Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Project Scope
Describe Australian sustainability indices Can we replicate them here? Impact of Asset Valuation
Project Intent
Test another tool to communicate the magnitude of investment need Summarize asset management data into one financial index to be tracked over time Develop a leading indicator, as opposed to lagging indicators Illustrate the story of what happens if we continue on this path Do we leave a legacy or a liability for our children?
Louisiana Transportation Conference Feb. 18, 2013
3
Project Approach
Use existing state data Dont require any new data sets Pull data from standard agency documents, management system reports http://www.fhwa.dot.g ov/planning/processe s/statewide/practices/ asset_sustainability_i ndex/page00.cfm
Louisiana Transportation Conference Feb. 18, 2013
4
Budget/Need = Index
1.5
CSX
1
NSC
0.5
CN
2001 1 1 2002 1.16 0.92 2003 1.14 0.97 2004 1.11 1.4 1 2005 1.22 1.37 1.11 2006 1.76 1.58 1.21 2007 1.91 1.8 1.3 2008 1.87 2.09 1.33 2009 1.56 1.74 1.31 2010 1.96 1.97 1.48
0 CSX NSC CN
Bridge Budget GA Sustainabilty Ratio FC Sustainability Ratio WS Sustainability Ratio Paint Sustainabilty Ratio
Bridge Budget GA Sustainabilty Ratio FC Sustainability Ratio WS Sustainability Ratio Paint Sustainabilty Ratio
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 $175.00 $174.47 $174.40 $180.00 $185.00 $190.00 $196.00 $201.88 $141.00 0.80 0.85 0.860 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.99 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $170.41 $185.00 $193.00 $204.89 $211.00 $224.00 $235.00 $247.00 $259.00 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
2006 $141.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.03 2016 $272.00 1.02 0.99 1.01 1.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Statewide
98.5% 98.9% 96.6% 86.7% 95.8% 99.5% 97.3% 98.7% 98.2% 99.5% 97.9% 85.1% 95.1%
98.6% 98.6% 96.5% 82.3% 96.0% 99.4% 97.1% 98.4% 98.2% 98.5% 97.2% 84.4% 94.3%
99.0% 97.5% 95.7% 81.0% 98.1% 99.3% 96.6% 97.3% 98.2% 96.3% 97.0% 83.9% 93.7%
98.5% 97.4% 96.0% 78.2% 98.6% 99.2% 96.9% 97.6% 98.1% 97.6% 96.4% 90.7% 94.2%
98.6% 97.2% 96.1% 79.6% 98.4% 99.4% 97.2% 97.4% 98.2% 97.4% 96.6% 92.0% 94.5%
99.2% 96.4% 96.1% 80.4% 98.5% 99.5% 97.3% 97.6% 98.4% 98.4% 96.5% 91.6% 94.7%
99.4% 96.4% 96.2% 82.0% 98.8% 99.6% 97.3% 96.6% 98.4% 97.9% 98.2% 93.4% 95.1%
99.4% 96.2% 96.4% 82.5% 99.0% 99.7% 97.1% 96.7% 98.4% 98.4% 97.7% 93.9% 95.3%
99.8% 96.4% 96.4% 89.7% 98.9% 99.7% 97.0% 97.0% 97.9% 97.6% 97.7% 94.4% 96.3%
99.8% 96.9% 96.5% 90.7% 99.0% 99.6% 97.2% 96.8% 97.1% 97.7% 97.5% 94.6% 96.5%
99.8% 96.9% 96.3% 92.3% 98.5% 98.9% 97.3% 97.4% 97.0% 98.3% 97.3% 94.9% 96.7%
99.8% 96.6% 96.7% 92.5% 98.4% 99.0% 96.7% 97.8% 97.8% 99.1% 97.2% 96.0% 96.9%
99.1% 96.8% 97.4% 93.6% 98.6% 98.6% 97.1% 98.1% 97.6% 99.2% 97.3% 96.3% 97.2%
99.8% 95.6% 97.9% 94.9% 97.1% 98.3% 97.8% 98.7% 97.6% 99.3% 96.0% 96.4% 97.3%
Statewide Average 82 88 84 47 62 82 94 68 42 77 82 82 87 71 92
85 85 85 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 85 80 95
85 NA NA NA
81 89 96 NA NA 80 91 91
80 80 80 80 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 80 95
79 86 71 50 60 82 95 43 40 75 84 81 86 74 93
75 75 75 75 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 95
84 88 84 33 65 81 94
69
42 81
81
86 84 95
82 89 56 88
Other
ASI by Program
Conclusions
Data exist to produce financial sustainability metrics They can add to the public discourse of intergenerational equity and legacy They can illustrate the future consequences of current actions