Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
the records and other evidences present a true and fair picture of whatever they are supposed to reflect. Audits can be categorized basically into two types- Financial audit and nonfinancial audit. Financial audit is a statutory audit that helps in monitoring the financial performance of the company. Non-financial audit is non-statutory and serves two purposes. Firstly, it checks a companys compliance to standards and secondly, determines whether a product or service satisfies customers' demands in terms of features and quality Though financial and non-financial audits differ greatly, there are some similarities, too. Both the audits are conducted to measure compliance to a set of standards. Both generate performance data that can be used for benchmarking and performance analysis and both identify opportunities for performance improvement.
BENEFITS OF AUDIT
Audit yields multiple benefits. Some of these benefits are the following:
Reality Check
Companies prepare formal plans before executing them, but in many cases these plans do not get executed as supposed because the assumptions made by the executives may not have been correct. Systematic collection of data and comparing reality with manager's assumption help companies to be more resilient when faced with change.
Enhances Teamwork
Systematic collection and sharing of audit information enhances the ability of the various segments of an organization to work in coordination. The breaking of barriers between the different parts of an organization enables a company to respond more quickly and effectively to the demands of customers and other stakeholders.
LIMITATIONS OF AUDIT
Audit has its limitations, too. It is not a cure for all kinds of management problems. Given here are some of the issues that cannot be solved through audit. An audit can neither help in prioritizing changes nor in allocating resources. At the most, it can provide certain clues regarding changes that are most important. Audit cannot mobilize people to take action. Though audit identifies various problems that exist in the organizational systems and processes, it cannot help the management bring about changes to solve these problems. In order to bring about such changes, there is need for commitment and support from all the people within the organization. Audit cannot generate better data than the measures used to gather those. For example, if a questionnaire used during audit for collecting data has a flaw, then the results of the audit will also be faulty. Hence, it is important to plan on proper audit tools to be used in the audit. An audit, by itself, cannot improve performance. Since an audit brings out the weaknesses in the system and identifies opportunities for improvement, it should not be conducted unless there is a strong commitment to improve or strengthen the process being studied. Audit should not be used for wrongful purposes. It should not be used for personal indictment and to justify improper actions.
Financial Audits Relies primarily on standards set externally (by government or by professional standards groups). Procedures are formalized and consistent from company to company. Compliance with procedures adds credibility to the audit. Standards are essentially the same from audit to audit Focus is on complying with standards set by external groups Audience is often primarily external, with audit standards used as a way of building credibility Generally conducted yearly Focuses on measures that affect only financial performance.
Non Financial Audits Relies primarily on standards set internally on the basis of customer and competitor information. Procedures are fluid and should be adapted by each company. Measures should be created that suit the companys needs Standards should change as performance improves. Focus is on exceeding standards set internally or by industry competitors. Audience is generally internal, with data being used primarily to improve performance. Conducted, on average, every 18 to 24 months. Focuses on a broad range of functions that contribute to the success or failure of a particular process.
MANAGEMENT AUDIT
With the continuous growth of firms, the importance of control has increased. Decentralization in organizations is responsible for the fact that control has assumed more importance. The growth of organizations should not lead to laxity in controls. An efficient manager understands the need for an impartial analysis of the firms operations and conducts a management audit. A management audit is defined as an examination of the conditions and a diagnosis of deficiencies with recommendations for correcting them. According to John C Burton, In a management audit, the auditor will see whether management is getting information relevant to the decisions and actions which it must take. This will require a much more intensive analysis of information needs and the efficiency of the existing system in meeting them. The auditor will not have to decide whether management is making the right strategic and operative decisions but rather whether management has available to it and is using the relevant information and techniques necessary to evaluate rationally the various alternatives that exist.
Compliance management audit Program management audit Functional management audit Efficiency audit Propriety Audit Complete management audit Complete management audit evaluates the firms current activities, and measures the gaps between its existing policies and objectives, and its actual activities. In case its actual practice does not conform to the firms policies corrective action is proposed. If the auditor comes across some weaknesses in the policies and objectives, he may suggest changes in them, regardless of the degree of conformation. Complete management audit is however, not designed to punish the inefficient or reprimand people who make honest mistakes. Complete management audit is conducted from a positive, and not a negative viewpoint, that is when weaknesses in operations or people are uncovered, non-vindictive suggestions are given with the hope of improving operational performance and the productivity of the personnel concerned. Compliance management audit According to compliance audit, auditors are asked to identify the gaps between the companys existing policies and objectives, and its actual practice. However, in this case, the auditors do not make any recommendations for improvements. They simply present their observations to the top management. The top management consults its personnel to decide whether, what, or how corrective action should be taken. This type of audit eliminates the fear of directives being imposed on the firm by an outside party. However, the disadvantage of this type of audit is that it fails to utilize the knowledge and experience of the auditors. It also does not avail of the possible benefits of observations made by the trained specialists from outside the organization. Program management audit Program management audit is similar to complete management audit and compliance audit; the only difference being the fact that it focusses on a specific program. Program management audit is designed to appraise performance within a specified program and it does not disturb other operations of the firm. Functional management audit Functional audit measures the difference between the actual performance of an organization and its objectives, with emphasis on a particular function. For example, manufacturing firms may regularly hold an audit of their quality control function. Such an audit will help the firm to regularly check the efficiency of internal controls over the quality of its products. Efficiency audit Efficiency audit is conducted to ensure that money is so utilized as to generate handsome returns. The objectives of efficiency audit are: To invest the capital in areas that generate optimum returns To plan and invest judiciously in various functions Propriety audit Propriety audit is conducted to examine the effect of the management's decisions and actions on the society and public. While conducting this audit, the auditor examines all transactions of the company to find out whether any of the transactions has negatively affected public interests. The audit of public sector companies conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is a type of propriety audit. The objective of this kind of audit is to identify the loopholes in administrative rules and regulations, and to suggest methods for improving the execution of future plans and projects.
Frequency The frequency of conducting audits depends on the organization. When the organization is subject to rapid change or the total resources utilized are expensive, the frequency of management auditing should be greater than when it does not undergo rapid changes or the resources employed are not high in value. In essence, management audits should be conducted often enough to provide protection against growing problems. On the other hand, they should not be so frequent as to lead to repetitious results.
INTERNAL AUDIT
Internal audit can be viewed from two different perspectives-the traditional perspective and the modern perspective. Viewed from a traditional perspective, internal audit is found to play the following roles: Check whether the existing controls are effective and adequate Check whether the financial reports and other records show the actual results of the company Check whether the sub-units of the organization are following the policies and procedures laid down by the management. The traditional concept of internal auditing has a narrow scope whereas the modern concept has wider scope. The fact that the modern internal auditing is wider is reflected in the new definition of internal auditing given by the rol Systems Institute of Internal Auditors, "An independent appraisal function established within an organization to examine and evaluate its activities as a service to the organization. The objective of internal auditing is to assist members of the organization in the effective discharge of their responsibilities. To this end, internal audit furnishes them with analyses, appraisals, recommendations, counsel and information concerning the activities reviewed." This definition implies that an internal auditor has to go beyond checking the books of account and related records. He has to appraise the various operational functions of an organization and provide recommendations about these. Thus, according to the modern concept of internal auditing, the internal auditor is involved in conducting a review of operations, and internal audit and operational audit are almost synonymous.
operations, such organizations appoint a team of specialists called internal auditors to monitor, track and report such discrepancies, inefficiencies of personnel in the concerned departments.