Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
\
|
=
min max
min max
) (
I I
O O
K slope Line Straight Ideal (1.1)
min min
) ( I K O a Intercept Line Straight Ideal = (1.2)
) 1 ( / 041 . 0
25 90
2 . 1 74 . 3
1 results Set C V K =
|
.
|
\
|
=
) 2 ( / 039 . 0
25 90
22 . 1 77 . 3
2 results Set C V K =
|
.
|
\
|
=
040 . 0 =
Average
K
23 . 0 = a
63 . 2 =
+ =
Ideal
Ideal
O
a I K O
Un-insulated Thermistor span:
min max
I I span Input = (1.3)
65
25 90
=
=
span Input
span Input
min max
O O Span Put Out = (1.4)
57 . 2
2 . 1 77 . 3
=
=
Span Put Out
Span Put Out
Daniel James Watkins [Static and Dynamic Calibration of an Insulated and Un-insulated Thermistor]
BEng Mechanical Engineering Page 9
Un-insulated thermistor linearity:
) (
min
min max
min max
min
I I
I I
O O
O O
|
|
.
|
\
|
= (1.5)
) 25 65 (
25 9
2 . 1 77 . 3
2 . 1 57 . 2
|
.
|
\
|
=
58 . 1 37 . 1 =
Insulated thermistor span:
43 . 0
33 . 1 75 . 1
65
25 90
=
=
=
=
Span Output
Span Output
Span Input
Span Input
Insulated thermistor Linearity:
27 . 0 91 . 0
) 25 . 65 (
25 90
33 . 1 75 . 1
33 . 1 41 . 0
=
|
.
|
\
|
=
From observation of the graph, there was error occurred during the experiment. The static
sensitivity was calculated as 0.04 V/C. It can be said that the un-insulated thermistor was more
suitable for the static calibration.
Daniel James Watkins [Static and Dynamic Calibration of an Insulated and Un-insulated Thermistor]
BEng Mechanical Engineering Page 10
Experiment 2: Dynamic Calibration
Graph 2.1: Dynamic Calibration without insulation
Graph 2.2: Dynamic Calibration with insulation
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 5 10 15 20 25
S
e
n
s
o
r
o
u
t
p
u
t
(
V
)
Time (s)
Dynamic Calibration with out Insulation
Test 4
Test 3
Test 2
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.6
1.65
1.7
0 200 400 600 800
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
(
V
)
Samples
Dynamic Calibration with Insulation
Daniel James Watkins [Static and Dynamic Calibration of an Insulated and Un-insulated Thermistor]
BEng Mechanical Engineering Page 11
The graph of the results obtained for un-insulated indicated that the maximum value is 2.9 with the
minimum value of 1.40.
The Y value from the graph can be calculated as follow:
( ) | |
V Y
Y
22 . 2
4 . 1 632 . 0 4 . 1 7 . 2
=
+ =
The time constant of 0.632 (value of step change) indicates in percentage form of 63.2%
To find the X value, straight line was plotted at 90 degrees against the Y value at 2.2. The X value
was found to be 5.5 seconds (Time Constant)
5 . 5 = t Seconds (time constant), Sampling rate = 50 Samples/1 Second = 50 samples/sec
The time constant (t ) is estimated at 5.5 seconds from the un-insulated graph which represent the
dynamic performance for first order instrument.
The results obtained from the computer software displayed that the maximum value of insulated
test is 1.66 with the minimum value of 1.44.
( ) | |
) . ( 115
115
6 . 1
44 . 1 632 . 0 44 . 1 66 . 1
ant const Time
X
V y
y
=
=
=
+ =
t
Mathlab software and Laplace Transform was used to calculate time constant in both cases. The
time constant for un-insulated themistor was found to be less than the insulated one.
Conclusion
Overall, the results obtained for both Static and Dynamic experiments were fairly accurate.
However, there were minor errors occurred which may have cause by human in term of inaccurate
data observation, systematic or self-heating etc.
It was observed for the static calibration that the un-insulated thermistor was the best option to be
used for the experiment due to its least error. For the dynamic calibration, the time constants were
compared and the un-insulated thermistor was found to be more appropriate for the dynamic
calibration.
Also, from the experimental observation, it can be stated that the instrument system might
encounter some error due to chemical reaction, dirt and dust in the laboratory environment.
Therefore, the instrument system should be examined at particular time intervals maintaining the
international standards. The regular reports of the instrument examined should be preserved further
accuracy
Daniel James Watkins [Static and Dynamic Calibration of an Insulated and Un-insulated Thermistor]
BEng Mechanical Engineering Page 12
Reference
- Bolton, W. (1991) Industrial Controls & Instrumentation, Essex: Longman Group UK Limited,
p.8-10.
- McGee, T. (1988) Principles and Methods of Temperature Measurement, New York: John
Wiley & Sons, p.206, 466-474, 504-511.
- Sachse, H. (1975) Semi-Conducting Temperature Sensors and Their Applications, New York:
John Wiley & Sons, INC., p.159-165.
- Leigh, J. (1991) Temperature Measurement & Control, Herts: Peter Peregrinus Ltd., p.24-26.
- Childs, P. (2001) Practical Temperature Measurement, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann,
p.39-41.
- Benedict, R. (1984) Fundamentals of temperature, Pressure, and Flow Measurements, 3rd
ed. 1984: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p.146.
- Figliola, R. and Beasley, D. (2006) Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 4th ed.
New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p.12-15.
- National Instruments (2011) Temperature Measurement, [online] Available at:
http://www.ni.com/temperature/ [Accessed: 10th Dec 2011].
Daniel James Watkins [Static and Dynamic Calibration of an Insulated and Un-insulated Thermistor]
BEng Mechanical Engineering Page 13
Appendices
Sensors Calibration
Calibration consists of determining the indication or the output of a temperature sensor with
respect to a standard sufficient number of known temperatures so that, with acceptable means of
interpolation, the indication or output of the sensor will be known over the whole range of
temperature used (Benedict, 1984, p146). The problem areas of calibration are immediately
apparent; four main points must be available:
1. Means for measuring the output of the temperature sensor
2. A satisfactory temperature standard
3. Controlled temperature environments
4. A scheme for interpolating between calibrations points (Benedict, 1984).
As Benedict (1984, p147) described, the environments for calibration distributed into two classes
depending on the method of determining the temperature of the test sensor.
Firstly, the sensor is exposed to a fixed-point environment so that under particular conditions,
naturally exhibits a state of thermal equilibrium whose temperature is established numerically by
the IPTS without recourse to a temperature standard. Secondly, the test sensor and temperature
standard are simultaneously exposed to a controlled-temperature environment whose temperature
is established by the standard instrument (Benedict, 1984).
Static Calibration
Static calibration is the most common type of calibration. For this procedure, known value is input to
the system under calibration and the system output is recorded. The term Static implies that the
values of the variables involved remain constant. In static calibrations, only the magnitudes of the
known input and the measured output are important (Figliola et al. 2006).
Dynamic Calibration
Dynamic variables are time dependent in their magnitude and frequency content. Dynamic
calibration determines the relationship between an input of known dynamic behaviour and the
measurement system output. Normally, these calibrations involve applying sinusoidal signal or a
step change as the known input signal (Figliola et al. 2006).