Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
prsentation du projet
Circuit-Est centre chorgraphique, Operaestate Festival Veneto et The Dance Centre ont poursuivi leur collaboration et ralis la troisime dition du projet Triptyque, qui rassemble des chorgraphes de la Colombie-Britannique, de lItalie et du Qubec. Cette anne, Ziyian Kwan, Marco DAgostin et Peter Trosztmer se sont retrouvs lors de trois rsidences de deux semaines Bassano del Grappa, Montral et Vancouver, quils ont mises profit pour faire de la recherche et exprimenter. Guids par la rptitrice et mentore GinelleChagnon, ils ont partag leurs expriences et ont travaill sur des problmatiques lies leur processus de cration individuel. Le projet a t document par les crivains Andreas Kahre, Giulia Galvan et Mylne Joly.
Matteo Maffesanti
Karin Benedict
Anna Waters
Mylne Joly
Marc Boivin
Triptych ignited my curiosity and reminded me that risk is worthwhile, even if the results are banal and especially if what follows is uncertainty. As I travel alone into the studio now and in the months ahead, I am accompanied by the research, confusion, and epiphany that began just by virtue of being in the room with Ginelle, Marco, and Peter. These are artists whose ideas I find challenging, people whose honesty I find deeply moving. Ziyian Kwan I like to wait. I like to tinker. Sometimes you just hang out so that when the thing comes, you can pounce on it. Is there a kettle here? Did you handwash all your clothes? I thought that maybe I could just go to the mountains and do the work that is there. I went to the river again. I dont know. Maybe. I wish we always had this kind of rapport. Peter Trosztmer There is what we have and then there is what we want. I always start with an idea. Then I had a crisis: I was empty. For me this is the first time. OH DIO! Next time you are crying, go to the mirror and look at yourself. I always do this. An artist must go back to loneliness. An artist must. Marco DAgostin What is the intelligence of the work? What is the key ingredient? What traces of the process does the audience see? You dont need to understand; sometimes it is enough to just listen. If you need a ride to Home Depot to get what you need, I will take you. Consider the space. Ginelle Chagnon
The three choreographers are invited to a soundwalk through Bassano del Grappa, having at their disposal two microphones and a recorder. One microphone is for environmental noise, it hears everything; the other is a sort of zoom in to focus on specific sounds. Which sounds did the choreographers choose?
Marco: Sometimes its also good to be comfortable. I had a workshop called Killing your darlings. Well, sometimes you also have to live with your darlings, not kill them. Maybe I am not in love with the material Ive created, but I am in love with the idea of making things I am not necessarily in love with. Peter decides to start composing with what he has, because composition is more pertinent to him at the moment. Marco will start alone, then he will ask the others to work with him. Ziyian creates stations in the studio, as a mapping of the space, involving the other two choreographers. Then she will go on by herself.
Marco has been working on the idea of a set, with one source of light and two sources of darkness. The point of light stands for a place of pleasure or a place for revelation. The first box, as Marco calls them, is protection, for that Marco gives specific tasks. The second box is intimacy, loneliness, where the performers enter the space. There, light is what you want, but maybe what you have is darkness. The third box is a moment in which the performers will take the microphone and say what they want from their work.
Ziyian has realised that her development is deeply rooted with her precision in physicality. Peter appreciates the struggle in her to succeed more than her actually succeeding. The core of this work of hers consists of movement, physical ideas. So much that the text part in it has a specific reference to bodily processes, words like pituitary, pulse are repeated, so digging profoundly in the essence of movement and of what can become of a body.
The piece is divided into 5 states, each one embodying a part of Ziyian. Marco detects a wave-like form in these states, which he doesnt perceive as separate at all. I am mostly interested in the poetics of movement, because thats why I dance. [Ziyian] Peter goes on with his research on creating an environment through objects and their relationships with each other and with the performers. Ziyian and Marco are invited to experiment with this concept. It is more about building things than about real dancing. The structure should be circular. The issue raised by Marco is to whether the performer is informed by the object or the other way around. The focus is on how and where you are putting objects. Then I want you to play a game. The game is catch. [Peter]
Yet, the Bassano audience has been accustomed to attending this kind of public sharings and their participation has often been fruitful. Physicality, building an environment, shadows, and protection. What will happen tonight?
31 aot 2012
par Ginelle Chagnon Time has gone by of course, and as usually, more quickly than expected, since the Triptych project was presenting its research in Bassano. In a few days, the trio will meet again but this time in Montral. It will be really good to be a part of this gathering in its 2nd phase, as one grows so fond of each individual. It will be interesting to see how much more familiar we will be with one another this time around. Preparing for this moment, I was gazing at the images of the last days presentation in Bassano. I wish to share them in case you want to access this information. Therefore, I am sending you a few shots of Marcos, Peters, and Ziyians presentations. I am not necessarily expecting to continue this research but it can be good to review where we were when we left the project six weeks ago. As the second part of this project is under way, once in a while I will keep you in the loop with what is going on in the studios of Circuit-Est! In the meantime, ENJOY!
Cet espace-temps associ au studio concourt nanmoins lambiance intime et singulire du processus artistique. Il participe dun cosystme de la cration qui est tout aussi fragile quessentiel. Comme le sont les rencontres. Celles-l mme, improbables et heureuses, qui motivent le projet Triptyque. Si le rapprochement gographique parat tre la pierre dassise de cet change [inter]national, le vritable dfi de cette troisime cohorte consiste en la runion despaces identitaires de mme que chorgraphiques dans lintimit dune seule pice. Car la dmarche trois peut reprsenter une aventure hasardeuse. Elle implique notamment un travail dlicat des frontires individuelles quil importe la fois de permabiliser et de prserver, quil faut ouvrir, mais parfois dfendre.
Ltape montralaise ne laisse en rien prsager la naissance dune pice trois la fin du processus. Elle a plutt suscit une conjonction dindividualits, ayant motiv chacun prendre conscience de ses propres ncessits, de sa propre gestuelle, enfouies sous des couches dpidermes, sous des paisseurs dimages formates, incorpores, sous les innombrables strates de pratique, denseignement, dinterprtation, de vcu. Une cohabitation chorgraphique en trois lieux, trois temps, trois artistes, de laquelle semblent vouloir merger des amorces de propositions bien distinctes, mais encore mouvantes.
Autre langue, autre pays, autre continent. Pour Marco venu dItalie, cette escale nord-amricaine est loccasion de sinspirer dune nouvelle mtropole, de chercher de quoi alimenter des questionnements intrieurs. lextrieur, il observe beaucoup, se fait poreux, glanant et l tout un compos daffects, de dialogues, dimages, de musiques. Ces rcoltes teintent ses exprimentations chorgraphiques, entre autres par lentremise de projections. Quelques parcelles dun automne montralais qui soffrent en contrepoint dune recherche gestuelle, mditative, silencieuse et solitaire. Ainsi, son regard sest attard la devise de la province qui circule partout dans les rues. Ladage parfait pour le retour au soi chorgraphique que propose le projet? Il en projette les mots dans lespace du studio et tente den saisir le sens, la porte, les nuances, la consistance. Au fil de ses mouvements, son corps intercepte le subtil jet de lumire, offrant, par sa danse, une matrialit aux mots qui brillent dans lapesanteur.
The first week of the Montral phase of Triptych has already come to term. During this period Ziyian, Marco, and Peter each started individual research processes and are working on their own. As you will see in these images, the studio B of Circuit-Est allowed us to work in broad daylight, which was a change from Bassanos Garage Nardini. As our dance aboratory moved to the difice Jean-Pierre-Perreault today, our artist will benefit from the Jeanne-Renaud studio and they have already divided the space to suit themselves for their own work.
Au terme de ces deux semaines, une prsentation publique. Comme si les chaises vides qui meublaient un ct de la pice invoquaient depuis le tout dbut du processus dautres prsences, priaient pour une multiplication des regards. Il est vrai quil y a tant observer dans le travail en studio. Par ailleurs, la prsentation dans ce contexte-ci ne se veut pas une dmonstration performative duvres. Il nimporte pas l de spectaculariser une forme finie, encore, comme toujours, parce quil ny a que a que lon sache faire en danse. Il sagit simplement et humblement doffrir en partage une brve image du long plan-squence quest le mouvement de la cration. Dans lespoir de faire briller un clat furtif de ces perptuels processus.
There is a point in a recent relationship where you wish you were at the beginning again, when all was to be discovered and first impressions were to be confirmed... Now, here we are at our third meeting and novelty is not a part of the game any longer. More so, we still wish for proximity to happen and engage in games and discussions that turn around the same circles. That is ok, that is what we do when we were put together by some magical wand and are expected to do something valuable together. Because we are sensitive people, we test each other out and try to identify how we all belong together. This the question that arose yesterday: How much of this person do I need to know in order for me to work with them? The question that I will launch today is: What do I need to know about this person in order to work with them...? Triptych Vancouver is on its way.
24 novembre 2012
par Ginelle Chagnon At the moment, all are working on their own but will soon join in action. Marco set up a collective proposition yesterday and all three artists participated. We will see how this grows into a project and where it will take us next week. It will be interesting to see how everyones voice will intertwine and maybe interfere with one another and how shaping and poetic result will come out of this joint project. We will get to work and see!
26 novembre 2012
par Ginelle Chagnon Todays trio session is a promising continuation of last weeks proposition if I may say so. Choreographers need to observe, identify for themselves what interests them in this trio, what shape this project can aim for, what is the individual body and the collective one of this proposition... We have a lot of work to do. This is great stuff.
Can one begin a sentence without knowing how it will end? It also becomes apparent that the process itself is still very much a matter of negotiation and discovery. For an afternoon, the question of the relationship between the choreographers individual research and their shared frame for exploring movement in this space dominates the discussion. Language is very much a part of the negotiation, framing and preceding, defining and excluding the movement. It is apparent how delicate the balance of their experiences, and how they express them, remains, and that the transition from working mostly individually, as they did during the first two stages of the process, to working collaboratively, or collectively, is in itself a delicate negotiation.
Dramaturg [she expresses discomfort with the term] Ginelle Chagnon reflects on the outside experience of the experiment, and acts as witness to the negotiation of the choreographers individual experience; they continue to search for a ground that includes aspects of their individual research and to explore the question of what is brought into the room from research outside of the project. What is the framework for exploration, and the balance between the work that each brings from their own practice with the work they create together, in this space, at this time? For me, chance and choice are inseparable. Without one there is not the other and yet, neither actually exist. Ziyian Kwan
Considering that this is the last leg of a long journey, it is surprising to see how fundamental the questions being asked areon other words, I realize that I had arrived with the tacit assumption that I would be witnessing a process that had developed a shared project culture. What I discover instead is very much a process of questioning, and of true research. What is the proposition? The question re-appears several times as the group reflects on the result of the physical exploration, and curiously their individual abilities dont seem to make it easier to negotiate a shared response. As Ginelle points out, all three are exceptional performers, and could create something interesting to watch, no matter whether they agree or not. But what is the conceptual and the physical frame of the experiment?
They talk of glass, of transparency and opacity, and for two days I witness negotiations that relate to a space of readiness, of waiting for something to arise, and for the conditions under which it can be explored or expressed. Can one begin a sentence without knowing how it will end? There appears to be both a shared and a separate search for connections, for sources, and for the impulse to move together. Time becomes a central aspect of how they negotiate their presence in the physical space and the movement space, and all three attempt to articulate the premises they operate from. Tension between descriptions of the internal states and the formal frame. For a while, I sense a language impasse. The studio space becomes part of a discussion that ranges from the history of Vancouvers location at the edge of three tectonic plates to the history of its dance community, and the fact that the building serves a dual role as a disaster response centre becomes a point of departure to reinterpret its role. It is the future of the space that informs the research for the next few days, leading to a collective movement exploration based on a theme: dance after a catastrophe.
Its not about improvising together. Marco DAgostin It is not an improvisation, however, although the frame remains open, but a deliberate framing of the movement. Physically, a set of ideas centered on circular and spiralling motion grounds the exploration, and over the course of more than twenty minutes develops into an almost hypnotic motif. The formal restrictions are challenged at several points, especially in the individual explorations framed in the narrative as rescue missionsbut the narrative sustains the apocalyptic quality to the space and the movement. Two days later, the exploration has moved in to Faris Family Studio performance space, and it has become a duet: Ziyian decides to continue with her individual research, while Peter and Marco explore the hypothesis of the Dance Centre as a post-apocalyptic space. The circular motif remainsnow referred to as the generator, and the rescue missions expand into more complete explorations, both of the space and as forays into realms of character and relationship. The conditions of the space are now negotiated in terms of text and subtext, and in their relationship to sound, and Ginelles role becomes more active as the exploration becomes more focused on including an audience. Which will be witnessing an extraordinary group of dance artists very much in the thick of a process of discovery. It is true research, and I look forward to the experience of seeing how they present the process in tomorrows sharing event.
The day of the sharing at the Faris Family Studio. Peter and Marco are preparing themselves and the space: a set of laptops as sound sources, a camera, and an alarm clock taped to their chests; they are preparing for the catastrophe that has become the thematic anchor, and the invitation to the audience to experience the space they share with the dancers as an apocalyptic space where all that is left is the moving body in something Giorgio Agamben calls the time that remains. The generator returns, but its formality gives way to the body as a shape set free by the catastrophe to a circumstance beyond culture, beyond measured time, beyond clothing. The end of days is the end of the human. Ziyian Kwans sharing opens a completely different world, in which facing, direction, and distance are carefully articulated decisions. Opening with a gesture that appears to monitor the bodys pulse, the investigation roams the space but remains tightly focused on the body itself, accompanied by language fragments that transmit some of the data stream back to the dancer and to audience. The process of sitting down is relayed back as a series of messages: no chair... no chair.... no chair... We witness the bodys awareness of itself, its condition in space, its consciousness. Many thanks again for letting me witness and participate.
Thank you to Roberto Casarotto of the Operaestate Festival Veneto [Italy], Francine Gagn of Circuit-Est centre chorgraphique [Montral], and Mirna Zagar of The Dance Centre [Vancouver]. Your work and dedication is immense. Thank you also to all concerned in welcoming us in all three choreographic centres: coordinators, writers, technical help, receptionnists... Your work is done in the shadow of what is shown on stage. It is important in facilitating our stay away from home, our work on our craft on a daily basis, and allows the experience to be a part of something larger than what happens in the studio. Your work, support, patience, and smiles are a big part of our team effort. Thank you. Thank you to the artists Marco DAgostin, Ziyian Kwan, and Peter Trosztmer. Your wish for the profoundness and authenticity of your craft was very inspiring.
9 janvier 2013
par Ziyian Kwan Triptych came at a time of reinvention in my artistic practice. After decades as an interpreter, I decided in January 2012 to try choreography. I had planned to pass the year alone in a converted church in Saskatchewan, observing the slow expanse of Prairie time. Fate intervened and in the absence of a structure to promote emptiness, I chose instead to empty myself into what is for me, a new role in the creative process. For this reason, Triptych arrived as a welcome intervention. Though I began without expectations, I soon viewed the project as a recognizance mission. I wanted to find out if I had the raw materials to make a dance, to find a vulnerability and strength that would allow me to create. Mostly, I wanted to cultivate a beginners mind all over again. In retrospect, I see that I was I trying to concoct some kind of mother yeast from which to mold a few loaves of unbaked inquiry. Towards this building of something that is not yet anything, Triptych was a profound experience. It was a chance to inhabit discomfort, to embody the chaos and void inherent to the creative act. All this within the unpredictable confluence of three very different places, times, and artists. In an ecology where there are few such opportunities, it was a blessing, to participate in an adventure where impulse is the primary consort.
Triptych ignited my curiosity and reminded me that risk is worthwhile, even if the results are banal and especially, if what follows is uncertainty. As I travel alone into the studio now and in the months ahead, I am accompanied by the research, confusion, and epiphany that began just by virtue of being in the room with Ginelle, Marco, and Peter. These are artists whose ideas I find challenging, people whose honesty I find deeply moving. Lately, revisiting the creative act, my bodymind has already been transformed by our exchange. This to me is the root of collaboration, the alchemy that transpires when we breathe with others. Collaboration is a word that conjures varied meanings and potentials. At this juncture in my practice, a little juice to keep searching and sharing is enough to bring me to my knees. I am deeply grateful to my Triptych colleagues and the many people behind the organizations of The Dance Centre, Circuit-Est and Operaestate for the generosity that makes inspiration possible.
This is the big cadeaux that I received from Triptych. A creative pulse can be roused quite simply by a question, a mystery, an observation or a team of people working towards a common unknown. A question invites exploration. A mystery is an emblem of the unconscious. An observation makes space for agreement and opposition. If I can attend such tensions with the kind of generosity that Mirna, Francine, Roberto, Raquel, Heather, Dominique, Daniel, lodie, Andreas, Giulia, Mylne, Marco, Peter, Ginelle all shared; if I can integrate work, ethic, and muse, then I have a place to start creating from. Herewith a few fond remembrances of ideas that resonated with me: Ginelle: What is the intelligence of the work? What is the key ingredient? What traces of the process does the audience see? You dont need to understand; sometimes it is enough to just listen. If you need a ride to Home Depot to get what you need, I will take you. Consider the space. Peter: I like to wait. I like to tinker. Sometimes you just hang out so that when the thing comes, you can pounce on it. Is there a kettle here? Did you handwash all your clothes? I thought that maybe I could just go to the mountains and do the work that is there. I went to the river again. I dont know. Maybe. I wish we always had this kind of rapport. Marco: You cannot do this [but] an artist must. There is what we have and then there is what we want. I always start with an idea. Then I had a crisis: I was empty. For me this is the first time. OH DIO! Next time you are crying, go to the mirror and look at yourself. I always do this. An artist must go back to loneliness. An artist must. Ziyian: Does anyone want to go for a drink? These are just a few reflections and some select words from the many gorgeous exchanges and artful moments that I had the great privilege to be with during Triptych 2012.
Lets start with something simple, a conversation. Lets observe where we are, see what is in the room and pay attention to one detail that keeps coming back to our gaze. Can a simple starting point become a source of inspiration for a singular journey? It cant be that simple but it will do for today, tomorrow, and the next day...
Creative process is not about accomplishment but about experience. Making oneself truly available and aware of the present moment is all the preparation I feel we needed for this Triptych encounter. I admit that I miscalculated the depth of this statement and failed to communicate that to my fellow collaborators. There is a point in a relationship [or project] where you wish you were at the beginning again so that you could start over in a more informed way. But is this wish connected to making things easier or because you think you are going in the wrong direction?
When I was younger, I hated deadlines because I had to stop daydreaming around the task and was obliged to produce something. Now, I appreciate them, as they carry the responsibility of measuring time during which something needs to be accomplished. To meet this deadline, I need to compress my actions as I aim to finish a project. That being done, it will enable me to shift away from the driving task, offer what has been done, absorb the immediate consequences, and enjoy the fact that the project is coming to a halt. Have we succeeded? That depends on what we individually consider to be a success. It is certainly not measured by how much applause was rendered for our work and implication. I feel it is contained within oneself and will be part of the link into another journey. I have certainly been on an unpredictable ride with the Triptych project. I am very grateful to the artists and the producers for trusting me with this quest of personal artistic strive. It has been a time to reflect and to grow in my ability to observe, listen, and communicate and that is quite a gift. Thank you again to Roberto Casarotto of the Operaestate Festival Veneto [Italy], Francine Gagn of Circuit-Est centre chorgraphique [Montral], and Mirna Zagar of The Dance Centre [Vancouver]. Thank you also to all concerned in welcoming us in each choreographic center: collaborators, coordinators, writers, technicians, and supporters. You allowed us to not feel so alone.
Last sharing in Vancouver. There is such beauty in differences. 1. Machisma, animalistic energy, apocalyptic bodies, saturation of muscle tone, raw movements, and turmoil in the space, the clock is ticking... 2. Architecture of the body and objects in a widely open space, refined movements, channeled energy, and specific drawing in space, time standing still...
Two different dramaturgical propositions revealed themselves at the very end of this process. Two unique ways were put in front of our eyes in using the body to show and transmit our individual yet common organic humanity. What a treat. Marco DAgostin, Ziyian Kwan, and Peter Trosztmer, your authenticity and the profoundness of your artistry was very inspiring. Thank you for sharing that with me.
Theres something violent in the way four people who dont know each other meet in a hot summer in Italy and try to work together. I immediately perceived our first meeting as a collision, underlined by the unbereable heat of Bassano. How much do we need to know in order to work with the others? Ginelle formulated this question in Vancouver, at the end of the process, but looking at it from now, it seems like it had always been there, hidden under our discussions, our meetings, our misunderstandings. For me, its always a matter of language and vocabulary: how do we establish our own territory, how do we share words and expressions, where do we meet? And as language brings with itself a huge amount of information dealing with the background, with the past, with the identity, the four of us were looking at each other revealing or hiding whatwasbehind. Sometimes protecting it, sometimes offering it.
We were fighting loneliness; we knew we didnt know each other, we were aware of the great opportunity we were living and we were trying to open, little by little, not to feel alone in the big garage, or under the crazy blue sky, or walking in the mountains. Sometimes it seemed like we were avoiding physical contact, but then a hand, an arm or a leg was unconsciously looking for it. The dynamics between the four of us were developing around the idea of communicating. As four creatures on a desert island would have to do, we were looking for a way to reach the others, to share our own way of working, our esthetics, our practice, and of course our crisis, the difficulty of being a choreographer today, to be an artist today. Montral in September is shining. Its my first time in North America and the first thing I have to deal with is the city, the structure of the city, the identity, once again, of the place where I am. We try to work and live in the same space but this time it seems to be difficult. We suddenly realize that we need to come back to loneliness, the same loneliness weve been fighting against in the very beginning.
We maybe need some space and time for silence, to come back to our own practice, to our personal channel of communication with the world. Montral becomes a space for coexisting. We look at each other as suspicious animals, having Ginelle as our point of reference and balance. Were tired, maybe a bit sad, we miss conversation. The city is magic in its undergoing musical vibration. Where and what do we belong to? Now that Im so far from what I usually consider as my territory, how do I articulate my needs and my research? What does define the belonging? All these questions are vivid and present, especially when I begin to notice the linguistic separation this town is living. Words as weapons of an invisible fight. Je me souviens is written on all the cars, but what do you remember? Are your memories defining your identity, your present? Can memories be spread in a new territory, build a new island?
I look for a choreographic translation of all these ideas. I look for people I can talk with about language and culture, about how we consider ourselves as part of bigger groups in order to orient ourselves in the world again, belonging to something. Its difficult to be beautiful, its been hard to get here, warriors also break, and again: this is me, this is what I have, and with this Im gonna work. And what I have is walking in the parks, feel how the city is today, looking at it from above, working alone, again, trying to connect with everyone whos around me. When we meet again in Vancouver winter is already there, behind the windows. When suddenly it stops raining and a ray of light breaks the clouds, we look at it from the studio as a memorable event, we scream to each other: the sun, theres the sun! Tireness and emptyness, the island has the shape of a fish tank, the aseptic studio were working in. But we look at each other looking for help and comfort. We try to share our lonelinesses, to make them understandable, accessible to the others. We more or less understand the rules of the island where we have to work and we feel ready to cocreate. Again, I need to connect with the place where we are, I want to find the story of this place, a sense in the things. Ginelle suggests us to go into the city and find a place where we can identify something.
I find myself staring at the English Bay, just outside the city centre, where the chaotic and artificial world of the town collides with the immobile and slow world of nature, with the sea, the big boats standing still, the mountains. You can hear the traffic as well as the wind. And this is exactly where I am in the island, in a place where the loud noise of the months that Ive just passed is crashing with the blank pages of the present. Andreas comes into the room and tells us what he thinks its just a banal information: The Dance Centre has been built in order to resist against any kind of natural disaster that would occur to the town. So: will dancers have to save the world?
Suddenly, the place where we are has a clear identity and something to tell. So we begin to work together, lost in a movement in loop, and we see ourselves as creatures, left on a shore, somewhere. After the end of the world, maybe. How can we build our own Utopia? What does happen after the end of the world? How will these bodies move, and what will they become? How can we save it, will we save it?
My time in Italy re-enforced my belief that when you can, it is so important to take your time. To not produce, to share experience as well as ideas. I thank you all so much for your generosity and patience.
Montreal Hang on to your hat. Things will be moving a little faster here. The pressures of the big city will take hold. [Lets do Montral againwhat do you say]. The space in Jeanne-Renaud was so beautiful that it is almost difficult to remember Saint-Andr. Mathieu was there to provide us with anything we need.
Montral gives me a chance to personalize my experience. I am giving a chance to see my own life in relation to Triptych. I think I realize that I need to create more space, that it is not sustainable to cram so much into every day/week. I am proud to say I have reduced a little for the coming year. Montral continued: I have the chance to introduce my family to Marco and Ziyian. Well, I think Sigrid had to go out but at least Thea was there. And beside this I can share Triptych with my community.
Vancouver I think I am beginning to realize that this does not go on forever. If I want to do something specific [and I think I do], I had better get on with it. But the mountains are so beautiful and the ocean I just want to take walks, bike rides, and meet people and talk about things. Ok, but not during studio hours It works. Make your appointments with the space, people, and work. Be ready: inspiration might not be there all the time. Stick it out long enough and be ready to notice it when it does come.
Ginelle, I like what you wrote about preparation: Just make yourself available and present in the moment. I will add: let yourself transform, re-molecularize. Live art practice: get together with people you dont know or people you kind of know and spend intimate time together. Then, when it is over, you move along to the next. If you are luckyand we often areyou see some people again. Maybe you even work with them again. Feels like falling in love and moving away. Thank you for all the hard work and energy [Roberto, Mirna, Francine]. I sincerely hope that this project can continue and grow. It is invaluable. This kind of initiative is so essential to the growth of the milieu affording: a chance for an artist to visit and revisit himself over a period, in the company of peers, a chance for artistic research and development without the pressure of accomplishment, a chance to share with even more peers, an opportunity to experience different places/cultures, an exchange of ideas and methods. Triptych for me, I think, is a platform for dialogue: this is where it begins and it can go anywhere.
partenaires et collaborateursrs
difice Jean-Pierre-Perreault 2022, rue Sherbrooke Est Montral [Qubec] H2K 1B9 Canada +1 514-525-1569 info@circuit-est.qc.ca www.circuit-est.qc.ca
Le projet Triptyque a bnfici du soutien financier du ministre de la Culture et des Communications et du ministres des Relations internationales du Qubec.
Conception graphique Valrie Laurin / Photos Ginelle Chagnon et lodie Malroux