Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 20

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031

Contents
1. Why MPLS? 2. MPLS elements and terms 3. Basic architecture of an LSR MPLS node 4. Basic architecture of an LER MPLS (MPLS edge node) 5. MPLS operation label switching 6. MPLS label stacking 7. IP routing versus MPLS switching 8. MPLS header position 9. MPLS label distribution 10. Penultimate hop popping PHP 11. MPLS applications

indigoo.com

IP

MPLS

MPLS

MPLS

IP

Peter R. Egli 2013

1 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


1. Why MPLS (1/2)?

indigoo.com

Why not ATM? ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) as a backbone transmission technology has a scalability problen. ATM is connection-oriented: Between any pair of switches / routers a separate PVC (Permanent Virtual Connection) must be set up. If optimal routing is required a full mesh of PVCs needs to be established (O(n^2) complexity). In large networks this becomes unfeasible.

ATM does not have powerful routing protocols:


ATM does not provide such powerful routing protocols as IP (OSPF, BGP).

ATM is dying:
ATM is slowly but steadily being replaced by other, simpler technologies. Why not simple IP routing? QoS is difficult to meet with traditional routers: Traditional routers have become the bottleneck in the backbone.

Routing is costly:
Routing is costly ($) since it needs a lot of performance and memory. (@ 2007 ca. 200000 BGP routes in Internet backbone; requires 60-120Mb memory to hold these routes.)
Peter R. Egli 2013 2 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


1. Why MPLS (2/2)?

indigoo.com

MPLS combines the advantages of layer 3 routing with layer 2 packet forwarding (in hardware).

+ + + +

Routing in MPLS is done with IP routing protocols. No change to the existing Internet backbone routing infrastructure is required (AS/BGP4 for Internet backbone, OSPF for private or enterprise backbone routing). QoS (Quality of Service) is achieved through layer 2 switching. The routing tables size can be reduced through layer 2 switching.

MPLS allows to add additional services like VPN.

Peter R. Egli 2013

3 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


2. MPLS elements and terms (1/3):

indigoo.com

LSR: Label Switching Router. Core MPLS router/switch that switches packets based on label.
LER: Label Edge Router; same as edge-LSR; a LER sits at the edge of a network and performs label push/pop = label imposition/disposition. LSP: Label Switched Path (is unidirectional). Path that an IP packet takes.

Ingress LSR: The ingress LSR is an LER an as such the first MPLS hop in an LSP. The ingress LSR performs the transition from IP routing and packet forwarding to MPLS switching (IP to MPLS).
Egress LSR: The egress LSR is an LER as well and does the opposite operation of an ingress LSR. The egress LSR terminates the MPLS LSP and performs the transition from MPLS switching to IP routing and packet forwarding (MPLS to IP). Label swapping: Ingress to egress label exchange (like ATM VPI/VCI).
Peter R. Egli 2013 4 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


2. MPLS elements and terms (2/3):

indigoo.com

FEC: Forwarding Equivalent Class. Set of packets that belong to the same forwarding treatment.
PHP: Penultimate Hop Popping. The penultimate LSR removes (pops) the MPLS label and forwards the IP packet to reduce MPLS processing overhead. LIB: Label Information Base (Label to IP prefix binding table). The LIB contains the label bindings (mappings) for every route prefix received via BGP. FIB: Forwarding Information Base (routing table), used in the ingress-LSR. The FIB is actually the same as the IP routing table but augmented with MPLS information to allow a decision about the forwarding method (forward incoming IP packet as a pure IP packet or label it and send it into an MPLS LSP). LFIB: Label Forwarding Information Base. The LFIB contains the mappings that are actually used by the label switching engine. It contains a subset of the label bindings of the LIB.

Peter R. Egli 2013

5 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


2. MPLS elements and terms (3/3):
Label binding: The label binding is the mapping of an IP prefix (FEC) to a label.
Label imposition: Label imposition is the same as label pushing.

indigoo.com

Peter R. Egli 2013

6 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


3. Basic architecture of an LSR MPLS node:

indigoo.com

MPLS consists of a Forwarding (data plane) and a Control (control plane) part. The control plane runs an ordinary IP routing stack with routing protocols. Additionally the control plane runs a label binding (label to IP prefix) exchange protocol with other routers (LDP and others). The data plane receives labeled packets, looks up the label to ascertain the outgoing interface and label (label swapping). Control plane
IP routing protocol (OSPF, BGP) Routing information exchange with other routers

L1: Label 1 L2: Label 2

IP routing table Label binding exchange with other routers Outgoing labeled packet IP2
L2

MPLS IP routing protocol (LDP)


Incoming labeled packet IP2
L1

Data plane Label forwarding table (LFIB)

Peter R. Egli 2013

7 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


4. Basic architecture of an LER MPLS (MPLS edge node):

indigoo.com

An edge-LSR (LER) augments the general MPLS node architecture with an MPLS-enabled IP forwarding table (FIB) that allows desicion routing/switching on incoming IP packets.
Control plane 1) Label removal and subsequent L3 route lookup. 2) The LIB contains all prefix to label mappings received by this LSR. 2) IP routing protocol (OSPF, BGP) Routing information exchange with other routers (BGP4)

IP routing table

LIB

MPLS IP routing protocol (LDP)

Label binding exchange with other routers (LDP) Data plane

Incoming IP packets

IP forwarding table (FIB) 1)

Outgoing IP packets Outgoing labeled packets


8 Rev. 1.30

Incoming labeled packet


Peter R. Egli 2013

Label forwarding table (LFIB)

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


5. MPLS operation label switching (1/2):

indigoo.com

1. The ingress LSR receives the IP packet with Dest.=192.168.2.2, classifies it into an FEC and labels it with a label according to the FEC (L1). The FEC corresponds to a traditional destination subnet. 2. The core LSRs receive the packet, use the ingress label as an index into a lookup table and thus ascertains the egress label and interface on which to forward the packet (label swapping and switching). 3. The egress LSR receives the packet, removes the label and performs a traditional layer 3 routing lookup to forward the packet to the final destination.
IP forwarding Label switching IP forwarding

Ingress LSR (LER) LSR Label Switched Routers


IP D=192.168.2.2 IP D=192.168.2.2

Egress LSR (LER) LSP Label Switched Path


IP D=192.168.2.2

192.168.2.2

L1

IP D=192.168.2.2

L2

IP D=192.168.2.2

L3

MPLS headers
Peter R. Egli 2013 9 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


5. MPLS operation label switching (2/2):

indigoo.com

Multiple streams of IP traffic (IP prefixes) can be mapped onto the same path (LSP). E.g. both IP1 and IP2 in the example below are mapped into the same FEC (Forwarding Equivalent Class). The assignment of label (path) can be done based on VPN identifiers or QoS.

IP1

Ingress LSR (LER) LSR Label Switched Routers

Egress LSR (LER) IP2

IP1

IP1 IP2

L1 L1

IP1 IP2

L2 L2

IP1 IP2

L3 L3

IP1

IP2

IP2

Peter R. Egli 2013

10 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


6. MPLS label stacking:

indigoo.com

Labels can be stacked for specific purposes, e.g. VPNs. The switching in the MPLS core uses only the outermost label. In case of VPNs the inner label is used for destination lookup in the egress LSR. Usually only 2 labels are stacked (inner label for VPN, outer label for path). Label stacking is used by RFC2547bis (MPLS based VPNs with BGP4).

1. Ingress LSR performs route lookup to ascertain FEC. The IP packet belongs to a VPN (VPN membership of route prefixes along with label are exchanged with BGP in core). 2. Core LSR switch the packet downstream and exchange the outer label. 3. The egress LSR pops the outer label, performs a label lookup which tells it to pop the outer label. Then the egress LSR looks up the inner label that tells the LSR to which VPN the packet belongs. The egress LSR pops the inner label and performs a route lookup in the VPNs routing table. Eventually the egress LSR forwards the packet towards the destination.
Ingress LSR Core LSR 1 Core LSR 2 Egress LSR

1. IP IP 73 30 IP

2. 73 28 IP

2. 73 16

3. IP

Peter R. Egli 2013

11 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


7. IP routing versus MPLS switching (1/4):
Comparison of headers:
IP header
Ver. ID TTL Protocol IHL TOS u Total length DF MF Fragment offset

indigoo.com

MPLS Header
Label (20 bit) EXP S TTL (8 bit)

Header checksum

Source address Destination address Optional options

Label: Address EXP: EXPerimental or EXPedite bits S: If set to 1 indicates bottom of label stack in case of label stacking. TTL: Time To Live (max. number of MPLS hops, like IP TTL) for loop detection.

Routing (packet forwarding) means: 1. Decrement TTL by 1; drop packet if TTL=0 2. Route lookup (packet leaves router through which interface?) 3. (Optional) Fragment packet if too big for outbound interface 4. Recalculate header checksum 5. Apply QoS (change TOS/DSCP value, put packet into priority queue)

Switching a packet with MPLS means: 1. Lookup of outbound interface with MPLS label; outbound LSPs label is looked up in the same step. Copy outbound label into label field in header. 2. Decrement TTL by 1 3. Apply QoS (queueing of MPLS packet).

The MPLS address is only 20 bits which represents an address space of 1 million entries. This reduces memory demands and allows using the label as a direct index into a lookup table. The MPLS address does not have prefixes (masks). This allows using the label as a direct index into a lookup table. MPLS switching does not involve costly processing such as header checksum calculation.
Peter R. Egli 2013 12 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


7. IP routing versus MPLS switching (2/4):

indigoo.com

Why IP route lookups are costly: Route lookups = Find the longest matching prefix among all prefixes that match the destination address. Both 128.9.16.0/21 and 128.9.0.0/16 in the example below match the destination IP address 128.9.16.14 but the former is more specific (longer prefix) and thus is the correct routing entry. The job of the router is to find this longest prefix matching route entry among possibly many other matching (but less specific) route entries.
IPv6 still has prefixes (to allow route aggregation) but unlike IPv4 the address space is gigantic and can be partitioned more freely and thus allows easier aggregation.
Longest matching prefix Matching prefix but not longest prefix 128.9.176.0/24 128.9.16.0/21 65.0.0.0/8 128.9.172.0/21 142.12.0.0/19 IP prefix covering a range in the entire possible IP address range.

128.9.0.0/16

IP address range

0
Peter R. Egli 2013

128.9.16.14

232-1
13 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


7. IP routing versus MPLS switching (3/4):

indigoo.com

Patricia trie (tree with internal and external (=leaf) nodes) (1): The PATRICIA trie (Practical Algorithm to Retrieve Information Coded in Alphanumeric) is one of many route lookup algorithms (e.g. used in BSD kernel). A. Build up of trie: 1. Generally the PATRICIA trie contains the prefixes as nodes. 0 bit in address prefix results in a node to the left of the current node, 1 bits result in a node to the right of the current node. 2. If there is only 1 child node it is removed (path compression). The remaining parent node stores the number of bits that were compressed and thus can be skipped. This reduces the number of necessary comparisons. B. Search algorithm: The router proceeds bit by bit of the destination IP address through the tree (decision left or right child node). The router skips the specified number of bits as indicated in the nodes. The PATRICIA trie does not allow to find an exact match but only a possible match. Therefore the router must perform a full match in the leaf node (after masking the input IP address with the number of bits that lead to this leaf node). If the destination IP matches the full prefix that the leaf node contains the route lookup is successful and the router finds the outgoing interface and next-hop-gw in the leaf node. If not the router must go up the trie (towards the root) and do a mask/full match operation in each node until there is a match. If none of the nodes match the root node will (if configured so) contain the default route. If no default route is configured the route lookup has failed.
It is evident that the maintenance of the PATRICIA trie (add routes / nodes, remove routes / nodes based on routing protocol like OSPF, BGP) and the lookup are costly in terms of processing power (N.B.: The lookup is done anew per IP packet).
14 Rev. 1.30

Peter R. Egli 2013

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


7. IP routing versus MPLS switching (4/4):
Patricia trie (tree with internal and external (=leaf) nodes) (2):
Example Prefixes: a) 00001 b) 00010 c) 00011 d) 001 e) 0101 f) 011 g) 100 h) 1010 I) 1100 j) 11110000 k) 000101 j Skip 5 h e a b c i

indigoo.com

Prefix length

f d

1. IP address 20.9.4.2 Node k matches best. Route in node k is taken. 00010100. 2. IP address 31.9.4.2 Node c matches best. Route in node c is taken. 00011111. 3. IP address 18.9.4.2 Node b matches best. Route in node b is taken. 00010010.
15 Rev. 1.30

Peter R. Egli 2013

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


8. MPLS header position:
Where is the MPLS header (label)?

indigoo.com

MPLS, unlike other protocols, is inserted between existing layer 2 and layer 3 header (shim header):
Payload IP L2 L1 Payload IP L2 L1 MPLS

MPLS label encapsulation with different layer 2 protocols: PoS (Packet over SONET): Payload IP MPLS PPP Ethernet: Frame Relay: Label over ATM PVCs: (subsequent cell) ATM label switching:
Payload Payload Payload Payload IP IP IP MPLS MAC MPLS MPLS FR ATM ATM HEC CLP

SDH Phy Phy Phy Phy PTI VCI VPI GFC

Payload IP

Label

(subsequent cell)

Payload

HEC

CLP

PTI

VCI

VPI

GFC

Label
Peter R. Egli 2013 16 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


9. MPLS label distribution (1/2):

indigoo.com

LDP Label Distribution Protocol: Label distribution propagates upstream from destination to source. In this way a LSP is already established when the last label binding hits the edge-LSR (source of IP packet).
1. LDP hello packets are used to discover neighbors on links. LDP hello packets use IP broadcast or IP multicast and UDP. 2. After the discovery the LDP neighbors establish an LDP session through a TCP connection (like BGP). 3. Every Edge-LSR creates IP prefix label bindings for the network it is attached to and distributes these bindings via LDP to its upstream neighbors (into the MPLS cloud). 4. The neighbors fill their LIB with the LDP bindings received from both upstream and downstream LDP neighbors (LIB contains mapping IP/FEClabel). 5. The LSRs distribute all their label bindings to their adjacent LSRs (both upstream and downstream). 6. The LSRs fill their LFIB only with label bindings that were received from a downstream neighbor.

LIB: 17.0.0.0/32 LFIB: LER1 32push 17.0.0.0 For 17.0.0.0 use label 32 LSR2

LIB: 17.0.0.0/44 LFIB: 3244 LER3

LIB: 17.0.0.0/44 LFIB: 44pop 17.0.0.0 17.0.0.0 network

For 17.0.0.0 use label 44

Unsolicited label distribution in upstream direction.


Peter R. Egli 2013 17 Rev. 1.30

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


9. MPLS label distribution (2/2):

indigoo.com

LDP parameters: 1. Unsolicited vs. on-demand distribution: Unsolicited: Label is distributed even if upstream LSR does not need prefix/label mapping. 2. Independent vs. ordered control: Independent control allocation: Assignment of label to a new IP prefix (received via BGP) regardless of whether the router has already received a label mapping for the same route prefix from the downstream LSR. Ordered control allocation: Assignment of label only for prefixes where a downstream label already exists in LIB. 3. Liberal retention vs. conservative retention: Conservative retention: An LSR only inserts label bindings into its LIB that are received from its current IP next hop gateway for this prefix. Liberal retention: An LSR retains also label bindings that were not received from the current next hop gateway for that specific prefix.
The combinations unsolicited distribution/independent control/liberal retention are used to provide faster convergence in case of a link failure:
LDP: For 17.0.0.1 use label 12 LDP: For 17.0.0.1 use label 28

Before link failure: LIB: 17.0.0.0/28 17.0.0.0/32 LFIB: 1228

After link failure: LIB: 17.0.0.0/28 17.0.0.0/32 LFIB: 1232


18 Rev. 1.30

Peter R. Egli 2013

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


10. Penultimate hop popping PHP:

indigoo.com

Without PHP the egress LSR performs the following steps on a received packet: 1. Inspect MPLS header and look up label. The lookup tells the LSR to pop the label (1st lookup). 2. Inspect IP packet and perform layer 3 (routing) lookup (2nd lookup). 3. Forward IP packet to destination. The 2 lookups (MPLS and IP) present additional load on the egress edge-LSR. The MPLS label lookup can be removed without changing the MPLS logic. Thus the edge-LSR can request the upstream MPLS neighbor by sending a special LDP label (called implicit null-label, value 3). The penultimate LSR then pops the label and sends a pure IP packet to the egress-LSR.
LIB: 17.0.0.0/32 LFIB: 32push LIB: 17.0.0.0/32 LFIB: 3244 LIB: 17.0.0.0/44 LFIB: 44pop LIB: 17.0.0.0/3 LFIB: -

Ingress LSR (LER) LSR Label Switched Routers


IP 17.0.0.1 IP 17.0.0.1 IP 17.0.0.1

Egress LSR (LER)


IP D=17.0.0.1

17.0.0.1

32

IP 17.0.0.1

44 LDP: For 17.0.0.1 use label 3


19 Rev. 1.30

LDP: For 17.0.0.1 use label L1


Peter R. Egli 2013

LDP: For 17.0.0.1 use label L2

MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching RFC3031


11. MPLS applications:
1. Backbone routing (switching, service provider network): Reduction of routes on backbone routers (lower memory demands). Faster routing (switching instead of routing).
2. Layer 3 VPNs (e.g. RFC2547bis):
OSPF, RIP, static routes BGP4 for VPN route distribution LDP for label distribution OSPF, RIP, static routes

indigoo.com

Company 1 (branch) 10.0/16

Edge-LSR

Edge-LSR

Company 1 (branch) 10.1/16

Edge-LSR Company 2 (branch) 10.0/16

Provider MPLS core

Edge-LSR Company 2 (branch) 10.1/16

3. QoS for IP-based networks: Assign IP packets to different traffic classes (FEC) based on different criteria (destination address, payload type (voice), TOS/DSCP bits etc.) and then prioritize packets. N.B.: MPLS per se does not provide QoS. MPLS is only a means to assign packets to classes and switch these classes differently.
Peter R. Egli 2013 20 Rev. 1.30

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi