Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
net
http://www.f1technical.net/features/10586
Inerter dampers
Even before Renault had adopted the TMD, McLaren had picked up on work completed by Malcolm C. Smith at the University of Cambridge, His lecture to the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) in August 2003, explained the systems principles, making the mechanical system analogous a passive electrical system. His proposal was a dual flywheel set inside a damper body operated by a rack\pinion. As force is applied to the endpoints of the device, the flywheels accelerate producing an opposite and equal force. In this layout the Inerter is akin to a bicycle bell, the force from your finger is opposed by the spinning of the bells ringer. Smith also put forward alternative embodiments with a flywheel concentric to a threaded damper rod and also a hydraulic solution.
1 of 3
3/1/2013 12:36 AM
http://www.f1technical.net/features/10586
Cross section of the J-damper, showing the eyes for Mounted between the suspension rockers, the mounting the casing to one suspension rocker and J-damper is inactive in body roll and only operates the threaded rod to the other. The flywheel (in red) in vertical movement or jounce, hence its name spins in the bearings (yellow) to absorb and release kinetic energy
Adoption in F1
It is believed the solution was then picked up by McLaren and developed in associated with Smith during 2004. This reached maturity when the system raced for the first time at San Marino in late April 2005. Packaging the system on a Formula1 car precluded the rack and pinion Bicycle bell from Smiths Lab tests and the concentric version has been adopted. The Inerter is mounted in place of the usual heave damper, thus the set up is decoupled from roll. As the system is relatively light (~3Kg) and easy to package it can be fitted front and rear. At the front on the McLaren the inerter is hidden inside the footwell of the monocoque, while at the rear being mounted high above the gearbox the device is in clearer view. McLarens long running practice of using large diameter hollow Titanium heave spring hides the detail of the device, making its existence hard to spot. With TMDs being banned in August 2006, many teams were left without the benefit of an alternative solution. With Smiths work being public and nothing in F1 being secret for very long, the Inerter solution has been adopted by other teams. Exactly who is a matter of conjecture, Williams technical director feels "Most teams have been using them for a couple of seasons now". Ferrari are believed to be the first of the other teams to race Inerters. As an ex-TMD user, the team were struggling against McLarens better mechanical grip through out 2007. Late in the year the team raced their solution in Monza, the tell-tale large heave damper fitted to the rear of the car, certainly improved their grip. But the system caused a race retirement for Felipe Massa, when the inerter failed after 10 laps. Recent comments from Renault's director of engineering, Pat Symonds suggests Renault have now adopted the technology. Their debut being delayed by the need for Renault to be transparent, in not using any of McLarens intellectual property in their interpretation of the solution. Although not confirmed by Renault they are understood to have raced their solution at this years Spanish GP.
2 of 3 3/1/2013 12:36 AM
http://www.f1technical.net/features/10586
intellectual property in their interpretation of the solution. Although not confirmed by Renault they are understood to have raced their solution at this years Spanish GP. As with TMDs the Inerter is said to be worth two tenths per lap and a sizable advantage for any team in what is now a tyre controlled formula.
Legality
As the Inerter becomes more common place in F1, its long served covert use at McLaren, raises the issue that the device, which ostensibly is the same as the TMD, was not banned by the same interpretation of the rules. While the FIAs banning of TMDs on aerodynamic grounds was tenuous, but matched common understanding of the system at the time, was more related to fears that ever heavier and complex TMDs would be fitted creating a safety fear should they break loose. The Inerters advantage is that they are lighter and a recognisable part of the suspension, thus are well contained within chassis in the event of an accident. Again Sam Michael explains "These are different to mass dampers and fully legal because they are part of the suspension system". Thus it appears that the Inerter is likely to remain within the sport and perhaps be expanded into other high aspect tyre ratio formulae, where vertical tyre deflection produces unwanted disturbance to the suspensions work.
As published in Racecar Engineering magazine Text and illustrations by Craig Scarborough Image by Ian Harris
3 of 3
3/1/2013 12:36 AM