Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
This ebook is a part of the FREE online course entitled Facebook Law in India
For details, visit: http://www.asianlaws.org/free.php
www.asianlaws.org | info@asianlaws.org
Page | 1
Think before you post Before posting on Facebook, ask yourself one question. If this comment were about my family, or me, would I be offended? If your answer is yes, DO NOT post.
Page | 2
Published in 2012 by Asian School of Cyber Laws Copyright 2012 by Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. The information in this book is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No part of this book may be reproduced or otherwise used without prior written permission from the author unless such use is expressly permitted by applicable law. No investigation has been made of common-law trademark rights in any word. Words that are known to have current trademark registrations are shown with an initial capital and are also identified as trademarks. The inclusion or exclusion of any word, or its capitalization, in this book is not, however, an expression of the publisher's opinion as to whether or not it is subject to proprietary rights, nor is it to be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark. This book is provided "as is" and Asian School of Cyber Laws makes no representations or warranties, express or implied either in respect of this book or the software, websites and other information referred to in this book. By way of example, but not limitation, Asian School of Cyber Laws makes no representations or warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose or that the use of licensed software, database or documentation will not infringe any third party patents, copyrights, trademarks or other rights.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 3
Contents
1. Is it legal to ridicule a Government official or Minister on Facebook? .........................................................................................8 2. Is it legal to ridicule a celebrity or even an ordinary person on Facebook? ....................................................................... 15 3. Is it legal to ridicule a religion on Facebook? ................... 20 4. Is it legal to refer to a politician as corrupt on Facebook? ............................................................................................. 25 5. Is it legal to call someone an idiot on Facebook? ........ 30 6. Is it legal to call someone a fat pig on Facebook? ....... 35 7. Is it legal to refer to someone as having ugly pimples on Facebook? ...................................................................................... 40 8. I have ordered some stuff from a famous ecommerce website. They have not sent it even after a month but my credit card has been charged for the transaction. Is it legal to post my complaint about this on my Facebook wall? .. 45
Page | 4
9. Do Facebook related laws violate the Constitution of India? ...................................................................................................... 47 10. Is it legal to open a Facebook account in a fake name? ................................................................................................................... 49 11. Can I use my favourite celebritys name and open an account on Facebook? ..................................................................... 54 12. Someone has tagged me in an offensive photo. Is that legal? ....................................................................................................... 59 13. Is it legal to post obscene photos / videos on my wall or page? ................................................................................................. 62 14. A friend has posted an obscene photo of themselves on their own wall. Since I can see that photo, can I file a case against my friend?............................................................... 68 15. Is it legal to use abusive language in posts? ................... 74 16. If I use asterisk marks instead of abusive words, can I still get into trouble?........................................................................ 77 17. Someone has sent me a threatening message on Facebook. Is that a crime? ............................................................. 80
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 5
18. As a joke, I have put a morphed photo of my friend on Facebook. She has taken it as a joke, but her father is very angry with this. Can he file a case against me? .................... 86 19. What kind of posts can land me in prison? .................... 88
Page | 6
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 7
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
Page | 8
Offence
Bailable?
Sedition
Life imprisonment Unlimited Fine 2 years Unlimited Fine 3 years Unlimited Fine
No
Defamation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 9
The details
Sedition Depending upon the exact content of the message or post, ridiculing Government officials or Ministers could be termed as sedition, which is defined in section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. Sedition refers to spoken words, written words, photos, cartoons etc that could: 1. bring the Government into hatred or contempt, 2. excite disaffection (disloyalty and all feelings of enmity) towards the Government Exceptions: Comments expressing strong disapproval of the measures or actions of the Government do not amount to sedition if they are: 1. with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, 2. without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection
Defamation A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 10
A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 11
4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Indecent representation of women Indecent representation of women means the depiction of the figure or body part of a woman in a manner that is indecent, derogatory or denigrating. Or which is against public morality. Posts, comments, pics etc that indecently represent women are punished under section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.
Page | 12
Some Cases
Two Air India cabin crew members were arrested and jailed for 12 days for posting derogatory remarks against the Prime Ministers Office, the national flag and the Supreme Court, while commenting on a strike by Air India pilots. (India, May 2012).
Ahmad Shuman was arrested for creating a Facebook page criticizing Lebanese President Michel Sleiman. (Beirut, July 2010).
Vikas Mavhudzi was arrested for subverting a constitutional government when he posted a facebook message in support of the protests in Egypt. (Zimbabwe, April 2011)
Page | 13
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 14
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act 7 Sections 3 and 4 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act
5 6
Page | 15
Defamation
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 16
The details
Defamation
A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Page | 17
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Indecent representation of women "Indecent representation of women" means the depiction of the figure or body part of a woman in a manner that is indecent, derogatory or denigrating. Or which is against public morality. Posts, comments, pics etc that indecently represent women are punished under section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.
Page | 18
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 19
national-
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code 10 Section 298 of the Indian Penal Code 11 Section 66A of the Information Technology Act
8 9
Page | 20
Promoting enmity on grounds of religion Outraging religious feelings Wounding religious feelings Sending offensive electronic messages Imputations, assertions prejudicial to nationalintegration
No
3 years jail Unlimited Fine 1 year jail Unlimited Fine 3 years jail Unlimited Fine
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Page | 21
The details
A comment, post, photo, cartoon etc that promotes disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities is penalized under section 153A of the Indian Penal Code. This section also penalizes acts which are prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities. Further this section also penalizes acts which disturb or are likely to disturb public tranquillity.
A comment, post, photo, cartoon etc that outrages the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India is penalized by section 295A of the Indian Penal Code. This section also penalizes a comment, post, photo, cartoon etc that insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of any class of citizens of India.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 22
Wounding religious feelings A comment, post, photo, cartoon etc that is made with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person is penalized by section 298 of the Indian Penal Code.
Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 23
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 24
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
12 13
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 25
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 26
The details
Defamation
A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Page | 27
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 28
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 29
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
14 15
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 30
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 31
The details
Defamation
A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Page | 32
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 33
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 34
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
16 17
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 35
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 36
The details
Defamation
A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo, cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Page | 37
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
A related case
Farah NurArafah, an 18-year-old, was given a 75-day suspended jail sentence for calling her friend a promiscuous, overweight pig on Facebook. (Indonesia, February 2010)
Page | 38
Page | 39
Whats covered? Facebook posts, messages, comments etc. Even liking or sharing these posts could get a person into trouble.
18 19
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 40
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 41
The details
Defamation
A comment that harms the reputation of a person comes under the definition of defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. A persons reputation is harmed if the comment, photo cartoon etc does the following in the estimation of others: 1. lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person 2. lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or profession, 3. lowers the credit of that person, 4. causes it to be believed that the persons body is in a loathsome or disgraceful state. Did you know? 1. Even companies, colleges, organizations can be defamed. 2. Sarcastic comments can also amount to defamation
Page | 42
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 43
I have ordered some stuff from a famous ecommerce website. They have not sent it even after a month but my credit card has been charged for the transaction. Is it legal to post my complaint about this on my Facebook wall?
Yes
Page | 44
8. I have ordered some stuff from a famous ecommerce website. They have not sent it even after a month but my credit card has been charged for the transaction. Is it legal to post my complaint about this on my Facebook wall?
Yes. Remember the following points while making this post: 1. State only facts. 2. Do not make any sarcastic statements.
Page | 45
No
Page | 46
Page | 47
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 48
Punishable under section 465 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act 22 Section 469 of the Indian Penal Code
20 21
Page | 49
Forgery
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Page | 50
The details
Forgery Creating a facebook account in a fake name (or someone elses name) amounts to creating a false electronic record under section 464 of the Indian Penal Code. Since the creation of this fake account is made with an intention to enter into a contract with Facebook, this amounts to forgery under section 464 of the Indian Penal Code. This section applies where the fake account is created for reasons including the following: 1. with the intention to cause damage or injury to the public 2. with the intention to cause damage or injury to a person 3. to enter into a contract 4. with the intention to commit fraud
Forgery for purpose of harming reputation When a fake account is created for the purpose of harming someones reputation then it is penalized by section 469 of the Indian Penal Code.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 51
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 52
No
Page | 53
11. Can I use my favourite celebritys name and open an account on Facebook?
No. This is a serious offense and simply creating the account in a celebritys name makes the creator liable for 2 years imprisonment. If the person sends even one message, posts one comment or sends even one friend request using this account, the liability could be another 3 years in jail! Simply creating the account in the celebritys name amounts to forgery23. If the account is used, then it amounts to sending offensive electronic messages24. Further if the fake account was created for the purpose of harming the celebritys reputation, then it amounts to forgery for purpose of harming reputation25.
Punishable under section 465 of the Indian Penal Code Section 66A of the Information Technology Act 25 Section 469 of the Indian Penal Code
23 24
Page | 54
Forgery
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Page | 55
The details
Forgery Creating a facebook account in a celebritys name amounts to creating a false electronic record under section 464 of the Indian Penal Code. Since the creation of this fake account is made with an intention to enter into a contract with Facebook, this amounts to forgery under section 464 of the Indian Penal Code. This section applies where the fake account is created for reasons including the following: 1. with the intention to cause damage or injury to the public 2. with the intention to cause damage or injury to a person 3. to enter into a contract 4. with the intention to commit fraud
Forgery for purpose of harming reputation When the account is created for the purpose of harming the celebritys reputation then it is penalized by section 469 of the Indian Penal Code.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 56
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Page | 57
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 58
26
Yes
The details
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 60
No
Page | 61
Section 67 of the Information Technology Act Section 67A of the Information Technology Act 29 Section 67B of the Information Technology Act
27 28
Page | 62
Posting obscene photos / videos Posting sexually explicit photos / videos Posting photos / videos depicting children in a sexually explicit act
Yes
No
No
No
No
Page | 63
The details
Posting obscene photos / videos To be considered obscene for the purpose of section 67 of the Information Technology Act, the matter must satisfy at least one of the following conditions: 1. it must tend to excite lust, or 2. it must arouse interest in lustful thoughts, or 3. it must cause a person to become morally bad. The above conditions must be satisfied in respect of a person who is the likely target of the material. Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern. Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes.
Photos / videos depicting a sexually explicit act Section 67A of the Information Technology Act penalizes publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act in the electronic form. Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 64
Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes. Photos / videos depicting children in sexually explicit act Section 67B of the Information Technology Act penalizes publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in a sexually explicit act in the electronic form. The word children means persons who have not completed 18 years of age. This section penalizes the following: 1. Publishing or transmitting electronic material which depicts children engaged in sexually explicit acts or conduct 2. Causing to be published or transmitted electronic material which depicts children engaged in sexually explicit acts or conduct 3. Creating text or digital images depicting children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner 4. Collecting, seeking, browsing, downloading, advertising, promoting, exchanging or distributing electronic material depicting children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner 5. Cultivating, enticing or inducing children to online relationship with one or more children for a sexually explicit act
Page | 65
6. Cultivating, enticing or inducing children to online relationship with one or more children in a manner that may offend a reasonable adult 7. Facilitating abusing children online 8. Recording in any electronic form abuse pertaining to sexually explicit acts with children Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern. Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes.
Page | 66
A friend has posted an obscene photo of themselves on their own wall. Since I can see that photo, can I file a case against my friend?
Yes
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 67
14. A friend has posted an obscene photo of themselves on their own wall. Since I can see that photo, can I file a case against my friend?
Yes. This is a serious offense and makes the person posting the obscene photos / videos liable for 3 years imprisonment30. If the photos / videos contain a sexually explicit act, then an additional liability of 5 years imprisonment is created31. If the photos / videos depict children in a sexually explicit act, then an additional liability of 5 years imprisonment is created32.
Section 67 of the Information Technology Act Section 67A of the Information Technology Act 32 Section 67B of the Information Technology Act
30 31
Page | 68
Posting obscene photos / videos Posting sexually explicit photos / videos Posting photos / videos depicting children in a sexually explicit act
Yes
No
No
No
No
Page | 69
The details
Posting obscene photos / videos To be considered obscene for the purpose of section 67 of the Information Technology Act, the matter must satisfy at least one of the following conditions: 4. it must tend to excite lust, or 5. it must arouse interest in lustful thoughts, or 6. it must cause a person to become morally bad. The above conditions must be satisfied in respect of a person who is the likely target of the material. Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern. Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes.
Photos / videos depicting a sexually explicit act Section 67A of the Information Technology Act penalizes publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act in the electronic form. Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 70
Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes. Photos / videos depicting children in sexually explicit act Section 67B of the Information Technology Act penalizes publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act in the electronic form. The word children means persons who have not completed 18 years of age. This section penalizes the following: 1. Publishing or transmitting electronic material which depicts children engaged in sexually explicit acts or conduct 2. Causing to be published or transmitted electronic material which depicts children engaged in sexually explicit acts or conduct 3. Creating text or digital images depicting children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner 4. Collecting, seeking, browsing, downloading, advertising, promoting, exchanging or distributing electronic material depicting children in obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner 5. Cultivating, enticing or inducing children to online relationship with one or more children for sexually explicit acts
Page | 71
6. Cultivating, enticing or inducing children to online relationship with one or more children in a manner that may offend a reasonable adult 7. Facilitating abusing children online 8. Recording in any electronic form abuse pertaining to sexually explicit acts with children Exceptions are provided if the material is for public good in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or other objects of general concern. Exceptions are also provided for material which is kept or used for bona fide heritage or religious purposes.
Page | 72
No
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 73
33
Yes
The details
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 75
If I use asterisk marks instead of abusive words, can I still get into trouble?
Yes
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 76
16. If I use asterisk marks instead of abusive words, can I still get into trouble?
Yes. Even if you use asterisk marks (e.g. instead of fool, you say f**l), if the meaning is apparent, then it would be punishable with upto 3 years imprisonment34.
34
Yes
The details
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 78
Yes
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 79
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code 37 Section 507 of the Indian Penal Code
35 36
Page | 80
Sending offensive messages Sending threatening message Sending serious threat message Message from fake account
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page | 81
The details
Sending offensive electronic messages Sending offensive electronic messages is penalized under section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The following types of posts will be covered under this section: 1. posts that are grossly offensive (e.g. cause anger, displeasure, resentment) 2. posts that are menacing or threatening 3. posts that contain false information sent for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will. 4. posts or messages sent for causing annoyance, or inconvenience, 5. posts or messages sent to deceive or to mislead about the origin of the messages.
Sending threatening message may amount to criminal intimidation as defined under section 503 of the Indian Penal Code.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 82
This section applies when someone threatens another with: 1. physical injury 2. damaging the reputation 3. damaging the property The threat need not necessarily relate to the victim. The threat could be made in relation to the victims family, friends, colleagues, employees etc. This section applies when the threat is made to alarm the victim or force the victim do something (or omit to do something). Note: Sending an appropriate legal notice would not amount to criminal intimidation even when the notice threatens legal action against the persons property.
Sending serious threat This is covered by section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and applies if the threat is to cause: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. death, grievous hurt, destruction of any property by fire, murder, rape, dacoity maligning character of a woman etc
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 83
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. Sending threatening messages from a fake account If the threatening message is sent using a fake account (or in any manner to hide the name and details of the sender), then it is covered by section 507 of the Indian Penal Code.
Page | 84
As a joke, I have put a morphed photo of my friend on Facebook. She has taken it as a joke, but her father is very angry with this. Can he file a case against me?
Yes
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 85
18. As a joke, I have put a morphed photo of my friend on Facebook. She has taken it as a joke, but her father is very angry with this. Can he file a case against me?
Yes. If her father finds it offensive, he can file a case and it can be penalized as sending offensive messages and is punishable with upto 3 years imprisonment38. If the photo is obscene then there is an additional liability for 3 years imprisonment39.
38 39
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act Section 67 of the Information Technology Act
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 86
Also
Do not open a Facebook account in a fake name. Do not open an account on Facebook using a celebritys name. Do not tag someone in an offensive photo. Do not post obscene photos / videos. Do not use abusive language on Facebook. Do not send threatening messages.
(c) 2012 Rohas Nagpal. All rights reserved. Page | 88
This ebook is a part of the FREE online course entitled Facebook Law in India
For details, visit: http://www.asianlaws.org/free.php
www.asianlaws.org | info@asianlaws.org