Airfield Pav Samarinda

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project
Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF AIR COMMUNICATIONS ADB Loan No. 1586-INO Eastern Islands Air Transport Development Project
BAGIAN PROYEK PENGEMBANGAN BANDAR UDARA KAWASAN TIMUR INDONESIA East Indonesia Airports Project
PEKERJAAN JASA KONSULTANSI PEMBUATAN RANCANGAN TEKNIK TERINCI DAN PENGAWASAN KONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA DI PONTIANAK, SAMARINDA DAN SORONG
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION OF PONTIANAK, SAMARINDA AND SORONG AIRPORTS
SAMARIDA BARU AIRPORT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS STUDY

DRAFT DOCUMENT MARCH 2001
SOFREAVIA In Association With AEROPORTS DE PARIS (ADP) BCEOM - PT DACREA AVIA
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Version 1.0 2.0
Date 16-10-00 15.3.01
Description of evolution Draft 2 Draft

nd
Modifications -Life cycle cost analysis of pavement options (3 pages) net present values of pavement options (1 page)
Airfield Pavements Study SOFREAVIA In Association With Version : 2.0 AEROPORTS DE PARIS (ADP) BCEOM - PT DACREA AVIA
page i 15-03-01
Table of Content
1. GENERAL ...................................................................................................... 1 2. DESIGN TRAFFIC ......................................................................................... 1 3. SUBGRADE CONDITIONS .......................................................................... 2 4. NEW PAVEMENT DESIGN ......................................................................... 5
4.1. DETERMINATION OF THE DESIGN AIRCRAFT ............................................... 5 4.2. DETERMINATION OF PAVEMENT THICKNESS .............................................. 5 4.3. NEW PAVEMENT STRUCTURES ......................................................................... 8 4.3.1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURES .................................................... 8 4.3.2 RIGID PAVEMENT STRUCTURES ........................................................... 9
5. LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS ................................................................ 11 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSULTANTS .......................................................................................... 11
ATTACHEMENTS
12
page ii 15-03-01
1.
GENERAL
The pavement design of runway, taxiways and aprons are based on the FAA Standards and recommendations provided in Advisory Circular referenced AC 150/5360-6D dated 7/7/1995. As mentioned in the terms of reference, the pavement design is done for 20 years in both solutions (rigid and flexible structures) to analyze the life-cycle costs as well as construction costs of airfield pavement alternatives. Subgrade improvements shall also be taken in consideration.
2.
DESIGN TRAFFIC
The design takes in account the traffic forecasts of the RERS Report, which are given in term of aircraft movements (arrival or departure) and annual number of passengers. As only CN 235 or equivalent aircrafts will operate at first phase, and because of the short time period of this phase, the Consultants propose to design airfield pavements taking into account future B 737-400 operations (phase 2 of the Master plan) and to adapt the structure for the first phase in order to limit ulterior reinforcement costs.
TOTAL PASSENGER TRAFFIC FORECASTS (2008-2018) TOTAL AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT FORECASTS (2008-2018)
5 577 848 173 583
The reference aircrafts are: B 737-400: MAXIMUM TAKE-OFF WEIGHT at 65 tons MAXIMUM SEATING CAPACITY at 169 passengers MAXIMUM TAKE-OFF WEIGHT at 15 tons MAXIMUM SEATING CAPACITY at 44 passengers
CN 235:
Commuters: AVERAGE TAKE-OFF WEIGHT at 5 tons AVERAGE SEATING CAPACITY at 10 passengers When considering a 70% occupancy ratio for the jet engine and turbo propeller aircrafts, the average number of passengers per flight is calculated as follows: B 737-400: 120 passengers CN 235: 31 passengers Commuters: 6 passengers
page 1 15-03-01
When assuming an average number of 30 movements of commuters per day, it is possible to calculate the number of B737-400 (a) and CN 235 (b) movements during the 2008-2018 periods (11 years). 120a + 31b = 4 855 148 a + b = 53 133 Thus: a = 36 045 and b = 17 088.
FAA policy takes in account the average annual number of aircrafts at departure and at their operational take-off weight. Because of their low weight, CN 235 and commuters are negligible for the pavement design. The design take-off weights are determined according to the runway length available and the operating route (especially the trip to UJUNG PANDANG and JAKARTA). B 737-400: OPERATIONAL TAKE-OFF WEIGHT at 60 tons Finally the design traffic to be considered shall be:
TYPE OF AIRCRAFT B 737-400 AIRCRAFT DEPARTURES BY YEAR 1638 AIRCRAFT DESIGN WEIGHT 60 000 KG
3.
SUBGRADE CONDITIONS
As detailed in the Geotechnical report, the new airfield pavement will be constructed on embankments and cuts. The site is hilly with the topography varying from about 16 to 17 meters (level of swampy areas) to about 50 meters. Most of the site is in cutover brush and grass on the hills. The site has flat areas running to lesser ridges. These ridges are made up residual soils, which are highly variable, derived from several different rock types. The soils vary in texture from fine sand to plastic clay. The swamps, which are covered with water, are filled with peat soils, made up of a considerable amount of organic matter. These fine-grained peat soils are highly compressible and settlement will be very large. Cutting, spreading and compacting the residual soil should result in a fairly homogenous mix that will provide reasonably good foundation for pavements and structures. Additional borrow material could be provided by hills and ridges located on the southeast side of the proposed runway. To reduce settlement time in fill area, vertical drains shall be installed through a sand layer, which will subsequently act as a drainage blanket.
page 2 15-03-01
A soil improvement using a 20 cm stabilized subgrade (4% cement) is recommended to compensate weak areas in the residual soil fills. According to geotechnical report, the minimum improvement of soil will be as follows: Embankment Sections Cut Areas
20 cm cement stabilized residual soil 20 cm cement stabilized residual soil 0 to 1200 cm of residual soil Geotextile filter fabric 60 cm sand drainage blanket; install Existing ground/natural soil vertical drains Geotextile high strength fabric Existing ground/swamp
According to the Geotechnical report, the design CBR for new flexible pavement is 8%. For new rigid pavements, the design requires the knowledge of the soil reaction modulus K, which has not been measured on site by a plate test. The corresponding K value for an expected CBR of 8% on the selected fill is 60 MN/m3 or 215 pci (see ICAO Annex 14 chapter 2-6-6, characterization of low strength soil code C). The subgrade will be overlaid with 15 cm of cement treated base course (Item P 304). To appreciate the improvement benefits given by this material to the natural sub grade characteristics, the K value shall be corrected by using figure 3-16 of AC 150/5320-6D for stabilized sub base (Figure 1). For a subgrade having a K = 215 pci, the corrected value is 320 pci. This value will be kept as input data for pavement design. The design concrete flexural strength will be taken at 750 psi (5,20 MPa) at 90 days.
page 3 15-03-01
page 4 15-03-01
4.
NEW PAVEMENT DESIGN
4.1. DETERMINATION OF THE DESIGN AIRCRAFT

The design aircraft is the one that would require the thickest pavement if it was the only one to be accommodated. This thickness depends on gear type, wheel load and annual departures. As CN 235 and commuters operate at low weight, the design aircraft is the B 737-400 for both flexible and rigid pavement.
4.2. DETERMINATION OF PAVEMENT THICKNESS

The curves used for B 737-400 show the weight on main landing gear (95% of the operational take off weight) that is to say 123 000 lbs. For an equivalent annual departure of 1638, the design aircraft curves give a total thickness of 23 inches or 59 cm for a flexible pavement (Figure 2). In the case of rigid pavement the slab thickness equals to 9 inches or 23 cm (Figure 3).
page 5 15-03-01
page 6 15-03-01
page 7 15-03-01
4.3. NEW PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

The new pavement to be constructed in the first phase of the Master plan consist of: New runway 1600x30 m Two exit taxiways of 850 x 18 m An apron of 19 000 m2
4.3.1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

Wearing Course: The Hot Mix Asphalt Surfacing has to be equal to 4 inches or 10 cm on critical areas. Base Course: The base course thickness is found by calculating the pavement thickness above subbase course with a CBR assumed to 20. Using the design aircraft curve, the thickness value is found equal to 13 inches or 33 cm including surface course. The base course itself should then be 9 inches or 23 cm thick. This value is above the minimum base course thickness required: 8 inches or 20 cm (see table 3-4 of AC 150/5320-6D). According to FAA, a stabilized base is necessary for new pavement designed to accommodate jet aircraft weighting 100 000 lbs (45 530 kg) or more. Subbase Course: Subbase course thickness is the difference between total pavement thickness and base plus surface course. 23-(4+9) = 10 inches or 25 cm. As the number of wide-body aircraft will be at least very limited, a stabilized subbase does not seem necessary. The choice for an untreated subbase course will also prevent shrinkage cracks from the cement treated soil to get to through the asphalt materials.
page 8 15-03-01
Proposed structure (phase 2):

Material Hot Mix Asphalt Surface (P-401) Plant Mix Bituminous for Base (P-401) Uncrushed Subbase course (P-154) Total thickness on subgrade Theoretical thickness (cm) 10 Equivalency Factor Actual thickness (cm)
10
23
1,6
15
25 59
25 50
For phase 1, as only CN 235 type aircrafts will operate the runway, the flexible pavement can be adapted to the following: Surface dressing (with anti-K treatment for the apron) 15 cm Plant Mix Bituminous for Base (P-401) 25 cm Uncrushed Subbase course (P-154) This structure (19 inches theoretical thickness) is sufficient to allow CN 235 or equivalent aircrafts operations during the first phase. The design chart shows that it can accommodate more than 25 000 departures (50 000 movements), which is far more than expected (Figure 4). The future B737-400 flights scheduled for phase 2 will lead to a general overlay of 10 cm of Hot Mix Asphalt Surface (P 401).
4.3.2 RIGID PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

Using rigid charts the proposed structure for phase 2 is as follows: 23 cm Portland Cement Concrete Slabs (5x5 m), 15 cm Cement Treated Base Course (Item P-304). For phase 1, as it is very difficult to overlay rigid pavement, the same structure must be achieved despite the lower traffic.
page 9 15-03-01
page 10 15-03-01
5.
LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS
As the same technique for improving soil has to be achieved in both flexible and rigid pavement, the comparison shall be made within the design structure and for phase 2 (see attachments) Flexible pavements: 10 cm Hot Mix Asphalt Surface (P-401) 15 cm Plant Mix Bituminous for Base (P-401) 25 cm Uncrushed Subbase course (P-154) Estimated Costs (per square meter): Rp 309 000. Rigid pavements: 23 cm Portland Cement Concrete Slabs (5x5 m) 15 cm Cement Treated Base Course (Item P-304) Estimated Costs (per square meter): Rp 332 000.
6.
CONCLUSIONS CONSULTANTS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
OF
THE
Taking in consideration all the elements described in previous chapters, the consultants recommend the following status for airfield pavements. Soil Improvement: As a first assumption, use of vertical drains (1,5 m spacing) associated with the following structure. This solution appears to be the best technically and financially. Embankment Sections Cut Areas
20 cm cement stabilized residual soil 20 cm cement stabilized residual soil 0 to 1200 cm of residual soil Geotextile filter fabric 60 cm sand drainage blanket; install Existing ground/natural soil vertical drains Geotextile high strength fabric Existing ground/swamp Runway construction (1600 x 30 m), new apron new taxiways: to be constructed with flexible pavement, as it is less costly. Surface dressing (with anti-K treatment for the apron) 15 cm Plant Mix Bituminous for Base (P-401) 25 cm Uncrushed Subbase course (P-154) ------------------------------------------------------Soil improvement
page 11 15-03-01
The subbase course will be laid on 45 meters to ease the future runway widening and to keep the airport in operation during the works.
page 12 15-03-01
A T T A C H ME N T S
page 13 15-03-01
ATTACHMENT LIST
1.- LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PAVEMENT OPTIONS, SAMARINDA
2.- NET PRESENT VALUES OF PAVEMENT OPTIONS
3.- MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
4.- PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVES
End of document
page 14 15-03-01

Airfield Pav Samarinda

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Airfield Pav Samarinda

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

SAMARIDA BARU AIRPORT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS STUDY

SOFREAVIA In Association With AEROPORTS DE PARIS (ADP) BCEOM - PT DACREA AVIA

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Version 1.0 2.0

Date 16-10-00 15.3.01

Description of evolution Draft 2 Draft

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

5 577 848 173 583

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

NEW PAVEMENT DESIGN

4.1. DETERMINATION OF THE DESIGN AIRCRAFT

4.2. DETERMINATION OF PAVEMENT THICKNESS

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

4.3. NEW PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

4.3.1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Proposed structure (phase 2):

4.3.2 RIGID PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

Ministry of Communications and Telecommunications East Indonesia Airports Project

Airfield Pavements - Draft - Samarinda Reference : 3AP1-Rp-015

1.- LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PAVEMENT OPTIONS, SAMARINDA

2.- NET PRESENT VALUES OF PAVEMENT OPTIONS

3.- MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

4.- PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVES

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi