Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In "Concerning Violence", the opening chapter to his definitive work The Wretched of the Earth, Frantz Fanon writes of a form of necessary, structural violence inherent to the cause of the oppressed releasing themselves from bonds that are established by this same violence. The native who decides to put the program into practice, and to become its moving force, is ready for violence at all times. From birth it is clear to him that this narrow world, strewn with prohibitions, can only be called in question by absolute violence. (Fanon 37). In doing so he draws a definitive line between the oppressor and the oppressed, suggesting that theirs are not worlds that can intermingle, but rather balance one another in polarity, their only exchange lying in opposition and perhaps eventually one replacing the other. The zone where the natives live is not complementary to the zone inhabited by the settlers. The two zones are opposed, but not in the service of a higher unity. Obedient to the rules of pure Aristotelian logic, they both follow the principle of reciprocal exclusivity. No conciliation is possible, for of the two terms, one is superfluous. (Fanon 38-39). It will be the purpose of this essay to analyse these claims alongside a reading of Duiker's Thirteen Cents, with the intention of showing that this Manichean model does not apply to the relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed in Duiker's Cape Town . Characters such as Gerald and Azure blur the lines between the two, and we will map Azure's journey towards self-recognition, and whether or not it is achieved through the same violence as Fanon's native. The first stumbling block towards the application of Fanon's theory to a text set in postcolonial, post-apartheid South Africa is the question of context. Fanon's "Concerning Violence" is a treatment on colonial power structures, particularly the relationship between the two antagonistic groups that Fanon dubs the settler and the native. Though South Africa is clearly no longer a colonized country at the time of Duiker's novel, the essence of Fanon's theory concerns systems of violence used to dehumanize and oppress others, and how these same tactics are essential to freeing oneself from this same oppression. The position of violence as a tool inherent in sustaining the status quo is established early on in the novel, perhaps most notably in Azure's vicious beating on Gerald's orders for his momentary
If Gerald and Azure's inability to fit neatly into either the category of the colonized or the colonizer somewhat distorts Fanon's view of the relationship, then how does his depiction of violence as integral to bucking the bonds of oppression fare alongside a reading of Thirteen Cents? We have already established that Gerald does indeed mirror the colonial power in suppressing the identities of those around him and delivering swift and crushing violence when opposed, and Azure's initial escape up the mountain culminates in a violent ritual that precedes Gerald's own death, though it is violence of a different kind. Whereas Fanon notes that "it is precisely at the moment he realizes his humanity that he begins to sharpen the weapons with which he will secure its victory" (Fanon 43), Azure's selfrecognition takes a different form, mainly in the realization that the social system into which he is trying to fit is warped, and the role assigned to him in it even more so. A boy? I'm not a boy. I've seen a woman being raped by policemen at night near the station. I've seen a white man let a boy Bafana's age get into his car. I've seen a couple drive over a street child and they still kept going. I've seen a woman give birth in Sea Point at the beach and throw it in the sea. A boy?