Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

Police and the Pseudo-Democracy

Dan Costachescu Political Parties and Elections Federal elections in Canada are a competitive and open process. Political parties are free to set platforms within constitutional limits, can advertise them in the media, and hold meetings with voters to explain their objectives. On election day, citizens can freely vote for the candidate they think will best represent them in the House of Commons. Overall, it is an efficient and fair process - at least that is my perception. Similar systems exist in all the other Western democracies: the United States, the European Union countries, Switzerland, Norway, and a couple of smaller countries in Western Europe. They appear to be the golden standard for elements essential to democracy such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, civil liberties, human rights, etc. But why is this system called 'democracy'? The term has a Greek origin, 'demos' (Masses) and 'kratia' (Rule). The Rule of the Masses is assumed to function through representatives, politicians elected to make decisions in the name of their constituents. Is the Rule of the Masses working as expected? As it is now, I think it has a major design flaw. Accountability We want people in power to be accountable and that works reasonably well for politicians. A budget needs to be openly discussed and approved each year for various levels of government. Auditing is done throughout the year, to make sure money is spent as planned. The press is constantly digging, looking for conflicts of interest, favouritism, and, of course, crime. All sort of documents are scrutinized, including lunch and transportation receipts, if they are paid with public money. But even with all that big accountability machine working full time, we still have political scandals. No matter how much auditing is done, it is never enough to completely eradicate bad behaviour in politics. Money mismanagement, fraud, spying on other parties, have happened and will certainly happen again. But all in all, I would say the accountability of the political system looks more or less OK. There is however in the Western democracies a powerful entity that provides almost zero accountability, and that is the Police. I am using the Police as a

loose term, to include federal/provincial/city police forces, spy services, national security agencies, and the like organizations. If we compare headcounts, Police employees vs. elected politicians, the ratio is at least 10 to 1. They have a very loose mandate ('keep us safe'), get huge amounts of public money, and nobody can check what they are doing. We know that Police officers engage on a daily basis in activities such as surveillance (many kinds), running front companies, bargaining with criminals, interacting with informers. They also have the power to arrest people and seize goods. And all that without any external auditing. On top of that, the Police culture imposes a code of silence that prevents officers to report or question dubious actions of their colleagues (they are not supposed to 'rat' on their fellow officers). This secretive environment where Police operates is a perfect ground for crime. I am alleging that criminal activity is happening on a large scale here, and that Police houses the biggest criminal organization in the country. Policing Models Everybody knows how the evil Gestapo police used to operate. A black car stops in the middle of the night at a house, four officers arrest Hans and Helga, and no one hears about their fate for months. Then Hans and Helga are tortured, forced to confess imaginary crimes, and sentenced to many years in prison. These days we don't hear about such actions in Canada, so we tend to assume that policing must be OK. But this only means the Police does not follow the Gestapo model. It may be even more criminal and active, it just works differently. Times have changed, and if the Canadian Police targets a particular individual, extracting a confession is no longer necessary. The Police may choose to 'disrupt' that individual, as opposed to charging him for a particular crime. This approach comes very handy if the individual didn't actually commit a crime. The justice system is not involved, and the 'disruption' is a Police internal affair that doesn't need to be explained to a third party. Getting a prison sentence is also unnecessary in a 'disruption' case. It is sufficient for example that the targeted individual becomes partially incapacitated, to the point that he only has enough energy to do the very basic survival activities: buying groceries, cooking, doing laundry. Police as a Criminal Organization To understand how the Police operates as criminal organization, we need to look

first at their objectives. What the Police simply wants is (1) prosperity for its members and (2) control over the rest of the population. This is hardly original, as every dictatorship have sought basically the same objectives since the beginning of time. What is new however is the stealth implementation of the process to achieve those aims. History tells us that all repressive regimes have used body harm as a main tool of controlling the population. Opponents were killed in some cases, tortured in others, or were simply intimidated by the prospect of death and/or pain. The Police is no different in this regard, they still kill and harm individuals in a covert (and criminal) way. What's new is the way they carry those actions. The main tool they use now to kill or harm are medical conditions, induced using technology. More on that later. Who are the opponents of the Police? Well, anyone perceived as a threat by them. It could be a senior member of a political party who lobbies for more police accountability. It may be a rich celebrity that refuses to donate to charity. Or a judge that does not accept at face value everything the police says. It could also be a skilled bureaucrat that competes for a government position that the Police wants to control. Last, but not least, it could be a non-police criminal. Criminals unrelated to Police are competitors of the Police and they are also considered as threats. All of the above are candidates for 'disruption'. Who is in charge of Police as a criminal organization? Obviously the Criminal Police has a different command structure than the one visible from outside. Since the Police has the ultimate power in the country, its management cannot be dismissed by politicians. It is fair to assume that the Criminal Police is managed by a group of senior officers, as opposed to a single individual, for maximum flexibility. Official Police chiefs are just fronts, playing a specific role for the public and negotiating budgets with the politicians. What are the resources of the Criminal Police? There are three major types of resources that help the Police rule: front companies, agents and technology. Front Companies Contrary to the public perception of how front companies work - pretending something and doing something else - companies controlled by the Police do most of the time exactly what they claim to do. For this reason, they blend-in well, and are hard to figure out. Here is a list of the major type of companies and charities that are of interest for the Police: a. Charities and fund-raising companies. These two types work in tandem and provide the largest amount of black money to the Police. If an entity controls a

charity, it then decides which companies get the fund-raising business from the charity. Controlling those fund-raising companies closes the loop and syphons significant amounts of money from the donations that reach the charity. It is hard again to put numbers on the percentage of charities that are Police fronts, so I'll assume a 50% ratio. Considering also that an average 50% of donations is spent on fund-raising, at least 10 to 15 cents will go to Police as black money for every dollar donated to charity nationwide. b. Rental and Condo Buildings. The Police invests in real estate a significant portion of the black money it collects from charities. A large portfolio of houses is also maintained using front owners. c. Property Management companies. This type of companies do not need a lot of capital to setup, and have a key for every door of the properties they manage. Through PM companies the Police gets access to all apartments and business premises where it has an interest to do something. An added bonus is the control of the renovation business where Police agents working as contractors get most of the renovation orders. d. Security companies. Security is big business, and security companies provide the same access advantage as the Property Management companies. e. Chemical labs. Access to various chemicals used for criminal purposes can be easily hidden by controlling commercial labs. Test results of water samples and food samples can also be manipulated if needed. f. Healthcare labs. Control of those labs allows tampering with the medical test data of the individuals targeted by the Police. g. Food outlets, including corporate cafeterias. If Fred is targeted by the Police, they want to be the one to sell him the daily hamburger or salad. h. Internet and Network Infrastructure companies. This is an easy way to get access to corporate data, such as e-mails, databases, and technology data. Insider information harvested from private corporate networks can be used to get trading profits and is virtually impossible to be correlated with the infrastructure companies. Stolen technology data can be used for the Police needs and is also very difficult to trace (who can investigate Police?). i. High Tech hardware companies. Fields of interest are telecommunications, wireless technologies, lasers, x-ray equipment, military hardware. Police needs facilities to produce surveillance and various disruption hardware for its own use. The Police also has a significant number of agents in hotels, restaurants, and grocery stores, without necessarily owning the whole company.

Agents The Police needs large numbers of non-police individuals to achieve their goals. The majority of their agents work in the front companies. Most of them will never be asked to go out at night and kill someone. Rather, they will just have to change some test numbers if they work in a lab, or provide access if they do property management. Agents are recruited from regular work environments as well: government, banks, hotels, airlines, etc. Some of them do not realize that they help organized crime. It is very easy to approach a potential agent when wearing a police uniform, and concepts like 'patriotism', 'serving the country', 'national security' help convince many to enrol as agents and feel good about it. The Police is also in a good position to convince individuals with a criminal record to become agents. Employment options are usually limited for those individuals, and a job offer from a Police front company may be difficult to resist, even if it comes with strings attached. Technology Various technologies are used to harm the individuals targeted by Police, typically through medical conditions. From all medical conditions, cancer is the most effective way to disrupt an individual. Who has heard about a suspicious cancer being investigated? If it happens, it is a very rare event. And who would be doing such an investigation, should it happen? Police. So, they are quite safe to stay above suspicion. The perfect crime is one that nobody sees as a crime. Cancer is also very easy to be induced. There is a tremendous amount of medical studies on animals for all kinds of cancer, thoroughly documented so that they can be reproduced in other studies. Most follow this simple pattern: step 1: induce cancer using a chemical compound or radiation; step2: administer a proposed remedy to see if it slows or cures the disease. For the Police, only step 1 above is of interest, and they can apply the procedure to their target. How would it work, for example, to induce cancer to John, a successful CEO in his fifties, who is reluctant to donate a part of his personal wealth to charity? It may very well start with a fake positive PSA test result, from a health lab controlled by the Police. The next step may be a biopsy, in a facility controlled by the Police as well. They cannot wish more than to have the target sedated and willing to allow surgical access to a specific organ. At this point, cancer induction is attempted, either with radiation or with an appropriate chemical compound.

They may try for prostate cancer, or some other type of cancer, as this disease is so unpredictable. Let's say John gets the cancer. The condition is not necessarily fatal, at least in the short term. If John survives, it is very likely that he will start donating to a charity associated with cancer. If John doesn't survive, part of his inheritance will probably go to charity through his family. Either way, the Police collects its share of the money from the charity. In most cases, the Police disruption of individuals need not be fatal. It is sufficient that the targeted individual experiences significant reduction in energy level. A successful politician will no longer be that successful if he gets chronic fatigue. A judge may consider retirement if she repeatedly faints in court or develops severe depression. Again, medical studies on animals offer a variety of ways to induce diabetes, liver disease, arthritis, etc. Here is a list of other Police techniques for non-fatal disruption. They can be combined for maximum effectiveness: 1. Using electromagnetic radiation (e.g. microwave range). This technique is the most secret weapon of the Police. It leaves no trace in the targeted individuals, passes through walls (some frequencies) and can produce a wide range of physiological disruptions. A low-power version of EM radiation is currently used for wireless networking and cellular phones. The hardware used for EM radiation as a weapon is actually very simple. In the most basic setup it is just a radio transmitter, an antenna and a control board. Components for radio transmitters are widely available, as they are commercially used for network communications. The antenna may just be a dish similar to those used for satellite receivers. As for the control board, it does not need more computing power that a smartphone. There is absolutely no problem for the Police to assemble EM radiation hardware in large quantities without raising suspicions. High-power EM radiation would typically be used on targeted individuals while they are at home and asleep. The source of the radiation will be placed in the apartment below or above the targeted room. For houses, the source can also be placed in a car parked close to the house, or in an adjacent house or building. The Police can achieve a wide range of body disruptions using radiation: - radiation with a proper pulse and frequency can be used to contract groups of muscles. And muscles control vital processes in the body: heart beat, breathing, moving food through the digestive system, etc. Using radiation synchronized with the heart beat (like a pacemaker) can induce arrhythmia. Forcing contraction of blood vessels through radiation can raise blood pressure to dangerous levels.

And digestion can be disrupted in various ways by contracting the muscles of the digestive system. - body temperature can be increased. It works the same way as in a microwave oven. Even a small raise of one degree centigrade will trigger various metabolic circuit breakers in the body, and affect sleep, digestion, immune system and other functions. Let's look at an example. Say Brenda, targeted by the Police, goes to bed at 10pm. At that time, a Police agent remotely starts radiation that raises Brenda's body temperature by a small amount. She starts sweating, and is unable to fall asleep for an hour. Between 11pm and 12am radiation is stopped, and sleep finally comes. From 12am to 4am, the Police agent uses radiation with a specific frequency and pulse that raises Brenda's blood pressure by a significant amount. Her heart will work hard for four hours, and will not be able get the normal recovery and repair that happens during normal sleep. Radiation is stopped at 4am, Brenda sleeps two more hours and wakes up at 6am really tired. In this typical example, radiation is very efficient in inducing fatigue without providing any indication to the target about the cause of the fatigue. The sleep lasted seven hours, normally enough to recover and get energy for the next day. So Brenda will blame hormones, ageing, maybe an argument at the office, but will never suspect that her fatigue was caused by exposure to radiation. 2. Using medication. This is one of the easiest way to harm individuals, and I am alleging that it is widely used by the Police. The secret here is that Police uses medication on healthy individuals. Knowing their side effects and cross interactions, drugs can be customized for a particular individual to produce negative effects. What kind of medication does the Police use for disruption? Here is a short list: a. Arthritis medication. Some anti-arthritis drugs are blood thinners, they reduce the ability of the blood to coagulate and, as a result, may cause internal bleeding. That is exactly what the Police would want for disruption purposes, and the effect may be enhanced by adding additional chemicals that irritate the digestive tract. b. Tylenol. Tylenol is particularly toxic to the liver, without showing any visible signs of intoxication. If Susan doesn't have a headache or joint pain then the only effect of Tylenol used long term will be liver damage. c. Antacids. Reducing stomach acid impacts the absorption of vital nutrients such as calcium and disrupts various digestion processes that depend on stomach acid. Appetite is reduced as well. d. Stimulant medication used in the evening. If Joe likes to drink a beer every

evening, a stimulant dissolved in his beer will disrupt his sleep. And he will likely blame the beer. e. Sedatives used in the morning. Those will obviously cause the targeted individuals to be tired and sleepy during the day. f. Cholesterol lowering medication. Cholesterol is an essential component of cell membranes in the body and a raw material for the production of steroid hormones. The digestion of fats cannot happen without cholesterol. It is a very bad idea to lower the cholesterol level without a good medical reason, but it works very well as a disruption tool. Cholesterol that is too low is correlated with depression, some cancers, fatigue, etc. And in any case the liver must work harder to manage the cholesterol levels. g. Hormone based medication. Hormone supplementation for healthy people will cause various negative effects: weight gain, weight loss, rise of blood pressure, difficulty to sleep, etc. Estrogen, testosterone and thyroid hormones are the most common hormones used for disruption. The Police has many ways to arrange delivery of a medication to a targeted individual: - Using tap water. Police controls many Property Management companies; with a simple plumbing job Bob's apartment tap water will get medication dissolved in it. This will only work with chemicals that are colourless and tasteless. - Police agents can enter Bob's apartment while he is away, and add the medication to food in his refrigerator. - Police can also use food companies it controls to package food that looks regular, but contains medication. So Bob's favourite sardines may very well be 'fortified' with one or more enzyme inhibitors. - Finally, Bob might get a prescription to take unnecessary medication. Police controls many health labs; they can produce false test numbers and Bob's doctor may prescribe medication to bring the test numbers in the normal range. 3. Nutrient deprivation and/or overdose. Here, the basic recipe is very simple: replace foods with similar looking ones that are nutritionally inferior, toxic, or both. For example, table salt can be mixed with white toxic additives. Fish and meat can be treated with solvents in order to remove valuable fats like omega-3. Vitamin A has a relatively tight safety range. A high dose causes liver toxicity, headaches and other negative effects. Vitamin D is also toxic in high amounts. Both vitamins are fat soluble. Police can just dissolve them in butter or vegetable oil and deliver them to their target.

Some nutrient deficiencies lead to severe symptoms. Vitamin B1 for example is found in small amounts in foods and can be easily destroyed. Insufficient vitamin B1 leads to fatigue, heart failure and mental symptoms. Again, Police can tamper with food, remove the vitamin, then deliver to the individual they want to harm. As a support technique for nutrient deprivation, the Police can create the appearance of food intolerances in order to reduce the food choices of a targeted individual. If Bonnie gets a headache every time she eats dairy products, she will stop eating them. And a headache can be easily induced with radiation. Similarly, Police can tamper with seafood that George occasionally has in its fridge, and add an irritant chemical to them. George will get heartburn, will associate it with seafood, and will, of course, remove seafood from his menu. 4. Using household and industrial chemicals. The Police can deliver these in food, beverages, as well as through air conditioning systems. If the targeted individual lives in an air-conditioned apartment for example, the A/C system can be modified to spray dust containing dangerous flame retardants, BPA, pesticides, etc. Tap water can be delivered mixed with toxic levels of fluoride, many times higher than the level of regular fluoridation. The idea is to induce chronic fatigue by overloading the liver with toxins on a permanent basis. Conclusion The public election of members of Parliament, executive leaders, mayors, etc. is obviously a beneficial procedure. Those are specialized jobs that carry a lot of responsibility, and due process is necessary to make sure the right candidate gets the job. The public needs to realize however that elected politicians do not hold the ultimate power in the country. The Prime Minister can decide if the sales tax is 5% or 6%. The mayor of a big city can decide to outsource garbage collection. None of those decisions, while important, can hurt individuals as much as a Police decision to 'disrupt' people. A tax increase can be detrimental to Bill. But a Police decision to induce cancer to Peter can be fatal. This is the design flaw of Canada's democracy, as well as of the other Western democracies. Canada is in fact a Police state, where elected politicians manage the economics and international affairs, while Police exercises the absolute power over unsuspecting citizens.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi