Sexual selection

One of our pieces on

Biology

The science of life

Genetics Evolution Cell Theory Zoology Botany Biology articles

Animal Cloning Directed mutation Human Genome Project Irritable bowel syndrome

Phylogeny Symbiosis Thiomersal

v-t-e

Sexual selection is a special form of natural selection, which acts on mating success rather than direct fitness. In many regards, natural selection and sexual selection are the same; it is, after all, difficult to reproduce if one is dead. However, because the two types of selection operate on different parts of an organism's life, they can come into competition.
Contents
[hide]

1 History 2 Natural vs. sexual selection

3 Mechanism of sexual selection 4 Sexual selection in action 5 Other examples of sexual selection 6 See also 7 Further reading 8 Footnotes

[edit]History
Sexual selection is the mechanism Charles Darwin proposed when he tried to understand a conspicuous class of traits that defied explanation by ordinarynatural selection for improved survival. In his book The Descent of Man (1871) he described the traits of sexual selection as "sexual differences... such as the greater size, strength, and pugnacity of the male, his weapons of offence or means of defence against rivals, his gaudy colouring and various ornaments, his power of song and other such characters. Darwin wrote these traits are favoured by competition over mates which he termed "sexual selection". According to (Andersson, 1994) the idea that conspicuous male display, colors, feather plumes, and other secondary sex ornaments evolve through female choice met much early skepticism from the scientific community. Alfred Russel Wallace for example rejected the entire concept of sexual selection and argued that the traits could be explained by ordinary natural selection which increases the fighting power and survival of males. The biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan also rejected sexual selection writing "the theory meets with fatal objections at every turn" and regarded it as refuted. It wasn't until after a century had passed that sexual selection began to be accepted by the scientific community. In the 1970's the theory of sexual selection gained support from genetic and game theory models, and from a variety of empirical studies.[1]

[edit]Natural

vs. sexual selection

The key difference between sexual and natural selection is that natural selection acts on traits which increase fitness, whereas sexual selection favors any adaptation which enhances mating success, or the number of copulations. Sexual selection has led to the derivation of some of the most bizarre adaptations in the animal kingdom, including some which could never have arisen by natural selection alone.

[edit]Mechanism

of sexual selection

As mentioned above, sexual selection is any selection acting upon mating success, and it can come in two forms. The first of these is intersexual selection (often called "female choice", though females don't always do the choosing). This is the type of selection most people think of when they hear the term, and it operates via the choice of the limiting sex when it comes to mating partners. In evolutionary biology, the limiting sex is the sex which has the higher parental investment and thus faces the most pressure to make a good mate decision.

When this is the case, the pressure is then on the other sex to evolve traits that make them attractive to the limiting sex. Usually these traits begin as honest signs of fitness (the "good genes"theory), but runaway sexual selection can result in extreme expressions of traits, which natural selection would normally "punish". Another form of sexual selection is called intrasexual selection or mate competition. As its name implies, this selection comes into play when members of one sex compete with each other for mating access to the other sex. These sorts of pressures allow for the large relative sizes of males and their competitive nature. This form of selection is different from intersexual selection because the limiting sex is not making the choice; rather, the most competitive [usually] male gets to mate with the local females. Whether sexual selection is operating inter- or intrasexually, the end result is the same. Just as natural selection favors any heritable trait which increases fitness, sexual selection favors any trait which enhances mating success. This is because animals which mate more have more children, and the trait which allows them to mate more is heritable. It is important to note that a sexually-selected trait must first arise via natural selection, as natural selection would initially punish any trait which decreases fitness. See the example below for more clarification.

[edit]Sexual

selection in action

It may be difficult to envision how runaway sexual selection could give rise to the wild array of ornamentation we see today, so a walk-through may be helpful. Let's start with some species of bird, and let's say this bird's fitness is directly related to its tail length. As natural selection operates, the average tail length increases, because the longer-tailed specimens have more offspring. If, at some point, a mutation arises which codes for a female preference for long tails, then natural selection would favor this. It would, after all, be beneficial for a female to prefer longer-tailed males if their offspring will also have longer tails and be more fit (this is the basis of the "good genes" theory). But what happens when the birds' tails reach their optimal length? Up until now, the female preference and natural selection have been seeing eye-to-eye, but if the female's genes keep operating, they will continue to prefer the longest-tailed males. Once the tails continue to increase past their optimal size, sexual selection has taken over and will continue to operate until the tails reach their physical limit (beyond which natural selection would again punish those birds with tails so long they cannot survive). Althought natural selection first gave rise to longer tails, runaway sexual selection made them into the gaudy things we see today.

[edit]Other

examples of sexual selection

Sexual selection accounts for many traits in the animal kingdom which would be impossible via natural selection alone. The examples are followed by their category (female choice or mate competition).

the highly ornamental plumage of most male birds (female choice)

the neck of the giraffe (mate competition) large relative sizes of males (mate competition) the highly elaborate courtship rituals of animals (both, but mainly female choice)

[edit]See

the bowers of bowerbirds (female choice) Penis size in humans (female choice)[2]

also

Natural selection Social selection Evolution The Ant and the Peacock

[edit]Further

reading

Helena Cronin The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today Cambridge University Press, 1991

Mary Margaret Bartley A Century of Debate: the History of Sexual Selection Theory (1871-1971) Cornell University, 1994

[edit]Footnotes

Carl Jay Bajema Evolution by Sexual Selection Theory: Prior to 1900 John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 1984

1.

M. B. Andersson Sexual Selection Princeton University Press 1994, pp. 17-19 ISBN 978-0691000572

2.

Wikipedia: Sexual selection in human evolution: Human sexual anatomy

Evolution Articles on RationalWiki

ance - Behe interview - Cladistics - Common descent: the incontrovertible evidence - Darwinism - De-evolution - Dinosaur - Disproving Intelligent Design - Disproving Ev genics - EvoWiki - Evobabble - Evolution - Evolutionist - Fossil record - Human - Macroevolution - Microevolution - Natural selection - Niche - Palaeos - Phylogen Signal detection theory - Social Darwinism - Stephen Jay Gould - Theory of Evolution - Wedge Document -

Categories:

Biology


Log in / create account

Evolution

Page Talk Read Edit Fossil record

Navigation

Main page Recent changes Random page Help Best of RationalWiki

All logs Community Saloon bar Forum To do list Technical support Intercom

Blog Toolbox What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link

Donate

This page was last modified on 6 February 2013, at 21:16. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki:Copyrights. For concerns on copyright infringement please see: RationalWiki:Copyright violations

Privacy policy About RationalWiki Disclaimers

Natural Selection and the Origin of Species

Natural selection operates on the variability that is inherent in all populations. Natural selection can be seen as differences in reproductive rates among the variants within a population. Since the possessors of different genotypes produce differing numbers of offspring, their contribution to the next generation differs, and this brings about changes in the gene pool. Individuals or populations with higher survival or fertility rates are said to be better fitted to the environment in which they live. There are three types of natural selection: directional selection, stabilizing selection, and disruptive selection. In addition to natural selection, there are two other types of selection: kin selection and sexual selection. In kin selection, an individual contributes to his or her reproductive success by acting in a manner that allows his or her kin to be reproductively successful. One type of sexual selection is intersexual selection, which selects for traits that make males more attractive to females. Intrasexual selection involves males competing with one another with the successful individuals contributing genes to the next generation. Macroevolution includes those processes responsible for the evolution of species and higher taxa. The local reproductive population is the deme, and the forces of evolution operate to bring about changes in gene frequencies within gene pools of demes. When demes or groups of demes become reproductively isolated, subspecies may develop. This elimination of gene flow between demes - which is usually the result of some type of geographical barrier - allows for the accumulation of different mutations within each deme. These accumulations and genefrequency changes - generated within and restricted to each deme ultimately make successful reproduction between the demes impossible. Over time, these populations may become distinct species, called allopatric species. Sympatric species are closely related species that have come to reside in the same geographical area. Yet gene flow is effectively prevented by one of several reproductive isolating mechanisms: ecological isolation, seasonal isolation, sexual isolation, mechanical isolation, gametic mortality, zygotic mortality, hybrid inviability, and hybrid sterility. Populations within a species will tend to disperse into new regions where they occupy similar ecological niches, but these new niches can never be identical to the original ones. Certain individuals within the population may possess preadapted variations that increase their

adaptation in the new niche. When a population enters an area in which it has no competition, or when a population evolves new anatomical or physiological adaptations, speciation maybe quite rapid. This rapid proliferation of species is an adaptive radiation. However, if populations unable to compete in their original niche do not adapt to new or changing niches, extinction may result.

I. Students need to understand the process of natural selection, including important concepts such as reproductive population, variability, and environment, habitat, and niche. II. Students should be able to distinguish between natural selection, kin selection, and sexual selection, - and understand the mechanisms by which all three operate. III. Students should be able to describe the ways in which macroevolution may occur, including the roles of competition, preadaptation, adaptive radiation, extinction, and generalized versus specialized traits and species. IV. Students should understand the differences between phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium.

To learn more about the book this website supports, please visit its Information Center. 2002 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Float tools only Average

Save Changes

Save Note

Search

Home > Chapter 5

Course-wide Content Glossary Career Opportunities

Chapter 5

News, Articles & Links Internet Exercises Quizzes Multiple Choice Quiz True or False Essay Quiz More Resources Chapter Overview Chapter Outline Chapter Objectives

PowerPoint Presentations Flashcards Interactive Activity