostasis with God. In other words, to achieve this blessed union we must live
the sacrifice of being mere mortals first.

It is not a sacrifice to be mortal, to be man, to be animal.

"I stand here on the summit of the mountain. I lift my head and I spread my arms.
This, my body and spirit, this is the end of the quest. I wished to know the
meaning of things. I am the meaning. I wished to find a warrant for being. I need
no warrant for being, and no word of sanction upon my being. I am the warrant and
the sanction." Ayn Rand; Anthem [emphasis added]
If your marriage is more important to you than a fling with someone you discover
and have a passion for, it is no sacrifice to forego the fling.

Into the boundary


Of each married man
Sweet deceit comes calling
And negativity lands
Cold cold heart
Hard done by you
Some things look better baby
Just passing through
And it's no sacrifice
Just a simple word
It's two hearts living
In two separate worlds
Elton John

The "sweet deceit" of giving up a piece of your pie so that others can have what
is yours is the deceit of Christian brotherhood transformed into social policy.
So, why does everyone ask if we are willing to sacrifice this or that, for this or
that?

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the SM of


The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism TM,
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger ©,
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra ©, and
The Metaphysical Naturalist ©,
are the educational arms of the LLC and are:
© 2008-2009 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing ®
mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi