+

lheses on tbe ?bilosophy

of llifiory

able was ffansparent from all sides. Acnrally, a litrle hunchback wh3 yas.ap experr chess player sat inside and guided the puppet's hand by m91s-of One can imaginia philosophidal -suingp. counterpert to this device. The puppet called ,,hisiorical materialism" is to win all the rr--". ft cin earity be a match for anyone if it enlists the service_s of theology, which todey, .. *. loro*, is wizened and has to keep out of sight.
II

that it could play q winning game of chesq answering each movt ot an opponent with e countermove. A puppet in Turkish attire and with a hookah in it' mouth sat befori a itrcssboard placed on a large table. A system of mirrors creared the illusion that this

Th" rtgy

told of an automaton construcred in such L way

instances, thc frecdom fro-m envy which thc present displiys to-

"One of the most remarkable charactcristics of humen nrn,'e," writes Lotze, 'tsn alongside so much selfishness in specific

ward the furure." Reflection sh6ws rs that our image o'f trappi25'

Ilbnhntions
ness

Tbescs on the Pbilosopby

of History

is thoroughly colored by the time to which the course of our own existinie has assigned us. The kind of happiness that could arouse envy in us exists only in the air we have breathed, among people we could have talked to' women who could have rll given-themielves to us. In other words, our image of happiness is indissolubly bound up with the image of redemption. The same applies to onr view of the past, which is the concern of history. The past carries with it a temporal index by which it is referred to redemption. There is a secret agreement between Past generations and the present one. Our coming was exPected on tarth. Like every generation that preceded us, we have been endowed with a tueaft Messianic power, a Power to which the past h* I claim. That claim cannoi be settlid cheaply. Historical material'' ists are aware of that.
I I I

manifest themselves in this suuggle as courege, humor, cunning, and fortitude. They have retroactive force and will constantly call in question every victory, pest and present, of the rulers. As flowers turn toward the 2q by dint of a secret heliouopism the past strives to turn toward that sun which is rising in the sky of

history.

historical materialist must be awere

of this mo$ in-

conspicuous

of all transformations.

v The true picture of the past flits by. The pest cen be seized only as an image which flashes up et the instant when it can be recognized and is never seen again. "The truth will not run ewey from us": in the historical oudook of historicism these words of Gottfried Keller merk the exact point where historical materialism cuts through historicism. For every image of the past that is not recognizedby the present as one of its own concerns threatens to disappear irretrievably. (The good tidings which the historian of the past brings with throbbing heart may be lost in a void the very moment he opens his mouth.) VI
i

III

A chronicler who recites events without distinguishing be' tween major and minor ones acts in accordance with the follow ing truth:' nothing that has ever happened should be -regarded as loit for history. to be sure, only a redeemed mankind rcceive$ the fullnes of its past-which is to say, only for a redeemed man' kind has its past become ciable in all its moments. Each moment it has lived b."o*et a citation d tordre du iour-*d that day is' Judgment Day.
IV
Seek

for food and clotbing first, then tbe Kingdorn of God shall be added unto yoa.

-Hegel, r8o7 The class struggle, which is always Present to a historian in' fluenced by Marif is a fight for the crude and material thinge' without *hi"t no refined and spiritual things could exist. Neverrl theless, it is not in the form of the spoils which fall to the victo! that the latter make their presence felt in the class struggle. Thcy,
2t,l

To articulate the past historically does not mean to recognize really was" (Ranke). It means to seize hold of a memory as it flashes up at a moment of danger. Historical materialism wishes to retain that image of the past which unexpectedly appears to man singled out by history et a moment of danger. The danger affects both the content of the uadition and its receivers. The same threat hangs over both: that of becoming a tool of the ruling classes. In every ere the ettempt must be made anew to wrest tradition away froin a conformism that is about to overpower it. The Messiah comes not only as the redeemer, he comes as the subduer of Antichrist. Only that historian will have the gift of fanning the spark of hope in the past who is frmly convinced tha,t even the dead will not be safe from the enemy if he wins. And this enemy has not ceased to be victorious.

it "the way it

2tt

w
Illuminationt
Tbeses on the Philosophy

of History
He regards it as his trdr !O

ates himself

from it

as

far

as possible.

VII

brush history against the grain.

In

Consider tbe ilarkness and tbe gredt cold tbis aale which resounds asith mysery,

-Brecht, THE THREErENNy opEnl To historians who wish to relive an era, Fusrel de Coulanges recommends that they blot out everyrhing they know about the later course of history. There is no better way of characterizing the method with which historical materialism has broken. It is a process of empathy whose origin is the indolence of the heart, acedia, which despairs of grasping and holding the genuine historical image as it flares up briefly. Among medieval theologians it was regarded as the root cause of sadness. Flaubert, who was familiar iritf, it, wrote: "Peu de gens det;ineront combien il a fallu 6tre triste pour ressusciter Cirthage." * The narure of this sadness stands out more clearly if one asks with whom the adherents of historicism actually empathize. The answer is inevitable: with the vicror. And all rulers are the heirs of those who con. quered before them. Hence, empathy with the victor invariably benefits the rulers. Historical materialists know what that means. Whoever has emerged victorious participates to this day in the triumphal procession in which the present rulers step over those who are lying prosuate. According to traditional practice, the spoils are carried along in the procession. They are called cultural treasures, and a historical materialist views them with cau. tious detachment. For without exception the cultural treasures he

VIII

The tradition of the oppresed teaches us thet the "statc of emergency" in which we live is not the exception but the rulc. We must attain to a conception of history that is in keeping with this insight. Then we shall clearly retlize that it is our task to bring about a real state of emergency, and this will improve

our position in the struggle against Fascism. One reason why

Fascism has a chance is that in the name of progres its opponcnts

treat it as a historical norm. The current amazement that thc things we are experiencing are "still" possible in the twentieth century is not philosophical. This emazement is not the beginning of knowledge-unless it is the knowledge that the view of history which gives rise to it is untenable.

IX
Mein Fliigel ist ztsr?, Scbumng bereit, ich kebrte gem ntrilck, denn blieb icb auch lebendige Zeit, icb hiine oxnig Gldick.

surveys have an origin which he cannot contemplate without horror. They owe their existence not only to the efforts of the great minds and talents who have created them, bur also to thc

toil of their contemporaries. There is no document of civilization which is not at the same rime a document of barbarism. And just as such a document is not free of barbarism, barbarism taints dso the manner in which it was transmitted frorn one olvner to another. A historical materialist therefore dissocianonymous r "Few will be able to ate Carthage."
2t6
guess

-Gerhard Scholem, "Gruss vom Angelus" A Klee painting named "Angelus Novus" shows an angel looking as though he is about to move away from somerhing hc i3 fixedly contemplating. His eyes ere staring, his mouth is opcn, his wings are spread. This is how one pictures the angel of history. His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive o chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling

wreckage uiron wreckage and hurls

it in front of his feet. Thc

angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make wholc whst has been smashed. But a storm is blowing from Paradise; it hes

: My uting is reody for fligbt,

how sad one had to be in order to resuscil

I tuordd like tu urn baek. If I nayed timeler time, I ,ttutld hwe little lack.
2t7

Illuminations

Tbeses on tbe Philosopby

of History

ii,j

got caught in his wing;s with such violence that the angel can no [ong., ilose them. This storm irresistibly pro?els- him into -the futire to which his back is rurned, while the pile of debris before him grows skyward. This storm is what we call Progress.

x The themes which monastic discipline assigned to friars for meditation were designed to turn them away from the world and its afiairs. The thoughts which we are developing here originate from similar consideiations. At a momenr when the politicians in whom the opponents of Fascism had placed their hopes arc prostrate andionfirm their defeat by betraying their 9*l "'oj?' ihese observarions are intended to disentangle the political worldlings from the snares in which the traitors have entrapp..9..lt': Orir considerarion proceeds from the insight that the politiciarull stubborn faith in piogtess, their confidence in their "mass basiq" ,and, finally, theii servile integration in an uncontrollable ap paratus have been three aspects of the same thing. It_ seeks to an idea of the higti price our eccustomed thinking will "or.,.y pay for a conception of history that avoids anlr com' have io pliciry with the thinking to which these politicians continue to'
adhere.

German workers in secularized form. The Gotha progiletf,& ready bears traces of this confusion, defining labor as ,,[hr ;iltl of all wealth and all culrure." Smelling a rat, Marx coutl$L thar ". . . rhe man who posseses no othCr propery then hh LLCI povrer" must of necessirlr become ,,the slave of bther mcn uhD have made themselves the owners. . . .', However, the confidm spread, and soon thereafter Josef Dietzgen proclaimcd: ,,Thl savior of modern times is called work. The . . . improvemcflt . : r of labor constitutes the wealth which is now able-to accompUth \rhat no redeemer has ever been able to do.,, This vulgar-ptaixltt conception of the narure of labor bypasses the question of how iU products might benefit the workers while still not being at thcir
disposal.

It

recognizes only the progress in the mastery

'

XI

The conformism which has been part and parcel of Democracy from the beginning attaches not only to its poJiticC tactics bui to its economic views as well. It is one reason for iu later breakdown. Nothing has corrupted the German class so much as the notion that it was moving with the It regarded technological developments as the fall of the strcit with-which it thought it was moving. From there it was but step to the illusion that the factory work whifh was supposed t
tend toward technological progres constituted a political achicvl ment. The old Protestant ethics of work was resurrected

with naive complacency is contrasted-with the exploitation of the proletariat. Compared with this positivistic conciption, Fourier,s fantasies, which have so often been ridiculed, prore to be surprisingly sound. According to Fourier, as a resuit of efficient cooperative labor, four moons would illuminate the earthly night, the ice would recede from the poles, sea water would ,ro Ioriger taste selty, and bealts of prey would do man,s bidding. All t-his illustrates a kind of labor which, far from exploiting-narure, is capable of delivering her of rhe creations whiih Iie ?ormant in her. womb.as- potentials. Narure, which, as Dietzgen purs it, l':d* gratis," is a complement to the corrupted conception of
Iabor.
r The Gotha Congress of 1875 united the two German Socialist panies. one led by Ferdinand Lassalle, the other by Karl Marx and Witt Liebknecht.- T-hg pr-o-graT, drafted by Liebkirecht and Lassalle, was"trn severelv attacked bv Mam in London. sbe his "critique of the Gotha pro.
gram."

of sociery; it already displays ihe technocratic features later encountered in Fascism. Among these is e c-onc_eptiol of naftre which differs ominously from the one in the Socialist utopias before the 1848 revolution. The new conception of labor amounrs to the exploitation of nature, which
not the_ retrogression

if

naturc,

Illuminatbns

Tbeses on tbe Philosophy

of History

XII
We need history, but not the utay a spoiled loafer in tbe gardm of knouledge needs it,
-Netzsche, oF TIIE usr
AND ABUSE

or

HIsroRy

Not man or men but the suuggling, oppressed class itself is the depository of historical knowledge. In Marx it appears as thc last enslaved class, as the avenger that completes rhe task of liberetion in the name of generations of the downtrodden. This conviction, which had a brief resurgence .n the Spartacist group,r
to Social Democrats. Within three decades they managed virtually to erase the name of Blanqui, though it had been the rallying sound that had reverberated through the preceding century. Social Democracy thought fit to assign to the working class the role of the redeemer of future generations, in this way cutting the sinews of its greatest suength. This training made the working clas forget both its hatred and its spirit of sacrifice, for both are nourished by the image of enslaved ancestors rether than that of liberated grandchildren.
has always been objectionable

to criticism. However, when the chips are down, criticism must penerate beyond these predicates and focus on something thrt they have in common. The concept of the historical progrcss of mankind cennot be sundered from the concepr of is progresion through a homogeneous, empry time. A critique of thc conccpt of such a progression must be the basis of any criticism of th! concept of progress itself.

xIv
-Karl Kraus, wonrr rN wnsnr, Vol. I History is the subject of a structure whose site is not homogeneous, empty time, but time filled by the presence of ttre now lletztzeitl.* Thus, to Robespierre ancient Rome was e psst charged with the time of the now which he blasted out of thc continuum of history. The French Revolution viewed itsclf m Rome reincarnate. It evoked ancient Rome the way fashion evokes costumes of the pasr. Fashion has a flair for the topicel, no metter where it stirs in the thickets of long ago; it is a tiger's lcrp into the pest. This iump, however, tekes place in an arene whcri the ruling clas gives the commands. The same leap in the opcn air of history is the dialectical one, which is how Marx undcrstood the revolution.

Origin is the goal.

XIII
Eoery day our couse becomes clearer and people get snutrter,

edge). Secondly, it was something boundless, in keeping with the infinite perfectibility of mankind. Thirdly, progress was regarded as irresistible, something that automatically pursued a straight or spiral course. Each of these predicates is controversial and open
r Leftist group, founded by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg at the beginning .of World War I. in fpppsition to the pro-war policies of the German Socialist parry, later absorbed by the Communist party.
z6o

-Wilhelm Dietzgen, Dra ner,rcroN DEf, soZTALDEMoKRATTE Social Democratic theory, and even more its practice, have been formed by a con6eption of progress which did r.ot adhere to reality but made dogmatic claims. Progress as pictured in the minds of Social Democram was, first of all, the progress of mankind itself (and not iust advances in men's ability and knowl-

xv
The awareness that they are about to make the continuum of history explode is characteristic of the revolutionaqr classes at thc moment of their action. The great revolution introduced a ncw calendar. The initial day of a calendar seryes :rs a historical timc. lapse camera. And, basically, it is the same day that keeps rccurring in the guise of holidays, which are days of remembrancc. Thus the calendars do not mcasrue time as clocks do; they rro
r - Beniamin *ys "letztuif and indicarcs by the quotatioo marks thrt ho dpcs.nqt r.ryfly- mern- an equivalent to Gegenan*, ttrat is, prcsont. Hc clearly is thinking of the myst{cal rn no ttcrn.
zdt

Illutnirwtions

Tbeses

ot

the Pbilosophy of Hinory

rnonuments of a historical consciousness of which not the slightest trace has been apparent in Europe in the past hundred years. In the July revolution an incident occurred which showed this consciousness still alive. On the first evening of fighting it turned out that the clocks in towers were being fired on simultaneously and independently from several places in Paris. An eye-witness, who may have owed his insight to the rhyme, wrote as follows:

Qui le croirait! on dit, qu'imit6s contre l'heure

De nouveaux Josuds au pied de chaque tour, Tiraient sur les cadrans pour arr6ter le jour.+

A historical materialist approaches a historical subject only where he encounters it as a monad. In this structuro he recognizes the sign of a Mesianic cessation of happening, orr put differendy, a revolutionary chance in the fight for the op pressed past. He takes cognizance of it in order to blast a specific ere out of the homogeneous course of history-blasting a specific life out of the era or a specific work out of the lifework. As r result of this method the'lifework is preserved in this work and at the same time canceled t; in the lifework, the era; and in tho era, the entire course of history. The nourishing fruit of the historically understood contains time as a precious but tasteles secd.
lizes into a monad.

materialist cennot do without the notion of a present which is not a transidon, but in which time stands still and has come to a stop. For this notion defines the present in which he himself is writing history. Historicism gives the "eternal" image of the past; historical materialism supplies a unique experience with the past. The historical materialist leaves it to others to be drained by the whore called "Once upon a time" in historicism's bordello. He'remains in conuol of his powers, men enough to blast open the continuum of history.

xvr A historical

XVIII
"In relation to the history of organic life on eatthr" writes g modern biologist "the paltry fifty millennb of bonto sapiens con. stinrte something like two seconds at the close of a wenry-four. hour day. On this scale, the hirtoty of civilized mankind would fill one-fifth of the last second of the last hour." The prescnt, which, as a model of Messianic time, comprises the endre histoqy of mankind in an enormous abridgment, coincides exactly with the sarure which the history of mankind has in the universc.

XVII
Historicism rightly culminates in universal history. Materialistic historiography differs from it as to method more clearly than from eny other kind. Universal history has no theoretical arrneture. Its method is additive; it musters a mass of data to fill the homogeneous, empty time. Materialistic historiography, on the other hand, is based on a constructive principle. Thinking in volves not only the flow of thoughts, but their arrest as welL Where thinking suddenly stops in a configuration pregnant with tensionq it gives that confguration a shock, by which it crystal* Who would have believed

A)
Historicism contents iself with establishing a causal connoction berween various moments in history. But no fact that is r cause is for that very reason historical. It became historical post. humously, as it were, through events that may be separated from it by thousands of years. A historian who takes this as his point of departure stops telling the sequence of events like the beeds of a rosary. Instead, he grasps the constellation which his own era has formed with a definite earlier one. Thus he establishcs r conception of the present as the "time of the now" which is shot through with chips of Messianic time.
clevate, to cancel.

it! we are told that new Joshuas at the foot of every tower, as though irritated with time itself, fued at the dials in order to stop the day.
zdz

r The Hegelian term aafbeben in its threefold meaning: to pllscrycr to

26,

Ilhminatia*
B

ditor's Note

The soothsayers who found out from time what it had in store certainly did not experience time as either homogeneous or empry.Anyone who keeps this in mind will perhaps get an idea of how past times were experienced in remembrance-namely, in' just the seme way. We know that the Jews were prohibited frorn
investigating the furure. The Torah and the prayers instruct them in remembrancg however. This stripped the future of its magic, to which all those succumb who turn to the soothsayers for eil., lightenment. This does not imply, however, that for the Jews thc

Beniamin's work consists of nro books on German literotrrrc-hlt dissertation on "The Concept of Art Criticism in German Romrntl. cism" (Dar Begtifi der Kunstbitik in der deutsehen RomantihrBcg

rgzo) and "The Origin

of

deutscben Trauerspiels, Berlin" l9r8)--of boots of gcncrd tt. flections in the form of shon essays or aphorisms-,,One-Wey Str$ttt
(E_inbahnstrasse, Berlin, r9z8)

German Tragedy', (Der Ursyutrg dtt -two

future turned into homogeneous, empty time. For every second of time was the streit gate through which the Messiah might
enter.

(Berliner Kindbeit um Neunzebnbundert, written during tho lrf thirties and published posthumously, Frankfurg r95o)-and-of r grcrt number of literary and critical essays, book reviews, and comipn
taries.

and'A Berlin Childhood around rgootl

would have been ruined. The uanslation of the text follows the two-volume Germon cdl. tion of Benjamin's writings which, under the title Scbrtften, wrr cd. ltef 3d introduceg by Theodor W. Adomo and publishcd by thr Suhrkamp Verlag in rgSj. The tide of the present cbllection, brit not its content, is identical with the title of a sellction from thc Sohtlftm, published by Suhrkamp in 196r; Beniamin himself had approved thb tide for an earlier selection of some of his works. The Grmtn toxt is chiefy drawn from the published texts in various magaziner rnd newspapers. Professor Adorno poina out in his Introduction thrt lt is not definitive: in the few instances where the original manurcrlpE could be consulted, it turned out that Beniamin,s handwriting wu difficult to read, and as for the typescripts and printed rr"*rprftr or magazine copies, they 'hnquestionably conain numerous erioir." In the only case in which I was able to iompare the original mrnurcdp
264

The chief purpose of this collection is to convey the importrocr as a literary critic. It conains the fu[Jlngth essiyt wlth y9 ,"ry regrettable exceptions-the snrdy of ,.Goerhe,s Electlol Al. finities" (published in Hugo von Hofmannsdrd's Neze Dcuttohl Beitriige in two instalments, r9z4 and r9z5) and the articlc on,,Kul Kraus" (in the Fruzkfurter Zeitungr lg3r). Since Karl Kraus it tdll p_ractically unknown in English-speaking countries and sirtco thr Goethe consiss to a large extint of a polemic against Fricddch -essay Gundolf's Goetbe, equdly unknown, these- two essiys would hrvo needed so many explanatory notes that the thrust of thc tcxt i6Glf
of Benjamin

26t