Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
After a brief view of these stories some questions arise in our essay on
the direction of how and when we should respect or at least say something
or not about beliefs different to our own. What does it mean to be respectful
or disrespectful of a belief? What kind of beliefs, if any, are deserving of
respect? What is the line which separates cultural customs from bizarre
behavior? When should we speak and when should we be silent to manners
or beliefs that are transgressing our being, our society or our culture? When
should we tolerate extremist behavior against freedom of speech? Let´s take
another example to illustrate better the meaning of the theme. Do you
remember the controversial cartoons of Muhammad, as they were first
published in Jyllands-Posten in September of 2005? These cartoons
generated hundreds of protests in the Muslim word. A consumer boycott was
organized in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and other Middle East countries. For
weeks numerous demonstrations and other protests against the cartoons
took place worldwide. (Reuters Sept 2005). Western Civilization looked shocked
and horrified what Muslims can do if we touch, say or make a small joke
about their beliefs.
Before addressing the issue we should first recognize that the problem
is complex and that try to give an answer about it could be oversimplifying a
controversial topic like this. Maybe that is because respect others beliefs is a
complex concept that involves a spectrum of possible attitude rather than a
simple yes or not. Moreover, maybe is because respect another sort of
beliefs such as religion, philosophy or political ideas is a fair request. The
problem here is that most of the time such a minimal respect isn´t what
fanatic believers usually want. As we saw in the example of the bus the ads
don’t want to just say that ‘God doesn’t exist’, that’s not good enough for
them. They want to convince others that God doesn’t exist.
Let´s analyze this issue first from the most common point of view. I
have called this “the fanatic perspective,” as the example of the ads in the
buses of Spain, Italy and UK. Before continue let me explain something.
When I talk about the intolerance that we have inherited from science, I will
only refer to Western culture. Because the extremism view of Eastern culture,
in some cases, arrives from other ideologies that I won´t develop in this
essay. So, after that parenthesis let me explain the term that I have called
“the fanatic perspective.” That is the state in which our standpoints are so
strong that we refuse consciously or unconsciously to leave it behind. To
believe in something is not the issue here, but instead, to convince others
and to distinguish when we should convince other or not, is. For me, at least
in Western culture, this “fanatic perspective” arrives because we have
inherited it from a tradition of more than three centuries. I´m referring here
to science. We have inherited from the tradition of science a particular way
to understand “the differences”; the myths, the religions and so on. (When I
refer to ‘differences’ in this essay I’m talking about all kinds of beliefs that
are not justified and understood under the methods of science). This
particular vision of “the differences” usually doesn’t let us understand,
tolerate and accept other beliefs. Nevertheless I will develop my ideas on the
proposal that science, as we know it today, has contributed in our intolerant
way of understanding others beliefs and that we have to learn how to know
when we have crossed the line between intolerance and the expression of
our thoughts.